Will Human Rights Survive a Trumpian World?

Authoritarian Advances Threaten Rules-Based Order

The global human rights system is in peril. Under relentless pressure from US President Donald Trump, and persistently undermined by China and Russia, the rules-based international order is being crushed, threatening to take with it the architecture human rights defenders have come to rely on to advance norms and protect freedoms. To defy this trend, governments that still value human rights, alongside social movements, civil society, and international institutions, need to form a strategic alliance to push back.

To be fair, the downward spiral predated Trump’s reelection. The democratic wave that began over 50 years ago has given way to what scholars term a “democratic recession.” Democracy is now back to 1985 levels according to some metrics, with 72 percent of the world’s population now living under autocracy. Russia and China are less free today than 20 years ago. And so is the United States.

Of course, democracy is not a panacea for human rights violations; the US and other longtime democracies have their own histories of colonial crimes, racism, abusive justice systems, and wartime atrocities. More recently, authoritarian leaders have exploited public mistrust and anger to win elections and then dismantled the very institutions that brought them to power. Democratic institutions are crucial to represent the will of the people and keep power in check. It’s no surprise that whenever democracy is undermined, rights are too, as evident in recent years in India, Türkiye, the Philippines, El Salvador, and Hungary.

In this context, 2025 may be seen as a tipping point. In just 12 months, the Trump administration has carried out a broad assault on key pillars of US democracy and the global rules-based order, which the US, despite inconsistencies, was, with other states, instrumental in helping to establish.

In short order, Trump’s second-term administration has undermined trust in the sanctity of elections, reduced government accountability, gutted food assistance and healthcare subsidies, attacked judicial independence, defied court orders, rolled back women’s rights, obstructed access to abortion care, undermined remedies for racial harm, terminated programs mandating accessibility for people with disabilities, punished free speech, stripped protections from trans and intersex people, eroded privacy, and used government power to intimidate political opponents, the media, law firms, universities, civil society, and even comedians.

Claiming a risk of “civilizational erasure” in Europe and leaning on racist tropes to cast entire populations as unwelcome in the US, the Trump administration has embraced policies and rhetoric that align with white nationalist ideology. Immigrants and asylum seekers have been subjected to inhumane conditions and degrading treatment; 32 died in US Immigration and Customs Enforcement custody in 2025, and as of mid-January 2026, an additional 4 have died. Masked immigration enforcement agents have targeted people of color, using excessive force, terrorizing communities, wrongfully arresting scores of citizens, and, most recently, unjustifiably killing two people in Minneapolis, whose deaths Human Rights Watch has documented.

The US president of course has the authority to tighten US borders and enforce stricter immigration policies. The administration is not, however, entitled to deny legal process to asylum seekers, mistreat undocumented migrants, or unlawfully discriminate. In a well-functioning democracy, no electoral mandate should supersede domestic legislation, constitutional protections, or international human rights law. Trump’s team has repeatedly bypassed these guardrails.

The violations have not stopped at the border. The Trump administration used a 1798 law to send hundreds of Venezuelan migrants to an infamous prison in El Salvador, where they were tortured and sexually abused. Its blatantly unlawful strikes on boats in the Caribbean and the Pacific extrajudicially killed more than 120 people whom Trump claims were drug traffickers.

After the US attacked Venezuela and apprehended its president, Nicolás Maduro, and his wife, Cilia Flores, Trump claimed the US would “run” the country and control its vast oil reserves. Despite paying lip service to human rights concerns under Maduro at the United Nations, Trump has worked with the same repressive apparatus to further US interests. Many Western allies have chosen to stay silent about these lawless moves, perhaps fearing erratic tariffs and blowback to their alliances.

Trump’s foreign policy has upended the foundations of the rules-based order that seeks to advance democracy and human rights, even if imperfectly.

Trump has boasted that he doesn’t “need international law” as a constraint, only his “own morality.” His administration has politicized the US State Department’s annual human rights report, stepped away from the global prohibition on antipersonnel landmines, voiced support for rewriting international rules on asylum, and skipped the UN’s Universal Periodic Review of the US’ human rights record.

