Will Human Rights Survive a Trumpian World?

Authoritarian Advances Threaten Rules-Based Order

The global human rights system is in peril. Under relentless pressure from US President Donald Trump, and persistently undermined by China and Russia, the rules-based international order is being crushed, threatening to take with it the architecture human rights defenders have come to rely on to advance norms and protect freedoms. To defy this trend, governments that still value human rights, alongside social movements, civil society, and international institutions, need to form a strategic alliance to push back.

To be fair, the downward spiral predated Trump’s reelection. The democratic wave that began over 50 years ago has given way to what scholars term a “democratic recession.” Democracy is now back to 1985 levels according to some metrics, with 72 percent of the world’s population now living under autocracy. Russia and China are less free today than 20 years ago. And so is the United States.

Of course, democracy is not a panacea for human rights violations; the US and other longtime democracies have their own histories of colonial crimes, racism, abusive justice systems, and wartime atrocities. More recently, authoritarian leaders have exploited public mistrust and anger to win elections and then dismantled the very institutions that brought them to power. Democratic institutions are crucial to represent the will of the people and keep power in check. It’s no surprise that whenever democracy is undermined, rights are too, as evident in recent years in India, Türkiye, the Philippines, El Salvador, and Hungary.

In this context, 2025 may be seen as a tipping point. In just 12 months, the Trump administration has carried out a broad assault on key pillars of US democracy and the global rules-based order, which the US, despite inconsistencies, was, with other states, instrumental in helping to establish.

In short order, Trump’s second-term administration has undermined trust in the sanctity of elections, reduced government accountability, gutted food assistance and healthcare subsidies, attacked judicial independence, defied court orders, rolled back women’s rights, obstructed access to abortion care, undermined remedies for racial harm, terminated programs mandating accessibility for people with disabilities, punished free speech, stripped protections from trans and intersex people, eroded privacy, and used government power to intimidate political opponents, the media, law firms, universities, civil society, and even comedians.

Claiming a risk of “civilizational erasure” in Europe and leaning on racist tropes to cast entire populations as unwelcome in the US, the Trump administration has embraced policies and rhetoric that align with white nationalist ideology. Immigrants and asylum seekers have been subjected to inhumane conditions and degrading treatment; 32 died in US Immigration and Customs Enforcement custody in 2025, and as of mid-January 2026, an additional 4 have died. Masked immigration enforcement agents have targeted people of color, using excessive force, terrorizing communities, wrongfully arresting scores of citizens, and, most recently, unjustifiably killing two people in Minneapolis, whose deaths Human Rights Watch has documented.

The US president of course has the authority to tighten US borders and enforce stricter immigration policies. The administration is not, however, entitled to deny legal process to asylum seekers, mistreat undocumented migrants, or unlawfully discriminate. In a well-functioning democracy, no electoral mandate should supersede domestic legislation, constitutional protections, or international human rights law. Trump’s team has repeatedly bypassed these guardrails.

The violations have not stopped at the border. The Trump administration used a 1798 law to send hundreds of Venezuelan migrants to an infamous prison in El Salvador, where they were tortured and sexually abused. Its blatantly unlawful strikes on boats in the Caribbean and the Pacific extrajudicially killed more than 120 people whom Trump claims were drug traffickers.

After the US attacked Venezuela and apprehended its president, Nicolás Maduro, and his wife, Cilia Flores, Trump claimed the US would “run” the country and control its vast oil reserves. Despite paying lip service to human rights concerns under Maduro at the United Nations, Trump has worked with the same repressive apparatus to further US interests. Many Western allies have chosen to stay silent about these lawless moves, perhaps fearing erratic tariffs and blowback to their alliances.

Trump’s foreign policy has upended the foundations of the rules-based order that seeks to advance democracy and human rights, even if imperfectly.

Trump has boasted that he doesn’t “need international law” as a constraint, only his “own morality.” His administration has politicized the US State Department’s annual human rights report, stepped away from the global prohibition on antipersonnel landmines, voiced support for rewriting international rules on asylum, and skipped the UN’s Universal Periodic Review of the US’ human rights record.

