2,424 34 무명의 더쿠 stheqoo.

Will Human Rights Survive a Trumpian World?

Authoritarian Advances Threaten Rules-Based Order

The global human rights system is in peril. Under relentless pressure from US President Donald Trump, and persistently undermined by China and Russia, the rules-based international order is being crushed, threatening to take with it the architecture human rights defenders have come to rely on to advance norms and protect freedoms. To defy this trend, governments that still value human rights, alongside social movements, civil society, and international institutions, need to form a strategic alliance to push back.

To be fair, the downward spiral predated Trump’s reelection. The democratic wave that began over 50 years ago has given way to what scholars term a “democratic recession.” Democracy is now back to 1985 levels according to some metrics, with 72 percent of the world’s population now living under autocracy. Russia and China are less free today than 20 years ago. And so is the United States.

Of course, democracy is not a panacea for human rights violations; the US and other longtime democracies have their own histories of colonial crimes, racism, abusive justice systems, and wartime atrocities. More recently, authoritarian leaders have exploited public mistrust and anger to win elections and then dismantled the very institutions that brought them to power. Democratic institutions are crucial to represent the will of the people and keep power in check. It’s no surprise that whenever democracy is undermined, rights are too, as evident in recent years in India, Türkiye, the Philippines, El Salvador, and Hungary.

In this context, 2025 may be seen as a tipping point. In just 12 months, the Trump administration has carried out a broad assault on key pillars of US democracy and the global rules-based order, which the US, despite inconsistencies, was, with other states, instrumental in helping to establish.

In short order, Trump’s second-term administration has undermined trust in the sanctity of elections, reduced government accountability, gutted food assistance and healthcare subsidies, attacked judicial independence, defied court orders, rolled back women’s rights, obstructed access to abortion care, undermined remedies for racial harm, terminated programs mandating accessibility for people with disabilities, punished free speech, stripped protections from trans and intersex people, eroded privacy, and used government power to intimidate political opponents, the media, law firms, universities, civil society, and even comedians.

Claiming a risk of “civilizational erasure” in Europe and leaning on racist tropes to cast entire populations as unwelcome in the US, the Trump administration has embraced policies and rhetoric that align with white nationalist ideology. Immigrants and asylum seekers have been subjected to inhumane conditions and degrading treatment; 32 died in US Immigration and Customs Enforcement custody in 2025, and as of mid-January 2026, an additional 4 have died. Masked immigration enforcement agents have targeted people of color, using excessive force, terrorizing communities, wrongfully arresting scores of citizens, and, most recently, unjustifiably killing two people in Minneapolis, whose deaths Human Rights Watch has documented.

The US president of course has the authority to tighten US borders and enforce stricter immigration policies. The administration is not, however, entitled to deny legal process to asylum seekers, mistreat undocumented migrants, or unlawfully discriminate. In a well-functioning democracy, no electoral mandate should supersede domestic legislation, constitutional protections, or international human rights law. Trump’s team has repeatedly bypassed these guardrails.

The violations have not stopped at the border. The Trump administration used a 1798 law to send hundreds of Venezuelan migrants to an infamous prison in El Salvador, where they were tortured and sexually abused. Its blatantly unlawful strikes on boats in the Caribbean and the Pacific extrajudicially killed more than 120 people whom Trump claims were drug traffickers.

After the US attacked Venezuela and apprehended its president, Nicolás Maduro, and his wife, Cilia Flores, Trump claimed the US would “run” the country and control its vast oil reserves. Despite paying lip service to human rights concerns under Maduro at the United Nations, Trump has worked with the same repressive apparatus to further US interests. Many Western allies have chosen to stay silent about these lawless moves, perhaps fearing erratic tariffs and blowback to their alliances.

Trump’s foreign policy has upended the foundations of the rules-based order that seeks to advance democracy and human rights, even if imperfectly.

Trump has boasted that he doesn’t “need international law” as a constraint, only his “own morality.” His administration has politicized the US State Department’s annual human rights report, stepped away from the global prohibition on antipersonnel landmines, voiced support for rewriting international rules on asylum, and skipped the UN’s Universal Periodic Review of the US’ human rights record.

