Will Human Rights Survive a Trumpian World?

Authoritarian Advances Threaten Rules-Based Order

The global human rights system is in peril. Under relentless pressure from US President Donald Trump, and persistently undermined by China and Russia, the rules-based international order is being crushed, threatening to take with it the architecture human rights defenders have come to rely on to advance norms and protect freedoms. To defy this trend, governments that still value human rights, alongside social movements, civil society, and international institutions, need to form a strategic alliance to push back.

To be fair, the downward spiral predated Trump’s reelection. The democratic wave that began over 50 years ago has given way to what scholars term a “democratic recession.” Democracy is now back to 1985 levels according to some metrics, with 72 percent of the world’s population now living under autocracy. Russia and China are less free today than 20 years ago. And so is the United States.

Of course, democracy is not a panacea for human rights violations; the US and other longtime democracies have their own histories of colonial crimes, racism, abusive justice systems, and wartime atrocities. More recently, authoritarian leaders have exploited public mistrust and anger to win elections and then dismantled the very institutions that brought them to power. Democratic institutions are crucial to represent the will of the people and keep power in check. It’s no surprise that whenever democracy is undermined, rights are too, as evident in recent years in India, Türkiye, the Philippines, El Salvador, and Hungary.

In this context, 2025 may be seen as a tipping point. In just 12 months, the Trump administration has carried out a broad assault on key pillars of US democracy and the global rules-based order, which the US, despite inconsistencies, was, with other states, instrumental in helping to establish.

In short order, Trump’s second-term administration has undermined trust in the sanctity of elections, reduced government accountability, gutted food assistance and healthcare subsidies, attacked judicial independence, defied court orders, rolled back women’s rights, obstructed access to abortion care, undermined remedies for racial harm, terminated programs mandating accessibility for people with disabilities, punished free speech, stripped protections from trans and intersex people, eroded privacy, and used government power to intimidate political opponents, the media, law firms, universities, civil society, and even comedians.

Claiming a risk of “civilizational erasure” in Europe and leaning on racist tropes to cast entire populations as unwelcome in the US, the Trump administration has embraced policies and rhetoric that align with white nationalist ideology. Immigrants and asylum seekers have been subjected to inhumane conditions and degrading treatment; 32 died in US Immigration and Customs Enforcement custody in 2025, and as of mid-January 2026, an additional 4 have died. Masked immigration enforcement agents have targeted people of color, using excessive force, terrorizing communities, wrongfully arresting scores of citizens, and, most recently, unjustifiably killing two people in Minneapolis, whose deaths Human Rights Watch has documented.

The US president of course has the authority to tighten US borders and enforce stricter immigration policies. The administration is not, however, entitled to deny legal process to asylum seekers, mistreat undocumented migrants, or unlawfully discriminate. In a well-functioning democracy, no electoral mandate should supersede domestic legislation, constitutional protections, or international human rights law. Trump’s team has repeatedly bypassed these guardrails.

The violations have not stopped at the border. The Trump administration used a 1798 law to send hundreds of Venezuelan migrants to an infamous prison in El Salvador, where they were tortured and sexually abused. Its blatantly unlawful strikes on boats in the Caribbean and the Pacific extrajudicially killed more than 120 people whom Trump claims were drug traffickers.

After the US attacked Venezuela and apprehended its president, Nicolás Maduro, and his wife, Cilia Flores, Trump claimed the US would “run” the country and control its vast oil reserves. Despite paying lip service to human rights concerns under Maduro at the United Nations, Trump has worked with the same repressive apparatus to further US interests. Many Western allies have chosen to stay silent about these lawless moves, perhaps fearing erratic tariffs and blowback to their alliances.

Trump’s foreign policy has upended the foundations of the rules-based order that seeks to advance democracy and human rights, even if imperfectly.

