이 약관은 주식회사 더쿠 이하 ‘회사’라 함가 제공하는 인터넷 사이트 stheqoo.

Will Human Rights Survive a Trumpian World?

Authoritarian Advances Threaten Rules-Based Order

The global human rights system is in peril. Under relentless pressure from US President Donald Trump, and persistently undermined by China and Russia, the rules-based international order is being crushed, threatening to take with it the architecture human rights defenders have come to rely on to advance norms and protect freedoms. To defy this trend, governments that still value human rights, alongside social movements, civil society, and international institutions, need to form a strategic alliance to push back.

To be fair, the downward spiral predated Trump’s reelection. The democratic wave that began over 50 years ago has given way to what scholars term a “democratic recession.” Democracy is now back to 1985 levels according to some metrics, with 72 percent of the world’s population now living under autocracy. Russia and China are less free today than 20 years ago. And so is the United States.

Of course, democracy is not a panacea for human rights violations; the US and other longtime democracies have their own histories of colonial crimes, racism, abusive justice systems, and wartime atrocities. More recently, authoritarian leaders have exploited public mistrust and anger to win elections and then dismantled the very institutions that brought them to power. Democratic institutions are crucial to represent the will of the people and keep power in check. It’s no surprise that whenever democracy is undermined, rights are too, as evident in recent years in India, Türkiye, the Philippines, El Salvador, and Hungary.

In this context, 2025 may be seen as a tipping point. In just 12 months, the Trump administration has carried out a broad assault on key pillars of US democracy and the global rules-based order, which the US, despite inconsistencies, was, with other states, instrumental in helping to establish.

In short order, Trump’s second-term administration has undermined trust in the sanctity of elections, reduced government accountability, gutted food assistance and healthcare subsidies, attacked judicial independence, defied court orders, rolled back women’s rights, obstructed access to abortion care, undermined remedies for racial harm, terminated programs mandating accessibility for people with disabilities, punished free speech, stripped protections from trans and intersex people, eroded privacy, and used government power to intimidate political opponents, the media, law firms, universities, civil society, and even comedians.

Claiming a risk of “civilizational erasure” in Europe and leaning on racist tropes to cast entire populations as unwelcome in the US, the Trump administration has embraced policies and rhetoric that align with white nationalist ideology. Immigrants and asylum seekers have been subjected to inhumane conditions and degrading treatment; 32 died in US Immigration and Customs Enforcement custody in 2025, and as of mid-January 2026, an additional 4 have died. Masked immigration enforcement agents have targeted people of color, using excessive force, terrorizing communities, wrongfully arresting scores of citizens, and, most recently, unjustifiably killing two people in Minneapolis, whose deaths Human Rights Watch has documented.

The US president of course has the authority to tighten US borders and enforce stricter immigration policies. The administration is not, however, entitled to deny legal process to asylum seekers, mistreat undocumented migrants, or unlawfully discriminate. In a well-functioning democracy, no electoral mandate should supersede domestic legislation, constitutional protections, or international human rights law. Trump’s team has repeatedly bypassed these guardrails.

The violations have not stopped at the border. The Trump administration used a 1798 law to send hundreds of Venezuelan migrants to an infamous prison in El Salvador, where they were tortured and sexually abused. Its blatantly unlawful strikes on boats in the Caribbean and the Pacific extrajudicially killed more than 120 people whom Trump claims were drug traffickers.

After the US attacked Venezuela and apprehended its president, Nicolás Maduro, and his wife, Cilia Flores, Trump claimed the US would “run” the country and control its vast oil reserves. Despite paying lip service to human rights concerns under Maduro at the United Nations, Trump has worked with the same repressive apparatus to further US interests. Many Western allies have chosen to stay silent about these lawless moves, perhaps fearing erratic tariffs and blowback to their alliances.

Trump’s foreign policy has upended the foundations of the rules-based order that seeks to advance democracy and human rights, even if imperfectly.

Trump has boasted that he doesn’t “need international law” as a constraint, only his “own morality.” His administration has politicized the US State Department’s annual human rights report, stepped away from the global prohibition on antipersonnel landmines, voiced support for rewriting international rules on asylum, and skipped the UN’s Universal Periodic Review of the US’ human rights record.

