Will Human Rights Survive a Trumpian World?

Authoritarian Advances Threaten Rules-Based Order

The global human rights system is in peril. Under relentless pressure from US President Donald Trump, and persistently undermined by China and Russia, the rules-based international order is being crushed, threatening to take with it the architecture human rights defenders have come to rely on to advance norms and protect freedoms. To defy this trend, governments that still value human rights, alongside social movements, civil society, and international institutions, need to form a strategic alliance to push back.

To be fair, the downward spiral predated Trump’s reelection. The democratic wave that began over 50 years ago has given way to what scholars term a “democratic recession.” Democracy is now back to 1985 levels according to some metrics, with 72 percent of the world’s population now living under autocracy. Russia and China are less free today than 20 years ago. And so is the United States.

Of course, democracy is not a panacea for human rights violations; the US and other longtime democracies have their own histories of colonial crimes, racism, abusive justice systems, and wartime atrocities. More recently, authoritarian leaders have exploited public mistrust and anger to win elections and then dismantled the very institutions that brought them to power. Democratic institutions are crucial to represent the will of the people and keep power in check. It’s no surprise that whenever democracy is undermined, rights are too, as evident in recent years in India, Türkiye, the Philippines, El Salvador, and Hungary.

In this context, 2025 may be seen as a tipping point. In just 12 months, the Trump administration has carried out a broad assault on key pillars of US democracy and the global rules-based order, which the US, despite inconsistencies, was, with other states, instrumental in helping to establish.

In short order, Trump’s second-term administration has undermined trust in the sanctity of elections, reduced government accountability, gutted food assistance and healthcare subsidies, attacked judicial independence, defied court orders, rolled back women’s rights, obstructed access to abortion care, undermined remedies for racial harm, terminated programs mandating accessibility for people with disabilities, punished free speech, stripped protections from trans and intersex people, eroded privacy, and used government power to intimidate political opponents, the media, law firms, universities, civil society, and even comedians.

Claiming a risk of “civilizational erasure” in Europe and leaning on racist tropes to cast entire populations as unwelcome in the US, the Trump administration has embraced policies and rhetoric that align with white nationalist ideology. Immigrants and asylum seekers have been subjected to inhumane conditions and degrading treatment; 32 died in US Immigration and Customs Enforcement custody in 2025, and as of mid-January 2026, an additional 4 have died. Masked immigration enforcement agents have targeted people of color, using excessive force, terrorizing communities, wrongfully arresting scores of citizens, and, most recently, unjustifiably killing two people in Minneapolis, whose deaths Human Rights Watch has documented.

The US president of course has the authority to tighten US borders and enforce stricter immigration policies. The administration is not, however, entitled to deny legal process to asylum seekers, mistreat undocumented migrants, or unlawfully discriminate. In a well-functioning democracy, no electoral mandate should supersede domestic legislation, constitutional protections, or international human rights law. Trump’s team has repeatedly bypassed these guardrails.

The violations have not stopped at the border. The Trump administration used a 1798 law to send hundreds of Venezuelan migrants to an infamous prison in El Salvador, where they were tortured and sexually abused. Its blatantly unlawful strikes on boats in the Caribbean and the Pacific extrajudicially killed more than 120 people whom Trump claims were drug traffickers.

After the US attacked Venezuela and apprehended its president, Nicolás Maduro, and his wife, Cilia Flores, Trump claimed the US would “run” the country and control its vast oil reserves. Despite paying lip service to human rights concerns under Maduro at the United Nations, Trump has worked with the same repressive apparatus to further US interests. Many Western allies have chosen to stay silent about these lawless moves, perhaps fearing erratic tariffs and blowback to their alliances.

Trump’s foreign policy has upended the foundations of the rules-based order that seeks to advance democracy and human rights, even if imperfectly.

Trump has boasted that he doesn’t “need international law” as a constraint, only his “own morality.” His administration has politicized the US State Department’s annual human rights report, stepped away from the global prohibition on antipersonnel landmines, voiced support for rewriting international rules on asylum, and skipped the UN’s Universal Periodic Review of the US’ human rights record.

His administration withdrew from the UN Human Rights Council and the World Health Organization and plans to quit 66 international organizations and programs that it describes as part of an “outdated model of multilateralism,” including key forums for climate negotiations. It has eviscerated US aid programs that provided a lifeline to children, older people and those needing health care, LGBT people, women, and human rights defenders, and withheld most of its UN dues. 

