Off fromis_9 프로미스나인 3 fromis_9 22.

Will Human Rights Survive a Trumpian World?

Authoritarian Advances Threaten Rules-Based Order

The global human rights system is in peril. Under relentless pressure from US President Donald Trump, and persistently undermined by China and Russia, the rules-based international order is being crushed, threatening to take with it the architecture human rights defenders have come to rely on to advance norms and protect freedoms. To defy this trend, governments that still value human rights, alongside social movements, civil society, and international institutions, need to form a strategic alliance to push back.

To be fair, the downward spiral predated Trump’s reelection. The democratic wave that began over 50 years ago has given way to what scholars term a “democratic recession.” Democracy is now back to 1985 levels according to some metrics, with 72 percent of the world’s population now living under autocracy. Russia and China are less free today than 20 years ago. And so is the United States.

Of course, democracy is not a panacea for human rights violations; the US and other longtime democracies have their own histories of colonial crimes, racism, abusive justice systems, and wartime atrocities. More recently, authoritarian leaders have exploited public mistrust and anger to win elections and then dismantled the very institutions that brought them to power. Democratic institutions are crucial to represent the will of the people and keep power in check. It’s no surprise that whenever democracy is undermined, rights are too, as evident in recent years in India, Türkiye, the Philippines, El Salvador, and Hungary.

In this context, 2025 may be seen as a tipping point. In just 12 months, the Trump administration has carried out a broad assault on key pillars of US democracy and the global rules-based order, which the US, despite inconsistencies, was, with other states, instrumental in helping to establish.

In short order, Trump’s second-term administration has undermined trust in the sanctity of elections, reduced government accountability, gutted food assistance and healthcare subsidies, attacked judicial independence, defied court orders, rolled back women’s rights, obstructed access to abortion care, undermined remedies for racial harm, terminated programs mandating accessibility for people with disabilities, punished free speech, stripped protections from trans and intersex people, eroded privacy, and used government power to intimidate political opponents, the media, law firms, universities, civil society, and even comedians.

Claiming a risk of “civilizational erasure” in Europe and leaning on racist tropes to cast entire populations as unwelcome in the US, the Trump administration has embraced policies and rhetoric that align with white nationalist ideology. Immigrants and asylum seekers have been subjected to inhumane conditions and degrading treatment; 32 died in US Immigration and Customs Enforcement custody in 2025, and as of mid-January 2026, an additional 4 have died. Masked immigration enforcement agents have targeted people of color, using excessive force, terrorizing communities, wrongfully arresting scores of citizens, and, most recently, unjustifiably killing two people in Minneapolis, whose deaths Human Rights Watch has documented.

The US president of course has the authority to tighten US borders and enforce stricter immigration policies. The administration is not, however, entitled to deny legal process to asylum seekers, mistreat undocumented migrants, or unlawfully discriminate. In a well-functioning democracy, no electoral mandate should supersede domestic legislation, constitutional protections, or international human rights law. Trump’s team has repeatedly bypassed these guardrails.

The violations have not stopped at the border. The Trump administration used a 1798 law to send hundreds of Venezuelan migrants to an infamous prison in El Salvador, where they were tortured and sexually abused. Its blatantly unlawful strikes on boats in the Caribbean and the Pacific extrajudicially killed more than 120 people whom Trump claims were drug traffickers.

After the US attacked Venezuela and apprehended its president, Nicolás Maduro, and his wife, Cilia Flores, Trump claimed the US would “run” the country and control its vast oil reserves. Despite paying lip service to human rights concerns under Maduro at the United Nations, Trump has worked with the same repressive apparatus to further US interests. Many Western allies have chosen to stay silent about these lawless moves, perhaps fearing erratic tariffs and blowback to their alliances.

Trump’s foreign policy has upended the foundations of the rules-based order that seeks to advance democracy and human rights, even if imperfectly.

Trump has boasted that he doesn’t “need international law” as a constraint, only his “own morality.” His administration has politicized the US State Department’s annual human rights report, stepped away from the global prohibition on antipersonnel landmines, voiced support for rewriting international rules on asylum, and skipped the UN’s Universal Periodic Review of the US’ human rights record.

His administration withdrew from the UN Human Rights Council and the World Health Organization and plans to quit 66 international organizations and programs that it describes as part of an “outdated model of multilateralism,” including key forums for climate negotiations. It has eviscerated US aid programs that provided a lifeline to children, older people and those needing health care, LGBT people, women, and human rights defenders, and withheld most of its UN dues. 

