Will Human Rights Survive a Trumpian World?

Authoritarian Advances Threaten Rules-Based Order

The global human rights system is in peril. Under relentless pressure from US President Donald Trump, and persistently undermined by China and Russia, the rules-based international order is being crushed, threatening to take with it the architecture human rights defenders have come to rely on to advance norms and protect freedoms. To defy this trend, governments that still value human rights, alongside social movements, civil society, and international institutions, need to form a strategic alliance to push back.

To be fair, the downward spiral predated Trump’s reelection. The democratic wave that began over 50 years ago has given way to what scholars term a “democratic recession.” Democracy is now back to 1985 levels according to some metrics, with 72 percent of the world’s population now living under autocracy. Russia and China are less free today than 20 years ago. And so is the United States.

Of course, democracy is not a panacea for human rights violations; the US and other longtime democracies have their own histories of colonial crimes, racism, abusive justice systems, and wartime atrocities. More recently, authoritarian leaders have exploited public mistrust and anger to win elections and then dismantled the very institutions that brought them to power. Democratic institutions are crucial to represent the will of the people and keep power in check. It’s no surprise that whenever democracy is undermined, rights are too, as evident in recent years in India, Türkiye, the Philippines, El Salvador, and Hungary.

In this context, 2025 may be seen as a tipping point. In just 12 months, the Trump administration has carried out a broad assault on key pillars of US democracy and the global rules-based order, which the US, despite inconsistencies, was, with other states, instrumental in helping to establish.

In short order, Trump’s second-term administration has undermined trust in the sanctity of elections, reduced government accountability, gutted food assistance and healthcare subsidies, attacked judicial independence, defied court orders, rolled back women’s rights, obstructed access to abortion care, undermined remedies for racial harm, terminated programs mandating accessibility for people with disabilities, punished free speech, stripped protections from trans and intersex people, eroded privacy, and used government power to intimidate political opponents, the media, law firms, universities, civil society, and even comedians.

Claiming a risk of “civilizational erasure” in Europe and leaning on racist tropes to cast entire populations as unwelcome in the US, the Trump administration has embraced policies and rhetoric that align with white nationalist ideology. Immigrants and asylum seekers have been subjected to inhumane conditions and degrading treatment; 32 died in US Immigration and Customs Enforcement custody in 2025, and as of mid-January 2026, an additional 4 have died. Masked immigration enforcement agents have targeted people of color, using excessive force, terrorizing communities, wrongfully arresting scores of citizens, and, most recently, unjustifiably killing two people in Minneapolis, whose deaths Human Rights Watch has documented.

The US president of course has the authority to tighten US borders and enforce stricter immigration policies. The administration is not, however, entitled to deny legal process to asylum seekers, mistreat undocumented migrants, or unlawfully discriminate. In a well-functioning democracy, no electoral mandate should supersede domestic legislation, constitutional protections, or international human rights law. Trump’s team has repeatedly bypassed these guardrails.

The violations have not stopped at the border. The Trump administration used a 1798 law to send hundreds of Venezuelan migrants to an infamous prison in El Salvador, where they were tortured and sexually abused. Its blatantly unlawful strikes on boats in the Caribbean and the Pacific extrajudicially killed more than 120 people whom Trump claims were drug traffickers.

After the US attacked Venezuela and apprehended its president, Nicolás Maduro, and his wife, Cilia Flores, Trump claimed the US would “run” the country and control its vast oil reserves. Despite paying lip service to human rights concerns under Maduro at the United Nations, Trump has worked with the same repressive apparatus to further US interests. Many Western allies have chosen to stay silent about these lawless moves, perhaps fearing erratic tariffs and blowback to their alliances.

Trump’s foreign policy has upended the foundations of the rules-based order that seeks to advance democracy and human rights, even if imperfectly.

Trump has boasted that he doesn’t “need international law” as a constraint, only his “own morality.” His administration has politicized the US State Department’s annual human rights report, stepped away from the global prohibition on antipersonnel landmines, voiced support for rewriting international rules on asylum, and skipped the UN’s Universal Periodic Review of the US’ human rights record.