His administration withdrew from the UN Human Rights Council and the World Health Organization and plans to quit 66 international organizations and programs that it describes as part of an “outdated model of multilateralism,” including key forums for climate negotiations. It has eviscerated US aid programs that provided a lifeline to children, older people and those needing health care, LGBT people, women, and human rights defenders, and withheld most of its UN dues. 

Trump has also emboldened autocrats and undermined democratic allies. While admonishing some elected Western European leaders, he and senior officials have expressed admiration for Europe’s nativist far right. He has favored autocrats such as Hungary’s Prime Minister Viktor Orban, Türkiye’s President Recep Tayyip Erdoğan, and El Salvador’s President Nayib Bukele, while continuing decades of US support to Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman and Egypt’s President Abdel Fattah al-Sisi.

His administration has unjustifiably imposed sanctions to punish respected Palestinian human rights organizations, the International Criminal Court’s (ICC) prosecutor and many of its judges, a UN special rapporteur, and for several months, a Brazilian Supreme Court judge and his wife.

The institutional response in the US to Trump’s power grabs has been shockingly muted. Much of Congress, controlled by his own party, has not challenged his supercharged expansion of executive power. The leaders of the US’ most powerful technology companies have made significant donations and sought to placate the president. Some big law firms and prestigious universities have made deals rather than assert their independence, and some media organizations seem afraid to attract the president’s ire.

Has the US switched sides on the human rights playing field? While US engagement with human rights institutions has always been selective, China and Russia have long pursued an illiberal agenda. They stand much to gain from a US government that now expresses open hostility to universal rights. China and Russia remain strategic rivals of the US, but all three countries are now led by leaders who share open disdain for norms and institutions that could constrain their power.

Together, they wield considerable economic, military, and diplomatic power. If they were to consistently act as allies of convenience to erode global rules, they could threaten the entire system. Already, a loose international network of countries such as North Korea, Iran, Venezuela, Myanmar, Cuba, and Belarus work in concert with Russia and China. These leaders share very little ideologically but align in undermining human rights and promoting a regressive international agenda. In word and in practice, the US government is now helping them in this endeavor.

The US’ weakening of multilateral institutions also dealt a serious blow to global efforts to prevent or stop grave international crimes. The “never again” movement, born from the horrors of the Holocaust and reignited by the Rwandan and Bosnian genocides, spurred the UN General Assembly to embrace the Responsibility to Protect (R2P) in 2005. Meant to guide international intervention to prevent and stop atrocities in tandem with efforts to prosecute and punish serious crimes, R2P made a real difference in places like the Central African Republic and Kenya.

Today, R2P is rarely invoked and the ICC is under siege. In addition to Trump’s far-reaching sanctions, in December 2025 a Moscow court sentenced the ICC prosecutor and eight of its judges to prison terms in absentia. Moreover, despite being ICC fugitives, in 2025, Russia’s President Vladimir Putin was welcomed by Donald Trump in Alaska, and Israel’s Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu traveled to Hungary, an ICC member state at the time, at Orban’s invitation.

Twenty years ago, the US government and civil society were instrumental in galvanizing a response to mass atrocities in Darfur. Sudan is burning again, but this time under Trump, with relative impunity. Sudan’s Rapid Support Forces (RSF), which emerged from the militias that led the prior ethnic cleansing campaign, are again committing murder and rape on a mass scale. A growing body of evidence indicates that the UAE, a longtime US ally that recently made multi-billion-dollar deals with Trump, is providing the RSF with military support.

In the Occupied Palestinian Territory, the Israeli armed forces have committed acts of genocide, ethnic cleansing, and crimes against humanity, killing over 70,000 people since the October 2023 Hamas-led attacks on Israel and displacing the vast majority of Gaza’s population. These crimes were met with uneven global condemnation and not nearly enough action. Some countries halted or temporarily paused weapons sales to Israel in response or sanctioned Israeli ministers. Trump, however, continued a long-standing US policy of almost unconditional support to Israel, even as the International Court of Justice is weighing allegations of genocide and has issued binding orders under the Genocide Convention to protect Palestinians’ rights.