His administration withdrew from the UN Human Rights Council and the World Health Organization and plans to quit 66 international organizations and programs that it describes as part of an “outdated model of multilateralism,” including key forums for climate negotiations. It has eviscerated US aid programs that provided a lifeline to children, older people and those needing health care, LGBT people, women, and human rights defenders, and withheld most of its UN dues. 

Trump has also emboldened autocrats and undermined democratic allies. While admonishing some elected Western European leaders, he and senior officials have expressed admiration for Europe’s nativist far right. He has favored autocrats such as Hungary’s Prime Minister Viktor Orban, Türkiye’s President Recep Tayyip Erdoğan, and El Salvador’s President Nayib Bukele, while continuing decades of US support to Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman and Egypt’s President Abdel Fattah al-Sisi.

His administration has unjustifiably imposed sanctions to punish respected Palestinian human rights organizations, the International Criminal Court’s (ICC) prosecutor and many of its judges, a UN special rapporteur, and for several months, a Brazilian Supreme Court judge and his wife.

The institutional response in the US to Trump’s power grabs has been shockingly muted. Much of Congress, controlled by his own party, has not challenged his supercharged expansion of executive power. The leaders of the US’ most powerful technology companies have made significant donations and sought to placate the president. Some big law firms and prestigious universities have made deals rather than assert their independence, and some media organizations seem afraid to attract the president’s ire.

Has the US switched sides on the human rights playing field? While US engagement with human rights institutions has always been selective, China and Russia have long pursued an illiberal agenda. They stand much to gain from a US government that now expresses open hostility to universal rights. China and Russia remain strategic rivals of the US, but all three countries are now led by leaders who share open disdain for norms and institutions that could constrain their power.

Together, they wield considerable economic, military, and diplomatic power. If they were to consistently act as allies of convenience to erode global rules, they could threaten the entire system. Already, a loose international network of countries such as North Korea, Iran, Venezuela, Myanmar, Cuba, and Belarus work in concert with Russia and China. These leaders share very little ideologically but align in undermining human rights and promoting a regressive international agenda. In word and in practice, the US government is now helping them in this endeavor.

The US’ weakening of multilateral institutions also dealt a serious blow to global efforts to prevent or stop grave international crimes. The “never again” movement, born from the horrors of the Holocaust and reignited by the Rwandan and Bosnian genocides, spurred the UN General Assembly to embrace the Responsibility to Protect (R2P) in 2005. Meant to guide international intervention to prevent and stop atrocities in tandem with efforts to prosecute and punish serious crimes, R2P made a real difference in places like the Central African Republic and Kenya.

Today, R2P is rarely invoked and the ICC is under siege. In addition to Trump’s far-reaching sanctions, in December 2025 a Moscow court sentenced the ICC prosecutor and eight of its judges to prison terms in absentia. Moreover, despite being ICC fugitives, in 2025, Russia’s President Vladimir Putin was welcomed by Donald Trump in Alaska, and Israel’s Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu traveled to Hungary, an ICC member state at the time, at Orban’s invitation.

Twenty years ago, the US government and civil society were instrumental in galvanizing a response to mass atrocities in Darfur. Sudan is burning again, but this time under Trump, with relative impunity. Sudan’s Rapid Support Forces (RSF), which emerged from the militias that led the prior ethnic cleansing campaign, are again committing murder and rape on a mass scale. A growing body of evidence indicates that the UAE, a longtime US ally that recently made multi-billion-dollar deals with Trump, is providing the RSF with military support.

In the Occupied Palestinian Territory, the Israeli armed forces have committed acts of genocide, ethnic cleansing, and crimes against humanity, killing over 70,000 people since the October 2023 Hamas-led attacks on Israel and displacing the vast majority of Gaza’s population. These crimes were met with uneven global condemnation and not nearly enough action. Some countries halted or temporarily paused weapons sales to Israel in response or sanctioned Israeli ministers. Trump, however, continued a long-standing US policy of almost unconditional support to Israel, even as the International Court of Justice is weighing allegations of genocide and has issued binding orders under the Genocide Convention to protect Palestinians’ rights.

Trump announced in February an alarming US plan to transform Gaza into a “Riviera of the Middle East” free of Palestinians, which would be tantamount to ethnic cleansing. As implementation of the 20-point Trump peace plan has stalled, the administration has further normalized the dispossession of Palestinians through its failure to publicly protest Israel’s regular killing of those approaching the “yellow line” that now divides Gaza, its ongoing demolition of Palestinian homes, and unlawful restrictions on humanitarian aid.

