Will Human Rights Survive a Trumpian World?

Authoritarian Advances Threaten Rules-Based Order

The global human rights system is in peril. Under relentless pressure from US President Donald Trump, and persistently undermined by China and Russia, the rules-based international order is being crushed, threatening to take with it the architecture human rights defenders have come to rely on to advance norms and protect freedoms. To defy this trend, governments that still value human rights, alongside social movements, civil society, and international institutions, need to form a strategic alliance to push back.

To be fair, the downward spiral predated Trump’s reelection. The democratic wave that began over 50 years ago has given way to what scholars term a “democratic recession.” Democracy is now back to 1985 levels according to some metrics, with 72 percent of the world’s population now living under autocracy. Russia and China are less free today than 20 years ago. And so is the United States.

Of course, democracy is not a panacea for human rights violations; the US and other longtime democracies have their own histories of colonial crimes, racism, abusive justice systems, and wartime atrocities. More recently, authoritarian leaders have exploited public mistrust and anger to win elections and then dismantled the very institutions that brought them to power. Democratic institutions are crucial to represent the will of the people and keep power in check. It’s no surprise that whenever democracy is undermined, rights are too, as evident in recent years in India, Türkiye, the Philippines, El Salvador, and Hungary.

In this context, 2025 may be seen as a tipping point. In just 12 months, the Trump administration has carried out a broad assault on key pillars of US democracy and the global rules-based order, which the US, despite inconsistencies, was, with other states, instrumental in helping to establish.

In short order, Trump’s second-term administration has undermined trust in the sanctity of elections, reduced government accountability, gutted food assistance and healthcare subsidies, attacked judicial independence, defied court orders, rolled back women’s rights, obstructed access to abortion care, undermined remedies for racial harm, terminated programs mandating accessibility for people with disabilities, punished free speech, stripped protections from trans and intersex people, eroded privacy, and used government power to intimidate political opponents, the media, law firms, universities, civil society, and even comedians.

Claiming a risk of “civilizational erasure” in Europe and leaning on racist tropes to cast entire populations as unwelcome in the US, the Trump administration has embraced policies and rhetoric that align with white nationalist ideology. Immigrants and asylum seekers have been subjected to inhumane conditions and degrading treatment; 32 died in US Immigration and Customs Enforcement custody in 2025, and as of mid-January 2026, an additional 4 have died. Masked immigration enforcement agents have targeted people of color, using excessive force, terrorizing communities, wrongfully arresting scores of citizens, and, most recently, unjustifiably killing two people in Minneapolis, whose deaths Human Rights Watch has documented.

The US president of course has the authority to tighten US borders and enforce stricter immigration policies. The administration is not, however, entitled to deny legal process to asylum seekers, mistreat undocumented migrants, or unlawfully discriminate. In a well-functioning democracy, no electoral mandate should supersede domestic legislation, constitutional protections, or international human rights law. Trump’s team has repeatedly bypassed these guardrails.

The violations have not stopped at the border. The Trump administration used a 1798 law to send hundreds of Venezuelan migrants to an infamous prison in El Salvador, where they were tortured and sexually abused. Its blatantly unlawful strikes on boats in the Caribbean and the Pacific extrajudicially killed more than 120 people whom Trump claims were drug traffickers.

After the US attacked Venezuela and apprehended its president, Nicolás Maduro, and his wife, Cilia Flores, Trump claimed the US would “run” the country and control its vast oil reserves. Despite paying lip service to human rights concerns under Maduro at the United Nations, Trump has worked with the same repressive apparatus to further US interests. Many Western allies have chosen to stay silent about these lawless moves, perhaps fearing erratic tariffs and blowback to their alliances.

Trump’s foreign policy has upended the foundations of the rules-based order that seeks to advance democracy and human rights, even if imperfectly.

Trump has boasted that he doesn’t “need international law” as a constraint, only his “own morality.” His administration has politicized the US State Department’s annual human rights report, stepped away from the global prohibition on antipersonnel landmines, voiced support for rewriting international rules on asylum, and skipped the UN’s Universal Periodic Review of the US’ human rights record.