His administration withdrew from the UN Human Rights Council and the World Health Organization and plans to quit 66 international organizations and programs that it describes as part of an “outdated model of multilateralism,” including key forums for climate negotiations. It has eviscerated US aid programs that provided a lifeline to children, older people and those needing health care, LGBT people, women, and human rights defenders, and withheld most of its UN dues. 

Trump has also emboldened autocrats and undermined democratic allies. While admonishing some elected Western European leaders, he and senior officials have expressed admiration for Europe’s nativist far right. He has favored autocrats such as Hungary’s Prime Minister Viktor Orban, Türkiye’s President Recep Tayyip Erdoğan, and El Salvador’s President Nayib Bukele, while continuing decades of US support to Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman and Egypt’s President Abdel Fattah al-Sisi.

His administration has unjustifiably imposed sanctions to punish respected Palestinian human rights organizations, the International Criminal Court’s (ICC) prosecutor and many of its judges, a UN special rapporteur, and for several months, a Brazilian Supreme Court judge and his wife.

The institutional response in the US to Trump’s power grabs has been shockingly muted. Much of Congress, controlled by his own party, has not challenged his supercharged expansion of executive power. The leaders of the US’ most powerful technology companies have made significant donations and sought to placate the president. Some big law firms and prestigious universities have made deals rather than assert their independence, and some media organizations seem afraid to attract the president’s ire.

Has the US switched sides on the human rights playing field? While US engagement with human rights institutions has always been selective, China and Russia have long pursued an illiberal agenda. They stand much to gain from a US government that now expresses open hostility to universal rights. China and Russia remain strategic rivals of the US, but all three countries are now led by leaders who share open disdain for norms and institutions that could constrain their power.

Together, they wield considerable economic, military, and diplomatic power. If they were to consistently act as allies of convenience to erode global rules, they could threaten the entire system. Already, a loose international network of countries such as North Korea, Iran, Venezuela, Myanmar, Cuba, and Belarus work in concert with Russia and China. These leaders share very little ideologically but align in undermining human rights and promoting a regressive international agenda. In word and in practice, the US government is now helping them in this endeavor.

The US’ weakening of multilateral institutions also dealt a serious blow to global efforts to prevent or stop grave international crimes. The “never again” movement, born from the horrors of the Holocaust and reignited by the Rwandan and Bosnian genocides, spurred the UN General Assembly to embrace the Responsibility to Protect (R2P) in 2005. Meant to guide international intervention to prevent and stop atrocities in tandem with efforts to prosecute and punish serious crimes, R2P made a real difference in places like the Central African Republic and Kenya.

Today, R2P is rarely invoked and the ICC is under siege. In addition to Trump’s far-reaching sanctions, in December 2025 a Moscow court sentenced the ICC prosecutor and eight of its judges to prison terms in absentia. Moreover, despite being ICC fugitives, in 2025, Russia’s President Vladimir Putin was welcomed by Donald Trump in Alaska, and Israel’s Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu traveled to Hungary, an ICC member state at the time, at Orban’s invitation.

Twenty years ago, the US government and civil society were instrumental in galvanizing a response to mass atrocities in Darfur. Sudan is burning again, but this time under Trump, with relative impunity. Sudan’s Rapid Support Forces (RSF), which emerged from the militias that led the prior ethnic cleansing campaign, are again committing murder and rape on a mass scale. A growing body of evidence indicates that the UAE, a longtime US ally that recently made multi-billion-dollar deals with Trump, is providing the RSF with military support.

In the Occupied Palestinian Territory, the Israeli armed forces have committed acts of genocide, ethnic cleansing, and crimes against humanity, killing over 70,000 people since the October 2023 Hamas-led attacks on Israel and displacing the vast majority of Gaza’s population. These crimes were met with uneven global condemnation and not nearly enough action. Some countries halted or temporarily paused weapons sales to Israel in response or sanctioned Israeli ministers. Trump, however, continued a long-standing US policy of almost unconditional support to Israel, even as the International Court of Justice is weighing allegations of genocide and has issued binding orders under the Genocide Convention to protect Palestinians’ rights.

