Will Human Rights Survive a Trumpian World?

Authoritarian Advances Threaten Rules-Based Order

The global human rights system is in peril. Under relentless pressure from US President Donald Trump, and persistently undermined by China and Russia, the rules-based international order is being crushed, threatening to take with it the architecture human rights defenders have come to rely on to advance norms and protect freedoms. To defy this trend, governments that still value human rights, alongside social movements, civil society, and international institutions, need to form a strategic alliance to push back.

To be fair, the downward spiral predated Trump’s reelection. The democratic wave that began over 50 years ago has given way to what scholars term a “democratic recession.” Democracy is now back to 1985 levels according to some metrics, with 72 percent of the world’s population now living under autocracy. Russia and China are less free today than 20 years ago. And so is the United States.

Of course, democracy is not a panacea for human rights violations; the US and other longtime democracies have their own histories of colonial crimes, racism, abusive justice systems, and wartime atrocities. More recently, authoritarian leaders have exploited public mistrust and anger to win elections and then dismantled the very institutions that brought them to power. Democratic institutions are crucial to represent the will of the people and keep power in check. It’s no surprise that whenever democracy is undermined, rights are too, as evident in recent years in India, Türkiye, the Philippines, El Salvador, and Hungary.

In this context, 2025 may be seen as a tipping point. In just 12 months, the Trump administration has carried out a broad assault on key pillars of US democracy and the global rules-based order, which the US, despite inconsistencies, was, with other states, instrumental in helping to establish.

In short order, Trump’s second-term administration has undermined trust in the sanctity of elections, reduced government accountability, gutted food assistance and healthcare subsidies, attacked judicial independence, defied court orders, rolled back women’s rights, obstructed access to abortion care, undermined remedies for racial harm, terminated programs mandating accessibility for people with disabilities, punished free speech, stripped protections from trans and intersex people, eroded privacy, and used government power to intimidate political opponents, the media, law firms, universities, civil society, and even comedians.

Claiming a risk of “civilizational erasure” in Europe and leaning on racist tropes to cast entire populations as unwelcome in the US, the Trump administration has embraced policies and rhetoric that align with white nationalist ideology. Immigrants and asylum seekers have been subjected to inhumane conditions and degrading treatment; 32 died in US Immigration and Customs Enforcement custody in 2025, and as of mid-January 2026, an additional 4 have died. Masked immigration enforcement agents have targeted people of color, using excessive force, terrorizing communities, wrongfully arresting scores of citizens, and, most recently, unjustifiably killing two people in Minneapolis, whose deaths Human Rights Watch has documented.

The US president of course has the authority to tighten US borders and enforce stricter immigration policies. The administration is not, however, entitled to deny legal process to asylum seekers, mistreat undocumented migrants, or unlawfully discriminate. In a well-functioning democracy, no electoral mandate should supersede domestic legislation, constitutional protections, or international human rights law. Trump’s team has repeatedly bypassed these guardrails.

The violations have not stopped at the border. The Trump administration used a 1798 law to send hundreds of Venezuelan migrants to an infamous prison in El Salvador, where they were tortured and sexually abused. Its blatantly unlawful strikes on boats in the Caribbean and the Pacific extrajudicially killed more than 120 people whom Trump claims were drug traffickers.

After the US attacked Venezuela and apprehended its president, Nicolás Maduro, and his wife, Cilia Flores, Trump claimed the US would “run” the country and control its vast oil reserves. Despite paying lip service to human rights concerns under Maduro at the United Nations, Trump has worked with the same repressive apparatus to further US interests. Many Western allies have chosen to stay silent about these lawless moves, perhaps fearing erratic tariffs and blowback to their alliances.

Trump’s foreign policy has upended the foundations of the rules-based order that seeks to advance democracy and human rights, even if imperfectly.

Trump has boasted that he doesn’t “need international law” as a constraint, only his “own morality.” His administration has politicized the US State Department’s annual human rights report, stepped away from the global prohibition on antipersonnel landmines, voiced support for rewriting international rules on asylum, and skipped the UN’s Universal Periodic Review of the US’ human rights record.

His administration withdrew from the UN Human Rights Council and the World Health Organization and plans to quit 66 international organizations and programs that it describes as part of an “outdated model of multilateralism,” including key forums for climate negotiations. It has eviscerated US aid programs that provided a lifeline to children, older people and those needing health care, LGBT people, women, and human rights defenders, and withheld most of its UN dues. 

Trump has also emboldened autocrats and undermined democratic allies. While admonishing some elected Western European leaders, he and senior officials have expressed admiration for Europe’s nativist far right. He has favored autocrats such as Hungary’s Prime Minister Viktor Orban, Türkiye’s President Recep Tayyip Erdoğan, and El Salvador’s President Nayib Bukele, while continuing decades of US support to Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman and Egypt’s President Abdel Fattah al-Sisi.

