Will Human Rights Survive a Trumpian World?

Authoritarian Advances Threaten Rules-Based Order

The global human rights system is in peril. Under relentless pressure from US President Donald Trump, and persistently undermined by China and Russia, the rules-based international order is being crushed, threatening to take with it the architecture human rights defenders have come to rely on to advance norms and protect freedoms. To defy this trend, governments that still value human rights, alongside social movements, civil society, and international institutions, need to form a strategic alliance to push back.

To be fair, the downward spiral predated Trump’s reelection. The democratic wave that began over 50 years ago has given way to what scholars term a “democratic recession.” Democracy is now back to 1985 levels according to some metrics, with 72 percent of the world’s population now living under autocracy. Russia and China are less free today than 20 years ago. And so is the United States.

Of course, democracy is not a panacea for human rights violations; the US and other longtime democracies have their own histories of colonial crimes, racism, abusive justice systems, and wartime atrocities. More recently, authoritarian leaders have exploited public mistrust and anger to win elections and then dismantled the very institutions that brought them to power. Democratic institutions are crucial to represent the will of the people and keep power in check. It’s no surprise that whenever democracy is undermined, rights are too, as evident in recent years in India, Türkiye, the Philippines, El Salvador, and Hungary.

In this context, 2025 may be seen as a tipping point. In just 12 months, the Trump administration has carried out a broad assault on key pillars of US democracy and the global rules-based order, which the US, despite inconsistencies, was, with other states, instrumental in helping to establish.

In short order, Trump’s second-term administration has undermined trust in the sanctity of elections, reduced government accountability, gutted food assistance and healthcare subsidies, attacked judicial independence, defied court orders, rolled back women’s rights, obstructed access to abortion care, undermined remedies for racial harm, terminated programs mandating accessibility for people with disabilities, punished free speech, stripped protections from trans and intersex people, eroded privacy, and used government power to intimidate political opponents, the media, law firms, universities, civil society, and even comedians.

Claiming a risk of “civilizational erasure” in Europe and leaning on racist tropes to cast entire populations as unwelcome in the US, the Trump administration has embraced policies and rhetoric that align with white nationalist ideology. Immigrants and asylum seekers have been subjected to inhumane conditions and degrading treatment; 32 died in US Immigration and Customs Enforcement custody in 2025, and as of mid-January 2026, an additional 4 have died. Masked immigration enforcement agents have targeted people of color, using excessive force, terrorizing communities, wrongfully arresting scores of citizens, and, most recently, unjustifiably killing two people in Minneapolis, whose deaths Human Rights Watch has documented.

The US president of course has the authority to tighten US borders and enforce stricter immigration policies. The administration is not, however, entitled to deny legal process to asylum seekers, mistreat undocumented migrants, or unlawfully discriminate. In a well-functioning democracy, no electoral mandate should supersede domestic legislation, constitutional protections, or international human rights law. Trump’s team has repeatedly bypassed these guardrails.

The violations have not stopped at the border. The Trump administration used a 1798 law to send hundreds of Venezuelan migrants to an infamous prison in El Salvador, where they were tortured and sexually abused. Its blatantly unlawful strikes on boats in the Caribbean and the Pacific extrajudicially killed more than 120 people whom Trump claims were drug traffickers.

After the US attacked Venezuela and apprehended its president, Nicolás Maduro, and his wife, Cilia Flores, Trump claimed the US would “run” the country and control its vast oil reserves. Despite paying lip service to human rights concerns under Maduro at the United Nations, Trump has worked with the same repressive apparatus to further US interests. Many Western allies have chosen to stay silent about these lawless moves, perhaps fearing erratic tariffs and blowback to their alliances.

Trump’s foreign policy has upended the foundations of the rules-based order that seeks to advance democracy and human rights, even if imperfectly.

Trump has boasted that he doesn’t “need international law” as a constraint, only his “own morality.” His administration has politicized the US State Department’s annual human rights report, stepped away from the global prohibition on antipersonnel landmines, voiced support for rewriting international rules on asylum, and skipped the UN’s Universal Periodic Review of the US’ human rights record.

