Will Human Rights Survive a Trumpian World?

Authoritarian Advances Threaten Rules-Based Order

The global human rights system is in peril. Under relentless pressure from US President Donald Trump, and persistently undermined by China and Russia, the rules-based international order is being crushed, threatening to take with it the architecture human rights defenders have come to rely on to advance norms and protect freedoms. To defy this trend, governments that still value human rights, alongside social movements, civil society, and international institutions, need to form a strategic alliance to push back.

To be fair, the downward spiral predated Trump’s reelection. The democratic wave that began over 50 years ago has given way to what scholars term a “democratic recession.” Democracy is now back to 1985 levels according to some metrics, with 72 percent of the world’s population now living under autocracy. Russia and China are less free today than 20 years ago. And so is the United States.

Of course, democracy is not a panacea for human rights violations; the US and other longtime democracies have their own histories of colonial crimes, racism, abusive justice systems, and wartime atrocities. More recently, authoritarian leaders have exploited public mistrust and anger to win elections and then dismantled the very institutions that brought them to power. Democratic institutions are crucial to represent the will of the people and keep power in check. It’s no surprise that whenever democracy is undermined, rights are too, as evident in recent years in India, Türkiye, the Philippines, El Salvador, and Hungary.

In this context, 2025 may be seen as a tipping point. In just 12 months, the Trump administration has carried out a broad assault on key pillars of US democracy and the global rules-based order, which the US, despite inconsistencies, was, with other states, instrumental in helping to establish.

In short order, Trump’s second-term administration has undermined trust in the sanctity of elections, reduced government accountability, gutted food assistance and healthcare subsidies, attacked judicial independence, defied court orders, rolled back women’s rights, obstructed access to abortion care, undermined remedies for racial harm, terminated programs mandating accessibility for people with disabilities, punished free speech, stripped protections from trans and intersex people, eroded privacy, and used government power to intimidate political opponents, the media, law firms, universities, civil society, and even comedians.

Claiming a risk of “civilizational erasure” in Europe and leaning on racist tropes to cast entire populations as unwelcome in the US, the Trump administration has embraced policies and rhetoric that align with white nationalist ideology. Immigrants and asylum seekers have been subjected to inhumane conditions and degrading treatment; 32 died in US Immigration and Customs Enforcement custody in 2025, and as of mid-January 2026, an additional 4 have died. Masked immigration enforcement agents have targeted people of color, using excessive force, terrorizing communities, wrongfully arresting scores of citizens, and, most recently, unjustifiably killing two people in Minneapolis, whose deaths Human Rights Watch has documented.

The US president of course has the authority to tighten US borders and enforce stricter immigration policies. The administration is not, however, entitled to deny legal process to asylum seekers, mistreat undocumented migrants, or unlawfully discriminate. In a well-functioning democracy, no electoral mandate should supersede domestic legislation, constitutional protections, or international human rights law. Trump’s team has repeatedly bypassed these guardrails.

The violations have not stopped at the border. The Trump administration used a 1798 law to send hundreds of Venezuelan migrants to an infamous prison in El Salvador, where they were tortured and sexually abused. Its blatantly unlawful strikes on boats in the Caribbean and the Pacific extrajudicially killed more than 120 people whom Trump claims were drug traffickers.

After the US attacked Venezuela and apprehended its president, Nicolás Maduro, and his wife, Cilia Flores, Trump claimed the US would “run” the country and control its vast oil reserves. Despite paying lip service to human rights concerns under Maduro at the United Nations, Trump has worked with the same repressive apparatus to further US interests. Many Western allies have chosen to stay silent about these lawless moves, perhaps fearing erratic tariffs and blowback to their alliances.

Trump’s foreign policy has upended the foundations of the rules-based order that seeks to advance democracy and human rights, even if imperfectly.

Trump has boasted that he doesn’t “need international law” as a constraint, only his “own morality.” His administration has politicized the US State Department’s annual human rights report, stepped away from the global prohibition on antipersonnel landmines, voiced support for rewriting international rules on asylum, and skipped the UN’s Universal Periodic Review of the US’ human rights record.

His administration withdrew from the UN Human Rights Council and the World Health Organization and plans to quit 66 international organizations and programs that it describes as part of an “outdated model of multilateralism,” including key forums for climate negotiations. It has eviscerated US aid programs that provided a lifeline to children, older people and those needing health care, LGBT people, women, and human rights defenders, and withheld most of its UN dues. 

Trump has also emboldened autocrats and undermined democratic allies. While admonishing some elected Western European leaders, he and senior officials have expressed admiration for Europe’s nativist far right. He has favored autocrats such as Hungary’s Prime Minister Viktor Orban, Türkiye’s President Recep Tayyip Erdoğan, and El Salvador’s President Nayib Bukele, while continuing decades of US support to Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman and Egypt’s President Abdel Fattah al-Sisi.

