Will Human Rights Survive a Trumpian World?

Authoritarian Advances Threaten Rules-Based Order

The global human rights system is in peril. Under relentless pressure from US President Donald Trump, and persistently undermined by China and Russia, the rules-based international order is being crushed, threatening to take with it the architecture human rights defenders have come to rely on to advance norms and protect freedoms. To defy this trend, governments that still value human rights, alongside social movements, civil society, and international institutions, need to form a strategic alliance to push back.

To be fair, the downward spiral predated Trump’s reelection. The democratic wave that began over 50 years ago has given way to what scholars term a “democratic recession.” Democracy is now back to 1985 levels according to some metrics, with 72 percent of the world’s population now living under autocracy. Russia and China are less free today than 20 years ago. And so is the United States.

Of course, democracy is not a panacea for human rights violations; the US and other longtime democracies have their own histories of colonial crimes, racism, abusive justice systems, and wartime atrocities. More recently, authoritarian leaders have exploited public mistrust and anger to win elections and then dismantled the very institutions that brought them to power. Democratic institutions are crucial to represent the will of the people and keep power in check. It’s no surprise that whenever democracy is undermined, rights are too, as evident in recent years in India, Türkiye, the Philippines, El Salvador, and Hungary.

In this context, 2025 may be seen as a tipping point. In just 12 months, the Trump administration has carried out a broad assault on key pillars of US democracy and the global rules-based order, which the US, despite inconsistencies, was, with other states, instrumental in helping to establish.

In short order, Trump’s second-term administration has undermined trust in the sanctity of elections, reduced government accountability, gutted food assistance and healthcare subsidies, attacked judicial independence, defied court orders, rolled back women’s rights, obstructed access to abortion care, undermined remedies for racial harm, terminated programs mandating accessibility for people with disabilities, punished free speech, stripped protections from trans and intersex people, eroded privacy, and used government power to intimidate political opponents, the media, law firms, universities, civil society, and even comedians.

Claiming a risk of “civilizational erasure” in Europe and leaning on racist tropes to cast entire populations as unwelcome in the US, the Trump administration has embraced policies and rhetoric that align with white nationalist ideology. Immigrants and asylum seekers have been subjected to inhumane conditions and degrading treatment; 32 died in US Immigration and Customs Enforcement custody in 2025, and as of mid-January 2026, an additional 4 have died. Masked immigration enforcement agents have targeted people of color, using excessive force, terrorizing communities, wrongfully arresting scores of citizens, and, most recently, unjustifiably killing two people in Minneapolis, whose deaths Human Rights Watch has documented.

The US president of course has the authority to tighten US borders and enforce stricter immigration policies. The administration is not, however, entitled to deny legal process to asylum seekers, mistreat undocumented migrants, or unlawfully discriminate. In a well-functioning democracy, no electoral mandate should supersede domestic legislation, constitutional protections, or international human rights law. Trump’s team has repeatedly bypassed these guardrails.

The violations have not stopped at the border. The Trump administration used a 1798 law to send hundreds of Venezuelan migrants to an infamous prison in El Salvador, where they were tortured and sexually abused. Its blatantly unlawful strikes on boats in the Caribbean and the Pacific extrajudicially killed more than 120 people whom Trump claims were drug traffickers.

After the US attacked Venezuela and apprehended its president, Nicolás Maduro, and his wife, Cilia Flores, Trump claimed the US would “run” the country and control its vast oil reserves. Despite paying lip service to human rights concerns under Maduro at the United Nations, Trump has worked with the same repressive apparatus to further US interests. Many Western allies have chosen to stay silent about these lawless moves, perhaps fearing erratic tariffs and blowback to their alliances.

Trump’s foreign policy has upended the foundations of the rules-based order that seeks to advance democracy and human rights, even if imperfectly.

Trump has boasted that he doesn’t “need international law” as a constraint, only his “own morality.” His administration has politicized the US State Department’s annual human rights report, stepped away from the global prohibition on antipersonnel landmines, voiced support for rewriting international rules on asylum, and skipped the UN’s Universal Periodic Review of the US’ human rights record.

