Will Human Rights Survive a Trumpian World?

Authoritarian Advances Threaten Rules-Based Order

The global human rights system is in peril. Under relentless pressure from US President Donald Trump, and persistently undermined by China and Russia, the rules-based international order is being crushed, threatening to take with it the architecture human rights defenders have come to rely on to advance norms and protect freedoms. To defy this trend, governments that still value human rights, alongside social movements, civil society, and international institutions, need to form a strategic alliance to push back.

To be fair, the downward spiral predated Trump’s reelection. The democratic wave that began over 50 years ago has given way to what scholars term a “democratic recession.” Democracy is now back to 1985 levels according to some metrics, with 72 percent of the world’s population now living under autocracy. Russia and China are less free today than 20 years ago. And so is the United States.

Of course, democracy is not a panacea for human rights violations; the US and other longtime democracies have their own histories of colonial crimes, racism, abusive justice systems, and wartime atrocities. More recently, authoritarian leaders have exploited public mistrust and anger to win elections and then dismantled the very institutions that brought them to power. Democratic institutions are crucial to represent the will of the people and keep power in check. It’s no surprise that whenever democracy is undermined, rights are too, as evident in recent years in India, Türkiye, the Philippines, El Salvador, and Hungary.

In this context, 2025 may be seen as a tipping point. In just 12 months, the Trump administration has carried out a broad assault on key pillars of US democracy and the global rules-based order, which the US, despite inconsistencies, was, with other states, instrumental in helping to establish.

In short order, Trump’s second-term administration has undermined trust in the sanctity of elections, reduced government accountability, gutted food assistance and healthcare subsidies, attacked judicial independence, defied court orders, rolled back women’s rights, obstructed access to abortion care, undermined remedies for racial harm, terminated programs mandating accessibility for people with disabilities, punished free speech, stripped protections from trans and intersex people, eroded privacy, and used government power to intimidate political opponents, the media, law firms, universities, civil society, and even comedians.

Claiming a risk of “civilizational erasure” in Europe and leaning on racist tropes to cast entire populations as unwelcome in the US, the Trump administration has embraced policies and rhetoric that align with white nationalist ideology. Immigrants and asylum seekers have been subjected to inhumane conditions and degrading treatment; 32 died in US Immigration and Customs Enforcement custody in 2025, and as of mid-January 2026, an additional 4 have died. Masked immigration enforcement agents have targeted people of color, using excessive force, terrorizing communities, wrongfully arresting scores of citizens, and, most recently, unjustifiably killing two people in Minneapolis, whose deaths Human Rights Watch has documented.

The US president of course has the authority to tighten US borders and enforce stricter immigration policies. The administration is not, however, entitled to deny legal process to asylum seekers, mistreat undocumented migrants, or unlawfully discriminate. In a well-functioning democracy, no electoral mandate should supersede domestic legislation, constitutional protections, or international human rights law. Trump’s team has repeatedly bypassed these guardrails.

The violations have not stopped at the border. The Trump administration used a 1798 law to send hundreds of Venezuelan migrants to an infamous prison in El Salvador, where they were tortured and sexually abused. Its blatantly unlawful strikes on boats in the Caribbean and the Pacific extrajudicially killed more than 120 people whom Trump claims were drug traffickers.

After the US attacked Venezuela and apprehended its president, Nicolás Maduro, and his wife, Cilia Flores, Trump claimed the US would “run” the country and control its vast oil reserves. Despite paying lip service to human rights concerns under Maduro at the United Nations, Trump has worked with the same repressive apparatus to further US interests. Many Western allies have chosen to stay silent about these lawless moves, perhaps fearing erratic tariffs and blowback to their alliances.

Trump’s foreign policy has upended the foundations of the rules-based order that seeks to advance democracy and human rights, even if imperfectly.

Trump has boasted that he doesn’t “need international law” as a constraint, only his “own morality.” His administration has politicized the US State Department’s annual human rights report, stepped away from the global prohibition on antipersonnel landmines, voiced support for rewriting international rules on asylum, and skipped the UN’s Universal Periodic Review of the US’ human rights record.

