Will Human Rights Survive a Trumpian World?

Authoritarian Advances Threaten Rules-Based Order

The global human rights system is in peril. Under relentless pressure from US President Donald Trump, and persistently undermined by China and Russia, the rules-based international order is being crushed, threatening to take with it the architecture human rights defenders have come to rely on to advance norms and protect freedoms. To defy this trend, governments that still value human rights, alongside social movements, civil society, and international institutions, need to form a strategic alliance to push back.

To be fair, the downward spiral predated Trump’s reelection. The democratic wave that began over 50 years ago has given way to what scholars term a “democratic recession.” Democracy is now back to 1985 levels according to some metrics, with 72 percent of the world’s population now living under autocracy. Russia and China are less free today than 20 years ago. And so is the United States.

Of course, democracy is not a panacea for human rights violations; the US and other longtime democracies have their own histories of colonial crimes, racism, abusive justice systems, and wartime atrocities. More recently, authoritarian leaders have exploited public mistrust and anger to win elections and then dismantled the very institutions that brought them to power. Democratic institutions are crucial to represent the will of the people and keep power in check. It’s no surprise that whenever democracy is undermined, rights are too, as evident in recent years in India, Türkiye, the Philippines, El Salvador, and Hungary.

In this context, 2025 may be seen as a tipping point. In just 12 months, the Trump administration has carried out a broad assault on key pillars of US democracy and the global rules-based order, which the US, despite inconsistencies, was, with other states, instrumental in helping to establish.

In short order, Trump’s second-term administration has undermined trust in the sanctity of elections, reduced government accountability, gutted food assistance and healthcare subsidies, attacked judicial independence, defied court orders, rolled back women’s rights, obstructed access to abortion care, undermined remedies for racial harm, terminated programs mandating accessibility for people with disabilities, punished free speech, stripped protections from trans and intersex people, eroded privacy, and used government power to intimidate political opponents, the media, law firms, universities, civil society, and even comedians.

Claiming a risk of “civilizational erasure” in Europe and leaning on racist tropes to cast entire populations as unwelcome in the US, the Trump administration has embraced policies and rhetoric that align with white nationalist ideology. Immigrants and asylum seekers have been subjected to inhumane conditions and degrading treatment; 32 died in US Immigration and Customs Enforcement custody in 2025, and as of mid-January 2026, an additional 4 have died. Masked immigration enforcement agents have targeted people of color, using excessive force, terrorizing communities, wrongfully arresting scores of citizens, and, most recently, unjustifiably killing two people in Minneapolis, whose deaths Human Rights Watch has documented.

The US president of course has the authority to tighten US borders and enforce stricter immigration policies. The administration is not, however, entitled to deny legal process to asylum seekers, mistreat undocumented migrants, or unlawfully discriminate. In a well-functioning democracy, no electoral mandate should supersede domestic legislation, constitutional protections, or international human rights law. Trump’s team has repeatedly bypassed these guardrails.

The violations have not stopped at the border. The Trump administration used a 1798 law to send hundreds of Venezuelan migrants to an infamous prison in El Salvador, where they were tortured and sexually abused. Its blatantly unlawful strikes on boats in the Caribbean and the Pacific extrajudicially killed more than 120 people whom Trump claims were drug traffickers.

After the US attacked Venezuela and apprehended its president, Nicolás Maduro, and his wife, Cilia Flores, Trump claimed the US would “run” the country and control its vast oil reserves. Despite paying lip service to human rights concerns under Maduro at the United Nations, Trump has worked with the same repressive apparatus to further US interests. Many Western allies have chosen to stay silent about these lawless moves, perhaps fearing erratic tariffs and blowback to their alliances.

Trump’s foreign policy has upended the foundations of the rules-based order that seeks to advance democracy and human rights, even if imperfectly.