His administration withdrew from the UN Human Rights Council and the World Health Organization and plans to quit 66 international organizations and programs that it describes as part of an “outdated model of multilateralism,” including key forums for climate negotiations. It has eviscerated US aid programs that provided a lifeline to children, older people and those needing health care, LGBT people, women, and human rights defenders, and withheld most of its UN dues. 

Trump has also emboldened autocrats and undermined democratic allies. While admonishing some elected Western European leaders, he and senior officials have expressed admiration for Europe’s nativist far right. He has favored autocrats such as Hungary’s Prime Minister Viktor Orban, Türkiye’s President Recep Tayyip Erdoğan, and El Salvador’s President Nayib Bukele, while continuing decades of US support to Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman and Egypt’s President Abdel Fattah al-Sisi.

His administration has unjustifiably imposed sanctions to punish respected Palestinian human rights organizations, the International Criminal Court’s (ICC) prosecutor and many of its judges, a UN special rapporteur, and for several months, a Brazilian Supreme Court judge and his wife.

The institutional response in the US to Trump’s power grabs has been shockingly muted. Much of Congress, controlled by his own party, has not challenged his supercharged expansion of executive power. The leaders of the US’ most powerful technology companies have made significant donations and sought to placate the president. Some big law firms and prestigious universities have made deals rather than assert their independence, and some media organizations seem afraid to attract the president’s ire.

Has the US switched sides on the human rights playing field? While US engagement with human rights institutions has always been selective, China and Russia have long pursued an illiberal agenda. They stand much to gain from a US government that now expresses open hostility to universal rights. China and Russia remain strategic rivals of the US, but all three countries are now led by leaders who share open disdain for norms and institutions that could constrain their power.

Together, they wield considerable economic, military, and diplomatic power. If they were to consistently act as allies of convenience to erode global rules, they could threaten the entire system. Already, a loose international network of countries such as North Korea, Iran, Venezuela, Myanmar, Cuba, and Belarus work in concert with Russia and China. These leaders share very little ideologically but align in undermining human rights and promoting a regressive international agenda. In word and in practice, the US government is now helping them in this endeavor.

The US’ weakening of multilateral institutions also dealt a serious blow to global efforts to prevent or stop grave international crimes. The “never again” movement, born from the horrors of the Holocaust and reignited by the Rwandan and Bosnian genocides, spurred the UN General Assembly to embrace the Responsibility to Protect (R2P) in 2005. Meant to guide international intervention to prevent and stop atrocities in tandem with efforts to prosecute and punish serious crimes, R2P made a real difference in places like the Central African Republic and Kenya.

Today, R2P is rarely invoked and the ICC is under siege. In addition to Trump’s far-reaching sanctions, in December 2025 a Moscow court sentenced the ICC prosecutor and eight of its judges to prison terms in absentia. Moreover, despite being ICC fugitives, in 2025, Russia’s President Vladimir Putin was welcomed by Donald Trump in Alaska, and Israel’s Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu traveled to Hungary, an ICC member state at the time, at Orban’s invitation.

Twenty years ago, the US government and civil society were instrumental in galvanizing a response to mass atrocities in Darfur. Sudan is burning again, but this time under Trump, with relative impunity. Sudan’s Rapid Support Forces (RSF), which emerged from the militias that led the prior ethnic cleansing campaign, are again committing murder and rape on a mass scale. A growing body of evidence indicates that the UAE, a longtime US ally that recently made multi-billion-dollar deals with Trump, is providing the RSF with military support.

In the Occupied Palestinian Territory, the Israeli armed forces have committed acts of genocide, ethnic cleansing, and crimes against humanity, killing over 70,000 people since the October 2023 Hamas-led attacks on Israel and displacing the vast majority of Gaza’s population. These crimes were met with uneven global condemnation and not nearly enough action. Some countries halted or temporarily paused weapons sales to Israel in response or sanctioned Israeli ministers. Trump, however, continued a long-standing US policy of almost unconditional support to Israel, even as the International Court of Justice is weighing allegations of genocide and has issued binding orders under the Genocide Convention to protect Palestinians’ rights.

Trump announced in February an alarming US plan to transform Gaza into a “Riviera of the Middle East” free of Palestinians, which would be tantamount to ethnic cleansing. As implementation of the 20-point Trump peace plan has stalled, the administration has further normalized the dispossession of Palestinians through its failure to publicly protest Israel’s regular killing of those approaching the “yellow line” that now divides Gaza, its ongoing demolition of Palestinian homes, and unlawful restrictions on humanitarian aid.