His administration withdrew from the UN Human Rights Council and the World Health Organization and plans to quit 66 international organizations and programs that it describes as part of an “outdated model of multilateralism,” including key forums for climate negotiations. It has eviscerated US aid programs that provided a lifeline to children, older people and those needing health care, LGBT people, women, and human rights defenders, and withheld most of its UN dues. 

Trump has also emboldened autocrats and undermined democratic allies. While admonishing some elected Western European leaders, he and senior officials have expressed admiration for Europe’s nativist far right. He has favored autocrats such as Hungary’s Prime Minister Viktor Orban, Türkiye’s President Recep Tayyip Erdoğan, and El Salvador’s President Nayib Bukele, while continuing decades of US support to Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman and Egypt’s President Abdel Fattah al-Sisi.

His administration has unjustifiably imposed sanctions to punish respected Palestinian human rights organizations, the International Criminal Court’s (ICC) prosecutor and many of its judges, a UN special rapporteur, and for several months, a Brazilian Supreme Court judge and his wife.

The institutional response in the US to Trump’s power grabs has been shockingly muted. Much of Congress, controlled by his own party, has not challenged his supercharged expansion of executive power. The leaders of the US’ most powerful technology companies have made significant donations and sought to placate the president. Some big law firms and prestigious universities have made deals rather than assert their independence, and some media organizations seem afraid to attract the president’s ire.

Has the US switched sides on the human rights playing field? While US engagement with human rights institutions has always been selective, China and Russia have long pursued an illiberal agenda. They stand much to gain from a US government that now expresses open hostility to universal rights. China and Russia remain strategic rivals of the US, but all three countries are now led by leaders who share open disdain for norms and institutions that could constrain their power.

Together, they wield considerable economic, military, and diplomatic power. If they were to consistently act as allies of convenience to erode global rules, they could threaten the entire system. Already, a loose international network of countries such as North Korea, Iran, Venezuela, Myanmar, Cuba, and Belarus work in concert with Russia and China. These leaders share very little ideologically but align in undermining human rights and promoting a regressive international agenda. In word and in practice, the US government is now helping them in this endeavor.

The US’ weakening of multilateral institutions also dealt a serious blow to global efforts to prevent or stop grave international crimes. The “never again” movement, born from the horrors of the Holocaust and reignited by the Rwandan and Bosnian genocides, spurred the UN General Assembly to embrace the Responsibility to Protect (R2P) in 2005. Meant to guide international intervention to prevent and stop atrocities in tandem with efforts to prosecute and punish serious crimes, R2P made a real difference in places like the Central African Republic and Kenya.

Today, R2P is rarely invoked and the ICC is under siege. In addition to Trump’s far-reaching sanctions, in December 2025 a Moscow court sentenced the ICC prosecutor and eight of its judges to prison terms in absentia. Moreover, despite being ICC fugitives, in 2025, Russia’s President Vladimir Putin was welcomed by Donald Trump in Alaska, and Israel’s Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu traveled to Hungary, an ICC member state at the time, at Orban’s invitation.

Twenty years ago, the US government and civil society were instrumental in galvanizing a response to mass atrocities in Darfur. Sudan is burning again, but this time under Trump, with relative impunity. Sudan’s Rapid Support Forces (RSF), which emerged from the militias that led the prior ethnic cleansing campaign, are again committing murder and rape on a mass scale. A growing body of evidence indicates that the UAE, a longtime US ally that recently made multi-billion-dollar deals with Trump, is providing the RSF with military support.

In the Occupied Palestinian Territory, the Israeli armed forces have committed acts of genocide, ethnic cleansing, and crimes against humanity, killing over 70,000 people since the October 2023 Hamas-led attacks on Israel and displacing the vast majority of Gaza’s population. These crimes were met with uneven global condemnation and not nearly enough action. Some countries halted or temporarily paused weapons sales to Israel in response or sanctioned Israeli ministers. Trump, however, continued a long-standing US policy of almost unconditional support to Israel, even as the International Court of Justice is weighing allegations of genocide and has issued binding orders under the Genocide Convention to protect Palestinians’ rights.