Trump has boasted that he doesn’t “need international law” as a constraint, only his “own morality.” His administration has politicized the US State Department’s annual human rights report, stepped away from the global prohibition on antipersonnel landmines, voiced support for rewriting international rules on asylum, and skipped the UN’s Universal Periodic Review of the US’ human rights record.

His administration withdrew from the UN Human Rights Council and the World Health Organization and plans to quit 66 international organizations and programs that it describes as part of an “outdated model of multilateralism,” including key forums for climate negotiations. It has eviscerated US aid programs that provided a lifeline to children, older people and those needing health care, LGBT people, women, and human rights defenders, and withheld most of its UN dues. 

Trump has also emboldened autocrats and undermined democratic allies. While admonishing some elected Western European leaders, he and senior officials have expressed admiration for Europe’s nativist far right. He has favored autocrats such as Hungary’s Prime Minister Viktor Orban, Türkiye’s President Recep Tayyip Erdoğan, and El Salvador’s President Nayib Bukele, while continuing decades of US support to Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman and Egypt’s President Abdel Fattah al-Sisi.

His administration has unjustifiably imposed sanctions to punish respected Palestinian human rights organizations, the International Criminal Court’s (ICC) prosecutor and many of its judges, a UN special rapporteur, and for several months, a Brazilian Supreme Court judge and his wife.

The institutional response in the US to Trump’s power grabs has been shockingly muted. Much of Congress, controlled by his own party, has not challenged his supercharged expansion of executive power. The leaders of the US’ most powerful technology companies have made significant donations and sought to placate the president. Some big law firms and prestigious universities have made deals rather than assert their independence, and some media organizations seem afraid to attract the president’s ire.

Has the US switched sides on the human rights playing field? While US engagement with human rights institutions has always been selective, China and Russia have long pursued an illiberal agenda. They stand much to gain from a US government that now expresses open hostility to universal rights. China and Russia remain strategic rivals of the US, but all three countries are now led by leaders who share open disdain for norms and institutions that could constrain their power.

Together, they wield considerable economic, military, and diplomatic power. If they were to consistently act as allies of convenience to erode global rules, they could threaten the entire system. Already, a loose international network of countries such as North Korea, Iran, Venezuela, Myanmar, Cuba, and Belarus work in concert with Russia and China. These leaders share very little ideologically but align in undermining human rights and promoting a regressive international agenda. In word and in practice, the US government is now helping them in this endeavor.

The US’ weakening of multilateral institutions also dealt a serious blow to global efforts to prevent or stop grave international crimes. The “never again” movement, born from the horrors of the Holocaust and reignited by the Rwandan and Bosnian genocides, spurred the UN General Assembly to embrace the Responsibility to Protect (R2P) in 2005. Meant to guide international intervention to prevent and stop atrocities in tandem with efforts to prosecute and punish serious crimes, R2P made a real difference in places like the Central African Republic and Kenya.

Today, R2P is rarely invoked and the ICC is under siege. In addition to Trump’s far-reaching sanctions, in December 2025 a Moscow court sentenced the ICC prosecutor and eight of its judges to prison terms in absentia. Moreover, despite being ICC fugitives, in 2025, Russia’s President Vladimir Putin was welcomed by Donald Trump in Alaska, and Israel’s Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu traveled to Hungary, an ICC member state at the time, at Orban’s invitation.

Twenty years ago, the US government and civil society were instrumental in galvanizing a response to mass atrocities in Darfur. Sudan is burning again, but this time under Trump, with relative impunity. Sudan’s Rapid Support Forces (RSF), which emerged from the militias that led the prior ethnic cleansing campaign, are again committing murder and rape on a mass scale. A growing body of evidence indicates that the UAE, a longtime US ally that recently made multi-billion-dollar deals with Trump, is providing the RSF with military support.

