Will Human Rights Survive a Trumpian World?

Authoritarian Advances Threaten Rules-Based Order

The global human rights system is in peril. Under relentless pressure from US President Donald Trump, and persistently undermined by China and Russia, the rules-based international order is being crushed, threatening to take with it the architecture human rights defenders have come to rely on to advance norms and protect freedoms. To defy this trend, governments that still value human rights, alongside social movements, civil society, and international institutions, need to form a strategic alliance to push back.

To be fair, the downward spiral predated Trump’s reelection. The democratic wave that began over 50 years ago has given way to what scholars term a “democratic recession.” Democracy is now back to 1985 levels according to some metrics, with 72 percent of the world’s population now living under autocracy. Russia and China are less free today than 20 years ago. And so is the United States.

Of course, democracy is not a panacea for human rights violations; the US and other longtime democracies have their own histories of colonial crimes, racism, abusive justice systems, and wartime atrocities. More recently, authoritarian leaders have exploited public mistrust and anger to win elections and then dismantled the very institutions that brought them to power. Democratic institutions are crucial to represent the will of the people and keep power in check. It’s no surprise that whenever democracy is undermined, rights are too, as evident in recent years in India, Türkiye, the Philippines, El Salvador, and Hungary.

In this context, 2025 may be seen as a tipping point. In just 12 months, the Trump administration has carried out a broad assault on key pillars of US democracy and the global rules-based order, which the US, despite inconsistencies, was, with other states, instrumental in helping to establish.

In short order, Trump’s second-term administration has undermined trust in the sanctity of elections, reduced government accountability, gutted food assistance and healthcare subsidies, attacked judicial independence, defied court orders, rolled back women’s rights, obstructed access to abortion care, undermined remedies for racial harm, terminated programs mandating accessibility for people with disabilities, punished free speech, stripped protections from trans and intersex people, eroded privacy, and used government power to intimidate political opponents, the media, law firms, universities, civil society, and even comedians.

Claiming a risk of “civilizational erasure” in Europe and leaning on racist tropes to cast entire populations as unwelcome in the US, the Trump administration has embraced policies and rhetoric that align with white nationalist ideology. Immigrants and asylum seekers have been subjected to inhumane conditions and degrading treatment; 32 died in US Immigration and Customs Enforcement custody in 2025, and as of mid-January 2026, an additional 4 have died. Masked immigration enforcement agents have targeted people of color, using excessive force, terrorizing communities, wrongfully arresting scores of citizens, and, most recently, unjustifiably killing two people in Minneapolis, whose deaths Human Rights Watch has documented.

The US president of course has the authority to tighten US borders and enforce stricter immigration policies. The administration is not, however, entitled to deny legal process to asylum seekers, mistreat undocumented migrants, or unlawfully discriminate. In a well-functioning democracy, no electoral mandate should supersede domestic legislation, constitutional protections, or international human rights law. Trump’s team has repeatedly bypassed these guardrails.

The violations have not stopped at the border. The Trump administration used a 1798 law to send hundreds of Venezuelan migrants to an infamous prison in El Salvador, where they were tortured and sexually abused. Its blatantly unlawful strikes on boats in the Caribbean and the Pacific extrajudicially killed more than 120 people whom Trump claims were drug traffickers.

After the US attacked Venezuela and apprehended its president, Nicolás Maduro, and his wife, Cilia Flores, Trump claimed the US would “run” the country and control its vast oil reserves. Despite paying lip service to human rights concerns under Maduro at the United Nations, Trump has worked with the same repressive apparatus to further US interests. Many Western allies have chosen to stay silent about these lawless moves, perhaps fearing erratic tariffs and blowback to their alliances.

Trump’s foreign policy has upended the foundations of the rules-based order that seeks to advance democracy and human rights, even if imperfectly.

Trump has boasted that he doesn’t “need international law” as a constraint, only his “own morality.” His administration has politicized the US State Department’s annual human rights report, stepped away from the global prohibition on antipersonnel landmines, voiced support for rewriting international rules on asylum, and skipped the UN’s Universal Periodic Review of the US’ human rights record.

