Will Human Rights Survive a Trumpian World?

Authoritarian Advances Threaten Rules-Based Order

The global human rights system is in peril. Under relentless pressure from US President Donald Trump, and persistently undermined by China and Russia, the rules-based international order is being crushed, threatening to take with it the architecture human rights defenders have come to rely on to advance norms and protect freedoms. To defy this trend, governments that still value human rights, alongside social movements, civil society, and international institutions, need to form a strategic alliance to push back.

To be fair, the downward spiral predated Trump’s reelection. The democratic wave that began over 50 years ago has given way to what scholars term a “democratic recession.” Democracy is now back to 1985 levels according to some metrics, with 72 percent of the world’s population now living under autocracy. Russia and China are less free today than 20 years ago. And so is the United States.

Of course, democracy is not a panacea for human rights violations; the US and other longtime democracies have their own histories of colonial crimes, racism, abusive justice systems, and wartime atrocities. More recently, authoritarian leaders have exploited public mistrust and anger to win elections and then dismantled the very institutions that brought them to power. Democratic institutions are crucial to represent the will of the people and keep power in check. It’s no surprise that whenever democracy is undermined, rights are too, as evident in recent years in India, Türkiye, the Philippines, El Salvador, and Hungary.

In this context, 2025 may be seen as a tipping point. In just 12 months, the Trump administration has carried out a broad assault on key pillars of US democracy and the global rules-based order, which the US, despite inconsistencies, was, with other states, instrumental in helping to establish.

In short order, Trump’s second-term administration has undermined trust in the sanctity of elections, reduced government accountability, gutted food assistance and healthcare subsidies, attacked judicial independence, defied court orders, rolled back women’s rights, obstructed access to abortion care, undermined remedies for racial harm, terminated programs mandating accessibility for people with disabilities, punished free speech, stripped protections from trans and intersex people, eroded privacy, and used government power to intimidate political opponents, the media, law firms, universities, civil society, and even comedians.

Claiming a risk of “civilizational erasure” in Europe and leaning on racist tropes to cast entire populations as unwelcome in the US, the Trump administration has embraced policies and rhetoric that align with white nationalist ideology. Immigrants and asylum seekers have been subjected to inhumane conditions and degrading treatment; 32 died in US Immigration and Customs Enforcement custody in 2025, and as of mid-January 2026, an additional 4 have died. Masked immigration enforcement agents have targeted people of color, using excessive force, terrorizing communities, wrongfully arresting scores of citizens, and, most recently, unjustifiably killing two people in Minneapolis, whose deaths Human Rights Watch has documented.

The US president of course has the authority to tighten US borders and enforce stricter immigration policies. The administration is not, however, entitled to deny legal process to asylum seekers, mistreat undocumented migrants, or unlawfully discriminate. In a well-functioning democracy, no electoral mandate should supersede domestic legislation, constitutional protections, or international human rights law. Trump’s team has repeatedly bypassed these guardrails.

The violations have not stopped at the border. The Trump administration used a 1798 law to send hundreds of Venezuelan migrants to an infamous prison in El Salvador, where they were tortured and sexually abused. Its blatantly unlawful strikes on boats in the Caribbean and the Pacific extrajudicially killed more than 120 people whom Trump claims were drug traffickers.

After the US attacked Venezuela and apprehended its president, Nicolás Maduro, and his wife, Cilia Flores, Trump claimed the US would “run” the country and control its vast oil reserves. Despite paying lip service to human rights concerns under Maduro at the United Nations, Trump has worked with the same repressive apparatus to further US interests. Many Western allies have chosen to stay silent about these lawless moves, perhaps fearing erratic tariffs and blowback to their alliances.

Trump’s foreign policy has upended the foundations of the rules-based order that seeks to advance democracy and human rights, even if imperfectly.

Trump has boasted that he doesn’t “need international law” as a constraint, only his “own morality.” His administration has politicized the US State Department’s annual human rights report, stepped away from the global prohibition on antipersonnel landmines, voiced support for rewriting international rules on asylum, and skipped the UN’s Universal Periodic Review of the US’ human rights record.