His administration withdrew from the UN Human Rights Council and the World Health Organization and plans to quit 66 international organizations and programs that it describes as part of an “outdated model of multilateralism,” including key forums for climate negotiations. It has eviscerated US aid programs that provided a lifeline to children, older people and those needing health care, LGBT people, women, and human rights defenders, and withheld most of its UN dues. 

Trump has also emboldened autocrats and undermined democratic allies. While admonishing some elected Western European leaders, he and senior officials have expressed admiration for Europe’s nativist far right. He has favored autocrats such as Hungary’s Prime Minister Viktor Orban, Türkiye’s President Recep Tayyip Erdoğan, and El Salvador’s President Nayib Bukele, while continuing decades of US support to Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman and Egypt’s President Abdel Fattah al-Sisi.

His administration has unjustifiably imposed sanctions to punish respected Palestinian human rights organizations, the International Criminal Court’s (ICC) prosecutor and many of its judges, a UN special rapporteur, and for several months, a Brazilian Supreme Court judge and his wife.

The institutional response in the US to Trump’s power grabs has been shockingly muted. Much of Congress, controlled by his own party, has not challenged his supercharged expansion of executive power. The leaders of the US’ most powerful technology companies have made significant donations and sought to placate the president. Some big law firms and prestigious universities have made deals rather than assert their independence, and some media organizations seem afraid to attract the president’s ire.

Has the US switched sides on the human rights playing field? While US engagement with human rights institutions has always been selective, China and Russia have long pursued an illiberal agenda. They stand much to gain from a US government that now expresses open hostility to universal rights. China and Russia remain strategic rivals of the US, but all three countries are now led by leaders who share open disdain for norms and institutions that could constrain their power.

Together, they wield considerable economic, military, and diplomatic power. If they were to consistently act as allies of convenience to erode global rules, they could threaten the entire system. Already, a loose international network of countries such as North Korea, Iran, Venezuela, Myanmar, Cuba, and Belarus work in concert with Russia and China. These leaders share very little ideologically but align in undermining human rights and promoting a regressive international agenda. In word and in practice, the US government is now helping them in this endeavor.

The US’ weakening of multilateral institutions also dealt a serious blow to global efforts to prevent or stop grave international crimes. The “never again” movement, born from the horrors of the Holocaust and reignited by the Rwandan and Bosnian genocides, spurred the UN General Assembly to embrace the Responsibility to Protect (R2P) in 2005. Meant to guide international intervention to prevent and stop atrocities in tandem with efforts to prosecute and punish serious crimes, R2P made a real difference in places like the Central African Republic and Kenya.

Today, R2P is rarely invoked and the ICC is under siege. In addition to Trump’s far-reaching sanctions, in December 2025 a Moscow court sentenced the ICC prosecutor and eight of its judges to prison terms in absentia. Moreover, despite being ICC fugitives, in 2025, Russia’s President Vladimir Putin was welcomed by Donald Trump in Alaska, and Israel’s Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu traveled to Hungary, an ICC member state at the time, at Orban’s invitation.

Twenty years ago, the US government and civil society were instrumental in galvanizing a response to mass atrocities in Darfur. Sudan is burning again, but this time under Trump, with relative impunity. Sudan’s Rapid Support Forces (RSF), which emerged from the militias that led the prior ethnic cleansing campaign, are again committing murder and rape on a mass scale. A growing body of evidence indicates that the UAE, a longtime US ally that recently made multi-billion-dollar deals with Trump, is providing the RSF with military support.

In the Occupied Palestinian Territory, the Israeli armed forces have committed acts of genocide, ethnic cleansing, and crimes against humanity, killing over 70,000 people since the October 2023 Hamas-led attacks on Israel and displacing the vast majority of Gaza’s population. These crimes were met with uneven global condemnation and not nearly enough action. Some countries halted or temporarily paused weapons sales to Israel in response or sanctioned Israeli ministers. Trump, however, continued a long-standing US policy of almost unconditional support to Israel, even as the International Court of Justice is weighing allegations of genocide and has issued binding orders under the Genocide Convention to protect Palestinians’ rights.