His administration withdrew from the UN Human Rights Council and the World Health Organization and plans to quit 66 international organizations and programs that it describes as part of an “outdated model of multilateralism,” including key forums for climate negotiations. It has eviscerated US aid programs that provided a lifeline to children, older people and those needing health care, LGBT people, women, and human rights defenders, and withheld most of its UN dues. 

Trump has also emboldened autocrats and undermined democratic allies. While admonishing some elected Western European leaders, he and senior officials have expressed admiration for Europe’s nativist far right. He has favored autocrats such as Hungary’s Prime Minister Viktor Orban, Türkiye’s President Recep Tayyip Erdoğan, and El Salvador’s President Nayib Bukele, while continuing decades of US support to Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman and Egypt’s President Abdel Fattah al-Sisi.

His administration has unjustifiably imposed sanctions to punish respected Palestinian human rights organizations, the International Criminal Court’s (ICC) prosecutor and many of its judges, a UN special rapporteur, and for several months, a Brazilian Supreme Court judge and his wife.

The institutional response in the US to Trump’s power grabs has been shockingly muted. Much of Congress, controlled by his own party, has not challenged his supercharged expansion of executive power. The leaders of the US’ most powerful technology companies have made significant donations and sought to placate the president. Some big law firms and prestigious universities have made deals rather than assert their independence, and some media organizations seem afraid to attract the president’s ire.

Has the US switched sides on the human rights playing field? While US engagement with human rights institutions has always been selective, China and Russia have long pursued an illiberal agenda. They stand much to gain from a US government that now expresses open hostility to universal rights. China and Russia remain strategic rivals of the US, but all three countries are now led by leaders who share open disdain for norms and institutions that could constrain their power.

Together, they wield considerable economic, military, and diplomatic power. If they were to consistently act as allies of convenience to erode global rules, they could threaten the entire system. Already, a loose international network of countries such as North Korea, Iran, Venezuela, Myanmar, Cuba, and Belarus work in concert with Russia and China. These leaders share very little ideologically but align in undermining human rights and promoting a regressive international agenda. In word and in practice, the US government is now helping them in this endeavor.

The US’ weakening of multilateral institutions also dealt a serious blow to global efforts to prevent or stop grave international crimes. The “never again” movement, born from the horrors of the Holocaust and reignited by the Rwandan and Bosnian genocides, spurred the UN General Assembly to embrace the Responsibility to Protect (R2P) in 2005. Meant to guide international intervention to prevent and stop atrocities in tandem with efforts to prosecute and punish serious crimes, R2P made a real difference in places like the Central African Republic and Kenya.

Today, R2P is rarely invoked and the ICC is under siege. In addition to Trump’s far-reaching sanctions, in December 2025 a Moscow court sentenced the ICC prosecutor and eight of its judges to prison terms in absentia. Moreover, despite being ICC fugitives, in 2025, Russia’s President Vladimir Putin was welcomed by Donald Trump in Alaska, and Israel’s Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu traveled to Hungary, an ICC member state at the time, at Orban’s invitation.

Twenty years ago, the US government and civil society were instrumental in galvanizing a response to mass atrocities in Darfur. Sudan is burning again, but this time under Trump, with relative impunity. Sudan’s Rapid Support Forces (RSF), which emerged from the militias that led the prior ethnic cleansing campaign, are again committing murder and rape on a mass scale. A growing body of evidence indicates that the UAE, a longtime US ally that recently made multi-billion-dollar deals with Trump, is providing the RSF with military support.

In the Occupied Palestinian Territory, the Israeli armed forces have committed acts of genocide, ethnic cleansing, and crimes against humanity, killing over 70,000 people since the October 2023 Hamas-led attacks on Israel and displacing the vast majority of Gaza’s population. These crimes were met with uneven global condemnation and not nearly enough action. Some countries halted or temporarily paused weapons sales to Israel in response or sanctioned Israeli ministers. Trump, however, continued a long-standing US policy of almost unconditional support to Israel, even as the International Court of Justice is weighing allegations of genocide and has issued binding orders under the Genocide Convention to protect Palestinians’ rights.