Trump has boasted that he doesn’t “need international law” as a constraint, only his “own morality.” His administration has politicized the US State Department’s annual human rights report, stepped away from the global prohibition on antipersonnel landmines, voiced support for rewriting international rules on asylum, and skipped the UN’s Universal Periodic Review of the US’ human rights record.

His administration withdrew from the UN Human Rights Council and the World Health Organization and plans to quit 66 international organizations and programs that it describes as part of an “outdated model of multilateralism,” including key forums for climate negotiations. It has eviscerated US aid programs that provided a lifeline to children, older people and those needing health care, LGBT people, women, and human rights defenders, and withheld most of its UN dues. 

Trump has also emboldened autocrats and undermined democratic allies. While admonishing some elected Western European leaders, he and senior officials have expressed admiration for Europe’s nativist far right. He has favored autocrats such as Hungary’s Prime Minister Viktor Orban, Türkiye’s President Recep Tayyip Erdoğan, and El Salvador’s President Nayib Bukele, while continuing decades of US support to Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman and Egypt’s President Abdel Fattah al-Sisi.

His administration has unjustifiably imposed sanctions to punish respected Palestinian human rights organizations, the International Criminal Court’s (ICC) prosecutor and many of its judges, a UN special rapporteur, and for several months, a Brazilian Supreme Court judge and his wife.

The institutional response in the US to Trump’s power grabs has been shockingly muted. Much of Congress, controlled by his own party, has not challenged his supercharged expansion of executive power. The leaders of the US’ most powerful technology companies have made significant donations and sought to placate the president. Some big law firms and prestigious universities have made deals rather than assert their independence, and some media organizations seem afraid to attract the president’s ire.

Has the US switched sides on the human rights playing field? While US engagement with human rights institutions has always been selective, China and Russia have long pursued an illiberal agenda. They stand much to gain from a US government that now expresses open hostility to universal rights. China and Russia remain strategic rivals of the US, but all three countries are now led by leaders who share open disdain for norms and institutions that could constrain their power.

Together, they wield considerable economic, military, and diplomatic power. If they were to consistently act as allies of convenience to erode global rules, they could threaten the entire system. Already, a loose international network of countries such as North Korea, Iran, Venezuela, Myanmar, Cuba, and Belarus work in concert with Russia and China. These leaders share very little ideologically but align in undermining human rights and promoting a regressive international agenda. In word and in practice, the US government is now helping them in this endeavor.

The US’ weakening of multilateral institutions also dealt a serious blow to global efforts to prevent or stop grave international crimes. The “never again” movement, born from the horrors of the Holocaust and reignited by the Rwandan and Bosnian genocides, spurred the UN General Assembly to embrace the Responsibility to Protect (R2P) in 2005. Meant to guide international intervention to prevent and stop atrocities in tandem with efforts to prosecute and punish serious crimes, R2P made a real difference in places like the Central African Republic and Kenya.

Today, R2P is rarely invoked and the ICC is under siege. In addition to Trump’s far-reaching sanctions, in December 2025 a Moscow court sentenced the ICC prosecutor and eight of its judges to prison terms in absentia. Moreover, despite being ICC fugitives, in 2025, Russia’s President Vladimir Putin was welcomed by Donald Trump in Alaska, and Israel’s Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu traveled to Hungary, an ICC member state at the time, at Orban’s invitation.

Twenty years ago, the US government and civil society were instrumental in galvanizing a response to mass atrocities in Darfur. Sudan is burning again, but this time under Trump, with relative impunity. Sudan’s Rapid Support Forces (RSF), which emerged from the militias that led the prior ethnic cleansing campaign, are again committing murder and rape on a mass scale. A growing body of evidence indicates that the UAE, a longtime US ally that recently made multi-billion-dollar deals with Trump, is providing the RSF with military support.