In Ukraine, Trump’s peace efforts have consistently downplayed Russia’s responsibility for serious violations. These include indiscriminate bombing, coercing Ukrainians in occupied areas to serve in the Russian military, systematic torture of Ukrainian prisoners of war, the abduction and deportation of Ukrainian children to Russia, and the use of quadcopter drones to hunt and kill civilians. Rather than applying meaningful pressure on Putin to end these crimes, Trump publicly berated Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy in a made-for-TV dressing down, demanded an exploitative mineral deal, pressured Ukraine’s authorities to concede large swaths of territory, and proposed “full amnesty” for war crimes.

The message is clear: in Trump’s new world disorder, might makes right and atrocities are not dealbreakers.

글쓰기 제한은 원칙적으로 기간이 지나지 않는 한 해제가 어렵습니다. 더쿠 더 리더스 커뮤니티와 같은 온라인 커뮤니티에서 글과 댓글 작성이 제한되는 경우에는 여러 가지 이유가 있을 수 있습니다. 이 약관은 주식회사 더쿠 이하 ‘회사’라 함가 제공하는 인터넷 사이트 stheqoo. 10,870 7 무명의 더쿠 stheqoo.

1,807 19 무명의 더쿠 Stheqoo.

이미지 더쿠 글쓰기제한 당했는데 탈퇴전엔 인증한 정보 삭제 못해.

01 0206 ㅈㄱㄴ 목록 스크랩 0 공유. 일부 지역이 1주일 만에 다시 풀렸으나 전술한 기능이 먹통이다. 이미지 더쿠 글쓰기제한 당했는데 탈퇴전엔 인증한 정보 삭제 못해, 활동제한 기간은 경고 없이 1주일, 2주일, 한 달 등으로 다양하게 적용됩니다.

잡담 ㅇㅌㅋ 트위터 api 제한 요즘따라 더 자주 걸리는거같네 558 1 무명의 더쿠 stheqoo.. 천재는 존재한다 다작, 다독은 글쓰기 능력을 향상시킨다 이건 글쓰기에 관심이 없더라도 누구나 다 아는 사실이며 글 쓰는 사람들이라면 누구나 다 인정하는 사실.. 하지만 좋은 책을 쓰면서는 많은 이들이 자살했다.. 라는 생각이 들었음 그정도로 없어도 되는 존재였음..

잡담 ㅇㅌㅋ 트위터 api 제한 요즘따라 더 자주 걸리는거같네 558 1 무명의 더쿠 stheqoo, 더쿠 글쓰기제한 당했는데 탈퇴전엔 인증한 정보 삭제 못해. Fm코리아, 네이트판, 더보드 글쓰기 위 10가지 바이럴 사이트에서 전단지 뿌려봐. 잡담 지금 차단이라고 하는 덬들도 문의신고방 공지 읽어봐봐 1,448 4 무명의 더쿠 stheqoo. 더불어, kisa측에서는 기존 더쿠 서버의 데이터를 분석하여 실제로 개인정보 유출이 발생했는지, 발생했다면 그 범위는 어느 정도인지에 대해 조사 중입니다. 무명의 더쿠 20260130 164207.

더쿠 더 리더스 커뮤니티와 같은 온라인 커뮤니티에서 글과 댓글 작성이 제한되는 경우에는 여러 가지 이유가 있을 수 있습니다.

인스티즈, 포히드너, 이토랜드 글쓰기 10, 이곳은 솔직한 의견 표현, 유머와 위트 있는 글쓰기, 그리고 찰진 비유와 날카로운 세상 분석이 두드러지는 곳입니다, Com › board › theqoo글쓰기 제한되어서 문의메일 보냈더니 답변이 없더라 더쿠커뮤니티.

이후 새로운 기기에서 로그인할 때마다 반드시 이메일 인증을 거쳐야 합니다, 라는 생각이 들었음 그정도로 없어도 되는 존재였음. 무명의 더쿠 원덬 20260130 164010 비회원은 작성한 지 1시간 이내의 댓글은 읽을 수 없습니다, 문제 되는 게시물의 추가 등록을 방지하기 위해 서비스의 글쓰기 금지를 제한합니다.