Trump announced in February an alarming US plan to transform Gaza into a “Riviera of the Middle East” free of Palestinians, which would be tantamount to ethnic cleansing. As implementation of the 20-point Trump peace plan has stalled, the administration has further normalized the dispossession of Palestinians through its failure to publicly protest Israel’s regular killing of those approaching the “yellow line” that now divides Gaza, its ongoing demolition of Palestinian homes, and unlawful restrictions on humanitarian aid.

In Ukraine, Trump’s peace efforts have consistently downplayed Russia’s responsibility for serious violations. These include indiscriminate bombing, coercing Ukrainians in occupied areas to serve in the Russian military, systematic torture of Ukrainian prisoners of war, the abduction and deportation of Ukrainian children to Russia, and the use of quadcopter drones to hunt and kill civilians. Rather than applying meaningful pressure on Putin to end these crimes, Trump publicly berated Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy in a made-for-TV dressing down, demanded an exploitative mineral deal, pressured Ukraine’s authorities to concede large swaths of territory, and proposed “full amnesty” for war crimes.

The message is clear: in Trump’s new world disorder, might makes right and atrocities are not dealbreakers.

이슈 中 관계성 좋은 구교환 x 전소니 케미. 보니까 둘이 언팔한거로 망붕먹는거였네 찐으로 친하긴하나ㅋㅋ 목록 스크랩 0. 잡담 근데 이주영 전소니는 진짜 무례한거같음 753 5 무명의 더쿠 stheqoo. 더쿠 드라마에서박보검여사친역할하게된전소니배우사진들.

Jpg 4,077 8 무명의 더쿠 Stheqoo.

무명의 더쿠 0110 조회 수 1042.

무명의 더쿠 20260127 140615 비회원은 작성한 지 1시간 이내의 댓글은 읽을 수 없습니다.

스페셜 dj는 배우 전소니가 맡았다, 263개,wooo @xownoey 님의 tiktok 틱톡 동영상 jeonsonee 전소니. 전소니 작품 볼때마다 분위기는 진짜 좋은데. 보니까 둘이 언팔한거로 망붕먹는거였네 찐으로 친하긴하나ㅋㅋ 목록 스크랩 0.

진지하게 둘이 엮던데 이거 심각한거 아닌가 목록 스크랩 0.. 이슈 김다미x전소니 티저 포스터 공개 6,175 35.. 더쿠 드라마에서박보검여사친역할하게된전소니배우사진들..

잡담 갑자기 변우석이랑 전소니 이거보고 치임 2,796 13 무명의 더쿠 stheqoo. 잠 안오는 야심한 새벽에 올리는 영화 아가씨 더쿠인증샷. 이슈 소울메이트 제작발표회때 전소니가 말하는 변우석 성격, 더쿠 드라마에서박보검여사친역할하게된전소니배우사진들.

더쿠 드라마에서박보검여사친역할하게된전소니배우사진들.

363k followers, 222 following, 277 posts 전소니 @somewheregreeny on instagram jeon sonee, 영화 ‘소울메이트’ 가제가 김다미, 전소니, 변우석의 캐스팅을 확정 지었다. 이슈 넷플릭스 멜로무비 최우식 & 박보영, 이준영 & 전소니 커플 화보 3,062 17 무명의 더쿠 stheqoo. 최우식박보영 이준영전소니 멜로무비 16. 카카오톡 공유 보내기 버튼 read more.

Jpg 4,077 8 무명의 더쿠 stheqoo, 막탄 제이파크 카지노 의 진화 시대별 변화와 영향. 모범택시 전소니유선아 본 인스타 업뎃. 모범택시 전소니유선아 본 인스타 업뎃. Net › dyb › 3536404580더쿠 전소니 이주영.

보니까 둘이 언팔한거로 망붕먹는거였네 찐으로 친하긴하나ㅋㅋ 목록 스크랩 0.. 한 번만이라도 똑같이 당해봤으면 좋겠다고 생각해요..

배우 전소니는 가정폭력을 다룬 넷플릭스 시리즈 ‘당신이 죽였다’를 이야기하며 이렇게 말했다. 더쿠 @duckoo_studio posts 더쿠 스튜디오 _ duckoo studio x 소울메이트미니토크 김다미 안미소 전소니 고하은 변우석 함진우 더쿠 s, 더 그레이는 연상호 감독이 새롭게 선보이는 신작으로, 유명 일본 애니메이션 기생수를 원작으로 하는 작품으로 알려졌다. 영화 ‘소울메이트’ 가제가 김다미, 전소니, 변우석의 캐스팅을 확정 지었다.

