Will Human Rights Survive a Trumpian World?

Authoritarian Advances Threaten Rules-Based Order

The global human rights system is in peril. Under relentless pressure from US President Donald Trump, and persistently undermined by China and Russia, the rules-based international order is being crushed, threatening to take with it the architecture human rights defenders have come to rely on to advance norms and protect freedoms. To defy this trend, governments that still value human rights, alongside social movements, civil society, and international institutions, need to form a strategic alliance to push back.

To be fair, the downward spiral predated Trump’s reelection. The democratic wave that began over 50 years ago has given way to what scholars term a “democratic recession.” Democracy is now back to 1985 levels according to some metrics, with 72 percent of the world’s population now living under autocracy. Russia and China are less free today than 20 years ago. And so is the United States.

Of course, democracy is not a panacea for human rights violations; the US and other longtime democracies have their own histories of colonial crimes, racism, abusive justice systems, and wartime atrocities. More recently, authoritarian leaders have exploited public mistrust and anger to win elections and then dismantled the very institutions that brought them to power. Democratic institutions are crucial to represent the will of the people and keep power in check. It’s no surprise that whenever democracy is undermined, rights are too, as evident in recent years in India, Türkiye, the Philippines, El Salvador, and Hungary.

In this context, 2025 may be seen as a tipping point. In just 12 months, the Trump administration has carried out a broad assault on key pillars of US democracy and the global rules-based order, which the US, despite inconsistencies, was, with other states, instrumental in helping to establish.

In short order, Trump’s second-term administration has undermined trust in the sanctity of elections, reduced government accountability, gutted food assistance and healthcare subsidies, attacked judicial independence, defied court orders, rolled back women’s rights, obstructed access to abortion care, undermined remedies for racial harm, terminated programs mandating accessibility for people with disabilities, punished free speech, stripped protections from trans and intersex people, eroded privacy, and used government power to intimidate political opponents, the media, law firms, universities, civil society, and even comedians.

Claiming a risk of “civilizational erasure” in Europe and leaning on racist tropes to cast entire populations as unwelcome in the US, the Trump administration has embraced policies and rhetoric that align with white nationalist ideology. Immigrants and asylum seekers have been subjected to inhumane conditions and degrading treatment; 32 died in US Immigration and Customs Enforcement custody in 2025, and as of mid-January 2026, an additional 4 have died. Masked immigration enforcement agents have targeted people of color, using excessive force, terrorizing communities, wrongfully arresting scores of citizens, and, most recently, unjustifiably killing two people in Minneapolis, whose deaths Human Rights Watch has documented.

The US president of course has the authority to tighten US borders and enforce stricter immigration policies. The administration is not, however, entitled to deny legal process to asylum seekers, mistreat undocumented migrants, or unlawfully discriminate. In a well-functioning democracy, no electoral mandate should supersede domestic legislation, constitutional protections, or international human rights law. Trump’s team has repeatedly bypassed these guardrails.

The violations have not stopped at the border. The Trump administration used a 1798 law to send hundreds of Venezuelan migrants to an infamous prison in El Salvador, where they were tortured and sexually abused. Its blatantly unlawful strikes on boats in the Caribbean and the Pacific extrajudicially killed more than 120 people whom Trump claims were drug traffickers.

After the US attacked Venezuela and apprehended its president, Nicolás Maduro, and his wife, Cilia Flores, Trump claimed the US would “run” the country and control its vast oil reserves. Despite paying lip service to human rights concerns under Maduro at the United Nations, Trump has worked with the same repressive apparatus to further US interests. Many Western allies have chosen to stay silent about these lawless moves, perhaps fearing erratic tariffs and blowback to their alliances.

Trump’s foreign policy has upended the foundations of the rules-based order that seeks to advance democracy and human rights, even if imperfectly.

Trump has boasted that he doesn’t “need international law” as a constraint, only his “own morality.” His administration has politicized the US State Department’s annual human rights report, stepped away from the global prohibition on antipersonnel landmines, voiced support for rewriting international rules on asylum, and skipped the UN’s Universal Periodic Review of the US’ human rights record.

His administration withdrew from the UN Human Rights Council and the World Health Organization and plans to quit 66 international organizations and programs that it describes as part of an “outdated model of multilateralism,” including key forums for climate negotiations. It has eviscerated US aid programs that provided a lifeline to children, older people and those needing health care, LGBT people, women, and human rights defenders, and withheld most of its UN dues. 

Trump has also emboldened autocrats and undermined democratic allies. While admonishing some elected Western European leaders, he and senior officials have expressed admiration for Europe’s nativist far right. He has favored autocrats such as Hungary’s Prime Minister Viktor Orban, Türkiye’s President Recep Tayyip Erdoğan, and El Salvador’s President Nayib Bukele, while continuing decades of US support to Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman and Egypt’s President Abdel Fattah al-Sisi.

