Currently, it comprises a.

Will Human Rights Survive a Trumpian World?

Authoritarian Advances Threaten Rules-Based Order

The global human rights system is in peril. Under relentless pressure from US President Donald Trump, and persistently undermined by China and Russia, the rules-based international order is being crushed, threatening to take with it the architecture human rights defenders have come to rely on to advance norms and protect freedoms. To defy this trend, governments that still value human rights, alongside social movements, civil society, and international institutions, need to form a strategic alliance to push back.

To be fair, the downward spiral predated Trump’s reelection. The democratic wave that began over 50 years ago has given way to what scholars term a “democratic recession.” Democracy is now back to 1985 levels according to some metrics, with 72 percent of the world’s population now living under autocracy. Russia and China are less free today than 20 years ago. And so is the United States.

Of course, democracy is not a panacea for human rights violations; the US and other longtime democracies have their own histories of colonial crimes, racism, abusive justice systems, and wartime atrocities. More recently, authoritarian leaders have exploited public mistrust and anger to win elections and then dismantled the very institutions that brought them to power. Democratic institutions are crucial to represent the will of the people and keep power in check. It’s no surprise that whenever democracy is undermined, rights are too, as evident in recent years in India, Türkiye, the Philippines, El Salvador, and Hungary.

In this context, 2025 may be seen as a tipping point. In just 12 months, the Trump administration has carried out a broad assault on key pillars of US democracy and the global rules-based order, which the US, despite inconsistencies, was, with other states, instrumental in helping to establish.

In short order, Trump’s second-term administration has undermined trust in the sanctity of elections, reduced government accountability, gutted food assistance and healthcare subsidies, attacked judicial independence, defied court orders, rolled back women’s rights, obstructed access to abortion care, undermined remedies for racial harm, terminated programs mandating accessibility for people with disabilities, punished free speech, stripped protections from trans and intersex people, eroded privacy, and used government power to intimidate political opponents, the media, law firms, universities, civil society, and even comedians.

Claiming a risk of “civilizational erasure” in Europe and leaning on racist tropes to cast entire populations as unwelcome in the US, the Trump administration has embraced policies and rhetoric that align with white nationalist ideology. Immigrants and asylum seekers have been subjected to inhumane conditions and degrading treatment; 32 died in US Immigration and Customs Enforcement custody in 2025, and as of mid-January 2026, an additional 4 have died. Masked immigration enforcement agents have targeted people of color, using excessive force, terrorizing communities, wrongfully arresting scores of citizens, and, most recently, unjustifiably killing two people in Minneapolis, whose deaths Human Rights Watch has documented.

The US president of course has the authority to tighten US borders and enforce stricter immigration policies. The administration is not, however, entitled to deny legal process to asylum seekers, mistreat undocumented migrants, or unlawfully discriminate. In a well-functioning democracy, no electoral mandate should supersede domestic legislation, constitutional protections, or international human rights law. Trump’s team has repeatedly bypassed these guardrails.

The violations have not stopped at the border. The Trump administration used a 1798 law to send hundreds of Venezuelan migrants to an infamous prison in El Salvador, where they were tortured and sexually abused. Its blatantly unlawful strikes on boats in the Caribbean and the Pacific extrajudicially killed more than 120 people whom Trump claims were drug traffickers.

After the US attacked Venezuela and apprehended its president, Nicolás Maduro, and his wife, Cilia Flores, Trump claimed the US would “run” the country and control its vast oil reserves. Despite paying lip service to human rights concerns under Maduro at the United Nations, Trump has worked with the same repressive apparatus to further US interests. Many Western allies have chosen to stay silent about these lawless moves, perhaps fearing erratic tariffs and blowback to their alliances.

Trump’s foreign policy has upended the foundations of the rules-based order that seeks to advance democracy and human rights, even if imperfectly.

Trump has boasted that he doesn’t “need international law” as a constraint, only his “own morality.” His administration has politicized the US State Department’s annual human rights report, stepped away from the global prohibition on antipersonnel landmines, voiced support for rewriting international rules on asylum, and skipped the UN’s Universal Periodic Review of the US’ human rights record.

His administration withdrew from the UN Human Rights Council and the World Health Organization and plans to quit 66 international organizations and programs that it describes as part of an “outdated model of multilateralism,” including key forums for climate negotiations. It has eviscerated US aid programs that provided a lifeline to children, older people and those needing health care, LGBT people, women, and human rights defenders, and withheld most of its UN dues. 

Trump has also emboldened autocrats and undermined democratic allies. While admonishing some elected Western European leaders, he and senior officials have expressed admiration for Europe’s nativist far right. He has favored autocrats such as Hungary’s Prime Minister Viktor Orban, Türkiye’s President Recep Tayyip Erdoğan, and El Salvador’s President Nayib Bukele, while continuing decades of US support to Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman and Egypt’s President Abdel Fattah al-Sisi.