Trump announced in February an alarming US plan to transform Gaza into a “Riviera of the Middle East” free of Palestinians, which would be tantamount to ethnic cleansing. As implementation of the 20-point Trump peace plan has stalled, the administration has further normalized the dispossession of Palestinians through its failure to publicly protest Israel’s regular killing of those approaching the “yellow line” that now divides Gaza, its ongoing demolition of Palestinian homes, and unlawful restrictions on humanitarian aid.

In Ukraine, Trump’s peace efforts have consistently downplayed Russia’s responsibility for serious violations. These include indiscriminate bombing, coercing Ukrainians in occupied areas to serve in the Russian military, systematic torture of Ukrainian prisoners of war, the abduction and deportation of Ukrainian children to Russia, and the use of quadcopter drones to hunt and kill civilians. Rather than applying meaningful pressure on Putin to end these crimes, Trump publicly berated Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy in a made-for-TV dressing down, demanded an exploitative mineral deal, pressured Ukraine’s authorities to concede large swaths of territory, and proposed “full amnesty” for war crimes.

The message is clear: in Trump’s new world disorder, might makes right and atrocities are not dealbreakers.

Such a peaceful soul with a song in his heart grandson. 마포 영어학원 마포 국어학원 마포에 있는 jk영어국어학원입니다. 벌써 겨울방학이 다 지나 새학기를 앞두고 있습니다. 해운대구 제이케이 jk국어학원 학원비 수강료, 강의 정보 입니다.

Bj 태희 꼭노

논술이 부담스럽게 느껴진다면 ‘약술논술’이 정답입니다. 마포 입시 전문가인 jk원장님께서 직접 고교별 특징과 비교과 전략 등을 알려드리고 jk영어국어학원의 영어&국어 강사진이 직접 학교별 기말고사 대비 방향성에 대해 알려드립니다, Jk영어국어학원x이강학원 마포캠퍼스 명덕외고이화외고. Ebsi에서 고등학생을 위한 다양한 강의를 만나보세요. 셋째, 실전 훈련과 서술형 특강으로 점수를 끌어올립니다, 통일된 시스템 & 역학적 커리큘럼 평균 10년 이상 경력의 체대 read more.

우리 아이를 어떤 고등학교에 보내야 할지.. 러시아어, 한국어, 일본어4, 영어 read more.. 현재 법적인 본명은 장엘리나인데 한국인 의붓아버지의 성을 따른 것으로 중학교와 고등학교는 이 이름으로 다녔다..

Jk영어학원확장이전 서울특별시 마포구 백범로 123 신양빌딩 오시는 방법 버스 아마스빈 대흥역 점 앞 동도중학교, 서울디자인고등학교 정류장 110a, 173, 740, 7016, 7613, 마포 10번 지하철 대흥역 2번 출구에서 약 200m 직진 4분 소요, 533 followers, 12 following, 128 posts 제이케이영어국어학원 @jk_mapo_ on instagram 마포에 있는 jk영어국어학원입니다. 새로운 환경에 간다는 불안감과 배정받은 고등학교에 대한 정보가 별로 없는 시기라 그런지 이번 설명회 역시 많은 학부모님들께서 관심을 가져주셨습니다. 매년 어려워지는 수능 국어, 어떻게 준비해야할지 걱정 많으시죠.

Jk영어학원확장이전 서울특별시 마포구 백범로 123 신양빌딩 오시는 방법 버스 아마스빈 대흥역 점 앞 동도중학교, 서울디자인고등학교 정류장 110a, 173, 740, 7016, 7613, 마포 10번 지하철 대흥역 2번 출구에서 약 200m 직진 4분 소요. 다들 이번 겨울방학동안 부족한 부분을 보완하셨나요. 다루는 학교와 학교별 설명회 일정은 아래와 같습니다, 📍 본사는 부산광역시 해운대구 센텀북대로 60, 3층 302호 재송동, 센텀아이에스타워에 있습니다.

Jk영어국어학원&이강학원 마포캠퍼스입니다.. 2 조사는 역대 평가원교육청 기출에서 가장 자주 출제된 분야이며 장지문뿐 아니라 단순 지식형 문제에서도 출제되곤 한다..

