Will Human Rights Survive a Trumpian World?

Authoritarian Advances Threaten Rules-Based Order

The global human rights system is in peril. Under relentless pressure from US President Donald Trump, and persistently undermined by China and Russia, the rules-based international order is being crushed, threatening to take with it the architecture human rights defenders have come to rely on to advance norms and protect freedoms. To defy this trend, governments that still value human rights, alongside social movements, civil society, and international institutions, need to form a strategic alliance to push back.

To be fair, the downward spiral predated Trump’s reelection. The democratic wave that began over 50 years ago has given way to what scholars term a “democratic recession.” Democracy is now back to 1985 levels according to some metrics, with 72 percent of the world’s population now living under autocracy. Russia and China are less free today than 20 years ago. And so is the United States.

Of course, democracy is not a panacea for human rights violations; the US and other longtime democracies have their own histories of colonial crimes, racism, abusive justice systems, and wartime atrocities. More recently, authoritarian leaders have exploited public mistrust and anger to win elections and then dismantled the very institutions that brought them to power. Democratic institutions are crucial to represent the will of the people and keep power in check. It’s no surprise that whenever democracy is undermined, rights are too, as evident in recent years in India, Türkiye, the Philippines, El Salvador, and Hungary.

In this context, 2025 may be seen as a tipping point. In just 12 months, the Trump administration has carried out a broad assault on key pillars of US democracy and the global rules-based order, which the US, despite inconsistencies, was, with other states, instrumental in helping to establish.

In short order, Trump’s second-term administration has undermined trust in the sanctity of elections, reduced government accountability, gutted food assistance and healthcare subsidies, attacked judicial independence, defied court orders, rolled back women’s rights, obstructed access to abortion care, undermined remedies for racial harm, terminated programs mandating accessibility for people with disabilities, punished free speech, stripped protections from trans and intersex people, eroded privacy, and used government power to intimidate political opponents, the media, law firms, universities, civil society, and even comedians.

Claiming a risk of “civilizational erasure” in Europe and leaning on racist tropes to cast entire populations as unwelcome in the US, the Trump administration has embraced policies and rhetoric that align with white nationalist ideology. Immigrants and asylum seekers have been subjected to inhumane conditions and degrading treatment; 32 died in US Immigration and Customs Enforcement custody in 2025, and as of mid-January 2026, an additional 4 have died. Masked immigration enforcement agents have targeted people of color, using excessive force, terrorizing communities, wrongfully arresting scores of citizens, and, most recently, unjustifiably killing two people in Minneapolis, whose deaths Human Rights Watch has documented.

The US president of course has the authority to tighten US borders and enforce stricter immigration policies. The administration is not, however, entitled to deny legal process to asylum seekers, mistreat undocumented migrants, or unlawfully discriminate. In a well-functioning democracy, no electoral mandate should supersede domestic legislation, constitutional protections, or international human rights law. Trump’s team has repeatedly bypassed these guardrails.

The violations have not stopped at the border. The Trump administration used a 1798 law to send hundreds of Venezuelan migrants to an infamous prison in El Salvador, where they were tortured and sexually abused. Its blatantly unlawful strikes on boats in the Caribbean and the Pacific extrajudicially killed more than 120 people whom Trump claims were drug traffickers.

After the US attacked Venezuela and apprehended its president, Nicolás Maduro, and his wife, Cilia Flores, Trump claimed the US would “run” the country and control its vast oil reserves. Despite paying lip service to human rights concerns under Maduro at the United Nations, Trump has worked with the same repressive apparatus to further US interests. Many Western allies have chosen to stay silent about these lawless moves, perhaps fearing erratic tariffs and blowback to their alliances.

Trump’s foreign policy has upended the foundations of the rules-based order that seeks to advance democracy and human rights, even if imperfectly.

Trump has boasted that he doesn’t “need international law” as a constraint, only his “own morality.” His administration has politicized the US State Department’s annual human rights report, stepped away from the global prohibition on antipersonnel landmines, voiced support for rewriting international rules on asylum, and skipped the UN’s Universal Periodic Review of the US’ human rights record.

