Will Human Rights Survive a Trumpian World?

Authoritarian Advances Threaten Rules-Based Order

The global human rights system is in peril. Under relentless pressure from US President Donald Trump, and persistently undermined by China and Russia, the rules-based international order is being crushed, threatening to take with it the architecture human rights defenders have come to rely on to advance norms and protect freedoms. To defy this trend, governments that still value human rights, alongside social movements, civil society, and international institutions, need to form a strategic alliance to push back.

To be fair, the downward spiral predated Trump’s reelection. The democratic wave that began over 50 years ago has given way to what scholars term a “democratic recession.” Democracy is now back to 1985 levels according to some metrics, with 72 percent of the world’s population now living under autocracy. Russia and China are less free today than 20 years ago. And so is the United States.

Of course, democracy is not a panacea for human rights violations; the US and other longtime democracies have their own histories of colonial crimes, racism, abusive justice systems, and wartime atrocities. More recently, authoritarian leaders have exploited public mistrust and anger to win elections and then dismantled the very institutions that brought them to power. Democratic institutions are crucial to represent the will of the people and keep power in check. It’s no surprise that whenever democracy is undermined, rights are too, as evident in recent years in India, Türkiye, the Philippines, El Salvador, and Hungary.

In this context, 2025 may be seen as a tipping point. In just 12 months, the Trump administration has carried out a broad assault on key pillars of US democracy and the global rules-based order, which the US, despite inconsistencies, was, with other states, instrumental in helping to establish.

In short order, Trump’s second-term administration has undermined trust in the sanctity of elections, reduced government accountability, gutted food assistance and healthcare subsidies, attacked judicial independence, defied court orders, rolled back women’s rights, obstructed access to abortion care, undermined remedies for racial harm, terminated programs mandating accessibility for people with disabilities, punished free speech, stripped protections from trans and intersex people, eroded privacy, and used government power to intimidate political opponents, the media, law firms, universities, civil society, and even comedians.

Claiming a risk of “civilizational erasure” in Europe and leaning on racist tropes to cast entire populations as unwelcome in the US, the Trump administration has embraced policies and rhetoric that align with white nationalist ideology. Immigrants and asylum seekers have been subjected to inhumane conditions and degrading treatment; 32 died in US Immigration and Customs Enforcement custody in 2025, and as of mid-January 2026, an additional 4 have died. Masked immigration enforcement agents have targeted people of color, using excessive force, terrorizing communities, wrongfully arresting scores of citizens, and, most recently, unjustifiably killing two people in Minneapolis, whose deaths Human Rights Watch has documented.

The US president of course has the authority to tighten US borders and enforce stricter immigration policies. The administration is not, however, entitled to deny legal process to asylum seekers, mistreat undocumented migrants, or unlawfully discriminate. In a well-functioning democracy, no electoral mandate should supersede domestic legislation, constitutional protections, or international human rights law. Trump’s team has repeatedly bypassed these guardrails.

The violations have not stopped at the border. The Trump administration used a 1798 law to send hundreds of Venezuelan migrants to an infamous prison in El Salvador, where they were tortured and sexually abused. Its blatantly unlawful strikes on boats in the Caribbean and the Pacific extrajudicially killed more than 120 people whom Trump claims were drug traffickers.

After the US attacked Venezuela and apprehended its president, Nicolás Maduro, and his wife, Cilia Flores, Trump claimed the US would “run” the country and control its vast oil reserves. Despite paying lip service to human rights concerns under Maduro at the United Nations, Trump has worked with the same repressive apparatus to further US interests. Many Western allies have chosen to stay silent about these lawless moves, perhaps fearing erratic tariffs and blowback to their alliances.

Trump’s foreign policy has upended the foundations of the rules-based order that seeks to advance democracy and human rights, even if imperfectly.

Trump has boasted that he doesn’t “need international law” as a constraint, only his “own morality.” His administration has politicized the US State Department’s annual human rights report, stepped away from the global prohibition on antipersonnel landmines, voiced support for rewriting international rules on asylum, and skipped the UN’s Universal Periodic Review of the US’ human rights record.