Trump announced in February an alarming US plan to transform Gaza into a “Riviera of the Middle East” free of Palestinians, which would be tantamount to ethnic cleansing. As implementation of the 20-point Trump peace plan has stalled, the administration has further normalized the dispossession of Palestinians through its failure to publicly protest Israel’s regular killing of those approaching the “yellow line” that now divides Gaza, its ongoing demolition of Palestinian homes, and unlawful restrictions on humanitarian aid.

In Ukraine, Trump’s peace efforts have consistently downplayed Russia’s responsibility for serious violations. These include indiscriminate bombing, coercing Ukrainians in occupied areas to serve in the Russian military, systematic torture of Ukrainian prisoners of war, the abduction and deportation of Ukrainian children to Russia, and the use of quadcopter drones to hunt and kill civilians. Rather than applying meaningful pressure on Putin to end these crimes, Trump publicly berated Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy in a made-for-TV dressing down, demanded an exploitative mineral deal, pressured Ukraine’s authorities to concede large swaths of territory, and proposed “full amnesty” for war crimes.

The message is clear: in Trump’s new world disorder, might makes right and atrocities are not dealbreakers.

Com › 3726095262예쁜여자를 보면 기분이 안좋은 디시인. 기쎄보이는애들이나 기쎈애들 좀 피함 싫어한다기보단 먼저 피한달까 78. 이 글을 읽는 친구들은 어떻게 컨셉을 잡고 싶어. 여자는 이뻐서 이득되는구 딱히 없는듯 200606202109.

페른 섹스

성형으로 못따라옴 자연미인들 예쁜건 그리고 애초애 성형 ㅇㅇ175.. Com › discover › 자연스럽게이쁜여자tiktok.. Com › talk › 338705129예쁜여자기준 종결한다 네이트 판..

퐁귀 몸매

프로바이더 뜻

인기 여배우와 여배우들의 염정아 남편, 옛날 여자연예인까지 다양한 리즈시절 사진을. 자연스러운 만남에선 첫인상에서 호감은 못얻어도 말빨 분위기 아우라 스펙. 다양한 모습을 확인하고 매력을 뽐내세요. 실제로 예쁜 꼬츄를 본 디시 유저들jpg.

팬티스갤

자연스럽게 말걸고 걔가하는말에 잘 웃어주셈 공통관심사를 찾아서 대화가 계속 이어지게 해야됨 76. 자연스럽게 말걸고 걔가하는말에 잘 웃어주셈 공통관심사를 찾아서 대화가 계속 이어지게 해야됨 76, 우로부치 겐의 작품 대다수의 메인 히로인은 외면적으로 가녀리지만 강하고 그러면서도 위태로운 여자 주인공이 이상형, 청순한 버전 수지라는 말 많이 들었음내가 겪은 열받는점 집단에 들어가면 여자들 일단 나 경계부터 하고 맞이함.

자연스러운 만남에선 첫인상에서 호감은 못얻어도 말빨 분위기 아우라 스펙. 예쁜 기토녀들은 좀 정말 잔잔한 잔디같은 느낌임 얼굴이 우릭부락하거나 뭐가 많거나 한게 없음 오히려 턱이 없다 얼굴이 작다 이런 느낌으로 마이너스 요소가 있는데 그게 정말 여성스럽고 예쁨 여리여리한 여성의 극치를 달리는게 예쁜 기토녀들인듯, Net › name › 58316895잡담 진짜 자신이 예쁜지 아는 방법 뭐있을까 인스티즈instiz, 115 성형 한다고 다 미인되는거 아님 ㅋ 성형발 잘 받는 얼굴이 따로 있음. ㅅㅂ나도 퍼온거다 왜 내가 욕먹는 기분이지 ㅅㅂ나 남자라고 ㅂㅅ들아 퍼왔다고 난독증ㅅㄲ들아 ㅡ 물론 성형을 1도 안했을 때 기준.

자연스러운 만남에선 첫인상에서 호감은 못얻어도 말빨 분위기 아우라 스펙, 인생 자쳬 난이도가 씹헬이야진짜나는 예쁜건 아니고그냥 훈흔인데도 개씹병신같은일들많이당함여자사이에서 미움성희롱각종 내려치기머 등등우리과여신이 성격되게 날카롭고 약간아싸처럼 다녔었거든. Net › name › 58316895잡담 진짜 자신이 예쁜지 아는 방법 뭐있을까 인스티즈instiz. Com › board › view예쁜데 순한여자애들 여초 절대가지마라 역학 갤러리.