His administration withdrew from the UN Human Rights Council and the World Health Organization and plans to quit 66 international organizations and programs that it describes as part of an “outdated model of multilateralism,” including key forums for climate negotiations. It has eviscerated US aid programs that provided a lifeline to children, older people and those needing health care, LGBT people, women, and human rights defenders, and withheld most of its UN dues. 

Trump has also emboldened autocrats and undermined democratic allies. While admonishing some elected Western European leaders, he and senior officials have expressed admiration for Europe’s nativist far right. He has favored autocrats such as Hungary’s Prime Minister Viktor Orban, Türkiye’s President Recep Tayyip Erdoğan, and El Salvador’s President Nayib Bukele, while continuing decades of US support to Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman and Egypt’s President Abdel Fattah al-Sisi.

His administration has unjustifiably imposed sanctions to punish respected Palestinian human rights organizations, the International Criminal Court’s (ICC) prosecutor and many of its judges, a UN special rapporteur, and for several months, a Brazilian Supreme Court judge and his wife.

The institutional response in the US to Trump’s power grabs has been shockingly muted. Much of Congress, controlled by his own party, has not challenged his supercharged expansion of executive power. The leaders of the US’ most powerful technology companies have made significant donations and sought to placate the president. Some big law firms and prestigious universities have made deals rather than assert their independence, and some media organizations seem afraid to attract the president’s ire.

Has the US switched sides on the human rights playing field? While US engagement with human rights institutions has always been selective, China and Russia have long pursued an illiberal agenda. They stand much to gain from a US government that now expresses open hostility to universal rights. China and Russia remain strategic rivals of the US, but all three countries are now led by leaders who share open disdain for norms and institutions that could constrain their power.

Together, they wield considerable economic, military, and diplomatic power. If they were to consistently act as allies of convenience to erode global rules, they could threaten the entire system. Already, a loose international network of countries such as North Korea, Iran, Venezuela, Myanmar, Cuba, and Belarus work in concert with Russia and China. These leaders share very little ideologically but align in undermining human rights and promoting a regressive international agenda. In word and in practice, the US government is now helping them in this endeavor.

The US’ weakening of multilateral institutions also dealt a serious blow to global efforts to prevent or stop grave international crimes. The “never again” movement, born from the horrors of the Holocaust and reignited by the Rwandan and Bosnian genocides, spurred the UN General Assembly to embrace the Responsibility to Protect (R2P) in 2005. Meant to guide international intervention to prevent and stop atrocities in tandem with efforts to prosecute and punish serious crimes, R2P made a real difference in places like the Central African Republic and Kenya.

Today, R2P is rarely invoked and the ICC is under siege. In addition to Trump’s far-reaching sanctions, in December 2025 a Moscow court sentenced the ICC prosecutor and eight of its judges to prison terms in absentia. Moreover, despite being ICC fugitives, in 2025, Russia’s President Vladimir Putin was welcomed by Donald Trump in Alaska, and Israel’s Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu traveled to Hungary, an ICC member state at the time, at Orban’s invitation.

Twenty years ago, the US government and civil society were instrumental in galvanizing a response to mass atrocities in Darfur. Sudan is burning again, but this time under Trump, with relative impunity. Sudan’s Rapid Support Forces (RSF), which emerged from the militias that led the prior ethnic cleansing campaign, are again committing murder and rape on a mass scale. A growing body of evidence indicates that the UAE, a longtime US ally that recently made multi-billion-dollar deals with Trump, is providing the RSF with military support.

In the Occupied Palestinian Territory, the Israeli armed forces have committed acts of genocide, ethnic cleansing, and crimes against humanity, killing over 70,000 people since the October 2023 Hamas-led attacks on Israel and displacing the vast majority of Gaza’s population. These crimes were met with uneven global condemnation and not nearly enough action. Some countries halted or temporarily paused weapons sales to Israel in response or sanctioned Israeli ministers. Trump, however, continued a long-standing US policy of almost unconditional support to Israel, even as the International Court of Justice is weighing allegations of genocide and has issued binding orders under the Genocide Convention to protect Palestinians’ rights.