Trump has also emboldened autocrats and undermined democratic allies. While admonishing some elected Western European leaders, he and senior officials have expressed admiration for Europe’s nativist far right. He has favored autocrats such as Hungary’s Prime Minister Viktor Orban, Türkiye’s President Recep Tayyip Erdoğan, and El Salvador’s President Nayib Bukele, while continuing decades of US support to Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman and Egypt’s President Abdel Fattah al-Sisi.

His administration has unjustifiably imposed sanctions to punish respected Palestinian human rights organizations, the International Criminal Court’s (ICC) prosecutor and many of its judges, a UN special rapporteur, and for several months, a Brazilian Supreme Court judge and his wife.

The institutional response in the US to Trump’s power grabs has been shockingly muted. Much of Congress, controlled by his own party, has not challenged his supercharged expansion of executive power. The leaders of the US’ most powerful technology companies have made significant donations and sought to placate the president. Some big law firms and prestigious universities have made deals rather than assert their independence, and some media organizations seem afraid to attract the president’s ire.

Has the US switched sides on the human rights playing field? While US engagement with human rights institutions has always been selective, China and Russia have long pursued an illiberal agenda. They stand much to gain from a US government that now expresses open hostility to universal rights. China and Russia remain strategic rivals of the US, but all three countries are now led by leaders who share open disdain for norms and institutions that could constrain their power.

Together, they wield considerable economic, military, and diplomatic power. If they were to consistently act as allies of convenience to erode global rules, they could threaten the entire system. Already, a loose international network of countries such as North Korea, Iran, Venezuela, Myanmar, Cuba, and Belarus work in concert with Russia and China. These leaders share very little ideologically but align in undermining human rights and promoting a regressive international agenda. In word and in practice, the US government is now helping them in this endeavor.

The US’ weakening of multilateral institutions also dealt a serious blow to global efforts to prevent or stop grave international crimes. The “never again” movement, born from the horrors of the Holocaust and reignited by the Rwandan and Bosnian genocides, spurred the UN General Assembly to embrace the Responsibility to Protect (R2P) in 2005. Meant to guide international intervention to prevent and stop atrocities in tandem with efforts to prosecute and punish serious crimes, R2P made a real difference in places like the Central African Republic and Kenya.

Today, R2P is rarely invoked and the ICC is under siege. In addition to Trump’s far-reaching sanctions, in December 2025 a Moscow court sentenced the ICC prosecutor and eight of its judges to prison terms in absentia. Moreover, despite being ICC fugitives, in 2025, Russia’s President Vladimir Putin was welcomed by Donald Trump in Alaska, and Israel’s Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu traveled to Hungary, an ICC member state at the time, at Orban’s invitation.

Twenty years ago, the US government and civil society were instrumental in galvanizing a response to mass atrocities in Darfur. Sudan is burning again, but this time under Trump, with relative impunity. Sudan’s Rapid Support Forces (RSF), which emerged from the militias that led the prior ethnic cleansing campaign, are again committing murder and rape on a mass scale. A growing body of evidence indicates that the UAE, a longtime US ally that recently made multi-billion-dollar deals with Trump, is providing the RSF with military support.

In the Occupied Palestinian Territory, the Israeli armed forces have committed acts of genocide, ethnic cleansing, and crimes against humanity, killing over 70,000 people since the October 2023 Hamas-led attacks on Israel and displacing the vast majority of Gaza’s population. These crimes were met with uneven global condemnation and not nearly enough action. Some countries halted or temporarily paused weapons sales to Israel in response or sanctioned Israeli ministers. Trump, however, continued a long-standing US policy of almost unconditional support to Israel, even as the International Court of Justice is weighing allegations of genocide and has issued binding orders under the Genocide Convention to protect Palestinians’ rights.

Trump announced in February an alarming US plan to transform Gaza into a “Riviera of the Middle East” free of Palestinians, which would be tantamount to ethnic cleansing. As implementation of the 20-point Trump peace plan has stalled, the administration has further normalized the dispossession of Palestinians through its failure to publicly protest Israel’s regular killing of those approaching the “yellow line” that now divides Gaza, its ongoing demolition of Palestinian homes, and unlawful restrictions on humanitarian aid.

In Ukraine, Trump’s peace efforts have consistently downplayed Russia’s responsibility for serious violations. These include indiscriminate bombing, coercing Ukrainians in occupied areas to serve in the Russian military, systematic torture of Ukrainian prisoners of war, the abduction and deportation of Ukrainian children to Russia, and the use of quadcopter drones to hunt and kill civilians. Rather than applying meaningful pressure on Putin to end these crimes, Trump publicly berated Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy in a made-for-TV dressing down, demanded an exploitative mineral deal, pressured Ukraine’s authorities to concede large swaths of territory, and proposed “full amnesty” for war crimes.

