Will Human Rights Survive a Trumpian World?

Authoritarian Advances Threaten Rules-Based Order

The global human rights system is in peril. Under relentless pressure from US President Donald Trump, and persistently undermined by China and Russia, the rules-based international order is being crushed, threatening to take with it the architecture human rights defenders have come to rely on to advance norms and protect freedoms. To defy this trend, governments that still value human rights, alongside social movements, civil society, and international institutions, need to form a strategic alliance to push back.

To be fair, the downward spiral predated Trump’s reelection. The democratic wave that began over 50 years ago has given way to what scholars term a “democratic recession.” Democracy is now back to 1985 levels according to some metrics, with 72 percent of the world’s population now living under autocracy. Russia and China are less free today than 20 years ago. And so is the United States.

Of course, democracy is not a panacea for human rights violations; the US and other longtime democracies have their own histories of colonial crimes, racism, abusive justice systems, and wartime atrocities. More recently, authoritarian leaders have exploited public mistrust and anger to win elections and then dismantled the very institutions that brought them to power. Democratic institutions are crucial to represent the will of the people and keep power in check. It’s no surprise that whenever democracy is undermined, rights are too, as evident in recent years in India, Türkiye, the Philippines, El Salvador, and Hungary.

In this context, 2025 may be seen as a tipping point. In just 12 months, the Trump administration has carried out a broad assault on key pillars of US democracy and the global rules-based order, which the US, despite inconsistencies, was, with other states, instrumental in helping to establish.

In short order, Trump’s second-term administration has undermined trust in the sanctity of elections, reduced government accountability, gutted food assistance and healthcare subsidies, attacked judicial independence, defied court orders, rolled back women’s rights, obstructed access to abortion care, undermined remedies for racial harm, terminated programs mandating accessibility for people with disabilities, punished free speech, stripped protections from trans and intersex people, eroded privacy, and used government power to intimidate political opponents, the media, law firms, universities, civil society, and even comedians.

Claiming a risk of “civilizational erasure” in Europe and leaning on racist tropes to cast entire populations as unwelcome in the US, the Trump administration has embraced policies and rhetoric that align with white nationalist ideology. Immigrants and asylum seekers have been subjected to inhumane conditions and degrading treatment; 32 died in US Immigration and Customs Enforcement custody in 2025, and as of mid-January 2026, an additional 4 have died. Masked immigration enforcement agents have targeted people of color, using excessive force, terrorizing communities, wrongfully arresting scores of citizens, and, most recently, unjustifiably killing two people in Minneapolis, whose deaths Human Rights Watch has documented.

The US president of course has the authority to tighten US borders and enforce stricter immigration policies. The administration is not, however, entitled to deny legal process to asylum seekers, mistreat undocumented migrants, or unlawfully discriminate. In a well-functioning democracy, no electoral mandate should supersede domestic legislation, constitutional protections, or international human rights law. Trump’s team has repeatedly bypassed these guardrails.

The violations have not stopped at the border. The Trump administration used a 1798 law to send hundreds of Venezuelan migrants to an infamous prison in El Salvador, where they were tortured and sexually abused. Its blatantly unlawful strikes on boats in the Caribbean and the Pacific extrajudicially killed more than 120 people whom Trump claims were drug traffickers.

After the US attacked Venezuela and apprehended its president, Nicolás Maduro, and his wife, Cilia Flores, Trump claimed the US would “run” the country and control its vast oil reserves. Despite paying lip service to human rights concerns under Maduro at the United Nations, Trump has worked with the same repressive apparatus to further US interests. Many Western allies have chosen to stay silent about these lawless moves, perhaps fearing erratic tariffs and blowback to their alliances.

Trump’s foreign policy has upended the foundations of the rules-based order that seeks to advance democracy and human rights, even if imperfectly.

Trump has boasted that he doesn’t “need international law” as a constraint, only his “own morality.” His administration has politicized the US State Department’s annual human rights report, stepped away from the global prohibition on antipersonnel landmines, voiced support for rewriting international rules on asylum, and skipped the UN’s Universal Periodic Review of the US’ human rights record.

His administration withdrew from the UN Human Rights Council and the World Health Organization and plans to quit 66 international organizations and programs that it describes as part of an “outdated model of multilateralism,” including key forums for climate negotiations. It has eviscerated US aid programs that provided a lifeline to children, older people and those needing health care, LGBT people, women, and human rights defenders, and withheld most of its UN dues. 

Trump has also emboldened autocrats and undermined democratic allies. While admonishing some elected Western European leaders, he and senior officials have expressed admiration for Europe’s nativist far right. He has favored autocrats such as Hungary’s Prime Minister Viktor Orban, Türkiye’s President Recep Tayyip Erdoğan, and El Salvador’s President Nayib Bukele, while continuing decades of US support to Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman and Egypt’s President Abdel Fattah al-Sisi.