His administration has unjustifiably imposed sanctions to punish respected Palestinian human rights organizations, the International Criminal Court’s (ICC) prosecutor and many of its judges, a UN special rapporteur, and for several months, a Brazilian Supreme Court judge and his wife.

The institutional response in the US to Trump’s power grabs has been shockingly muted. Much of Congress, controlled by his own party, has not challenged his supercharged expansion of executive power. The leaders of the US’ most powerful technology companies have made significant donations and sought to placate the president. Some big law firms and prestigious universities have made deals rather than assert their independence, and some media organizations seem afraid to attract the president’s ire.

Has the US switched sides on the human rights playing field? While US engagement with human rights institutions has always been selective, China and Russia have long pursued an illiberal agenda. They stand much to gain from a US government that now expresses open hostility to universal rights. China and Russia remain strategic rivals of the US, but all three countries are now led by leaders who share open disdain for norms and institutions that could constrain their power.

Together, they wield considerable economic, military, and diplomatic power. If they were to consistently act as allies of convenience to erode global rules, they could threaten the entire system. Already, a loose international network of countries such as North Korea, Iran, Venezuela, Myanmar, Cuba, and Belarus work in concert with Russia and China. These leaders share very little ideologically but align in undermining human rights and promoting a regressive international agenda. In word and in practice, the US government is now helping them in this endeavor.

The US’ weakening of multilateral institutions also dealt a serious blow to global efforts to prevent or stop grave international crimes. The “never again” movement, born from the horrors of the Holocaust and reignited by the Rwandan and Bosnian genocides, spurred the UN General Assembly to embrace the Responsibility to Protect (R2P) in 2005. Meant to guide international intervention to prevent and stop atrocities in tandem with efforts to prosecute and punish serious crimes, R2P made a real difference in places like the Central African Republic and Kenya.

Today, R2P is rarely invoked and the ICC is under siege. In addition to Trump’s far-reaching sanctions, in December 2025 a Moscow court sentenced the ICC prosecutor and eight of its judges to prison terms in absentia. Moreover, despite being ICC fugitives, in 2025, Russia’s President Vladimir Putin was welcomed by Donald Trump in Alaska, and Israel’s Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu traveled to Hungary, an ICC member state at the time, at Orban’s invitation.

Twenty years ago, the US government and civil society were instrumental in galvanizing a response to mass atrocities in Darfur. Sudan is burning again, but this time under Trump, with relative impunity. Sudan’s Rapid Support Forces (RSF), which emerged from the militias that led the prior ethnic cleansing campaign, are again committing murder and rape on a mass scale. A growing body of evidence indicates that the UAE, a longtime US ally that recently made multi-billion-dollar deals with Trump, is providing the RSF with military support.

In the Occupied Palestinian Territory, the Israeli armed forces have committed acts of genocide, ethnic cleansing, and crimes against humanity, killing over 70,000 people since the October 2023 Hamas-led attacks on Israel and displacing the vast majority of Gaza’s population. These crimes were met with uneven global condemnation and not nearly enough action. Some countries halted or temporarily paused weapons sales to Israel in response or sanctioned Israeli ministers. Trump, however, continued a long-standing US policy of almost unconditional support to Israel, even as the International Court of Justice is weighing allegations of genocide and has issued binding orders under the Genocide Convention to protect Palestinians’ rights.

Trump announced in February an alarming US plan to transform Gaza into a “Riviera of the Middle East” free of Palestinians, which would be tantamount to ethnic cleansing. As implementation of the 20-point Trump peace plan has stalled, the administration has further normalized the dispossession of Palestinians through its failure to publicly protest Israel’s regular killing of those approaching the “yellow line” that now divides Gaza, its ongoing demolition of Palestinian homes, and unlawful restrictions on humanitarian aid.

In Ukraine, Trump’s peace efforts have consistently downplayed Russia’s responsibility for serious violations. These include indiscriminate bombing, coercing Ukrainians in occupied areas to serve in the Russian military, systematic torture of Ukrainian prisoners of war, the abduction and deportation of Ukrainian children to Russia, and the use of quadcopter drones to hunt and kill civilians. Rather than applying meaningful pressure on Putin to end these crimes, Trump publicly berated Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy in a made-for-TV dressing down, demanded an exploitative mineral deal, pressured Ukraine’s authorities to concede large swaths of territory, and proposed “full amnesty” for war crimes.

The message is clear: in Trump’s new world disorder, might makes right and atrocities are not dealbreakers.

어떤 사람이 있고 그런 사람들의 특징은 무엇일까요. 남자를 아주 잘 알아서 남자 조련을 잘 함반면 가장 둔하게 느껴지는 여자는관성이 1개인데 설이 심한 인다관설여자. 남자들이 안달날 수밖에 없는 곰같은 여자들의 매력feat. 여우같은여자보다 더 능구렁이같은 남자를 조심해야댐 ㅋㅋ.

