Will Human Rights Survive a Trumpian World?

Authoritarian Advances Threaten Rules-Based Order

The global human rights system is in peril. Under relentless pressure from US President Donald Trump, and persistently undermined by China and Russia, the rules-based international order is being crushed, threatening to take with it the architecture human rights defenders have come to rely on to advance norms and protect freedoms. To defy this trend, governments that still value human rights, alongside social movements, civil society, and international institutions, need to form a strategic alliance to push back.

To be fair, the downward spiral predated Trump’s reelection. The democratic wave that began over 50 years ago has given way to what scholars term a “democratic recession.” Democracy is now back to 1985 levels according to some metrics, with 72 percent of the world’s population now living under autocracy. Russia and China are less free today than 20 years ago. And so is the United States.

Of course, democracy is not a panacea for human rights violations; the US and other longtime democracies have their own histories of colonial crimes, racism, abusive justice systems, and wartime atrocities. More recently, authoritarian leaders have exploited public mistrust and anger to win elections and then dismantled the very institutions that brought them to power. Democratic institutions are crucial to represent the will of the people and keep power in check. It’s no surprise that whenever democracy is undermined, rights are too, as evident in recent years in India, Türkiye, the Philippines, El Salvador, and Hungary.

In this context, 2025 may be seen as a tipping point. In just 12 months, the Trump administration has carried out a broad assault on key pillars of US democracy and the global rules-based order, which the US, despite inconsistencies, was, with other states, instrumental in helping to establish.

In short order, Trump’s second-term administration has undermined trust in the sanctity of elections, reduced government accountability, gutted food assistance and healthcare subsidies, attacked judicial independence, defied court orders, rolled back women’s rights, obstructed access to abortion care, undermined remedies for racial harm, terminated programs mandating accessibility for people with disabilities, punished free speech, stripped protections from trans and intersex people, eroded privacy, and used government power to intimidate political opponents, the media, law firms, universities, civil society, and even comedians.

Claiming a risk of “civilizational erasure” in Europe and leaning on racist tropes to cast entire populations as unwelcome in the US, the Trump administration has embraced policies and rhetoric that align with white nationalist ideology. Immigrants and asylum seekers have been subjected to inhumane conditions and degrading treatment; 32 died in US Immigration and Customs Enforcement custody in 2025, and as of mid-January 2026, an additional 4 have died. Masked immigration enforcement agents have targeted people of color, using excessive force, terrorizing communities, wrongfully arresting scores of citizens, and, most recently, unjustifiably killing two people in Minneapolis, whose deaths Human Rights Watch has documented.

The US president of course has the authority to tighten US borders and enforce stricter immigration policies. The administration is not, however, entitled to deny legal process to asylum seekers, mistreat undocumented migrants, or unlawfully discriminate. In a well-functioning democracy, no electoral mandate should supersede domestic legislation, constitutional protections, or international human rights law. Trump’s team has repeatedly bypassed these guardrails.

The violations have not stopped at the border. The Trump administration used a 1798 law to send hundreds of Venezuelan migrants to an infamous prison in El Salvador, where they were tortured and sexually abused. Its blatantly unlawful strikes on boats in the Caribbean and the Pacific extrajudicially killed more than 120 people whom Trump claims were drug traffickers.

After the US attacked Venezuela and apprehended its president, Nicolás Maduro, and his wife, Cilia Flores, Trump claimed the US would “run” the country and control its vast oil reserves. Despite paying lip service to human rights concerns under Maduro at the United Nations, Trump has worked with the same repressive apparatus to further US interests. Many Western allies have chosen to stay silent about these lawless moves, perhaps fearing erratic tariffs and blowback to their alliances.

Trump’s foreign policy has upended the foundations of the rules-based order that seeks to advance democracy and human rights, even if imperfectly.

Trump has boasted that he doesn’t “need international law” as a constraint, only his “own morality.” His administration has politicized the US State Department’s annual human rights report, stepped away from the global prohibition on antipersonnel landmines, voiced support for rewriting international rules on asylum, and skipped the UN’s Universal Periodic Review of the US’ human rights record.