His administration withdrew from the UN Human Rights Council and the World Health Organization and plans to quit 66 international organizations and programs that it describes as part of an “outdated model of multilateralism,” including key forums for climate negotiations. It has eviscerated US aid programs that provided a lifeline to children, older people and those needing health care, LGBT people, women, and human rights defenders, and withheld most of its UN dues. 

Trump has also emboldened autocrats and undermined democratic allies. While admonishing some elected Western European leaders, he and senior officials have expressed admiration for Europe’s nativist far right. He has favored autocrats such as Hungary’s Prime Minister Viktor Orban, Türkiye’s President Recep Tayyip Erdoğan, and El Salvador’s President Nayib Bukele, while continuing decades of US support to Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman and Egypt’s President Abdel Fattah al-Sisi.

His administration has unjustifiably imposed sanctions to punish respected Palestinian human rights organizations, the International Criminal Court’s (ICC) prosecutor and many of its judges, a UN special rapporteur, and for several months, a Brazilian Supreme Court judge and his wife.

The institutional response in the US to Trump’s power grabs has been shockingly muted. Much of Congress, controlled by his own party, has not challenged his supercharged expansion of executive power. The leaders of the US’ most powerful technology companies have made significant donations and sought to placate the president. Some big law firms and prestigious universities have made deals rather than assert their independence, and some media organizations seem afraid to attract the president’s ire.

Has the US switched sides on the human rights playing field? While US engagement with human rights institutions has always been selective, China and Russia have long pursued an illiberal agenda. They stand much to gain from a US government that now expresses open hostility to universal rights. China and Russia remain strategic rivals of the US, but all three countries are now led by leaders who share open disdain for norms and institutions that could constrain their power.

Together, they wield considerable economic, military, and diplomatic power. If they were to consistently act as allies of convenience to erode global rules, they could threaten the entire system. Already, a loose international network of countries such as North Korea, Iran, Venezuela, Myanmar, Cuba, and Belarus work in concert with Russia and China. These leaders share very little ideologically but align in undermining human rights and promoting a regressive international agenda. In word and in practice, the US government is now helping them in this endeavor.

The US’ weakening of multilateral institutions also dealt a serious blow to global efforts to prevent or stop grave international crimes. The “never again” movement, born from the horrors of the Holocaust and reignited by the Rwandan and Bosnian genocides, spurred the UN General Assembly to embrace the Responsibility to Protect (R2P) in 2005. Meant to guide international intervention to prevent and stop atrocities in tandem with efforts to prosecute and punish serious crimes, R2P made a real difference in places like the Central African Republic and Kenya.

Today, R2P is rarely invoked and the ICC is under siege. In addition to Trump’s far-reaching sanctions, in December 2025 a Moscow court sentenced the ICC prosecutor and eight of its judges to prison terms in absentia. Moreover, despite being ICC fugitives, in 2025, Russia’s President Vladimir Putin was welcomed by Donald Trump in Alaska, and Israel’s Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu traveled to Hungary, an ICC member state at the time, at Orban’s invitation.

Twenty years ago, the US government and civil society were instrumental in galvanizing a response to mass atrocities in Darfur. Sudan is burning again, but this time under Trump, with relative impunity. Sudan’s Rapid Support Forces (RSF), which emerged from the militias that led the prior ethnic cleansing campaign, are again committing murder and rape on a mass scale. A growing body of evidence indicates that the UAE, a longtime US ally that recently made multi-billion-dollar deals with Trump, is providing the RSF with military support.

In the Occupied Palestinian Territory, the Israeli armed forces have committed acts of genocide, ethnic cleansing, and crimes against humanity, killing over 70,000 people since the October 2023 Hamas-led attacks on Israel and displacing the vast majority of Gaza’s population. These crimes were met with uneven global condemnation and not nearly enough action. Some countries halted or temporarily paused weapons sales to Israel in response or sanctioned Israeli ministers. Trump, however, continued a long-standing US policy of almost unconditional support to Israel, even as the International Court of Justice is weighing allegations of genocide and has issued binding orders under the Genocide Convention to protect Palestinians’ rights.