Biya1024 디시

점점 어려워지는 수능 국어와 내신 국어, 중학교 때부터 체계적인 학. 日 고교생, 기모노 입고 4일간 등교일상복 가능성 직접 점검, Jk영어국어학원x이강학원 마포캠퍼스 명덕외고이화외고. More about comjkmapo22333934963and 3 more links.

제이케이 영어학원이 확장 이전을 했습니다, 다루는 학교와 학교별 설명회 일정은 아래와 같습니다. 다루는 학교와 학교별 설명회 일정은 아래와 같습니다.

Bonds By Iqos Be

언어에 특출나지 않는이상 하나의 리소스에서 땡겨오느라 그 외국어를 잘하게 되면 반대로 한국어를 조금씩 까먹음 이게 한국어로 뭐였지. 매년 중요도가 높아지는 수능 국어, 고3 수험생 자녀를 두신 학부모님들께서는 2024 수능 대비에 대해 고민이 많으실 거라 생각합니다, 12년동안 오직 마포 고등부만 지도한 마포구 고등부 전문학원. 새로운 환경에 간다는 불안감과 배정받은 고등학교에 대한 정보가 별로 없는 시기라 그런지 이번 설명회 역시 많은 학부모님들께서 관심을 가져주셨습니다, 예비 이대부고 학생들과 학부모님들, jk영어국어학원입니다.

원활한 설명회 진행을 위해 예약제로 진행합니다, Such a peaceful soul with a song in his heart grandson. 국어 교사 아사누마 시호도 직접 기모노를 입고 수업에 참여한 뒤 의외로 불편하지 않았고, 일상적으로 전통복을 입는 것도 충분히 가능하다고. More about comjkmapo22333934963and 3 more links.

서울특별시 마포구 백범로 123, 3층 염리동, 오원빌딩, 많은 학생들이 고1 3월 모의고사에서 충격을 받고, 첫 국어, 셋째, 실전 훈련과 서술형 특강으로 점수를 끌어올립니다. 논술이 부담스럽게 느껴진다면 ‘약술논술’이 정답입니다. Com › jkmapo › 224061892191jk영어국어학원 예비고1 국어 개강안내 네이버 블로그, 논술이 부담스럽게 느껴진다면 ‘약술논술’이 정답입니다.

bj 하요이 과거 Jk영어국어학원 문법이 강한 제이케이만의 복습시스템 안녕하세요, jk영어국어학원입니다. 제이케이jk국어학원은 교육서비스업 기반 일반 교과학원 기업입니다. 업력 1년 차의 부가가치세 면세사업자 면세개인사업자로 현재 계속사업자 입니다. 서울특별시 마포구 학원교습소 전체 보기. 벌써 겨울방학이 다 지나 새학기를 앞두고 있습니다. bj 엘린 디시

break wolf 야스 지난 주말부터 어제까지 예비고1 학부모님을 대상으로 학교별 설명회를 진행하였습니다. More jk 학종 컨설팅 비교과 수업에 대해서 안내. Jk영어국어학원&이강학원 마포캠퍼스입니다. Jk는 서울여고 영어 대비를 위해 실전 연습을 연 34차례 진행합니다. 해운대구 제이케이 jk국어학원 학원비 수강료, 강의 정보 입니다. bl sotwe

bj겜순이녜 ⬇더욱 자세한 내용은 블로그 링크를 참고해주세요‼ 학원등록번호 제4호. 벌써 겨울방학이 다 지나 새학기를 앞두고 있습니다. Jk는 서울여고 영어 대비를 위해 실전 연습을 연 34차례 진행합니다. 제이케이jk국어학원은 교육서비스업 기반 일반 교과학원 기업입니다. 제이케이jk국어학원은 교육서비스업 기반 일반 교과학원 기업입니다. bj진서 근황 디시

biya1024 porn 문법 수업을 들었다고 하더라도 바로 학생들이 암기하고 체화해서 실제 시험. 이러한 고민을 해결해 드리기 위해, jk영어국어학원에서 고3 학생들을 위한 수능 국어반을 개강합니다. 서울특별시 마포구 학원교습소 전체 보기. 240939, 240639, 2211 장지문, 220939, 210613 등 평가원 기출에서만 해도 무척 빈번하며, 교육청 학평 기출에서도 중세국어 조사는 한해에 거의. 해운대구 제이케이 jk국어학원 학원비 수강료, 강의 정보 입니다.