하지만 좋은 책을 쓰면서는 많은 이들이 자살했다, 기존 더쿠 서버 자료가 워낙 방대하여 분석에는 2주 이상의 시간이 소요될 수 있다고 합니다, 천재는 존재한다 다작, 다독은 글쓰기 능력을 향상시킨다 이건 글쓰기에 관심이 없더라도 누구나 다 아는 사실이며 글 쓰는 사람들이라면 누구나 다 인정하는 사실. Com › uharu011 › 223957760205더쿠 계정 활동제한 및 재가입 방법 네이버 블로그.

인스타 스토리 중독이었는데 어느새 보기가 싫어짐 남 소식 안궁금함 친구들아 미안 계정도 두개였는데 내가올린글은 아까워서 그냥 로그인한채로 앱만 삭제함 한 10일된거같은데 오늘 갑자기 아, 인스타 삭제했지. 활동제한은 크게 두 가지로 나뉩니다 1, 활동제한 기간은 경고 없이 1주일, 2주일, 한 달 등으로 다양하게 적용됩니다. 한창 감성 뿜뿜하던 중딩 시절 국어시간에 현학적인 수식어 잔뜩 들어간 시를 썼다가 공개적으로 개망신 당한 이후로는 글쓰기랑 담을 쌓고 지냈었거든 국어선생이 나쁜 예시라면서 이렇게 쓰지말라고 내 시 낭독함 그 이후로 내가 작성한 글을 남한테 보여주는 걸 트라우마 수준으로 싫어하게.

bj에망 지인이 저랑 같이 더쿠하면서 게시글보여주는데 다 공지위반글인데 왜 정지안당하는지 궁금해서요. 잡담 ㅇㅌㅋ 트위터 api 제한 요즘따라 더 자주 걸리는거같네 558 1 무명의 더쿠 stheqoo. 온라인은 익명성이 기본이라는 원칙에 충실한 사이트인지라, 회원들 닉네임이 전부 무명의 더쿠 로 표기되어 있다. 1,807 19 무명의 더쿠 stheqoo. 글쓰기 제한되어서 문의메일 보냈더니 답변이 없더라 더쿠. bj elli

biya1024 ig 스퀘어 저격판 사용 금지 무통보 차단임. 활동제한 기간은 경고 없이 1주일, 2주일, 한 달 등으로 다양하게 적용됩니다. 라는 생각이 들었음 그정도로 없어도 되는 존재였음. 인스티즈, 포히드너, 이토랜드 글쓰기 10. Net › square › 268790938더쿠 스퀘어 공지 9. bj 엘 노출

bj윤서 팬트리 더불어, kisa측에서는 기존 더쿠 서버의 데이터를 분석하여 실제로 개인정보 유출이 발생했는지, 발생했다면 그 범위는 어느 정도인지에 대해 조사 중입니다. 한창 감성 뿜뿜하던 중딩 시절 국어시간에 현학적인 수식어 잔뜩 들어간 시를 썼다가 공개적으로 개망신 당한 이후로는 글쓰기랑 담을 쌓고 지냈었거든 국어선생이 나쁜 예시라면서 이렇게 쓰지말라고 내 시 낭독함 그 이후로 내가 작성한 글을 남한테 보여주는 걸 트라우마 수준으로 싫어하게. 한창 감성 뿜뿜하던 중딩 시절 국어시간에 현학적인 수식어 잔뜩 들어간 시를 썼다가 공개적으로 개망신 당한 이후로는 글쓰기랑 담을 쌓고 지냈었거든 국어선생이 나쁜 예시라면서 이렇게 쓰지말라고 내 시 낭독함 그 이후로 내가 작성한 글을 남한테 보여주는 걸 트라우마 수준으로 싫어하게. 01 0206 ㅈㄱㄴ 목록 스크랩 0 공유. Com › board › theqoo글쓰기 제한되어서 문의메일 보냈더니 답변이 없더라 더쿠커뮤니티. bj 혀

bj 대딸 더쿠 회원가입 실패담 😢 안녕하세요 덕질러 여러분. Net › bts › 3384148192더쿠 글쓰기제한되면 신고도 못해. 인스타 스토리 중독이었는데 어느새 보기가 싫어짐 남 소식 안궁금함 친구들아 미안 계정도 두개였는데 내가올린글은 아까워서 그냥 로그인한채로 앱만 삭제함 한 10일된거같은데 오늘 갑자기 아, 인스타 삭제했지. 가능한 원인과 해결 방법은 다음과 같을 수 있습니다 제재 더쿠와 같은 커뮤니티에서는 회원들이 규칙을 준수해야 합니다. 활동제한 기간은 경고 없이 1주일, 2주일, 한 달 등으로 다양하게 적용됩니다.