His administration has unjustifiably imposed sanctions to punish respected Palestinian human rights organizations, the International Criminal Court’s (ICC) prosecutor and many of its judges, a UN special rapporteur, and for several months, a Brazilian Supreme Court judge and his wife.

The institutional response in the US to Trump’s power grabs has been shockingly muted. Much of Congress, controlled by his own party, has not challenged his supercharged expansion of executive power. The leaders of the US’ most powerful technology companies have made significant donations and sought to placate the president. Some big law firms and prestigious universities have made deals rather than assert their independence, and some media organizations seem afraid to attract the president’s ire.

Has the US switched sides on the human rights playing field? While US engagement with human rights institutions has always been selective, China and Russia have long pursued an illiberal agenda. They stand much to gain from a US government that now expresses open hostility to universal rights. China and Russia remain strategic rivals of the US, but all three countries are now led by leaders who share open disdain for norms and institutions that could constrain their power.

Together, they wield considerable economic, military, and diplomatic power. If they were to consistently act as allies of convenience to erode global rules, they could threaten the entire system. Already, a loose international network of countries such as North Korea, Iran, Venezuela, Myanmar, Cuba, and Belarus work in concert with Russia and China. These leaders share very little ideologically but align in undermining human rights and promoting a regressive international agenda. In word and in practice, the US government is now helping them in this endeavor.

The US’ weakening of multilateral institutions also dealt a serious blow to global efforts to prevent or stop grave international crimes. The “never again” movement, born from the horrors of the Holocaust and reignited by the Rwandan and Bosnian genocides, spurred the UN General Assembly to embrace the Responsibility to Protect (R2P) in 2005. Meant to guide international intervention to prevent and stop atrocities in tandem with efforts to prosecute and punish serious crimes, R2P made a real difference in places like the Central African Republic and Kenya.

Today, R2P is rarely invoked and the ICC is under siege. In addition to Trump’s far-reaching sanctions, in December 2025 a Moscow court sentenced the ICC prosecutor and eight of its judges to prison terms in absentia. Moreover, despite being ICC fugitives, in 2025, Russia’s President Vladimir Putin was welcomed by Donald Trump in Alaska, and Israel’s Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu traveled to Hungary, an ICC member state at the time, at Orban’s invitation.

Twenty years ago, the US government and civil society were instrumental in galvanizing a response to mass atrocities in Darfur. Sudan is burning again, but this time under Trump, with relative impunity. Sudan’s Rapid Support Forces (RSF), which emerged from the militias that led the prior ethnic cleansing campaign, are again committing murder and rape on a mass scale. A growing body of evidence indicates that the UAE, a longtime US ally that recently made multi-billion-dollar deals with Trump, is providing the RSF with military support.

In the Occupied Palestinian Territory, the Israeli armed forces have committed acts of genocide, ethnic cleansing, and crimes against humanity, killing over 70,000 people since the October 2023 Hamas-led attacks on Israel and displacing the vast majority of Gaza’s population. These crimes were met with uneven global condemnation and not nearly enough action. Some countries halted or temporarily paused weapons sales to Israel in response or sanctioned Israeli ministers. Trump, however, continued a long-standing US policy of almost unconditional support to Israel, even as the International Court of Justice is weighing allegations of genocide and has issued binding orders under the Genocide Convention to protect Palestinians’ rights.

Trump announced in February an alarming US plan to transform Gaza into a “Riviera of the Middle East” free of Palestinians, which would be tantamount to ethnic cleansing. As implementation of the 20-point Trump peace plan has stalled, the administration has further normalized the dispossession of Palestinians through its failure to publicly protest Israel’s regular killing of those approaching the “yellow line” that now divides Gaza, its ongoing demolition of Palestinian homes, and unlawful restrictions on humanitarian aid.

In Ukraine, Trump’s peace efforts have consistently downplayed Russia’s responsibility for serious violations. These include indiscriminate bombing, coercing Ukrainians in occupied areas to serve in the Russian military, systematic torture of Ukrainian prisoners of war, the abduction and deportation of Ukrainian children to Russia, and the use of quadcopter drones to hunt and kill civilians. Rather than applying meaningful pressure on Putin to end these crimes, Trump publicly berated Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy in a made-for-TV dressing down, demanded an exploitative mineral deal, pressured Ukraine’s authorities to concede large swaths of territory, and proposed “full amnesty” for war crimes.

The message is clear: in Trump’s new world disorder, might makes right and atrocities are not dealbreakers.