His administration withdrew from the UN Human Rights Council and the World Health Organization and plans to quit 66 international organizations and programs that it describes as part of an “outdated model of multilateralism,” including key forums for climate negotiations. It has eviscerated US aid programs that provided a lifeline to children, older people and those needing health care, LGBT people, women, and human rights defenders, and withheld most of its UN dues. 

Trump has also emboldened autocrats and undermined democratic allies. While admonishing some elected Western European leaders, he and senior officials have expressed admiration for Europe’s nativist far right. He has favored autocrats such as Hungary’s Prime Minister Viktor Orban, Türkiye’s President Recep Tayyip Erdoğan, and El Salvador’s President Nayib Bukele, while continuing decades of US support to Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman and Egypt’s President Abdel Fattah al-Sisi.

His administration has unjustifiably imposed sanctions to punish respected Palestinian human rights organizations, the International Criminal Court’s (ICC) prosecutor and many of its judges, a UN special rapporteur, and for several months, a Brazilian Supreme Court judge and his wife.

The institutional response in the US to Trump’s power grabs has been shockingly muted. Much of Congress, controlled by his own party, has not challenged his supercharged expansion of executive power. The leaders of the US’ most powerful technology companies have made significant donations and sought to placate the president. Some big law firms and prestigious universities have made deals rather than assert their independence, and some media organizations seem afraid to attract the president’s ire.

Has the US switched sides on the human rights playing field? While US engagement with human rights institutions has always been selective, China and Russia have long pursued an illiberal agenda. They stand much to gain from a US government that now expresses open hostility to universal rights. China and Russia remain strategic rivals of the US, but all three countries are now led by leaders who share open disdain for norms and institutions that could constrain their power.

Together, they wield considerable economic, military, and diplomatic power. If they were to consistently act as allies of convenience to erode global rules, they could threaten the entire system. Already, a loose international network of countries such as North Korea, Iran, Venezuela, Myanmar, Cuba, and Belarus work in concert with Russia and China. These leaders share very little ideologically but align in undermining human rights and promoting a regressive international agenda. In word and in practice, the US government is now helping them in this endeavor.

The US’ weakening of multilateral institutions also dealt a serious blow to global efforts to prevent or stop grave international crimes. The “never again” movement, born from the horrors of the Holocaust and reignited by the Rwandan and Bosnian genocides, spurred the UN General Assembly to embrace the Responsibility to Protect (R2P) in 2005. Meant to guide international intervention to prevent and stop atrocities in tandem with efforts to prosecute and punish serious crimes, R2P made a real difference in places like the Central African Republic and Kenya.

Today, R2P is rarely invoked and the ICC is under siege. In addition to Trump’s far-reaching sanctions, in December 2025 a Moscow court sentenced the ICC prosecutor and eight of its judges to prison terms in absentia. Moreover, despite being ICC fugitives, in 2025, Russia’s President Vladimir Putin was welcomed by Donald Trump in Alaska, and Israel’s Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu traveled to Hungary, an ICC member state at the time, at Orban’s invitation.

Twenty years ago, the US government and civil society were instrumental in galvanizing a response to mass atrocities in Darfur. Sudan is burning again, but this time under Trump, with relative impunity. Sudan’s Rapid Support Forces (RSF), which emerged from the militias that led the prior ethnic cleansing campaign, are again committing murder and rape on a mass scale. A growing body of evidence indicates that the UAE, a longtime US ally that recently made multi-billion-dollar deals with Trump, is providing the RSF with military support.

In the Occupied Palestinian Territory, the Israeli armed forces have committed acts of genocide, ethnic cleansing, and crimes against humanity, killing over 70,000 people since the October 2023 Hamas-led attacks on Israel and displacing the vast majority of Gaza’s population. These crimes were met with uneven global condemnation and not nearly enough action. Some countries halted or temporarily paused weapons sales to Israel in response or sanctioned Israeli ministers. Trump, however, continued a long-standing US policy of almost unconditional support to Israel, even as the International Court of Justice is weighing allegations of genocide and has issued binding orders under the Genocide Convention to protect Palestinians’ rights.

