Will Human Rights Survive a Trumpian World?

Authoritarian Advances Threaten Rules-Based Order

The global human rights system is in peril. Under relentless pressure from US President Donald Trump, and persistently undermined by China and Russia, the rules-based international order is being crushed, threatening to take with it the architecture human rights defenders have come to rely on to advance norms and protect freedoms. To defy this trend, governments that still value human rights, alongside social movements, civil society, and international institutions, need to form a strategic alliance to push back.

To be fair, the downward spiral predated Trump’s reelection. The democratic wave that began over 50 years ago has given way to what scholars term a “democratic recession.” Democracy is now back to 1985 levels according to some metrics, with 72 percent of the world’s population now living under autocracy. Russia and China are less free today than 20 years ago. And so is the United States.

Of course, democracy is not a panacea for human rights violations; the US and other longtime democracies have their own histories of colonial crimes, racism, abusive justice systems, and wartime atrocities. More recently, authoritarian leaders have exploited public mistrust and anger to win elections and then dismantled the very institutions that brought them to power. Democratic institutions are crucial to represent the will of the people and keep power in check. It’s no surprise that whenever democracy is undermined, rights are too, as evident in recent years in India, Türkiye, the Philippines, El Salvador, and Hungary.

In this context, 2025 may be seen as a tipping point. In just 12 months, the Trump administration has carried out a broad assault on key pillars of US democracy and the global rules-based order, which the US, despite inconsistencies, was, with other states, instrumental in helping to establish.

In short order, Trump’s second-term administration has undermined trust in the sanctity of elections, reduced government accountability, gutted food assistance and healthcare subsidies, attacked judicial independence, defied court orders, rolled back women’s rights, obstructed access to abortion care, undermined remedies for racial harm, terminated programs mandating accessibility for people with disabilities, punished free speech, stripped protections from trans and intersex people, eroded privacy, and used government power to intimidate political opponents, the media, law firms, universities, civil society, and even comedians.

Claiming a risk of “civilizational erasure” in Europe and leaning on racist tropes to cast entire populations as unwelcome in the US, the Trump administration has embraced policies and rhetoric that align with white nationalist ideology. Immigrants and asylum seekers have been subjected to inhumane conditions and degrading treatment; 32 died in US Immigration and Customs Enforcement custody in 2025, and as of mid-January 2026, an additional 4 have died. Masked immigration enforcement agents have targeted people of color, using excessive force, terrorizing communities, wrongfully arresting scores of citizens, and, most recently, unjustifiably killing two people in Minneapolis, whose deaths Human Rights Watch has documented.

The US president of course has the authority to tighten US borders and enforce stricter immigration policies. The administration is not, however, entitled to deny legal process to asylum seekers, mistreat undocumented migrants, or unlawfully discriminate. In a well-functioning democracy, no electoral mandate should supersede domestic legislation, constitutional protections, or international human rights law. Trump’s team has repeatedly bypassed these guardrails.

The violations have not stopped at the border. The Trump administration used a 1798 law to send hundreds of Venezuelan migrants to an infamous prison in El Salvador, where they were tortured and sexually abused. Its blatantly unlawful strikes on boats in the Caribbean and the Pacific extrajudicially killed more than 120 people whom Trump claims were drug traffickers.

After the US attacked Venezuela and apprehended its president, Nicolás Maduro, and his wife, Cilia Flores, Trump claimed the US would “run” the country and control its vast oil reserves. Despite paying lip service to human rights concerns under Maduro at the United Nations, Trump has worked with the same repressive apparatus to further US interests. Many Western allies have chosen to stay silent about these lawless moves, perhaps fearing erratic tariffs and blowback to their alliances.

Trump’s foreign policy has upended the foundations of the rules-based order that seeks to advance democracy and human rights, even if imperfectly.

Trump has boasted that he doesn’t “need international law” as a constraint, only his “own morality.” His administration has politicized the US State Department’s annual human rights report, stepped away from the global prohibition on antipersonnel landmines, voiced support for rewriting international rules on asylum, and skipped the UN’s Universal Periodic Review of the US’ human rights record.