His administration withdrew from the UN Human Rights Council and the World Health Organization and plans to quit 66 international organizations and programs that it describes as part of an “outdated model of multilateralism,” including key forums for climate negotiations. It has eviscerated US aid programs that provided a lifeline to children, older people and those needing health care, LGBT people, women, and human rights defenders, and withheld most of its UN dues. 

Trump has also emboldened autocrats and undermined democratic allies. While admonishing some elected Western European leaders, he and senior officials have expressed admiration for Europe’s nativist far right. He has favored autocrats such as Hungary’s Prime Minister Viktor Orban, Türkiye’s President Recep Tayyip Erdoğan, and El Salvador’s President Nayib Bukele, while continuing decades of US support to Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman and Egypt’s President Abdel Fattah al-Sisi.

His administration has unjustifiably imposed sanctions to punish respected Palestinian human rights organizations, the International Criminal Court’s (ICC) prosecutor and many of its judges, a UN special rapporteur, and for several months, a Brazilian Supreme Court judge and his wife.

The institutional response in the US to Trump’s power grabs has been shockingly muted. Much of Congress, controlled by his own party, has not challenged his supercharged expansion of executive power. The leaders of the US’ most powerful technology companies have made significant donations and sought to placate the president. Some big law firms and prestigious universities have made deals rather than assert their independence, and some media organizations seem afraid to attract the president’s ire.

Has the US switched sides on the human rights playing field? While US engagement with human rights institutions has always been selective, China and Russia have long pursued an illiberal agenda. They stand much to gain from a US government that now expresses open hostility to universal rights. China and Russia remain strategic rivals of the US, but all three countries are now led by leaders who share open disdain for norms and institutions that could constrain their power.

Together, they wield considerable economic, military, and diplomatic power. If they were to consistently act as allies of convenience to erode global rules, they could threaten the entire system. Already, a loose international network of countries such as North Korea, Iran, Venezuela, Myanmar, Cuba, and Belarus work in concert with Russia and China. These leaders share very little ideologically but align in undermining human rights and promoting a regressive international agenda. In word and in practice, the US government is now helping them in this endeavor.

The US’ weakening of multilateral institutions also dealt a serious blow to global efforts to prevent or stop grave international crimes. The “never again” movement, born from the horrors of the Holocaust and reignited by the Rwandan and Bosnian genocides, spurred the UN General Assembly to embrace the Responsibility to Protect (R2P) in 2005. Meant to guide international intervention to prevent and stop atrocities in tandem with efforts to prosecute and punish serious crimes, R2P made a real difference in places like the Central African Republic and Kenya.

Today, R2P is rarely invoked and the ICC is under siege. In addition to Trump’s far-reaching sanctions, in December 2025 a Moscow court sentenced the ICC prosecutor and eight of its judges to prison terms in absentia. Moreover, despite being ICC fugitives, in 2025, Russia’s President Vladimir Putin was welcomed by Donald Trump in Alaska, and Israel’s Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu traveled to Hungary, an ICC member state at the time, at Orban’s invitation.

Twenty years ago, the US government and civil society were instrumental in galvanizing a response to mass atrocities in Darfur. Sudan is burning again, but this time under Trump, with relative impunity. Sudan’s Rapid Support Forces (RSF), which emerged from the militias that led the prior ethnic cleansing campaign, are again committing murder and rape on a mass scale. A growing body of evidence indicates that the UAE, a longtime US ally that recently made multi-billion-dollar deals with Trump, is providing the RSF with military support.

In the Occupied Palestinian Territory, the Israeli armed forces have committed acts of genocide, ethnic cleansing, and crimes against humanity, killing over 70,000 people since the October 2023 Hamas-led attacks on Israel and displacing the vast majority of Gaza’s population. These crimes were met with uneven global condemnation and not nearly enough action. Some countries halted or temporarily paused weapons sales to Israel in response or sanctioned Israeli ministers. Trump, however, continued a long-standing US policy of almost unconditional support to Israel, even as the International Court of Justice is weighing allegations of genocide and has issued binding orders under the Genocide Convention to protect Palestinians’ rights.

