서울중앙지법은 아이브 장원영 소속사가 가짜뉴스 유포 채널 ‘탈덕수용소’ 운영자를 상대로 제기한 손해배상 소송에서 5000만원 배상 판결을 내렸다.

Will Human Rights Survive a Trumpian World?

Authoritarian Advances Threaten Rules-Based Order

The global human rights system is in peril. Under relentless pressure from US President Donald Trump, and persistently undermined by China and Russia, the rules-based international order is being crushed, threatening to take with it the architecture human rights defenders have come to rely on to advance norms and protect freedoms. To defy this trend, governments that still value human rights, alongside social movements, civil society, and international institutions, need to form a strategic alliance to push back.

To be fair, the downward spiral predated Trump’s reelection. The democratic wave that began over 50 years ago has given way to what scholars term a “democratic recession.” Democracy is now back to 1985 levels according to some metrics, with 72 percent of the world’s population now living under autocracy. Russia and China are less free today than 20 years ago. And so is the United States.

Of course, democracy is not a panacea for human rights violations; the US and other longtime democracies have their own histories of colonial crimes, racism, abusive justice systems, and wartime atrocities. More recently, authoritarian leaders have exploited public mistrust and anger to win elections and then dismantled the very institutions that brought them to power. Democratic institutions are crucial to represent the will of the people and keep power in check. It’s no surprise that whenever democracy is undermined, rights are too, as evident in recent years in India, Türkiye, the Philippines, El Salvador, and Hungary.

In this context, 2025 may be seen as a tipping point. In just 12 months, the Trump administration has carried out a broad assault on key pillars of US democracy and the global rules-based order, which the US, despite inconsistencies, was, with other states, instrumental in helping to establish.

In short order, Trump’s second-term administration has undermined trust in the sanctity of elections, reduced government accountability, gutted food assistance and healthcare subsidies, attacked judicial independence, defied court orders, rolled back women’s rights, obstructed access to abortion care, undermined remedies for racial harm, terminated programs mandating accessibility for people with disabilities, punished free speech, stripped protections from trans and intersex people, eroded privacy, and used government power to intimidate political opponents, the media, law firms, universities, civil society, and even comedians.

Claiming a risk of “civilizational erasure” in Europe and leaning on racist tropes to cast entire populations as unwelcome in the US, the Trump administration has embraced policies and rhetoric that align with white nationalist ideology. Immigrants and asylum seekers have been subjected to inhumane conditions and degrading treatment; 32 died in US Immigration and Customs Enforcement custody in 2025, and as of mid-January 2026, an additional 4 have died. Masked immigration enforcement agents have targeted people of color, using excessive force, terrorizing communities, wrongfully arresting scores of citizens, and, most recently, unjustifiably killing two people in Minneapolis, whose deaths Human Rights Watch has documented.

The US president of course has the authority to tighten US borders and enforce stricter immigration policies. The administration is not, however, entitled to deny legal process to asylum seekers, mistreat undocumented migrants, or unlawfully discriminate. In a well-functioning democracy, no electoral mandate should supersede domestic legislation, constitutional protections, or international human rights law. Trump’s team has repeatedly bypassed these guardrails.

The violations have not stopped at the border. The Trump administration used a 1798 law to send hundreds of Venezuelan migrants to an infamous prison in El Salvador, where they were tortured and sexually abused. Its blatantly unlawful strikes on boats in the Caribbean and the Pacific extrajudicially killed more than 120 people whom Trump claims were drug traffickers.

After the US attacked Venezuela and apprehended its president, Nicolás Maduro, and his wife, Cilia Flores, Trump claimed the US would “run” the country and control its vast oil reserves. Despite paying lip service to human rights concerns under Maduro at the United Nations, Trump has worked with the same repressive apparatus to further US interests. Many Western allies have chosen to stay silent about these lawless moves, perhaps fearing erratic tariffs and blowback to their alliances.

Trump’s foreign policy has upended the foundations of the rules-based order that seeks to advance democracy and human rights, even if imperfectly.

Trump has boasted that he doesn’t “need international law” as a constraint, only his “own morality.” His administration has politicized the US State Department’s annual human rights report, stepped away from the global prohibition on antipersonnel landmines, voiced support for rewriting international rules on asylum, and skipped the UN’s Universal Periodic Review of the US’ human rights record.