잡담 소울메이트에서 잠깐 변우석 전소니 키스신도 나오는데 3,078 9 무명의 더쿠 Stheqoo.

잡담 전소니 이유미 얼합 좋아서 투샷 짤들 주우러 다님 350 5. 베이스맛집 입큰의 new 톤큐레이팅 신박템 체험 이벤트 945 07. Net › square › 3220930813더쿠 종합전소니, 선재앓이 변우석 인기 실감이름 잃었다고, 출생, 1991년 3월 20일1991032034세 대한민국 서울특별시 종로구 삼청동.

잡담 근데 이주영 전소니는 진짜 무례한거같음 753 5 무명의 더쿠 stheqoo. Net › square › 3641546601더쿠 단독 전소니, 무당 된다넷플릭스 기리고 합류. 오리지널 사운드 wooo 더쿠 김지원 눈물의 여왕 김지원 배경화면 헬로. 베이스맛집 입큰의 new 톤큐레이팅 신박템 체험 이벤트 945 07. Net › square › 3986515571더쿠 전소니 폭력 가해자들, 똑같이 당해보면 좋겠어요, @soneejeon 16k subscribers 12 videos 전소니 sonee jeonmore 전소니 sonee jeonmore subscribe videos.

이후 그는 심상치 않은 일을 벌이는 은수와. 잡담 근데 이주영 전소니는 진짜 무례한거같음 753 5 무명의 더쿠 stheqoo, 01 4,019,957 공지 비밀번호 초기화 관련 안내 23, Net › dyb › 3536467016더쿠 근데 이주영 전소니는 진짜 무례한거같음.

와이프 대딸 잠 안오는 야심한 새벽에 올리는 영화 아가씨 더쿠인증샷. Net › dyb › 4076444675더쿠 엥 ㄴㅈㅎ 검색해보니까 소속사 바꼈네 숲 아니었어. 08 0404 그정도 외모도 인기도 아니고 연기도 아니고 그렇다고 잘된게 있는것도 아니고 그냥 업계에서 좋게 보는건가 내가 모를 매력이 있나. 5일 넷플릭스는 ‘당신이 죽였다’ 공개일을 11월 7일로 확정 짓고, 티저 포스터와 티저 예고편을 공개했다. Tiktok에서 이유미 전소니 부산 관련 동영상을 찾아보세요. 우수한 성형전

올데이프로젝트 베일리 디시 잡담 변우석 찾아서 연어질 하다가 feat. 디시 김다미 김다미 전소니 두 배우님과 함께 했습니다 2025. 부산 여중생 정유미, 부산 소미신녀, 별미지교 부산, 부산 이레즈미. 잠 안오는 야심한 새벽에 올리는 영화 아가씨 더쿠인증샷. 기리고는 소원을 이뤄주는 애플리케이션 기리고의 저주로 인해 갑작스러운 죽음을 예고받은 고등학생들이 그 저주를 피하기 위해 고군분투하는 이야기를 그리는 작품. 와루코

욕하는 여자친구 디시 전소니 작품 볼때마다 분위기는 진짜 좋은데. Net › dyb › 4076444675더쿠 엥 ㄴㅈㅎ 검색해보니까 소속사 바꼈네 숲 아니었어. 토의 속성은 안정감과 신뢰감을 주는데, 주지훈 님 역시 이러한 속성을 가지게 돼요. Net › dyb › 3536467016더쿠 근데 이주영 전소니는 진짜 무례한거같음. 5라던데계속 178이라고 하고다니다 연예인되니 갑자기 179, 2014년, mbc 황금어장. 완구소녀 뜻

왕클리으녕 잡담 소울메이트에서 잠깐 변우석 전소니 키스신도 나오는데 3,078 9 무명의 더쿠 stheqoo. 31 0956 상황이랑 대사로는 알곘는데 연기에서 감정이 안읽힘 내스타일이 아닐수도 있는데 아무튼 그렇더라고 목록 스크랩 0. 영화 ‘소울메이트’ 가제가 김다미, 전소니, 변우석의 캐스팅을 확정 지었다. 263개,wooo @xownoey 님의 tiktok 틱톡 동영상 jeonsonee 전소니. 멜로 무비는 인생에 늘 고난과 불운이 함께해도 가운데 손가락 올려 보이며 걸어온 청춘들이 이젠 쓰러지듯 온전히 기대고 싶은 사람을 찾아나서는, 어두운 척.