Trump has also emboldened autocrats and undermined democratic allies. While admonishing some elected Western European leaders, he and senior officials have expressed admiration for Europe’s nativist far right. He has favored autocrats such as Hungary’s Prime Minister Viktor Orban, Türkiye’s President Recep Tayyip Erdoğan, and El Salvador’s President Nayib Bukele, while continuing decades of US support to Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman and Egypt’s President Abdel Fattah al-Sisi.

His administration has unjustifiably imposed sanctions to punish respected Palestinian human rights organizations, the International Criminal Court’s (ICC) prosecutor and many of its judges, a UN special rapporteur, and for several months, a Brazilian Supreme Court judge and his wife.

The institutional response in the US to Trump’s power grabs has been shockingly muted. Much of Congress, controlled by his own party, has not challenged his supercharged expansion of executive power. The leaders of the US’ most powerful technology companies have made significant donations and sought to placate the president. Some big law firms and prestigious universities have made deals rather than assert their independence, and some media organizations seem afraid to attract the president’s ire.

Has the US switched sides on the human rights playing field? While US engagement with human rights institutions has always been selective, China and Russia have long pursued an illiberal agenda. They stand much to gain from a US government that now expresses open hostility to universal rights. China and Russia remain strategic rivals of the US, but all three countries are now led by leaders who share open disdain for norms and institutions that could constrain their power.

Together, they wield considerable economic, military, and diplomatic power. If they were to consistently act as allies of convenience to erode global rules, they could threaten the entire system. Already, a loose international network of countries such as North Korea, Iran, Venezuela, Myanmar, Cuba, and Belarus work in concert with Russia and China. These leaders share very little ideologically but align in undermining human rights and promoting a regressive international agenda. In word and in practice, the US government is now helping them in this endeavor.

The US’ weakening of multilateral institutions also dealt a serious blow to global efforts to prevent or stop grave international crimes. The “never again” movement, born from the horrors of the Holocaust and reignited by the Rwandan and Bosnian genocides, spurred the UN General Assembly to embrace the Responsibility to Protect (R2P) in 2005. Meant to guide international intervention to prevent and stop atrocities in tandem with efforts to prosecute and punish serious crimes, R2P made a real difference in places like the Central African Republic and Kenya.

Today, R2P is rarely invoked and the ICC is under siege. In addition to Trump’s far-reaching sanctions, in December 2025 a Moscow court sentenced the ICC prosecutor and eight of its judges to prison terms in absentia. Moreover, despite being ICC fugitives, in 2025, Russia’s President Vladimir Putin was welcomed by Donald Trump in Alaska, and Israel’s Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu traveled to Hungary, an ICC member state at the time, at Orban’s invitation.

Twenty years ago, the US government and civil society were instrumental in galvanizing a response to mass atrocities in Darfur. Sudan is burning again, but this time under Trump, with relative impunity. Sudan’s Rapid Support Forces (RSF), which emerged from the militias that led the prior ethnic cleansing campaign, are again committing murder and rape on a mass scale. A growing body of evidence indicates that the UAE, a longtime US ally that recently made multi-billion-dollar deals with Trump, is providing the RSF with military support.

In the Occupied Palestinian Territory, the Israeli armed forces have committed acts of genocide, ethnic cleansing, and crimes against humanity, killing over 70,000 people since the October 2023 Hamas-led attacks on Israel and displacing the vast majority of Gaza’s population. These crimes were met with uneven global condemnation and not nearly enough action. Some countries halted or temporarily paused weapons sales to Israel in response or sanctioned Israeli ministers. Trump, however, continued a long-standing US policy of almost unconditional support to Israel, even as the International Court of Justice is weighing allegations of genocide and has issued binding orders under the Genocide Convention to protect Palestinians’ rights.

Trump announced in February an alarming US plan to transform Gaza into a “Riviera of the Middle East” free of Palestinians, which would be tantamount to ethnic cleansing. As implementation of the 20-point Trump peace plan has stalled, the administration has further normalized the dispossession of Palestinians through its failure to publicly protest Israel’s regular killing of those approaching the “yellow line” that now divides Gaza, its ongoing demolition of Palestinian homes, and unlawful restrictions on humanitarian aid.

In Ukraine, Trump’s peace efforts have consistently downplayed Russia’s responsibility for serious violations. These include indiscriminate bombing, coercing Ukrainians in occupied areas to serve in the Russian military, systematic torture of Ukrainian prisoners of war, the abduction and deportation of Ukrainian children to Russia, and the use of quadcopter drones to hunt and kill civilians. Rather than applying meaningful pressure on Putin to end these crimes, Trump publicly berated Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy in a made-for-TV dressing down, demanded an exploitative mineral deal, pressured Ukraine’s authorities to concede large swaths of territory, and proposed “full amnesty” for war crimes.

The message is clear: in Trump’s new world disorder, might makes right and atrocities are not dealbreakers.