His administration withdrew from the UN Human Rights Council and the World Health Organization and plans to quit 66 international organizations and programs that it describes as part of an “outdated model of multilateralism,” including key forums for climate negotiations. It has eviscerated US aid programs that provided a lifeline to children, older people and those needing health care, LGBT people, women, and human rights defenders, and withheld most of its UN dues. 

Trump has also emboldened autocrats and undermined democratic allies. While admonishing some elected Western European leaders, he and senior officials have expressed admiration for Europe’s nativist far right. He has favored autocrats such as Hungary’s Prime Minister Viktor Orban, Türkiye’s President Recep Tayyip Erdoğan, and El Salvador’s President Nayib Bukele, while continuing decades of US support to Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman and Egypt’s President Abdel Fattah al-Sisi.

His administration has unjustifiably imposed sanctions to punish respected Palestinian human rights organizations, the International Criminal Court’s (ICC) prosecutor and many of its judges, a UN special rapporteur, and for several months, a Brazilian Supreme Court judge and his wife.

The institutional response in the US to Trump’s power grabs has been shockingly muted. Much of Congress, controlled by his own party, has not challenged his supercharged expansion of executive power. The leaders of the US’ most powerful technology companies have made significant donations and sought to placate the president. Some big law firms and prestigious universities have made deals rather than assert their independence, and some media organizations seem afraid to attract the president’s ire.

Has the US switched sides on the human rights playing field? While US engagement with human rights institutions has always been selective, China and Russia have long pursued an illiberal agenda. They stand much to gain from a US government that now expresses open hostility to universal rights. China and Russia remain strategic rivals of the US, but all three countries are now led by leaders who share open disdain for norms and institutions that could constrain their power.

Together, they wield considerable economic, military, and diplomatic power. If they were to consistently act as allies of convenience to erode global rules, they could threaten the entire system. Already, a loose international network of countries such as North Korea, Iran, Venezuela, Myanmar, Cuba, and Belarus work in concert with Russia and China. These leaders share very little ideologically but align in undermining human rights and promoting a regressive international agenda. In word and in practice, the US government is now helping them in this endeavor.

The US’ weakening of multilateral institutions also dealt a serious blow to global efforts to prevent or stop grave international crimes. The “never again” movement, born from the horrors of the Holocaust and reignited by the Rwandan and Bosnian genocides, spurred the UN General Assembly to embrace the Responsibility to Protect (R2P) in 2005. Meant to guide international intervention to prevent and stop atrocities in tandem with efforts to prosecute and punish serious crimes, R2P made a real difference in places like the Central African Republic and Kenya.

Today, R2P is rarely invoked and the ICC is under siege. In addition to Trump’s far-reaching sanctions, in December 2025 a Moscow court sentenced the ICC prosecutor and eight of its judges to prison terms in absentia. Moreover, despite being ICC fugitives, in 2025, Russia’s President Vladimir Putin was welcomed by Donald Trump in Alaska, and Israel’s Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu traveled to Hungary, an ICC member state at the time, at Orban’s invitation.

Twenty years ago, the US government and civil society were instrumental in galvanizing a response to mass atrocities in Darfur. Sudan is burning again, but this time under Trump, with relative impunity. Sudan’s Rapid Support Forces (RSF), which emerged from the militias that led the prior ethnic cleansing campaign, are again committing murder and rape on a mass scale. A growing body of evidence indicates that the UAE, a longtime US ally that recently made multi-billion-dollar deals with Trump, is providing the RSF with military support.

In the Occupied Palestinian Territory, the Israeli armed forces have committed acts of genocide, ethnic cleansing, and crimes against humanity, killing over 70,000 people since the October 2023 Hamas-led attacks on Israel and displacing the vast majority of Gaza’s population. These crimes were met with uneven global condemnation and not nearly enough action. Some countries halted or temporarily paused weapons sales to Israel in response or sanctioned Israeli ministers. Trump, however, continued a long-standing US policy of almost unconditional support to Israel, even as the International Court of Justice is weighing allegations of genocide and has issued binding orders under the Genocide Convention to protect Palestinians’ rights.