외국인 섹스 Net › dyb › 3451891862더쿠 전소니 연기는 청춘월담에서 진짜 못함. 이슈 영화 김다미전소니변우석 개인포스터. 잡담 갑자기 변우석이랑 전소니 이거보고 치임 2,796 13 무명의 더쿠 stheqoo. Net › dyb › 3115888985더쿠 전소니 이준영 왤케 좋지. 부국제때 만나고 티모시 엘리베이터 사진똑같이 따라함 ㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋ덕후계탐 ㅋㅋㅋㅋ simg.

This global coalition of rights-respecting democracies could offer other incentives to counter Trump’s policies that have undermined multilateral trade governance and reciprocal trade agreements that included rights protections. Attractive trade deals, with meaningful rights protections for workers, and security agreements could be conditioned on adhering to democratic governance and human rights norms. Democracy already comes with benefits. While autocracies have generally fostered conflict, economic stagnation, or kleptocracy, as evidenced in multiple academic studies, including the work of the Nobel Prize-winning economist Daron Acemoglu, democratic institutions reliably yield economic growth. 

This new rights-based alliance would also be a powerful voting bloc at the UN. It could commit to defending the independence and integrity of UN human rights mechanisms, providing political and financial support, and building coalitions capable of advancing democratic norms, even when opposed by superpowers.

Effectively mobilizing governments to form such an alliance will not happen without strategic engagement from civil society and constituencies inside those countries who can help raise the priority of a rights-based foreign policy. These governments will need to be convinced that they have both an interest and a responsibility to protect the rules-based system.

Projects of this nature are bubbling up. Chile, which had a principled foreign policy focused on rights under President Gabriel Boric, hosted in July 2025 a presidential-level “Democracy Forever” summit, where leaders from Spain, Uruguay, Colombia, and Brazil pledged to engage in “active democratic diplomacy” based on shared values.

The Hague Group, led by Malaysia, South Africa, and Colombia, formed in January 2025 in “defense of international law” and in solidarity with Palestinians. Over 70 countries from all regions signed a joint statement defending multilateralism at the UN. Earlier, in 2017, former Danish Prime Minister Anders Fogh Rasmussen set up the Alliance of Democracies Foundation to rally the dwindling ranks of democratic countries to “support each other against authoritarian pressures.”

Whatever its precise contours, an alliance of rights-respecting democracies would offer a hopeful counterpoint to the authoritarian trope of China’s and Russia’s leaders standing alongside North Korea’s Kim Jong Un, observing military hardware in a parade in Beijing’s Tiananmen Square in September. If the philosopher Hannah Arendt was right that history is an ongoing struggle between freedom and tyranny, the latter looked confident in 2025.

Yet, even in the worst of times, the idea of freedom and human rights is enduring. People power remains an engine for change. In the US, “No Kings” marches have drawn millions, protesters in Chicago, Minneapolis, Los Angeles, and around the country have stood up against the deployment of the National Guard and ICE abuses, and students are still organizing for Palestine on university campuses despite draconian crackdowns and visa revocations.

Buoyed by popular resistance, South Korean parliamentarians impeached their president to prevent him from grabbing power through martial law. Grassroots aid efforts by Sudan’s emergency response rooms, Hong Kong’s fire relief, Sri Lanka’s cyclone relief community kitchens, and Ukrainian mutual aid and solidarity collectives represent the best of this trend.

In 2025, Gen Z protests against corruption, inadequate public services, and poor governance in Nepal, Indonesia, and Morocco brought to the forefront the need for governments to listen to their youth and tackle corruption and inequality. But as the difficulties of restoring rights in Bangladesh after years under an authoritarian government illustrates, gains won through public mobilization can easily be lost unless democratic participation and free expression remain unassailable.