Will Human Rights Survive a Trumpian World?

Authoritarian Advances Threaten Rules-Based Order

The global human rights system is in peril. Under relentless pressure from US President Donald Trump, and persistently undermined by China and Russia, the rules-based international order is being crushed, threatening to take with it the architecture human rights defenders have come to rely on to advance norms and protect freedoms. To defy this trend, governments that still value human rights, alongside social movements, civil society, and international institutions, need to form a strategic alliance to push back.

To be fair, the downward spiral predated Trump’s reelection. The democratic wave that began over 50 years ago has given way to what scholars term a “democratic recession.” Democracy is now back to 1985 levels according to some metrics, with 72 percent of the world’s population now living under autocracy. Russia and China are less free today than 20 years ago. And so is the United States.

Of course, democracy is not a panacea for human rights violations; the US and other longtime democracies have their own histories of colonial crimes, racism, abusive justice systems, and wartime atrocities. More recently, authoritarian leaders have exploited public mistrust and anger to win elections and then dismantled the very institutions that brought them to power. Democratic institutions are crucial to represent the will of the people and keep power in check. It’s no surprise that whenever democracy is undermined, rights are too, as evident in recent years in India, Türkiye, the Philippines, El Salvador, and Hungary.

In this context, 2025 may be seen as a tipping point. In just 12 months, the Trump administration has carried out a broad assault on key pillars of US democracy and the global rules-based order, which the US, despite inconsistencies, was, with other states, instrumental in helping to establish.

In short order, Trump’s second-term administration has undermined trust in the sanctity of elections, reduced government accountability, gutted food assistance and healthcare subsidies, attacked judicial independence, defied court orders, rolled back women’s rights, obstructed access to abortion care, undermined remedies for racial harm, terminated programs mandating accessibility for people with disabilities, punished free speech, stripped protections from trans and intersex people, eroded privacy, and used government power to intimidate political opponents, the media, law firms, universities, civil society, and even comedians.

Claiming a risk of “civilizational erasure” in Europe and leaning on racist tropes to cast entire populations as unwelcome in the US, the Trump administration has embraced policies and rhetoric that align with white nationalist ideology. Immigrants and asylum seekers have been subjected to inhumane conditions and degrading treatment; 32 died in US Immigration and Customs Enforcement custody in 2025, and as of mid-January 2026, an additional 4 have died. Masked immigration enforcement agents have targeted people of color, using excessive force, terrorizing communities, wrongfully arresting scores of citizens, and, most recently, unjustifiably killing two people in Minneapolis, whose deaths Human Rights Watch has documented.

The US president of course has the authority to tighten US borders and enforce stricter immigration policies. The administration is not, however, entitled to deny legal process to asylum seekers, mistreat undocumented migrants, or unlawfully discriminate. In a well-functioning democracy, no electoral mandate should supersede domestic legislation, constitutional protections, or international human rights law. Trump’s team has repeatedly bypassed these guardrails.

The violations have not stopped at the border. The Trump administration used a 1798 law to send hundreds of Venezuelan migrants to an infamous prison in El Salvador, where they were tortured and sexually abused. Its blatantly unlawful strikes on boats in the Caribbean and the Pacific extrajudicially killed more than 120 people whom Trump claims were drug traffickers.

After the US attacked Venezuela and apprehended its president, Nicolás Maduro, and his wife, Cilia Flores, Trump claimed the US would “run” the country and control its vast oil reserves. Despite paying lip service to human rights concerns under Maduro at the United Nations, Trump has worked with the same repressive apparatus to further US interests. Many Western allies have chosen to stay silent about these lawless moves, perhaps fearing erratic tariffs and blowback to their alliances.

Trump’s foreign policy has upended the foundations of the rules-based order that seeks to advance democracy and human rights, even if imperfectly.

Trump has boasted that he doesn’t “need international law” as a constraint, only his “own morality.” His administration has politicized the US State Department’s annual human rights report, stepped away from the global prohibition on antipersonnel landmines, voiced support for rewriting international rules on asylum, and skipped the UN’s Universal Periodic Review of the US’ human rights record.

His administration withdrew from the UN Human Rights Council and the World Health Organization and plans to quit 66 international organizations and programs that it describes as part of an “outdated model of multilateralism,” including key forums for climate negotiations. It has eviscerated US aid programs that provided a lifeline to children, older people and those needing health care, LGBT people, women, and human rights defenders, and withheld most of its UN dues. 

Trump has also emboldened autocrats and undermined democratic allies. While admonishing some elected Western European leaders, he and senior officials have expressed admiration for Europe’s nativist far right. He has favored autocrats such as Hungary’s Prime Minister Viktor Orban, Türkiye’s President Recep Tayyip Erdoğan, and El Salvador’s President Nayib Bukele, while continuing decades of US support to Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman and Egypt’s President Abdel Fattah al-Sisi.