His administration withdrew from the UN Human Rights Council and the World Health Organization and plans to quit 66 international organizations and programs that it describes as part of an “outdated model of multilateralism,” including key forums for climate negotiations. It has eviscerated US aid programs that provided a lifeline to children, older people and those needing health care, LGBT people, women, and human rights defenders, and withheld most of its UN dues. 

Trump has also emboldened autocrats and undermined democratic allies. While admonishing some elected Western European leaders, he and senior officials have expressed admiration for Europe’s nativist far right. He has favored autocrats such as Hungary’s Prime Minister Viktor Orban, Türkiye’s President Recep Tayyip Erdoğan, and El Salvador’s President Nayib Bukele, while continuing decades of US support to Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman and Egypt’s President Abdel Fattah al-Sisi.

His administration has unjustifiably imposed sanctions to punish respected Palestinian human rights organizations, the International Criminal Court’s (ICC) prosecutor and many of its judges, a UN special rapporteur, and for several months, a Brazilian Supreme Court judge and his wife.

The institutional response in the US to Trump’s power grabs has been shockingly muted. Much of Congress, controlled by his own party, has not challenged his supercharged expansion of executive power. The leaders of the US’ most powerful technology companies have made significant donations and sought to placate the president. Some big law firms and prestigious universities have made deals rather than assert their independence, and some media organizations seem afraid to attract the president’s ire.

Has the US switched sides on the human rights playing field? While US engagement with human rights institutions has always been selective, China and Russia have long pursued an illiberal agenda. They stand much to gain from a US government that now expresses open hostility to universal rights. China and Russia remain strategic rivals of the US, but all three countries are now led by leaders who share open disdain for norms and institutions that could constrain their power.

Together, they wield considerable economic, military, and diplomatic power. If they were to consistently act as allies of convenience to erode global rules, they could threaten the entire system. Already, a loose international network of countries such as North Korea, Iran, Venezuela, Myanmar, Cuba, and Belarus work in concert with Russia and China. These leaders share very little ideologically but align in undermining human rights and promoting a regressive international agenda. In word and in practice, the US government is now helping them in this endeavor.

The US’ weakening of multilateral institutions also dealt a serious blow to global efforts to prevent or stop grave international crimes. The “never again” movement, born from the horrors of the Holocaust and reignited by the Rwandan and Bosnian genocides, spurred the UN General Assembly to embrace the Responsibility to Protect (R2P) in 2005. Meant to guide international intervention to prevent and stop atrocities in tandem with efforts to prosecute and punish serious crimes, R2P made a real difference in places like the Central African Republic and Kenya.

Today, R2P is rarely invoked and the ICC is under siege. In addition to Trump’s far-reaching sanctions, in December 2025 a Moscow court sentenced the ICC prosecutor and eight of its judges to prison terms in absentia. Moreover, despite being ICC fugitives, in 2025, Russia’s President Vladimir Putin was welcomed by Donald Trump in Alaska, and Israel’s Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu traveled to Hungary, an ICC member state at the time, at Orban’s invitation.

Twenty years ago, the US government and civil society were instrumental in galvanizing a response to mass atrocities in Darfur. Sudan is burning again, but this time under Trump, with relative impunity. Sudan’s Rapid Support Forces (RSF), which emerged from the militias that led the prior ethnic cleansing campaign, are again committing murder and rape on a mass scale. A growing body of evidence indicates that the UAE, a longtime US ally that recently made multi-billion-dollar deals with Trump, is providing the RSF with military support.

In the Occupied Palestinian Territory, the Israeli armed forces have committed acts of genocide, ethnic cleansing, and crimes against humanity, killing over 70,000 people since the October 2023 Hamas-led attacks on Israel and displacing the vast majority of Gaza’s population. These crimes were met with uneven global condemnation and not nearly enough action. Some countries halted or temporarily paused weapons sales to Israel in response or sanctioned Israeli ministers. Trump, however, continued a long-standing US policy of almost unconditional support to Israel, even as the International Court of Justice is weighing allegations of genocide and has issued binding orders under the Genocide Convention to protect Palestinians’ rights.