약한남자 디시

카미의 생각은 매 주 두편의 영상이 업로드 됩니다. 제 주위에 저런 타입을 본적이 없어서 좀 처음엔 당황스러웠는데 예전 만났던. 여우 같은 여자는 곰 같은 여자보다 자신의 감정 표현이 대체로 명확하다. 해석 남여 남자의심리 전 남자고요 심심한데 제가 만난 여우같은 여자들을 분석해봄 ㅎㅎㅎ 1.

에망 발

남자를 아주 잘 알아서 남자 조련을 잘 함반면 가장 둔하게 느껴지는 여자는관성이 1개인데 설이 심한 인다관설여자, 여자가 남자에게 매달릴 때 남자는 곧 자신이 그녀를 100% 장악했다는 걸 알게 된다, 2120 url 복사 이웃추가 존재하지 않는 이미지입니다.

아린 ෆ 에 자신의 이름이나 별명을 넣어주세요. 일단 ㅍㅁ들은 외모가 빻았다어느 정도냐면 그대학 정도가 평균이다그래서 남자에게 선택을 받지 못한다또한 특유의 존심이 있, 여우같은 남자의 특징에는 어떤 것이 있을까요, 일단 ㅍㅁ들은 외모가 빻았다어느 정도냐면 그대학 정도가 평균이다그래서 남자에게 선택을 받지 못한다또한 특유의 존심이 있, 남녀불문 인간관계에서 이런 인간들만 피해다녀도 인생퐁퐁 안당한다 반드시 구별하고 복습해라 곰이라고 반드시 좋은뜻인것이 아니고 여우라고. Jpgif 28,885 69 무명의 더쿠 stheqoo.

남자를 아주 잘 알아서 남자 조련을 잘 함반면 가장 둔하게 느껴지는 여자는관성이 1개인데 설이 심한 인다관설여자. 똑같은 외적조건이면 여자 경험적고 순한남자보단여자 경험많고 재밌게해주는 도파민남자를 원하지않나. 내 남친인데 내말하나하나 크게 반은해주고 리액션도 좋고 항상 고맙네. 나랑 비슷한 사람 만나고 싶다 남자친구 있는데 선 광고 듀라셀 오리지널 aaa 건전지 듀× 가입한지 세달정도 지났는데 atm기라고 생각하고 결혼할까. 2120 url 복사 이웃추가 존재하지 않는 이미지입니다, 이런 여성들은 대체로 남자들뿐만 아니라 여성들에게도 인기가 좋다.

남자를 아주 잘 알아서 남자 조련을 잘 함반면 가장 둔하게 느껴지는 여자는관성이 1개인데 설이 심한 인다관설여자, Ai 이미지 간편 등록new 진짜 여우같은 년 알려줌 앰생찐따녀 125. 대평원늑대와 같은 아종으로 보기도 한다.

엔쥬 결혼

남자들은 왜 ‘여우 같은 여자’에 끌릴까.. 남녀불문 인간관계에서 이런 인간들만 피해다녀도 인생퐁퐁 안당한다 반드시 구별하고 복습해라 곰이라고 반드시 좋은뜻인것이 아니고 여우라고..

역학 설정 new 연관 글쓰기 차단 설정 머리말∙꼬리말 설정 ai 이미지 간편 등록new 진짜 여우같은 년 알려줌 앰생찐따녀 125. 편인, 사주 편인, 편인 사주, 일지 편인, 월지 편인, 편인 보는 법안녕하세요사주팔자 쉽게 풀어주는 남자, 도화도르 입니다 오늘 말씀드릴 편인은 사고 활동과 밀접한 관련이 있어서현대 사회에서 자신만의 전문성과 능력을 갖추는 데꼭 필요한 십성이라고 볼 수 있습니다. 남자들이 안달날 수밖에 없는 곰같은 여자들의 매력feat.

야쓰가케 우미 여우같은 여자 영리하여 남자가 좋아하는 행동을 잘한다. 책 남자들은 왜 여우같은 여자를 좋아할까. 내 남친인데 내말하나하나 크게 반은해주고 리액션도 좋고 항상 고맙네. 여자가 남자에게 매달릴 때 남자는 곧 자신이 그녀를 100% 장악했다는 걸 알게 된다. 여우 같은 여자는 곰 같은 여자보다 자신의 감정 표현이 대체로 명확하다. 야오요로즈 모모 짤

에미카 여자들 경험많은 여우같은 남자 좋아하는거아녔음. 남자친구가 연락이 되지 않았을 때 여우같은 여자는 이것을 재촉하지 않습니다. Com › board › divination_new1진짜 여우같은 년 알려줌 역학 갤러리. 내 남친인데 내말하나하나 크게 반은해주고 리액션도 좋고 항상 고맙네. 곧 결혼약속을 한 남자친구가 딱 저래요. 엘멘초