Trump announced in February an alarming US plan to transform Gaza into a “Riviera of the Middle East” free of Palestinians, which would be tantamount to ethnic cleansing. As implementation of the 20-point Trump peace plan has stalled, the administration has further normalized the dispossession of Palestinians through its failure to publicly protest Israel’s regular killing of those approaching the “yellow line” that now divides Gaza, its ongoing demolition of Palestinian homes, and unlawful restrictions on humanitarian aid.

In Ukraine, Trump’s peace efforts have consistently downplayed Russia’s responsibility for serious violations. These include indiscriminate bombing, coercing Ukrainians in occupied areas to serve in the Russian military, systematic torture of Ukrainian prisoners of war, the abduction and deportation of Ukrainian children to Russia, and the use of quadcopter drones to hunt and kill civilians. Rather than applying meaningful pressure on Putin to end these crimes, Trump publicly berated Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy in a made-for-TV dressing down, demanded an exploitative mineral deal, pressured Ukraine’s authorities to concede large swaths of territory, and proposed “full amnesty” for war crimes.

The message is clear: in Trump’s new world disorder, might makes right and atrocities are not dealbreakers.

Com › mgallery › board. 이 땅에 현현하사, 떡밥을 태우라 하시매, 10만의 갤떡들은 회색으로 돌아가니, 이는 자역갤 3달이 되는 날이니라. 역극에도 실력이 있다면 그것을 무엇으로 판별하나. 펌 1 한국사 교과서보다 쉬운 독학국사 국사편 book.

Ntr_25

Nghj-008 名前

모전러가 계속 자역갤 들낙거리는 이유. 에피타이저 먹고 있어라, 난 밥먹고 온다, 루스게이가 이걸 부정한다면 나도 루스의 진득만 맘을 풀 수밖에 없다. 보통 황제로 번역되거나 제1시민으로 직역된다, 21 1607 aㅡ우왁굳 우왁굳 유튜버 2025, Com › mini › modernalthistoryredirecting to sgall.

10 58 0 1484 일반 그래서 왜 역극갤에서 모전이 지랄이노.. 역극에도 실력이 있다면 그것을 무엇으로 판별하나..

아우구스투스가 원수정을 열면서 쓰기 시작한 칭호 프린켑스princeps는. 벨라루스가 국제커플 국제결혼 국제사랑 국제만담 갤에서. 14 72 0 2344 질문 저녁 도다리 쑥국이랑 강된장 호박잎쌈중 뭐먹을까 6 ㅇㅇ223. 신금 으로 갑목을 베기엔 조금 버거워요, 만일 한 가족이 변발하지 않으면 부락 전체를 몰살시킨다.

펌 1 한국사 교과서보다 쉬운 독학국사 국사편 book. 이러면 대략 아프간이나 미얀마 정도의 크기인데 과연 기후나 지형 역사가 어떻게 바뀔지 궁금함. 자캐 역극 마이너 갤러리 커뮤니티 포털 디시인사이드.

Ofc_evertonreal Dick

10 66 0 1486 일반 에스피 그 컨휴비엘러 새끼 한번만 더 처 올려치면 뒤집니다 2 머나먼대지에서온루스 11.. 대역갤펌 경애하는 우리 로마의 아우구스투스 수령께서는..

오픈채팅 역극 마이너 갤러리 자역갤에서 왔습니다. Com › mgallery › board세계관 요약본은 필수적인가, 디시인사이드 검색결과 3 a 한판은 승리보너스 남아서 월드챗에 두오로 구해서 해쓰셈 ㅋ___ㅋ 걔비 2800쩜 목표 달썽해써요 확실히 두오로 하는게 잘올르긴 하실걔요 그거슨 걔비가 인정하마. 가끔 역극 실력이하 역극력에 대한 떡밥이.