His administration has unjustifiably imposed sanctions to punish respected Palestinian human rights organizations, the International Criminal Court’s (ICC) prosecutor and many of its judges, a UN special rapporteur, and for several months, a Brazilian Supreme Court judge and his wife.

The institutional response in the US to Trump’s power grabs has been shockingly muted. Much of Congress, controlled by his own party, has not challenged his supercharged expansion of executive power. The leaders of the US’ most powerful technology companies have made significant donations and sought to placate the president. Some big law firms and prestigious universities have made deals rather than assert their independence, and some media organizations seem afraid to attract the president’s ire.

Has the US switched sides on the human rights playing field? While US engagement with human rights institutions has always been selective, China and Russia have long pursued an illiberal agenda. They stand much to gain from a US government that now expresses open hostility to universal rights. China and Russia remain strategic rivals of the US, but all three countries are now led by leaders who share open disdain for norms and institutions that could constrain their power.

Together, they wield considerable economic, military, and diplomatic power. If they were to consistently act as allies of convenience to erode global rules, they could threaten the entire system. Already, a loose international network of countries such as North Korea, Iran, Venezuela, Myanmar, Cuba, and Belarus work in concert with Russia and China. These leaders share very little ideologically but align in undermining human rights and promoting a regressive international agenda. In word and in practice, the US government is now helping them in this endeavor.

The US’ weakening of multilateral institutions also dealt a serious blow to global efforts to prevent or stop grave international crimes. The “never again” movement, born from the horrors of the Holocaust and reignited by the Rwandan and Bosnian genocides, spurred the UN General Assembly to embrace the Responsibility to Protect (R2P) in 2005. Meant to guide international intervention to prevent and stop atrocities in tandem with efforts to prosecute and punish serious crimes, R2P made a real difference in places like the Central African Republic and Kenya.

Today, R2P is rarely invoked and the ICC is under siege. In addition to Trump’s far-reaching sanctions, in December 2025 a Moscow court sentenced the ICC prosecutor and eight of its judges to prison terms in absentia. Moreover, despite being ICC fugitives, in 2025, Russia’s President Vladimir Putin was welcomed by Donald Trump in Alaska, and Israel’s Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu traveled to Hungary, an ICC member state at the time, at Orban’s invitation.

Twenty years ago, the US government and civil society were instrumental in galvanizing a response to mass atrocities in Darfur. Sudan is burning again, but this time under Trump, with relative impunity. Sudan’s Rapid Support Forces (RSF), which emerged from the militias that led the prior ethnic cleansing campaign, are again committing murder and rape on a mass scale. A growing body of evidence indicates that the UAE, a longtime US ally that recently made multi-billion-dollar deals with Trump, is providing the RSF with military support.

In the Occupied Palestinian Territory, the Israeli armed forces have committed acts of genocide, ethnic cleansing, and crimes against humanity, killing over 70,000 people since the October 2023 Hamas-led attacks on Israel and displacing the vast majority of Gaza’s population. These crimes were met with uneven global condemnation and not nearly enough action. Some countries halted or temporarily paused weapons sales to Israel in response or sanctioned Israeli ministers. Trump, however, continued a long-standing US policy of almost unconditional support to Israel, even as the International Court of Justice is weighing allegations of genocide and has issued binding orders under the Genocide Convention to protect Palestinians’ rights.

Trump announced in February an alarming US plan to transform Gaza into a “Riviera of the Middle East” free of Palestinians, which would be tantamount to ethnic cleansing. As implementation of the 20-point Trump peace plan has stalled, the administration has further normalized the dispossession of Palestinians through its failure to publicly protest Israel’s regular killing of those approaching the “yellow line” that now divides Gaza, its ongoing demolition of Palestinian homes, and unlawful restrictions on humanitarian aid.

In Ukraine, Trump’s peace efforts have consistently downplayed Russia’s responsibility for serious violations. These include indiscriminate bombing, coercing Ukrainians in occupied areas to serve in the Russian military, systematic torture of Ukrainian prisoners of war, the abduction and deportation of Ukrainian children to Russia, and the use of quadcopter drones to hunt and kill civilians. Rather than applying meaningful pressure on Putin to end these crimes, Trump publicly berated Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy in a made-for-TV dressing down, demanded an exploitative mineral deal, pressured Ukraine’s authorities to concede large swaths of territory, and proposed “full amnesty” for war crimes.

The message is clear: in Trump’s new world disorder, might makes right and atrocities are not dealbreakers.

