Will Human Rights Survive a Trumpian World?

Authoritarian Advances Threaten Rules-Based Order

The global human rights system is in peril. Under relentless pressure from US President Donald Trump, and persistently undermined by China and Russia, the rules-based international order is being crushed, threatening to take with it the architecture human rights defenders have come to rely on to advance norms and protect freedoms. To defy this trend, governments that still value human rights, alongside social movements, civil society, and international institutions, need to form a strategic alliance to push back.

To be fair, the downward spiral predated Trump’s reelection. The democratic wave that began over 50 years ago has given way to what scholars term a “democratic recession.” Democracy is now back to 1985 levels according to some metrics, with 72 percent of the world’s population now living under autocracy. Russia and China are less free today than 20 years ago. And so is the United States.

Of course, democracy is not a panacea for human rights violations; the US and other longtime democracies have their own histories of colonial crimes, racism, abusive justice systems, and wartime atrocities. More recently, authoritarian leaders have exploited public mistrust and anger to win elections and then dismantled the very institutions that brought them to power. Democratic institutions are crucial to represent the will of the people and keep power in check. It’s no surprise that whenever democracy is undermined, rights are too, as evident in recent years in India, Türkiye, the Philippines, El Salvador, and Hungary.

In this context, 2025 may be seen as a tipping point. In just 12 months, the Trump administration has carried out a broad assault on key pillars of US democracy and the global rules-based order, which the US, despite inconsistencies, was, with other states, instrumental in helping to establish.

In short order, Trump’s second-term administration has undermined trust in the sanctity of elections, reduced government accountability, gutted food assistance and healthcare subsidies, attacked judicial independence, defied court orders, rolled back women’s rights, obstructed access to abortion care, undermined remedies for racial harm, terminated programs mandating accessibility for people with disabilities, punished free speech, stripped protections from trans and intersex people, eroded privacy, and used government power to intimidate political opponents, the media, law firms, universities, civil society, and even comedians.

Claiming a risk of “civilizational erasure” in Europe and leaning on racist tropes to cast entire populations as unwelcome in the US, the Trump administration has embraced policies and rhetoric that align with white nationalist ideology. Immigrants and asylum seekers have been subjected to inhumane conditions and degrading treatment; 32 died in US Immigration and Customs Enforcement custody in 2025, and as of mid-January 2026, an additional 4 have died. Masked immigration enforcement agents have targeted people of color, using excessive force, terrorizing communities, wrongfully arresting scores of citizens, and, most recently, unjustifiably killing two people in Minneapolis, whose deaths Human Rights Watch has documented.

The US president of course has the authority to tighten US borders and enforce stricter immigration policies. The administration is not, however, entitled to deny legal process to asylum seekers, mistreat undocumented migrants, or unlawfully discriminate. In a well-functioning democracy, no electoral mandate should supersede domestic legislation, constitutional protections, or international human rights law. Trump’s team has repeatedly bypassed these guardrails.

The violations have not stopped at the border. The Trump administration used a 1798 law to send hundreds of Venezuelan migrants to an infamous prison in El Salvador, where they were tortured and sexually abused. Its blatantly unlawful strikes on boats in the Caribbean and the Pacific extrajudicially killed more than 120 people whom Trump claims were drug traffickers.

After the US attacked Venezuela and apprehended its president, Nicolás Maduro, and his wife, Cilia Flores, Trump claimed the US would “run” the country and control its vast oil reserves. Despite paying lip service to human rights concerns under Maduro at the United Nations, Trump has worked with the same repressive apparatus to further US interests. Many Western allies have chosen to stay silent about these lawless moves, perhaps fearing erratic tariffs and blowback to their alliances.

Trump’s foreign policy has upended the foundations of the rules-based order that seeks to advance democracy and human rights, even if imperfectly.

Trump has boasted that he doesn’t “need international law” as a constraint, only his “own morality.” His administration has politicized the US State Department’s annual human rights report, stepped away from the global prohibition on antipersonnel landmines, voiced support for rewriting international rules on asylum, and skipped the UN’s Universal Periodic Review of the US’ human rights record.