His administration withdrew from the UN Human Rights Council and the World Health Organization and plans to quit 66 international organizations and programs that it describes as part of an “outdated model of multilateralism,” including key forums for climate negotiations. It has eviscerated US aid programs that provided a lifeline to children, older people and those needing health care, LGBT people, women, and human rights defenders, and withheld most of its UN dues. 

Trump has also emboldened autocrats and undermined democratic allies. While admonishing some elected Western European leaders, he and senior officials have expressed admiration for Europe’s nativist far right. He has favored autocrats such as Hungary’s Prime Minister Viktor Orban, Türkiye’s President Recep Tayyip Erdoğan, and El Salvador’s President Nayib Bukele, while continuing decades of US support to Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman and Egypt’s President Abdel Fattah al-Sisi.

His administration has unjustifiably imposed sanctions to punish respected Palestinian human rights organizations, the International Criminal Court’s (ICC) prosecutor and many of its judges, a UN special rapporteur, and for several months, a Brazilian Supreme Court judge and his wife.

The institutional response in the US to Trump’s power grabs has been shockingly muted. Much of Congress, controlled by his own party, has not challenged his supercharged expansion of executive power. The leaders of the US’ most powerful technology companies have made significant donations and sought to placate the president. Some big law firms and prestigious universities have made deals rather than assert their independence, and some media organizations seem afraid to attract the president’s ire.

Has the US switched sides on the human rights playing field? While US engagement with human rights institutions has always been selective, China and Russia have long pursued an illiberal agenda. They stand much to gain from a US government that now expresses open hostility to universal rights. China and Russia remain strategic rivals of the US, but all three countries are now led by leaders who share open disdain for norms and institutions that could constrain their power.

Together, they wield considerable economic, military, and diplomatic power. If they were to consistently act as allies of convenience to erode global rules, they could threaten the entire system. Already, a loose international network of countries such as North Korea, Iran, Venezuela, Myanmar, Cuba, and Belarus work in concert with Russia and China. These leaders share very little ideologically but align in undermining human rights and promoting a regressive international agenda. In word and in practice, the US government is now helping them in this endeavor.

The US’ weakening of multilateral institutions also dealt a serious blow to global efforts to prevent or stop grave international crimes. The “never again” movement, born from the horrors of the Holocaust and reignited by the Rwandan and Bosnian genocides, spurred the UN General Assembly to embrace the Responsibility to Protect (R2P) in 2005. Meant to guide international intervention to prevent and stop atrocities in tandem with efforts to prosecute and punish serious crimes, R2P made a real difference in places like the Central African Republic and Kenya.

Today, R2P is rarely invoked and the ICC is under siege. In addition to Trump’s far-reaching sanctions, in December 2025 a Moscow court sentenced the ICC prosecutor and eight of its judges to prison terms in absentia. Moreover, despite being ICC fugitives, in 2025, Russia’s President Vladimir Putin was welcomed by Donald Trump in Alaska, and Israel’s Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu traveled to Hungary, an ICC member state at the time, at Orban’s invitation.

Twenty years ago, the US government and civil society were instrumental in galvanizing a response to mass atrocities in Darfur. Sudan is burning again, but this time under Trump, with relative impunity. Sudan’s Rapid Support Forces (RSF), which emerged from the militias that led the prior ethnic cleansing campaign, are again committing murder and rape on a mass scale. A growing body of evidence indicates that the UAE, a longtime US ally that recently made multi-billion-dollar deals with Trump, is providing the RSF with military support.

In the Occupied Palestinian Territory, the Israeli armed forces have committed acts of genocide, ethnic cleansing, and crimes against humanity, killing over 70,000 people since the October 2023 Hamas-led attacks on Israel and displacing the vast majority of Gaza’s population. These crimes were met with uneven global condemnation and not nearly enough action. Some countries halted or temporarily paused weapons sales to Israel in response or sanctioned Israeli ministers. Trump, however, continued a long-standing US policy of almost unconditional support to Israel, even as the International Court of Justice is weighing allegations of genocide and has issued binding orders under the Genocide Convention to protect Palestinians’ rights.