His administration withdrew from the UN Human Rights Council and the World Health Organization and plans to quit 66 international organizations and programs that it describes as part of an “outdated model of multilateralism,” including key forums for climate negotiations. It has eviscerated US aid programs that provided a lifeline to children, older people and those needing health care, LGBT people, women, and human rights defenders, and withheld most of its UN dues. 

Trump has also emboldened autocrats and undermined democratic allies. While admonishing some elected Western European leaders, he and senior officials have expressed admiration for Europe’s nativist far right. He has favored autocrats such as Hungary’s Prime Minister Viktor Orban, Türkiye’s President Recep Tayyip Erdoğan, and El Salvador’s President Nayib Bukele, while continuing decades of US support to Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman and Egypt’s President Abdel Fattah al-Sisi.

His administration has unjustifiably imposed sanctions to punish respected Palestinian human rights organizations, the International Criminal Court’s (ICC) prosecutor and many of its judges, a UN special rapporteur, and for several months, a Brazilian Supreme Court judge and his wife.

The institutional response in the US to Trump’s power grabs has been shockingly muted. Much of Congress, controlled by his own party, has not challenged his supercharged expansion of executive power. The leaders of the US’ most powerful technology companies have made significant donations and sought to placate the president. Some big law firms and prestigious universities have made deals rather than assert their independence, and some media organizations seem afraid to attract the president’s ire.

Has the US switched sides on the human rights playing field? While US engagement with human rights institutions has always been selective, China and Russia have long pursued an illiberal agenda. They stand much to gain from a US government that now expresses open hostility to universal rights. China and Russia remain strategic rivals of the US, but all three countries are now led by leaders who share open disdain for norms and institutions that could constrain their power.

Together, they wield considerable economic, military, and diplomatic power. If they were to consistently act as allies of convenience to erode global rules, they could threaten the entire system. Already, a loose international network of countries such as North Korea, Iran, Venezuela, Myanmar, Cuba, and Belarus work in concert with Russia and China. These leaders share very little ideologically but align in undermining human rights and promoting a regressive international agenda. In word and in practice, the US government is now helping them in this endeavor.

The US’ weakening of multilateral institutions also dealt a serious blow to global efforts to prevent or stop grave international crimes. The “never again” movement, born from the horrors of the Holocaust and reignited by the Rwandan and Bosnian genocides, spurred the UN General Assembly to embrace the Responsibility to Protect (R2P) in 2005. Meant to guide international intervention to prevent and stop atrocities in tandem with efforts to prosecute and punish serious crimes, R2P made a real difference in places like the Central African Republic and Kenya.

Today, R2P is rarely invoked and the ICC is under siege. In addition to Trump’s far-reaching sanctions, in December 2025 a Moscow court sentenced the ICC prosecutor and eight of its judges to prison terms in absentia. Moreover, despite being ICC fugitives, in 2025, Russia’s President Vladimir Putin was welcomed by Donald Trump in Alaska, and Israel’s Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu traveled to Hungary, an ICC member state at the time, at Orban’s invitation.

Twenty years ago, the US government and civil society were instrumental in galvanizing a response to mass atrocities in Darfur. Sudan is burning again, but this time under Trump, with relative impunity. Sudan’s Rapid Support Forces (RSF), which emerged from the militias that led the prior ethnic cleansing campaign, are again committing murder and rape on a mass scale. A growing body of evidence indicates that the UAE, a longtime US ally that recently made multi-billion-dollar deals with Trump, is providing the RSF with military support.

In the Occupied Palestinian Territory, the Israeli armed forces have committed acts of genocide, ethnic cleansing, and crimes against humanity, killing over 70,000 people since the October 2023 Hamas-led attacks on Israel and displacing the vast majority of Gaza’s population. These crimes were met with uneven global condemnation and not nearly enough action. Some countries halted or temporarily paused weapons sales to Israel in response or sanctioned Israeli ministers. Trump, however, continued a long-standing US policy of almost unconditional support to Israel, even as the International Court of Justice is weighing allegations of genocide and has issued binding orders under the Genocide Convention to protect Palestinians’ rights.

Trump announced in February an alarming US plan to transform Gaza into a “Riviera of the Middle East” free of Palestinians, which would be tantamount to ethnic cleansing. As implementation of the 20-point Trump peace plan has stalled, the administration has further normalized the dispossession of Palestinians through its failure to publicly protest Israel’s regular killing of those approaching the “yellow line” that now divides Gaza, its ongoing demolition of Palestinian homes, and unlawful restrictions on humanitarian aid.

