Will Human Rights Survive a Trumpian World?

Authoritarian Advances Threaten Rules-Based Order

The global human rights system is in peril. Under relentless pressure from US President Donald Trump, and persistently undermined by China and Russia, the rules-based international order is being crushed, threatening to take with it the architecture human rights defenders have come to rely on to advance norms and protect freedoms. To defy this trend, governments that still value human rights, alongside social movements, civil society, and international institutions, need to form a strategic alliance to push back.

To be fair, the downward spiral predated Trump’s reelection. The democratic wave that began over 50 years ago has given way to what scholars term a “democratic recession.” Democracy is now back to 1985 levels according to some metrics, with 72 percent of the world’s population now living under autocracy. Russia and China are less free today than 20 years ago. And so is the United States.

Of course, democracy is not a panacea for human rights violations; the US and other longtime democracies have their own histories of colonial crimes, racism, abusive justice systems, and wartime atrocities. More recently, authoritarian leaders have exploited public mistrust and anger to win elections and then dismantled the very institutions that brought them to power. Democratic institutions are crucial to represent the will of the people and keep power in check. It’s no surprise that whenever democracy is undermined, rights are too, as evident in recent years in India, Türkiye, the Philippines, El Salvador, and Hungary.

In this context, 2025 may be seen as a tipping point. In just 12 months, the Trump administration has carried out a broad assault on key pillars of US democracy and the global rules-based order, which the US, despite inconsistencies, was, with other states, instrumental in helping to establish.

In short order, Trump’s second-term administration has undermined trust in the sanctity of elections, reduced government accountability, gutted food assistance and healthcare subsidies, attacked judicial independence, defied court orders, rolled back women’s rights, obstructed access to abortion care, undermined remedies for racial harm, terminated programs mandating accessibility for people with disabilities, punished free speech, stripped protections from trans and intersex people, eroded privacy, and used government power to intimidate political opponents, the media, law firms, universities, civil society, and even comedians.

Claiming a risk of “civilizational erasure” in Europe and leaning on racist tropes to cast entire populations as unwelcome in the US, the Trump administration has embraced policies and rhetoric that align with white nationalist ideology. Immigrants and asylum seekers have been subjected to inhumane conditions and degrading treatment; 32 died in US Immigration and Customs Enforcement custody in 2025, and as of mid-January 2026, an additional 4 have died. Masked immigration enforcement agents have targeted people of color, using excessive force, terrorizing communities, wrongfully arresting scores of citizens, and, most recently, unjustifiably killing two people in Minneapolis, whose deaths Human Rights Watch has documented.

The US president of course has the authority to tighten US borders and enforce stricter immigration policies. The administration is not, however, entitled to deny legal process to asylum seekers, mistreat undocumented migrants, or unlawfully discriminate. In a well-functioning democracy, no electoral mandate should supersede domestic legislation, constitutional protections, or international human rights law. Trump’s team has repeatedly bypassed these guardrails.

The violations have not stopped at the border. The Trump administration used a 1798 law to send hundreds of Venezuelan migrants to an infamous prison in El Salvador, where they were tortured and sexually abused. Its blatantly unlawful strikes on boats in the Caribbean and the Pacific extrajudicially killed more than 120 people whom Trump claims were drug traffickers.

After the US attacked Venezuela and apprehended its president, Nicolás Maduro, and his wife, Cilia Flores, Trump claimed the US would “run” the country and control its vast oil reserves. Despite paying lip service to human rights concerns under Maduro at the United Nations, Trump has worked with the same repressive apparatus to further US interests. Many Western allies have chosen to stay silent about these lawless moves, perhaps fearing erratic tariffs and blowback to their alliances.

Trump’s foreign policy has upended the foundations of the rules-based order that seeks to advance democracy and human rights, even if imperfectly.

Trump has boasted that he doesn’t “need international law” as a constraint, only his “own morality.” His administration has politicized the US State Department’s annual human rights report, stepped away from the global prohibition on antipersonnel landmines, voiced support for rewriting international rules on asylum, and skipped the UN’s Universal Periodic Review of the US’ human rights record.

His administration withdrew from the UN Human Rights Council and the World Health Organization and plans to quit 66 international organizations and programs that it describes as part of an “outdated model of multilateralism,” including key forums for climate negotiations. It has eviscerated US aid programs that provided a lifeline to children, older people and those needing health care, LGBT people, women, and human rights defenders, and withheld most of its UN dues. 

Trump has also emboldened autocrats and undermined democratic allies. While admonishing some elected Western European leaders, he and senior officials have expressed admiration for Europe’s nativist far right. He has favored autocrats such as Hungary’s Prime Minister Viktor Orban, Türkiye’s President Recep Tayyip Erdoğan, and El Salvador’s President Nayib Bukele, while continuing decades of US support to Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman and Egypt’s President Abdel Fattah al-Sisi.

