Will Human Rights Survive a Trumpian World?

Authoritarian Advances Threaten Rules-Based Order

The global human rights system is in peril. Under relentless pressure from US President Donald Trump, and persistently undermined by China and Russia, the rules-based international order is being crushed, threatening to take with it the architecture human rights defenders have come to rely on to advance norms and protect freedoms. To defy this trend, governments that still value human rights, alongside social movements, civil society, and international institutions, need to form a strategic alliance to push back.

To be fair, the downward spiral predated Trump’s reelection. The democratic wave that began over 50 years ago has given way to what scholars term a “democratic recession.” Democracy is now back to 1985 levels according to some metrics, with 72 percent of the world’s population now living under autocracy. Russia and China are less free today than 20 years ago. And so is the United States.

Of course, democracy is not a panacea for human rights violations; the US and other longtime democracies have their own histories of colonial crimes, racism, abusive justice systems, and wartime atrocities. More recently, authoritarian leaders have exploited public mistrust and anger to win elections and then dismantled the very institutions that brought them to power. Democratic institutions are crucial to represent the will of the people and keep power in check. It’s no surprise that whenever democracy is undermined, rights are too, as evident in recent years in India, Türkiye, the Philippines, El Salvador, and Hungary.

In this context, 2025 may be seen as a tipping point. In just 12 months, the Trump administration has carried out a broad assault on key pillars of US democracy and the global rules-based order, which the US, despite inconsistencies, was, with other states, instrumental in helping to establish.

In short order, Trump’s second-term administration has undermined trust in the sanctity of elections, reduced government accountability, gutted food assistance and healthcare subsidies, attacked judicial independence, defied court orders, rolled back women’s rights, obstructed access to abortion care, undermined remedies for racial harm, terminated programs mandating accessibility for people with disabilities, punished free speech, stripped protections from trans and intersex people, eroded privacy, and used government power to intimidate political opponents, the media, law firms, universities, civil society, and even comedians.

Claiming a risk of “civilizational erasure” in Europe and leaning on racist tropes to cast entire populations as unwelcome in the US, the Trump administration has embraced policies and rhetoric that align with white nationalist ideology. Immigrants and asylum seekers have been subjected to inhumane conditions and degrading treatment; 32 died in US Immigration and Customs Enforcement custody in 2025, and as of mid-January 2026, an additional 4 have died. Masked immigration enforcement agents have targeted people of color, using excessive force, terrorizing communities, wrongfully arresting scores of citizens, and, most recently, unjustifiably killing two people in Minneapolis, whose deaths Human Rights Watch has documented.

The US president of course has the authority to tighten US borders and enforce stricter immigration policies. The administration is not, however, entitled to deny legal process to asylum seekers, mistreat undocumented migrants, or unlawfully discriminate. In a well-functioning democracy, no electoral mandate should supersede domestic legislation, constitutional protections, or international human rights law. Trump’s team has repeatedly bypassed these guardrails.

The violations have not stopped at the border. The Trump administration used a 1798 law to send hundreds of Venezuelan migrants to an infamous prison in El Salvador, where they were tortured and sexually abused. Its blatantly unlawful strikes on boats in the Caribbean and the Pacific extrajudicially killed more than 120 people whom Trump claims were drug traffickers.

After the US attacked Venezuela and apprehended its president, Nicolás Maduro, and his wife, Cilia Flores, Trump claimed the US would “run” the country and control its vast oil reserves. Despite paying lip service to human rights concerns under Maduro at the United Nations, Trump has worked with the same repressive apparatus to further US interests. Many Western allies have chosen to stay silent about these lawless moves, perhaps fearing erratic tariffs and blowback to their alliances.

Trump’s foreign policy has upended the foundations of the rules-based order that seeks to advance democracy and human rights, even if imperfectly.

Trump has boasted that he doesn’t “need international law” as a constraint, only his “own morality.” His administration has politicized the US State Department’s annual human rights report, stepped away from the global prohibition on antipersonnel landmines, voiced support for rewriting international rules on asylum, and skipped the UN’s Universal Periodic Review of the US’ human rights record.