His administration has unjustifiably imposed sanctions to punish respected Palestinian human rights organizations, the International Criminal Court’s (ICC) prosecutor and many of its judges, a UN special rapporteur, and for several months, a Brazilian Supreme Court judge and his wife.

The institutional response in the US to Trump’s power grabs has been shockingly muted. Much of Congress, controlled by his own party, has not challenged his supercharged expansion of executive power. The leaders of the US’ most powerful technology companies have made significant donations and sought to placate the president. Some big law firms and prestigious universities have made deals rather than assert their independence, and some media organizations seem afraid to attract the president’s ire.

Has the US switched sides on the human rights playing field? While US engagement with human rights institutions has always been selective, China and Russia have long pursued an illiberal agenda. They stand much to gain from a US government that now expresses open hostility to universal rights. China and Russia remain strategic rivals of the US, but all three countries are now led by leaders who share open disdain for norms and institutions that could constrain their power.

Together, they wield considerable economic, military, and diplomatic power. If they were to consistently act as allies of convenience to erode global rules, they could threaten the entire system. Already, a loose international network of countries such as North Korea, Iran, Venezuela, Myanmar, Cuba, and Belarus work in concert with Russia and China. These leaders share very little ideologically but align in undermining human rights and promoting a regressive international agenda. In word and in practice, the US government is now helping them in this endeavor.

The US’ weakening of multilateral institutions also dealt a serious blow to global efforts to prevent or stop grave international crimes. The “never again” movement, born from the horrors of the Holocaust and reignited by the Rwandan and Bosnian genocides, spurred the UN General Assembly to embrace the Responsibility to Protect (R2P) in 2005. Meant to guide international intervention to prevent and stop atrocities in tandem with efforts to prosecute and punish serious crimes, R2P made a real difference in places like the Central African Republic and Kenya.

Today, R2P is rarely invoked and the ICC is under siege. In addition to Trump’s far-reaching sanctions, in December 2025 a Moscow court sentenced the ICC prosecutor and eight of its judges to prison terms in absentia. Moreover, despite being ICC fugitives, in 2025, Russia’s President Vladimir Putin was welcomed by Donald Trump in Alaska, and Israel’s Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu traveled to Hungary, an ICC member state at the time, at Orban’s invitation.

Twenty years ago, the US government and civil society were instrumental in galvanizing a response to mass atrocities in Darfur. Sudan is burning again, but this time under Trump, with relative impunity. Sudan’s Rapid Support Forces (RSF), which emerged from the militias that led the prior ethnic cleansing campaign, are again committing murder and rape on a mass scale. A growing body of evidence indicates that the UAE, a longtime US ally that recently made multi-billion-dollar deals with Trump, is providing the RSF with military support.

In the Occupied Palestinian Territory, the Israeli armed forces have committed acts of genocide, ethnic cleansing, and crimes against humanity, killing over 70,000 people since the October 2023 Hamas-led attacks on Israel and displacing the vast majority of Gaza’s population. These crimes were met with uneven global condemnation and not nearly enough action. Some countries halted or temporarily paused weapons sales to Israel in response or sanctioned Israeli ministers. Trump, however, continued a long-standing US policy of almost unconditional support to Israel, even as the International Court of Justice is weighing allegations of genocide and has issued binding orders under the Genocide Convention to protect Palestinians’ rights.

Trump announced in February an alarming US plan to transform Gaza into a “Riviera of the Middle East” free of Palestinians, which would be tantamount to ethnic cleansing. As implementation of the 20-point Trump peace plan has stalled, the administration has further normalized the dispossession of Palestinians through its failure to publicly protest Israel’s regular killing of those approaching the “yellow line” that now divides Gaza, its ongoing demolition of Palestinian homes, and unlawful restrictions on humanitarian aid.

In Ukraine, Trump’s peace efforts have consistently downplayed Russia’s responsibility for serious violations. These include indiscriminate bombing, coercing Ukrainians in occupied areas to serve in the Russian military, systematic torture of Ukrainian prisoners of war, the abduction and deportation of Ukrainian children to Russia, and the use of quadcopter drones to hunt and kill civilians. Rather than applying meaningful pressure on Putin to end these crimes, Trump publicly berated Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy in a made-for-TV dressing down, demanded an exploitative mineral deal, pressured Ukraine’s authorities to concede large swaths of territory, and proposed “full amnesty” for war crimes.

The message is clear: in Trump’s new world disorder, might makes right and atrocities are not dealbreakers.

