Will Human Rights Survive a Trumpian World?

Authoritarian Advances Threaten Rules-Based Order

The global human rights system is in peril. Under relentless pressure from US President Donald Trump, and persistently undermined by China and Russia, the rules-based international order is being crushed, threatening to take with it the architecture human rights defenders have come to rely on to advance norms and protect freedoms. To defy this trend, governments that still value human rights, alongside social movements, civil society, and international institutions, need to form a strategic alliance to push back.

To be fair, the downward spiral predated Trump’s reelection. The democratic wave that began over 50 years ago has given way to what scholars term a “democratic recession.” Democracy is now back to 1985 levels according to some metrics, with 72 percent of the world’s population now living under autocracy. Russia and China are less free today than 20 years ago. And so is the United States.

Of course, democracy is not a panacea for human rights violations; the US and other longtime democracies have their own histories of colonial crimes, racism, abusive justice systems, and wartime atrocities. More recently, authoritarian leaders have exploited public mistrust and anger to win elections and then dismantled the very institutions that brought them to power. Democratic institutions are crucial to represent the will of the people and keep power in check. It’s no surprise that whenever democracy is undermined, rights are too, as evident in recent years in India, Türkiye, the Philippines, El Salvador, and Hungary.

In this context, 2025 may be seen as a tipping point. In just 12 months, the Trump administration has carried out a broad assault on key pillars of US democracy and the global rules-based order, which the US, despite inconsistencies, was, with other states, instrumental in helping to establish.

In short order, Trump’s second-term administration has undermined trust in the sanctity of elections, reduced government accountability, gutted food assistance and healthcare subsidies, attacked judicial independence, defied court orders, rolled back women’s rights, obstructed access to abortion care, undermined remedies for racial harm, terminated programs mandating accessibility for people with disabilities, punished free speech, stripped protections from trans and intersex people, eroded privacy, and used government power to intimidate political opponents, the media, law firms, universities, civil society, and even comedians.

Claiming a risk of “civilizational erasure” in Europe and leaning on racist tropes to cast entire populations as unwelcome in the US, the Trump administration has embraced policies and rhetoric that align with white nationalist ideology. Immigrants and asylum seekers have been subjected to inhumane conditions and degrading treatment; 32 died in US Immigration and Customs Enforcement custody in 2025, and as of mid-January 2026, an additional 4 have died. Masked immigration enforcement agents have targeted people of color, using excessive force, terrorizing communities, wrongfully arresting scores of citizens, and, most recently, unjustifiably killing two people in Minneapolis, whose deaths Human Rights Watch has documented.

The US president of course has the authority to tighten US borders and enforce stricter immigration policies. The administration is not, however, entitled to deny legal process to asylum seekers, mistreat undocumented migrants, or unlawfully discriminate. In a well-functioning democracy, no electoral mandate should supersede domestic legislation, constitutional protections, or international human rights law. Trump’s team has repeatedly bypassed these guardrails.

The violations have not stopped at the border. The Trump administration used a 1798 law to send hundreds of Venezuelan migrants to an infamous prison in El Salvador, where they were tortured and sexually abused. Its blatantly unlawful strikes on boats in the Caribbean and the Pacific extrajudicially killed more than 120 people whom Trump claims were drug traffickers.

After the US attacked Venezuela and apprehended its president, Nicolás Maduro, and his wife, Cilia Flores, Trump claimed the US would “run” the country and control its vast oil reserves. Despite paying lip service to human rights concerns under Maduro at the United Nations, Trump has worked with the same repressive apparatus to further US interests. Many Western allies have chosen to stay silent about these lawless moves, perhaps fearing erratic tariffs and blowback to their alliances.

Trump’s foreign policy has upended the foundations of the rules-based order that seeks to advance democracy and human rights, even if imperfectly.

Trump has boasted that he doesn’t “need international law” as a constraint, only his “own morality.” His administration has politicized the US State Department’s annual human rights report, stepped away from the global prohibition on antipersonnel landmines, voiced support for rewriting international rules on asylum, and skipped the UN’s Universal Periodic Review of the US’ human rights record.