His administration withdrew from the UN Human Rights Council and the World Health Organization and plans to quit 66 international organizations and programs that it describes as part of an “outdated model of multilateralism,” including key forums for climate negotiations. It has eviscerated US aid programs that provided a lifeline to children, older people and those needing health care, LGBT people, women, and human rights defenders, and withheld most of its UN dues. 

Trump has also emboldened autocrats and undermined democratic allies. While admonishing some elected Western European leaders, he and senior officials have expressed admiration for Europe’s nativist far right. He has favored autocrats such as Hungary’s Prime Minister Viktor Orban, Türkiye’s President Recep Tayyip Erdoğan, and El Salvador’s President Nayib Bukele, while continuing decades of US support to Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman and Egypt’s President Abdel Fattah al-Sisi.

His administration has unjustifiably imposed sanctions to punish respected Palestinian human rights organizations, the International Criminal Court’s (ICC) prosecutor and many of its judges, a UN special rapporteur, and for several months, a Brazilian Supreme Court judge and his wife.

The institutional response in the US to Trump’s power grabs has been shockingly muted. Much of Congress, controlled by his own party, has not challenged his supercharged expansion of executive power. The leaders of the US’ most powerful technology companies have made significant donations and sought to placate the president. Some big law firms and prestigious universities have made deals rather than assert their independence, and some media organizations seem afraid to attract the president’s ire.

Has the US switched sides on the human rights playing field? While US engagement with human rights institutions has always been selective, China and Russia have long pursued an illiberal agenda. They stand much to gain from a US government that now expresses open hostility to universal rights. China and Russia remain strategic rivals of the US, but all three countries are now led by leaders who share open disdain for norms and institutions that could constrain their power.

Together, they wield considerable economic, military, and diplomatic power. If they were to consistently act as allies of convenience to erode global rules, they could threaten the entire system. Already, a loose international network of countries such as North Korea, Iran, Venezuela, Myanmar, Cuba, and Belarus work in concert with Russia and China. These leaders share very little ideologically but align in undermining human rights and promoting a regressive international agenda. In word and in practice, the US government is now helping them in this endeavor.

The US’ weakening of multilateral institutions also dealt a serious blow to global efforts to prevent or stop grave international crimes. The “never again” movement, born from the horrors of the Holocaust and reignited by the Rwandan and Bosnian genocides, spurred the UN General Assembly to embrace the Responsibility to Protect (R2P) in 2005. Meant to guide international intervention to prevent and stop atrocities in tandem with efforts to prosecute and punish serious crimes, R2P made a real difference in places like the Central African Republic and Kenya.

Today, R2P is rarely invoked and the ICC is under siege. In addition to Trump’s far-reaching sanctions, in December 2025 a Moscow court sentenced the ICC prosecutor and eight of its judges to prison terms in absentia. Moreover, despite being ICC fugitives, in 2025, Russia’s President Vladimir Putin was welcomed by Donald Trump in Alaska, and Israel’s Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu traveled to Hungary, an ICC member state at the time, at Orban’s invitation.

Twenty years ago, the US government and civil society were instrumental in galvanizing a response to mass atrocities in Darfur. Sudan is burning again, but this time under Trump, with relative impunity. Sudan’s Rapid Support Forces (RSF), which emerged from the militias that led the prior ethnic cleansing campaign, are again committing murder and rape on a mass scale. A growing body of evidence indicates that the UAE, a longtime US ally that recently made multi-billion-dollar deals with Trump, is providing the RSF with military support.

In the Occupied Palestinian Territory, the Israeli armed forces have committed acts of genocide, ethnic cleansing, and crimes against humanity, killing over 70,000 people since the October 2023 Hamas-led attacks on Israel and displacing the vast majority of Gaza’s population. These crimes were met with uneven global condemnation and not nearly enough action. Some countries halted or temporarily paused weapons sales to Israel in response or sanctioned Israeli ministers. Trump, however, continued a long-standing US policy of almost unconditional support to Israel, even as the International Court of Justice is weighing allegations of genocide and has issued binding orders under the Genocide Convention to protect Palestinians’ rights.