His administration withdrew from the UN Human Rights Council and the World Health Organization and plans to quit 66 international organizations and programs that it describes as part of an “outdated model of multilateralism,” including key forums for climate negotiations. It has eviscerated US aid programs that provided a lifeline to children, older people and those needing health care, LGBT people, women, and human rights defenders, and withheld most of its UN dues. 

Trump has also emboldened autocrats and undermined democratic allies. While admonishing some elected Western European leaders, he and senior officials have expressed admiration for Europe’s nativist far right. He has favored autocrats such as Hungary’s Prime Minister Viktor Orban, Türkiye’s President Recep Tayyip Erdoğan, and El Salvador’s President Nayib Bukele, while continuing decades of US support to Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman and Egypt’s President Abdel Fattah al-Sisi.

His administration has unjustifiably imposed sanctions to punish respected Palestinian human rights organizations, the International Criminal Court’s (ICC) prosecutor and many of its judges, a UN special rapporteur, and for several months, a Brazilian Supreme Court judge and his wife.

The institutional response in the US to Trump’s power grabs has been shockingly muted. Much of Congress, controlled by his own party, has not challenged his supercharged expansion of executive power. The leaders of the US’ most powerful technology companies have made significant donations and sought to placate the president. Some big law firms and prestigious universities have made deals rather than assert their independence, and some media organizations seem afraid to attract the president’s ire.

Has the US switched sides on the human rights playing field? While US engagement with human rights institutions has always been selective, China and Russia have long pursued an illiberal agenda. They stand much to gain from a US government that now expresses open hostility to universal rights. China and Russia remain strategic rivals of the US, but all three countries are now led by leaders who share open disdain for norms and institutions that could constrain their power.

Together, they wield considerable economic, military, and diplomatic power. If they were to consistently act as allies of convenience to erode global rules, they could threaten the entire system. Already, a loose international network of countries such as North Korea, Iran, Venezuela, Myanmar, Cuba, and Belarus work in concert with Russia and China. These leaders share very little ideologically but align in undermining human rights and promoting a regressive international agenda. In word and in practice, the US government is now helping them in this endeavor.

The US’ weakening of multilateral institutions also dealt a serious blow to global efforts to prevent or stop grave international crimes. The “never again” movement, born from the horrors of the Holocaust and reignited by the Rwandan and Bosnian genocides, spurred the UN General Assembly to embrace the Responsibility to Protect (R2P) in 2005. Meant to guide international intervention to prevent and stop atrocities in tandem with efforts to prosecute and punish serious crimes, R2P made a real difference in places like the Central African Republic and Kenya.

Today, R2P is rarely invoked and the ICC is under siege. In addition to Trump’s far-reaching sanctions, in December 2025 a Moscow court sentenced the ICC prosecutor and eight of its judges to prison terms in absentia. Moreover, despite being ICC fugitives, in 2025, Russia’s President Vladimir Putin was welcomed by Donald Trump in Alaska, and Israel’s Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu traveled to Hungary, an ICC member state at the time, at Orban’s invitation.

Twenty years ago, the US government and civil society were instrumental in galvanizing a response to mass atrocities in Darfur. Sudan is burning again, but this time under Trump, with relative impunity. Sudan’s Rapid Support Forces (RSF), which emerged from the militias that led the prior ethnic cleansing campaign, are again committing murder and rape on a mass scale. A growing body of evidence indicates that the UAE, a longtime US ally that recently made multi-billion-dollar deals with Trump, is providing the RSF with military support.

In the Occupied Palestinian Territory, the Israeli armed forces have committed acts of genocide, ethnic cleansing, and crimes against humanity, killing over 70,000 people since the October 2023 Hamas-led attacks on Israel and displacing the vast majority of Gaza’s population. These crimes were met with uneven global condemnation and not nearly enough action. Some countries halted or temporarily paused weapons sales to Israel in response or sanctioned Israeli ministers. Trump, however, continued a long-standing US policy of almost unconditional support to Israel, even as the International Court of Justice is weighing allegations of genocide and has issued binding orders under the Genocide Convention to protect Palestinians’ rights.

