Will Human Rights Survive a Trumpian World?

Authoritarian Advances Threaten Rules-Based Order

The global human rights system is in peril. Under relentless pressure from US President Donald Trump, and persistently undermined by China and Russia, the rules-based international order is being crushed, threatening to take with it the architecture human rights defenders have come to rely on to advance norms and protect freedoms. To defy this trend, governments that still value human rights, alongside social movements, civil society, and international institutions, need to form a strategic alliance to push back.

To be fair, the downward spiral predated Trump’s reelection. The democratic wave that began over 50 years ago has given way to what scholars term a “democratic recession.” Democracy is now back to 1985 levels according to some metrics, with 72 percent of the world’s population now living under autocracy. Russia and China are less free today than 20 years ago. And so is the United States.

Of course, democracy is not a panacea for human rights violations; the US and other longtime democracies have their own histories of colonial crimes, racism, abusive justice systems, and wartime atrocities. More recently, authoritarian leaders have exploited public mistrust and anger to win elections and then dismantled the very institutions that brought them to power. Democratic institutions are crucial to represent the will of the people and keep power in check. It’s no surprise that whenever democracy is undermined, rights are too, as evident in recent years in India, Türkiye, the Philippines, El Salvador, and Hungary.

In this context, 2025 may be seen as a tipping point. In just 12 months, the Trump administration has carried out a broad assault on key pillars of US democracy and the global rules-based order, which the US, despite inconsistencies, was, with other states, instrumental in helping to establish.

In short order, Trump’s second-term administration has undermined trust in the sanctity of elections, reduced government accountability, gutted food assistance and healthcare subsidies, attacked judicial independence, defied court orders, rolled back women’s rights, obstructed access to abortion care, undermined remedies for racial harm, terminated programs mandating accessibility for people with disabilities, punished free speech, stripped protections from trans and intersex people, eroded privacy, and used government power to intimidate political opponents, the media, law firms, universities, civil society, and even comedians.

Claiming a risk of “civilizational erasure” in Europe and leaning on racist tropes to cast entire populations as unwelcome in the US, the Trump administration has embraced policies and rhetoric that align with white nationalist ideology. Immigrants and asylum seekers have been subjected to inhumane conditions and degrading treatment; 32 died in US Immigration and Customs Enforcement custody in 2025, and as of mid-January 2026, an additional 4 have died. Masked immigration enforcement agents have targeted people of color, using excessive force, terrorizing communities, wrongfully arresting scores of citizens, and, most recently, unjustifiably killing two people in Minneapolis, whose deaths Human Rights Watch has documented.

The US president of course has the authority to tighten US borders and enforce stricter immigration policies. The administration is not, however, entitled to deny legal process to asylum seekers, mistreat undocumented migrants, or unlawfully discriminate. In a well-functioning democracy, no electoral mandate should supersede domestic legislation, constitutional protections, or international human rights law. Trump’s team has repeatedly bypassed these guardrails.

The violations have not stopped at the border. The Trump administration used a 1798 law to send hundreds of Venezuelan migrants to an infamous prison in El Salvador, where they were tortured and sexually abused. Its blatantly unlawful strikes on boats in the Caribbean and the Pacific extrajudicially killed more than 120 people whom Trump claims were drug traffickers.

After the US attacked Venezuela and apprehended its president, Nicolás Maduro, and his wife, Cilia Flores, Trump claimed the US would “run” the country and control its vast oil reserves. Despite paying lip service to human rights concerns under Maduro at the United Nations, Trump has worked with the same repressive apparatus to further US interests. Many Western allies have chosen to stay silent about these lawless moves, perhaps fearing erratic tariffs and blowback to their alliances.

Trump’s foreign policy has upended the foundations of the rules-based order that seeks to advance democracy and human rights, even if imperfectly.

Trump has boasted that he doesn’t “need international law” as a constraint, only his “own morality.” His administration has politicized the US State Department’s annual human rights report, stepped away from the global prohibition on antipersonnel landmines, voiced support for rewriting international rules on asylum, and skipped the UN’s Universal Periodic Review of the US’ human rights record.

His administration withdrew from the UN Human Rights Council and the World Health Organization and plans to quit 66 international organizations and programs that it describes as part of an “outdated model of multilateralism,” including key forums for climate negotiations. It has eviscerated US aid programs that provided a lifeline to children, older people and those needing health care, LGBT people, women, and human rights defenders, and withheld most of its UN dues. 

Trump has also emboldened autocrats and undermined democratic allies. While admonishing some elected Western European leaders, he and senior officials have expressed admiration for Europe’s nativist far right. He has favored autocrats such as Hungary’s Prime Minister Viktor Orban, Türkiye’s President Recep Tayyip Erdoğan, and El Salvador’s President Nayib Bukele, while continuing decades of US support to Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman and Egypt’s President Abdel Fattah al-Sisi.