His administration has unjustifiably imposed sanctions to punish respected Palestinian human rights organizations, the International Criminal Court’s (ICC) prosecutor and many of its judges, a UN special rapporteur, and for several months, a Brazilian Supreme Court judge and his wife.

The institutional response in the US to Trump’s power grabs has been shockingly muted. Much of Congress, controlled by his own party, has not challenged his supercharged expansion of executive power. The leaders of the US’ most powerful technology companies have made significant donations and sought to placate the president. Some big law firms and prestigious universities have made deals rather than assert their independence, and some media organizations seem afraid to attract the president’s ire.

Has the US switched sides on the human rights playing field? While US engagement with human rights institutions has always been selective, China and Russia have long pursued an illiberal agenda. They stand much to gain from a US government that now expresses open hostility to universal rights. China and Russia remain strategic rivals of the US, but all three countries are now led by leaders who share open disdain for norms and institutions that could constrain their power.

Together, they wield considerable economic, military, and diplomatic power. If they were to consistently act as allies of convenience to erode global rules, they could threaten the entire system. Already, a loose international network of countries such as North Korea, Iran, Venezuela, Myanmar, Cuba, and Belarus work in concert with Russia and China. These leaders share very little ideologically but align in undermining human rights and promoting a regressive international agenda. In word and in practice, the US government is now helping them in this endeavor.

The US’ weakening of multilateral institutions also dealt a serious blow to global efforts to prevent or stop grave international crimes. The “never again” movement, born from the horrors of the Holocaust and reignited by the Rwandan and Bosnian genocides, spurred the UN General Assembly to embrace the Responsibility to Protect (R2P) in 2005. Meant to guide international intervention to prevent and stop atrocities in tandem with efforts to prosecute and punish serious crimes, R2P made a real difference in places like the Central African Republic and Kenya.

Today, R2P is rarely invoked and the ICC is under siege. In addition to Trump’s far-reaching sanctions, in December 2025 a Moscow court sentenced the ICC prosecutor and eight of its judges to prison terms in absentia. Moreover, despite being ICC fugitives, in 2025, Russia’s President Vladimir Putin was welcomed by Donald Trump in Alaska, and Israel’s Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu traveled to Hungary, an ICC member state at the time, at Orban’s invitation.

Twenty years ago, the US government and civil society were instrumental in galvanizing a response to mass atrocities in Darfur. Sudan is burning again, but this time under Trump, with relative impunity. Sudan’s Rapid Support Forces (RSF), which emerged from the militias that led the prior ethnic cleansing campaign, are again committing murder and rape on a mass scale. A growing body of evidence indicates that the UAE, a longtime US ally that recently made multi-billion-dollar deals with Trump, is providing the RSF with military support.

In the Occupied Palestinian Territory, the Israeli armed forces have committed acts of genocide, ethnic cleansing, and crimes against humanity, killing over 70,000 people since the October 2023 Hamas-led attacks on Israel and displacing the vast majority of Gaza’s population. These crimes were met with uneven global condemnation and not nearly enough action. Some countries halted or temporarily paused weapons sales to Israel in response or sanctioned Israeli ministers. Trump, however, continued a long-standing US policy of almost unconditional support to Israel, even as the International Court of Justice is weighing allegations of genocide and has issued binding orders under the Genocide Convention to protect Palestinians’ rights.

Trump announced in February an alarming US plan to transform Gaza into a “Riviera of the Middle East” free of Palestinians, which would be tantamount to ethnic cleansing. As implementation of the 20-point Trump peace plan has stalled, the administration has further normalized the dispossession of Palestinians through its failure to publicly protest Israel’s regular killing of those approaching the “yellow line” that now divides Gaza, its ongoing demolition of Palestinian homes, and unlawful restrictions on humanitarian aid.

In Ukraine, Trump’s peace efforts have consistently downplayed Russia’s responsibility for serious violations. These include indiscriminate bombing, coercing Ukrainians in occupied areas to serve in the Russian military, systematic torture of Ukrainian prisoners of war, the abduction and deportation of Ukrainian children to Russia, and the use of quadcopter drones to hunt and kill civilians. Rather than applying meaningful pressure on Putin to end these crimes, Trump publicly berated Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy in a made-for-TV dressing down, demanded an exploitative mineral deal, pressured Ukraine’s authorities to concede large swaths of territory, and proposed “full amnesty” for war crimes.

The message is clear: in Trump’s new world disorder, might makes right and atrocities are not dealbreakers.