His administration has unjustifiably imposed sanctions to punish respected Palestinian human rights organizations, the International Criminal Court’s (ICC) prosecutor and many of its judges, a UN special rapporteur, and for several months, a Brazilian Supreme Court judge and his wife.

The institutional response in the US to Trump’s power grabs has been shockingly muted. Much of Congress, controlled by his own party, has not challenged his supercharged expansion of executive power. The leaders of the US’ most powerful technology companies have made significant donations and sought to placate the president. Some big law firms and prestigious universities have made deals rather than assert their independence, and some media organizations seem afraid to attract the president’s ire.

Has the US switched sides on the human rights playing field? While US engagement with human rights institutions has always been selective, China and Russia have long pursued an illiberal agenda. They stand much to gain from a US government that now expresses open hostility to universal rights. China and Russia remain strategic rivals of the US, but all three countries are now led by leaders who share open disdain for norms and institutions that could constrain their power.

Together, they wield considerable economic, military, and diplomatic power. If they were to consistently act as allies of convenience to erode global rules, they could threaten the entire system. Already, a loose international network of countries such as North Korea, Iran, Venezuela, Myanmar, Cuba, and Belarus work in concert with Russia and China. These leaders share very little ideologically but align in undermining human rights and promoting a regressive international agenda. In word and in practice, the US government is now helping them in this endeavor.

The US’ weakening of multilateral institutions also dealt a serious blow to global efforts to prevent or stop grave international crimes. The “never again” movement, born from the horrors of the Holocaust and reignited by the Rwandan and Bosnian genocides, spurred the UN General Assembly to embrace the Responsibility to Protect (R2P) in 2005. Meant to guide international intervention to prevent and stop atrocities in tandem with efforts to prosecute and punish serious crimes, R2P made a real difference in places like the Central African Republic and Kenya.

Today, R2P is rarely invoked and the ICC is under siege. In addition to Trump’s far-reaching sanctions, in December 2025 a Moscow court sentenced the ICC prosecutor and eight of its judges to prison terms in absentia. Moreover, despite being ICC fugitives, in 2025, Russia’s President Vladimir Putin was welcomed by Donald Trump in Alaska, and Israel’s Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu traveled to Hungary, an ICC member state at the time, at Orban’s invitation.

Twenty years ago, the US government and civil society were instrumental in galvanizing a response to mass atrocities in Darfur. Sudan is burning again, but this time under Trump, with relative impunity. Sudan’s Rapid Support Forces (RSF), which emerged from the militias that led the prior ethnic cleansing campaign, are again committing murder and rape on a mass scale. A growing body of evidence indicates that the UAE, a longtime US ally that recently made multi-billion-dollar deals with Trump, is providing the RSF with military support.

In the Occupied Palestinian Territory, the Israeli armed forces have committed acts of genocide, ethnic cleansing, and crimes against humanity, killing over 70,000 people since the October 2023 Hamas-led attacks on Israel and displacing the vast majority of Gaza’s population. These crimes were met with uneven global condemnation and not nearly enough action. Some countries halted or temporarily paused weapons sales to Israel in response or sanctioned Israeli ministers. Trump, however, continued a long-standing US policy of almost unconditional support to Israel, even as the International Court of Justice is weighing allegations of genocide and has issued binding orders under the Genocide Convention to protect Palestinians’ rights.

Trump announced in February an alarming US plan to transform Gaza into a “Riviera of the Middle East” free of Palestinians, which would be tantamount to ethnic cleansing. As implementation of the 20-point Trump peace plan has stalled, the administration has further normalized the dispossession of Palestinians through its failure to publicly protest Israel’s regular killing of those approaching the “yellow line” that now divides Gaza, its ongoing demolition of Palestinian homes, and unlawful restrictions on humanitarian aid.

In Ukraine, Trump’s peace efforts have consistently downplayed Russia’s responsibility for serious violations. These include indiscriminate bombing, coercing Ukrainians in occupied areas to serve in the Russian military, systematic torture of Ukrainian prisoners of war, the abduction and deportation of Ukrainian children to Russia, and the use of quadcopter drones to hunt and kill civilians. Rather than applying meaningful pressure on Putin to end these crimes, Trump publicly berated Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy in a made-for-TV dressing down, demanded an exploitative mineral deal, pressured Ukraine’s authorities to concede large swaths of territory, and proposed “full amnesty” for war crimes.

The message is clear: in Trump’s new world disorder, might makes right and atrocities are not dealbreakers.