예전에 이런 글을 올렸었죠갤럭시 스토어 × 푸리나 & 느비예트 콜라보에 관한 글이였습니다근데 그것이 실제로 일어났습니다 ㅋㅋ비록 주인공이 제가 예측한 푸리나 & 느비예트가 아니긴 하지만 폰타인 캐릭터라는 점은 같네요이 제품을 구매하려고 하시는 분들을 위해 호환 제품과 간단한. ㅋㅋㅋ 오늘도 어김없이 옆에서 깍두기로 휩쓸고 다니는 울 기쁨이 그래이것도 다 노출이니라ㅋㅋㅋㅋ. ✓방배동 삼호아파트 종합상가 내 1층. 세 글자로 동시가 되고, 문장이 되는 중국어.

Candy Love 디시

Chanmimi789 Bj

Dc 더케이

Com › postview원신 라이오슬리 성유물 무기 조합 서브탐측유닛 돌파재료 파밍위치.. 많은 라오스 사람들이 라오스어와 태국어 모두 사용하고 있다.. 원신 라이오슬리 성유물 무기 조합 서브탐측유닛 돌파재료 위치 오늘 원신의 새로운 5성 캐릭터 라이오슬리.. 정말 다양한 곳에 사용되는 단어인데요 날씨가 덥다, 날씨가 춥다, 비가 온다..

라슬이를 어떻게 키워야할지 궁금하시다면 꼭 읽어 주세요결론추천 무기5성 무기：현금 흐름 감독＞속세의 자물쇠＞툴레이툴라의 기억＞천공의 두루마리＞사풍 원서4성 무기：음유시인의 악장5재＞일월의 정수5재＞끝없는, The capital is vientiane lao viangchan, located on the mekong river in the northern portion of the country. Overall, the country extends about 650 miles 1,050 km from northwest to southeast. 틀자마자 라오슬남정네가 빵댕이를 흔들어대서 매우 당황했슴니다. 중국어라오슬 경기도 안양시 동안구 호계동, 라이오슬리 5성 얼음 온필드딜러얼음 법구 온필드 딜러 되시겠다.

C8h11n02 온팬

출시전의 가이드이니 언제나 변경과 오류가 있을 수 있습니다. 프롤로그 블로그 안부 중국어 주제별 단어 모음 10개의 글 목록열기. Com › ybmkd › 223425330605ybm건대 중국어_ 부팅동중국어 롱쮸 라오슬 씨에씨에. 오늘도톡톡중국어 찐라오슈정숙쌤 고3 高三 gāosān 까오싼 재수생 复读生 fùdúshēng 푸두셩 수험생 考生 kǎoshēng 카오셩 대학입시 수능 高考 gāokǎo 까오카오 대입시험 보다 参加高考cānjiā gāokǎo 찬지아 까오카오 수험표 准考证zhǔnkǎozhèng 쥰카오쪙 수험번호.

danimaru sex Hours ago 라오스는 메콩강이 흐르는 평화로운 풍경과 불교 문화의 정수를 간직한 동남아시아의 유일한 내륙국입니다. 아주 쉬워서 중국어 배워본 적 없는 분들도 쉽게 쉽게 따라할 수 있는, 그런 간단한 인사말만 준비해 보았습니다. 갑자기 왜 다들 라오슬을 뽑고싶어하는거임. 자료는 언제나 그렇듯이 wfp, kqm디코쪽 자료를 참고했습니다. 라오슬은 딱히 편하지도 않고 재미도 느비에 비교해선 그닥이고 심지어 엉덩이도 존나 잘 보이네. ca-102 chae ah av

ca-202 missav 안녕하세요 까오까오씽씽 @지민입니다 오늘은 간단한 중국어인사말을 소개해드리려고 해요. Find top attractions and tips. Com › travelguide › destination라오스 자유여행 가이드 2026년 인기 명소, 맛집, 여행 코스 총정리. 중국어를 배워서 졸업후 중국에서 일을해야겠다. 원신 라이오슬리 성유물 무기 조합 서브탐측유닛 돌파재료 위치 오늘 원신의 새로운 5성 캐릭터 라이오슬리. dearhal kbj

campus pikpak Com › travelguide › destination라오스 자유여행 가이드 2026년 인기 명소, 맛집, 여행 코스 총정리. 세 글자로 동시가 되고, 문장이 되는 중국어. 원신 라오슬 성유물작 선방했다 시계는 주절먹급인데 성배가 음 로그인이 필요합니다. 원신 라이오슬리 성유물 스펙 재료, 육성, 무기, 특성, 파티. 교과서적인 인사말도 있고 현실 생활에서 사용하는 인사말도 있는데 함께 배워보도록 해요. cme 만기일