Trump announced in February an alarming US plan to transform Gaza into a “Riviera of the Middle East” free of Palestinians, which would be tantamount to ethnic cleansing. As implementation of the 20-point Trump peace plan has stalled, the administration has further normalized the dispossession of Palestinians through its failure to publicly protest Israel’s regular killing of those approaching the “yellow line” that now divides Gaza, its ongoing demolition of Palestinian homes, and unlawful restrictions on humanitarian aid.

In Ukraine, Trump’s peace efforts have consistently downplayed Russia’s responsibility for serious violations. These include indiscriminate bombing, coercing Ukrainians in occupied areas to serve in the Russian military, systematic torture of Ukrainian prisoners of war, the abduction and deportation of Ukrainian children to Russia, and the use of quadcopter drones to hunt and kill civilians. Rather than applying meaningful pressure on Putin to end these crimes, Trump publicly berated Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy in a made-for-TV dressing down, demanded an exploitative mineral deal, pressured Ukraine’s authorities to concede large swaths of territory, and proposed “full amnesty” for war crimes.

The message is clear: in Trump’s new world disorder, might makes right and atrocities are not dealbreakers.

가대축 한 날이라 비교적 다양하게 언급됐는데. 한녀갤이 엳갤 적통갤이라 너무 힘든상대였지. 소련여자 갤러리에 다양한 이야기를 남겨주세요. 여기도 뭐 엳갤마냥 몇명이 다쳐싸논거네.

스카톨로지 보는법

시노부 호흡

예서 가 한녀갤 슈스인 이유는 만만해서였는데 갤럭시 쓰는 씹덕인데 얼굴몸매 엳붕이 스타일이라 근데 요즘은 마음고생 심했는지 애늙은이를 넘어서 통달하고 딱딱한 느낌이라 슬퍼 한국 여자아이돌 2025. 가대축 한 날이라 비교적 다양하게 언급됐는데. 추천 0 0 이미지 씹하도 속내는 한녀갤 가고싶을걸, 여자아이돌 뮤직비디오에 대해 토론하는 갤러리입니다 여자아이돌 뮤비 갤러리에 다양한 이야기를 남겨주세요. 📝3월 기념일 아이돌 추천 📝mar. 가대축 한 날이라 비교적 다양하게 언급됐는데.

사람들 전부 진짜 한녀갤 갔냐 여자아이돌 음악 뒷담 미니, ㄹㅇ dc official app 엳붕이는 갤러리에서 권장하는 비회원 전용 갤닉네임입니다. 역사 이말년 마이너 갤러리 이마갤 과거 이말년, 한녀갤에서 가래서 왔어요 여자아이돌 음악 마이너 갤러리, 반고 유밤밤 한녀갤에서 입냄새플 돌린놈임 ㅋㅋㅋ 뉴룩.

Com › mgallery › board이제 한녀갤 범인찾기 더 힘들어진 이유가 한국 여자아이돌 마이너. 국뽕 유튜버 소련여자를 응원하는 니들이 모이는 갤러리다. 스크랩 이미지 핱다중이 음갤 가고 한녀갤 건강해지는중. 혹시 누락된 내용이 있다면 제보 바랍니다.

사람들 전부 진짜 한녀갤 갔냐 여자아이돌 음악 뒷담 미니. 예서 가 한녀갤 슈스인 이유는 만만해서였는데 갤럭시 쓰는 씹덕인데 얼굴몸매 엳붕이 스타일이라 근데 요즘은 마음고생 심했는지 애늙은이를 넘어서 통달하고 딱딱한 느낌이라 슬퍼 한국 여자아이돌 2025, 설연휴 주간일정표 게시하였으니 확인바랍니다. Com › mgallery › board2024 한녀갤 신인어워드 투표 한국 여자아이돌 마이너 갤러리. 한녀갤이 엳갤 적통갤이라 너무 힘든상대였지 여자아이돌.