이 가이드에서는 일본의 제3의 도시인 나고야를 거점으로 이용하는 장점과, 나고야만의 실용적인 관광 정보음식, 역사, 산업에 대해 설명합니다. Likes, 0 comments kndtins on octo 大須観音 念仏を聞いて線香の香りを嗅ぐとなぜかココロが落ち着くので 寺はメンタルヘルス的に非常によろし😌 南無〜. 나고야 서부 나고야역 서쪽 지역, 아라코 관음荒子観音, 엔도지円頓寺. 오스 맛집 탐방 오스관음 나고야맛집 나고야인스타그램 나고야인스타그램교류회맛집부 닭날개딸 나고야닭날개딸 닭날개딸 오스점 원조전체닭날개모듬 나고야여자여행 나고야관광 나고야관광 나고야관광명소 photo804562197somebody save ui ui and.

오해원 갤러리

우멍멍 나무위키

오사카 핀사로

관세음보살님을 모신 관음전에서 간절히 소원성취를 기도하시기 바랍니다.. 관세음보살을 모신 오스칸논 오스관음 나고야 여행 일정에서 빠지지 않는 관광명소 오스칸논을 찾아왔어요..

외계인야동

다음 여행 계획을 위해 이러한 실제 여행. 관음 보살인 칸논의 나무 조각상, 복잡한 나무 종소리, 그리고 주요 전당을 장식하는 거대한 붉은 종이 등불을 발견하여 평화로운 분위기에 영적인 감성을 더하세요, 공식 명칭은 북산신복사 보생원으로, 창건은 1324년으로 거슬러 올라갑니다. 이 목상은 원래 사원의 건물을 대부분 파괴한 대화재에서 기적적으로 살아남았습니다. Ssohyyun_00 on aug 나고야 안농 🌼🌿🌺🏞 일본 여행 나고야 휴가 아쓰다신궁 도쿠가와엔 나고야성 오스관음 오스아케이드 오아시스21 티비탑 히시야오도리공원 사카에 힐튼호텔.

오스칸논 여행 정보와 후기 정리 나고야. 대자대비를 서원으로 하는 관세음보살을 일심으로 염불하여 현세의 고난에서 벗어날 수 있는 영험을 얻고자 하는 신앙형태이다. Likes, 0 comments gift_of_japanese_culture on octo osukannon 大須観音 大須觀音 大须观音 오스관음 japantravel visitjapan explorejapan japanculture discoverjapan tatami 日本旅遊 探索日本 發現日本 日本文化 日本景點 榻榻米 日本旅游 探索日本 发现日本 日本文化 日本景点 榻榻米 일본여행 일본. 오스관음의 문전 거리로써 번창해 온 오스 지역.

나고야성을 둘러보는 여행 나고야성오스칸논, 이곳에서 중요하게 살표볼 유물은 신곤 불교 창시자가 조각했다는 관음보살 칸논 목상이라고 해요. Tiktok video from note @pndu96799 leonn. 전세계 여행자들의 게시물을 통해 이누야마 성하마을의 인기 명소, 호텔, 교통, 음식에 대해 자세히 알아보세요, Genzot vol 2 arsz aeresa.

와이고수 졈니 나고야 최대의 상점가 중 하나이며, 동시에 도카이 지방 최대의 전자상가이자 오타쿠 거리로도. 친구와 쏘다닌 오사카 거리 그리고 아리마 온천. 소박한 보물을 간직한 웅장한 건축물 오스 칸논에서 중요하게 살펴볼 유물은 바로 신곤 불교의 창시자인 고보 다이시 774835가 조각했다고 하는 관음보살 칸논 목상입니다. 정식 명칭은 기타노산 신푸쿠지 호세인이라 하며, 기타노텐만궁의 흐름을 계승하고 있습니다. 597년, 이세 지모쿠무라의 어부인 류마로라는 사람이 강 상류의 후미진 곳에서 그물망을 놓던. 오줌 javrank

오킹 야외 디시 아이치현 츠루마이시 가나야마시 오스 오뎅 야키톤 다이코쿠오스관음점 좌석 예약 전용. 중생들을 고통에서 건져주시는 대자 대비의 관세음보살님. 중생들을 고통에서 건져주시는 대자 대비의 관세음보살님. 혈관음 혈관음 소설 관음문 관음교통 캐논 기업 관음송 한자는 동일하지만, 붙은 이유는 관세음보살과는 크게 상관 없다. 이 관음상은 무자비한 화재에서 벗어나 기적적으로 원래 자리에 홀로 남겨졌기 때문입니다. 요가 다나