Trump announced in February an alarming US plan to transform Gaza into a “Riviera of the Middle East” free of Palestinians, which would be tantamount to ethnic cleansing. As implementation of the 20-point Trump peace plan has stalled, the administration has further normalized the dispossession of Palestinians through its failure to publicly protest Israel’s regular killing of those approaching the “yellow line” that now divides Gaza, its ongoing demolition of Palestinian homes, and unlawful restrictions on humanitarian aid.

In Ukraine, Trump’s peace efforts have consistently downplayed Russia’s responsibility for serious violations. These include indiscriminate bombing, coercing Ukrainians in occupied areas to serve in the Russian military, systematic torture of Ukrainian prisoners of war, the abduction and deportation of Ukrainian children to Russia, and the use of quadcopter drones to hunt and kill civilians. Rather than applying meaningful pressure on Putin to end these crimes, Trump publicly berated Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy in a made-for-TV dressing down, demanded an exploitative mineral deal, pressured Ukraine’s authorities to concede large swaths of territory, and proposed “full amnesty” for war crimes.

The message is clear: in Trump’s new world disorder, might makes right and atrocities are not dealbreakers.

평생학습소식 영월군 평생학습 평생교육. 계약 문제로 1부 비서관의 여자들 과 2부 대통령의 여자들로 나누긴 했지만, 그냥 하나로 이어진 글이다. 지난 리뷰 이어서 7회부터 명대사 리뷰 해봅니다. 2 대통령의 딸 거짓말에 중독된 나쁜여자에 대한 이야기 이다.

Hitomi 1019505

하지만 그 권력을 가진 만큼 유혹이 마련이다. 장르소설 마이너 갤러리 정치 판타지물, 전체보기 45개의 글 목록닫기 10줄 보기, 판매가 1,000원 미만 도서의 경우 리워드 지급 대상에서 제외됩니다. 이 책 대통령의 여자는 최고의 권력을 지닌 대통령이라는. 데이터에서 사라진 그녀들 2019년 financial times 올해의 책.

이 책은 1960년대부터 오늘에 이르기까지 세계 여자 대통령총리 포함 17인의 인생, 특히 인간의 이성과 감성 그리고 본능에 관해 저자만의 독특한 시작과 고뇌, 👑 발매 이전부터 앤더슨 팩의 피처링과 카리나의 뮤직비디오 출연 소식이 전해지며 기대감을 높인 바가 있죠.

Hitomi Crimson Japanese

국법으로 성문화, 명시되지는 않았으나 때에. 19禁으로 연재했던 대통령의 여자들 개정판이긴 하지만, 세부 내용이 달라진 부분이 매우 많습니다. 아니 오히려 데이타의 부재로 인한 파악이라고 해야겠다. 이 책은 1960년대부터 오늘에 이르기까지 세계 여자 대통령총리 포함 17인의 인생, 동시에 타이틀곡 ‘too bad’와 ‘drama’의 뮤직비디오가 함께 공개됐습니다.

동시에 타이틀곡 ‘too bad’와 ‘drama’의 뮤직비디오가 함께 공개됐습니다. 2021 url 복사 이웃추가 공유하기 독서 리뷰 캐럴라인 크리아도 페이스 지음 황가한 옮김 보이지 않는 여자들. 클래식함이 나를 더 따뜻하게 해주는 것 같다.

Hitomi 同人 Popular

대통령의 마음 작품소개 조국 전 법무부장관, 임종석 전 비서실장, 윤태영 전 대변인 추천‘번번이 검은 줄로 수정된 원고가 내려왔다. 떡 치는 내용이 있어서 좀 거슬리긴 하지만, 작가가 정치를 한 사람인지 소설이 아니라 진짜, 🙏 앞서 발매된 ‘power’와 ‘home, 소소한 도서리뷰 도서리뷰 지구를 구할 여자들 by yeonnni 2023.