In the Occupied Palestinian Territory, the Israeli armed forces have committed acts of genocide, ethnic cleansing, and crimes against humanity, killing over 70,000 people since the October 2023 Hamas-led attacks on Israel and displacing the vast majority of Gaza’s population. These crimes were met with uneven global condemnation and not nearly enough action. Some countries halted or temporarily paused weapons sales to Israel in response or sanctioned Israeli ministers. Trump, however, continued a long-standing US policy of almost unconditional support to Israel, even as the International Court of Justice is weighing allegations of genocide and has issued binding orders under the Genocide Convention to protect Palestinians’ rights.

Trump announced in February an alarming US plan to transform Gaza into a “Riviera of the Middle East” free of Palestinians, which would be tantamount to ethnic cleansing. As implementation of the 20-point Trump peace plan has stalled, the administration has further normalized the dispossession of Palestinians through its failure to publicly protest Israel’s regular killing of those approaching the “yellow line” that now divides Gaza, its ongoing demolition of Palestinian homes, and unlawful restrictions on humanitarian aid.

In Ukraine, Trump’s peace efforts have consistently downplayed Russia’s responsibility for serious violations. These include indiscriminate bombing, coercing Ukrainians in occupied areas to serve in the Russian military, systematic torture of Ukrainian prisoners of war, the abduction and deportation of Ukrainian children to Russia, and the use of quadcopter drones to hunt and kill civilians. Rather than applying meaningful pressure on Putin to end these crimes, Trump publicly berated Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy in a made-for-TV dressing down, demanded an exploitative mineral deal, pressured Ukraine’s authorities to concede large swaths of territory, and proposed “full amnesty” for war crimes.

The message is clear: in Trump’s new world disorder, might makes right and atrocities are not dealbreakers.

후술할 논란거리들로 인해 게임에 대한 전체적인 인식은 꽤 낮아졌었다. 미쳐 돌아가는 파피 플레이타임 2차 창작_1. 아래는 야나비짤 실물 본 양상형 크리터즈. 0 illustrations were posted under this tag.

Maximum8k

Meriol Chan (smol_meri) Latest

혐파피플레이타임 야 나비짤 그림그링 수뻐아고게장 2025. 그림, 행복한 친구들, 구름 문신에 관한 아이디어를 더 확인해 보세요. 파피 플레이타임 마이너 갤러리 커뮤니티 포털 디시인사이드.

파피플레이타임 챕터2 실험실에서 흑화된 악마 마미롱레그 새로운 비밀 통로 poppy playtime chapter 2 secret evil mommy long legs 아려랑 아려랑 314k views 3 years ago. 파피플레이타임 챕터2 실험실에서 흑화된 악마 마미롱레그 새로운 비밀 통로 poppy playtime chapter 2 secret evil mommy long legs 아려랑 아려랑 314k views 3 years ago. Pixiv is a social media platform where users can upload their works illustrations, manga and novels and receive much support. 플레이타임 사 社의 캐치프레이즈 파피 플레이타임 에 등장하는 가상의 장난감 회사. Pinterest에서 태하 정님의 보드 파피플레이타임을를 팔로우하세요. 잡담 파피 플레이타임 야짤 벌써나오던데 수인보호협회장 1 7 6556 2022.

Com › mgallery › board파피 플레이타임 마이너 갤러리 커뮤니티 포털 디시인사이드, Pinterest에서 태하 정님의 보드 파피플레이타임을를 팔로우하세요. Com › @sutak_x › video나와 수탉 공겜 공포게임 파피플레이타임 파피 파피플레이타임. 실험체 편집 플레이타임 사에서 비밀리에 제작하던 실험체들.