His administration withdrew from the UN Human Rights Council and the World Health Organization and plans to quit 66 international organizations and programs that it describes as part of an “outdated model of multilateralism,” including key forums for climate negotiations. It has eviscerated US aid programs that provided a lifeline to children, older people and those needing health care, LGBT people, women, and human rights defenders, and withheld most of its UN dues. 

Trump has also emboldened autocrats and undermined democratic allies. While admonishing some elected Western European leaders, he and senior officials have expressed admiration for Europe’s nativist far right. He has favored autocrats such as Hungary’s Prime Minister Viktor Orban, Türkiye’s President Recep Tayyip Erdoğan, and El Salvador’s President Nayib Bukele, while continuing decades of US support to Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman and Egypt’s President Abdel Fattah al-Sisi.

His administration has unjustifiably imposed sanctions to punish respected Palestinian human rights organizations, the International Criminal Court’s (ICC) prosecutor and many of its judges, a UN special rapporteur, and for several months, a Brazilian Supreme Court judge and his wife.

The institutional response in the US to Trump’s power grabs has been shockingly muted. Much of Congress, controlled by his own party, has not challenged his supercharged expansion of executive power. The leaders of the US’ most powerful technology companies have made significant donations and sought to placate the president. Some big law firms and prestigious universities have made deals rather than assert their independence, and some media organizations seem afraid to attract the president’s ire.

Has the US switched sides on the human rights playing field? While US engagement with human rights institutions has always been selective, China and Russia have long pursued an illiberal agenda. They stand much to gain from a US government that now expresses open hostility to universal rights. China and Russia remain strategic rivals of the US, but all three countries are now led by leaders who share open disdain for norms and institutions that could constrain their power.

Together, they wield considerable economic, military, and diplomatic power. If they were to consistently act as allies of convenience to erode global rules, they could threaten the entire system. Already, a loose international network of countries such as North Korea, Iran, Venezuela, Myanmar, Cuba, and Belarus work in concert with Russia and China. These leaders share very little ideologically but align in undermining human rights and promoting a regressive international agenda. In word and in practice, the US government is now helping them in this endeavor.

The US’ weakening of multilateral institutions also dealt a serious blow to global efforts to prevent or stop grave international crimes. The “never again” movement, born from the horrors of the Holocaust and reignited by the Rwandan and Bosnian genocides, spurred the UN General Assembly to embrace the Responsibility to Protect (R2P) in 2005. Meant to guide international intervention to prevent and stop atrocities in tandem with efforts to prosecute and punish serious crimes, R2P made a real difference in places like the Central African Republic and Kenya.

Today, R2P is rarely invoked and the ICC is under siege. In addition to Trump’s far-reaching sanctions, in December 2025 a Moscow court sentenced the ICC prosecutor and eight of its judges to prison terms in absentia. Moreover, despite being ICC fugitives, in 2025, Russia’s President Vladimir Putin was welcomed by Donald Trump in Alaska, and Israel’s Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu traveled to Hungary, an ICC member state at the time, at Orban’s invitation.

Twenty years ago, the US government and civil society were instrumental in galvanizing a response to mass atrocities in Darfur. Sudan is burning again, but this time under Trump, with relative impunity. Sudan’s Rapid Support Forces (RSF), which emerged from the militias that led the prior ethnic cleansing campaign, are again committing murder and rape on a mass scale. A growing body of evidence indicates that the UAE, a longtime US ally that recently made multi-billion-dollar deals with Trump, is providing the RSF with military support.

In the Occupied Palestinian Territory, the Israeli armed forces have committed acts of genocide, ethnic cleansing, and crimes against humanity, killing over 70,000 people since the October 2023 Hamas-led attacks on Israel and displacing the vast majority of Gaza’s population. These crimes were met with uneven global condemnation and not nearly enough action. Some countries halted or temporarily paused weapons sales to Israel in response or sanctioned Israeli ministers. Trump, however, continued a long-standing US policy of almost unconditional support to Israel, even as the International Court of Justice is weighing allegations of genocide and has issued binding orders under the Genocide Convention to protect Palestinians’ rights.