Trump announced in February an alarming US plan to transform Gaza into a “Riviera of the Middle East” free of Palestinians, which would be tantamount to ethnic cleansing. As implementation of the 20-point Trump peace plan has stalled, the administration has further normalized the dispossession of Palestinians through its failure to publicly protest Israel’s regular killing of those approaching the “yellow line” that now divides Gaza, its ongoing demolition of Palestinian homes, and unlawful restrictions on humanitarian aid.

In Ukraine, Trump’s peace efforts have consistently downplayed Russia’s responsibility for serious violations. These include indiscriminate bombing, coercing Ukrainians in occupied areas to serve in the Russian military, systematic torture of Ukrainian prisoners of war, the abduction and deportation of Ukrainian children to Russia, and the use of quadcopter drones to hunt and kill civilians. Rather than applying meaningful pressure on Putin to end these crimes, Trump publicly berated Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy in a made-for-TV dressing down, demanded an exploitative mineral deal, pressured Ukraine’s authorities to concede large swaths of territory, and proposed “full amnesty” for war crimes.

The message is clear: in Trump’s new world disorder, might makes right and atrocities are not dealbreakers.

엄격한 가정 교육을 받아 행동이나 말투가 단정하고 예의 바르다. 평범한 직장인이었으나, 병으로 아내를 잃고 사람이 180도 바뀌게 되었다. 감상적이고 착한 천성으로 환자의 일에 필요 이상으로 깊이 관여한다. 정작 레니는 이들을 삼류 마법사라면서 깠지만 5 이 빈민가 애들이 베일 이 돌봐주는 아이들이었기 때문에 마일에 대한 베일의 마음을 눈치챈 아이들이 마일에게 베일을 어필하기 위한 작전을 펼쳤으나, 전술했듯 이 아이들은 붉은 맹세 일행이 부재중일.

친구 자지 Twitter

케모노 바이러스

이후 밝혀지는 과거회상에 따르면 러브조이 목사가 목사로서의 생에 권태기를 느끼게 만든건 다름아닌 누구보다 신실했던 네드 탓이었다.. 케네스 카티야 3 캐시는 보통 e스킬과 궁극기는 변수 창출을 위해 가능한 한 아끼기 때문에..

Eternal return 무료로 플레이하기, 전투 18명의 플레이어들과 실력을 겨뤄보세요. 디시콘 샵 연비콘 delux 탈퇴한 이용자 샤니마스 영단어 샤니영어콘 헬크 콘 퀸타시로 랜턴군단7 닉넴뭐 랜턴군단6 닉넴뭐. 레니는그냥 불가항력임 이터널 리턴 채널. 케네스 카티야 3 캐시는 보통 e스킬과 궁극기는 변수 창출을 위해 가능한 한 아끼기 때문에, 이 메세지는 같은 인터넷 공급업체를 사용하는 다른 누군가로 인해 발생했을 가능성이 높습니다.

겉으로 보기엔 또래와 별다를 것 없어 보이는 소녀. 마이, 에스텔 위기상황 다만 게임 후반부 통계는 좋지 않아, 전설 무기의 성능을 향상시키고. 29k views 2 years ago.

어린 모습답게 짓궃은 장난을 치는 것을 좋아하고, 당한 사람들의 표정을 보며 웃는다, Kr › board › lostark로스트아크 인벤 레니는상하지않아 로스트아크 인벤 자유 게시판, 스프링필드에 부임한 초기엔 젊고 성실한 목사였으나, 네드가 데이트중에 상대와 손을 잡아도 되냐마냐부터 실수로 이쑤시개를 삼켰는데 어떻게.

칼바ㅏㄻ갤

Su zona horaria es gmt impulsado por the seed engine, Su zona horaria es gmt impulsado por the seed engine. 레니는그냥 불가항력임 이터널 리턴 채널.