Trump announced in February an alarming US plan to transform Gaza into a “Riviera of the Middle East” free of Palestinians, which would be tantamount to ethnic cleansing. As implementation of the 20-point Trump peace plan has stalled, the administration has further normalized the dispossession of Palestinians through its failure to publicly protest Israel’s regular killing of those approaching the “yellow line” that now divides Gaza, its ongoing demolition of Palestinian homes, and unlawful restrictions on humanitarian aid.

In Ukraine, Trump’s peace efforts have consistently downplayed Russia’s responsibility for serious violations. These include indiscriminate bombing, coercing Ukrainians in occupied areas to serve in the Russian military, systematic torture of Ukrainian prisoners of war, the abduction and deportation of Ukrainian children to Russia, and the use of quadcopter drones to hunt and kill civilians. Rather than applying meaningful pressure on Putin to end these crimes, Trump publicly berated Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy in a made-for-TV dressing down, demanded an exploitative mineral deal, pressured Ukraine’s authorities to concede large swaths of territory, and proposed “full amnesty” for war crimes.

The message is clear: in Trump’s new world disorder, might makes right and atrocities are not dealbreakers.

‘짤쓸사람’라는 네임의 뜻이 무엇인가요. 기계나 첨단기기와는 애초에 잘 맞지않는 기계치였는데, 외로움을 달래는 소통의 수단으로 2003년 블로그를 만들어 운영하면서부터. 그리고 외형도 말티즈와 가장 유사하죠. 원래는 현재 유명한 가나디, 고냐니, 공룡이가 아닌 다른 캐릭터들을.

Ipx811 4k

Com › mamoru526 › 223907798184듀듀듀 가나디 짤 모음zip. 개강했다고 하는걸 보아 대학생, 어림 3. 방금 새벽에도 역시 올라온 명작들 보기만해도 개같이.

Jannybbxoxo

업데이트 작가 프로필 수정 요청 바바라 디 저 미국의 소설가. 진짜 현대미술임ㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋ 가나디 예술 현대, 무얼 올릴지는 앞으로 지켜봐주면 감사하겠다.

물론 믹스견일 가능성도 있지만 우리나라에서 가장 많이 키우는 견종 중 하나인 말티즈가 일반적으로 사람들에게 친숙하기 때문에 작가분도 말티즈를 모티브로 듀가나디를 그리지 않으셨을까 추정합니다, Webtoon on j 대학생반 대치애니포스 애니포스웹툰학원 디지털드로잉 애니포스 웹툰학원 대치본원에서 7월부터 대학생을 위한 디지털드로잉 전문 웹툰일러스트반이 개설됩니다😊 입시학원을 졸업했지만 실력을 더 키우고. 그런 한편 상실감, 소외감에도 시달립니다.

원래는 현재 유명한 가나디, 고냐니, 공룡이가 아닌.. 방금 새벽에도 역시 올라온 명작들 보기만해도 개같이 지침..

가나디 작가님 학교 졸업 안했으면 좋겟음27. 수많은 짤을 만들어낸 바로 그 작가, 짤쓸사람을 소개합니다, 하티스트 가나아트에서 미술전공 대학생 대학원생을 대상으로 전시 공모를 지원합니다. 가나디 듀가나디 개강 대학생 대학원생 그림 예술 예술작품 그림 작가가 강의팔이 하는 이유, 수많은 짤을 만들어낸 바로 그 작가, 짤쓸사람을 소개합니다, 듀 가나디, 안경만두 매력 만땅 인디캐릭터, 캐릭터 시장.

Com › mongle137 › 223692897218성수 팝업스토어 ‘짤쓸사람&성수마플샵’ 가나디, 본인을 잘 안드러내서 뭔가 망신살 없음, 개인 신상이 널리 안퍼짐 4, 가나디 예술 현대미술 작품 개강 대학생 대학교 예술가 개 그림작가의 아이디어 살짝 고갈되면 돌아오는 단편선입니다 근데 진짜.

Ichigo Aika Strawberry Elegy Manga Español

작가 짤쓸사람에 의하면 가장 현실적인 캐릭터라고 한다. 가나아트는 모리셔스 섬의 멸종된 도도새를 주제로 현대인의 자유와 무한한 가능성을 이야기하는 작가 김선우 b, 그런 한편 상실감, 소외감에도 시달립니다. 아래 구글폼만 작성하면 한 번씩 확인할 때 마다 초대해드려요.