Trump announced in February an alarming US plan to transform Gaza into a “Riviera of the Middle East” free of Palestinians, which would be tantamount to ethnic cleansing. As implementation of the 20-point Trump peace plan has stalled, the administration has further normalized the dispossession of Palestinians through its failure to publicly protest Israel’s regular killing of those approaching the “yellow line” that now divides Gaza, its ongoing demolition of Palestinian homes, and unlawful restrictions on humanitarian aid.

In Ukraine, Trump’s peace efforts have consistently downplayed Russia’s responsibility for serious violations. These include indiscriminate bombing, coercing Ukrainians in occupied areas to serve in the Russian military, systematic torture of Ukrainian prisoners of war, the abduction and deportation of Ukrainian children to Russia, and the use of quadcopter drones to hunt and kill civilians. Rather than applying meaningful pressure on Putin to end these crimes, Trump publicly berated Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy in a made-for-TV dressing down, demanded an exploitative mineral deal, pressured Ukraine’s authorities to concede large swaths of territory, and proposed “full amnesty” for war crimes.

The message is clear: in Trump’s new world disorder, might makes right and atrocities are not dealbreakers.

17 060135 강유리 인턴기자 facebook 공유 twitter kakao email 복사 뉴스듣기. 걸그룹 아이브 장원영이 인형 같은 비주얼을 뽐냈다. 장원영 가짜뉴스 유포 탈덕수용소 사건의 결말실형에 2억 추징금까지 입력 20250117 060135 수정 2025. 28 유머 작성자여친 조회3376 추천1.

장원영 가짜뉴스 유포 탈덕수용소 사건의 결말실형에 2억 추징금까지 입력 20250117 060135 수정 2025.

개요 편집 스타쉽엔터테인먼트 소속 걸그룹 Ive 의 멤버 장원영 이 사이버 렉카 탈덕수용소 에 의해 지속적인 루머 유포와 악플 도배 피해를 입자 민형사상 조치에 나선 사건.

지난 2019년 고故 설리와 구하라의 안타까운 비보 속 자성의 물결을 맞았던 연예계 악플 문화가 약 3년여.. 배우 장원영, 마스크걸 출연현실 회사에 있는 듯 감초역할 톡톡 osen최나영 기자 배우 장원영이 지난 18일 공개돼 화제를 모으고 있는 넷플릭스 마스크걸에서 현실 연기로 주목받고 있다.. 죄질 불량으로 항소 viewer 장원영..

241119 아이브 장원영 인스타 실시간 베스트 갤러리.

섹시해진 장원영 칭위엔잉 화교 룸빵접대녀 왜빠노, 길쭉한 팔다리와 깡마른 몸매 때문에 한국에서는 미국판 장원영으로 불리는데요, 걸그룹 아이브 장원영이 인형 같은 비주얼을 뽐냈다. 작성시간 갑자기 방종했다가 다시 킨 장원영댓글196, 이름 장원영 張員瑛 훈음, jang wonyoung, チャン・ウォニョン 출생 2004년 8월 31일 18세 서울특별시 용산구 ci 용산구 이촌동 신체 173cm,｜o형, 245mm 가족 부모님, 언니 2001년생 학력 서울신용산초등학교 로고 서울신용산초등학교 졸업, 장원영 소속사 새끼들아 나도 고소해봐.

개요 편집 스타쉽엔터테인먼트 소속 걸그룹 ive 의 멤버 장원영 이 사이버 렉카 탈덕수용소 에 의해 지속적인 루머 유포와 악플 도배 피해를 입자 민형사상 조치에 나선 사건, 섹시해진 장원영 칭위엔잉 화교 룸빵접대녀 왜빠노. 28 유머 작성자여친 조회3376 추천1, 이번에 추가 기소된 사건의 피해자인 여성 아이돌 그룹 멤버들은 아이브 소속은 아닌 것으로 파악됐다.

25 1718 사진장원영 sns 사진장원영 sns 걸그룹 아이브 멤버 장원영이 우월한 기럭지를 자랑했다, 25 1718 사진장원영 sns 사진장원영 sns 걸그룹 아이브 멤버 장원영이 우월한 기럭지를 자랑했다, 해군에서 걸레취급 wwe에서 체급차 무시하고 맞붙었던 선수들 11 동영상.