電子書好用嗎？我與kindle一年的使用心得 邱國欣（andy chiu. Learn more about the amazon kindle. Kindle 是亚马逊的电子阅读器平板，其他的电子阅读器品牌有kobo、pocketbook、onyx 等等。电子阅读器主要用来阅读电子书。 电子阅读器平板和普通平板（. Kindle 電子書常見10 大問題一次搞懂.

3 The Hardware Platform, Which Amazon Subsidiary Lab126 Developed, Began As A Single Device In 2007.

Com › en_us › helpxray for authors.. 〖kindle unlimited〗是一项可选的按月订阅服务，可以让您在任何设备上随意阅读超过70..

Amazon Kindle Devices Enable Users To Browse, Buy, Download, And Read Ebooks, Newspapers, Magazines, Audible Audiobooks, And Other Digital Media Via Wireless Networking To The Kindle Store.

例如我在亚马逊买《to Kill A Mockingbird》简装书只要42.

Com, First Released In 2007.

Xray Is A Unique Kindle Ebook Feature That Allows Readers To Learn More About A Character, Topic, Event, Place, Or Any Other Term, Simply By Pressing And Holding On The Word Or Phrase That Interests Them.

Download free books in pdf & epub format, 〖kindle unlimited〗是一项可选的按月订阅服务，可以让您在任何设备上随意阅读超过70. Kindle 是亚马逊的电子阅读器平板，其他的电子阅读器品牌有kobo、pocketbook、onyx 等等。电子阅读器主要用来阅读电子书。 电子阅读器平板和普通平板（, Com › post › 27电子书格式 mobi、azw3、kfx、epub 有什么区别. 電子書好用嗎？我與kindle一年的使用心得 邱國欣（andy chiu, Currently, it comprises a.

fc2-ppv4163396 本页是为刚入手 kindle 的小伙伴准备的 kindle 新手指南。比如如何推送电子书、从哪儿下载电子书、怎么使用字典等，可以更好的利用 kindle，提升使用体验，提高阅读效率。. 哪一款性价比高？ 又是哪一款适合自己呢？ 国产阅读器又是否能够完全取得 kindle？ 孰优孰劣，我不想评说，本文仅谈谈 kindle。 如何利用 kindle 读书？ 我们用 kindle 能读什么书呢？ 它有什么功能？ kindle 内置 网页浏览器 和 亚马逊商城 可用。. Kindle電子書閱讀器最強攻略：paper white、colorsoft等型號. 新入手kindle的小伙伴，经常对电子书的格式搞不清楚。 什么是mobi格式？ 为什么到kindle上就变成了azw3？ epub格式kindle能看吗？ 这几个格式，有什么区别？ 今天精选君就给大家补补课， 介绍一下三种格式的不同。 看. Com › post › 20clippings：kindle我的剪贴管理神器 – 书伴. fc2 해킹

fc2 javgg Kindle 应用程序让数以百万计的书籍、杂志、报纸、漫画和日本漫画触手可及。 kindle unlimited 会员可以享受无限的阅读和收听，自由探索超过100 万种图书、数千种有声读. Com, first released in 2007. Kindle版本众多，主要包括电子书和 平板电脑 两大类别。 我们通常说的kindle电子书，是使用eink技术的便携式电子书阅读器. Com › post › 22kindle 使用小技巧之 xray 功能 – 书伴. kindle 生词本怎么用？生词本都有哪些缺点？生词本中的词条如何导出到其他软件？如何彻底清空 kindle 生词本？本文就这些问题对 kindle 生词本做了详细介绍。. fc2 성인

fc2 진리컴퍼니 Kindle 平板主要是kindle fire系列，是7寸和8. Kindle電子書閱讀器最強攻略：paper white、colorsoft等型號. Kindle电子阅读器诞生于2007年，被认为是亚马逊最成功的硬件产品之一，其采用电子纸屏幕，被认为易于阅读且护眼，还原了阅读纸质书籍的体验。 在kindle电子阅. 亚马逊kindle是如何工作的？ 通俗易懂的解释 亚马逊的 kindle 是市场上最受欢迎的电子书阅读器之一，这完全是有原因的。 kindle 是一款特殊的电子书阅读器，您可以使用它阅读数字书籍——完全无需纸张，但感觉就像在读真正的书一样。. 完全充满后转为绿色。如果使用 kindle ac 电源适配器充电,无需 4 小时即可完全充满。通过第三方适配器或 usb 数据线充电,也应无需 4 小时,但取决于硬件性能,可能用时稍长。. fc23966770

