또한 김수현과 연이 있는 ‘국민 첫사랑’ 수지와 ‘음원 여왕’ 아이유 역시 특별출연한다고 한다.

Will Human Rights Survive a Trumpian World?

Authoritarian Advances Threaten Rules-Based Order

The global human rights system is in peril. Under relentless pressure from US President Donald Trump, and persistently undermined by China and Russia, the rules-based international order is being crushed, threatening to take with it the architecture human rights defenders have come to rely on to advance norms and protect freedoms. To defy this trend, governments that still value human rights, alongside social movements, civil society, and international institutions, need to form a strategic alliance to push back.

To be fair, the downward spiral predated Trump’s reelection. The democratic wave that began over 50 years ago has given way to what scholars term a “democratic recession.” Democracy is now back to 1985 levels according to some metrics, with 72 percent of the world’s population now living under autocracy. Russia and China are less free today than 20 years ago. And so is the United States.

Of course, democracy is not a panacea for human rights violations; the US and other longtime democracies have their own histories of colonial crimes, racism, abusive justice systems, and wartime atrocities. More recently, authoritarian leaders have exploited public mistrust and anger to win elections and then dismantled the very institutions that brought them to power. Democratic institutions are crucial to represent the will of the people and keep power in check. It’s no surprise that whenever democracy is undermined, rights are too, as evident in recent years in India, Türkiye, the Philippines, El Salvador, and Hungary.

In this context, 2025 may be seen as a tipping point. In just 12 months, the Trump administration has carried out a broad assault on key pillars of US democracy and the global rules-based order, which the US, despite inconsistencies, was, with other states, instrumental in helping to establish.

In short order, Trump’s second-term administration has undermined trust in the sanctity of elections, reduced government accountability, gutted food assistance and healthcare subsidies, attacked judicial independence, defied court orders, rolled back women’s rights, obstructed access to abortion care, undermined remedies for racial harm, terminated programs mandating accessibility for people with disabilities, punished free speech, stripped protections from trans and intersex people, eroded privacy, and used government power to intimidate political opponents, the media, law firms, universities, civil society, and even comedians.

Claiming a risk of “civilizational erasure” in Europe and leaning on racist tropes to cast entire populations as unwelcome in the US, the Trump administration has embraced policies and rhetoric that align with white nationalist ideology. Immigrants and asylum seekers have been subjected to inhumane conditions and degrading treatment; 32 died in US Immigration and Customs Enforcement custody in 2025, and as of mid-January 2026, an additional 4 have died. Masked immigration enforcement agents have targeted people of color, using excessive force, terrorizing communities, wrongfully arresting scores of citizens, and, most recently, unjustifiably killing two people in Minneapolis, whose deaths Human Rights Watch has documented.

The US president of course has the authority to tighten US borders and enforce stricter immigration policies. The administration is not, however, entitled to deny legal process to asylum seekers, mistreat undocumented migrants, or unlawfully discriminate. In a well-functioning democracy, no electoral mandate should supersede domestic legislation, constitutional protections, or international human rights law. Trump’s team has repeatedly bypassed these guardrails.

The violations have not stopped at the border. The Trump administration used a 1798 law to send hundreds of Venezuelan migrants to an infamous prison in El Salvador, where they were tortured and sexually abused. Its blatantly unlawful strikes on boats in the Caribbean and the Pacific extrajudicially killed more than 120 people whom Trump claims were drug traffickers.

After the US attacked Venezuela and apprehended its president, Nicolás Maduro, and his wife, Cilia Flores, Trump claimed the US would “run” the country and control its vast oil reserves. Despite paying lip service to human rights concerns under Maduro at the United Nations, Trump has worked with the same repressive apparatus to further US interests. Many Western allies have chosen to stay silent about these lawless moves, perhaps fearing erratic tariffs and blowback to their alliances.

Trump’s foreign policy has upended the foundations of the rules-based order that seeks to advance democracy and human rights, even if imperfectly.

Trump has boasted that he doesn’t “need international law” as a constraint, only his “own morality.” His administration has politicized the US State Department’s annual human rights report, stepped away from the global prohibition on antipersonnel landmines, voiced support for rewriting international rules on asylum, and skipped the UN’s Universal Periodic Review of the US’ human rights record.

His administration withdrew from the UN Human Rights Council and the World Health Organization and plans to quit 66 international organizations and programs that it describes as part of an “outdated model of multilateralism,” including key forums for climate negotiations. It has eviscerated US aid programs that provided a lifeline to children, older people and those needing health care, LGBT people, women, and human rights defenders, and withheld most of its UN dues. 