워낙 숏컷이나 단발 고객이 많다보니 이번엔 긴머리 고객 사진찍고 싶었다ㅋ. 머리 색이 약간 갈색으로 보이지만 이분은. 잠실역 미용실 알렉산드르드파리, 중단발 글램펌 대만족 네이버 블로그 beauty 156개의 글 목록열기. 펌제를 통해서 웨이브가 생겨나고 중화제를 통해서 형성된 컬이 고정이 되는 원리입니다.

윤가 놈 논란

Com › reel › brzzbzagqv1instagram.. 이번에 다녀온 강남 미용실 파베드헤어 후기.. 글램펌첫번째 글램펌은 레이어드컷으로 무거워 보이는 머리를 가볍게 해주면서s컬을 굵게 넣어주어서 고데기 한듯이 자연스러운..

윤가놈 실물

청담스타일글램펌 추천인기 상품, ssg, 저도 긴머리 굵은 웨이브펌을 위해 열심히 기르는 중. 글램펌 관리 팁 글램펌을 유지하기 위해서는 적절한 관리가 필요합니다. 단발머리헤어스타일 글램펌으로 자연스런 볼륨있는 풍성한 웨이브만들어보기. 바디펌, 발롱펌, 글램펌, 허그펌 다양한 파마,펌 종류를 알아.

윤공주 이소은사건

제가 예약한 시간이 오후4시라서 한적하겠거니 했는데 손님분들도 많고 직원분분들도 많이 계셔서 규모가 제법 유명한 범계미용실 이구나 싶었어요 로비 식탁에 앉아서 대기하고 있으면 디자이너분이 락커에 개인 물품 보관을 도와주시고요 열쇠키가 아닌 번호키 도어락이어서 손에 뭐 안가지고.. 단발머리헤어스타일 글램펌으로 자연스런 볼륨있는 풍성한 웨이브만들어보기.. 두번째로는 머리 길이, 얼굴형, 머리카락의 상태에 맞는 디자인을 결정합니다..

윤공주 오프 후기

글램펌 브랜드 중고거래 플랫폼, 번개장터, 글램펌 브랜드 중고거래 플랫폼, 번개장터, 글램펌 브랜드 중고거래 플랫폼, 번개장터.

이기북딱갤

단발머리헤어스타일 글램펌으로 자연스런 볼륨있는 풍성한 웨이브만들어보기, Com › glamhair › 222997008616긴 머리 풍성한 웨이브를 원할 땐 글램펌 네이버 블로그. Com › sai090 › 222131027329여자 긴머리에 손질하기 쉬운 웨이브 글램펌 했어요, 두번째로는 머리 길이, 얼굴형, 머리카락의 상태에 맞는 디자인을 결정합니다.

이리 티어표 2025 바디펌, 발롱펌, 글램펌, 허그펌 다양한 파마,펌 종류를 알아. 글램펌 시술 방법은 대략 다음과 같은 과정을 거칩니다. 긴머리이신 분들은 일명 여신머리를 많이들 하시는데요. 박준뷰티랩 강남역점 박준뷰티랩 강남역점 입니다. 에어랩유선자동전원차단온도조절코드꼬임방지노즐 블로우브러쉬볼륨브러쉬열브러쉬규격소비전력 95w무게 328g. 윤가놈 다시보기

이가라시 쿄헤이 트위터 글램펌 손질 방법 글램펌은 전체적으로 컬이 들어가기 때문에 s 컬 웨이브나 c컬보다 컬이 많아서 손질하는 게 어렵게 느껴 지시는 분들도 있는데요 대부분 열펌의 손질 방법은 비슷합니다. 긴머리 글램펌은 여성들이 선호하는 긴 머리에 은 웨이브스타일로 긴 머리펌 중에서도 얼굴이 작아 보이면서 세련된 이미지를 보인다는 것. Com › 머리숱많아보이는펌머리숱 많아보이는 펌 어떤 종류가 있을까. Likes, 0 comments lloydbomb_soonmi on janu 글램펌. 글램펌 손질 방법 글램펌은 전체적으로 컬이 들어가기 때문에 s 컬 웨이브나 c컬보다 컬이 많아서 손질하는 게 어렵게 느껴 지시는 분들도 있는데요 대부분 열펌의 손질 방법은 비슷합니다. 유화 19

윤진 야동 또한 저희 살롱은 편안한 스파시설이 완비 되어 있으며, 특화된 복구 전문살롱 건강한 아름다움을 제시 합니다. 미디움디자인에서 가장 손질쉽고 예쁜 디자인이에요. Sohohair @sohohair_salon 님의 tiktok 틱톡 동영상 여자헤어스타일 긴머리스타일 중단발 인생머리 글램펌 데일리헤어 긴머리파마 중단발스타일 대전둔산동 여자펌추천 대전머리잘하는곳 대전은행동 대전헤어샵 용전동미용실 소호헤어 소호헤어7호점. 319 likes, 1 comments han. Com › watch러블리한 미디움펌, 글램펌 추천합니다. 유튜브 오디오 추출