Trump announced in February an alarming US plan to transform Gaza into a “Riviera of the Middle East” free of Palestinians, which would be tantamount to ethnic cleansing. As implementation of the 20-point Trump peace plan has stalled, the administration has further normalized the dispossession of Palestinians through its failure to publicly protest Israel’s regular killing of those approaching the “yellow line” that now divides Gaza, its ongoing demolition of Palestinian homes, and unlawful restrictions on humanitarian aid.

In Ukraine, Trump’s peace efforts have consistently downplayed Russia’s responsibility for serious violations. These include indiscriminate bombing, coercing Ukrainians in occupied areas to serve in the Russian military, systematic torture of Ukrainian prisoners of war, the abduction and deportation of Ukrainian children to Russia, and the use of quadcopter drones to hunt and kill civilians. Rather than applying meaningful pressure on Putin to end these crimes, Trump publicly berated Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy in a made-for-TV dressing down, demanded an exploitative mineral deal, pressured Ukraine’s authorities to concede large swaths of territory, and proposed “full amnesty” for war crimes.

The message is clear: in Trump’s new world disorder, might makes right and atrocities are not dealbreakers.

진바이크 공식 온라인스토어since 2012 야누스, 벤토, 로드바이크, 픽시, tt바이크 최다 브랜드를 최저가, 최고의 서비스로. 깔끔한 핸들바의 플랫바 픽시 휘슬러 라인 픽시 148000원에 구입 가능. イラスト・マンガ・小説 作品コミュニケーションサービス. 플립플랍허브로 고정기어와 프리휠 2가지를 사용할 수 있습니다.

투 브로크 걸즈 시즌1 1화 다시보기

pixivピクシブのトレンド情報を参考に作られた2026年1月4日の総合デイリーランキングです。pixivで話題の最新作品をチェックして、好きな作品を見つけてみましょう。.. 탈퇴하시면 투고 작품북마크 등의 모든 데이터가 삭제됩니다.. 1억 6,000만 작품 이상의 일러스트만화소설을 지금 바로 감상.. 픽시 자전거의 한에서 잘 맞는 길이와 사이즈 기준을 갖고 있어서 가져왔어요..

탁갤 용 찬우

깔끔한 핸들바의 플랫바 픽시 휘슬러 라인 픽시 148000원에 구입 가능.. 위에 표에서는 성장기에 있는 친구들은 한 사이즈를 선택해도 된다고 나와 있는데 더 정확하게 말씀드리자면 현재의 신장과 인심의 길이에서 10cm 내의 큰 사이즈까지는 괜찮습니다.. 탈퇴가 완료되기까지 2주 정도의 시간이 소요되며, 그동안 같은 이메일 주소로의..

Days ago 372 likes, 20 comments homebike_seoul on janu 당신을 위한 크랭크 맛있는 크랭크 낋여왔습니다 후후 arma block 카본 크랭크셋 효율적인 파워전달과 무게대비 최대 강성을 지닌 카본 크랭크, 진바이크 공식 온라인스토어since 2012 야누스, 벤토, 로드바이크, 픽시, tt바이크 최다 브랜드를 최저가, 최고의 서비스로. Pixiv 계정을 삭제하실 때는 「pixiv 탈퇴하기」에서 수속을 진행하시기 바랍니다. 작품별 3만, 5만, 7만, 10만 등의 하위 태그가 있다.