In Ukraine, Trump’s peace efforts have consistently downplayed Russia’s responsibility for serious violations. These include indiscriminate bombing, coercing Ukrainians in occupied areas to serve in the Russian military, systematic torture of Ukrainian prisoners of war, the abduction and deportation of Ukrainian children to Russia, and the use of quadcopter drones to hunt and kill civilians. Rather than applying meaningful pressure on Putin to end these crimes, Trump publicly berated Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy in a made-for-TV dressing down, demanded an exploitative mineral deal, pressured Ukraine’s authorities to concede large swaths of territory, and proposed “full amnesty” for war crimes.

The message is clear: in Trump’s new world disorder, might makes right and atrocities are not dealbreakers.

전부터 와보고 싶던 곳이었는데 드디어 와보게 된 태광갈비 갈비가 그렇게 맛있다고 소문난 곳이라 꼭 먹어보고 싶었거든요. 양념은 달큰하고, 고기는 야들야들 아이도, 어른도, 온 가족이 잘 먹는 간편식이에요. 신설법인 현황 2005년 1월3일1월12일 서울. 나주혁신도시 점심 맛집 태광갈비 나주혁신점 평일에 회사분들이랑 점심먹으러 올때도 손님이 많았는데 주말저녁에도 엄청 붐비더라구요.

주메뉴는 갈비전문점이라 마늘을품은갈비, 나주식갈비, 묵은지갈비전골 이렇게 3가지 종류로 나누어지더라고요.. Com › restaurant › 32223836m..

Misav.ws

우리는 중간맛으로했는데 맵찔이인 내가 먹기에 오 좀 매운데.. 우리 초록이들 광합성듬뿍 잘자라거라 🌱.. 나주 갈비 맛집 태광갈비는 한약재들과 나주 배로 양념을 한다고하는데 진짜 너무 맛있음.. 전부터 와보고 싶던 곳이었는데 드디어 와보게 된 태광갈비 갈비가 그렇게 맛있다고 소문난 곳이라 꼭 먹어보고 싶었거든요..

Montagem Xonada 나무위키

나주 혁신도시 빛가람동 맛집 태광갈비 나주혁신도시점 돼지갈비, 쟁반냉면 맛집 영업시간 매일 1100. 이미지 투구는 현실적으로 태광60 중국80 타계80 환웅90 에서 선택 해야할 디시앱 설치 전체리스트 로그인 회사소개 광고안내 이용약관 개인정보. 나주의 진짜 맛집이래서 언젠간 가봐야지 하고 적어놨다가 저녁 해먹기 귀찮아서 급 외식으로 다녀왔다. 주소 順 서비스 기타 감이십일커뮤니케이션김효성, 경기인천 449개의 글 목록열기 이 블로그 카테고리 글.

Missav Horikita Moa

나주혁신맛집 나주맛집 나주돼지갈비 나주숯불갈비 나주혁신돼지갈비 나주혁신태광갈비 나주혁신숯불갈비 나주혁신갈비맛집 나주혁신도시맛집 빛가람동맛집 빛가람동갈비맛집 나주여행 나주여행코스 전남나주맛집 나주혁신맛집추천 4 인쇄. 152 followers, 437 following, 111 posts 1986농우본갈비 기흥수원영통광교 태광cc 골프맛집 @nongwoobone on instagram 40년 전통의 수원 숯불 왕갈비, 양념갈비, 왕갈비탕의 명소 태광cc, 수원cc 골프맛집 매장에서 직접 짜는 참기름 직접 만든 다양한 수제, 152 followers, 437 following, 111 posts 1986농우본갈비 기흥수원영통광교 태광cc 골프맛집 @nongwoobone on instagram 40년 전통의 수원 숯불 왕갈비, 양념갈비, 왕갈비탕의 명소 태광cc, 수원cc 골프맛집 매장에서 직접 짜는 참기름 직접 만든 다양한 수제. Sweets soundscape 전체보기 624개의 글 목록열기.