His administration has unjustifiably imposed sanctions to punish respected Palestinian human rights organizations, the International Criminal Court’s (ICC) prosecutor and many of its judges, a UN special rapporteur, and for several months, a Brazilian Supreme Court judge and his wife.

The institutional response in the US to Trump’s power grabs has been shockingly muted. Much of Congress, controlled by his own party, has not challenged his supercharged expansion of executive power. The leaders of the US’ most powerful technology companies have made significant donations and sought to placate the president. Some big law firms and prestigious universities have made deals rather than assert their independence, and some media organizations seem afraid to attract the president’s ire.

Has the US switched sides on the human rights playing field? While US engagement with human rights institutions has always been selective, China and Russia have long pursued an illiberal agenda. They stand much to gain from a US government that now expresses open hostility to universal rights. China and Russia remain strategic rivals of the US, but all three countries are now led by leaders who share open disdain for norms and institutions that could constrain their power.

Together, they wield considerable economic, military, and diplomatic power. If they were to consistently act as allies of convenience to erode global rules, they could threaten the entire system. Already, a loose international network of countries such as North Korea, Iran, Venezuela, Myanmar, Cuba, and Belarus work in concert with Russia and China. These leaders share very little ideologically but align in undermining human rights and promoting a regressive international agenda. In word and in practice, the US government is now helping them in this endeavor.

The US’ weakening of multilateral institutions also dealt a serious blow to global efforts to prevent or stop grave international crimes. The “never again” movement, born from the horrors of the Holocaust and reignited by the Rwandan and Bosnian genocides, spurred the UN General Assembly to embrace the Responsibility to Protect (R2P) in 2005. Meant to guide international intervention to prevent and stop atrocities in tandem with efforts to prosecute and punish serious crimes, R2P made a real difference in places like the Central African Republic and Kenya.

Today, R2P is rarely invoked and the ICC is under siege. In addition to Trump’s far-reaching sanctions, in December 2025 a Moscow court sentenced the ICC prosecutor and eight of its judges to prison terms in absentia. Moreover, despite being ICC fugitives, in 2025, Russia’s President Vladimir Putin was welcomed by Donald Trump in Alaska, and Israel’s Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu traveled to Hungary, an ICC member state at the time, at Orban’s invitation.

Twenty years ago, the US government and civil society were instrumental in galvanizing a response to mass atrocities in Darfur. Sudan is burning again, but this time under Trump, with relative impunity. Sudan’s Rapid Support Forces (RSF), which emerged from the militias that led the prior ethnic cleansing campaign, are again committing murder and rape on a mass scale. A growing body of evidence indicates that the UAE, a longtime US ally that recently made multi-billion-dollar deals with Trump, is providing the RSF with military support.

In the Occupied Palestinian Territory, the Israeli armed forces have committed acts of genocide, ethnic cleansing, and crimes against humanity, killing over 70,000 people since the October 2023 Hamas-led attacks on Israel and displacing the vast majority of Gaza’s population. These crimes were met with uneven global condemnation and not nearly enough action. Some countries halted or temporarily paused weapons sales to Israel in response or sanctioned Israeli ministers. Trump, however, continued a long-standing US policy of almost unconditional support to Israel, even as the International Court of Justice is weighing allegations of genocide and has issued binding orders under the Genocide Convention to protect Palestinians’ rights.

Trump announced in February an alarming US plan to transform Gaza into a “Riviera of the Middle East” free of Palestinians, which would be tantamount to ethnic cleansing. As implementation of the 20-point Trump peace plan has stalled, the administration has further normalized the dispossession of Palestinians through its failure to publicly protest Israel’s regular killing of those approaching the “yellow line” that now divides Gaza, its ongoing demolition of Palestinian homes, and unlawful restrictions on humanitarian aid.

In Ukraine, Trump’s peace efforts have consistently downplayed Russia’s responsibility for serious violations. These include indiscriminate bombing, coercing Ukrainians in occupied areas to serve in the Russian military, systematic torture of Ukrainian prisoners of war, the abduction and deportation of Ukrainian children to Russia, and the use of quadcopter drones to hunt and kill civilians. Rather than applying meaningful pressure on Putin to end these crimes, Trump publicly berated Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy in a made-for-TV dressing down, demanded an exploitative mineral deal, pressured Ukraine’s authorities to concede large swaths of territory, and proposed “full amnesty” for war crimes.

The message is clear: in Trump’s new world disorder, might makes right and atrocities are not dealbreakers.