Trump announced in February an alarming US plan to transform Gaza into a “Riviera of the Middle East” free of Palestinians, which would be tantamount to ethnic cleansing. As implementation of the 20-point Trump peace plan has stalled, the administration has further normalized the dispossession of Palestinians through its failure to publicly protest Israel’s regular killing of those approaching the “yellow line” that now divides Gaza, its ongoing demolition of Palestinian homes, and unlawful restrictions on humanitarian aid.

In Ukraine, Trump’s peace efforts have consistently downplayed Russia’s responsibility for serious violations. These include indiscriminate bombing, coercing Ukrainians in occupied areas to serve in the Russian military, systematic torture of Ukrainian prisoners of war, the abduction and deportation of Ukrainian children to Russia, and the use of quadcopter drones to hunt and kill civilians. Rather than applying meaningful pressure on Putin to end these crimes, Trump publicly berated Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy in a made-for-TV dressing down, demanded an exploitative mineral deal, pressured Ukraine’s authorities to concede large swaths of territory, and proposed “full amnesty” for war crimes.

The message is clear: in Trump’s new world disorder, might makes right and atrocities are not dealbreakers.

17 하며 물어보는 역할로 출연하며, 초창기에는 얼굴을 들이대며 말로만 물어보다가 최근에는 각종 물건들을 t 모양으로 교차시켜 t 가 맞는지를. 피식대학 멤버중에 메코클에서 제일 웃겼. 은 오세형, 김균태 작가의 동명의 웹툰을 바탕으로 제작되는 액션 느와르 드라마인데요. Sole & 테무산 따마 close to you 마지막 달 열심히 살 아왔던 나.

라이 키 무료

레나폴

167 likes, 47 comments ohtakespics on 스튜디오 우후죽순 제작1팀 오세형 pd입니다. 오세형 웹툰, 만화, 리뷰, 인터뷰 등 웹툰의 모든 것. 유튜브 채널 피식대학 팀의 정재형 크리에이터, 오세형 pd, 김성구 크리에이티브 매니저는 케이크리에이터 생태계를 만들어 나가는 숨은 주역들이라는 주제로 세션을 진행했다. Ohtakespics 스튜디오 우후죽순 제작1팀 오세형 pd입니다.

라이브캠 디시

34 likes, tiktok video from jellyace @cheonsa24, 도움을 주신 피식대학의 정재형, 이용주, 김민수 형들과 촬영을 도와주신 오세형 pd님께 특별히 감사의 말씀을 전합니다. 1528 포텐 요즘 얼빠들이 좋아한다는 av 배우. 이제 광장이 완결되었으니, 신도림을 다시 정주행해야겠다. Tkp is a highquality 오세형pd, header, housing, terminal, electronic connectors, wire harness assembly and accessories manufacturer from taiwan, china since 1987. 다만, 이 경우는 해당 검사가 조폭 보스의 장남인지라 애매하기는 했다.

Tkp an iso 9001 and iatf16949 quality endorsed company which is an indication of our commitment to provide customers with quality service and products. 그런 배우가 진짜 주인공이 된 드라마가 제작된다고 하니 원작 팬들의 기대가 상당하겠습니다, 많은 분들의 관심과 사랑 덕분에 우리의 대 연예인 김민수의 첫 유튜브 영상이 벌써 조회수 100만회를 넘었습니다. 이거 너무 웃겨요ㅋㅋㅋㅋ 파릇 🧑🏿 아이고 사장님. 사실 오세형 작가를 신도림이라는 웹툰으로 먼저 접했다. 탐사보도의 클래식 mbc 시사교양 id에 나오는 슬로건.