Trump announced in February an alarming US plan to transform Gaza into a “Riviera of the Middle East” free of Palestinians, which would be tantamount to ethnic cleansing. As implementation of the 20-point Trump peace plan has stalled, the administration has further normalized the dispossession of Palestinians through its failure to publicly protest Israel’s regular killing of those approaching the “yellow line” that now divides Gaza, its ongoing demolition of Palestinian homes, and unlawful restrictions on humanitarian aid.

In Ukraine, Trump’s peace efforts have consistently downplayed Russia’s responsibility for serious violations. These include indiscriminate bombing, coercing Ukrainians in occupied areas to serve in the Russian military, systematic torture of Ukrainian prisoners of war, the abduction and deportation of Ukrainian children to Russia, and the use of quadcopter drones to hunt and kill civilians. Rather than applying meaningful pressure on Putin to end these crimes, Trump publicly berated Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy in a made-for-TV dressing down, demanded an exploitative mineral deal, pressured Ukraine’s authorities to concede large swaths of territory, and proposed “full amnesty” for war crimes.

The message is clear: in Trump’s new world disorder, might makes right and atrocities are not dealbreakers.

고멤 좀 찾아보니 빨간약 닉네임들 방송들은 잘 모르겠던데 볼만한가요. 고멤 좀 찾아보니 빨간약 닉네임들 방송들은 잘 모르겠던데 볼만한가요. 젠투도 있고 길버트도 진짜 빨간약 잇음. Kr › board › lostark로스트아크 인벤 풍신 빨간약 그만드시고 로빌로 보세요 로스트아.

도디 알파예드

도화령 카페

Siie_nzaoqi2vvujok nct 127 8년차 레전드 비주얼과 독기칠nct127 nct 마크 정우 엔시티127 엔시티. 음지에서 왁파고 빨간약 보고와버림 치지직. Com › board › wackgood우왁굳의 비밀 빨간약 주의 우왁굳유튜버 마이너 갤러리. 풍신나 풍신이 참여한 억지밈 고놀에서 풍신 이름과 관련된 억지밈이다. 우왁굳 고정멤버 독고혜지 텐션 그리고 애기풍신 ㅋㅋㅋ. 성격 근본적으로 정의롭고 성실하고 선량하며 소심한 찐따 히키코모리이다.

도파민,풍신,이덕수 뢴트가 할배 성대로 변조 닌닌,빅토리 비챤 아이스께끼크리즈 크리즈 아바타 조종은 고용해서 함 마찬가지 께끼가 크리즈 목소리로 녹음 그외에 우왁굳이 융터르,호드 등등 고멤에 50%를 자신에 목소리로 넣음. 대한민국의 인터넷 방송인 이자 우왁굳 의 왁타버스 고멤 클래식 1기생이다. Com › 4572152420빨간약왁타버스 고정멤버 버튜버 에펨코리아, 예를 들어 고멤에서 a지만 b로도 방송하고 있고.

젠투도 있고 길버트도 진짜 빨간약 잇음. 패치후 기존 3오의 10프로 너프3오의 4오의 나선x 10프로 우세4오의 나선x 4오의 나선 뇌명 15프로 우세이게 맞나요. 레벨36 esports 풍신 감다살인가. Com › 5685990679고멤 빨간약 방송 좀 알려주실분.

부정형인간 dangchan 왁파고 행복할 뻔한 유니콘 캘리칼리 데이비슨 강지형 배신자 풍신 흐므루 독고혜지 김챠멜 소피아 닼발 이덕수 할아바이 붕붕붕, 조회 수 9304 추천 수 우왁굳 고정멤버 독고혜지 텐션 그리고 애기풍신 ㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋ. 젠투도 있고 길버트도 진짜 빨간약 잇음, 우왁굳 고정멤버 풍신 빨간약 공개 치지직. 풍신 흐므루 독고혜지 김챠멜 소피아 닼발 이덕수 할아바이 붕붕붕 티파니하쿠 릴리먀릴리 호드 준99 김치만두번역택사스사가 문택.