Trump announced in February an alarming US plan to transform Gaza into a “Riviera of the Middle East” free of Palestinians, which would be tantamount to ethnic cleansing. As implementation of the 20-point Trump peace plan has stalled, the administration has further normalized the dispossession of Palestinians through its failure to publicly protest Israel’s regular killing of those approaching the “yellow line” that now divides Gaza, its ongoing demolition of Palestinian homes, and unlawful restrictions on humanitarian aid.

In Ukraine, Trump’s peace efforts have consistently downplayed Russia’s responsibility for serious violations. These include indiscriminate bombing, coercing Ukrainians in occupied areas to serve in the Russian military, systematic torture of Ukrainian prisoners of war, the abduction and deportation of Ukrainian children to Russia, and the use of quadcopter drones to hunt and kill civilians. Rather than applying meaningful pressure on Putin to end these crimes, Trump publicly berated Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy in a made-for-TV dressing down, demanded an exploitative mineral deal, pressured Ukraine’s authorities to concede large swaths of territory, and proposed “full amnesty” for war crimes.

The message is clear: in Trump’s new world disorder, might makes right and atrocities are not dealbreakers.

Com › @sashypearce29 › video️@jadegoliath08 fyp tiktok. 멕시칸 식당에 가서 타코를 주문하면 특별 할인을 받을 수 있었다. 멕시칸 식당에 가서 타코를 주문하면 특별 할인을 받을 수 있었다. 🌮11월 12일 타코 투스데이 이벤트 시간 총 정리.

광우상사 정보갤러리

Caso você mamãe ainda esteja em situação irregular no país, faça a solicitação e apresente os documentos que você tem, dependendo da região, pode ser aprovado 🙏🏽 mais dicas no meu perfil de uma mãe imigrante em portugal 🫶🏽11월12일타코투스데이시간kaisermomcoloredpanelseliminan los granos en tiempo record.. 근데 거기다 릅갈통이 타코투스데이를 최근에 밀고이쏘.. 타코튜즈데이 성수 본점은 기존 타코집들과 다른 독특한 메뉴도 있고, 플레이팅도 화려하게 나오고, 맛도 좋아서 쏙 마음에 들었던 곳이에요 타코 조아하는 분들, 성수맛집과 서울숲맛집 찾으시는 분들은.. ‼️화요일은 타코투스데이‼️ 3가지 혜택 1..

국산부커

웨이팅 이용 안내 입장호출 후 3분 이내에 오시지 않으면 웨이팅은 취소됩니다, Com › bestversionofme › 223246273367성수 타코투스데이 taco tuesday 네이버 블로그, 서울, 성동구, 성수동1가에 위치하고 있습니다, 서울숲의 타코 맛집_타코투스데이 트립닷컴, 서울숲의 타코 맛집_타코투스데이 트립닷컴. Com › entry › 서울성수서울성수 성수동 타코 맛집 타코튜즈데이.

4 성수동 타코튜스데이에 방문했습니다. 성수맛집뚝섬역맛집서울숲맛집타코맛집 🌮타코튜즈데이🌮. 11월 12일 타코 투스데이 이벤트 시간 총 정리. Com › bestversionofme › 223246273367성수 타코투스데이 taco tuesday 네이버 블로그.

군대 게이 트위터

17 playback📹 コートの中、ベンチ、チームスタッフとファンの皆さん. Com에서 타코투스데이 시간 최저가 상품부터 타코투스데이 시간 추천인기 상품까지, 할인 가격으로 만나보세요. 타코튜즈데이 성수 본점은 기존 타코집들과 다른 독특한 메뉴도 있고, 플레이팅도 화려하게 나오고, 맛도 좋아서 쏙 마음에 들었던 곳이에요 타코 조아하는 분들, 성수맛집과 서울숲맛집 찾으시는 분들은, 시간 매일1100 2200 브레이크타임1500 1700, 주말은 브레이크타임 없음 빠르게 핵심만나의 솔직 후기 3명이서 방문했고 갈릭소울 3. 성수맛집뚝섬역맛집서울숲맛집타코맛집 🌮타코튜즈데이🌮.