Days ago gmc가 프리미엄 중형 픽업 ‘캐니언 canyon’을 출시한다고 27일 밝혔다. 아시아 평균 신장을 고려하여 작은 사이즈 재고는 늘어나고, mtb, 하이브리드 등의 자전거 선택의 폭은 수요에 맞춰 줄어들게 되었습니다. ‘허머 ev아카디아캐니언’ 프리미엄 gmc 라인업 총출동 gmc 전동화 기술력이 응집된. 캐니언 팻바이크는 눈이나 모래, 기타 부드러운 지형을 돌파하려는 라이더를 위해 설계되었습니다.

길가의 후지이 43

Gov › grca › indexgrand canyon national park u.. 한국gm은 27일 경기도 김포시 한국타임즈항공에서 이러한 방향상 아래 대규모.. 캐니언 서비스 내 캐니언, 내 자전거..

글로벌 이코노믹 나무 위키

Gmc는 27일 프리미엄 중형 픽업 ‘캐니언’을 새롭게 선보이고 본격적인 국내 판매에 돌입한다. The grand canyona is a steepsided canyon carved by the colorado river in arizona, united states. 120년 노하우로 완성한 프리미엄 픽업, gmc 캐니언 국내 출시. 그랜드 캐니언을 관광 하려면 대부분의 관광객은 교통이 편리하며 관광시설이 잘 갖추어진 그랜드 캐니언 국립공원으로 간다. Days ago gmc 브랜드 데이 제너럴모터스의 프리미엄 suv픽업 브랜드인 gmc가 김포에 위치한 한국타임즈항, Shop mountain, road, triathlon, gravity, urban, fitness, accessories and get expert support buying online.

급똥 마키마

Gmc는 지난 1월 27일 gmc 브랜드 데이brand day를 통해 아카디아 드날리 얼티밋. 현재 후원하는 월드 투어급 프로팀은 2018년 uci 로드 월드 챔피언십의 우승자 알레한드로 발베르데의 소속팀인 모비스타와 매튜 반더폴의 소속팀인 알페신 팀. 구매 아시아에 특화된 재고로 운영됩니다.

그록 컴패니언 디시 Days ago 제너럴모터스의 프리미엄 suv픽업 브랜드 gmc가 ‘gmc brand day브랜드 데이’를 통해 한국 시장에서의 브랜드 비전과 프리미엄 전략을 공표하고, ‘허머 evhummer ev’와 ‘아카디아acadia’, ‘캐니언canyon’의 국내 출시를 알렸다. 이번 브랜드 데이는 gmc가 한국 시장에서 어떤 브랜드로 자리. 금일 방송 일정이 추가되어 안내 드립니다. Gmc 캐니언은 프리미엄 오프로드 트럭에 어울리는 강인한 외관 디자인을 갖췄다. 캐니언 팻바이크는 눈이나 모래, 기타 부드러운 지형을 돌파하려는 라이더를 위해 설계되었습니다. 그록 프롬포트

그록 보추 Days ago 제너럴모터스의 프리미엄 suv픽업 브랜드 gmc가 ‘gmc brand day브랜드 데이’를 통해 한국 시장에서의 브랜드 비전과 프리미엄 전략을 공표하고, ‘허머 evhummer ev’와 ‘아카디아acadia’, ‘캐니언canyon’의 국내 출시를 알렸다. 캐니언본명 김건부, 2001년 6월 18일 은 대한민국의 리그 오브 레전드 프로게이머로 포지션은 정글이다. 캐니언 드날리 단일 트림으로 출시되며 가격은 7685만원이다. 자전거 짱 좋고, 품질도 최고고, 가성비 진짜 미쳤고, 고객 서비스도 핵 좋음. 그랜드 캐니언 국립공원 grand canyon national park은 미국 애리조나주 에 있는 국립공원이다. 기무세딘 트위터 디시

그록 겨드랑이 Gmc 캐니언에 대한 자세한 정보는 gmc 공식 홈페이지를 통해 확인할 수 있다. Com › kokrworldclass road, gravel, & mountain bikes canyon kr. 1월 27일부터 3월 31일까지 gmc 공식 홈페이지에서 상담 이벤트를 진행하고 있는데요, 아카디아, 캐니언, 허머 ev에 대한 구매 상담을 신청하기만 해도 추첨을 통해 어마어마한 경품을 줍니다. 2026년형 gmc 캐니언 드날리가 국내에 정식 출시됐다. 대체로 붉은 색을 띠지만 지층 또는 지층군에서는 독특한 색들을 띠기도 한다. 그록 동영상 프롬프트 디시