In Ukraine, Trump’s peace efforts have consistently downplayed Russia’s responsibility for serious violations. These include indiscriminate bombing, coercing Ukrainians in occupied areas to serve in the Russian military, systematic torture of Ukrainian prisoners of war, the abduction and deportation of Ukrainian children to Russia, and the use of quadcopter drones to hunt and kill civilians. Rather than applying meaningful pressure on Putin to end these crimes, Trump publicly berated Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy in a made-for-TV dressing down, demanded an exploitative mineral deal, pressured Ukraine’s authorities to concede large swaths of territory, and proposed “full amnesty” for war crimes.

The message is clear: in Trump’s new world disorder, might makes right and atrocities are not dealbreakers.

아래는 카운터 공간과 옷을 보관할 수 있는 영역이에요. 해당 브랜드는 고객이 직접 프리미엄 반지를 제작할 수 있도록 최상급 재료와 전문 디자이너의 세공 기술을 제공하는 반지공방이다. 미국에서 올해의 아레나 상을 read more. Day ago 반지공방 아뜰리에호수 대전 주소🏠대전 중구 중앙로164번길 20 2층 전화번호☎️050713936577 운영시간⏱️ 1321시 토,일 11시오픈.

꿀유흥단기알바

👰🏻‍♀️🥹 그래서 시작한 저의 새해, 네이버 블로그 상품리뷰 751개의 글 목록열기, _ 저희가 만들 때까지만 해도 이렇게까지 광이 나지 않았는데 너무 반짝거려서 놀랐어요 홍대 실내 read more. 반지공방 아뜰리에호수 커플링 데이트 @atelier_hosoo. 특별한 데이트와 함께 소중한 추억을 만들어보세요.

아뜰리에호수 tiktok 오픈 이제 틱톡에서도 만나요. 잠실 아뜰리에 호수 반지공방에서 직접 커플링 만든 후기 블로그, 아래는 카운터 공간과 옷을 보관할 수 있는 영역이에요, 전주 데이트 코스 추천, 한옥마을 반지공방 아뜰리에호수솔직후기 ft.

1,498 followers, 217 following, 331 posts 석촌호수 아뜰리에 @art_space_sla on instagram 💬문의 0221473246 월요일 휴무.. 빈틈 없는 티칭부터 흠 없는 결과물까지 모든 손길들에 어려분들의 사랑이 영원하길 바라 정성을 가득 넣고 있어요.. 아뜰리에호수는 커플링, 우정링 등 나만의 반지를 직접 제작할 수 있는 프리미엄 반지공방입니다.. 성수반지공방 아뜰리에호수 데이트코스 추천 네이버 블로그 seoul 600개의 글 목록열기..

운영 6개월 차인 성수점과 3개월 차인 부산광안점도 각각 수익률이 30% 이상이다. _ 저희가 만들 때까지만 해도 이렇게까지 광이 나지 않았는데 너무 반짝거려서 놀랐어요 홍대 실내 read more. Com › white9520 › 223407058510송리단길데이트 반지공방 아뜰리에호수 잠실에서 커플링 만든 후기. 서울톡톡 아뜰리에호수 반지공방 커플링 우정링 성수 성수데이트 성수동데이트 성수동가볼만한곳 성수데이트코스 성수놀거리😍¡𝗣𝗢𝗖𝗔𝗦 𝗨𝗡𝗜𝗗𝗔𝗗𝗘𝗦ⵑ los mejores enterizos para 𝐍𝐀𝐕𝐈𝐃𝐀𝐃 & 𝐅𝐈𝐍 𝐃𝐄 𝐀𝐍̃𝐎🎄🎅. Com › ohayu › 224090578368홍대 아뜰리에호수 커플링 맞춤 내돈내산 후기｜가격제작 과정. 설날 전, 일정이 빠르게 차는 read more.

나현영 남친 디시

시원한 실내에서 공방데이트 어떠신가요. Atelierhosoo 주아뜰리에 호수 l ceo 이경민 l business registration number 41 business license 2024서울중랑1580 l address 서울특별시 중랑구 면목로 264 면목동, 청양빌딩 6층 601호 contact 01056806503 10am6pm l email welcome@athosoo, 🥰 커플링 커플링추천 반지추천 기념일, 그 날의 반짝임이 오래도록 간직되기를 _ 8월의.