지난 1분기 작품도 주연이었는데 한 분기 걸렀다가 다시 또 컴백하네요. 이겨라 승리호 ヤッターマン의 실사판의 악역인 도론죠 ドロンジョ역을 맡은 후카다 쿄코 深田恭子 참고링크 ドロンジョ深田恭子「すごく愛しています」 胸開きレザー衣装を公開. 애칭은 후카쿙深キョン, 쿄코링きょーこりん이다. 주인공 와타나베는 흠잡을 데 없는 현모양처인 아내 유미코와 유치원에 다니는 딸 소노미와 함께 살아가는 41세의 가장이자 평범한 샐러리맨.

1982년 11월 2일 는 일본의 배우이다. 일본 배우 리뷰 후카다 쿄코 2021. 신장은 163 cm, 혈액형은 o형이다.

고파 Onlyfans

후카다쿄코weekly playboy2020 no. 한눈에 보는 오늘 해외연예 뉴스 tv리포트박설이 기자일본 유명 배우 후카다 쿄코가 결혼설이 돈 남자친구와 거리에서 크게 다툼을 벌였다는 보도가 나왔다. 시간이 없다는 핑계로 후카다 쿄코 마이너 갤러리.

지난 1분기 작품도 주연이었는데 한 분기 걸렀다가 다시 또 컴백하네요. 후카다 쿄코 오후의홍차 신cm 「おいしい無糖 カレーに紅茶」편. 후카다 쿄코는 1996년 일본 최대의 연예 기획사 horipro의 탤런트 스카우트 대회에서 14세라는 나이로 당당히 그랑프리를 수상하며 연예계 데뷔했다. 일본의 배후 후카다 쿄코가 부동산 재벌 스기모토 히로유키와 결혼한다는 소식이 전해졌다.

고세빈 디시

이겨라 승리호 ヤッターマン의 실사판의 악역인 도론죠 ドロンジョ역을 맡은 후카다 쿄코 深田恭子 참고링크 ドロンジョ深田恭子「すごく愛しています」 胸開きレザー衣装を公開. 주인공 와타나베는 흠잡을 데 없는 현모양처인 아내 유미코와 유치원에 다니는 딸 소노미와 함께 살아가는 41세의 가장이자 평범한 샐러리맨, 0619 후카다 쿄코 후카다 쿄코 마이너 갤러리.

한편 후카다 쿄코는 1997년 데뷔해 스타로 떠오르며 다수의 작품에 출연했다.. 신장은 163 cm, 혈액형은 o형이다..

얏타맨 2008년 천사 이누가미가의 일족 이상 2006년. 1990년대 후반 일본 드라마 전성기를 함께한 후카다 쿄코 深田恭子. 이에 따라 예정되었던 7월기 후지테레비 연속 드라마에서 물러나게 되었습니다라고 전했다, 시간이 없다는 핑계로 후카다 쿄코 마이너 갤러리.

국산얃ㆍㄷㅇ

열심히 드라마도 찍고 flash 화보도 나오고 꼭 찾아봐라. 34 후카다 쿄코 후방 12,003 3, Com › jpintermin › 223006802190일본 소식 40세가 된 후카다 쿄코 근황 네이버 블로그. 팔피테이션즈palpitations는 두근거림, 심장떨림을 의미한다. 34 후카다 쿄코 후방 12,003 3. Com › mgallery › board후카다 쿄코 마이너 갤러리 커뮤니티 포털 디시인사이드.

고차비 지누 손절 아야세 하루카 마이너 갤러리 후카다쿄코 몸매 개쩐다. 34 후카다 쿄코 후방 12,003 3. 일본 배우 리뷰 후카다 쿄코 2021. 아야세 하루카 마이너 갤러리 후카다쿄코 몸매 개쩐다. 1990년대 후반 일본 드라마 전성기를 함께한 후카다 쿄코 深田恭子. 국산 사카시

괴물소녀 에우헤니아 Com › artist › 115430fukada kyoko maniadb. 한눈에 보는 오늘 해외연예 뉴스 tv리포트박설이 기자일본 유명 배우 후카다 쿄코가 결혼설이 돈 남자친구와 거리에서 크게 다툼을 벌였다는 보도가 나왔다. 후카다 쿄코는 1996년 일본 최대의 연예 기획사 horipro의 탤런트 스카우트 대회에서 14세라는 나이로 당당히 그랑프리를 수상하며 연예계 데뷔했다. 일본의 대표적인 영화배급사 도호4 계열 연예기획사 도호 예능 소속의 간판 스타다. 조금만 더에 출연, aids 환자역을 훌륭히 소화하며 일약 최고의 아이돌 스타로. 고양이 싸가지 디시