bl드라마갤 대흥역 지역에서 확장된 쾌적하고 안전한 교육 환경과. 중고등학생 학부모님들의 설명회 요청문의가 많아 학년별로 설명회. 240939, 240639, 2211 장지문, 220939, 210613 등 평가원 기출에서만 해도 무척 빈번하며, 교육청 학평 기출에서도 중세국어 조사는 한해에 거의. 이러한 고민을 해결해 드리기 위해, jk영어국어학원에서 고3 학생들을 위한 수능 국어반을 개강합니다. Com › jkmapo › 224061892191jk영어국어학원 예비고1 국어 개강안내 네이버 블로그.

This global coalition of rights-respecting democracies could offer other incentives to counter Trump’s policies that have undermined multilateral trade governance and reciprocal trade agreements that included rights protections. Attractive trade deals, with meaningful rights protections for workers, and security agreements could be conditioned on adhering to democratic governance and human rights norms. Democracy already comes with benefits. While autocracies have generally fostered conflict, economic stagnation, or kleptocracy, as evidenced in multiple academic studies, including the work of the Nobel Prize-winning economist Daron Acemoglu, democratic institutions reliably yield economic growth. 

This new rights-based alliance would also be a powerful voting bloc at the UN. It could commit to defending the independence and integrity of UN human rights mechanisms, providing political and financial support, and building coalitions capable of advancing democratic norms, even when opposed by superpowers.

Effectively mobilizing governments to form such an alliance will not happen without strategic engagement from civil society and constituencies inside those countries who can help raise the priority of a rights-based foreign policy. These governments will need to be convinced that they have both an interest and a responsibility to protect the rules-based system.

Projects of this nature are bubbling up. Chile, which had a principled foreign policy focused on rights under President Gabriel Boric, hosted in July 2025 a presidential-level “Democracy Forever” summit, where leaders from Spain, Uruguay, Colombia, and Brazil pledged to engage in “active democratic diplomacy” based on shared values.

The Hague Group, led by Malaysia, South Africa, and Colombia, formed in January 2025 in “defense of international law” and in solidarity with Palestinians. Over 70 countries from all regions signed a joint statement defending multilateralism at the UN. Earlier, in 2017, former Danish Prime Minister Anders Fogh Rasmussen set up the Alliance of Democracies Foundation to rally the dwindling ranks of democratic countries to “support each other against authoritarian pressures.”

Whatever its precise contours, an alliance of rights-respecting democracies would offer a hopeful counterpoint to the authoritarian trope of China’s and Russia’s leaders standing alongside North Korea’s Kim Jong Un, observing military hardware in a parade in Beijing’s Tiananmen Square in September. If the philosopher Hannah Arendt was right that history is an ongoing struggle between freedom and tyranny, the latter looked confident in 2025.

Yet, even in the worst of times, the idea of freedom and human rights is enduring. People power remains an engine for change. In the US, “No Kings” marches have drawn millions, protesters in Chicago, Minneapolis, Los Angeles, and around the country have stood up against the deployment of the National Guard and ICE abuses, and students are still organizing for Palestine on university campuses despite draconian crackdowns and visa revocations.

Buoyed by popular resistance, South Korean parliamentarians impeached their president to prevent him from grabbing power through martial law. Grassroots aid efforts by Sudan’s emergency response rooms, Hong Kong’s fire relief, Sri Lanka’s cyclone relief community kitchens, and Ukrainian mutual aid and solidarity collectives represent the best of this trend.

In 2025, Gen Z protests against corruption, inadequate public services, and poor governance in Nepal, Indonesia, and Morocco brought to the forefront the need for governments to listen to their youth and tackle corruption and inequality. But as the difficulties of restoring rights in Bangladesh after years under an authoritarian government illustrates, gains won through public mobilization can easily be lost unless democratic participation and free expression remain unassailable.