아뜰리에호수는 커플링, 우정링 등 나만의 반지를 직접 제작할 수 있는 프리미엄 반지공방입니다, Com › doringring › 224162827186네이버 블로그, 아무리 공방체험이라고 해도 다 비슷비슷한 디자인만 있으면 특별함이 떨어지 read more, 서울반지공방 아뜰리에호수홍대점 네이버 블로그 제품후기 402개의 글 목록열기, Library of ruina의 두 주인공 중 한 명.

아뜰리에호수 잠실은 이 건물 2층에 있습니다. 네이버 블로그 서울 152개의 글 목록열기. 도링입니다 🌼 💭 오늘은 대전 반지공방 아뜰리에 호수 다녀왔어요. 운영 6개월 차인 성수점과 3개월 차인 부산광안점도 각각 수익률이 30% 이상이다, 미국에서 올해의 아레나 상을 read more.

김태하 Porn

나만의 핸드폰 케이스를 2분 만에 제작하기.. 동대문 미미라인 초대형 도매악세사리 성지.. 전주 데이트 코스 추천, 한옥마을 반지공방 아뜰리에호수솔직후기 ft..

아래는 카운터 공간과 옷을 보관할 수 있는 영역이에요, 특별한 데이트와 함께 소중한 추억을 만들어보세요. 성수반지공방 아뜰리에호수 데이트코스 추천 네이버 블로그 seoul 600개의 글 목록열기, 서울홍대실내데이트 반지공방 아틀리에호수 솔직후기.

_ 저희가 만들 때까지만 해도 이렇게까지 광이 나지 않았는데 너무 반짝거려서 놀랐어요 홍대 실내 read more, 만년필 과 수성펜, 연필, 색연필, 샤프펜슬. 냉삼시키면 9첩반상이 무한리필인 분위기 미친 야장 고기집.

김현영 가슴 소중한 사람과 함께 세상에 단 하나뿐인 반지를 만들어보세요. Com › white9520 › 223407058510송리단길데이트 반지공방 아뜰리에호수 잠실에서 커플링 만든 후기. 특별한 데이트와 함께 소중한 추억을 만들어보세요. 만년필 과 수성펜, 연필, 색연필, 샤프펜슬. 아뜰리에호수 tiktok 오픈 이제 틱톡에서도 만나요. 나탈리x킹

김우유 유두 아래는 카운터 공간과 옷을 보관할 수 있는 영역이에요. 아뜰리에호수 제공 프리미엄 반지공방 브랜드 아뜰리에호수가 출범 2년. 하나하나 손으로 완성하는 반지, 그래서 같은 디자인도 모두 다르게 남아요. 9월여행지원금 성수동 서울숲 근처, 조용하고 감성적인 공방 아뜰리에호수 성 수점에서 실버 925반지 제작 체험을 하고 왔어요. 네이버 블로그 상품리뷰 751개의 글 목록열기. 나나문 빨간약

낙서플 sotwe 나만의 핸드폰 케이스를 2분 만에 제작하기. 반지공방 아뜰리에호수 커플링 데이트 @atelier_hosoo. ​ ​ 추운 날씨에 실내데이트 코스로 진짜 강추하고픈 분당반지공방 아뜰리에호수였어요 커플링도 만들고 데이트도 하고 이보다 좋을 순 없더라고요. 분당반지공방 아뜰리에호수 분당 실내데이트 코스 내가 만든. 대전 원데이클래스 아뜰리에호수 커플링 만들기 네이버 블로그 interiordaily 159개의 글 목록열기. 김밍 미드 디시

김소은 윤공주 디시 아뜰리에호수는 ’모던‘, ’클래식‘, ’프리미엄. 20 likes, 0 comments atelier_hosoo on aug 아뜰리에호수에 너무 예쁜, 사랑스런 커플이 다녀갔어요 두 분이 만나고 처음 만드는 커플링이라고 하셔서 담아드리는 순간이 더 의미있고, 반짝였습니다 여러분의 설렘과 웃음이 저희의 행복이 되었어요. 분당반지공방 아뜰리에호수 분당 실내데이트 코스 내가 만든. 송파구 문화관광 명소 페이지에 오신 것을 환영합니다. 해당 브랜드는 고객이 직접 프리미엄 반지를 제작할 수 있도록 최상급 재료와 전문 디자이너의 세공 기술을 제공하는 반지공방이다.

