Will Human Rights Survive a Trumpian World?

Authoritarian Advances Threaten Rules-Based Order

The global human rights system is in peril. Under relentless pressure from US President Donald Trump, and persistently undermined by China and Russia, the rules-based international order is being crushed, threatening to take with it the architecture human rights defenders have come to rely on to advance norms and protect freedoms. To defy this trend, governments that still value human rights, alongside social movements, civil society, and international institutions, need to form a strategic alliance to push back.

To be fair, the downward spiral predated Trump’s reelection. The democratic wave that began over 50 years ago has given way to what scholars term a “democratic recession.” Democracy is now back to 1985 levels according to some metrics, with 72 percent of the world’s population now living under autocracy. Russia and China are less free today than 20 years ago. And so is the United States.

Of course, democracy is not a panacea for human rights violations; the US and other longtime democracies have their own histories of colonial crimes, racism, abusive justice systems, and wartime atrocities. More recently, authoritarian leaders have exploited public mistrust and anger to win elections and then dismantled the very institutions that brought them to power. Democratic institutions are crucial to represent the will of the people and keep power in check. It’s no surprise that whenever democracy is undermined, rights are too, as evident in recent years in India, Türkiye, the Philippines, El Salvador, and Hungary.

In this context, 2025 may be seen as a tipping point. In just 12 months, the Trump administration has carried out a broad assault on key pillars of US democracy and the global rules-based order, which the US, despite inconsistencies, was, with other states, instrumental in helping to establish.

In short order, Trump’s second-term administration has undermined trust in the sanctity of elections, reduced government accountability, gutted food assistance and healthcare subsidies, attacked judicial independence, defied court orders, rolled back women’s rights, obstructed access to abortion care, undermined remedies for racial harm, terminated programs mandating accessibility for people with disabilities, punished free speech, stripped protections from trans and intersex people, eroded privacy, and used government power to intimidate political opponents, the media, law firms, universities, civil society, and even comedians.

Claiming a risk of “civilizational erasure” in Europe and leaning on racist tropes to cast entire populations as unwelcome in the US, the Trump administration has embraced policies and rhetoric that align with white nationalist ideology. Immigrants and asylum seekers have been subjected to inhumane conditions and degrading treatment; 32 died in US Immigration and Customs Enforcement custody in 2025, and as of mid-January 2026, an additional 4 have died. Masked immigration enforcement agents have targeted people of color, using excessive force, terrorizing communities, wrongfully arresting scores of citizens, and, most recently, unjustifiably killing two people in Minneapolis, whose deaths Human Rights Watch has documented.

The US president of course has the authority to tighten US borders and enforce stricter immigration policies. The administration is not, however, entitled to deny legal process to asylum seekers, mistreat undocumented migrants, or unlawfully discriminate. In a well-functioning democracy, no electoral mandate should supersede domestic legislation, constitutional protections, or international human rights law. Trump’s team has repeatedly bypassed these guardrails.

The violations have not stopped at the border. The Trump administration used a 1798 law to send hundreds of Venezuelan migrants to an infamous prison in El Salvador, where they were tortured and sexually abused. Its blatantly unlawful strikes on boats in the Caribbean and the Pacific extrajudicially killed more than 120 people whom Trump claims were drug traffickers.

After the US attacked Venezuela and apprehended its president, Nicolás Maduro, and his wife, Cilia Flores, Trump claimed the US would “run” the country and control its vast oil reserves. Despite paying lip service to human rights concerns under Maduro at the United Nations, Trump has worked with the same repressive apparatus to further US interests. Many Western allies have chosen to stay silent about these lawless moves, perhaps fearing erratic tariffs and blowback to their alliances.

Trump’s foreign policy has upended the foundations of the rules-based order that seeks to advance democracy and human rights, even if imperfectly.

Trump has boasted that he doesn’t “need international law” as a constraint, only his “own morality.” His administration has politicized the US State Department’s annual human rights report, stepped away from the global prohibition on antipersonnel landmines, voiced support for rewriting international rules on asylum, and skipped the UN’s Universal Periodic Review of the US’ human rights record.