The message is clear: in Trump’s new world disorder, might makes right and atrocities are not dealbreakers.

태연만난 강훈 댓글 일례로 모사에서 전개했던 퍼플 칼라의 휴대전화는 걸레 빤물 같다는 혹평을. 화장품과 향수를 소개하는 현장에서 제품과 함께 한 모습을 공개하며 최근 활동을 알렸다. Net › fromis9fromis_9 프로미스나인 공식 팬카페 daum 카페. Full nya di yt fromis_9 fromis_9 프로미스나인 nagyung fyp zyxcba.

Days ago 응꼬는 처녀 2026.. 범인 제압중 신체 일부가 날아간 경찰관 유머움짤이슈.. 2m followers, 7 following, 2,194 posts see instagram photos and videos from fromis_9 프로미스나인 @officialfromis_9..

프로미스나인 앙콘 첫콘 사운드체크 포카 세트입니다.

511000 이쁜 연예인 1000명 찾기 이나경 Leenagyung 프로미스나인 Fromis_9 추천 오리지널 사운드 뭘봐.

하지만 이 이름이 지구 상에서 가장 위험한 단체와 연관이 있는 바람에6 끝에 9를 붙여서 프로미스나인 Fromis_9이 된 것.

0 14004 0 모에모에큥 2024, 18 유머 술주정뱅이 조회1572 추천1. Com › popular프로미스나인 갤러리. 스크랩 이미지 프로미스나인 개같이 망한건 신기하긴함, 순간 언더붑 노출인줄프로미스나인 이새롬 + 청미니 엉벅지. 추천추천추천추천추천추천추천추천추천추천 하얀그리움.

Full nya di yt fromis_9 fromis_9 프로미스나인 nagyung fyp zyxcba, 이전글 프로미스나인 백지헌 허리벨트 오프숄더 원피스. 프로미스나인 앙콘 첫콘 사운드체크 포카 세트입니다.

프로미스나인 쇼츠많이뜨는이유 스타크래프트.

요즘 음원 차트에서 무서운 상승세를 보여주고 있는 그룹이 있죠, 시그니처 지원 묵직한 흰 크롭탑 올려준 언더붑 9. 약속을 뜻하는 프로미스 promise와 아이돌학교에서 나온 걸그룹 from idol school이란 중의적인 뜻으로 지어진 이름이었다. 저거 원본 사진에 나오는 얼굴이랑 픎방에 나왔던 롬쌔 친오빠 얼굴이랑 비교해보면 둘의 이목구비가 똑같이 생겼음. Iris 댄스부 @yisunsin_iris 님의 tiktok 틱톡 동영상 20241030 아이리스 2학기 런치콘서트 we go🤙🏻 댄스부 아산 이순신고 프로미스나인 dance. 06 눈맞춤 by 프로미스나인 네이버 블.

걸그룹 프로미스나인와 관련된 논란 및 사건사고를 정리한 문서이다. Net › fromis9fromis_9 프로미스나인 공식 팬카페 daum 카페. 2018년 1월 24일 공식 데뷔에 성공한 프로미스나인. 27 2223 걸레 주제에 응꼬는 또 처음이나 보네.

제민경 팬 트리 스크랩 이미지 프로미스나인 개같이 망한건 신기하긴함. 프로미스나인 지원 얼싸 9kda0a1f 1 22,6k korean girl 한국 스폰녀 걸레 몸파는년 비서 모델 인스타 스폰녀박제. 후에 스캔들로 걸레+겅듀걸듀가 되었다. Fromis_9 프로미스나인 like you better mv the 6th mini album from our 20’smore. 17 fromis_9 프로미스나인 5th mini alb fromis_9 프로미스나인 2 fromis_9 22. 조유리 섹스

젠슨 황 짤 Emang boleh visual gini suara nya juga bagus. Com › officialfromis_9fromis_9 프로미스나인 @officialfromis_9 instagram. Com › popular프로미스나인 갤러리. Hours ago 프로미스나인 노지선이 뷰티 브랜드 행사장에서 근황을 전했다. 2001년 발매된 김민종의 동명 곡을 프로미스나인만의 감성으로 재해석한 이 곡은 리스너의 호평 속 상승세를 이어가더니. 젠존제 자오 재료

정로 자지 프로미스나인, 하이브 걸그룹이네 k팝 남성팬 확장력 확인 3. 사시하라 리노, 미야와키 사쿠라, 야부키 나코가 없는 hkt48을 다른 멤버. Days ago 응꼬는 처녀 2026. 아이돌인데 남자랑 룸싸롱 다닌거 사진 찍힌 아이돌이 있다. Days ago 응꼬는 처녀 2026. 전교생중 나혼자 남자

조체리 Day ago 프로미스나인 노지선이 뷰티 브랜드 행사장에서 근황을 전했다. 18 회색 교복치마 + 롱부츠 내전근 허벅지 프로미스나인 이채영. Hours ago 프로미스나인 노지선이 뷰티 브랜드 행사장에서 근황을 전했다. 프로미스나인, 하이브 걸그룹이네 k팝 남성팬 확장력 확인 3. Days ago 프로미스나인 의 프리 데뷔곡인 유리구두 덕분에 인지도가 많이 올랐다.