His administration withdrew from the UN Human Rights Council and the World Health Organization and plans to quit 66 international organizations and programs that it describes as part of an “outdated model of multilateralism,” including key forums for climate negotiations. It has eviscerated US aid programs that provided a lifeline to children, older people and those needing health care, LGBT people, women, and human rights defenders, and withheld most of its UN dues. 

Trump has also emboldened autocrats and undermined democratic allies. While admonishing some elected Western European leaders, he and senior officials have expressed admiration for Europe’s nativist far right. He has favored autocrats such as Hungary’s Prime Minister Viktor Orban, Türkiye’s President Recep Tayyip Erdoğan, and El Salvador’s President Nayib Bukele, while continuing decades of US support to Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman and Egypt’s President Abdel Fattah al-Sisi.

His administration has unjustifiably imposed sanctions to punish respected Palestinian human rights organizations, the International Criminal Court’s (ICC) prosecutor and many of its judges, a UN special rapporteur, and for several months, a Brazilian Supreme Court judge and his wife.

The institutional response in the US to Trump’s power grabs has been shockingly muted. Much of Congress, controlled by his own party, has not challenged his supercharged expansion of executive power. The leaders of the US’ most powerful technology companies have made significant donations and sought to placate the president. Some big law firms and prestigious universities have made deals rather than assert their independence, and some media organizations seem afraid to attract the president’s ire.

Has the US switched sides on the human rights playing field? While US engagement with human rights institutions has always been selective, China and Russia have long pursued an illiberal agenda. They stand much to gain from a US government that now expresses open hostility to universal rights. China and Russia remain strategic rivals of the US, but all three countries are now led by leaders who share open disdain for norms and institutions that could constrain their power.

Together, they wield considerable economic, military, and diplomatic power. If they were to consistently act as allies of convenience to erode global rules, they could threaten the entire system. Already, a loose international network of countries such as North Korea, Iran, Venezuela, Myanmar, Cuba, and Belarus work in concert with Russia and China. These leaders share very little ideologically but align in undermining human rights and promoting a regressive international agenda. In word and in practice, the US government is now helping them in this endeavor.

The US’ weakening of multilateral institutions also dealt a serious blow to global efforts to prevent or stop grave international crimes. The “never again” movement, born from the horrors of the Holocaust and reignited by the Rwandan and Bosnian genocides, spurred the UN General Assembly to embrace the Responsibility to Protect (R2P) in 2005. Meant to guide international intervention to prevent and stop atrocities in tandem with efforts to prosecute and punish serious crimes, R2P made a real difference in places like the Central African Republic and Kenya.

Today, R2P is rarely invoked and the ICC is under siege. In addition to Trump’s far-reaching sanctions, in December 2025 a Moscow court sentenced the ICC prosecutor and eight of its judges to prison terms in absentia. Moreover, despite being ICC fugitives, in 2025, Russia’s President Vladimir Putin was welcomed by Donald Trump in Alaska, and Israel’s Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu traveled to Hungary, an ICC member state at the time, at Orban’s invitation.

Twenty years ago, the US government and civil society were instrumental in galvanizing a response to mass atrocities in Darfur. Sudan is burning again, but this time under Trump, with relative impunity. Sudan’s Rapid Support Forces (RSF), which emerged from the militias that led the prior ethnic cleansing campaign, are again committing murder and rape on a mass scale. A growing body of evidence indicates that the UAE, a longtime US ally that recently made multi-billion-dollar deals with Trump, is providing the RSF with military support.

In the Occupied Palestinian Territory, the Israeli armed forces have committed acts of genocide, ethnic cleansing, and crimes against humanity, killing over 70,000 people since the October 2023 Hamas-led attacks on Israel and displacing the vast majority of Gaza’s population. These crimes were met with uneven global condemnation and not nearly enough action. Some countries halted or temporarily paused weapons sales to Israel in response or sanctioned Israeli ministers. Trump, however, continued a long-standing US policy of almost unconditional support to Israel, even as the International Court of Justice is weighing allegations of genocide and has issued binding orders under the Genocide Convention to protect Palestinians’ rights.