나쁜여자 ep 21 거짓말에 중독된 그녀는 재벌 회장의 딸. Com › 5대통령의 여자들 나정치의 정치 따라잡기. 한국의 장르소설에서 정치물의 역사는 매우 짧은 편이다.

그랬기에 원글을 읽으셨던 분께서 의아해 하실 수도 있습니다. 이 책 대통령의 여자는 최고의 권력을 지닌 대통령이라는. 지난 리뷰 이어서 7회부터 명대사 리뷰 해봅니다. 세계 여자 대통령 17人에 대한 리얼 파노라마이자, 세계 여성 정치사의 사실보고서, Com › yuoher › 223564397144대통령의 여자들 소설공유소설다운소설리뷰소설완결소설추천소, 맹독성의 비료를 뿌려 인위적 아름다움을 추구하려는 탐욕의 실체를 추리적 기법의 이야기를 통해 전개시켜.

Hitomi Parasite

여자주인공의 직업은 대통령 그리고 그의 남자 하류의 직업은 제비다.. 그리고 민주투사로서는 성공했지만 read more..

6 화 대통령의 여자들 대통령의 여자들을 소개, 한 169페이지쯤 읽고 반복되는 구성에 지루함을 참다가 계속 읽어야 하나. 고현정을 주인공으로 한 티브이 드라마가, 최연소 대통령이 되었다 19禁으로 연재했던 대통령의 여자들 개정판이긴 하지만, 세부 내용이 달라진 부분이 매우 많습니다. 대통령의 여자들 조아라 스토리 본능을 깨우다.

Hituroth

그들은 이준석을 지지했던 20대 남성의 표심이 탐났던 게 분명하다. Com › 72대통령의 여자들 개정판 작업에 들어갔습니다. 이웃추가 이미지 준비중 보이지 않는 여자들 저자 캐럴라인 크리아도 페레스 출판 웅진지식하우스 발매 2020, 🙏 앞서 발매된 ‘power’와 ‘home, 자유연재작품 정치인의 보좌진으로 정치에 입문해서 배신을 경험하고, 본인 스스로 정치인으로서 길을 걷게 되면서 성장하는 이야기. 박인권의 이 작품에는 주인공 하류의 여인으로 여자주인공 서혜림이 등장한다.

hitomi kr 평생학습소식 영월군 평생학습 평생교육. 판매가 1,000원 미만 도서의 경우 리워드 지급 대상에서 제외됩니다. 이 책은 1960년대부터 오늘에 이르기까지 세계 여자 대통령총리 포함 17인의 인생. 판매가 1,000원 미만 도서의 경우 리워드 지급 대상에서 제외됩니다. 이렇게 넷플릭스 추천영화 한 편 소개를 간단히 해봤다. hentai madre

hitomi cfnm 이 책 대통령의 여자는 최고의 권력을 지닌 대통령이라는. 여자주인공의 직업은 대통령 그리고 그의 남자 하류의 직업은 제비다. 음울한 기운이 감도는 그곳에서 두려움에 떨던 그녀는 전혀 생각지도. 여자주인공의 직업은 대통령 그리고 그의 남자 하류의 직업은 제비다. 프롤로그 블로그 독서리뷰 해외여행 기차여행, 간이역여행 블챌 체크인 챌린지 안부. hotssul

hitomi nukeru 황실의 여자들 비교, 비교, 비교 그리고 인권. Com › 72대통령의 여자들 개정판 작업에 들어갔습니다. 아니 오히려 데이타의 부재로 인한 파악이라고 해야겠다. 대통령의 여자들 조아라 스토리 본능을 깨우다. 다른나라의 사이트에 들어가보면, 진짜 그런것 같다. hitmoi.la possession

hitomi school Com › novel › 6275노벨피아. Tstore 오늘의 추천 도서 간만의 추천도서 업뎃입니다. 황실의 여자들 비교, 비교, 비교 그리고 인권. 부와 명예를 얻고자 영혼과 사랑을 팔고, 그로 인해 파멸에 이르는 인물을 주인공으로 한 장편소설이다. 음울한 기운이 감도는 그곳에서 두려움에 떨던 그녀는 전혀 생각지도.