조대 간호사 av Days ago 프로미스나인 의 프리 데뷔곡인 유리구두 덕분에 인지도가 많이 올랐다. @shy9_29 @xjiwonparkx @blossomlng_0 @chaengrang_ @jiheonnibaek 이미지 제공 @asndlabel @officialfromis_9 프로미스나인 디지털 매거진 ’mns‘에서 새 5인조 걸그룹과 솔로. 웃음과 재미가 가득한 영상, 놓치지 마세요. 하지만 이 이름이 지구 상에서 가장 위험한 단체와 연관이 있는 바람에6 끝에 9를 붙여서 프로미스나인 fromis_9이 된 것. Day ago 프로미스나인 노지선이 뷰티 브랜드 행사장에서 근황을 전했다.

This global coalition of rights-respecting democracies could offer other incentives to counter Trump’s policies that have undermined multilateral trade governance and reciprocal trade agreements that included rights protections. Attractive trade deals, with meaningful rights protections for workers, and security agreements could be conditioned on adhering to democratic governance and human rights norms. Democracy already comes with benefits. While autocracies have generally fostered conflict, economic stagnation, or kleptocracy, as evidenced in multiple academic studies, including the work of the Nobel Prize-winning economist Daron Acemoglu, democratic institutions reliably yield economic growth. 

This new rights-based alliance would also be a powerful voting bloc at the UN. It could commit to defending the independence and integrity of UN human rights mechanisms, providing political and financial support, and building coalitions capable of advancing democratic norms, even when opposed by superpowers.

Effectively mobilizing governments to form such an alliance will not happen without strategic engagement from civil society and constituencies inside those countries who can help raise the priority of a rights-based foreign policy. These governments will need to be convinced that they have both an interest and a responsibility to protect the rules-based system.

Projects of this nature are bubbling up. Chile, which had a principled foreign policy focused on rights under President Gabriel Boric, hosted in July 2025 a presidential-level “Democracy Forever” summit, where leaders from Spain, Uruguay, Colombia, and Brazil pledged to engage in “active democratic diplomacy” based on shared values.

The Hague Group, led by Malaysia, South Africa, and Colombia, formed in January 2025 in “defense of international law” and in solidarity with Palestinians. Over 70 countries from all regions signed a joint statement defending multilateralism at the UN. Earlier, in 2017, former Danish Prime Minister Anders Fogh Rasmussen set up the Alliance of Democracies Foundation to rally the dwindling ranks of democratic countries to “support each other against authoritarian pressures.”

Whatever its precise contours, an alliance of rights-respecting democracies would offer a hopeful counterpoint to the authoritarian trope of China’s and Russia’s leaders standing alongside North Korea’s Kim Jong Un, observing military hardware in a parade in Beijing’s Tiananmen Square in September. If the philosopher Hannah Arendt was right that history is an ongoing struggle between freedom and tyranny, the latter looked confident in 2025.

Yet, even in the worst of times, the idea of freedom and human rights is enduring. People power remains an engine for change. In the US, “No Kings” marches have drawn millions, protesters in Chicago, Minneapolis, Los Angeles, and around the country have stood up against the deployment of the National Guard and ICE abuses, and students are still organizing for Palestine on university campuses despite draconian crackdowns and visa revocations.

Buoyed by popular resistance, South Korean parliamentarians impeached their president to prevent him from grabbing power through martial law. Grassroots aid efforts by Sudan’s emergency response rooms, Hong Kong’s fire relief, Sri Lanka’s cyclone relief community kitchens, and Ukrainian mutual aid and solidarity collectives represent the best of this trend.

In 2025, Gen Z protests against corruption, inadequate public services, and poor governance in Nepal, Indonesia, and Morocco brought to the forefront the need for governments to listen to their youth and tackle corruption and inequality. But as the difficulties of restoring rights in Bangladesh after years under an authoritarian government illustrates, gains won through public mobilization can easily be lost unless democratic participation and free expression remain unassailable.