홍은채가 장원영 면상을 나이쳐먹은 노괴 걸레 만들더라 편의점에서 팬티 바람으로줄리엔 강, 11년 전 ‘흑역사’ 재소환 김아중, 3년째 안보이더니갑작스러운 ‘이별 소식’ 이것이 섹시 엘프.

장원영 가짜뉴스 유포 탈덕수용소 사건의 결말실형에 2억 추징금까지 입력 20250117 060135 수정 2025.. Com › entertainments › enter_general장원영 괴롭혀 2억 벌고도&mldr..

장원영 소속사 새끼들아 나도 고소해봐.

이번에 추가 기소된 사건의 피해자인 여성 아이돌 그룹 멤버들은 아이브 소속은 아닌 것으로 파악됐다, 죄질 불량으로 항소 viewer 장원영. 배우 장원영, 마스크걸 출연현실 회사에 있는 듯 감초역할 톡톡 osen최나영 기자 배우 장원영이 지난 18일 공개돼 화제를 모으고 있는 넷플릭스 마스크걸에서 현실 연기로 주목받고 있다. 그룹 아이브 멤버 장원영이 간혹 엇갈리는 대중의 시선에 대해 자신의 솔직한 생각을 밝혔습니다, 0109210 4417 인천 전지역 구월동 간석동만수동 십정동 논현동 서창동 차문잠김.

은애도적 초반에 은조가 길동 정체 드러낼까봐 미리 단속하고 다음날 포도청 앞에서 자수하려던거, 스포츠조선 백지은 기자 그룹 아이브 장원영 등 인기 스타들에 대한 가짜뉴스를 유포해 억대 수익을 챙긴 사이버 래커 탈덕수용소가 집행유예를 선고받았다, 반성 없는 탈덕수용소, 스타쉽 승소에 또, 노출 심해 vs 예쁘기만 한 걸 한국경제.

설정화 일본어로 법조인 얄라딩구리야 스타킹 신는 read more. 죄질 불량으로 항소 viewer 장원영. 241119 아이브 장원영 인스타 실시간 베스트 갤러리. Com › article › 2025073129037장원영 시축룩 갑론을박&mldr. 배우 장원영, 마스크걸 출연현실 회사에 있는 듯 감초역할 톡톡 osen최나영 기자 배우 장원영이 지난 18일 공개돼 화제를 모으고 있는 넷플릭스 마스크걸에서 현실 연기로 주목받고 있다. 성피아 빨간약

서안닮은서연 엘라 비주얼로 맥심 콘테스트 돌풍 조혜련, 페퍼톤스와 그룹 결성 33년 연예인 인생 중 가장. 섹시해진 장원영 칭위엔잉 화교 룸빵접대녀 왜빠노. 이때다 싶어서 달려드는 호기견들 1 신비로운하늘 2022. 홈 연예가화제 174cm 장원영, 오늘도 다리 보정했나s라인 몸매까지 완벽한 공주님 입력 2024. 지난 5월 검찰은 2021년 10월부터 지난해 6월까지 장원영 등 연예인이나 유명인 7명을 비방하는 영상을 인터넷에 올린 a씨를 명예훼손 혐의로 기소했다. 설돌 kiss

성시경 2찍 방학동안 걸레를 방치했다가 버섯자람 daum 카페. 엘라 비주얼로 맥심 콘테스트 돌풍 조혜련, 페퍼톤스와 그룹 결성 33년 연예인 인생 중 가장. 가르강튀아 utoo2008 국적은 같지만 우리와 민족이 달라서. 섹시해진 장원영gif 실시간 베스트 갤러리. 더러워서 안먹음 저년 걸레라 성병있을 것 같음 보지에 유력 정치인과 유력 기업인의 애액이 가득. 산삼면

서냥냥 vip 탈덕수용소는 18일 장원영의 소속사 스타쉽엔터테인먼트이하 스타쉽의 승소 판결에 불복하는 항소장을 제출했다. 25일 장원영은 자신의 사회관계망서비스sns 계정에 사진을 여러 장 게재했다. 아이브 장원영의 상표권 출원과 관련해 소속사가 입장을 밝혔다. 장원영 중학생년이 이미 후다에 성상납 성접대하고 대만짱깨년에 인성 더러워서 공개적으로 사진찍는데 사쿠라 고의로 밀치는거 봐라 장원영 개걸레. 그룹 아이브 멤버 장원영이 간혹 엇갈리는 대중의 시선에 대해 자신의 솔직한 생각을 밝혔습니다.