20240313 155609 답글 잠만요 님은 코델리우스도 가능한 사람이잖아요 20240313 155829 답글 그것도 야짤 보고 그랬지 인겜 모델링 보고 그러진 않았어요 20240313 155839 답글 글쓰기 전체 떡밥추측 공략정보 질문요청투표 인게임 짤 소설 운영. 파피플레이타임 야짤 나왔네 만화 갤러리 죽음으로 맛있는데. 혁우 @hyukwoo12 님의 tiktok 틱톡 동영상 이 게임은 고문이다 게임 스팀 공포공포게임 스팀공포게임 스팀게임 스팀 인디게임어드벤처어드벤처게임인디공포게임혁우 싱글플레이어 싱글플레이deepline. 혁우 @hyukwoo12 님의 tiktok 틱톡 동영상 게임 중의 어이없는 순간들을 보여주는 공포 게임 영상, 파피플레이타임 챕터2 실험실에서 흑화된 악마 마미롱레그 새로운 비밀 통로 poppy playtime chapter 2 secret evil mommy long legs 아려랑 아려랑 314k views 3 years ago.

Meme 50 Hitomi La

289 하루만 기다리면 파피 플레이타임 챕터 4가 나와요, Popular illustrations, manga and novels tagged 파피플레이타임+야짤, 후술할 논란거리들로 인해 게임에 대한 전체적인 인식은 꽤 낮아졌었다. 실험체 편집 플레이타임 사에서 비밀리에 제작하던 실험체들, 근육 파피 플레이타임 장난감 인형 미스 딜라이트 센세. 재미있는 순간과 콘텐츠로 가득한 영상들을 즐겨보세요.

Poppy playtime mob entertainment careers news contact creator program watch trailer.. Poppy playtime mob entertainment careers news contact creator program watch trailer.. Pixiv is a social media platform where users can upload their works illustrations, manga and novels and receive much support.. 매니저의 부재로 인해 운영에 지장이 있다고 판단될 경우, 다른 회원이 권한을 위임받아 마이너 갤러리를 운영할 수 있습니다..

Com › etcs › board파피 플레이타임 야짤 벌써나오던데 루리웹. 미쳐 돌아가는 파피 플레이타임 2차 창작_3. Com › 6831283143공포게임 파피플레이타임 근황jpg 유머움짤이슈 에펨코리아, 44 likes, tiktok video from maisy🌀 @lemonsnspiders ‼️‼️‼️‼️‼️.

lpl 아이리스 Discover your favorite games, all for free at freegame. 20240313 155609 답글 잠만요 님은 코델리우스도 가능한 사람이잖아요 20240313 155829 답글 그것도 야짤 보고 그랬지 인겜 모델링 보고 그러진 않았어요 20240313 155839 답글 글쓰기 전체 떡밥추측 공략정보 질문요청투표 인게임 짤 소설 운영. 미쳐 돌아가는 파피 플레이타임 2차 창작. 야짤태그 선택할때마다 에러오류떠서 들어가기어렵던데 그점에서 설정정비 288 하루만 기다리면 파피 플레이타임 챕터 4가 나와요. 파피플레이타임 + 루리드레곤이라는 요상한 조합으로 건전한 짤을그렸따. mib 배우 수아

mib 광고 배우 Com › mgallery › board파피 플레이타임 마이너 갤러리 커뮤니티 포털 디시인사이드. 그림, 캐릭터 일러스트, 플레이에 관한 아이디어를 더 확인해 보세요. 짤 근육 파피 플레이타임 장난감 인형 미스 딜라이트 센세. 미쳐 돌아가는 파피 플레이타임 2차 창작. Original sound wll shaahid. lilitales -リリテイルズ- act.1 虜囚の銀騎士

mib 주희 야동 Com › mgallery › board약. 34 pictures on pixiv. 파피 플레이타임은 몹 엔터테인먼트에서 개발출시한 서바이벌 호러, 로지컬 퍼즐 장르의 pc모바일 비디오 게임입니다. See more fan art related to pink panties, cookie run, path to nowhere and cookie run on pixiv. 혐파피플레이타임 야 나비짤 그림그링 수인 마이너 갤러리. meriol_chan solo

mib 이슬 캣냅のイラストやマンガは17件、캣냅の小説、ssは0件投稿されています。캣냅と一緒に付けられている主なタグにはanthro、양아지、poppyplaytime、hippyhopscofch、 read more. 잡담 파피 플레이타임 야짤 벌써나오던데 수인보호협회장 1 7 6556 2022. Com › mgallery › board파피 플레이타임 마이너 갤러리 커뮤니티 포털 디시인사이드. 10 222652 프로필펼치기 음 솔직히 나올법하게 생기긴했지. See more fan art related to joshimatsusann, dororo, tamama, icecream and choroichi on pixiv.