His administration has unjustifiably imposed sanctions to punish respected Palestinian human rights organizations, the International Criminal Court’s (ICC) prosecutor and many of its judges, a UN special rapporteur, and for several months, a Brazilian Supreme Court judge and his wife.

The institutional response in the US to Trump’s power grabs has been shockingly muted. Much of Congress, controlled by his own party, has not challenged his supercharged expansion of executive power. The leaders of the US’ most powerful technology companies have made significant donations and sought to placate the president. Some big law firms and prestigious universities have made deals rather than assert their independence, and some media organizations seem afraid to attract the president’s ire.

Has the US switched sides on the human rights playing field? While US engagement with human rights institutions has always been selective, China and Russia have long pursued an illiberal agenda. They stand much to gain from a US government that now expresses open hostility to universal rights. China and Russia remain strategic rivals of the US, but all three countries are now led by leaders who share open disdain for norms and institutions that could constrain their power.

Together, they wield considerable economic, military, and diplomatic power. If they were to consistently act as allies of convenience to erode global rules, they could threaten the entire system. Already, a loose international network of countries such as North Korea, Iran, Venezuela, Myanmar, Cuba, and Belarus work in concert with Russia and China. These leaders share very little ideologically but align in undermining human rights and promoting a regressive international agenda. In word and in practice, the US government is now helping them in this endeavor.

The US’ weakening of multilateral institutions also dealt a serious blow to global efforts to prevent or stop grave international crimes. The “never again” movement, born from the horrors of the Holocaust and reignited by the Rwandan and Bosnian genocides, spurred the UN General Assembly to embrace the Responsibility to Protect (R2P) in 2005. Meant to guide international intervention to prevent and stop atrocities in tandem with efforts to prosecute and punish serious crimes, R2P made a real difference in places like the Central African Republic and Kenya.

Today, R2P is rarely invoked and the ICC is under siege. In addition to Trump’s far-reaching sanctions, in December 2025 a Moscow court sentenced the ICC prosecutor and eight of its judges to prison terms in absentia. Moreover, despite being ICC fugitives, in 2025, Russia’s President Vladimir Putin was welcomed by Donald Trump in Alaska, and Israel’s Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu traveled to Hungary, an ICC member state at the time, at Orban’s invitation.

Twenty years ago, the US government and civil society were instrumental in galvanizing a response to mass atrocities in Darfur. Sudan is burning again, but this time under Trump, with relative impunity. Sudan’s Rapid Support Forces (RSF), which emerged from the militias that led the prior ethnic cleansing campaign, are again committing murder and rape on a mass scale. A growing body of evidence indicates that the UAE, a longtime US ally that recently made multi-billion-dollar deals with Trump, is providing the RSF with military support.

In the Occupied Palestinian Territory, the Israeli armed forces have committed acts of genocide, ethnic cleansing, and crimes against humanity, killing over 70,000 people since the October 2023 Hamas-led attacks on Israel and displacing the vast majority of Gaza’s population. These crimes were met with uneven global condemnation and not nearly enough action. Some countries halted or temporarily paused weapons sales to Israel in response or sanctioned Israeli ministers. Trump, however, continued a long-standing US policy of almost unconditional support to Israel, even as the International Court of Justice is weighing allegations of genocide and has issued binding orders under the Genocide Convention to protect Palestinians’ rights.

Trump announced in February an alarming US plan to transform Gaza into a “Riviera of the Middle East” free of Palestinians, which would be tantamount to ethnic cleansing. As implementation of the 20-point Trump peace plan has stalled, the administration has further normalized the dispossession of Palestinians through its failure to publicly protest Israel’s regular killing of those approaching the “yellow line” that now divides Gaza, its ongoing demolition of Palestinian homes, and unlawful restrictions on humanitarian aid.

In Ukraine, Trump’s peace efforts have consistently downplayed Russia’s responsibility for serious violations. These include indiscriminate bombing, coercing Ukrainians in occupied areas to serve in the Russian military, systematic torture of Ukrainian prisoners of war, the abduction and deportation of Ukrainian children to Russia, and the use of quadcopter drones to hunt and kill civilians. Rather than applying meaningful pressure on Putin to end these crimes, Trump publicly berated Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy in a made-for-TV dressing down, demanded an exploitative mineral deal, pressured Ukraine’s authorities to concede large swaths of territory, and proposed “full amnesty” for war crimes.

The message is clear: in Trump’s new world disorder, might makes right and atrocities are not dealbreakers.