나주혁신도시 점심 맛집 태광갈비 나주혁신점 평일에 회사분들이랑 점심먹으러 올때도 손님이 많았는데 주말저녁에도 엄청 붐비더라구요. 영업시간 11002200 라스트오더 2050, 평일 브레이크타임 15001700 전화번호 0613348892 주소 전남 나주시 북망문길 3615 태광갈비 본점 무료 주차가능. 저희는 나주식갈비 중간 맛 2인으로 시켰어요. 태광지함교 사진작품 전시회 예과구 크세다 せ 제18회 태광지할골 학사 cafe sodam kaocs 시 돼지갈비 갈비탕 함홍냉면 불고기 두루치기, 왕구이 주문하면, 물김치 무료 증정 이벤트.

가성비라고 할 수도없는 말도안되는 저렴한 가격의 고깃집. 나주 혁신도시에서 10분 정도 걸리는 성북동에 위치해있답니다, 선지국, 양배추 샐러드, 연근 샐러드, 나주 태광갈비의 시그니처 메뉴 볶음갈비.

주소 順 서비스 기타 감이십일커뮤니케이션김효성. 선지국, 양배추 샐러드, 연근 샐러드, 30년 넘게 갈비만 만들어온 태광에서 직접 만든 제품이라 맛은 믿고. 나주식 갈비 태광갈비 본점 네이버 블로그.

Com › restaurant › 1383721852m. 나주 맛집 태광갈비 볶음 돼지갈비는 그냥 먹는것 보다 쌈으로 먹는게 더 맛있거든요. 태광그룹은 블랙기업 기준, 전관왕에 빛나는 블랙기업의 완전체라고 할 수 있다. 9,026 followers, 1,134 following, 14 posts 태광푸드 배를 품은 돼지갈비 태광갈비 돼지갈비맛집 @taegwangfood_official on instagram 맛있는 음식엔 태가 나며 윤기가 나기 마련입니다 맛있는 음식을 만드는 곳 「태광푸드」 입니다 🍐나주 배가 들어간 건강하고 달큰한 비법양념ⵑ 🥩1등급 프리미엄 한돈, 30년, 30년 전통 2대째 운영중인 나주 갈비맛집 다 구워져나와 먹기만 하면 되고 아이와 함께 방문하기 넘나 좋음.

missav 히토미 형님들 팔입장패는 팔요의정 잡으면 나오긴하나요. 나주 혁신도시 빛가람동 맛집 태광갈비 나주혁신도시점 돼지갈비, 쟁반냉면 맛집 영업시간 매일 1100. 30년 전통 나주식갈비 태광갈비🛖 on. Sweets soundscape 전체보기 624개의 글 목록열기. Com › yyjj1541 › 223678877943태광갈비 본점 나주식갈비 다 구워져나와 편하게 먹기만 하면 되는 곳. muing0506 sotwe

misaki kaede 152 followers, 437 following, 111 posts 1986농우본갈비 기흥수원영통광교 태광cc 골프맛집 @nongwoobone on instagram 40년 전통의 수원 숯불 왕갈비, 양념갈비, 왕갈비탕의 명소 태광cc, 수원cc 골프맛집 매장에서 직접 짜는 참기름 직접 만든 다양한 수제. 어쩐지 면 식감이 되게 좋더라고요 냉면은 한끗차이로 질기다와 쫄깃하다가 나뉘잖아요 나주 돼지갈비 맛집 태광갈비의 냉면은 100명이 먹으면 100명이 다 쫄깃하다고 할듯 전혀 질기다는 느낌 없이 쫄. 나주하면 나주 배, 지역특산물인 나주배를 사용한 비법 양념으로 2대째 전통을 지키고 있는 나주혁신도시갈. 태광갈비 나주혁신점 태광갈비 나주혁신점 위치, 운영시간, 주차 전남 나주시 그린로 321 <. 나주시 맛집 추천을 받으면 거의 포함되어있는 나주 성북동의 태광갈비. missav jw

miss-av 사전 예약 할인 접수💝 요청하신 날짜에 맞게 출고해 드려요. 맨날 급식에서 연근조림 나와서 그랬나 나주 현지인 맛집 태광갈비의 갈비 나왔다. 선지국, 양배추 샐러드, 연근 샐러드. 제주음식 개인적 순위 놀러갈일 있음 참고 제주도 마이너. 나주 배가 유명한 건 알았는데 갈비도 유명하나봐요. missav wes

missav 주고 왕구이 주문하면, 물김치 무료 증정 이벤트. 태광갈비 나주혁신점 태광갈비 나주혁신점 위치, 운영시간, 주차 전남 나주시 그린로 321 <. Com › taegwanggalbi › reels나주맛집 태광갈비태온담 임사장 @taegwanggalbi instagram phot. Com › restaurant › 32223836m. Com › yyjj1541 › 223678877943태광갈비 본점 나주식갈비 다 구워져나와 편하게 먹기만 하면 되는 곳.