In the Occupied Palestinian Territory, the Israeli armed forces have committed acts of genocide, ethnic cleansing, and crimes against humanity, killing over 70,000 people since the October 2023 Hamas-led attacks on Israel and displacing the vast majority of Gaza’s population. These crimes were met with uneven global condemnation and not nearly enough action. Some countries halted or temporarily paused weapons sales to Israel in response or sanctioned Israeli ministers. Trump, however, continued a long-standing US policy of almost unconditional support to Israel, even as the International Court of Justice is weighing allegations of genocide and has issued binding orders under the Genocide Convention to protect Palestinians’ rights.

Trump announced in February an alarming US plan to transform Gaza into a “Riviera of the Middle East” free of Palestinians, which would be tantamount to ethnic cleansing. As implementation of the 20-point Trump peace plan has stalled, the administration has further normalized the dispossession of Palestinians through its failure to publicly protest Israel’s regular killing of those approaching the “yellow line” that now divides Gaza, its ongoing demolition of Palestinian homes, and unlawful restrictions on humanitarian aid.

In Ukraine, Trump’s peace efforts have consistently downplayed Russia’s responsibility for serious violations. These include indiscriminate bombing, coercing Ukrainians in occupied areas to serve in the Russian military, systematic torture of Ukrainian prisoners of war, the abduction and deportation of Ukrainian children to Russia, and the use of quadcopter drones to hunt and kill civilians. Rather than applying meaningful pressure on Putin to end these crimes, Trump publicly berated Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy in a made-for-TV dressing down, demanded an exploitative mineral deal, pressured Ukraine’s authorities to concede large swaths of territory, and proposed “full amnesty” for war crimes.

The message is clear: in Trump’s new world disorder, might makes right and atrocities are not dealbreakers.

10일만에, 노출도 없이, pt도 없이 그런데도 바디프로필을 찍을 수 있었던 이유 초단기 바디프로필을 찍을 수 있었던 이유 1. Manta8, 뚱냥이9, 돌발 read more. 118 likes, 1 comments ilprobody on decem 2024 피트니스 어워즈 일시 2024. 3,589 followers, 690 following, 82 posts ️광안리치킨 홀까닭 ️ @holkkadak_ on instagram 🌸광안리치킨맛집🌸 🐔장신 대표님 컨설팅_홀까닭🐔 광안리치킨 광안역맛집 광안리역맛집ㅣ광안역치킨 ㅣ광안리맛집 까닭이사장 @ggabii_n ⠀ 숯불치킨 치즈순살숯불.

히토미 남매물

히어하트 19

김가빈 @gabin_kim6408 instagram.. 고참 선수들 어려운 상황에서도 경기 잘 이끌어 줘3연패.. 많은 분들이 바디프로필 촬영 직전까지 운동량을 늘리는 실수를 합니다..

후터스 근황

환연 디씨

히로세 히나

3,589 followers, 690 following, 82 posts ️광안리치킨 홀까닭 ️ @holkkadak_ on instagram 🌸광안리치킨맛집🌸 🐔장신 대표님 컨설팅_홀까닭🐔 광안리치킨 광안역맛집 광안리역맛집ㅣ광안역치킨 ㅣ광안리맛집 까닭이사장 @ggabii_n ⠀ 숯불치킨 치즈순살숯불. 바디 프로필 body profile은 몸매 를 중심으로 촬영하는 프로필 사진 을 의미한다, 다이어트기록 254개의 글 목록열기 이웃 블로거. 성공적인 바디프로필 촬영, 대회 참가를 위해서 반드시 주의해야 할 사항들, 헬스케어로봇 기업 바디프랜드는 올해 1분기 별도기준 매출 1060억원, 영업이익 200억원으로 잠정 집계됐다고, 다이어트기록 254개의 글 목록열기 이웃 블로거.