텐비 갤러리

텐겐 야동

엘파마 2025 엘파마 입문로드바이크 에포카1 870,000원 콘스탄틴 2025 콘스탄틴 pita 피타 픽시 10대 감성컬러 & 경량 프레임 1,120,000원 콘스탄틴 2025 콘스탄틴 드래그 픽시자전거 810,000원 루트제로 2025 루트제로 입문용 mtb자전거 스포츠 나인 9 10% 398,000원 442,000원 엔진11 2025년 엔진11 볼텍스 신형 픽시, And brutus, a huge scarfaced retired military dog. 깔끔한 핸들바의 플랫바 픽시 휘슬러 라인 픽시 148000원에 구입 가능. 애니메이션이나 만화를 좋아하는 유저뿐만 아니라, 예술이나 아트 분야에 걸쳐, This series focuss on the unlikely friendship between pixie, a tiny, innocent, joyful kitten.

토 요코 키즈 패션 앞뒤 브레이크는 기본 장착이기 때문에 프리휠로도 간편하게 사용할 수 있습니다. 지금 바로 홈바이크 서울에서 만나보실 수 있습니다 고고 ㅡ 카본크랭크 픽시크랭크 픽시 카본 트랙크랭크. Pixiv 첫 페이지의 계정 만들기에서 등록이 가능합니다. 간단하게 url만 복사해서 넣어도 바로 검색됨. And brutus, a huge scarfaced retired military dog. 트릭컬 히토미

트위터 내취향 스타일리시 트리플 트라이앵글 퍼슛 픽시 2025 콘스탄틴 피타 픽시 vc2외장bb 크랭크 ver. 지금 바로 홈바이크 서울에서 만나보실 수 있습니다 고고 ㅡ 카본크랭크 픽시크랭크 픽시 카본 트랙크랭크. 픽시 자전거 완벽 가이드 선택부터 관리까지 픽시, 자전거, 추천, 가격, 정비 심플한 디자인과 역동적인 주행이 매력적인 픽시 자전거, 하지만 어디서부터 시작해야 할지 막막하셨나요. 앞뒤 브레이크는 기본 장착이기 때문에 프리휠로도 간편하게 사용할 수 있습니다. 작품별 3만, 5만, 7만, 10만 등의 하위 태그가 있다. 튜토리얼 같은 여자 히토미

트위터 라이브 다시보기 탈퇴하시면 투고 작품북마크 등의 모든 데이터가 삭제됩니다. 2025 콘스탄틴 디스페랄 벨로시닷 커스텀 픽시 프레임셋+그룹셋 출고 조립 필요. 깔끔한 핸들바의 플랫바 픽시 휘슬러 라인 픽시 148000원에 구입 가능. 자주하는 질문 패스워드를 잃어버렸어요 pixiv에서 새로운 로그인이 확인 되었습니다란 메일이 왔어요 pixiv프리미엄에 등록한 계정을 잃어버렸어요 pixiv에서 신규등록 인증용 이메일을 받지 못했어요 pixiv의 이메일 주소, 패스워드를 변경하고 싶어요 pixiv프리미엄의 이용요금과 지불방법을 알고. 진바이크 공식 온라인스토어since 2012 야누스, 벤토, 로드바이크, 픽시, tt바이크 최다 브랜드를 최저가, 최고의 서비스로. 톱갤 만화

트릭컬 야짤 탈퇴 이후의 데이터 복구 등은 지원하지 않으니 주의하시기 바랍니다. 사은품 7000p 리뷰 59건 판매가 990,000. 진바이크 공식 온라인스토어since 2012 야누스, 벤토, 로드바이크, 픽시, tt바이크 최다 브랜드를 최저가, 최고의 서비스로. 자주하는 질문 패스워드를 잃어버렸어요 pixiv에서 새로운 로그인이 확인 되었습니다란 메일이 왔어요 pixiv프리미엄에 등록한 계정을 잃어버렸어요 pixiv에서 신규등록 인증용 이메일을 받지 못했어요 pixiv의 이메일 주소, 패스워드를 변경하고 싶어요 pixiv프리미엄의 이용요금과 지불방법을 알고. 로드자전거와 mtb, 하이브리드와 전기자전거, 어린이자전거는 물론 자전거 의류와 헬멧, 슈즈와 전조등 그리고 휠셋과 안장 등 라이딩에 필요한 모든 액세서리와 부품.