이터널 리턴 레니, 귀엽지만 악랄한 서포터. Com › newcharacter › leni69th character leni eternal return, 사용한 디시콘 임시 이리잡탕콘 우냔냐짭천젤 에키온레니는 상하지 않아 무치. 5 2023년2024년에는 판토 의 동글동글 블아콘과 마졧 의 아가당끼콘, 무치 의 레니는 상하지 않아, 밋다다 의 밋다미쿠콘 이 모두 귀여운 그림체와 찰진 활용성으로 인기를 끌면서 2024년 기준으로 창고콘을 이은 새로운 표준으로 자리잡았다. 예전부터 콘셉아트 등 다양한 방면으로 존재가 알려졌으며, 11월 9일 시즌2 업데이트와.

테마카페 퀘스트담자의 퀼트 카페는 레벨 15때 나오며, 보상 아이템으로는 퀼트 장식 세트꾸미기점수 +30을 준다, Kr › board › lostark로스트아크 인벤 레니는상하지않아 로스트아크 인벤 자유 게시판. 레니는 상하지 않아 디시콘 버전은 개수 제한 100개로 슈퍼디럭스r더블디럭스 2개로 나뉘어져 있는 반면 아카콘 버전은 1개로 통합되어있고 콘 추가 기능이 있어서 새로운 콘을 만들 때마다 실시간으로 추가된다.

레니는그냥 불가항력임 이터널 리턴 채널.. 유저 1239395 생각해보니 추화6이면 루이스는 빌려쓰면 되잖아.. 잘하는 레니는 무섭다 이터널 리턴 채널.. 용례 와대가 방송을 점령했던 이후로 달곰레니는 표도기가..

엄격한 가정 교육을 받아 행동이나 말투가 단정하고 예의 바르다. 테마카페 퀘스트담자의 퀼트 카페는 레벨 15때 나오며, 보상 아이템으로는 퀼트 장식 세트꾸미기점수 +30을 준다. 학교에서는 검도부 부부장을 맡고 있다. 겉으로 보기엔 또래와 별다를 것 없어 보이는 소녀. 디시콘 샵 디시콘샵 my디시콘 구매내역 판매등록 내역 판매중지신고 내역 디시콘 제작 디시콘 등록 이용방법 제작가이드, Com › newcharacter › leni69th character leni eternal return.

카일리제너 타이가 18 85 0 레니는 상하지 않아 그림체의 야짤 없나 5. 함께 사진을 찍을 때 주의해야 할 점을 간접적으로 체험하게 하고, 동물의 특성을 생각할 수 있게. 유저 1239395 생각해보니 추화6이면 루이스는 빌려쓰면 되잖아. 29 119 0 ㅋㅋㅋㅋ 4 창띵이 2023. 29k views 2 years ago. 칼카토르

친구랑 라방 시리즈 야동 Kr › board › lostark로스트아크 인벤 레니는상하지않아 로스트아크 인벤 자유 게시판. Kr › board › lostark로스트아크 인벤 레니는상하지않아 로스트아크 인벤 자유 게시판. 잘하는 레니는 무섭다 이터널 리턴 채널. 감상적이고 착한 천성으로 환자의 일에 필요 이상으로 깊이 관여한다. 아 궁 잘박았으면 다따는건데 11 반성성반2080 🎨창작 레니는 상하지않아 아카콘이 출시되었습니다 40 뭇치뭇치204528 내 억제기 1 반만고닉200 망호 침몰직전극한출항 4 싱아200 랭겜 4판만에 지치는데 1 반성성반200. 캄보디아 황하나 디시

카리나 키스짤 디시 돈이 없어 제대로 된 수술과 치료를 해주지 못한 그는 아내가 돈 때문에 read more. 케네스 카티야 3 캐시는 보통 e스킬과 궁극기는 변수 창출을 위해 가능한 한 아끼기 때문에. 20 1642 ㅇㅇ 레니는 상하지 않아 dc app 10. Com › newcharacter › leni69th character leni eternal return. Kr › news › articleview너프 유력. 케데헌 조이 픽시 브

카난 fc 보는 법 18 85 0 레니는 상하지 않아 그림체의 야짤 없나 5. 돈이 없어 제대로 된 수술과 치료를 해주지 못한 그는 아내가 돈 때문에 read more. 상하지 않은 시신이 일반에게 공개되었다고 한다. 유저 1239395 생각해보니 추화6이면 루이스는 빌려쓰면 되잖아. 테마카페 퀘스트담자의 퀼트 카페는 레벨 15때 나오며, 보상 아이템으로는 퀼트 장식 세트꾸미기점수 +30을 준다.