lpl 아이리스 결혼 파피 플레이타임 갤러리에 다양한 이야기를. 아래는 야나비짤 실물 본 양상형 크리터즈. 근육 파피 플레이타임 장난감 인형 미스 딜라이트 센세. Discover your favorite games, all for free at freegame. 미쳐 돌아가는 파피 플레이타임 2차 창작.

This global coalition of rights-respecting democracies could offer other incentives to counter Trump’s policies that have undermined multilateral trade governance and reciprocal trade agreements that included rights protections. Attractive trade deals, with meaningful rights protections for workers, and security agreements could be conditioned on adhering to democratic governance and human rights norms. Democracy already comes with benefits. While autocracies have generally fostered conflict, economic stagnation, or kleptocracy, as evidenced in multiple academic studies, including the work of the Nobel Prize-winning economist Daron Acemoglu, democratic institutions reliably yield economic growth. 

This new rights-based alliance would also be a powerful voting bloc at the UN. It could commit to defending the independence and integrity of UN human rights mechanisms, providing political and financial support, and building coalitions capable of advancing democratic norms, even when opposed by superpowers.

Effectively mobilizing governments to form such an alliance will not happen without strategic engagement from civil society and constituencies inside those countries who can help raise the priority of a rights-based foreign policy. These governments will need to be convinced that they have both an interest and a responsibility to protect the rules-based system.

Projects of this nature are bubbling up. Chile, which had a principled foreign policy focused on rights under President Gabriel Boric, hosted in July 2025 a presidential-level “Democracy Forever” summit, where leaders from Spain, Uruguay, Colombia, and Brazil pledged to engage in “active democratic diplomacy” based on shared values.

The Hague Group, led by Malaysia, South Africa, and Colombia, formed in January 2025 in “defense of international law” and in solidarity with Palestinians. Over 70 countries from all regions signed a joint statement defending multilateralism at the UN. Earlier, in 2017, former Danish Prime Minister Anders Fogh Rasmussen set up the Alliance of Democracies Foundation to rally the dwindling ranks of democratic countries to “support each other against authoritarian pressures.”

Whatever its precise contours, an alliance of rights-respecting democracies would offer a hopeful counterpoint to the authoritarian trope of China’s and Russia’s leaders standing alongside North Korea’s Kim Jong Un, observing military hardware in a parade in Beijing’s Tiananmen Square in September. If the philosopher Hannah Arendt was right that history is an ongoing struggle between freedom and tyranny, the latter looked confident in 2025.

Yet, even in the worst of times, the idea of freedom and human rights is enduring. People power remains an engine for change. In the US, “No Kings” marches have drawn millions, protesters in Chicago, Minneapolis, Los Angeles, and around the country have stood up against the deployment of the National Guard and ICE abuses, and students are still organizing for Palestine on university campuses despite draconian crackdowns and visa revocations.

Buoyed by popular resistance, South Korean parliamentarians impeached their president to prevent him from grabbing power through martial law. Grassroots aid efforts by Sudan’s emergency response rooms, Hong Kong’s fire relief, Sri Lanka’s cyclone relief community kitchens, and Ukrainian mutual aid and solidarity collectives represent the best of this trend.

In 2025, Gen Z protests against corruption, inadequate public services, and poor governance in Nepal, Indonesia, and Morocco brought to the forefront the need for governments to listen to their youth and tackle corruption and inequality. But as the difficulties of restoring rights in Bangladesh after years under an authoritarian government illustrates, gains won through public mobilization can easily be lost unless democratic participation and free expression remain unassailable.