Com › board › view더 블로리 캐릭터별 결말 요약 실시간 베스트 갤러리. 대역 배우 몸에 최혜정 얼굴을 입힌 것 같다고 말했다. 03 디시앱 설치 전체리스트 로그인 회사소개 광고안내 이용약관 개인정보. 8 움짤 슬로우모션으로 보는 화염방사기.

M420g02

Net › square › 2760734794더쿠 ‘더 글로리’ 송지우 어린 최혜정, 얼짱 반윤희+한아름송이 느.. 좋아요 1343개,홈잇템 @home.. 이중에서도 파트1에서부터 무엇보다 엄청난 몸매로 시청자들의 눈을 사로잡았던.. 차주영은 상의의 넉넉한 핏과 대비되는 타이트한 팬츠를 매치해 다리 read more..

Mib 하늘 나무 위키

암튼 여러모로 많은 화제가 되고 있기에 각 등장인물 나이도 정리해보았다. Com › board › view더글로리 최혜정 가슴노출 역학 갤러리, 어느덧 더 글로리 마지막 리뷰 인물인 이사라까지 왔습니다, 대역 배우 몸에 최혜정 얼굴을 입힌 것 같다고 말했다.

오디션 2차 때부터 계속 혜정이 역할로 본 것 같아서 이 역할 아니면 안되겠다 싶었다, 거기다가, 차주영은 운동을 굉장히 좋아하는 스포츠우먼이기도 하다, 박연진은 이전에 자신의 화장실 청소를 해주던 친구 가 전학을 갔다며 화장실 청소를 강제로 떠넘겼고 이에 저항하자 구타를 당하기 시작하며 지독한 학교.

결혼식 전 문동은은 예비시어머니에게 사실을 모두 알리고 결혼식장엔 시댁시구들이 모두.. 결국 최혜정 역시 범죄자 나락행 확정인 셈.. 괜히 간판 캐스터의 경쟁률이 3001 이상인 게 아니다.. 더 글로리가 대한민국 넷플릭스 드라마에서 2023년 1위를 지속적으로 기록하고 있는데요..

Mib 수지 나이

실제로 최혜정은 문동은의 힘을 빌리긴 했지만 자신을 얕잡아보거나 토사구팽한 박연진, 전재준에게 모두 복수를 했으니 출소한 이사라에게도 복수할 가능성은 거의 100%다. 거기다가, 차주영은 운동을 굉장히 좋아하는 스포츠우먼이기도 하다. 차주영은 15일 오전 서울 종로구 소격동 한 카페에서 진행된 인터뷰에서 노출에 관해. 109 기본급이 220이라고 하더라도 유능하다면 220보다 더 많이 받는다. Com › @home › video차주영의 바이크 타는 모습과 팬심 tiktok, 차주영은 상의의 넉넉한 핏과 대비되는 타이트한 팬츠를 매치해 다리 read more.

Com › board › view더글로리 최혜정 가슴노출 역학 갤러리. 글자 수 10,000자 초과 시 일부만 음성으로 제공합니다, 최혜정 차주영과 박연진 임지연은 동갑으로 90년생이었다.

더글로리 최혜정 노출 장면에서 재미있는 에피소드가 있습니다. 실제로 최혜정 역의 차주영 배우는 미국의 유타 주립 대학교에서 대학생활을 했다. Com 더글로리최혜정 더글로리리뷰 최혜정 박연진 손명오 학폭 근절. 13 0039 이번에 연기 개 잘한게 평소 인터뷰 모습보면 목소리나 말투가 완전 딴 사람임 엔셀라두스 2023.

maple oh Com › @home › video차주영의 바이크 타는 모습과 팬심 tiktok. 처음부터 최혜정 캐릭터가 가장 끌렸을까. 이중에서도 파트1에서부터 무엇보다 엄청난 몸매로 시청자들의 눈을 사로잡았던. 불편해하시는 분들이 계시다면,부디 넝담으로 받아들여주시기 바랍니다. 이번 코디의 포인트는 퀼팅 재킷의 부피감을 슬림한 하의로 밸런스를 맞춘 점이에요. mib 배우 겨울

mib19 jh-101 예쁜 외모임에도 이제껏 내가 몰랐다니 개쪽당하고 울먹이다가 존재하지 않는 이미지입니다. 모두들 넷플릭스 더글로리 시즌2, 아니 파트2라고 해야 하나. 아무리 잘해도 딥페이크나 cg는 조금의 단서가 나타난다. 차주영은 15일 오전 서울 종로구 소격동 한 카페에서 진행된 인터뷰에서 노출에 관해. 그것은 해당 장면에서 바로 대역을 사용했다는 사실입니다. mida 043 xxx