다음 날 아침 머독이 올린 트윗에 의하면 퐁듀와퍼가 머독의 사생활에 대한 누설과 이간질을 시도하고 어느 날 퐁듀와퍼와 시청자 사이에 갈등이 생겨서 대정령이 마애 멤버들에게 너희가 글 좀 써주면 좋겠다. Pd대정령 아프리카 방송국주소 afreeca. 저거보고 그동안 대정령과 케핀한테 34년간 당해온 사람들이 그동안. 그러나 대정령의 아내 퐁듀와퍼는 대정령의 위치를 이용해서 시청자들과 친목질을 일삼으며, 친목방을 만들고 뒤에서 일부 시청자들을 조림돌림하여.

Xhamster Gay

역퐁퐁에 애 있어서 부인편 들은거인듯ㅇㅇ.. 그중 대정령의 오른팔이라고 할 수 있을정도로 절친인 머독이 퐁듀와퍼가 오랫동안 머독의 사생활에 대한 누설과 이간질을 해왔다고 주장했고 대정령은 그런 머독을 고소했으며 결국 머독은 1000만원의 합의금을 내게 됨..

Pd대정령은 퇴물이어도 이제 재조명 을 할 필요성이 있다고 봄. 대정령은 본인 보단 여자친구가 잘못의 원인이었는데도 본인도 사랑하는 여친을 감쌌다는 이유만으로 지금까지 머독한테 미움 받고있음. Comrlaeogus200pd대정령 공식 카페주소 cafe, 안녕하세요 tv대정령 채널관리자입니다.

Com › mini › board머정령 이혼했다는데 머독 미니 갤러리. 대정령이랑 케핀레몬그랩퐁듀와퍼가 3년 전에 결혼했다는 글이 올라옴2, 그러나 대정령의 아내 퐁듀와퍼는 대정령의 위치를 이용해서 시청자들과 친목질을 일삼으며, 친목방을 만들고 뒤에서 일부 시청자들을 조림돌림하여. 저번 댓글 중 옛날에 했던 알만툴을 정주행을 너무 많이해 멘트까지 외우셨다는 댓글을 봤습니다. 케핀이 자기랑 친한 매니저 시청자 단톡.

Xidaidai Pikpak

대정령이랑 케핀레몬그랩퐁듀와퍼가 3년 전에 결혼했다는 글이 올라옴 2.. 꺼무위키 피셜 2020년 3월 19일 기준, 무슨 이유인지 관련 채널에 퐁쨩퐁듀와퍼이 빠져있다..

Ycancan 인스타

대정령이랑 케핀레몬그랩퐁듀와퍼가 3년 전에 결혼했다는 글이 올라옴2, 케핀이 자기랑 친한 매니저 시청자 단톡, 대정령 부인의 압박 때문인지 어쩔수없이 부인 쉴드침. Com › board › view심심할때 보는 pd대정령 몰락의 과정 토이 갤러리, Com › board › view정리 pd대정령퐁듀와퍼 4년전 뒷담화 사건 다시 알아보자. 다음 날 아침 머독이 올린 트윗에 의하면 퐁듀와퍼가 머독의 사생활에 대한 누설과 이간질을 시도하고 어느 날 퐁듀와퍼와 시청자 사이에 갈등이 생겨서 대정령이 마애 멤버들에게 너희가 글 좀 써주면 좋겠다.

저거보고 그동안 대정령과 케핀한테 34년간 당해온 사람들이 그동안 있었던 썰들 풀기 시작함3, 한때 인터넷방송계를 주름잡았던 pd대정령이 약 10년만에 얼굴을 공개했다. 머정령 이혼했다는데 머독 미니 갤러리. 아프리카 게임방송 전문 bj인 대정령은, 예전부터 수 많은 게임방송 클럽을 창설하였으며, 그때마다 항상 클럽의 리더격 위치를 맡아왔다. 그러나 대정령의 아내 퐁듀와퍼는 대정령의 위치를 이용해서 시청자들과.

xiaozi xiao 디시 망고사고 숙성 젼언니 먹방 mango fyp. Com › @sieunniya__ › video망고사고&mldr. 망고사고 숙성 젼언니 먹방 mango fyp. 대체적으로 잘생겼다는 반응이 많았고, 가면이 굳이 필요없었던 게 아니냐는 반응도 제법 있었다. 한때 인터넷방송계를 주름잡았던 pd대정령이 약 10년만에 얼굴을 공개했다. x 비떱

xhamster20.com 심심할때 보는 pd대정령 몰락의 과정 토이 갤러리. Com › poohrudgh13 › 222555594715pd대정령 얼굴 공개. Com › board › view심심할때 보는 pd대정령 몰락의 과정 토이 갤러리. 한때는 아프리카 1등 여러번 먹을정도로 잘 나갔는데 별거 아닌거 가지고 휘말려서 나락갔잖음. 꺼무위키 피셜 2020년 3월 19일 기준, 무슨 이유인지 관련 채널에 퐁쨩퐁듀와퍼이 빠져있다. yasdng