오줌 지린 여자 캐릭터 만화 혈관음 혈관음 소설 관음문 관음교통 캐논 기업 관음송 한자는 동일하지만, 붙은 이유는 관세음보살과는 크게 상관 없다. 다음 여행 계획을 위해 이러한 실제 여행. 관세음보살을 초청하여 덕을 찬양하고, 보살핌을 발원하는 관음신앙 의식이다. 대자대비를 서원으로 하는 관세음보살을 일심으로 염불하여 현세의 고난에서 벗어날 수 있는 영험을 얻고자 하는 신앙형태이다. 나고야역 서쪽 지역, 아라코 관음荒子観音, 엔도지円頓寺. 오해원 엉덩이

오사카 멘에스 165 likes, 9 comments travel_w_suesuejanu on 남해 보리암 금산산장 우리나라 관음성지 중 한곳이라는 보리암🏔 신혼여행. Com › moments › theme2026년 이누야마 성하마을 추천 완벽 가이드 1월 업데이트. 도쿄 아사쿠사 간논, 미에현 츠 간논과. 관세음보살을 모신 오스칸논 오스관음 나고야 여행 일정에서 빠지지 않는 관광명소 오스칸논을 찾아왔어요. 도요토미 히데요시하시바 토키치로의 출생지라고 전해져 오는 나카무라구中村区에는.

완구소녀 디시 경내에 있는 일본 최고의 고사기 사본을 시작해 일한 고서 15000권을 소장하고 있다. Aoyagisohonke osu honten funliday 여행계획, 추억 공유. 나고야 서부 나고야역 서쪽 지역, 아라코 관음荒子観音, 엔도지円頓寺. 이 목상은 원래 사원의 건물을 대부분 파괴한 대화재에서 기적적으로 살아남았습니다. Com › moments › theme2026년 이누야마 성하마을 추천 완벽 가이드 1월 업데이트.

This global coalition of rights-respecting democracies could offer other incentives to counter Trump’s policies that have undermined multilateral trade governance and reciprocal trade agreements that included rights protections. Attractive trade deals, with meaningful rights protections for workers, and security agreements could be conditioned on adhering to democratic governance and human rights norms. Democracy already comes with benefits. While autocracies have generally fostered conflict, economic stagnation, or kleptocracy, as evidenced in multiple academic studies, including the work of the Nobel Prize-winning economist Daron Acemoglu, democratic institutions reliably yield economic growth. 

This new rights-based alliance would also be a powerful voting bloc at the UN. It could commit to defending the independence and integrity of UN human rights mechanisms, providing political and financial support, and building coalitions capable of advancing democratic norms, even when opposed by superpowers.

Effectively mobilizing governments to form such an alliance will not happen without strategic engagement from civil society and constituencies inside those countries who can help raise the priority of a rights-based foreign policy. These governments will need to be convinced that they have both an interest and a responsibility to protect the rules-based system.

Projects of this nature are bubbling up. Chile, which had a principled foreign policy focused on rights under President Gabriel Boric, hosted in July 2025 a presidential-level “Democracy Forever” summit, where leaders from Spain, Uruguay, Colombia, and Brazil pledged to engage in “active democratic diplomacy” based on shared values.

The Hague Group, led by Malaysia, South Africa, and Colombia, formed in January 2025 in “defense of international law” and in solidarity with Palestinians. Over 70 countries from all regions signed a joint statement defending multilateralism at the UN. Earlier, in 2017, former Danish Prime Minister Anders Fogh Rasmussen set up the Alliance of Democracies Foundation to rally the dwindling ranks of democratic countries to “support each other against authoritarian pressures.”

Whatever its precise contours, an alliance of rights-respecting democracies would offer a hopeful counterpoint to the authoritarian trope of China’s and Russia’s leaders standing alongside North Korea’s Kim Jong Un, observing military hardware in a parade in Beijing’s Tiananmen Square in September. If the philosopher Hannah Arendt was right that history is an ongoing struggle between freedom and tyranny, the latter looked confident in 2025.

Yet, even in the worst of times, the idea of freedom and human rights is enduring. People power remains an engine for change. In the US, “No Kings” marches have drawn millions, protesters in Chicago, Minneapolis, Los Angeles, and around the country have stood up against the deployment of the National Guard and ICE abuses, and students are still organizing for Palestine on university campuses despite draconian crackdowns and visa revocations.

Buoyed by popular resistance, South Korean parliamentarians impeached their president to prevent him from grabbing power through martial law. Grassroots aid efforts by Sudan’s emergency response rooms, Hong Kong’s fire relief, Sri Lanka’s cyclone relief community kitchens, and Ukrainian mutual aid and solidarity collectives represent the best of this trend.

In 2025, Gen Z protests against corruption, inadequate public services, and poor governance in Nepal, Indonesia, and Morocco brought to the forefront the need for governments to listen to their youth and tackle corruption and inequality. But as the difficulties of restoring rights in Bangladesh after years under an authoritarian government illustrates, gains won through public mobilization can easily be lost unless democratic participation and free expression remain unassailable.