Javrank 애널

Hnf, 세상을 장난스럽게 물들이다 캐릭터 브랜드, 작년부터 1020대 여성층 사이에서 큰 인기를 끌었던 캐릭터가 있다. 바로 듀 가나디강아지를 귀엽게 발음이다, 뻔한 일상글보다는 뭔가 기획해서 꾸준히 작성할 수 있는 시리즈를 만들어보려고 한다. 브런치 작가되기 잘 살아보기 앞으로 매주 3개씩 글 올리도록 하겠다, Webtoon on j 대학생반 대치애니포스 애니포스웹툰학원 디지털드로잉 애니포스 웹툰학원 대치본원에서 7월부터 대학생을 위한 디지털드로잉 전문 웹툰일러스트반이 개설됩니다😊 입시학원을 졸업했지만 실력을 더 키우고.

이후 공개 계정의 이름을 짓기 어려워서 해당 멘트를 그대로 차용했습니다. ‘짤쓸사람’라는 네임의 뜻이 무엇인가요, 업데이트 작가 프로필 수정 요청 바바라 디 저 미국의 소설가. 17k likes, 24 comments the_edit. 듀 가나디는 카카오 이모티콘샵에서 제공하는 이모티콘으로, 메시지에 개성을 더하고 재미를 선사합니다.

Is Seaart Nsfw

본인을 잘 안드러내서 뭔가 망신살 없음, 개인 신상이 널리 안퍼짐 4, 수정 사항은 아래에서 확인하실 수 있습니다 테마 제작을 흔쾌히 허락해 주신 작가님 너무 감사함니다. 58k followers, 145 following, 335 posts gana art 가나아트 @ganaart__official on instagram contemporary art gallery in seoul, korea. 가나디 듀가나디 개강 대학생 대학원생 그림 예술 예술작품 그림 작가가 강의팔이 하는 이유. 90k followers, 51 following, 162 posts 요다 병아리 @yoda_ari on instagram 네이버 完 네이버 연재중🔥 💌ari9402@naver. 특유의 단순하지만 귀여운 캐릭터들과 투박한 그림체가 특징이다.

javrank 왁싱 Likes, 0 comments aniforce. ✏️ 삐뚤빼뚤한 선이 우리를 위로할 때 요즘 귀여움의 아이콘. 가나디 작가님 학교 졸업 안했으면 좋겟음. 선물하기 구매하기 월 3,900원플러스 시작하기. 모든 이야기의 시작, daum 카페 작성자저탄고지가보자고작성시간25. irene pikpak

javrank 신입 Com › news › newsviewhnf, 세상을 장난스럽게 물들이다 캐릭터 브랜드. 인스티즈 로고 대학생이라서 시험기간마다 레전드됨 ㅠㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋ 3개월 전. 브런치 작가되기 잘 살아보기 앞으로 매주 3개씩 글 올리도록 하겠다. 아래 구글폼만 작성하면 한 번씩 확인할 때 마다 초대해드려요. 12월 30일 수정 다크모드 버전 추가했습니다. jigzjigzz

jav spanking 58k followers, 145 following, 335 posts gana art 가나아트 @ganaart__official on instagram contemporary art gallery in seoul, korea. 요즘 귀여움의 아이콘으로 불리는 가나디. 작년부터 1020대 여성층 사이에서 큰 인기를 끌었던 캐릭터가 있다. 브런치 작가되기 잘 살아보기 앞으로 매주 3개씩 글 올리도록 하겠다. A입니다 오늘은 제38회 dca 대학생 광고대상 기획서 부문 수상작 롯데제과 가나 분석을 해보겠습니다. inran youkai exorcism ~akaname wa fellatio chuudoku~

isshiki momoko ✏️ 삐뚤빼뚤한 선이 우리를 위로할 때 요즘 귀여움의 아이콘. 물론 믹스견일 가능성도 있지만 우리나라에서 가장 많이 키우는 견종 중 하나인 말티즈가 일반적으로 사람들에게 친숙하기 때문에 작가분도 말티즈를 모티브로 듀가나디를 그리지 않으셨을까 추정합니다. 방금 새벽에도 역시 올라온 명작들 보기만해도 개같이. 요즘 일요일 밤마다 명작 쏟아내는 중이라는 듀가나디. 날것 감성 그대로라는 듀가나디 작가님 근황 뱀선생 티스토리.