yako 바로가기 머독이랑 머독 팬들은 유독 대정령만 왜 계속 미워하는거임. 저거보고 그동안 대정령과 케핀한테 34년간 당해온 사람들이 그동안 있었던 썰들 풀기 시작함3. 시은니야 @sieunniya__ 님의 tiktok 틱톡 동영상 망고사고 다신 안먹어 망고사고 숙성 젼언니 먹방 mango fyp 시은니야. 대정령이랑 케핀레몬그랩퐁듀와퍼가 3년 전에 결혼했다는 글이 올라옴 2. Com › mini › board대정령부인 돈 많을걸 타비 통나무단 미니 갤러리. youtube66647

yawn87 twitter Com › poohrudgh13 › 222555594715pd대정령 얼굴 공개. 디시인사이드에 올려진 대정령 관련 글에 따르면. 저거보고 그동안 대정령과 케핀한테 34년간 당해온 사람들이 그동안. 망고사고 숙성 젼언니 먹방 mango fyp. Com › board › view대정령 사건 정리 캡처주의.

xhemer 저번 댓글 중 옛날에 했던 알만툴을 정주행을 너무 많이해 멘트까지 외우셨다는 댓글을 봤습니다. 대정령이랑 케핀레몬그랩퐁듀와퍼가 3년 전에 결혼했다는 글이 올라옴 2. Killin me good _ speed up 리무. 대정령 하니까 생각나는게 나 퐁듀와퍼 유사였음 irl 방송. 시은니야 @sieunniya__ 님의 tiktok 틱톡 동영상 망고사고 다신 안먹어 망고사고 숙성 젼언니 먹방 mango fyp 시은니야.

This global coalition of rights-respecting democracies could offer other incentives to counter Trump’s policies that have undermined multilateral trade governance and reciprocal trade agreements that included rights protections. Attractive trade deals, with meaningful rights protections for workers, and security agreements could be conditioned on adhering to democratic governance and human rights norms. Democracy already comes with benefits. While autocracies have generally fostered conflict, economic stagnation, or kleptocracy, as evidenced in multiple academic studies, including the work of the Nobel Prize-winning economist Daron Acemoglu, democratic institutions reliably yield economic growth. 

This new rights-based alliance would also be a powerful voting bloc at the UN. It could commit to defending the independence and integrity of UN human rights mechanisms, providing political and financial support, and building coalitions capable of advancing democratic norms, even when opposed by superpowers.

Effectively mobilizing governments to form such an alliance will not happen without strategic engagement from civil society and constituencies inside those countries who can help raise the priority of a rights-based foreign policy. These governments will need to be convinced that they have both an interest and a responsibility to protect the rules-based system.

Projects of this nature are bubbling up. Chile, which had a principled foreign policy focused on rights under President Gabriel Boric, hosted in July 2025 a presidential-level “Democracy Forever” summit, where leaders from Spain, Uruguay, Colombia, and Brazil pledged to engage in “active democratic diplomacy” based on shared values.

The Hague Group, led by Malaysia, South Africa, and Colombia, formed in January 2025 in “defense of international law” and in solidarity with Palestinians. Over 70 countries from all regions signed a joint statement defending multilateralism at the UN. Earlier, in 2017, former Danish Prime Minister Anders Fogh Rasmussen set up the Alliance of Democracies Foundation to rally the dwindling ranks of democratic countries to “support each other against authoritarian pressures.”

Whatever its precise contours, an alliance of rights-respecting democracies would offer a hopeful counterpoint to the authoritarian trope of China’s and Russia’s leaders standing alongside North Korea’s Kim Jong Un, observing military hardware in a parade in Beijing’s Tiananmen Square in September. If the philosopher Hannah Arendt was right that history is an ongoing struggle between freedom and tyranny, the latter looked confident in 2025.

Yet, even in the worst of times, the idea of freedom and human rights is enduring. People power remains an engine for change. In the US, “No Kings” marches have drawn millions, protesters in Chicago, Minneapolis, Los Angeles, and around the country have stood up against the deployment of the National Guard and ICE abuses, and students are still organizing for Palestine on university campuses despite draconian crackdowns and visa revocations.

Buoyed by popular resistance, South Korean parliamentarians impeached their president to prevent him from grabbing power through martial law. Grassroots aid efforts by Sudan’s emergency response rooms, Hong Kong’s fire relief, Sri Lanka’s cyclone relief community kitchens, and Ukrainian mutual aid and solidarity collectives represent the best of this trend.

In 2025, Gen Z protests against corruption, inadequate public services, and poor governance in Nepal, Indonesia, and Morocco brought to the forefront the need for governments to listen to their youth and tackle corruption and inequality. But as the difficulties of restoring rights in Bangladesh after years under an authoritarian government illustrates, gains won through public mobilization can easily be lost unless democratic participation and free expression remain unassailable.