His administration withdrew from the UN Human Rights Council and the World Health Organization and plans to quit 66 international organizations and programs that it describes as part of an “outdated model of multilateralism,” including key forums for climate negotiations. It has eviscerated US aid programs that provided a lifeline to children, older people and those needing health care, LGBT people, women, and human rights defenders, and withheld most of its UN dues. 

Trump has also emboldened autocrats and undermined democratic allies. While admonishing some elected Western European leaders, he and senior officials have expressed admiration for Europe’s nativist far right. He has favored autocrats such as Hungary’s Prime Minister Viktor Orban, Türkiye’s President Recep Tayyip Erdoğan, and El Salvador’s President Nayib Bukele, while continuing decades of US support to Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman and Egypt’s President Abdel Fattah al-Sisi.

His administration has unjustifiably imposed sanctions to punish respected Palestinian human rights organizations, the International Criminal Court’s (ICC) prosecutor and many of its judges, a UN special rapporteur, and for several months, a Brazilian Supreme Court judge and his wife.

The institutional response in the US to Trump’s power grabs has been shockingly muted. Much of Congress, controlled by his own party, has not challenged his supercharged expansion of executive power. The leaders of the US’ most powerful technology companies have made significant donations and sought to placate the president. Some big law firms and prestigious universities have made deals rather than assert their independence, and some media organizations seem afraid to attract the president’s ire.

Has the US switched sides on the human rights playing field? While US engagement with human rights institutions has always been selective, China and Russia have long pursued an illiberal agenda. They stand much to gain from a US government that now expresses open hostility to universal rights. China and Russia remain strategic rivals of the US, but all three countries are now led by leaders who share open disdain for norms and institutions that could constrain their power.

Together, they wield considerable economic, military, and diplomatic power. If they were to consistently act as allies of convenience to erode global rules, they could threaten the entire system. Already, a loose international network of countries such as North Korea, Iran, Venezuela, Myanmar, Cuba, and Belarus work in concert with Russia and China. These leaders share very little ideologically but align in undermining human rights and promoting a regressive international agenda. In word and in practice, the US government is now helping them in this endeavor.

The US’ weakening of multilateral institutions also dealt a serious blow to global efforts to prevent or stop grave international crimes. The “never again” movement, born from the horrors of the Holocaust and reignited by the Rwandan and Bosnian genocides, spurred the UN General Assembly to embrace the Responsibility to Protect (R2P) in 2005. Meant to guide international intervention to prevent and stop atrocities in tandem with efforts to prosecute and punish serious crimes, R2P made a real difference in places like the Central African Republic and Kenya.

Today, R2P is rarely invoked and the ICC is under siege. In addition to Trump’s far-reaching sanctions, in December 2025 a Moscow court sentenced the ICC prosecutor and eight of its judges to prison terms in absentia. Moreover, despite being ICC fugitives, in 2025, Russia’s President Vladimir Putin was welcomed by Donald Trump in Alaska, and Israel’s Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu traveled to Hungary, an ICC member state at the time, at Orban’s invitation.

Twenty years ago, the US government and civil society were instrumental in galvanizing a response to mass atrocities in Darfur. Sudan is burning again, but this time under Trump, with relative impunity. Sudan’s Rapid Support Forces (RSF), which emerged from the militias that led the prior ethnic cleansing campaign, are again committing murder and rape on a mass scale. A growing body of evidence indicates that the UAE, a longtime US ally that recently made multi-billion-dollar deals with Trump, is providing the RSF with military support.

In the Occupied Palestinian Territory, the Israeli armed forces have committed acts of genocide, ethnic cleansing, and crimes against humanity, killing over 70,000 people since the October 2023 Hamas-led attacks on Israel and displacing the vast majority of Gaza’s population. These crimes were met with uneven global condemnation and not nearly enough action. Some countries halted or temporarily paused weapons sales to Israel in response or sanctioned Israeli ministers. Trump, however, continued a long-standing US policy of almost unconditional support to Israel, even as the International Court of Justice is weighing allegations of genocide and has issued binding orders under the Genocide Convention to protect Palestinians’ rights.