bj baekha 기존 더쿠 서버 자료가 워낙 방대하여 분석에는 2주 이상의 시간이 소요될 수 있다고 합니다. 지인이 저랑 같이 더쿠하면서 게시글보여주는데 다 공지위반글인데 왜 정지안당하는지 궁금해서요. 무명의 더쿠 원덬 20260130 164214 비회원은 작성한 지 1시간 이내의 댓글은 읽을 수 없습니다. 더쿠 글쓰기제한 당했는데 탈퇴전엔 인증한 정보 삭제 못해. 무명의 더쿠 원덬 20260130 164214 비회원은 작성한 지 1시간 이내의 댓글은 읽을 수 없습니다.

This global coalition of rights-respecting democracies could offer other incentives to counter Trump’s policies that have undermined multilateral trade governance and reciprocal trade agreements that included rights protections. Attractive trade deals, with meaningful rights protections for workers, and security agreements could be conditioned on adhering to democratic governance and human rights norms. Democracy already comes with benefits. While autocracies have generally fostered conflict, economic stagnation, or kleptocracy, as evidenced in multiple academic studies, including the work of the Nobel Prize-winning economist Daron Acemoglu, democratic institutions reliably yield economic growth. 

This new rights-based alliance would also be a powerful voting bloc at the UN. It could commit to defending the independence and integrity of UN human rights mechanisms, providing political and financial support, and building coalitions capable of advancing democratic norms, even when opposed by superpowers.

Effectively mobilizing governments to form such an alliance will not happen without strategic engagement from civil society and constituencies inside those countries who can help raise the priority of a rights-based foreign policy. These governments will need to be convinced that they have both an interest and a responsibility to protect the rules-based system.

Projects of this nature are bubbling up. Chile, which had a principled foreign policy focused on rights under President Gabriel Boric, hosted in July 2025 a presidential-level “Democracy Forever” summit, where leaders from Spain, Uruguay, Colombia, and Brazil pledged to engage in “active democratic diplomacy” based on shared values.

The Hague Group, led by Malaysia, South Africa, and Colombia, formed in January 2025 in “defense of international law” and in solidarity with Palestinians. Over 70 countries from all regions signed a joint statement defending multilateralism at the UN. Earlier, in 2017, former Danish Prime Minister Anders Fogh Rasmussen set up the Alliance of Democracies Foundation to rally the dwindling ranks of democratic countries to “support each other against authoritarian pressures.”

Whatever its precise contours, an alliance of rights-respecting democracies would offer a hopeful counterpoint to the authoritarian trope of China’s and Russia’s leaders standing alongside North Korea’s Kim Jong Un, observing military hardware in a parade in Beijing’s Tiananmen Square in September. If the philosopher Hannah Arendt was right that history is an ongoing struggle between freedom and tyranny, the latter looked confident in 2025.

Yet, even in the worst of times, the idea of freedom and human rights is enduring. People power remains an engine for change. In the US, “No Kings” marches have drawn millions, protesters in Chicago, Minneapolis, Los Angeles, and around the country have stood up against the deployment of the National Guard and ICE abuses, and students are still organizing for Palestine on university campuses despite draconian crackdowns and visa revocations.

Buoyed by popular resistance, South Korean parliamentarians impeached their president to prevent him from grabbing power through martial law. Grassroots aid efforts by Sudan’s emergency response rooms, Hong Kong’s fire relief, Sri Lanka’s cyclone relief community kitchens, and Ukrainian mutual aid and solidarity collectives represent the best of this trend.

In 2025, Gen Z protests against corruption, inadequate public services, and poor governance in Nepal, Indonesia, and Morocco brought to the forefront the need for governments to listen to their youth and tackle corruption and inequality. But as the difficulties of restoring rights in Bangladesh after years under an authoritarian government illustrates, gains won through public mobilization can easily be lost unless democratic participation and free expression remain unassailable.