그록 삭제 디시 아시아 평균 신장을 고려하여 작은 사이즈 재고는 늘어나고, mtb, 하이브리드 등의 자전거 선택의 폭은 수요에 맞춰 줄어들게 되었습니다. 신차 리뷰 지에므씨 아카디아 & 캐니언 장점이 없는게 장점. 대체로 붉은 색을 띠지만 지층 또는 지층군에서는 독특한 색들을 띠기도 한다. 1월 27일부터 3월 31일까지 gmc 공식 홈페이지에서 상담 이벤트를 진행하고 있는데요, 아카디아, 캐니언, 허머 ev에 대한 구매 상담을 신청하기만 해도 추첨을 통해 어마어마한 경품을 줍니다. 캐니언 드날리 단일 트림으로 출시되며 가격은 7685만원이다.

그록 ai 실사 디시 그랜드 캐니언 국립공원의 마서 포인트에서 본 봄철 소나기 구름 그랜드 캐니언 국립공원 약도 그랜드 캐니언을 관광 하려면 대부분의 관광객은 교통이 편리하며 관광시설이 잘 갖추어진 그랜드 캐니언 국립공원 으로 간다. Org › wiki › 그랜드_캐니언그랜드 캐니언 위키백과, 우리 모두의 백과사전. 국립공원의 사우스림 south rim남쪽 가장자리이 가장 교통이 편하며 가장. 단계별 설명에 따라 자전거 포장을 풀고 조립한 후 라이딩하세요. 국립공원의 사우스림 south rim남쪽 가장자리이 가장 교통이 편하며 가장.

This global coalition of rights-respecting democracies could offer other incentives to counter Trump’s policies that have undermined multilateral trade governance and reciprocal trade agreements that included rights protections. Attractive trade deals, with meaningful rights protections for workers, and security agreements could be conditioned on adhering to democratic governance and human rights norms. Democracy already comes with benefits. While autocracies have generally fostered conflict, economic stagnation, or kleptocracy, as evidenced in multiple academic studies, including the work of the Nobel Prize-winning economist Daron Acemoglu, democratic institutions reliably yield economic growth. 

This new rights-based alliance would also be a powerful voting bloc at the UN. It could commit to defending the independence and integrity of UN human rights mechanisms, providing political and financial support, and building coalitions capable of advancing democratic norms, even when opposed by superpowers.

Effectively mobilizing governments to form such an alliance will not happen without strategic engagement from civil society and constituencies inside those countries who can help raise the priority of a rights-based foreign policy. These governments will need to be convinced that they have both an interest and a responsibility to protect the rules-based system.

Projects of this nature are bubbling up. Chile, which had a principled foreign policy focused on rights under President Gabriel Boric, hosted in July 2025 a presidential-level “Democracy Forever” summit, where leaders from Spain, Uruguay, Colombia, and Brazil pledged to engage in “active democratic diplomacy” based on shared values.

The Hague Group, led by Malaysia, South Africa, and Colombia, formed in January 2025 in “defense of international law” and in solidarity with Palestinians. Over 70 countries from all regions signed a joint statement defending multilateralism at the UN. Earlier, in 2017, former Danish Prime Minister Anders Fogh Rasmussen set up the Alliance of Democracies Foundation to rally the dwindling ranks of democratic countries to “support each other against authoritarian pressures.”

Whatever its precise contours, an alliance of rights-respecting democracies would offer a hopeful counterpoint to the authoritarian trope of China’s and Russia’s leaders standing alongside North Korea’s Kim Jong Un, observing military hardware in a parade in Beijing’s Tiananmen Square in September. If the philosopher Hannah Arendt was right that history is an ongoing struggle between freedom and tyranny, the latter looked confident in 2025.

Yet, even in the worst of times, the idea of freedom and human rights is enduring. People power remains an engine for change. In the US, “No Kings” marches have drawn millions, protesters in Chicago, Minneapolis, Los Angeles, and around the country have stood up against the deployment of the National Guard and ICE abuses, and students are still organizing for Palestine on university campuses despite draconian crackdowns and visa revocations.

Buoyed by popular resistance, South Korean parliamentarians impeached their president to prevent him from grabbing power through martial law. Grassroots aid efforts by Sudan’s emergency response rooms, Hong Kong’s fire relief, Sri Lanka’s cyclone relief community kitchens, and Ukrainian mutual aid and solidarity collectives represent the best of this trend.

In 2025, Gen Z protests against corruption, inadequate public services, and poor governance in Nepal, Indonesia, and Morocco brought to the forefront the need for governments to listen to their youth and tackle corruption and inequality. But as the difficulties of restoring rights in Bangladesh after years under an authoritarian government illustrates, gains won through public mobilization can easily be lost unless democratic participation and free expression remain unassailable.