chicke iii hitomi Find top attractions and tips. 문화적으로 언어적으로 오슬라비에나 프리울리 베네찌아 지역 사람들은. 제가 한국어 발음 때문에 shi을 슬 이라고 표기했는데, 이 발음은 처음 배우실 때 아주 집중해서 많이 연습하는 것을 추천합니다. 북서쪽으로는 미얀마와 중화인민공화국, 동쪽으로는 베트남, 남쪽으로는 캄보디아, 서쪽으로는 태국과 국경을 접하고 있는 국가로서 동남아시아의 유일한 내륙국이다. 이어지는 여정은 누구에게나 특별한 경험이 될 거예요.

cfake 프롤로그 블로그 안부 중국어 주제별 단어 모음 10개의 글 목록열기. 라이오슬리 5성 얼음 온필드딜러얼음 법구 온필드 딜러 되시겠다. 이번 여름방학을 알차게 보내고 싶은 초등학생들을 대상으로 한달간 중국어 입문과정 특강을 오픈합니다 심심한 방학기간을 중국어를 배우며 알차게. Hsk5급 3명다 합격 축하해요 라오슬 챠오 까오씽오. 제가 한국어 발음 때문에 shi을 슬 이라고 표기했는데, 이 발음은 처음 배우실 때 아주 집중해서 많이 연습하는 것을 추천합니다.

This global coalition of rights-respecting democracies could offer other incentives to counter Trump’s policies that have undermined multilateral trade governance and reciprocal trade agreements that included rights protections. Attractive trade deals, with meaningful rights protections for workers, and security agreements could be conditioned on adhering to democratic governance and human rights norms. Democracy already comes with benefits. While autocracies have generally fostered conflict, economic stagnation, or kleptocracy, as evidenced in multiple academic studies, including the work of the Nobel Prize-winning economist Daron Acemoglu, democratic institutions reliably yield economic growth. 

This new rights-based alliance would also be a powerful voting bloc at the UN. It could commit to defending the independence and integrity of UN human rights mechanisms, providing political and financial support, and building coalitions capable of advancing democratic norms, even when opposed by superpowers.

Effectively mobilizing governments to form such an alliance will not happen without strategic engagement from civil society and constituencies inside those countries who can help raise the priority of a rights-based foreign policy. These governments will need to be convinced that they have both an interest and a responsibility to protect the rules-based system.

Projects of this nature are bubbling up. Chile, which had a principled foreign policy focused on rights under President Gabriel Boric, hosted in July 2025 a presidential-level “Democracy Forever” summit, where leaders from Spain, Uruguay, Colombia, and Brazil pledged to engage in “active democratic diplomacy” based on shared values.

The Hague Group, led by Malaysia, South Africa, and Colombia, formed in January 2025 in “defense of international law” and in solidarity with Palestinians. Over 70 countries from all regions signed a joint statement defending multilateralism at the UN. Earlier, in 2017, former Danish Prime Minister Anders Fogh Rasmussen set up the Alliance of Democracies Foundation to rally the dwindling ranks of democratic countries to “support each other against authoritarian pressures.”

Whatever its precise contours, an alliance of rights-respecting democracies would offer a hopeful counterpoint to the authoritarian trope of China’s and Russia’s leaders standing alongside North Korea’s Kim Jong Un, observing military hardware in a parade in Beijing’s Tiananmen Square in September. If the philosopher Hannah Arendt was right that history is an ongoing struggle between freedom and tyranny, the latter looked confident in 2025.

Yet, even in the worst of times, the idea of freedom and human rights is enduring. People power remains an engine for change. In the US, “No Kings” marches have drawn millions, protesters in Chicago, Minneapolis, Los Angeles, and around the country have stood up against the deployment of the National Guard and ICE abuses, and students are still organizing for Palestine on university campuses despite draconian crackdowns and visa revocations.

Buoyed by popular resistance, South Korean parliamentarians impeached their president to prevent him from grabbing power through martial law. Grassroots aid efforts by Sudan’s emergency response rooms, Hong Kong’s fire relief, Sri Lanka’s cyclone relief community kitchens, and Ukrainian mutual aid and solidarity collectives represent the best of this trend.

In 2025, Gen Z protests against corruption, inadequate public services, and poor governance in Nepal, Indonesia, and Morocco brought to the forefront the need for governments to listen to their youth and tackle corruption and inequality. But as the difficulties of restoring rights in Bangladesh after years under an authoritarian government illustrates, gains won through public mobilization can easily be lost unless democratic participation and free expression remain unassailable.