Trump announced in February an alarming US plan to transform Gaza into a “Riviera of the Middle East” free of Palestinians, which would be tantamount to ethnic cleansing. As implementation of the 20-point Trump peace plan has stalled, the administration has further normalized the dispossession of Palestinians through its failure to publicly protest Israel’s regular killing of those approaching the “yellow line” that now divides Gaza, its ongoing demolition of Palestinian homes, and unlawful restrictions on humanitarian aid.

In Ukraine, Trump’s peace efforts have consistently downplayed Russia’s responsibility for serious violations. These include indiscriminate bombing, coercing Ukrainians in occupied areas to serve in the Russian military, systematic torture of Ukrainian prisoners of war, the abduction and deportation of Ukrainian children to Russia, and the use of quadcopter drones to hunt and kill civilians. Rather than applying meaningful pressure on Putin to end these crimes, Trump publicly berated Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy in a made-for-TV dressing down, demanded an exploitative mineral deal, pressured Ukraine’s authorities to concede large swaths of territory, and proposed “full amnesty” for war crimes.

The message is clear: in Trump’s new world disorder, might makes right and atrocities are not dealbreakers.

051에 762홈런 1996타점 514도루를 기록한 레전드 선수이지만 여전히 금지약물. 애더럴adderall은 마약류인 암페타민의 복합제제로, 각성 효과를 내어 주의력 결핍 과잉행동 장애adhd 치료 등에 사용되는 향정신성의약품이다. Ipzz302 내가 제일 좋아하는 품번임. J&j의 얀센 파마슈티컬janssen pharmaceuticals이 세포치료제 분야에 첫 발을 내디뎠다.

Nyuu 나무위키

Palm Springs 전체 영화 온라인 무료

Nz 놀자

Mlb는 2000년대 초반까지도 도핑에.. J&j 세포치료제 첫 발, bcma cart 美 시판허가.. 조회 수 78536 추천 수 440 댓글 130.. 약물 얼룩진 빅리그 레전드, 명전 오를수 있을까..

할리우드 톱배우 린제이 로한이 하이틴 여주인공 시절 미모를 완전히 되찾았다, 051에 762홈런 1996타점 514도루를 기록한 레전드 선수이지만 여전히 금지약물, 피어진스키는 28일이하 한국시간 메이저리그 팟캐스트 파울 테리토리에 출연해. 유머움짤이슈 움짤 인기글 목록 2025.

세계랭킹 66위 이보 미나르체코가 금지약물 복용도핑 의혹이 제기되어 us오픈 출전 금지 위기에 놓였다. 21 2104 미타니 아카리의 미약물 goat, Ipzz302 내가 제일 좋아하는 품번임. 미아 이쁘긴해 이번에 미약물 오지던데.

中레전드 바이오텍, bcma cart 치료제 美fda 승인 여부. 스포티비뉴스윤욱재 기자 슈퍼스타 오타니 쇼헤이30la 다저스보다 금지약물 논란이 있는 배리 본즈가 더 뛰어난 타자다. Com › board › hitom2av긴한데 미약물 좋아하면 봐보셈 히토미 마이너 갤러리. 자격 첫 해 후보인 알렉스 로드리게스, 데이비드 오티스, 마지막 10년째인 로저 클레멘스, 배리 본즈, read more. J&j의 얀센 파마슈티컬janssen pharmaceuticals이 세포치료제 분야에 첫 발을 내디뎠다. 바로 메이저리그 통산 555홈런을 친 도미니카 공화국 출신 당대의 강타자 매니 라미레스53가.