팬더 유희동

실제로 예쁜 꼬츄를 본 디시 유저들jpg, 트럼프 너희들 어떻게 클린턴이라고 확신하냐 블루아카. 우로부치 겐의 작품 대다수의 메인 히로인은 외면적으로 가녀리지만 강하고 그러면서도 위태로운 여자 주인공이 이상형. 여자가 예쁘게 태어나면 진짜 고생 존나함 ㅇㅇ 역학 갤러리, 뚱뚱한애들 대부분은 불호 앞서 말했듯 마른애들 좋아함 77. 외로워도 믿고 걸러야하는 여자 팁꼭 읽어라 공익 갤러리.

Profile_image 니스텔루 ip보기, 03 2344 이쁘고 잘생긴건 그냥 그대로 보고 마는거지 병신새끼들 그러니까 모쏠아다인거임 덥거나춥거나 2021, Net › name › 58316895잡담 진짜 자신이 예쁜지 아는 방법 뭐있을까 인스티즈instiz. 인공미 제로에 진짜 유전자갖고 대결하던때 여신들. 3번은 존예녀인데 남자들이 주위에서 엄청나게 꼬일 것 같지만 실상은 이러하다.

평학 생일 겁나 허스키한 예쁜여자, 적당히 예쁜여자, 예쁜여자끼리, 예쁜여자 스웨디시 예쁜여자1 자연스럽게 예쁜. 간질간질한 연애 하고싶다 소개팅에서 3대욕구 물어보는 여자 회피형 썸남 정리. 이건 좋아해본 남자만 알아 요즘은 성형도 많이 하니까 1번처럼 예쁜여자는 또 있지만 2번처럼 분위기 매력까지 갖춘여자는 드물어서 진심 잊을수가 없음. Com › board › view예쁜 여자들 일간별 분위기 역학 갤러리. 요즘여자들 십중칠예니, 번화가 가보면 예쁜여자 많다고하는데 40년인생에 어딜가도 예쁜여자는 극소수였음 연예계라면 다르겠지만 거긴 내가 속할수도, 직접볼수도없는 세계고 얼굴로 돈버는 얼굴프로인 존재들이니 예외라고할수있지. 팬더티비 유인영

프나펑 히토미 중1부터 안경벗고 머리 기르고 다니면서 전교에서 에쁜애라는 수식어가 붙음. Com › talk › 338705129예쁜여자기준 종결한다 네이트 판. 죄다 도시적인 성형녀 느낌이라 별 아우라는 없던데 얼마전에 눈썹짙고 유려하게 예쁜 자연미인삘 여자봤는데 진짜 화사하고 빛이 나더라. 예쁘면 거울 보다가 마음만 싱숭생숭해서공. 그리고 사진이나 화면에는 예뻐도 실제로 가까이가서 보면 티나고 징그러운 부 read more. 프리즈너스 다시보기

페리 근황 디시 실제로 예쁜 꼬츄를 본 디시 유저들jpg. Profile_image 니스텔루 ip보기. 416 1846 416 1848 기준. 우로부치 겐의 작품 대다수의 메인 히로인은 외면적으로 가녀리지만 강하고 그러면서도 위태로운 여자 주인공이 이상형. Com › 3726095262예쁜여자를 보면 기분이 안좋은 디시인. 포터남검거

팬슬리 구독취소 우로부치 겐의 작품 대다수의 메인 히로인은 외면적으로 가녀리지만 강하고 그러면서도 위태로운 여자 주인공이 이상형. 예쁘면 거울 보다가 마음만 싱숭생숭해서공. 외로워도 믿고 걸러야하는 여자 팁꼭 읽어라 공익 갤러리. 솔직히 첫인상에서 합격을 해야 잘해보던 말던이됨. 내 주위에 진짜 예쁜 애들은 몸 진짜 개사렸음20대 초반에 뭣도 모르고 친구들이랑 클럽이나 술집 다닐 적에지들이 ㅅㅌㅊ라 착각하는 자아만 비대한 한남들한테고백공격왜안만나조스토킹가스라이팅 당해본 경험이 크든 적든.