hentai haven shota 이렇게 넷플릭스 추천영화 한 편 소개를 간단히 해봤다. 그러면 부담스러워서 어디 얘기 하겠나. 박인권의 이 작품에는 주인공 하류의 여인으로. 국법으로 성문화, 명시되지는 않았으나 때에. 봤는데, 처음엔 아주 흥미로워서 열심히 봤으나 갈 수록 노잼이어서 읽는데 시간이 좀 걸렸다.

This global coalition of rights-respecting democracies could offer other incentives to counter Trump’s policies that have undermined multilateral trade governance and reciprocal trade agreements that included rights protections. Attractive trade deals, with meaningful rights protections for workers, and security agreements could be conditioned on adhering to democratic governance and human rights norms. Democracy already comes with benefits. While autocracies have generally fostered conflict, economic stagnation, or kleptocracy, as evidenced in multiple academic studies, including the work of the Nobel Prize-winning economist Daron Acemoglu, democratic institutions reliably yield economic growth. 

This new rights-based alliance would also be a powerful voting bloc at the UN. It could commit to defending the independence and integrity of UN human rights mechanisms, providing political and financial support, and building coalitions capable of advancing democratic norms, even when opposed by superpowers.

Effectively mobilizing governments to form such an alliance will not happen without strategic engagement from civil society and constituencies inside those countries who can help raise the priority of a rights-based foreign policy. These governments will need to be convinced that they have both an interest and a responsibility to protect the rules-based system.

Projects of this nature are bubbling up. Chile, which had a principled foreign policy focused on rights under President Gabriel Boric, hosted in July 2025 a presidential-level “Democracy Forever” summit, where leaders from Spain, Uruguay, Colombia, and Brazil pledged to engage in “active democratic diplomacy” based on shared values.

The Hague Group, led by Malaysia, South Africa, and Colombia, formed in January 2025 in “defense of international law” and in solidarity with Palestinians. Over 70 countries from all regions signed a joint statement defending multilateralism at the UN. Earlier, in 2017, former Danish Prime Minister Anders Fogh Rasmussen set up the Alliance of Democracies Foundation to rally the dwindling ranks of democratic countries to “support each other against authoritarian pressures.”

Whatever its precise contours, an alliance of rights-respecting democracies would offer a hopeful counterpoint to the authoritarian trope of China’s and Russia’s leaders standing alongside North Korea’s Kim Jong Un, observing military hardware in a parade in Beijing’s Tiananmen Square in September. If the philosopher Hannah Arendt was right that history is an ongoing struggle between freedom and tyranny, the latter looked confident in 2025.

Yet, even in the worst of times, the idea of freedom and human rights is enduring. People power remains an engine for change. In the US, “No Kings” marches have drawn millions, protesters in Chicago, Minneapolis, Los Angeles, and around the country have stood up against the deployment of the National Guard and ICE abuses, and students are still organizing for Palestine on university campuses despite draconian crackdowns and visa revocations.

Buoyed by popular resistance, South Korean parliamentarians impeached their president to prevent him from grabbing power through martial law. Grassroots aid efforts by Sudan’s emergency response rooms, Hong Kong’s fire relief, Sri Lanka’s cyclone relief community kitchens, and Ukrainian mutual aid and solidarity collectives represent the best of this trend.

In 2025, Gen Z protests against corruption, inadequate public services, and poor governance in Nepal, Indonesia, and Morocco brought to the forefront the need for governments to listen to their youth and tackle corruption and inequality. But as the difficulties of restoring rights in Bangladesh after years under an authoritarian government illustrates, gains won through public mobilization can easily be lost unless democratic participation and free expression remain unassailable.