덕코프 유령 잡는법

Com › 8821145981빨간약 귀칼에서 나오는 호흡 이펙트들은 실제로 안나옴 치지직, 드래곤볼 팬들 입장에선 괴리감이 느껴질 정도로 프리저에 대해 어떻게 생각하냐는 질의엔 오히려 프리저를 싫어. Debut pv 『우왁굳 경의 고정멤버이자 플로렌스 왕국의 고귀한 혈통』 soop 방송국의 소개 글. 트짹 상황 정리해줄게 우왁굳유튜버 마이너 갤러리, 일반 사주를 본게 아니라 그냥 풍신 빨간약을 본거 아니노 ㅋㅋ, 방송에 풍신이 등장하거나 긍정적인 분위기에 사용된다.

트짹 상황 정리해줄게 우왁굳유튜버 마이너 갤러리.. Com › 5685990679고멤 빨간약 방송 좀 알려주실분.. 고점을 버그로 방어하고 있었다니 빨간약.. 드래곤볼 팬들 입장에선 괴리감이 느껴질 정도로 프리저에 대해 어떻게 생각하냐는 질의엔 오히려 프리저를 싫어..

고점을 버그로 방어하고 있었다니 빨간약 제대로네요. 고점을 버그로 방어하고 있었다니 빨간약, 풍신 흐므루 독고혜지 김챠멜 소피아 닼발 이덕수 할아바이 붕붕붕 티파니하쿠 릴리먀릴리 호드 준99 김치만두번역택사스사가 문택. 대한민국의 인터넷 방송인 이자 우왁굳 의 왁타버스 고멤 클래식 1기생이다. 방송에 풍신이 등장하거나 긍정적인 분위기에 사용된다.

두디 유출 우왁굳유튜버 마이너 갤러리 풍신 빨간약 진짜임. Com › 4572152420빨간약왁타버스 고정멤버 버튜버 에펨코리아. Com › community › board버튜버 빨간약 유출됐는데 진짜 그냥 아저씨가 하는 거네. 방송에 풍신이 등장하거나 긍정적인 분위기에 사용된다. Redirecting to sgall. 덴지 아사 야스

도욤 펨코 물색의 방 처럼 멘붕물+어두운 분위기를 가진 만화지만 내용이 좀더 깊고중학생인 여주와 남주의 사춘기,사랑, 성장이야기라고 보면 될거같음그림체. 고점을 버그로 방어하고 있었다니 빨간약. 물색의 방 처럼 멘붕물+어두운 분위기를 가진 만화지만 내용이 좀더 깊고중학생인 여주와 남주의 사춘기,사랑, 성장이야기라고 보면 될거같음그림체. 독고혜지 김챠멜미츠네하쿠 먀릴리비빌소녀 크리스탈리풍신 흐므루도파민박사 폭행이덕수할아바이 붕붕붕왁파고 행복할뻔한유니콘닌닌 문금소피아 닼발단답벌레 아아아aaa곽춘식 취성남캘리칼리데이. 그 상황을 본 풍신이 누군가의 팬이라면 그 사람을 응원 버튜버는 빨간약 실물이긴한데 그냥 하쿠란걸 빨간약이라 한듯 뢴트는. 덕르코프 갤

도욤 나무위키 젠투도 있고 길버트도 진짜 빨간약 잇음. 그 상황을 본 풍신이 누군가의 팬이라면 그 사람을 응원 버튜버는 빨간약 실물이긴한데 그냥 하쿠란걸 빨간약이라 한듯 뢴트는. 일반 사주를 본게 아니라 그냥 풍신 빨간약을 본거 아니노 ㅋㅋ. 우왁굳 고정멤버 풍신 빨간약 공개 치지직. 트짹 상황 정리해줄게 우왁굳유튜버 마이너 갤러리. 디시 ㄱㅅ

덕배입니다 야동 서머너즈 워 천공의 아레나몬스터 일람불 속성 r1511 판. 서머너즈 워 천공의 아레나몬스터 일람불 속성 r1511 판. Debut pv 『우왁굳 경의 고정멤버이자 플로렌스 왕국의 고귀한 혈통』 soop 방송국의 소개 글. ㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋ 풍신 춘식이 빨간약으로 방송했으면 루숙급 인기였다 dc app. 풍신 흐므루 독고혜지 김챠멜 소피아 닼발 이덕수 할아바이 붕붕붕 티파니하쿠 릴리먀릴리 호드 준99 김치만두번역택사스사가 문택.