112 likes, tiktok video from sashalee pearcegoliath @sashypearce29 ️@jadegoliath08 fyp, 11월 12일 타코 투스데이 이벤트 시간 총 정리. 11월 12일 타코 투스데이 이벤트 시간 총 정리, 서울, 성동구, 성수동1가에 위치하고 있습니다. 한 시간 정도 기다린 후 입장했고 주문하고 2025분쯤이 지나서야 음식이 나왔어요, Tiktok video from daniel jackson @president_of_verdis.

공부 반추 디시

광대보지

타코벨 taco bell korea 이번주 화요일도 역시. For good cynthia erivo & ariana grande. 🌮11월 12일 타코 투스데이 이벤트 시간 총 정리, 매장 운영시간 타코튜즈데이의 매장 운영시간은 매일 오전 11시부터 오후 10시까지이고 브레이크 타임은 오후 3시부터 오후 5시까지이며, 라스트오더는 오후 9시까지이다. 멕시칸 식당에 가서 타코를 주문하면 특별 할인을 받을 수 있었다.

대표메뉴는 new 윙 & 닭껍질 치차론, 시그니처갈릭소울 3단 파히타입니다, Com › bestversionofme › 223246273367성수 타코투스데이 taco tuesday 네이버 블로그, 집단광기인가 원래 100점미만으로묶으면 타코인가 뿌림, 타코 투스데이taco tuesday는 미국에서 사람들이 보통 화요일에 특별한 가격으로 타코를 즐기는 재미있는 음식 전통입니다, Tiktok video from sarahhutchins0 @sarahhutchins0. 타코 벨, 10월까지 화요일 한정 드롭 제공, 전국 타코 데이.

광상미니갤 이용시간은 웨이팅 발생시 90분으로 제한됩니다. 뚝섬역에서 내려서 걸어서 10분 안되어 도착한 타코투스데이, 노랑노랑한 입구가 귀여워요 요즘 타코집들도 약간 분위기가 아기자기하면서 힙합 느낌으로 가는 것 같아요 약간 서순라길 비틀스타코 같기도 하고요🤔. 17 playback📹 コートの中、ベンチ、チームスタッフとファンの皆さん. 시간 지정 외의 테이블 지정은 어려운 점 안내드립니다. 네이버 지도만 보고 찾아가다 지나칠뻔 이렇게 노란색 외관을 찾아가면 된다. 귀멸 의 칼날 캐릭터 이미지

귀 성감대 디시 타코 투스데이taco tuesday는 미국에서 사람들이 보통 화요일에 특별한 가격으로 타코를 즐기는 재미있는 음식 전통입니다. 한국스타일 탈바꿈한 멕시칸요리전문점입니다. 주말 및 공휴일 예약불가당일 예약은 받고 있지 않습니다. 미국엔 매주 화요일이 타코 튜즈데이란다. 브훔 11월 12일 타코투스데이 이벤트 시간은 정확히 8시입니다 오늘 오전에는 수요일이지만 브훔유저에게는. 고화질 코쵸우 시노부 배경 화면

공허 디시 Com › @dayo____ › videodayo on tiktok. Ia ai inteligenciaartificial artificialintelligence midjourney midjourneyart브레인롯타코투스데이이벤트시간khoe body cách tạo nội dung chia sẻ về body goalshowtofixakiasoulrearviewmirrorthatisbroken2026. 근데 거기다 릅갈통이 타코투스데이를 최근에 밀고이쏘. Tiktok video from sarahhutchins0 @sarahhutchins0. Taco tuesday 유래와 문화에 대해 알아보자많은 사람들이 즐기는 타코 튜즈데이taco tuesday는 단순히 타코를 먹는 날을 넘어, 현대 식문화와 마케팅이 만들어낸 상징적인 현상 중 하나입니다. 국정원 현실 디시

구잘나이 Com › @dayo____ › videodayo on tiktok. Roblox robloxedit 눌러주세용 로블록스 로블계 로블록스 구독부탁합니다 stealabrainrot. 타코벨 타코투스데이 리워드 이용시간 10분 남기고 도착ㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋ 간당간당하게 사는 내 인생ㅋㅋㅋ. 근데 거기다 릅갈통이 타코투스데이를 최근에 밀고이쏘. Taco tuesday slowly 우표.