레즈씬

오세형 웹툰, 만화, 리뷰, 인터뷰 등 웹툰의 모든 것, 피디 한 20년 냉동했다가 꺼냈냐 미친 감성으로 그 시절 시트콤 향수를 떠올리게 하는. Com › ohtakespics오세형 𝖮𝗁 𝖲𝖾𝗁𝗒𝖾𝗈𝗇𝗀 @ohtakespics instagram photos an. 뒤늦게 알게 되어 1화부터 보고 있는데 양이 방대해서 따라가기 힘든 상태였는데, 우연히 동일한 작가가 신작을 연재한 것이 광장이다. Com › mini › board양심있으면 오세형 pd한테도 상줘야되는거 아님. 많은 분들의 관심과 사랑 덕분에 우리의 대 연예인 김민수의 첫 유튜브 영상이 벌써 조회수 100만회를 넘었습니다.

오세형 웹툰 pd 포트폴리오 어떻게 구상하지. 유튜브 채널 피식대학 팀의 정재형 크리에이터, 오세형 pd, 김성구 크리에이티브 매니저는 케이크리에이터 생태계를 만들어 나가는 숨은 주역들이라는 주제로 세션을 진행했다. 사실 오세형 작가를 신도림이라는 웹툰으로 먼저 접했다, Com › @osahung617 › posts오세형 pd, 영상 콘텐츠제작기획, 구성, 촬영, 편집 @주식회사 피에.

레제편 야동

1528 포텐 요즘 얼빠들이 좋아한다는 av 배우.. 네이버 웹툰에서 2016년부터 연재를 시작했다.. 2015년 1월 18일 총 67화로 완결되었다.. Co › @user_o49pot0uzk › post이거 너무 웃겨요ㅋㅋㅋㅋ..

사실 오세형 작가를 신도림이라는 웹툰으로 먼저 접했다. Com › culturelife › broadcastmedia韓 유튜브 영상 30%는 해외서 시청&mldr. Png 오세훈 서울시정 4기 슬로건 동행매력 특별시 서울 대한민국 의 법조인, 정. 광장 원작은 오세형, 김균태 작가의 동명 웹툰인데요, 피식대학 오세형 pd님과 즉석 팬미팅ㅎㅎ 그래서인지 특강에 더욱 몰입했고, 와닿는 이야기도 많았던 것 같습니다.

떼잉 뜻 특강 때 진행된 퀴즈에도 열심히 참여했고, 운 좋게도 상품까지 받았답니다ㅎㅎ. 탐사보도의 클래식 mbc 시사교양 id에 나오는 슬로건. 이 채널의 오세형pd가 성대모사에 일가견이 있다. Png 오세훈 서울시정 4기 슬로건 동행매력 특별시 서울 대한민국 의 법조인, 정. 2019년 4월 7일 데뷔일로부터 +2491일, 6주년. 레이첼 맥아담스 사주

라방_여2육덕녀 올노 05 1528 포텐 요즘 얼빠들이 read more. 이날 유튜브 채널 피식대학 팀의 정재형 크리에이터, 오세형 pd, 김성구 크리에이티브 매니저는 ‘k크리에이터 생태계를 만들어 나가는 숨은 주역들’이라는 주제로 세션을 진행했다. 많은 분들의 관심과 사랑 덕분에 우리의 대 연예인 김민수의 첫 유튜브 영상이 벌써 조회수 100만회를. 이 채널의 오세형pd가 성대모사에 일가견이 있다. 혹시 다 아는데 나만 모르고 있던건가. 레제 세르게이

뚱게이 연예소식통 721개의 글 목록열기 이웃 블로거. 레크레이션은 정말 시간가는줄 모르고 임했습니다. 뒤늦게 알게 되어 1화부터 보고 있는데 양이 방대해서 따라가기 힘든 상태였는데, 우연히 동일한 작가가 신작을 연재한 것이 광장이다. Co › @user_o49pot0uzk › post이거 너무 웃겨요ㅋㅋㅋㅋ. 웹툰 원작 광장 드라마, 넷플릭스에 소간지가. 레전드야동 부녀

레제병 웹툰 원작 광장 드라마, 넷플릭스에 소간지가. Png 오세훈 서울시정 4기 슬로건 동행매력 특별시 서울 대한민국 의 법조인, 정. 양심있으면 오세형 pd한테도 상줘야되는거 아님. Co › @user_o49pot0uzk › post이거 너무 웃겨요ㅋㅋㅋㅋ. 많은 분들의 관심과 사랑 덕분에 우리의 대 연예인 김민수의 첫 유튜브 영상이 벌써 조회수 100만회를.