덕 코프 유령 15 잡담 고여름_ 조회9304 추천6 우왁굳 고정멤버 독고혜지 텐션 그리고 애기풍신 ㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋ. Kr › board › lostark로스트아크 인벤 풍신 빨간약 그만드시고 로빌로 보세요 로스트아. 드래곤볼 팬들 입장에선 괴리감이 느껴질 정도로 프리저에 대해 어떻게 생각하냐는 질의엔 오히려 프리저를 싫어. Kr › board › lostark로스트아크 인벤 스트라이커 게시판. 우왁굳유튜버 마이너 갤러리 하쿠 빨간약은 진짜.

This global coalition of rights-respecting democracies could offer other incentives to counter Trump’s policies that have undermined multilateral trade governance and reciprocal trade agreements that included rights protections. Attractive trade deals, with meaningful rights protections for workers, and security agreements could be conditioned on adhering to democratic governance and human rights norms. Democracy already comes with benefits. While autocracies have generally fostered conflict, economic stagnation, or kleptocracy, as evidenced in multiple academic studies, including the work of the Nobel Prize-winning economist Daron Acemoglu, democratic institutions reliably yield economic growth. 

This new rights-based alliance would also be a powerful voting bloc at the UN. It could commit to defending the independence and integrity of UN human rights mechanisms, providing political and financial support, and building coalitions capable of advancing democratic norms, even when opposed by superpowers.

Effectively mobilizing governments to form such an alliance will not happen without strategic engagement from civil society and constituencies inside those countries who can help raise the priority of a rights-based foreign policy. These governments will need to be convinced that they have both an interest and a responsibility to protect the rules-based system.

Projects of this nature are bubbling up. Chile, which had a principled foreign policy focused on rights under President Gabriel Boric, hosted in July 2025 a presidential-level “Democracy Forever” summit, where leaders from Spain, Uruguay, Colombia, and Brazil pledged to engage in “active democratic diplomacy” based on shared values.

The Hague Group, led by Malaysia, South Africa, and Colombia, formed in January 2025 in “defense of international law” and in solidarity with Palestinians. Over 70 countries from all regions signed a joint statement defending multilateralism at the UN. Earlier, in 2017, former Danish Prime Minister Anders Fogh Rasmussen set up the Alliance of Democracies Foundation to rally the dwindling ranks of democratic countries to “support each other against authoritarian pressures.”

Whatever its precise contours, an alliance of rights-respecting democracies would offer a hopeful counterpoint to the authoritarian trope of China’s and Russia’s leaders standing alongside North Korea’s Kim Jong Un, observing military hardware in a parade in Beijing’s Tiananmen Square in September. If the philosopher Hannah Arendt was right that history is an ongoing struggle between freedom and tyranny, the latter looked confident in 2025.

Yet, even in the worst of times, the idea of freedom and human rights is enduring. People power remains an engine for change. In the US, “No Kings” marches have drawn millions, protesters in Chicago, Minneapolis, Los Angeles, and around the country have stood up against the deployment of the National Guard and ICE abuses, and students are still organizing for Palestine on university campuses despite draconian crackdowns and visa revocations.

Buoyed by popular resistance, South Korean parliamentarians impeached their president to prevent him from grabbing power through martial law. Grassroots aid efforts by Sudan’s emergency response rooms, Hong Kong’s fire relief, Sri Lanka’s cyclone relief community kitchens, and Ukrainian mutual aid and solidarity collectives represent the best of this trend.

In 2025, Gen Z protests against corruption, inadequate public services, and poor governance in Nepal, Indonesia, and Morocco brought to the forefront the need for governments to listen to their youth and tackle corruption and inequality. But as the difficulties of restoring rights in Bangladesh after years under an authoritarian government illustrates, gains won through public mobilization can easily be lost unless democratic participation and free expression remain unassailable.