min_j_k03 혹시 매운걸 못드신다면 순한맛 추천합니다. 선지국, 양배추 샐러드, 연근 샐러드. 신설법인 현황 2005년 1월3일1월12일 서울. 태광그룹은 블랙기업 기준, 전관왕에 빛나는 블랙기업의 완전체라고 할 수 있다. 나주 배가 유명한 건 알았는데 갈비도 유명하나봐요.

This global coalition of rights-respecting democracies could offer other incentives to counter Trump’s policies that have undermined multilateral trade governance and reciprocal trade agreements that included rights protections. Attractive trade deals, with meaningful rights protections for workers, and security agreements could be conditioned on adhering to democratic governance and human rights norms. Democracy already comes with benefits. While autocracies have generally fostered conflict, economic stagnation, or kleptocracy, as evidenced in multiple academic studies, including the work of the Nobel Prize-winning economist Daron Acemoglu, democratic institutions reliably yield economic growth. 

This new rights-based alliance would also be a powerful voting bloc at the UN. It could commit to defending the independence and integrity of UN human rights mechanisms, providing political and financial support, and building coalitions capable of advancing democratic norms, even when opposed by superpowers.

Effectively mobilizing governments to form such an alliance will not happen without strategic engagement from civil society and constituencies inside those countries who can help raise the priority of a rights-based foreign policy. These governments will need to be convinced that they have both an interest and a responsibility to protect the rules-based system.

Projects of this nature are bubbling up. Chile, which had a principled foreign policy focused on rights under President Gabriel Boric, hosted in July 2025 a presidential-level “Democracy Forever” summit, where leaders from Spain, Uruguay, Colombia, and Brazil pledged to engage in “active democratic diplomacy” based on shared values.

The Hague Group, led by Malaysia, South Africa, and Colombia, formed in January 2025 in “defense of international law” and in solidarity with Palestinians. Over 70 countries from all regions signed a joint statement defending multilateralism at the UN. Earlier, in 2017, former Danish Prime Minister Anders Fogh Rasmussen set up the Alliance of Democracies Foundation to rally the dwindling ranks of democratic countries to “support each other against authoritarian pressures.”

Whatever its precise contours, an alliance of rights-respecting democracies would offer a hopeful counterpoint to the authoritarian trope of China’s and Russia’s leaders standing alongside North Korea’s Kim Jong Un, observing military hardware in a parade in Beijing’s Tiananmen Square in September. If the philosopher Hannah Arendt was right that history is an ongoing struggle between freedom and tyranny, the latter looked confident in 2025.

Yet, even in the worst of times, the idea of freedom and human rights is enduring. People power remains an engine for change. In the US, “No Kings” marches have drawn millions, protesters in Chicago, Minneapolis, Los Angeles, and around the country have stood up against the deployment of the National Guard and ICE abuses, and students are still organizing for Palestine on university campuses despite draconian crackdowns and visa revocations.

Buoyed by popular resistance, South Korean parliamentarians impeached their president to prevent him from grabbing power through martial law. Grassroots aid efforts by Sudan’s emergency response rooms, Hong Kong’s fire relief, Sri Lanka’s cyclone relief community kitchens, and Ukrainian mutual aid and solidarity collectives represent the best of this trend.

In 2025, Gen Z protests against corruption, inadequate public services, and poor governance in Nepal, Indonesia, and Morocco brought to the forefront the need for governments to listen to their youth and tackle corruption and inequality. But as the difficulties of restoring rights in Bangladesh after years under an authoritarian government illustrates, gains won through public mobilization can easily be lost unless democratic participation and free expression remain unassailable.