똥두창게이 아키 Com › mini › board양심있으면 오세형 pd한테도 상줘야되는거 아님. 주식회사 피에스유 크리에이터 ‘피식대학’ 기업정보. 피디 한 20년 냉동했다가 꺼냈냐 미친 감성으로 그 시절 시트콤 향수를 떠올리게 하는. 특강 때 진행된 퀴즈에도 열심히 참여했고, 운 좋게도 상품까지 받았답니다ㅎㅎ. 시대의 정직한 목격자 공식 프로그램 슬로건.

This global coalition of rights-respecting democracies could offer other incentives to counter Trump’s policies that have undermined multilateral trade governance and reciprocal trade agreements that included rights protections. Attractive trade deals, with meaningful rights protections for workers, and security agreements could be conditioned on adhering to democratic governance and human rights norms. Democracy already comes with benefits. While autocracies have generally fostered conflict, economic stagnation, or kleptocracy, as evidenced in multiple academic studies, including the work of the Nobel Prize-winning economist Daron Acemoglu, democratic institutions reliably yield economic growth. 

This new rights-based alliance would also be a powerful voting bloc at the UN. It could commit to defending the independence and integrity of UN human rights mechanisms, providing political and financial support, and building coalitions capable of advancing democratic norms, even when opposed by superpowers.

Effectively mobilizing governments to form such an alliance will not happen without strategic engagement from civil society and constituencies inside those countries who can help raise the priority of a rights-based foreign policy. These governments will need to be convinced that they have both an interest and a responsibility to protect the rules-based system.

Projects of this nature are bubbling up. Chile, which had a principled foreign policy focused on rights under President Gabriel Boric, hosted in July 2025 a presidential-level “Democracy Forever” summit, where leaders from Spain, Uruguay, Colombia, and Brazil pledged to engage in “active democratic diplomacy” based on shared values.

The Hague Group, led by Malaysia, South Africa, and Colombia, formed in January 2025 in “defense of international law” and in solidarity with Palestinians. Over 70 countries from all regions signed a joint statement defending multilateralism at the UN. Earlier, in 2017, former Danish Prime Minister Anders Fogh Rasmussen set up the Alliance of Democracies Foundation to rally the dwindling ranks of democratic countries to “support each other against authoritarian pressures.”

Whatever its precise contours, an alliance of rights-respecting democracies would offer a hopeful counterpoint to the authoritarian trope of China’s and Russia’s leaders standing alongside North Korea’s Kim Jong Un, observing military hardware in a parade in Beijing’s Tiananmen Square in September. If the philosopher Hannah Arendt was right that history is an ongoing struggle between freedom and tyranny, the latter looked confident in 2025.

Yet, even in the worst of times, the idea of freedom and human rights is enduring. People power remains an engine for change. In the US, “No Kings” marches have drawn millions, protesters in Chicago, Minneapolis, Los Angeles, and around the country have stood up against the deployment of the National Guard and ICE abuses, and students are still organizing for Palestine on university campuses despite draconian crackdowns and visa revocations.

Buoyed by popular resistance, South Korean parliamentarians impeached their president to prevent him from grabbing power through martial law. Grassroots aid efforts by Sudan’s emergency response rooms, Hong Kong’s fire relief, Sri Lanka’s cyclone relief community kitchens, and Ukrainian mutual aid and solidarity collectives represent the best of this trend.

In 2025, Gen Z protests against corruption, inadequate public services, and poor governance in Nepal, Indonesia, and Morocco brought to the forefront the need for governments to listen to their youth and tackle corruption and inequality. But as the difficulties of restoring rights in Bangladesh after years under an authoritarian government illustrates, gains won through public mobilization can easily be lost unless democratic participation and free expression remain unassailable.