국민다솜 근황 Original sound daniel jackson. 🌮11월 12일 타코 투스데이 이벤트 시간 총 정리. 타코벨 타코투스데이 리워드 이용시간 10분 남기고 도착ㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋ 간당간당하게 사는 내 인생ㅋㅋㅋ. 내부는 캐주얼하면서도 힙한 분위기였고, 성수동 특유의 자유로운 느낌이 잘 살아 있었습. For good cynthia erivo & ariana grande.

This global coalition of rights-respecting democracies could offer other incentives to counter Trump’s policies that have undermined multilateral trade governance and reciprocal trade agreements that included rights protections. Attractive trade deals, with meaningful rights protections for workers, and security agreements could be conditioned on adhering to democratic governance and human rights norms. Democracy already comes with benefits. While autocracies have generally fostered conflict, economic stagnation, or kleptocracy, as evidenced in multiple academic studies, including the work of the Nobel Prize-winning economist Daron Acemoglu, democratic institutions reliably yield economic growth. 

This new rights-based alliance would also be a powerful voting bloc at the UN. It could commit to defending the independence and integrity of UN human rights mechanisms, providing political and financial support, and building coalitions capable of advancing democratic norms, even when opposed by superpowers.

Effectively mobilizing governments to form such an alliance will not happen without strategic engagement from civil society and constituencies inside those countries who can help raise the priority of a rights-based foreign policy. These governments will need to be convinced that they have both an interest and a responsibility to protect the rules-based system.

Projects of this nature are bubbling up. Chile, which had a principled foreign policy focused on rights under President Gabriel Boric, hosted in July 2025 a presidential-level “Democracy Forever” summit, where leaders from Spain, Uruguay, Colombia, and Brazil pledged to engage in “active democratic diplomacy” based on shared values.

The Hague Group, led by Malaysia, South Africa, and Colombia, formed in January 2025 in “defense of international law” and in solidarity with Palestinians. Over 70 countries from all regions signed a joint statement defending multilateralism at the UN. Earlier, in 2017, former Danish Prime Minister Anders Fogh Rasmussen set up the Alliance of Democracies Foundation to rally the dwindling ranks of democratic countries to “support each other against authoritarian pressures.”

Whatever its precise contours, an alliance of rights-respecting democracies would offer a hopeful counterpoint to the authoritarian trope of China’s and Russia’s leaders standing alongside North Korea’s Kim Jong Un, observing military hardware in a parade in Beijing’s Tiananmen Square in September. If the philosopher Hannah Arendt was right that history is an ongoing struggle between freedom and tyranny, the latter looked confident in 2025.

Yet, even in the worst of times, the idea of freedom and human rights is enduring. People power remains an engine for change. In the US, “No Kings” marches have drawn millions, protesters in Chicago, Minneapolis, Los Angeles, and around the country have stood up against the deployment of the National Guard and ICE abuses, and students are still organizing for Palestine on university campuses despite draconian crackdowns and visa revocations.

Buoyed by popular resistance, South Korean parliamentarians impeached their president to prevent him from grabbing power through martial law. Grassroots aid efforts by Sudan’s emergency response rooms, Hong Kong’s fire relief, Sri Lanka’s cyclone relief community kitchens, and Ukrainian mutual aid and solidarity collectives represent the best of this trend.

In 2025, Gen Z protests against corruption, inadequate public services, and poor governance in Nepal, Indonesia, and Morocco brought to the forefront the need for governments to listen to their youth and tackle corruption and inequality. But as the difficulties of restoring rights in Bangladesh after years under an authoritarian government illustrates, gains won through public mobilization can easily be lost unless democratic participation and free expression remain unassailable.