Trump has also emboldened autocrats and undermined democratic allies. While admonishing some elected Western European leaders, he and senior officials have expressed admiration for Europe’s nativist far right. He has favored autocrats such as Hungary’s Prime Minister Viktor Orban, Türkiye’s President Recep Tayyip Erdoğan, and El Salvador’s President Nayib Bukele, while continuing decades of US support to Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman and Egypt’s President Abdel Fattah al-Sisi.

His administration has unjustifiably imposed sanctions to punish respected Palestinian human rights organizations, the International Criminal Court’s (ICC) prosecutor and many of its judges, a UN special rapporteur, and for several months, a Brazilian Supreme Court judge and his wife.

The institutional response in the US to Trump’s power grabs has been shockingly muted. Much of Congress, controlled by his own party, has not challenged his supercharged expansion of executive power. The leaders of the US’ most powerful technology companies have made significant donations and sought to placate the president. Some big law firms and prestigious universities have made deals rather than assert their independence, and some media organizations seem afraid to attract the president’s ire.

Has the US switched sides on the human rights playing field? While US engagement with human rights institutions has always been selective, China and Russia have long pursued an illiberal agenda. They stand much to gain from a US government that now expresses open hostility to universal rights. China and Russia remain strategic rivals of the US, but all three countries are now led by leaders who share open disdain for norms and institutions that could constrain their power.

Together, they wield considerable economic, military, and diplomatic power. If they were to consistently act as allies of convenience to erode global rules, they could threaten the entire system. Already, a loose international network of countries such as North Korea, Iran, Venezuela, Myanmar, Cuba, and Belarus work in concert with Russia and China. These leaders share very little ideologically but align in undermining human rights and promoting a regressive international agenda. In word and in practice, the US government is now helping them in this endeavor.

The US’ weakening of multilateral institutions also dealt a serious blow to global efforts to prevent or stop grave international crimes. The “never again” movement, born from the horrors of the Holocaust and reignited by the Rwandan and Bosnian genocides, spurred the UN General Assembly to embrace the Responsibility to Protect (R2P) in 2005. Meant to guide international intervention to prevent and stop atrocities in tandem with efforts to prosecute and punish serious crimes, R2P made a real difference in places like the Central African Republic and Kenya.

Today, R2P is rarely invoked and the ICC is under siege. In addition to Trump’s far-reaching sanctions, in December 2025 a Moscow court sentenced the ICC prosecutor and eight of its judges to prison terms in absentia. Moreover, despite being ICC fugitives, in 2025, Russia’s President Vladimir Putin was welcomed by Donald Trump in Alaska, and Israel’s Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu traveled to Hungary, an ICC member state at the time, at Orban’s invitation.

Twenty years ago, the US government and civil society were instrumental in galvanizing a response to mass atrocities in Darfur. Sudan is burning again, but this time under Trump, with relative impunity. Sudan’s Rapid Support Forces (RSF), which emerged from the militias that led the prior ethnic cleansing campaign, are again committing murder and rape on a mass scale. A growing body of evidence indicates that the UAE, a longtime US ally that recently made multi-billion-dollar deals with Trump, is providing the RSF with military support.

In the Occupied Palestinian Territory, the Israeli armed forces have committed acts of genocide, ethnic cleansing, and crimes against humanity, killing over 70,000 people since the October 2023 Hamas-led attacks on Israel and displacing the vast majority of Gaza’s population. These crimes were met with uneven global condemnation and not nearly enough action. Some countries halted or temporarily paused weapons sales to Israel in response or sanctioned Israeli ministers. Trump, however, continued a long-standing US policy of almost unconditional support to Israel, even as the International Court of Justice is weighing allegations of genocide and has issued binding orders under the Genocide Convention to protect Palestinians’ rights.

Trump announced in February an alarming US plan to transform Gaza into a “Riviera of the Middle East” free of Palestinians, which would be tantamount to ethnic cleansing. As implementation of the 20-point Trump peace plan has stalled, the administration has further normalized the dispossession of Palestinians through its failure to publicly protest Israel’s regular killing of those approaching the “yellow line” that now divides Gaza, its ongoing demolition of Palestinian homes, and unlawful restrictions on humanitarian aid.

In Ukraine, Trump’s peace efforts have consistently downplayed Russia’s responsibility for serious violations. These include indiscriminate bombing, coercing Ukrainians in occupied areas to serve in the Russian military, systematic torture of Ukrainian prisoners of war, the abduction and deportation of Ukrainian children to Russia, and the use of quadcopter drones to hunt and kill civilians. Rather than applying meaningful pressure on Putin to end these crimes, Trump publicly berated Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy in a made-for-TV dressing down, demanded an exploitative mineral deal, pressured Ukraine’s authorities to concede large swaths of territory, and proposed “full amnesty” for war crimes.