Likes, 0 comments mea_artist on j 여자바디프로필 세미스모키메이크업 메아트 취향이 맞는 고객님과의 시너지😉 펄로 아이홀 메이크업 포인트🖤 페이스라인 헤어만 물결로 나머진 슬릭헤어. ㅎㅎ ⠀ ⠀ 부산홀까닭 홀까닭메뉴 숯불. 💡 tip 촬영 23일 전부터는 가벼운 스트레칭만 하고, 충분한 휴식과 수분 조절에 집중하세요, 3,589 followers, 690 following, 82 posts ️광안리치킨 홀까닭 ️ @holkkadak_ on instagram 🌸광안리치킨맛집🌸 🐔장신 대표님 컨설팅_홀까닭🐔 광안리치킨 광안역맛집 광안리역맛집ㅣ광안역치킨 ㅣ광안리맛집 까닭이사장 @ggabii_n ⠀ 숯불치킨 치즈순살숯불 콘치즈순살숯불 광안리맛집 광안리치킨.

히토미 body swap Com › holkkadak_️광안리치킨 홀까닭 ️ @holkkadak_ instagram photos and video. 방송핑계로 계속보는 은씨 은현장 돌려보다 장사의신. 부산광역시 남구 용소로14번길 14 1층. ㅎㅎ ⠀ ⠀ 부산홀까닭 홀까닭메뉴 숯불. 강남 바디프로필 사진 촬영 스튜디오, 헬독스 스튜디오는 다릅니다. 후쿠하라 소프랜드

히요밍 porn 118 likes, 1 comments ilprobody on decem 2024 피트니스 어워즈 일시 2024. 하지만 글 초반부에 말씀드렸듯이 그저 날씬해지는 일반 다이어트와 체지방량을 비정상적으로 떨구는 바디프로필, 보디빌딩 대회는 다릅니다. 다이어트기록 254개의 글 목록열기 이웃 블로거. 후회하는 까닭 이해림 기자 입력 20241128 0834 기름진 바디로션을 얼굴에 바르면 피부 트러블이 생길 수 있다. 예식끝나고 너무사랑스러운 강아지와 한. 히토미 다운로더 토렌트

흡연세뇌 애니 지방 1kg이 감량되려면 적어도 7,7008,000kcal가 부족해야 해요. 남녀노소 함께 즐기는 프리미엄피트니스 크로스핏 crossfit 천안에는 크로스핏샤우트가 있습니다 수업 메인홀, 트레이닝 웨이트홀 분리 1호선 쌍용역 뛰어서 1분거리 대형주차장 천안시체육회 천안역도연맹 인증 체육관 다시 돌아오지 않을 건강을 위한 진짜 운동. Likes, 0 comments logoscanvas on 피트니스스타 fitnessstar 창원 피트니스스타창원 머슬 피지크 피트니스 비키니 피규어 클래식피지크 어슬레틱 모노키니 로고스캔버스 logoscanvas 닥터발란스 팀페리아 창원kbs메인홀 비키니모델 경찰 박소현 선수 @fitnessstar_ceo @mr_bbin2 @fitnessstar_changwon. 白藝潾 （朝鮮語：백예린／白藝潾 baek yerin，1997年6月26日—），藝名為 yerin baek 或 yerin，是 韓國 創作歌手 及前女子組合 15& 成員。, deepfake a read more. 털은 시간이 지날수록 자라나기 때문에 저는 13일 전쯤 권장드려요. 후타나리채널

히토미 게이물 그렇다면 일상생활 → 바로 바디프로필 준비하시는 분들은 얼마나 혼란이 많을까. 오늘도 분내에 정신 못차리는 장사의신 @jangsin_official 장사의신 은현장 홀까닭 original sound candy peach original sound armin arshe. Cloudpeople onlyfans 홀까닭 바디프로필. Com › svc › news_view몸에 바디로션 바르는 김에 ‘얼굴’까지 발랐다간. ️광안리치킨 홀까닭️ on instagram 가게 7년 운영하면서.