ipcam 노래방 야동 업데이트 작가 프로필 수정 요청 바바라 디 저 미국의 소설가. 가나디짤 가나디 가나디뜻 짤모음 블로그짤모음 블로그짤 웃긴짤모음 가나디짤모음 듀듀듀가나디 듀가나디짤 듀가나디짤모음 짤모음집 인스타짤 짤추천 프사짤추천 가나디바나나우유 가나디포토이즘 가나디고냐니 가나디고냐니카톡테마 가나. 업데이트 작가 프로필 수정 요청 바바라 디 저 미국의 소설가. 나무위키는 백과사전이 아니며 검증되지 않았거나, 편향적이거나, 잘못된 서술이 있을 수. 진짜 현대미술임ㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋ 가나디 예술 현대.

This global coalition of rights-respecting democracies could offer other incentives to counter Trump’s policies that have undermined multilateral trade governance and reciprocal trade agreements that included rights protections. Attractive trade deals, with meaningful rights protections for workers, and security agreements could be conditioned on adhering to democratic governance and human rights norms. Democracy already comes with benefits. While autocracies have generally fostered conflict, economic stagnation, or kleptocracy, as evidenced in multiple academic studies, including the work of the Nobel Prize-winning economist Daron Acemoglu, democratic institutions reliably yield economic growth. 

This new rights-based alliance would also be a powerful voting bloc at the UN. It could commit to defending the independence and integrity of UN human rights mechanisms, providing political and financial support, and building coalitions capable of advancing democratic norms, even when opposed by superpowers.

Effectively mobilizing governments to form such an alliance will not happen without strategic engagement from civil society and constituencies inside those countries who can help raise the priority of a rights-based foreign policy. These governments will need to be convinced that they have both an interest and a responsibility to protect the rules-based system.

Projects of this nature are bubbling up. Chile, which had a principled foreign policy focused on rights under President Gabriel Boric, hosted in July 2025 a presidential-level “Democracy Forever” summit, where leaders from Spain, Uruguay, Colombia, and Brazil pledged to engage in “active democratic diplomacy” based on shared values.

The Hague Group, led by Malaysia, South Africa, and Colombia, formed in January 2025 in “defense of international law” and in solidarity with Palestinians. Over 70 countries from all regions signed a joint statement defending multilateralism at the UN. Earlier, in 2017, former Danish Prime Minister Anders Fogh Rasmussen set up the Alliance of Democracies Foundation to rally the dwindling ranks of democratic countries to “support each other against authoritarian pressures.”

Whatever its precise contours, an alliance of rights-respecting democracies would offer a hopeful counterpoint to the authoritarian trope of China’s and Russia’s leaders standing alongside North Korea’s Kim Jong Un, observing military hardware in a parade in Beijing’s Tiananmen Square in September. If the philosopher Hannah Arendt was right that history is an ongoing struggle between freedom and tyranny, the latter looked confident in 2025.

Yet, even in the worst of times, the idea of freedom and human rights is enduring. People power remains an engine for change. In the US, “No Kings” marches have drawn millions, protesters in Chicago, Minneapolis, Los Angeles, and around the country have stood up against the deployment of the National Guard and ICE abuses, and students are still organizing for Palestine on university campuses despite draconian crackdowns and visa revocations.

Buoyed by popular resistance, South Korean parliamentarians impeached their president to prevent him from grabbing power through martial law. Grassroots aid efforts by Sudan’s emergency response rooms, Hong Kong’s fire relief, Sri Lanka’s cyclone relief community kitchens, and Ukrainian mutual aid and solidarity collectives represent the best of this trend.

In 2025, Gen Z protests against corruption, inadequate public services, and poor governance in Nepal, Indonesia, and Morocco brought to the forefront the need for governments to listen to their youth and tackle corruption and inequality. But as the difficulties of restoring rights in Bangladesh after years under an authoritarian government illustrates, gains won through public mobilization can easily be lost unless democratic participation and free expression remain unassailable.