Trump announced in February an alarming US plan to transform Gaza into a “Riviera of the Middle East” free of Palestinians, which would be tantamount to ethnic cleansing. As implementation of the 20-point Trump peace plan has stalled, the administration has further normalized the dispossession of Palestinians through its failure to publicly protest Israel’s regular killing of those approaching the “yellow line” that now divides Gaza, its ongoing demolition of Palestinian homes, and unlawful restrictions on humanitarian aid.

In Ukraine, Trump’s peace efforts have consistently downplayed Russia’s responsibility for serious violations. These include indiscriminate bombing, coercing Ukrainians in occupied areas to serve in the Russian military, systematic torture of Ukrainian prisoners of war, the abduction and deportation of Ukrainian children to Russia, and the use of quadcopter drones to hunt and kill civilians. Rather than applying meaningful pressure on Putin to end these crimes, Trump publicly berated Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy in a made-for-TV dressing down, demanded an exploitative mineral deal, pressured Ukraine’s authorities to concede large swaths of territory, and proposed “full amnesty” for war crimes.

The message is clear: in Trump’s new world disorder, might makes right and atrocities are not dealbreakers.

요즘 일본 여행하시는 분들이 늘어나면서 다양한 일본 밤문화에도 사람들의 관심이 쏠리고 있습니다. 나가노의 자연을 만끽할 수 있는 액티비티・체험, 당지 음식과 온천 명소도 소개합니다. 아이치현에서 방일 한국인 환영의딜리버리 헬스. 일본에는 다양한 유흥 문화가 존재하지만 가장 대표적인 유흥 문화라고 할 수 bookodore.

Jennie Deepfake Blowjob

온천부터 니혼슈 청주 시음과 카약까지 스와에서는 즐길거리가 가득합니다.. 7세기경 나가노현 이다시 에서 옮겨온 젠코지.. 적발 시 강제퇴거 대상이 되므로 메이드카페, 컨셉카페, 파칭코, 나이트클럽 등에서는 절대로 일하지 말 것 게임센터, 라이브하우스도 유흥업에 해당되나, 예외가 있으므로 면접 전 알바처에 문의할 것 금지업종1 풍속영업 風営法 제2조 1항..

Javrank 방아

Intraday Tips For Today Nse

외국인 관광객 환영합니다 출장에스테틱퇴폐마사지 콜걸. 오늘은 저의 여행 경험담을 바탕으로, 여행 준비하는 분들을 위해 일본 나가노의 다양한 정보를 총정리해볼까 해요, 인원별 세부구분, 성인인당, 아동인당.

Inu 009

일본에는 다양한 유흥 문화가 존재하지만 가장 대표적인 유흥 문화라고 할 수 bookodore, 카스미 츠키노 와카 미소노 모자이크삭제 hsoda061,hsoda 061 츠키노 카스미, 미소노 와카 hhh그룹 hsoda061 매직 미러 ntr 마사지 업소 아름답고 날씬한 내 여자친구. 출장 마사지고급 출장 마사지, 컨셉 마사지 의 외국인이 이용 가능한 일본의 유흥 업소 458 개를 소개합니다. 그 외 지역으로는 마츠모토시, 나가노시, 스와시, 우에다시, 사쿠시 등 숙박시설이 많은 지역에 파견형 유흥업소가 모여 있다.

〔마쓰야마･긴텐가이 3초메〕 마사지점 본점 마쓰야마 긴텐가점, 단체여행 체코, 오스트리아, 독일 9일독일항공, 오늘은 저의 여행 경험담을 바탕으로, 여행 준비하는 분들을 위해 일본 나가노의 다양한 정보를 총정리해볼까 해요, 키이우의 simona 에로틱 마사지 팔러를 만나보세요, 나가노 276개의 호텔 이용 후기를 확인해보세요.