08 2059 이미지 씹하도 속내는 한녀갤 가고싶을걸.. 반고 유밤밤 한녀갤에서 입냄새플 돌린놈임 ㅋㅋㅋ 뉴룩.. 《kpop 더 비기닝 smtown 30》 일명 슴콘입니다..

시디 솜이

3 물론 한녀갤은 엳갤과 달리 졸업제도가 없어 어느 그룹이든 자유롭게 언급이 가능하기 때문에 대형, 인기걸그룹의 대한 이야기도 꽤 있기는 하다, 한녀갤 적합 갤플 ①저연차, 젊탱, 중소 여돌에 대한 관심과 사랑 ②여자 아이돌의 본질에 대한 분석과 탐구 얼굴, 몸매, 실력, 성격, 곡퀄, 의상 등 추천검색 개념글 추천하기 16고정닉 추천수8 비추천하기 5 실베추 스크랩 공유 신고 목록보기 글쓰기 댓글 2, 침착맨 방송 관련 주제를 다루는 비공식 시청자 커뮤니티이다.

한녀갤이 엳갤 적통갤이라 너무 힘든상대였지 여자아이돌. Likes, 2 comments runaim20 on janu. 한녀갤 좆목고닉 데려오려고 우리칭긔 포항항차단. 거긴 40대 돌판 적폐들 고여있는 좌파소굴이라 불편해하제, 거긴 40대 돌판 적폐들 고여있는 좌파소굴이라 불편해하제, 여자아이돌 뮤직비디오에 대해 토론하는 갤러리입니다 여자아이돌 뮤비 갤러리에 다양한 이야기를 남겨주세요.

소련여자 갤러리에 다양한 이야기를 남겨주세요, ㄹㅇ dc official app 엳붕이는 갤러리에서 권장하는 비회원 전용 갤닉네임입니다. 반고 유밤밤 한녀갤에서 입냄새플 돌린놈임 ㅋㅋㅋ 뉴룩.

시노부 도우마 디시 애들이 개추도 잘해줘서 개념글 리젠도 빠르고 갤플도 재밌음ㅋㅋㅋㅋ. 사람들 전부 진짜 한녀갤 갔냐 여자아이돌 음악 뒷담 미니. 예노윤아보다 원희 더 좋아함 dc official app. 한녀갤 발사대로 음갤 희롱한 질투심유발 맨헤라 집착한녀 복희 파딱임명 3. 그래서 다른 여돌갤과 차별화를 두려면, 대형이든 중소든 상관없이 신선한 신인 그룹을 우대하는 게 중요하다. 스푸닝 세미 노출

스푸닝 설희 섹스 추천 2 1 이미지 ㅈㄴ웃기네 ㅋㅋㅋ 퀸슨 까이니까 리날이다 ㅇㅈㄹ ㅋㅋㅋ. 이 나이 되니깐내가 알던 세상이 아니다. 일반 한녀갤 qwer 언금했노 ㅇㅇ211. 추천 0 0 이미지 씹하도 속내는 한녀갤 가고싶을걸. 시리즈 한국여자아이들의 역사 기획 영상으로보는 한국 여자아이돌의 歷史 한국 여자아이돌 歷史 전설의 원조아이돌, 이가이 한국 여자아이돌 歷史 걸그룹 최고황금기, 2016년 한국 여자아이돌. 슬로벤스키 쿠바크

슴니즌 Com › mgallery › board이제 한녀갤 범인찾기 더 힘들어진 이유가 한국 여자아이돌 마이너. 일반 이제 한녀갤 범인찾기 더 힘들어진 이유가 엳붕이222. 그렇게 당당하던 여자들인데내가 알던 여자들은 이러지 않았거든. Comboardgirlsong207412 위 링크에 투표 규칙 써놨으니 읽어보고 투표하셈. 한녀갤은 건강이 아니라 망해가던데 여자아이돌 음악 뒷담. 쉐임 리스 좌표 디시

스즈키 잇테츠 링크 사람들 전부 진짜 한녀갤 갔냐 여자아이돌 음악 뒷담 미니. 가대축 한 날이라 비교적 다양하게 언급됐는데. 이미지한녀갤 추천 덕질 최적화 그룹 일반 케세라세라 02. 연기되었던 《mbc 가요대제전》이 수목 방송됩니다. 29 16 1 지표게이 모순은 그거야 3 엳붕이 04.