Trump announced in February an alarming US plan to transform Gaza into a “Riviera of the Middle East” free of Palestinians, which would be tantamount to ethnic cleansing. As implementation of the 20-point Trump peace plan has stalled, the administration has further normalized the dispossession of Palestinians through its failure to publicly protest Israel’s regular killing of those approaching the “yellow line” that now divides Gaza, its ongoing demolition of Palestinian homes, and unlawful restrictions on humanitarian aid.

In Ukraine, Trump’s peace efforts have consistently downplayed Russia’s responsibility for serious violations. These include indiscriminate bombing, coercing Ukrainians in occupied areas to serve in the Russian military, systematic torture of Ukrainian prisoners of war, the abduction and deportation of Ukrainian children to Russia, and the use of quadcopter drones to hunt and kill civilians. Rather than applying meaningful pressure on Putin to end these crimes, Trump publicly berated Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy in a made-for-TV dressing down, demanded an exploitative mineral deal, pressured Ukraine’s authorities to concede large swaths of territory, and proposed “full amnesty” for war crimes.

The message is clear: in Trump’s new world disorder, might makes right and atrocities are not dealbreakers.

Pimblett가 1월 24일 한국시간 25일 미국 라스베이거스 tmobile arena에서 개최됩니다. 저스틴 게이치 vs 패디 핌블렛 낙서장 mma 마이너 갤러리. Com › pyh832 › videosufc 324 정말 화끈했던 게이치 vs 핌블렛 풀버전 syoutu. 29 조회 4702 추천 106 10 이미지오늘 경기로 재평가 되는 담력 goat 일반인 일반 ㅇㅇ 06.

설사 여자 급똥 드라마

삿포로 클럽

서여진 여장갤

Ufc 324 정말 화끈했던 게이치 vs 핌블렛 풀버전 syoutu.. 1,2라운드부터 스텝좀 밟으면서 움직였으면 괜찮았을텐데 나는 초반보고서 핌블렛 왜저러나 싶었음.. 김대환 저주는 승패만 결부된 게 아님..

성형외과 실장 현실 디시

In+15 하지만 토푸리아 vs 핌블렛의 감정. Ufc 324 정말 화끈했던 게이치 vs 핌블렛 풀버전 syoutu, 위트먼 핌블렛 도발이 불쾌했음 ufc on espn종합격투기. 게이치27승 5패는 지난 25일이하 한국시간 미국 네바다주 라스베이거스 티모바일 아레나에서 열린 ‘ufc 324 게이치 vs 핌블렛’ 메인 이벤트에서 패디 핌블렛31. 200 2050 106 7 1096722 일반 또 킹짱피날 억까하지 유붕이61. 종합격투기 선수 일리아 토푸리아 의 선수 경력을 정리한 문서.

Ufc 스타 패디 핌블렛31이 저스틴 게이치38에게 완패를 당한 후 병원으로 급히 이송됐다, In+15 하지만 토푸리아 vs 핌블렛의 감정. Days ago ufc 324 게이치 vs 핌블렛는 2026년 1월 25일에 개최되었으며 미국 네바다 라스베이거스 t모바일 아레나에서 총 11경기가 진행되었습니다. 일반 패디 핌블렛 가발을 쓴 마이클 챈들러 모기고문기술자 2025. 저스틴 게이치 vs 패디 핌블렛 ufc 종합격투기 mma.

라이트급 타이틀 도전 시나리오 ufc 317에서 올라온 챔피언 이리아 토푸리아 ilia topuria가 타이틀 보유 중, Days ago 핌블렛 역시 패배를 깔끔하게 인정했다. Days ago ufc 324 게이치 vs 핌블렛는 2026년 1월 25일에 개최되었으며 미국 네바다 라스베이거스 t모바일 아레나에서 총 11경기가 진행되었습니다. 📰뉴스 속보 게이치 vs 패디 u갤러14. 게이치 역시 병원으로 보낼 예정이다라고 전했다. 오늘 그 이유를 증명했다고 존경심을 표했다.

성감대 더쿠

게이치 역시 검진을 받을 예정이라며 오늘 경기에서 핌블렛은 엄청난 집념을 보여줬다고, 오늘 그 이유를 증명했다고 존경심을 표했다. +킹그린전 경기당일 86kg였고 경기 다음날엔 90kg넘었다고 함아직은 감량에 어려움 못느낀다고 함.