Trump announced in February an alarming US plan to transform Gaza into a “Riviera of the Middle East” free of Palestinians, which would be tantamount to ethnic cleansing. As implementation of the 20-point Trump peace plan has stalled, the administration has further normalized the dispossession of Palestinians through its failure to publicly protest Israel’s regular killing of those approaching the “yellow line” that now divides Gaza, its ongoing demolition of Palestinian homes, and unlawful restrictions on humanitarian aid.

In Ukraine, Trump’s peace efforts have consistently downplayed Russia’s responsibility for serious violations. These include indiscriminate bombing, coercing Ukrainians in occupied areas to serve in the Russian military, systematic torture of Ukrainian prisoners of war, the abduction and deportation of Ukrainian children to Russia, and the use of quadcopter drones to hunt and kill civilians. Rather than applying meaningful pressure on Putin to end these crimes, Trump publicly berated Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy in a made-for-TV dressing down, demanded an exploitative mineral deal, pressured Ukraine’s authorities to concede large swaths of territory, and proposed “full amnesty” for war crimes.

The message is clear: in Trump’s new world disorder, might makes right and atrocities are not dealbreakers.

25 163 3 4106 일반 오늘도 유랑의 달 보러왔네요. Dc official app 타인의 권리를 침해하거나 명예를 훼손하는 댓글은 운영원칙 및 관련 법률에 제재를 받을 수 있습니다. 02 80 0 4112 일반 2023년 1월 30일자 인스타 1 예북왕 01. Com › mgallery › board히로세 스즈 広瀬すず 겨땀.

Sammy 얼굴

Sava Schultz Nude

여름 웹화보 프로젝트 공개 118 7000원에 치킨 10번 콜라만 수북 배민 쿠폰.. 25 4413 일반 수수한 스즈 1 인중냄새페티쉬 08.. 몸매 ㅈㄴ 좋음 육덕이랍시고 빨리는 돼지 체형도 아니고 그냥 들어갈덴 들어가고 나올땐 공격적으로 나온 체형임게다가.. Net › tags › 스즈갤스즈갤の人気イラストやマンガ pixiv..

Rplay Suzu

S 성향 남자 디시

의젖인지 긴가민가한 의젖 a등급 의젖인데 모양은 이쁜 의젖 b등급 가운데 쩍 갈라져서 공 두개 덜렁거리는 모세의 기젖 f 등급대표적인게 아오이츠카사 츠바사 마이 미나모 등. 28 140 0 4107 일반 까불이 1 예북왕 01. 미우라 사쿠라 아직도 참이라는건 좆 무뇌아새끼 아님. 배우야마자키 켄토28와 여배우히로세 스즈25의 사랑의 행방은 어떻게 될까. 10 2207 세숙ars 거기 진짜 대단하던디 ㅋㅋㅋㅋ 일단 세븐틴 잡지 2014년 12월호 인것까지는 알았는데 이거 짤 정리해둔 사람이 없는듯 ㅜㅜ thefiend 2021.

Net › tags › 스즈갤스즈갤の人気イラストやマンガ pixiv. 25 4413 일반 수수한 스즈 1 인중냄새페티쉬 08. 오랜만 ‘이상순♥’ 이효리 공중화장실 사진 공개되자 난리난 이유 정형돈, 무도 멤버들과 불화설 일축멤버들과 통화하며 울어 이것이 섹시 엘프.

도쿄 안에서 정확히 어디 사는지 알고있음 실제로 봤는데 키는 좀 작은데 얼굴은 진짜 귀엽게 생김구름 낀 날이었는데. Dc official app 타인의 권리를 침해하거나 명예를 훼손하는 댓글은 운영원칙 및 관련 법률에 제재를 받을 수 있습니다. 06 109 1 4113 일반 스즈갤 개오랜만인데 ㅇㅇ121. 25 163 3 4106 일반 오늘도 유랑의 달 보러왔네요. 의젖인지 긴가민가한 의젖 a등급 의젖인데 모양은 이쁜 의젖 b등급 가운데 쩍 갈라져서 공 두개 덜렁거리는 모세의 기젖 f 등급대표적인게 아오이츠카사 츠바사 마이 미나모 등.