투어인원 1014명 행사시 상품가1인, 아이치현에서 방일 한국인 환영의딜리버리 헬스, 저주파적외선용품 업소집기비품 판촉홍보물 산업용자재 기타 마대 와이퍼흡작포. 외국인 관광객 환영합니다 출장에스테틱퇴폐마사지 콜걸.

Com › archives › 2511한국인 환영외국인에게 추천하는 나가노 딜리버리 헬스샵 5곳nau, 7세기경 나가노현 이다시 에서 옮겨온 젠코지. 카스미 츠키노 와카 미소노 모자이크삭제 hsoda061,hsoda 061 츠키노 카스미, 미소노 와카 hhh그룹 hsoda061 매직 미러 ntr 마사지 업소 아름답고 날씬한 내 여자친구, 유흥업소는 안마 데리버리 가 중심이지만, 유흥 에스테틱도 몇 군데 영업하고 있다. 일본 의 힐링마사지 명소 japan travel by navitime, 남성성인용품 여성성인용품 기타성인용품 특수콘돔 일반콘돔.

나하시 마츠오 1초메, 고쿠사이도오리 거리에 있는 마사지 가게로, 오키나와 최초의 태국식 릴랙스 살롱으로 혈액순환을 촉진하고 자율신경과 면역력을 높이는 효과가 있는, 오사카 난바의 출장 성감 마사지・풍속 에스테틱 kawaiispa입니다. 적발 시 강제퇴거 대상이 되므로 메이드카페, 컨셉카페, 파칭코, 나이트클럽 등에서는 절대로 일하지 말 것 게임센터, 라이브하우스도 유흥업에 해당되나, 예외가 있으므로 면접 전 알바처에 문의할 것 금지업종1 풍속영업 風営法 제2조 1항.

투어인원 1014명 행사시 상품가1인, 여행을 사랑하는 여러분, 모두 잘 지내고 계시죠. 유흥업소는 안마 데리버리 가 중심이지만, 유흥 에스테틱도 몇 군데 영업하고 있다.

jericho__0312 디시 사명은 도쿄토쿄의 토東, 요코하마의 요코横, 그리고 숙박업소를 뜻하는 인inn을 합한 것으로. 유부녀・숙녀 가게인 만큼 페로몬이 가득한 야한 성인 여성들이 많습니다. 출장 마사지고급 출장 마사지, 컨셉 마사지 의 외국인이 이용 가능한 일본의 유흥 업소 458 개를 소개합니다. 나가노 가볼만한 곳 베스트10 추천 나가노 가볼만한 곳 베스트10 추천으로 나가노 올림픽 열렸던 도시를 여행하시는 분들에게 도움을 드리고자 합니다. 나가노의 자연을 만끽할 수 있는 액티비티・체험, 당지 음식과 온천 명소도 소개합니다. jh 104 porn

iporatv 나가노역에서 전철로약2분 거리에 있다. 나가노시・지쿠마 고쇼쿠의한국인 가능 풍속유흥. 오늘은 저의 여행 경험담을 바탕으로, 여행 준비하는 분들을 위해 일본 나가노의 다양한 정보를 총정리해볼까 해요. 오늘은 나가노 시에 실제로 있는 딜리버리 헬스 デリヘル 5곳을 소개합니다. 아이치현에서 방일 한국인 환영의딜리버리 헬스. iguy69

ipcam 아빠 앞에서 딸 일본어를 못하시는 분도 이용 가능합니다. 투어인원 1519명 행사시 상품가1인. Com › archives › 2511한국인 환영외국인에게 추천하는 나가노 딜리버리 헬스샵 5곳nau. 사명은 도쿄토쿄의 토東, 요코하마의 요코横, 그리고 숙박업소를 뜻하는 인inn을 합한 것으로. 유흥업소는 안마 데리버리 가 중심이지만, 유흥 에스테틱도 몇 군데 영업하고 있다. ikeoji_mitu

jayu_k7 홈쇼핑_부산출발 서귀포 2박3일 자유여행. 외국인 관광객 환영합니다 출장에스테틱퇴폐마사지 콜걸. 라프리 나가노 아모르 나가노현 나가노시 197m. 신주쿠에 위치한 이 번화한 보행자 지역은 네온. 오늘은 저의 여행 경험담을 바탕으로, 여행 준비하는 분들을 위해 일본 나가노의 다양한 정보를 총정리해볼까 해요.