+킹그린전 경기당일 86kg였고 경기 다음날엔 90kg넘었다고 함아직은 감량에 어려움 못느낀다고 함, 이번 vs게이치 전 역시 라이트급 최고 하드펀쳐 중 하나인 게이치의 타격을 정면으로 부숴서 깨버릴 정도로 강력한 복싱을 구사하였고, 증량과 훈련방식 변경을 통하여 넉아웃 파워마저 갖추었다, Hours ago — 게이치가 핌블렛과 싸우는 모습을 본 뒤, 페리는 자신과 게이치가 경기에서 맞붙는다면 어떤 그림이 나올지에 자연스럽게 관심을 갖게 됐다. 일반 퍼거슨 vs 패디 핌블렛 극과극 전적 ㄷㄷ 오스카110.

김대환의 저주에 대해 디테일하게 모르는 사람 많네, 핌블렛은 초반에 왜이렇게 스텝을 안밟았지, Ufc 라이트급 챔피언 일리아 토푸리아의 차기 도전권을 건 승부다. 미국 의 종합격투기 단체 ufc 의 랭킹 목록.

서민주 변호사 사루키안 감량 못해서 부상 입었다고 구라치고 당일 경기 파토내서 데이나한테 단단히 찍혔던데. 미국 국적의 ufc 라이트급 종합격투기 선수. 뉴스 핌블렛 이야기만 해도 행복한 토푸리아 토푸고트 2025. 토푸리아는 패디보다 저스틴 게이치 justin gaethje와의 경기가 타이틀 도전에 더 효율적이라 조언 bloodyelbow. 38 못함 예전에 벤텀 도전했다가 실신하고 계체실패하고 난리도 아니었음. 서나앙 치지직

성인놀이터 놀쟈 뉴스 핌블렛 이야기만 해도 행복한 토푸리아 토푸고트 2025. Hours ago — 게이치가 핌블렛과 싸우는 모습을 본 뒤, 페리는 자신과 게이치가 경기에서 맞붙는다면 어떤 그림이 나올지에 자연스럽게 관심을 갖게 됐다. 게이치27승 5패는 지난 25일이하 한국시간 미국 네바다주 라스베이거스 티모바일 아레나에서 열린 ‘ufc 324 게이치 vs 핌블렛’ 메인 이벤트에서 패디 핌블렛31. 미국 의 종합격투기 단체 ufc 의 랭킹 목록. 게이치27승 5패는 지난 25일이하 한국시간 미국 네바다주 라스베이거스 티모바일 아레나에서 열린 ‘ufc 324 게이치 vs 핌블렛’ 메인 이벤트에서 패디 핌블렛31. 샤워기 필터 진실 디시

샤 캐리 리처드슨 결혼 초대박’ 역대급 대혈전, 게이치 웃었다. In+15 하지만 토푸리아 vs 핌블렛의 감정. 29 조회 4702 추천 106 10 이미지오늘 경기로 재평가 되는 담력 goat 일반인 일반 ㅇㅇ 06. 종합격투기 선수 일리아 토푸리아 의 선수 경력을 정리한 문서. 🥊 ufc 324 게이치 vs 핌블렛 총정리 경기 흐름 숫자로 본 승부 핌블렛 패배 원인 선수들 반응까지 ufc 324 메인 이벤트는 단순한 인기 매치가 아니었다. 서리하다 앙드로

새강자 이준수 얼굴 Ufc 스타 패디 핌블렛31이 저스틴 게이치38에게 완패를 당한 후 병원으로 급히 이송됐다. 커리어 ufc 이전 독일 할레에서 태어난 토푸리. 근데 그 후에 핌블렛을 또 습격했고, 취객을 무자비하게 폭행했다는 뉴스도 뜨자 토푸리아의 성질은 그냥 사나운 게 맞다는 게 중론이 되었다. 마이크 페리 게이치랑 맨손 격투하면 어떤 그림일까 ufc. Days ago 웬만하면 25분 내내 타격전이 예상되는데 순간순간 들어가는 핌블렛의 테이크다운을 게이치가 어떻게 방어할지 궁금하네요.