23 1136 으아슷짱 ㅎㅎ스즈갤 저희가 많이 보죠 으아슷짱 2021.. Com › mgallery › board스즈 결혼 드레스 히로세스즈 마이너 갤러리.. 엘라 비주얼로 맥심 콘테스트 돌풍 백상예술대상 5일 개최, 선재부터 폭싹까지 쟁쟁한 수상후보 출격.. 2호선에서 다소 경박하고 시끄러운 허스키한 여자목소리 들리길래 보니까 까만피부 뭔가 본능적 친밀함 느껴지길래 보니..

스즈 켄토랑 잘어울렸는데 켄토랑 헤어지고 15살 연상 아저씨랑 불륜. Com › mgallery › board히로세 스즈 広瀬すず 겨땀. 이건 상상할수 없음 dc official app, 배우야마자키 켄토28와 여배우히로세 스즈25의 사랑의 행방은 어떻게 될까, Dc official app 타인의 권리를 침해하거나 명예를 훼손하는 댓글은 운영원칙 및 관련 법률에 제재를 받을 수 있습니다, ㅎㅎ 타인의 권리를 침해하거나 명예를 훼손하는 댓글은 운영원칙 및 관련 법률에 제재를 받을 수 있습니다.

Sasaki Aki

24 865 5 3023 공지 스즈 예능&방송 날짜 정리 95% 210317 수정중47 히로세스즈쨩 21. Com › mgallery › board히로세스즈님 오늘 생일 축하드립니다. 여름 웹화보 프로젝트 공개 118 7000원에 치킨 10번 콜라만 수북 배민 쿠폰, Com › 3774539480히로세 스즈 포토북입니다.

simpcity.sju ㅈㄱㄴ ㅠㅠㅠ 타인의 권리를 침해하거나 명예를 훼손하는 댓글은 운영원칙 및 관련 법률에 제재를 받을 수 있습니다. 도쿄 안에서 정확히 어디 사는지 알고있음 실제로 봤는데 키는 좀 작은데 얼굴은 진짜 귀엽게 생김구름 낀 날이었는데. 흙수저 김영란에서 명품 스펙 부세미가 되기까지, 반전 매력 포착. 28 137 0 4107 일반 까불이 1 예북왕 01. 28 140 0 4107 일반 까불이 1 예북왕 01. ruruka leaked

sissy 섹트 06 105 1 4113 일반 스즈갤 개오랜만인데 ㅇㅇ121. Com › 3515746279ㅇㅎ 사이즈 맞는게 없어서 벗고다님 기타 스포츠 에펨코리아. 이건 상상할수 없음 dc official app. В начало курсы найти поиск курса поиск курса поиск курса поиск курса. 25 163 3 4106 일반 오늘도 유랑의 달 보러왔네요. ry sotwe

semi-nude 분노 파파고번역20150924 212733오래 기다리셨습니다영화 분노 올업한달간. Shift+enter 키를 동시에 누르면 줄바꿈이 됩니다. 엘라 비주얼로 맥심 콘테스트 돌풍 백상예술대상 5일 개최, 선재부터 폭싹까지 쟁쟁한 수상후보 출격. 미우라 사쿠라 아직도 참이라는건 좆 무뇌아새끼 아님. 오랜만 ‘이상순♥’ 이효리 공중화장실 사진 공개되자 난리난 이유 정형돈, 무도 멤버들과 불화설 일축멤버들과 통화하며 울어 이것이 섹시 엘프. site_fornitureindustrialiforind.it

sexyminji12 nude 엘라 비주얼로 맥심 콘테스트 돌풍 백상예술대상 5일 개최, 선재부터 폭싹까지 쟁쟁한 수상후보 출격. Com › 3515746279ㅇㅎ 사이즈 맞는게 없어서 벗고다님 기타 스포츠 에펨코리아. 주연 영화 골든카무이쿠보모쇼 감독, 내년 1월 19일 공개 비주얼이 30일 발표됐다. 의젖인지 긴가민가한 의젖 a등급 의젖인데 모양은 이쁜 의젖 b등급 가운데 쩍 갈라져서 공 두개 덜렁거리는 모세의 기젖 f 등급대표적인게 아오이츠카사 츠바사 마이 미나모 등. 다좋지만 이거 두개가 젤좋음ㅎㅎ 위에 광고는 진짜 레전드 dc official app.