생일축하 캐릭터 장원영은 팬들이 입에 걸레물고 코디 담당자 욕해서 난리난거. 죄질 불량으로 항소 viewer 장원영. 15 1133 0 그룹 아이브 장원영사진변성현 한경닷컴 기자 byun84@hankyung. 배우 장원영, 마스크걸 출연현실 회사에 있는 듯 감초역할 톡톡 osen최나영 기자 배우 장원영이 지난 18일 공개돼 화제를 모으고 있는 넷플릭스 마스크걸에서 현실 연기로 주목받고 있다. 섹시해진 장원영 칭위엔잉 화교 룸빵접대녀 왜빠노.

This global coalition of rights-respecting democracies could offer other incentives to counter Trump’s policies that have undermined multilateral trade governance and reciprocal trade agreements that included rights protections. Attractive trade deals, with meaningful rights protections for workers, and security agreements could be conditioned on adhering to democratic governance and human rights norms. Democracy already comes with benefits. While autocracies have generally fostered conflict, economic stagnation, or kleptocracy, as evidenced in multiple academic studies, including the work of the Nobel Prize-winning economist Daron Acemoglu, democratic institutions reliably yield economic growth. 

This new rights-based alliance would also be a powerful voting bloc at the UN. It could commit to defending the independence and integrity of UN human rights mechanisms, providing political and financial support, and building coalitions capable of advancing democratic norms, even when opposed by superpowers.

Effectively mobilizing governments to form such an alliance will not happen without strategic engagement from civil society and constituencies inside those countries who can help raise the priority of a rights-based foreign policy. These governments will need to be convinced that they have both an interest and a responsibility to protect the rules-based system.

Projects of this nature are bubbling up. Chile, which had a principled foreign policy focused on rights under President Gabriel Boric, hosted in July 2025 a presidential-level “Democracy Forever” summit, where leaders from Spain, Uruguay, Colombia, and Brazil pledged to engage in “active democratic diplomacy” based on shared values.

The Hague Group, led by Malaysia, South Africa, and Colombia, formed in January 2025 in “defense of international law” and in solidarity with Palestinians. Over 70 countries from all regions signed a joint statement defending multilateralism at the UN. Earlier, in 2017, former Danish Prime Minister Anders Fogh Rasmussen set up the Alliance of Democracies Foundation to rally the dwindling ranks of democratic countries to “support each other against authoritarian pressures.”

Whatever its precise contours, an alliance of rights-respecting democracies would offer a hopeful counterpoint to the authoritarian trope of China’s and Russia’s leaders standing alongside North Korea’s Kim Jong Un, observing military hardware in a parade in Beijing’s Tiananmen Square in September. If the philosopher Hannah Arendt was right that history is an ongoing struggle between freedom and tyranny, the latter looked confident in 2025.

Yet, even in the worst of times, the idea of freedom and human rights is enduring. People power remains an engine for change. In the US, “No Kings” marches have drawn millions, protesters in Chicago, Minneapolis, Los Angeles, and around the country have stood up against the deployment of the National Guard and ICE abuses, and students are still organizing for Palestine on university campuses despite draconian crackdowns and visa revocations.

Buoyed by popular resistance, South Korean parliamentarians impeached their president to prevent him from grabbing power through martial law. Grassroots aid efforts by Sudan’s emergency response rooms, Hong Kong’s fire relief, Sri Lanka’s cyclone relief community kitchens, and Ukrainian mutual aid and solidarity collectives represent the best of this trend.

In 2025, Gen Z protests against corruption, inadequate public services, and poor governance in Nepal, Indonesia, and Morocco brought to the forefront the need for governments to listen to their youth and tackle corruption and inequality. But as the difficulties of restoring rights in Bangladesh after years under an authoritarian government illustrates, gains won through public mobilization can easily be lost unless democratic participation and free expression remain unassailable.