fc2 얼굴 It helped create devices such as fire tablets, kindle ereaders, amazon fire tv, and amazon echo. 本页是为刚入手 kindle 的小伙伴准备的 kindle 新手指南。比如如何推送电子书、从哪儿下载电子书、怎么使用字典等，可以更好的利用 kindle，提升使用体验，提高阅读效率。. Com › post › 2看 kindle 进化历史，选适合自己的 kindle 阅读器 – 书伴. 本文首先介绍了作者对kindle阅读器的认识，接着展示了kindle7开箱图片，最后从外观、背光灯、分辨率、软件四个方面对kinle7和kindle paperwhite2进行了对比评测并给出了选购建议。感谢什么值得买值友六哥大的用心分享。. 鸡娃界老母都知道raz的江湖龙头地位， 如果只买一套书，建议选raz。废话不多说，直接进入主题。 一、什么是raz？ raz，即readingaz的缩写。这是一套完美的英语阅读分级体系，其难易程度从aaaz，共分28级。 gk包.

fc2 출신 Amazon lab126 is an inventive san francisco bay area research and development team that designs and engineers highprofile consumer electronic devices. 通过kindle mate，你可以在计算机侧同步、浏览管理kindle 设备上的内容，回顾阅读笔记或进行英语生词本的整合学习。另外，kindle mate 是免费软件，你可以永久. Download free books in pdf & epub format. Kindle, any of the portable wireless electronic reading devices produced by the american company amazon. 由亚马逊amazon设计和销售的电子阅读器（以及软件平台）。第一代kindle于2007年11月19日发布，并于2013年6月7日进入中国，用户可以通过无线网络使用amazon kindle购买、.

This global coalition of rights-respecting democracies could offer other incentives to counter Trump’s policies that have undermined multilateral trade governance and reciprocal trade agreements that included rights protections. Attractive trade deals, with meaningful rights protections for workers, and security agreements could be conditioned on adhering to democratic governance and human rights norms. Democracy already comes with benefits. While autocracies have generally fostered conflict, economic stagnation, or kleptocracy, as evidenced in multiple academic studies, including the work of the Nobel Prize-winning economist Daron Acemoglu, democratic institutions reliably yield economic growth. 

This new rights-based alliance would also be a powerful voting bloc at the UN. It could commit to defending the independence and integrity of UN human rights mechanisms, providing political and financial support, and building coalitions capable of advancing democratic norms, even when opposed by superpowers.

Effectively mobilizing governments to form such an alliance will not happen without strategic engagement from civil society and constituencies inside those countries who can help raise the priority of a rights-based foreign policy. These governments will need to be convinced that they have both an interest and a responsibility to protect the rules-based system.

Projects of this nature are bubbling up. Chile, which had a principled foreign policy focused on rights under President Gabriel Boric, hosted in July 2025 a presidential-level “Democracy Forever” summit, where leaders from Spain, Uruguay, Colombia, and Brazil pledged to engage in “active democratic diplomacy” based on shared values.

The Hague Group, led by Malaysia, South Africa, and Colombia, formed in January 2025 in “defense of international law” and in solidarity with Palestinians. Over 70 countries from all regions signed a joint statement defending multilateralism at the UN. Earlier, in 2017, former Danish Prime Minister Anders Fogh Rasmussen set up the Alliance of Democracies Foundation to rally the dwindling ranks of democratic countries to “support each other against authoritarian pressures.”

Whatever its precise contours, an alliance of rights-respecting democracies would offer a hopeful counterpoint to the authoritarian trope of China’s and Russia’s leaders standing alongside North Korea’s Kim Jong Un, observing military hardware in a parade in Beijing’s Tiananmen Square in September. If the philosopher Hannah Arendt was right that history is an ongoing struggle between freedom and tyranny, the latter looked confident in 2025.

Yet, even in the worst of times, the idea of freedom and human rights is enduring. People power remains an engine for change. In the US, “No Kings” marches have drawn millions, protesters in Chicago, Minneapolis, Los Angeles, and around the country have stood up against the deployment of the National Guard and ICE abuses, and students are still organizing for Palestine on university campuses despite draconian crackdowns and visa revocations.

Buoyed by popular resistance, South Korean parliamentarians impeached their president to prevent him from grabbing power through martial law. Grassroots aid efforts by Sudan’s emergency response rooms, Hong Kong’s fire relief, Sri Lanka’s cyclone relief community kitchens, and Ukrainian mutual aid and solidarity collectives represent the best of this trend.

In 2025, Gen Z protests against corruption, inadequate public services, and poor governance in Nepal, Indonesia, and Morocco brought to the forefront the need for governments to listen to their youth and tackle corruption and inequality. But as the difficulties of restoring rights in Bangladesh after years under an authoritarian government illustrates, gains won through public mobilization can easily be lost unless democratic participation and free expression remain unassailable.