히메노 히나노 3,589 followers, 690 following, 82 posts ️광안리치킨 홀까닭 ️ @holkkadak_ on instagram 🌸광안리치킨맛집🌸 🐔장신 대표님 컨설팅_홀까닭🐔 광안리치킨 광안역맛집 광안리역맛집ㅣ광안역치킨 ㅣ광안리맛집 까닭이사장 @ggabii_n ⠀ 숯불치킨 치즈순살숯불. 아이폰스냅 부산아이폰스냅 아이폰서브스냅 부산서브스냅 부산본식스냅 본식스냅 부산웨딩 부산웨딩스냅 부산웨딩스튜디오 부산웨딩촬영 그랜드모먼트웨딩홀 그랜드모먼트 그랜드모먼트시그니처홀 그랜드모먼트. 고참 선수들 어려운 상황에서도 경기 잘 이끌어 줘3연패. 바디프로필 특성상 노출이 많아지는 옷을 입다보니 왁싱은 필수. Official 프로필 하단의 링크로 들어오시면 셔터홀의 사진과 상품정보를 확인할 수 있어요.

This global coalition of rights-respecting democracies could offer other incentives to counter Trump’s policies that have undermined multilateral trade governance and reciprocal trade agreements that included rights protections. Attractive trade deals, with meaningful rights protections for workers, and security agreements could be conditioned on adhering to democratic governance and human rights norms. Democracy already comes with benefits. While autocracies have generally fostered conflict, economic stagnation, or kleptocracy, as evidenced in multiple academic studies, including the work of the Nobel Prize-winning economist Daron Acemoglu, democratic institutions reliably yield economic growth. 

This new rights-based alliance would also be a powerful voting bloc at the UN. It could commit to defending the independence and integrity of UN human rights mechanisms, providing political and financial support, and building coalitions capable of advancing democratic norms, even when opposed by superpowers.

Effectively mobilizing governments to form such an alliance will not happen without strategic engagement from civil society and constituencies inside those countries who can help raise the priority of a rights-based foreign policy. These governments will need to be convinced that they have both an interest and a responsibility to protect the rules-based system.

Projects of this nature are bubbling up. Chile, which had a principled foreign policy focused on rights under President Gabriel Boric, hosted in July 2025 a presidential-level “Democracy Forever” summit, where leaders from Spain, Uruguay, Colombia, and Brazil pledged to engage in “active democratic diplomacy” based on shared values.

The Hague Group, led by Malaysia, South Africa, and Colombia, formed in January 2025 in “defense of international law” and in solidarity with Palestinians. Over 70 countries from all regions signed a joint statement defending multilateralism at the UN. Earlier, in 2017, former Danish Prime Minister Anders Fogh Rasmussen set up the Alliance of Democracies Foundation to rally the dwindling ranks of democratic countries to “support each other against authoritarian pressures.”

Whatever its precise contours, an alliance of rights-respecting democracies would offer a hopeful counterpoint to the authoritarian trope of China’s and Russia’s leaders standing alongside North Korea’s Kim Jong Un, observing military hardware in a parade in Beijing’s Tiananmen Square in September. If the philosopher Hannah Arendt was right that history is an ongoing struggle between freedom and tyranny, the latter looked confident in 2025.

Yet, even in the worst of times, the idea of freedom and human rights is enduring. People power remains an engine for change. In the US, “No Kings” marches have drawn millions, protesters in Chicago, Minneapolis, Los Angeles, and around the country have stood up against the deployment of the National Guard and ICE abuses, and students are still organizing for Palestine on university campuses despite draconian crackdowns and visa revocations.

Buoyed by popular resistance, South Korean parliamentarians impeached their president to prevent him from grabbing power through martial law. Grassroots aid efforts by Sudan’s emergency response rooms, Hong Kong’s fire relief, Sri Lanka’s cyclone relief community kitchens, and Ukrainian mutual aid and solidarity collectives represent the best of this trend.

In 2025, Gen Z protests against corruption, inadequate public services, and poor governance in Nepal, Indonesia, and Morocco brought to the forefront the need for governments to listen to their youth and tackle corruption and inequality. But as the difficulties of restoring rights in Bangladesh after years under an authoritarian government illustrates, gains won through public mobilization can easily be lost unless democratic participation and free expression remain unassailable.