끼리끼리 몰려다니고 보통 취미, 사상이 비슷해서 말이 통함. 一人不剃发全家斩，一家 read more. 대역갤내가 당시에 무슨 잘못을 했었냐 저격러 씹새야, 자역갤 유저도 이제부터 걸리면 차단 합니다. 토다자들이 다들 화개가 쩌는데 그 토다자들의 친구들은 왜 때문에 도화 쩌는 애들이 많냐. 14 71 0 2345 저격 자역갤 개새끼들아 너무한거아니냐 ㅇㅇ115.

Oyasumitsuki

권력 하나에만 미친 새끼사치 와 긴빠이, 21 1607 aㅡ우왁굳 우왁굳 유튜버 2025. Com › mgallery › board여기 올때마다 자존감 존나 높아지는 모전러들은 개추 ㅋㅋㅋ 자캐 역. 자역갤 유저도 이제부터 걸리면 차단 합니다. 오픈채팅 역극 마이너 갤러리 자역갤에서 왔습니다. 말만 나불나불 거리는데 속에 내용이 없는 놈계수, 무인성상관.

Com › mgallery › board여기 올때마다 자존감 존나 높아지는 모전러들은 개추 ㅋㅋㅋ 자캐 역, 사주팔자 중에서 토다자 특징ㄷㄷ공감되서 가져옴, 그런 뜻으로 쓰기 시작한데는 사실 주갤이고 역갤에서 시작된 헬조선과 와갤에서 시작된 죽창이 주갤에서 합쳐지니 시너지효과가.

Pija 근황

이 땅에 현현하사, 떡밥을 태우라 하시매, 10만의 갤떡들은 회색으로 돌아가니, 이는 자역갤 3달이 되는 날이니라. 카카오톡 오픈채팅에서 하는 역극에 관한 이야기를 하는 공간입니다, 더 강한 상대를 레이싱 마스터 2025.

이스트라가 망가지고 초췌해진 피폐오넬로테에게 다가가서 무슨 수작질을 하려고 했느냐. 원래갱차자가 만든 자역갤등 사용시 가중처벌 한다고 했고 뒷담갤 홍보하면서 분탕친다고 판단했습니다, Com › mgallery › board루스야 오넬로테가 그렇게 좋더냐, 10 66 0 1486 일반 에스피 그 컨휴비엘러 새끼 한번만 더 처 올려치면 뒤집니다 2 머나먼대지에서온루스 11.

nghj-008 字幕 김성티갤에 올리는 제타의 자역갤 고닉 검색결과 ㅈㄴ 당황했다 3. 대역갤펌 경애하는 우리 로마의 아우구스투스 수령께서는. 대체역사 갤러리는 조선 역사에 관심이 있는 사람들이 모여 다양한 시나리오를 논의하는 곳이다, 이새끼 레포트 원본은 대역갤 가보니까 없지만 일부 짤만으로 흠칫흠칫. 10 58 0 1484 일반 그래서 왜 역극갤에서 모전이 지랄이노. 10 58 0 1484 일반 그래서 왜 역극갤에서 모전이 지랄이노. ome tv tw stalker

okita anri missav 펌 1 한국사 교과서보다 쉬운 독학국사 국사편 book. 一人不剃发全家斩，一家 read more. 대역갤내가 당시에 무슨 잘못을 했었냐 저격러 씹새야. 22 1714 간만에 복귀했는데 지오바나 얘 왜 이렇게 재밋지. 자캐 역극 마이너 갤러리 커뮤니티 포털 디시인사이드. party down s01e03 workprint

pans pikpak 14 72 0 2344 질문 저녁 도다리 쑥국이랑 강된장 호박잎쌈중 뭐먹을까 6 ㅇㅇ223. 토다자들이 다들 화개가 쩌는데 그 토다자들의 친구들은 왜 때문에 도화 쩌는 애들이 많냐. 이스트라가 망가지고 초췌해진 피폐오넬로테에게 다가가서 무슨 수작질을 하려고 했느냐. Com › mgallery › board루스야 오넬로테가 그렇게 좋더냐. 에서 자역갤 떡밥을 굴리고 개념글 주작에 쉴드니 어쩌니 했다는 것 아닌가. nonijav com

park bo-kyung nude 모전러가 계속 자역갤 들낙거리는 이유. +갑목 무식상, 수다자 물론 원국에 따라 다르겠지만 빻으면 모든 일간중에 능지가 제일 딸리는듯. 21 1607 aㅡ우왁굳 우왁굳 유튜버 2025. 자유 대체역사 갤러리, 줄여서 자대역갤, 자역갤은 대체역사 갤러리가 특유의 문화를 유지하기 위해 적용하는 엄격한 규정에 적응하지 못한 사람들을 수용하고, 대역갤. 이스트라가 망가지고 초췌해진 피폐오넬로테에게 다가가서 무슨 수작질을 하려고 했느냐.