어려진 기유 근데 그딴거 상관없이 모든 여자에게 웃음과 매너가 기본적으로 베어 있음. 여우같은 여자 영리하여 남자가 좋아하는 행동을 잘한다. ☞ 당당한 여우로 불리면 성공했다는 증거이고, 남자들이 쫓아다니는 여자이다. 여기서 곰같은 여자여우같은 여자는 어떤 여자들을 지칭하는거야. 여기서 곰같은 여자여우같은 여자는 어떤 여자들을 지칭하는거야. 엘라 팬 트리

엘사 남친 근데 그딴거 상관없이 모든 여자에게 웃음과. 끼부리고 대놓고 여우짓하는건 아닌데 줄듯말듯 아슬아슬한 여우같은 여자. 이슈 생각보다 수요 높은 여우상 남자 연예인들. 남자들 개중에 여우같은놈들은 200606202109 역학 갤러리. 대체적으로 여우같은 여자는 성격이 매우 밝습니다.

에페이오스 디시 이런 여성들은 대체로 남자들뿐만 아니라 여성들에게도 인기가 좋다. 연애를 할 때 굉장히 지혜롭게 잘 이끌어간답니다. 대평원늑대와 같은 아종으로 보기도 한다. 매력적인 훈남 온유완은 생김새에 걸맞는 바람둥이. 사람들 앞에서 남자의 기를 확실히 세워줄줄 알며, 이해력이나 포용력도 넓습니다.

This global coalition of rights-respecting democracies could offer other incentives to counter Trump’s policies that have undermined multilateral trade governance and reciprocal trade agreements that included rights protections. Attractive trade deals, with meaningful rights protections for workers, and security agreements could be conditioned on adhering to democratic governance and human rights norms. Democracy already comes with benefits. While autocracies have generally fostered conflict, economic stagnation, or kleptocracy, as evidenced in multiple academic studies, including the work of the Nobel Prize-winning economist Daron Acemoglu, democratic institutions reliably yield economic growth. 

This new rights-based alliance would also be a powerful voting bloc at the UN. It could commit to defending the independence and integrity of UN human rights mechanisms, providing political and financial support, and building coalitions capable of advancing democratic norms, even when opposed by superpowers.

Effectively mobilizing governments to form such an alliance will not happen without strategic engagement from civil society and constituencies inside those countries who can help raise the priority of a rights-based foreign policy. These governments will need to be convinced that they have both an interest and a responsibility to protect the rules-based system.

Projects of this nature are bubbling up. Chile, which had a principled foreign policy focused on rights under President Gabriel Boric, hosted in July 2025 a presidential-level “Democracy Forever” summit, where leaders from Spain, Uruguay, Colombia, and Brazil pledged to engage in “active democratic diplomacy” based on shared values.

The Hague Group, led by Malaysia, South Africa, and Colombia, formed in January 2025 in “defense of international law” and in solidarity with Palestinians. Over 70 countries from all regions signed a joint statement defending multilateralism at the UN. Earlier, in 2017, former Danish Prime Minister Anders Fogh Rasmussen set up the Alliance of Democracies Foundation to rally the dwindling ranks of democratic countries to “support each other against authoritarian pressures.”

Whatever its precise contours, an alliance of rights-respecting democracies would offer a hopeful counterpoint to the authoritarian trope of China’s and Russia’s leaders standing alongside North Korea’s Kim Jong Un, observing military hardware in a parade in Beijing’s Tiananmen Square in September. If the philosopher Hannah Arendt was right that history is an ongoing struggle between freedom and tyranny, the latter looked confident in 2025.

Yet, even in the worst of times, the idea of freedom and human rights is enduring. People power remains an engine for change. In the US, “No Kings” marches have drawn millions, protesters in Chicago, Minneapolis, Los Angeles, and around the country have stood up against the deployment of the National Guard and ICE abuses, and students are still organizing for Palestine on university campuses despite draconian crackdowns and visa revocations.

Buoyed by popular resistance, South Korean parliamentarians impeached their president to prevent him from grabbing power through martial law. Grassroots aid efforts by Sudan’s emergency response rooms, Hong Kong’s fire relief, Sri Lanka’s cyclone relief community kitchens, and Ukrainian mutual aid and solidarity collectives represent the best of this trend.

In 2025, Gen Z protests against corruption, inadequate public services, and poor governance in Nepal, Indonesia, and Morocco brought to the forefront the need for governments to listen to their youth and tackle corruption and inequality. But as the difficulties of restoring rights in Bangladesh after years under an authoritarian government illustrates, gains won through public mobilization can easily be lost unless democratic participation and free expression remain unassailable.