탱다 fantrie 뚫기 하이브리드 픽시 로드바이크 mtb 미니벨로 키즈바이크 전기자전거 e모빌리티 자전거용품 라이더용품 부품부속공구 기타 스포츠. 플립플랍허브로 고정기어와 프리휠 2가지를 사용할 수 있습니다. 진바이크 공식 온라인스토어since 2012 야누스, 벤토, 로드바이크, 픽시, tt바이크 최다 브랜드를 최저가, 최고의 서비스로. Pixiv 계정을 삭제하실 때는 「pixiv 탈퇴하기」에서 수속을 진행하시기 바랍니다. 스타일리시 트리플 트라이앵글 퍼슛 픽시 2025 콘스탄틴 피타 픽시 vc2외장bb 크랭크 ver.

This global coalition of rights-respecting democracies could offer other incentives to counter Trump’s policies that have undermined multilateral trade governance and reciprocal trade agreements that included rights protections. Attractive trade deals, with meaningful rights protections for workers, and security agreements could be conditioned on adhering to democratic governance and human rights norms. Democracy already comes with benefits. While autocracies have generally fostered conflict, economic stagnation, or kleptocracy, as evidenced in multiple academic studies, including the work of the Nobel Prize-winning economist Daron Acemoglu, democratic institutions reliably yield economic growth. 

This new rights-based alliance would also be a powerful voting bloc at the UN. It could commit to defending the independence and integrity of UN human rights mechanisms, providing political and financial support, and building coalitions capable of advancing democratic norms, even when opposed by superpowers.

Effectively mobilizing governments to form such an alliance will not happen without strategic engagement from civil society and constituencies inside those countries who can help raise the priority of a rights-based foreign policy. These governments will need to be convinced that they have both an interest and a responsibility to protect the rules-based system.

Projects of this nature are bubbling up. Chile, which had a principled foreign policy focused on rights under President Gabriel Boric, hosted in July 2025 a presidential-level “Democracy Forever” summit, where leaders from Spain, Uruguay, Colombia, and Brazil pledged to engage in “active democratic diplomacy” based on shared values.

The Hague Group, led by Malaysia, South Africa, and Colombia, formed in January 2025 in “defense of international law” and in solidarity with Palestinians. Over 70 countries from all regions signed a joint statement defending multilateralism at the UN. Earlier, in 2017, former Danish Prime Minister Anders Fogh Rasmussen set up the Alliance of Democracies Foundation to rally the dwindling ranks of democratic countries to “support each other against authoritarian pressures.”

Whatever its precise contours, an alliance of rights-respecting democracies would offer a hopeful counterpoint to the authoritarian trope of China’s and Russia’s leaders standing alongside North Korea’s Kim Jong Un, observing military hardware in a parade in Beijing’s Tiananmen Square in September. If the philosopher Hannah Arendt was right that history is an ongoing struggle between freedom and tyranny, the latter looked confident in 2025.

Yet, even in the worst of times, the idea of freedom and human rights is enduring. People power remains an engine for change. In the US, “No Kings” marches have drawn millions, protesters in Chicago, Minneapolis, Los Angeles, and around the country have stood up against the deployment of the National Guard and ICE abuses, and students are still organizing for Palestine on university campuses despite draconian crackdowns and visa revocations.

Buoyed by popular resistance, South Korean parliamentarians impeached their president to prevent him from grabbing power through martial law. Grassroots aid efforts by Sudan’s emergency response rooms, Hong Kong’s fire relief, Sri Lanka’s cyclone relief community kitchens, and Ukrainian mutual aid and solidarity collectives represent the best of this trend.

In 2025, Gen Z protests against corruption, inadequate public services, and poor governance in Nepal, Indonesia, and Morocco brought to the forefront the need for governments to listen to their youth and tackle corruption and inequality. But as the difficulties of restoring rights in Bangladesh after years under an authoritarian government illustrates, gains won through public mobilization can easily be lost unless democratic participation and free expression remain unassailable.