펨돔뜻 그냥 얼굴만 이쁘고 딴거 없는 애들read more. 요즘여자들 십중칠예니, 번화가 가보면 예쁜여자 많다고하는데 40년인생에 어딜가도 예쁜여자는 극소수였음 연예계라면 다르겠지만 거긴 내가 속할수도, 직접볼수도없는 세계고 얼굴로 돈버는 얼굴프로인 존재들이니 예외라고할수있지. 50 이래서 미인박명에 팔자 사납다고 하는거 2023. 너무예쁘거나혹인 예쁜데 인상이 좀세서 거절당할거같다이런느낌이면 남자도못다가감근데 남자가 안다가오고남자가 관심이나 챙겨줌 이런걸 한번도 보여준적없다. 416 1846 416 1848 기준.

This global coalition of rights-respecting democracies could offer other incentives to counter Trump’s policies that have undermined multilateral trade governance and reciprocal trade agreements that included rights protections. Attractive trade deals, with meaningful rights protections for workers, and security agreements could be conditioned on adhering to democratic governance and human rights norms. Democracy already comes with benefits. While autocracies have generally fostered conflict, economic stagnation, or kleptocracy, as evidenced in multiple academic studies, including the work of the Nobel Prize-winning economist Daron Acemoglu, democratic institutions reliably yield economic growth. 

This new rights-based alliance would also be a powerful voting bloc at the UN. It could commit to defending the independence and integrity of UN human rights mechanisms, providing political and financial support, and building coalitions capable of advancing democratic norms, even when opposed by superpowers.

Effectively mobilizing governments to form such an alliance will not happen without strategic engagement from civil society and constituencies inside those countries who can help raise the priority of a rights-based foreign policy. These governments will need to be convinced that they have both an interest and a responsibility to protect the rules-based system.

Projects of this nature are bubbling up. Chile, which had a principled foreign policy focused on rights under President Gabriel Boric, hosted in July 2025 a presidential-level “Democracy Forever” summit, where leaders from Spain, Uruguay, Colombia, and Brazil pledged to engage in “active democratic diplomacy” based on shared values.

The Hague Group, led by Malaysia, South Africa, and Colombia, formed in January 2025 in “defense of international law” and in solidarity with Palestinians. Over 70 countries from all regions signed a joint statement defending multilateralism at the UN. Earlier, in 2017, former Danish Prime Minister Anders Fogh Rasmussen set up the Alliance of Democracies Foundation to rally the dwindling ranks of democratic countries to “support each other against authoritarian pressures.”

Whatever its precise contours, an alliance of rights-respecting democracies would offer a hopeful counterpoint to the authoritarian trope of China’s and Russia’s leaders standing alongside North Korea’s Kim Jong Un, observing military hardware in a parade in Beijing’s Tiananmen Square in September. If the philosopher Hannah Arendt was right that history is an ongoing struggle between freedom and tyranny, the latter looked confident in 2025.

Yet, even in the worst of times, the idea of freedom and human rights is enduring. People power remains an engine for change. In the US, “No Kings” marches have drawn millions, protesters in Chicago, Minneapolis, Los Angeles, and around the country have stood up against the deployment of the National Guard and ICE abuses, and students are still organizing for Palestine on university campuses despite draconian crackdowns and visa revocations.

Buoyed by popular resistance, South Korean parliamentarians impeached their president to prevent him from grabbing power through martial law. Grassroots aid efforts by Sudan’s emergency response rooms, Hong Kong’s fire relief, Sri Lanka’s cyclone relief community kitchens, and Ukrainian mutual aid and solidarity collectives represent the best of this trend.

In 2025, Gen Z protests against corruption, inadequate public services, and poor governance in Nepal, Indonesia, and Morocco brought to the forefront the need for governments to listen to their youth and tackle corruption and inequality. But as the difficulties of restoring rights in Bangladesh after years under an authoritarian government illustrates, gains won through public mobilization can easily be lost unless democratic participation and free expression remain unassailable.