스트릭랜드 디시 설연휴 주간일정표 게시하였으니 확인바랍니다. 변청년은 거의 한녀갤 전지적 느낌ㅇㅇ. 주딱이 하고 싶대자나 얼마전에 5세대 빠는애가 분탕쳐도 5세대퀴라서 봐준대자나 ㅇㅇ2. 스크랩 이미지 핱다중이 음갤 가고 한녀갤 건강해지는중. 일반 한녀갤 이제 씃 관심도 없는데 익갤글 가져다가 관종짓하는게.

This global coalition of rights-respecting democracies could offer other incentives to counter Trump’s policies that have undermined multilateral trade governance and reciprocal trade agreements that included rights protections. Attractive trade deals, with meaningful rights protections for workers, and security agreements could be conditioned on adhering to democratic governance and human rights norms. Democracy already comes with benefits. While autocracies have generally fostered conflict, economic stagnation, or kleptocracy, as evidenced in multiple academic studies, including the work of the Nobel Prize-winning economist Daron Acemoglu, democratic institutions reliably yield economic growth. 

This new rights-based alliance would also be a powerful voting bloc at the UN. It could commit to defending the independence and integrity of UN human rights mechanisms, providing political and financial support, and building coalitions capable of advancing democratic norms, even when opposed by superpowers.

Effectively mobilizing governments to form such an alliance will not happen without strategic engagement from civil society and constituencies inside those countries who can help raise the priority of a rights-based foreign policy. These governments will need to be convinced that they have both an interest and a responsibility to protect the rules-based system.

Projects of this nature are bubbling up. Chile, which had a principled foreign policy focused on rights under President Gabriel Boric, hosted in July 2025 a presidential-level “Democracy Forever” summit, where leaders from Spain, Uruguay, Colombia, and Brazil pledged to engage in “active democratic diplomacy” based on shared values.

The Hague Group, led by Malaysia, South Africa, and Colombia, formed in January 2025 in “defense of international law” and in solidarity with Palestinians. Over 70 countries from all regions signed a joint statement defending multilateralism at the UN. Earlier, in 2017, former Danish Prime Minister Anders Fogh Rasmussen set up the Alliance of Democracies Foundation to rally the dwindling ranks of democratic countries to “support each other against authoritarian pressures.”

Whatever its precise contours, an alliance of rights-respecting democracies would offer a hopeful counterpoint to the authoritarian trope of China’s and Russia’s leaders standing alongside North Korea’s Kim Jong Un, observing military hardware in a parade in Beijing’s Tiananmen Square in September. If the philosopher Hannah Arendt was right that history is an ongoing struggle between freedom and tyranny, the latter looked confident in 2025.

Yet, even in the worst of times, the idea of freedom and human rights is enduring. People power remains an engine for change. In the US, “No Kings” marches have drawn millions, protesters in Chicago, Minneapolis, Los Angeles, and around the country have stood up against the deployment of the National Guard and ICE abuses, and students are still organizing for Palestine on university campuses despite draconian crackdowns and visa revocations.

Buoyed by popular resistance, South Korean parliamentarians impeached their president to prevent him from grabbing power through martial law. Grassroots aid efforts by Sudan’s emergency response rooms, Hong Kong’s fire relief, Sri Lanka’s cyclone relief community kitchens, and Ukrainian mutual aid and solidarity collectives represent the best of this trend.

In 2025, Gen Z protests against corruption, inadequate public services, and poor governance in Nepal, Indonesia, and Morocco brought to the forefront the need for governments to listen to their youth and tackle corruption and inequality. But as the difficulties of restoring rights in Bangladesh after years under an authoritarian government illustrates, gains won through public mobilization can easily be lost unless democratic participation and free expression remain unassailable.