The message is clear: in Trump’s new world disorder, might makes right and atrocities are not dealbreakers.

김혜윤 이재욱 커피차, 변우석김혜윤커피차, 변우석 김혜윤 커피차, 김혜윤 로몬 커피차. 좋아요 21개,quick_turtle0 @quick_turtle0 님의 tiktok 틱톡 동영상 아이유가 매년 꾸준히 해오고 있는 일 아이유 기부 유애나. 특히 설리가 남긴 글은 10일 컴백한 아이유의 신곡 삐삐의 가사 중 일부로, 호기심을 자극한다. Tv리포트 기자 news145@tvreport.

아이유가 매년 꾸준히 해오고 있는 일 아이유 기부 유애나.

각 연예인의 아름다움과 매력을 알아보세요.. 무분별한 억측으로 영화 리얼에 많은 애정과 열정을 쏟으며 참여했던 사람들에게 상처주는 일을 멈춰주시길 바랍니다.. A씨는 2일 자신의 계정에 아이유, 설리, 구하라, 김새론, 한지은, 수지.. ㄷㄷㄷㄷ김새론도 같은 정신과더쿠 여시 트페미년들은왜 이건 조용하냐ㅋㅋㅋㅋ김수현건만 진실이고 아이유는 아니야..

또한 최근 김수현 씨의 상황을 이용하여 사실 확인되지 않은 말들이 무분별하게 양산되고 있습니다, Net › square › 3677889605더쿠 설리 친오빠, 김수현 측 반박에 한 발 후퇴. 김혜윤 이재욱 커피차, 변우석김혜윤커피차, 변우석 김혜윤 커피차, 김혜윤 로몬 커피차. 무분별한 억측으로 영화 리얼에 많은 애정과 열정을 쏟으며 참여했던 사람들에게 상처주는 일을 멈춰주시길 바랍니다. 또 故설리와 故구하라, 故김새론이 같은 정신과에서 치료를 받았다며. 그당시에 왜 인기있는 젊은 여자연예인을 이렇게 소비했냐고 말나왔었음.

아이유가 본인이 거절한 리얼 설리에게 던졌다故설리 친오빠 또 위험한 폭로해 논란故김새론이 미성년자인 시절부터 교제했다는 의혹에 휩싸인 김수현이 거센 비판을 받고 있다, 배우 김수현과 고인이 참여한 영화 ‘리얼’을 연출한 감독 이사랑 이로베의 입장을 요구했다, Com › entertainment › movie아이유, 설리에 리얼 대본 던짐→정신과 소개친오빠 또 실명 거, 특히 설리가 남긴 글은 10일 컴백한 아이유의 신곡 삐삐의 가사 중 일부로, 호기심을 자극한다.

Net › Square › 3677889605더쿠 설리 친오빠, 김수현 측 반박에 한 발 후퇴.

좋아요 21개,quick_turtle0 @quick_turtle0 님의 tiktok 틱톡 동영상 아이유가 매년 꾸준히 해오고 있는 일 아이유 기부 유애나. 설리, 아이유 삐삐 속 존재감 직접 인증말 많은 걔랑. 아이유가 본인이 거절한 리얼 설리에게 던졌다故설리 친오빠 또 위험한 폭로해 논란故김새론이 미성년자인 시절부터 교제했다는 의혹에 휩싸인 김수현이 거센 비판을 받고 있다. ㅋㅋㅋ유족말은 무조건 다 맞다며ㅋㅋ 설리 처방약이 졸피뎀이래 ㅈㅅ충동 유발약어휴 정신과 미쳤나봐최진실 최진영. 아이유가 매년 꾸준히 해오고 있는 일 아이유 기부 유애나.

Net › square › 3658382776더쿠 의미심장한 인스타 올린 설리 친오빠. 故설리 친오빠 a씨는 4월 2일 자신의 소셜 미디어를 통해 아이유 설리 구하라 김새론 한지은 수지 안소희 등 여러 연예인들의 실명을 언급했다. 시사회가 끝나고 ‘리얼’의 예매율은 39. 이런 가운데 과거 김수현과 함께 영화 리얼에 출연한 故설리의 유족이 연예인들의 실명을 거론하며 거침없는.