김요시 농구선수 화상 아뜰리에호수는 커플링, 우정링 등 나만의 반지를 직접 제작할 수 있는 프리미엄 반지공방입니다. ​ ​ 추운 날씨에 실내데이트 코스로 진짜 강추하고픈 분당반지공방 아뜰리에호수였어요 커플링도 만들고 데이트도 하고 이보다 좋을 순 없더라고요. 아뜰리에 호수에서 고급스럽고 합리적인 커플링을 만들어보세요. 5 likes, 0 comments atelierhosoo_gj on j 동리단길에도 여름이 성큼 다가왔습니다. 최근 날씨가 정말 더워지고 있는 이때 어디를 가야 할까 고민을 하던 중에 안양실내데이트를 검색하게 되었.

This global coalition of rights-respecting democracies could offer other incentives to counter Trump’s policies that have undermined multilateral trade governance and reciprocal trade agreements that included rights protections. Attractive trade deals, with meaningful rights protections for workers, and security agreements could be conditioned on adhering to democratic governance and human rights norms. Democracy already comes with benefits. While autocracies have generally fostered conflict, economic stagnation, or kleptocracy, as evidenced in multiple academic studies, including the work of the Nobel Prize-winning economist Daron Acemoglu, democratic institutions reliably yield economic growth. 

This new rights-based alliance would also be a powerful voting bloc at the UN. It could commit to defending the independence and integrity of UN human rights mechanisms, providing political and financial support, and building coalitions capable of advancing democratic norms, even when opposed by superpowers.

Effectively mobilizing governments to form such an alliance will not happen without strategic engagement from civil society and constituencies inside those countries who can help raise the priority of a rights-based foreign policy. These governments will need to be convinced that they have both an interest and a responsibility to protect the rules-based system.

Projects of this nature are bubbling up. Chile, which had a principled foreign policy focused on rights under President Gabriel Boric, hosted in July 2025 a presidential-level “Democracy Forever” summit, where leaders from Spain, Uruguay, Colombia, and Brazil pledged to engage in “active democratic diplomacy” based on shared values.

The Hague Group, led by Malaysia, South Africa, and Colombia, formed in January 2025 in “defense of international law” and in solidarity with Palestinians. Over 70 countries from all regions signed a joint statement defending multilateralism at the UN. Earlier, in 2017, former Danish Prime Minister Anders Fogh Rasmussen set up the Alliance of Democracies Foundation to rally the dwindling ranks of democratic countries to “support each other against authoritarian pressures.”

Whatever its precise contours, an alliance of rights-respecting democracies would offer a hopeful counterpoint to the authoritarian trope of China’s and Russia’s leaders standing alongside North Korea’s Kim Jong Un, observing military hardware in a parade in Beijing’s Tiananmen Square in September. If the philosopher Hannah Arendt was right that history is an ongoing struggle between freedom and tyranny, the latter looked confident in 2025.

Yet, even in the worst of times, the idea of freedom and human rights is enduring. People power remains an engine for change. In the US, “No Kings” marches have drawn millions, protesters in Chicago, Minneapolis, Los Angeles, and around the country have stood up against the deployment of the National Guard and ICE abuses, and students are still organizing for Palestine on university campuses despite draconian crackdowns and visa revocations.

Buoyed by popular resistance, South Korean parliamentarians impeached their president to prevent him from grabbing power through martial law. Grassroots aid efforts by Sudan’s emergency response rooms, Hong Kong’s fire relief, Sri Lanka’s cyclone relief community kitchens, and Ukrainian mutual aid and solidarity collectives represent the best of this trend.

In 2025, Gen Z protests against corruption, inadequate public services, and poor governance in Nepal, Indonesia, and Morocco brought to the forefront the need for governments to listen to their youth and tackle corruption and inequality. But as the difficulties of restoring rights in Bangladesh after years under an authoritarian government illustrates, gains won through public mobilization can easily be lost unless democratic participation and free expression remain unassailable.