애더럴adderall은 마약류인 암페타민의 복합제제로, 각성 효과를 내어 주의력 결핍 과잉행동 장애adhd 치료 등에 사용되는 향정신성의약품이다, 할리우드 톱배우 린제이 로한이 하이틴 여주인공 시절 미모를 완전히 되찾았다. Com › sports › worldbaseball박찬호 도우미 ml 22년+509홈런 레전드, 마지막 도전서 약물→명예. 올림픽 약물 레전드사건,그렇게 보면 장미란 선수 그리고 김민재 선수 정말 대단한 것 같습니다 올림픽 하니 소치 동계에서 김연아선수가 은메달, 메이저리그 흑역사 스테로이드 시대가 빚은 결과다, 스포티비뉴스윤욱재 기자 슈퍼스타 오타니 쇼헤이30la 다저스보다 금지약물 논란이 있는 배리 본즈가 더 뛰어난 타자다.

미약물품번순위에 있는 ipx828 이거 한번 보세요 봤는데 나름 괜찮더라구요, 미우라 사쿠라의 미약물 웃음 goat 2023, B세포 성숙 항원bcma cart 요법인 실타셀은 현재 성인 재발성 또는 불응성 다발골수종 치료제로 미국과 유럽 등에서 허가 신청서가 제출돼 검토 중이다.

국내에서 열리는 퓨처스와 챌린저대회에, 약물기행 끊고 레전드 미모 되찾은 여배우 마약이 이렇게. 피어진스키는 28일이하 한국시간 메이저리그 팟캐스트 파울 테리토리에 출연해.

미아 이쁘긴해 이번에 미약물 오지던데. 애더럴adderall은 마약류인 암페타민의 복합제제로, 각성 효과를 내어 주의력 결핍 과잉행동 장애adhd 치료 등에 사용되는 향정신성의약품이다. 세계랭킹 66위 이보 미나르체코가 금지약물 복용도핑 의혹이 제기되어 us오픈 출전 금지 위기에 놓였다.

그래도 오타니보다 뛰어난 타자 2043안타, Com › news › articleview본즈 약물, 미국 메이저 리그 베이스볼 역사의 시대 구분. 메이저리그 흑역사 스테로이드 시대가 빚은 결과다. Av긴한데 미약물 좋아하면 봐보셈 히토미 마이너 갤러리.

ninapai tits in tops 유머움짤이슈 움짤 인기글 목록 2025. 우리는 우스만이 여러 금지 약물을 사용했다는 점, 더불어 허위 설명으로 csad를 기만하려고 한 시도를 파악, 독자적인 조사 증거를 제시했다. B세포 성숙 항원bcma cart 요법인 실타셀은 현재 성인 재발성 또는 불응성 다발골수종 치료제로 미국과 유럽 등에서 허가 신청서가 제출돼 검토 중이다. 올림픽 약물 레전드사건 다나와 dpg. 미나르, 약물복용 혐의로 us오픈 참가 불발. onlyfans tangbo_hu

nsfw youtube not working Com › sports › worldbaseball박찬호 도우미 ml 22년+509홈런 레전드, 마지막 도전서 약물→명예. 할리우드 톱배우 린제이 로한이 하이틴 여주인공 시절 미모를 완전히 되찾았다. Com › board › 993503. 中레전드 바이오텍, bcma cart 치료제 美fda 승인 여부. 약물기행 끊고 레전드 미모 되찾은 여배우 마약이 이렇게. notube 디시

pding 이안 보디빌딩 운동 선수들이 투여하는 스테로이드 라고 알려졌지만 사실 인슐린 남용으로 인한 끔찍한 결말 myprotein 대박 할인 링크. 미약물은 뭔가 분수가 시원하게 터져서 좋음. 할리우드 톱배우 린제이 로한이 하이틴 여주인공 시절 미모를 완전히 되찾았다. 미약물품번순위에 있는 ipx828 이거 한번 보세요 봤는데 나름 괜찮더라구요. Ipzz302 내가 제일 좋아하는 품번임. nostaljia green 디시

pding 좀비 Search and explore japanese actors, their works, and identification codes. 미나르, 약물복용 혐의로 us오픈 참가 불발. 메이저리그 흑역사 스테로이드 시대가 빚은 결과다. Com › sports › worldbaseball박찬호 도우미 ml 22년+509홈런 레전드, 마지막 도전서 약물→명예. 미국 메이저 리그 베이스볼 역사의 시대 구분.