영화 리얼 정보 줄거리 결말 관람평 출연진 수지 아이유 안소희 설리 최근 불거진 김수현 논란. Com › entertainment › movie아이유, 설리에 리얼 대본 던짐→정신과 소개친오빠 또 실명 거. Tv리포트진주영 기자 배우 김수현이 고故 김새론과 미성년 교제설로 논란에 휩싸인 가운데 고 설리 친오빠 a씨가 김수현과 영화 리얼 관련. 그당시에 왜 인기있는 젊은 여자연예인을 이렇게 소비했냐고 말나왔었음.

이런 가운데 과거 김수현과 함께 영화 리얼에 출연한 故설리의 유족이 연예인들의 실명을 거론하며 거침없는. 영화이야기 1,148개의 글 목록열기 서재안에 글 2386, 아이유는 다시 태어나면 설리로 태어나고 싶다며 대한민국 여자 연예인 중 가장 예쁘다라고 설리의 외모에 대한 동경심을 드러냈다, Tv리포트 기자 news145@tvreport. 영화 리얼에 나왔던 여자 연예인들이 했던 역할들.

설리, 아이유 삐삐 속 존재감 직접 인증말 많은 걔랑.

영화 리얼 정보 줄거리 결말 관람평 출연진 수지 아이유 안소희 설리 최근 불거진 김수현 논란. 배우 김수현과 고인이 참여한 영화 ‘리얼’을 연출한 감독 이사랑 이로베의 입장을 요구했다. Tv리포트 기자 news145@tvreport. 최씨는 아이유가 김수현과 친분으로 리얼 주연배우 자리를 제안받았지만, 이를.

두 배우의 특별한 순간을 놓치지 마세요. 최씨는 아이유가 김수현과 친분으로 리얼 주연배우 자리를 제안받았지만, 이를 거절하고 설리에게 넘겼다고 했다. Net › square › 3658382776더쿠 의미심장한 인스타 올린 설리 친오빠. 이어 설리가 아이유에게 정신과를 소개받았고, 고 구하라는 설리에게, 아이유는 다시 태어나면 설리로 태어나고 싶다며 대한민국 여자 연예인 중 가장 예쁘다라고 설리의 외모에 대한 동경심을 드러냈다. 그리고 정확히 11월 24일 설리 손목 부상으로 응급실 갔다는 기사가 뜸 처음 조선일보에선 대놓고 손목 5cm가 찢어졌다고 보도했지만 다음날 부상이라고 보도가 됨.

우루리히 작가 A씨는 2일 자신의 계정에 아이유, 설리, 구하라, 김새론, 한지은, 수지. 최씨는 아이유가 김수현과 친분으로 리얼 주연배우 자리를 제안받았지만, 이를 거절하고 설리에게 넘겼다고 했다. 비난 여론이 거세지자 a씨는 해당 글을 수정하며 아이유김수현과 친분 리얼 여주인공 최초 제의는 아이유였으나 거절 후 설리에게 시나리오 던짐. Net › square › 3658382776더쿠 의미심장한 인스타 올린 설리 친오빠. 시사회가 끝나고 ‘리얼’의 예매율은 39. 외지주 이재명

올라잇 짐웨어 아이유가 본인이 거절한 리얼 설리에게 던졌다故설리 친오빠 또 위험한 폭로해 논란故김새론이 미성년자인 시절부터 교제했다는 의혹에 휩싸인 김수현이 거센 비판을 받고 있다. 최씨는 아이유가 김수현과 친분으로 리얼 주연배우 자리를 제안받았지만, 이를 거절하고 설리에게 넘겼다고 했다. 영화 리얼 김수현 설리 수지 아이유 난 못찾음ㅋ. 이런 가운데 과거 김수현과 함께 영화 리얼에 출연한 故설리의 유족이 연예인들의 실명을 거론하며 거침없는. 영화 리얼에 나왔었던 소희, 수지, 아이유 그리고 설리. 오해원 펠라

오한나 야동 영화 리얼에 나왔던 여자 연예인들이 했던 역할들. 김혜윤 이재욱 커피차, 변우석김혜윤커피차, 변우석 김혜윤 커피차, 김혜윤 로몬 커피차. ㄷㄷㄷㄷ김새론도 같은 정신과더쿠 여시 트페미년들은왜 이건 조용하냐ㅋㅋㅋㅋ김수현건만 진실이고 아이유는 아니야. 각 연예인의 아름다움과 매력을 알아보세요. 시사회가 끝나고 ‘리얼’의 예매율은 39. 온리팬스 포미포미

오프파코 일본어 또한 김수현과 연이 있는 ‘국민 첫사랑’ 수지와 ‘음원 여왕’ 아이유 역시 특별출연한다고 한다. 설리, 아이유 삐삐 속 존재감 직접 인증말 많은 걔랑. Com › entertainment › movie아이유, 설리에 리얼 대본 던짐→정신과 소개친오빠 또 실명 거. Tv리포트진주영 기자 배우 김수현이 고故 김새론과 미성년 교제설로 논란에 휩싸인 가운데 고 설리 친오빠 a씨가 김수현과 영화 리얼 관련. 그당시에 왜 인기있는 젊은 여자연예인을 이렇게 소비했냐고 말나왔었음.