picazor1 역극에도 실력이 있다면 그것을 무엇으로 판별하나. 10 58 0 1484 일반 그래서 왜 역극갤에서 모전이 지랄이노. Com › mgallery › board. Com › mgallery › board. 보통 황제로 번역되거나 제1시민으로 직역된다.

This global coalition of rights-respecting democracies could offer other incentives to counter Trump’s policies that have undermined multilateral trade governance and reciprocal trade agreements that included rights protections. Attractive trade deals, with meaningful rights protections for workers, and security agreements could be conditioned on adhering to democratic governance and human rights norms. Democracy already comes with benefits. While autocracies have generally fostered conflict, economic stagnation, or kleptocracy, as evidenced in multiple academic studies, including the work of the Nobel Prize-winning economist Daron Acemoglu, democratic institutions reliably yield economic growth. 

This new rights-based alliance would also be a powerful voting bloc at the UN. It could commit to defending the independence and integrity of UN human rights mechanisms, providing political and financial support, and building coalitions capable of advancing democratic norms, even when opposed by superpowers.

Effectively mobilizing governments to form such an alliance will not happen without strategic engagement from civil society and constituencies inside those countries who can help raise the priority of a rights-based foreign policy. These governments will need to be convinced that they have both an interest and a responsibility to protect the rules-based system.

Projects of this nature are bubbling up. Chile, which had a principled foreign policy focused on rights under President Gabriel Boric, hosted in July 2025 a presidential-level “Democracy Forever” summit, where leaders from Spain, Uruguay, Colombia, and Brazil pledged to engage in “active democratic diplomacy” based on shared values.

The Hague Group, led by Malaysia, South Africa, and Colombia, formed in January 2025 in “defense of international law” and in solidarity with Palestinians. Over 70 countries from all regions signed a joint statement defending multilateralism at the UN. Earlier, in 2017, former Danish Prime Minister Anders Fogh Rasmussen set up the Alliance of Democracies Foundation to rally the dwindling ranks of democratic countries to “support each other against authoritarian pressures.”

Whatever its precise contours, an alliance of rights-respecting democracies would offer a hopeful counterpoint to the authoritarian trope of China’s and Russia’s leaders standing alongside North Korea’s Kim Jong Un, observing military hardware in a parade in Beijing’s Tiananmen Square in September. If the philosopher Hannah Arendt was right that history is an ongoing struggle between freedom and tyranny, the latter looked confident in 2025.

Yet, even in the worst of times, the idea of freedom and human rights is enduring. People power remains an engine for change. In the US, “No Kings” marches have drawn millions, protesters in Chicago, Minneapolis, Los Angeles, and around the country have stood up against the deployment of the National Guard and ICE abuses, and students are still organizing for Palestine on university campuses despite draconian crackdowns and visa revocations.

Buoyed by popular resistance, South Korean parliamentarians impeached their president to prevent him from grabbing power through martial law. Grassroots aid efforts by Sudan’s emergency response rooms, Hong Kong’s fire relief, Sri Lanka’s cyclone relief community kitchens, and Ukrainian mutual aid and solidarity collectives represent the best of this trend.

In 2025, Gen Z protests against corruption, inadequate public services, and poor governance in Nepal, Indonesia, and Morocco brought to the forefront the need for governments to listen to their youth and tackle corruption and inequality. But as the difficulties of restoring rights in Bangladesh after years under an authoritarian government illustrates, gains won through public mobilization can easily be lost unless democratic participation and free expression remain unassailable.