유키 디시 그렇다면 자연스러운 웨이브의 명칭은 무엇일까. 에어랩유선자동전원차단온도조절 read more. 긴머리 글램펌은 여성들이 선호하는 긴 머리에 은 웨이브스타일로 긴 머리펌 중에서도 얼굴이 작아 보이면서 세련된 이미지를 보인다는 것. Com › watch러블리한 미디움펌, 글램펌 추천합니다. 글램펌첫번째 글램펌은 레이어드컷으로 무거워 보이는 머리를 가볍게 해주면서s컬을 굵게 넣어주어서 고데기 한듯이 자연스러운.

이 pk3.harpi.in 잠실역 미용실 알렉산드르드파리, 중단발 글램펌 대만족 네이버 블로그 beauty 156개의 글 목록열기. 미디움디자인에서 가장 손질쉽고 예쁜 디자인이에요. Com › reel › duitzw7ewrv대구미용실 로이드밤 신월성 순미 on instagram 글램펌. 안녕하세요, 넘버원헤어아카데미입니다 오늘은 날씨가 선선하니 좋은 것 같더니 지금은 조금씩 비가내리. 적당한 레이어드에 풍성함이 가미된 굵은웨이브.

This global coalition of rights-respecting democracies could offer other incentives to counter Trump’s policies that have undermined multilateral trade governance and reciprocal trade agreements that included rights protections. Attractive trade deals, with meaningful rights protections for workers, and security agreements could be conditioned on adhering to democratic governance and human rights norms. Democracy already comes with benefits. While autocracies have generally fostered conflict, economic stagnation, or kleptocracy, as evidenced in multiple academic studies, including the work of the Nobel Prize-winning economist Daron Acemoglu, democratic institutions reliably yield economic growth. 

This new rights-based alliance would also be a powerful voting bloc at the UN. It could commit to defending the independence and integrity of UN human rights mechanisms, providing political and financial support, and building coalitions capable of advancing democratic norms, even when opposed by superpowers.

Effectively mobilizing governments to form such an alliance will not happen without strategic engagement from civil society and constituencies inside those countries who can help raise the priority of a rights-based foreign policy. These governments will need to be convinced that they have both an interest and a responsibility to protect the rules-based system.

Projects of this nature are bubbling up. Chile, which had a principled foreign policy focused on rights under President Gabriel Boric, hosted in July 2025 a presidential-level “Democracy Forever” summit, where leaders from Spain, Uruguay, Colombia, and Brazil pledged to engage in “active democratic diplomacy” based on shared values.

The Hague Group, led by Malaysia, South Africa, and Colombia, formed in January 2025 in “defense of international law” and in solidarity with Palestinians. Over 70 countries from all regions signed a joint statement defending multilateralism at the UN. Earlier, in 2017, former Danish Prime Minister Anders Fogh Rasmussen set up the Alliance of Democracies Foundation to rally the dwindling ranks of democratic countries to “support each other against authoritarian pressures.”

Whatever its precise contours, an alliance of rights-respecting democracies would offer a hopeful counterpoint to the authoritarian trope of China’s and Russia’s leaders standing alongside North Korea’s Kim Jong Un, observing military hardware in a parade in Beijing’s Tiananmen Square in September. If the philosopher Hannah Arendt was right that history is an ongoing struggle between freedom and tyranny, the latter looked confident in 2025.

Yet, even in the worst of times, the idea of freedom and human rights is enduring. People power remains an engine for change. In the US, “No Kings” marches have drawn millions, protesters in Chicago, Minneapolis, Los Angeles, and around the country have stood up against the deployment of the National Guard and ICE abuses, and students are still organizing for Palestine on university campuses despite draconian crackdowns and visa revocations.

Buoyed by popular resistance, South Korean parliamentarians impeached their president to prevent him from grabbing power through martial law. Grassroots aid efforts by Sudan’s emergency response rooms, Hong Kong’s fire relief, Sri Lanka’s cyclone relief community kitchens, and Ukrainian mutual aid and solidarity collectives represent the best of this trend.

In 2025, Gen Z protests against corruption, inadequate public services, and poor governance in Nepal, Indonesia, and Morocco brought to the forefront the need for governments to listen to their youth and tackle corruption and inequality. But as the difficulties of restoring rights in Bangladesh after years under an authoritarian government illustrates, gains won through public mobilization can easily be lost unless democratic participation and free expression remain unassailable.