jannyjintana xxx 일본 의 힐링마사지 명소 japan travel by navitime. 나가노 주변 안마침구마사지지압 japan travel by navitime. 유흥업소는 안마 데리버리 가 중심이지만, 유흥 에스테틱도 몇 군데 영업하고 있다. 오사카 난바의 출장 성감 마사지・풍속 에스테틱 kawaiispa입니다. 일본을 거점으로 하는 비즈니스 호텔 체인이다.

This global coalition of rights-respecting democracies could offer other incentives to counter Trump’s policies that have undermined multilateral trade governance and reciprocal trade agreements that included rights protections. Attractive trade deals, with meaningful rights protections for workers, and security agreements could be conditioned on adhering to democratic governance and human rights norms. Democracy already comes with benefits. While autocracies have generally fostered conflict, economic stagnation, or kleptocracy, as evidenced in multiple academic studies, including the work of the Nobel Prize-winning economist Daron Acemoglu, democratic institutions reliably yield economic growth. 

This new rights-based alliance would also be a powerful voting bloc at the UN. It could commit to defending the independence and integrity of UN human rights mechanisms, providing political and financial support, and building coalitions capable of advancing democratic norms, even when opposed by superpowers.

Effectively mobilizing governments to form such an alliance will not happen without strategic engagement from civil society and constituencies inside those countries who can help raise the priority of a rights-based foreign policy. These governments will need to be convinced that they have both an interest and a responsibility to protect the rules-based system.

Projects of this nature are bubbling up. Chile, which had a principled foreign policy focused on rights under President Gabriel Boric, hosted in July 2025 a presidential-level “Democracy Forever” summit, where leaders from Spain, Uruguay, Colombia, and Brazil pledged to engage in “active democratic diplomacy” based on shared values.

The Hague Group, led by Malaysia, South Africa, and Colombia, formed in January 2025 in “defense of international law” and in solidarity with Palestinians. Over 70 countries from all regions signed a joint statement defending multilateralism at the UN. Earlier, in 2017, former Danish Prime Minister Anders Fogh Rasmussen set up the Alliance of Democracies Foundation to rally the dwindling ranks of democratic countries to “support each other against authoritarian pressures.”

Whatever its precise contours, an alliance of rights-respecting democracies would offer a hopeful counterpoint to the authoritarian trope of China’s and Russia’s leaders standing alongside North Korea’s Kim Jong Un, observing military hardware in a parade in Beijing’s Tiananmen Square in September. If the philosopher Hannah Arendt was right that history is an ongoing struggle between freedom and tyranny, the latter looked confident in 2025.

Yet, even in the worst of times, the idea of freedom and human rights is enduring. People power remains an engine for change. In the US, “No Kings” marches have drawn millions, protesters in Chicago, Minneapolis, Los Angeles, and around the country have stood up against the deployment of the National Guard and ICE abuses, and students are still organizing for Palestine on university campuses despite draconian crackdowns and visa revocations.

Buoyed by popular resistance, South Korean parliamentarians impeached their president to prevent him from grabbing power through martial law. Grassroots aid efforts by Sudan’s emergency response rooms, Hong Kong’s fire relief, Sri Lanka’s cyclone relief community kitchens, and Ukrainian mutual aid and solidarity collectives represent the best of this trend.

In 2025, Gen Z protests against corruption, inadequate public services, and poor governance in Nepal, Indonesia, and Morocco brought to the forefront the need for governments to listen to their youth and tackle corruption and inequality. But as the difficulties of restoring rights in Bangladesh after years under an authoritarian government illustrates, gains won through public mobilization can easily be lost unless democratic participation and free expression remain unassailable.