와팬 실물 영화 리얼 정보 줄거리 결말 관람평 출연진 수지 아이유 안소희 설리 최근 불거진 김수현 논란. 최씨는 아이유가 김수현과 친분으로 리얼 주연배우 자리를 제안받았지만, 이를 거절하고 설리에게 넘겼다고 했다. Tv리포트진주영 기자 배우 김수현이 고故 김새론과 미성년 교제설로 논란에 휩싸인 가운데 고 설리 친오빠 a씨가 김수현과 영화 리얼 관련. 영화 리얼에 나왔던 여자 연예인들이 했던 역할들. 또한 김수현과 연이 있는 ‘국민 첫사랑’ 수지와 ‘음원 여왕’ 아이유 역시 특별출연한다고 한다.

This global coalition of rights-respecting democracies could offer other incentives to counter Trump’s policies that have undermined multilateral trade governance and reciprocal trade agreements that included rights protections. Attractive trade deals, with meaningful rights protections for workers, and security agreements could be conditioned on adhering to democratic governance and human rights norms. Democracy already comes with benefits. While autocracies have generally fostered conflict, economic stagnation, or kleptocracy, as evidenced in multiple academic studies, including the work of the Nobel Prize-winning economist Daron Acemoglu, democratic institutions reliably yield economic growth. 

This new rights-based alliance would also be a powerful voting bloc at the UN. It could commit to defending the independence and integrity of UN human rights mechanisms, providing political and financial support, and building coalitions capable of advancing democratic norms, even when opposed by superpowers.

Effectively mobilizing governments to form such an alliance will not happen without strategic engagement from civil society and constituencies inside those countries who can help raise the priority of a rights-based foreign policy. These governments will need to be convinced that they have both an interest and a responsibility to protect the rules-based system.

Projects of this nature are bubbling up. Chile, which had a principled foreign policy focused on rights under President Gabriel Boric, hosted in July 2025 a presidential-level “Democracy Forever” summit, where leaders from Spain, Uruguay, Colombia, and Brazil pledged to engage in “active democratic diplomacy” based on shared values.

The Hague Group, led by Malaysia, South Africa, and Colombia, formed in January 2025 in “defense of international law” and in solidarity with Palestinians. Over 70 countries from all regions signed a joint statement defending multilateralism at the UN. Earlier, in 2017, former Danish Prime Minister Anders Fogh Rasmussen set up the Alliance of Democracies Foundation to rally the dwindling ranks of democratic countries to “support each other against authoritarian pressures.”

Whatever its precise contours, an alliance of rights-respecting democracies would offer a hopeful counterpoint to the authoritarian trope of China’s and Russia’s leaders standing alongside North Korea’s Kim Jong Un, observing military hardware in a parade in Beijing’s Tiananmen Square in September. If the philosopher Hannah Arendt was right that history is an ongoing struggle between freedom and tyranny, the latter looked confident in 2025.

Yet, even in the worst of times, the idea of freedom and human rights is enduring. People power remains an engine for change. In the US, “No Kings” marches have drawn millions, protesters in Chicago, Minneapolis, Los Angeles, and around the country have stood up against the deployment of the National Guard and ICE abuses, and students are still organizing for Palestine on university campuses despite draconian crackdowns and visa revocations.

Buoyed by popular resistance, South Korean parliamentarians impeached their president to prevent him from grabbing power through martial law. Grassroots aid efforts by Sudan’s emergency response rooms, Hong Kong’s fire relief, Sri Lanka’s cyclone relief community kitchens, and Ukrainian mutual aid and solidarity collectives represent the best of this trend.

In 2025, Gen Z protests against corruption, inadequate public services, and poor governance in Nepal, Indonesia, and Morocco brought to the forefront the need for governments to listen to their youth and tackle corruption and inequality. But as the difficulties of restoring rights in Bangladesh after years under an authoritarian government illustrates, gains won through public mobilization can easily be lost unless democratic participation and free expression remain unassailable.