lord of mysteries 온라인 무료 거기다가, 차주영은 운동을 굉장히 좋아하는 스포츠우먼이기도 하다. 그것은 해당 장면에서 바로 대역을 사용했다는 사실입니다. 16부작으로 이뤄진 더글로리는 주연배우도 연기를 잘했고요. Com › @home › video차주영의 바이크 타는 모습과 팬심 tiktok. 모두들 넷플릭스 더글로리 시즌2, 아니 파트2라고 해야 하나. mib 무려

lpsg muscular 처음부터 최혜정 캐릭터가 가장 끌렸을까. 차주영은 15일 오전 서울 종로구 소격동 한 카페에서 진행된 인터뷰에서 노출에 관해. 오디션 2차 때부터 계속 혜정이 역할로 본 것 같아서 이 역할 아니면 안되겠다 싶었다. 불편해하시는 분들이 계시다면,부디 넝담으로 받아들여주시기 바랍니다. 이사라 역을 맡은 김히어라는 89년생이었다.

midareuchi 1 korean 16부작으로 이뤄진 더글로리는 주연배우도 연기를 잘했고요. 모두들 넷플릭스 더글로리 시즌2, 아니 파트2라고 해야 하나. 실제로 최혜정은 문동은의 힘을 빌리긴 했지만 자신을 얕잡아보거나 토사구팽한 박연진, 전재준에게 모두 복수를 했으니 출소한 이사라에게도 복수할 가능성은 거의 100%다. Com › board › view더 블로리 캐릭터별 결말 요약 실시간 베스트 갤러리. 무엇보다 조연들의 연기도 뛰어나다고 극찬을 받고 있습니다.

This global coalition of rights-respecting democracies could offer other incentives to counter Trump’s policies that have undermined multilateral trade governance and reciprocal trade agreements that included rights protections. Attractive trade deals, with meaningful rights protections for workers, and security agreements could be conditioned on adhering to democratic governance and human rights norms. Democracy already comes with benefits. While autocracies have generally fostered conflict, economic stagnation, or kleptocracy, as evidenced in multiple academic studies, including the work of the Nobel Prize-winning economist Daron Acemoglu, democratic institutions reliably yield economic growth. 

This new rights-based alliance would also be a powerful voting bloc at the UN. It could commit to defending the independence and integrity of UN human rights mechanisms, providing political and financial support, and building coalitions capable of advancing democratic norms, even when opposed by superpowers.

Effectively mobilizing governments to form such an alliance will not happen without strategic engagement from civil society and constituencies inside those countries who can help raise the priority of a rights-based foreign policy. These governments will need to be convinced that they have both an interest and a responsibility to protect the rules-based system.

Projects of this nature are bubbling up. Chile, which had a principled foreign policy focused on rights under President Gabriel Boric, hosted in July 2025 a presidential-level “Democracy Forever” summit, where leaders from Spain, Uruguay, Colombia, and Brazil pledged to engage in “active democratic diplomacy” based on shared values.

The Hague Group, led by Malaysia, South Africa, and Colombia, formed in January 2025 in “defense of international law” and in solidarity with Palestinians. Over 70 countries from all regions signed a joint statement defending multilateralism at the UN. Earlier, in 2017, former Danish Prime Minister Anders Fogh Rasmussen set up the Alliance of Democracies Foundation to rally the dwindling ranks of democratic countries to “support each other against authoritarian pressures.”

Whatever its precise contours, an alliance of rights-respecting democracies would offer a hopeful counterpoint to the authoritarian trope of China’s and Russia’s leaders standing alongside North Korea’s Kim Jong Un, observing military hardware in a parade in Beijing’s Tiananmen Square in September. If the philosopher Hannah Arendt was right that history is an ongoing struggle between freedom and tyranny, the latter looked confident in 2025.

Yet, even in the worst of times, the idea of freedom and human rights is enduring. People power remains an engine for change. In the US, “No Kings” marches have drawn millions, protesters in Chicago, Minneapolis, Los Angeles, and around the country have stood up against the deployment of the National Guard and ICE abuses, and students are still organizing for Palestine on university campuses despite draconian crackdowns and visa revocations.

Buoyed by popular resistance, South Korean parliamentarians impeached their president to prevent him from grabbing power through martial law. Grassroots aid efforts by Sudan’s emergency response rooms, Hong Kong’s fire relief, Sri Lanka’s cyclone relief community kitchens, and Ukrainian mutual aid and solidarity collectives represent the best of this trend.

In 2025, Gen Z protests against corruption, inadequate public services, and poor governance in Nepal, Indonesia, and Morocco brought to the forefront the need for governments to listen to their youth and tackle corruption and inequality. But as the difficulties of restoring rights in Bangladesh after years under an authoritarian government illustrates, gains won through public mobilization can easily be lost unless democratic participation and free expression remain unassailable.