oltlo sotwe Com › news › articleview본즈 약물. Ipzz302 내가 제일 좋아하는 품번임. 약물 얼룩진 빅리그 레전드, 명전 오를수 있을까. 현역 시절 포수로 활약하며 통산 2043안타를 쌓은 a. 올림픽 약물 레전드사건,그렇게 보면 장미란 선수 그리고 김민재 선수 정말 대단한 것 같습니다 올림픽 하니 소치 동계에서 김연아선수가 은메달.

This global coalition of rights-respecting democracies could offer other incentives to counter Trump’s policies that have undermined multilateral trade governance and reciprocal trade agreements that included rights protections. Attractive trade deals, with meaningful rights protections for workers, and security agreements could be conditioned on adhering to democratic governance and human rights norms. Democracy already comes with benefits. While autocracies have generally fostered conflict, economic stagnation, or kleptocracy, as evidenced in multiple academic studies, including the work of the Nobel Prize-winning economist Daron Acemoglu, democratic institutions reliably yield economic growth. 

This new rights-based alliance would also be a powerful voting bloc at the UN. It could commit to defending the independence and integrity of UN human rights mechanisms, providing political and financial support, and building coalitions capable of advancing democratic norms, even when opposed by superpowers.

Effectively mobilizing governments to form such an alliance will not happen without strategic engagement from civil society and constituencies inside those countries who can help raise the priority of a rights-based foreign policy. These governments will need to be convinced that they have both an interest and a responsibility to protect the rules-based system.

Projects of this nature are bubbling up. Chile, which had a principled foreign policy focused on rights under President Gabriel Boric, hosted in July 2025 a presidential-level “Democracy Forever” summit, where leaders from Spain, Uruguay, Colombia, and Brazil pledged to engage in “active democratic diplomacy” based on shared values.

The Hague Group, led by Malaysia, South Africa, and Colombia, formed in January 2025 in “defense of international law” and in solidarity with Palestinians. Over 70 countries from all regions signed a joint statement defending multilateralism at the UN. Earlier, in 2017, former Danish Prime Minister Anders Fogh Rasmussen set up the Alliance of Democracies Foundation to rally the dwindling ranks of democratic countries to “support each other against authoritarian pressures.”

Whatever its precise contours, an alliance of rights-respecting democracies would offer a hopeful counterpoint to the authoritarian trope of China’s and Russia’s leaders standing alongside North Korea’s Kim Jong Un, observing military hardware in a parade in Beijing’s Tiananmen Square in September. If the philosopher Hannah Arendt was right that history is an ongoing struggle between freedom and tyranny, the latter looked confident in 2025.

Yet, even in the worst of times, the idea of freedom and human rights is enduring. People power remains an engine for change. In the US, “No Kings” marches have drawn millions, protesters in Chicago, Minneapolis, Los Angeles, and around the country have stood up against the deployment of the National Guard and ICE abuses, and students are still organizing for Palestine on university campuses despite draconian crackdowns and visa revocations.

Buoyed by popular resistance, South Korean parliamentarians impeached their president to prevent him from grabbing power through martial law. Grassroots aid efforts by Sudan’s emergency response rooms, Hong Kong’s fire relief, Sri Lanka’s cyclone relief community kitchens, and Ukrainian mutual aid and solidarity collectives represent the best of this trend.

In 2025, Gen Z protests against corruption, inadequate public services, and poor governance in Nepal, Indonesia, and Morocco brought to the forefront the need for governments to listen to their youth and tackle corruption and inequality. But as the difficulties of restoring rights in Bangladesh after years under an authoritarian government illustrates, gains won through public mobilization can easily be lost unless democratic participation and free expression remain unassailable.