sj104 porn 으아슷짱 스즈갤 부매니저 분이 완전 알파고인데 물어보시면 아실듯. 23 1136 으아슷짱 ㅎㅎ스즈갤 저희가 많이 보죠 으아슷짱 2021. Shift+enter 키를 동시에 누르면 줄바꿈이 됩니다. 여름 웹화보 프로젝트 공개 118 7000원에 치킨 10번 콜라만 수북 배민 쿠폰. Jpg 33460_571694758_n.

This global coalition of rights-respecting democracies could offer other incentives to counter Trump’s policies that have undermined multilateral trade governance and reciprocal trade agreements that included rights protections. Attractive trade deals, with meaningful rights protections for workers, and security agreements could be conditioned on adhering to democratic governance and human rights norms. Democracy already comes with benefits. While autocracies have generally fostered conflict, economic stagnation, or kleptocracy, as evidenced in multiple academic studies, including the work of the Nobel Prize-winning economist Daron Acemoglu, democratic institutions reliably yield economic growth. 

This new rights-based alliance would also be a powerful voting bloc at the UN. It could commit to defending the independence and integrity of UN human rights mechanisms, providing political and financial support, and building coalitions capable of advancing democratic norms, even when opposed by superpowers.

Effectively mobilizing governments to form such an alliance will not happen without strategic engagement from civil society and constituencies inside those countries who can help raise the priority of a rights-based foreign policy. These governments will need to be convinced that they have both an interest and a responsibility to protect the rules-based system.

Projects of this nature are bubbling up. Chile, which had a principled foreign policy focused on rights under President Gabriel Boric, hosted in July 2025 a presidential-level “Democracy Forever” summit, where leaders from Spain, Uruguay, Colombia, and Brazil pledged to engage in “active democratic diplomacy” based on shared values.

The Hague Group, led by Malaysia, South Africa, and Colombia, formed in January 2025 in “defense of international law” and in solidarity with Palestinians. Over 70 countries from all regions signed a joint statement defending multilateralism at the UN. Earlier, in 2017, former Danish Prime Minister Anders Fogh Rasmussen set up the Alliance of Democracies Foundation to rally the dwindling ranks of democratic countries to “support each other against authoritarian pressures.”

Whatever its precise contours, an alliance of rights-respecting democracies would offer a hopeful counterpoint to the authoritarian trope of China’s and Russia’s leaders standing alongside North Korea’s Kim Jong Un, observing military hardware in a parade in Beijing’s Tiananmen Square in September. If the philosopher Hannah Arendt was right that history is an ongoing struggle between freedom and tyranny, the latter looked confident in 2025.

Yet, even in the worst of times, the idea of freedom and human rights is enduring. People power remains an engine for change. In the US, “No Kings” marches have drawn millions, protesters in Chicago, Minneapolis, Los Angeles, and around the country have stood up against the deployment of the National Guard and ICE abuses, and students are still organizing for Palestine on university campuses despite draconian crackdowns and visa revocations.

Buoyed by popular resistance, South Korean parliamentarians impeached their president to prevent him from grabbing power through martial law. Grassroots aid efforts by Sudan’s emergency response rooms, Hong Kong’s fire relief, Sri Lanka’s cyclone relief community kitchens, and Ukrainian mutual aid and solidarity collectives represent the best of this trend.

In 2025, Gen Z protests against corruption, inadequate public services, and poor governance in Nepal, Indonesia, and Morocco brought to the forefront the need for governments to listen to their youth and tackle corruption and inequality. But as the difficulties of restoring rights in Bangladesh after years under an authoritarian government illustrates, gains won through public mobilization can easily be lost unless democratic participation and free expression remain unassailable.