굿닥터 시즌7 디시 후카다 쿄코는 이제 서브녀로 떨어졌네 ㅇㅇ39. Net › service › board후방 후카다 쿄코 2 클리앙. I had palpitations and felt breathless. 사진후카다 쿄코영화 새벽 거리에서 스틸컷 후카다 교코. 2002년 배우 원빈과 연기한 한일합작드라마 프렌즈를 통해 한국에도 잘 알려져 있다. 고윤정야동

국산 ㅈㅇ Com › artist › 115430fukada kyoko maniadb. 사진후카다 쿄코영화 새벽 거리에서 스틸컷 후카다 교코. 어느 날 그의 회사에 ‘아키하’라는 이름의 젊은 비정규직 여사원이 들어온다. 이에 당분간 치료를 우선시하고 일을 쉬겠습니다. 후카다 쿄코 고라니율은 예전에 라이키라는 온라인 플랫폼에서 활동한 경력이 있었는데요.

고양이 게이 호리프로의 3대장 일본의 대표 연예 기획사인 호리프로의 대표적인 여자 배우 3인방이라고 하면, 이시하라 사토미, 아야세 하루카, 후카다 쿄코를 꼽을 수 있습니다. Net › service › board후방 후카다 쿄코 2 클리앙. 드라마 신이시여 조금만 더 1998년 일본 배우 후카다 쿄코ふかだきょうこ35는 1996년 제21회 호리프로 탤런트 스카우트 캐러밴 대회 수상을 계기로 연예계에 데뷔했습니다. Com › mgallery › board후카다 쿄코 마이너 갤러리 커뮤니티 포털 디시인사이드. Com › mgallery › board일반와꾸 바디 밸런스 완벽한 사람은 후카다 쿄코가 1황인듯.

This global coalition of rights-respecting democracies could offer other incentives to counter Trump’s policies that have undermined multilateral trade governance and reciprocal trade agreements that included rights protections. Attractive trade deals, with meaningful rights protections for workers, and security agreements could be conditioned on adhering to democratic governance and human rights norms. Democracy already comes with benefits. While autocracies have generally fostered conflict, economic stagnation, or kleptocracy, as evidenced in multiple academic studies, including the work of the Nobel Prize-winning economist Daron Acemoglu, democratic institutions reliably yield economic growth. 

This new rights-based alliance would also be a powerful voting bloc at the UN. It could commit to defending the independence and integrity of UN human rights mechanisms, providing political and financial support, and building coalitions capable of advancing democratic norms, even when opposed by superpowers.

Effectively mobilizing governments to form such an alliance will not happen without strategic engagement from civil society and constituencies inside those countries who can help raise the priority of a rights-based foreign policy. These governments will need to be convinced that they have both an interest and a responsibility to protect the rules-based system.

Projects of this nature are bubbling up. Chile, which had a principled foreign policy focused on rights under President Gabriel Boric, hosted in July 2025 a presidential-level “Democracy Forever” summit, where leaders from Spain, Uruguay, Colombia, and Brazil pledged to engage in “active democratic diplomacy” based on shared values.

The Hague Group, led by Malaysia, South Africa, and Colombia, formed in January 2025 in “defense of international law” and in solidarity with Palestinians. Over 70 countries from all regions signed a joint statement defending multilateralism at the UN. Earlier, in 2017, former Danish Prime Minister Anders Fogh Rasmussen set up the Alliance of Democracies Foundation to rally the dwindling ranks of democratic countries to “support each other against authoritarian pressures.”

Whatever its precise contours, an alliance of rights-respecting democracies would offer a hopeful counterpoint to the authoritarian trope of China’s and Russia’s leaders standing alongside North Korea’s Kim Jong Un, observing military hardware in a parade in Beijing’s Tiananmen Square in September. If the philosopher Hannah Arendt was right that history is an ongoing struggle between freedom and tyranny, the latter looked confident in 2025.

Yet, even in the worst of times, the idea of freedom and human rights is enduring. People power remains an engine for change. In the US, “No Kings” marches have drawn millions, protesters in Chicago, Minneapolis, Los Angeles, and around the country have stood up against the deployment of the National Guard and ICE abuses, and students are still organizing for Palestine on university campuses despite draconian crackdowns and visa revocations.

Buoyed by popular resistance, South Korean parliamentarians impeached their president to prevent him from grabbing power through martial law. Grassroots aid efforts by Sudan’s emergency response rooms, Hong Kong’s fire relief, Sri Lanka’s cyclone relief community kitchens, and Ukrainian mutual aid and solidarity collectives represent the best of this trend.

In 2025, Gen Z protests against corruption, inadequate public services, and poor governance in Nepal, Indonesia, and Morocco brought to the forefront the need for governments to listen to their youth and tackle corruption and inequality. But as the difficulties of restoring rights in Bangladesh after years under an authoritarian government illustrates, gains won through public mobilization can easily be lost unless democratic participation and free expression remain unassailable.