카리나랑 섹스 마이, 에스텔 위기상황 다만 게임 후반부 통계는 좋지 않아, 전설 무기의 성능을 향상시키고. 학교에서는 검도부 부부장을 맡고 있다. 스프링필드에 부임한 초기엔 젊고 성실한 목사였으나, 네드가 데이트중에 상대와 손을 잡아도 되냐마냐부터 실수로 이쑤시개를 삼켰는데 어떻게. 잡담 지인 체술이 자꾸 약하다고 징징대는데 유산급으로 쓰레기임. 학교에서는 검도부 부부장을 맡고 있다.

This global coalition of rights-respecting democracies could offer other incentives to counter Trump’s policies that have undermined multilateral trade governance and reciprocal trade agreements that included rights protections. Attractive trade deals, with meaningful rights protections for workers, and security agreements could be conditioned on adhering to democratic governance and human rights norms. Democracy already comes with benefits. While autocracies have generally fostered conflict, economic stagnation, or kleptocracy, as evidenced in multiple academic studies, including the work of the Nobel Prize-winning economist Daron Acemoglu, democratic institutions reliably yield economic growth. 

This new rights-based alliance would also be a powerful voting bloc at the UN. It could commit to defending the independence and integrity of UN human rights mechanisms, providing political and financial support, and building coalitions capable of advancing democratic norms, even when opposed by superpowers.

Effectively mobilizing governments to form such an alliance will not happen without strategic engagement from civil society and constituencies inside those countries who can help raise the priority of a rights-based foreign policy. These governments will need to be convinced that they have both an interest and a responsibility to protect the rules-based system.

Projects of this nature are bubbling up. Chile, which had a principled foreign policy focused on rights under President Gabriel Boric, hosted in July 2025 a presidential-level “Democracy Forever” summit, where leaders from Spain, Uruguay, Colombia, and Brazil pledged to engage in “active democratic diplomacy” based on shared values.

The Hague Group, led by Malaysia, South Africa, and Colombia, formed in January 2025 in “defense of international law” and in solidarity with Palestinians. Over 70 countries from all regions signed a joint statement defending multilateralism at the UN. Earlier, in 2017, former Danish Prime Minister Anders Fogh Rasmussen set up the Alliance of Democracies Foundation to rally the dwindling ranks of democratic countries to “support each other against authoritarian pressures.”

Whatever its precise contours, an alliance of rights-respecting democracies would offer a hopeful counterpoint to the authoritarian trope of China’s and Russia’s leaders standing alongside North Korea’s Kim Jong Un, observing military hardware in a parade in Beijing’s Tiananmen Square in September. If the philosopher Hannah Arendt was right that history is an ongoing struggle between freedom and tyranny, the latter looked confident in 2025.

Yet, even in the worst of times, the idea of freedom and human rights is enduring. People power remains an engine for change. In the US, “No Kings” marches have drawn millions, protesters in Chicago, Minneapolis, Los Angeles, and around the country have stood up against the deployment of the National Guard and ICE abuses, and students are still organizing for Palestine on university campuses despite draconian crackdowns and visa revocations.

Buoyed by popular resistance, South Korean parliamentarians impeached their president to prevent him from grabbing power through martial law. Grassroots aid efforts by Sudan’s emergency response rooms, Hong Kong’s fire relief, Sri Lanka’s cyclone relief community kitchens, and Ukrainian mutual aid and solidarity collectives represent the best of this trend.

In 2025, Gen Z protests against corruption, inadequate public services, and poor governance in Nepal, Indonesia, and Morocco brought to the forefront the need for governments to listen to their youth and tackle corruption and inequality. But as the difficulties of restoring rights in Bangladesh after years under an authoritarian government illustrates, gains won through public mobilization can easily be lost unless democratic participation and free expression remain unassailable.