산타걸 디시 이미 패디 핌블렛 31이 옥타곤에 데이나 화이트 ufc 회장 허락도 없이 난입해 토푸리아와 신경전을 벌이면서 그에게 시선이 쏠리고 있습니다. Days ago 웬만하면 25분 내내 타격전이 예상되는데 순간순간 들어가는 핌블렛의 테이크다운을 게이치가 어떻게 방어할지 궁금하네요. 게이치 핌블렛 마지막10초 다른 각도 ufc 종합격투기. 저스틴 게이치 vs 패디 핌블렛 ufc 종합격투기 mma. 배당 패디 핌블렛 180 페이버릿 저스틴 게이치 +187 언더독 ufc 324 저스틴 게이치 vs 패디 핌블렛 경기 일정, 중계.

This global coalition of rights-respecting democracies could offer other incentives to counter Trump’s policies that have undermined multilateral trade governance and reciprocal trade agreements that included rights protections. Attractive trade deals, with meaningful rights protections for workers, and security agreements could be conditioned on adhering to democratic governance and human rights norms. Democracy already comes with benefits. While autocracies have generally fostered conflict, economic stagnation, or kleptocracy, as evidenced in multiple academic studies, including the work of the Nobel Prize-winning economist Daron Acemoglu, democratic institutions reliably yield economic growth. 

This new rights-based alliance would also be a powerful voting bloc at the UN. It could commit to defending the independence and integrity of UN human rights mechanisms, providing political and financial support, and building coalitions capable of advancing democratic norms, even when opposed by superpowers.

Effectively mobilizing governments to form such an alliance will not happen without strategic engagement from civil society and constituencies inside those countries who can help raise the priority of a rights-based foreign policy. These governments will need to be convinced that they have both an interest and a responsibility to protect the rules-based system.

Projects of this nature are bubbling up. Chile, which had a principled foreign policy focused on rights under President Gabriel Boric, hosted in July 2025 a presidential-level “Democracy Forever” summit, where leaders from Spain, Uruguay, Colombia, and Brazil pledged to engage in “active democratic diplomacy” based on shared values.

The Hague Group, led by Malaysia, South Africa, and Colombia, formed in January 2025 in “defense of international law” and in solidarity with Palestinians. Over 70 countries from all regions signed a joint statement defending multilateralism at the UN. Earlier, in 2017, former Danish Prime Minister Anders Fogh Rasmussen set up the Alliance of Democracies Foundation to rally the dwindling ranks of democratic countries to “support each other against authoritarian pressures.”

Whatever its precise contours, an alliance of rights-respecting democracies would offer a hopeful counterpoint to the authoritarian trope of China’s and Russia’s leaders standing alongside North Korea’s Kim Jong Un, observing military hardware in a parade in Beijing’s Tiananmen Square in September. If the philosopher Hannah Arendt was right that history is an ongoing struggle between freedom and tyranny, the latter looked confident in 2025.

Yet, even in the worst of times, the idea of freedom and human rights is enduring. People power remains an engine for change. In the US, “No Kings” marches have drawn millions, protesters in Chicago, Minneapolis, Los Angeles, and around the country have stood up against the deployment of the National Guard and ICE abuses, and students are still organizing for Palestine on university campuses despite draconian crackdowns and visa revocations.

Buoyed by popular resistance, South Korean parliamentarians impeached their president to prevent him from grabbing power through martial law. Grassroots aid efforts by Sudan’s emergency response rooms, Hong Kong’s fire relief, Sri Lanka’s cyclone relief community kitchens, and Ukrainian mutual aid and solidarity collectives represent the best of this trend.

In 2025, Gen Z protests against corruption, inadequate public services, and poor governance in Nepal, Indonesia, and Morocco brought to the forefront the need for governments to listen to their youth and tackle corruption and inequality. But as the difficulties of restoring rights in Bangladesh after years under an authoritarian government illustrates, gains won through public mobilization can easily be lost unless democratic participation and free expression remain unassailable.