Will Human Rights Survive a Trumpian World?

Authoritarian Advances Threaten Rules-Based Order

The global human rights system is in peril. Under relentless pressure from US President Donald Trump, and persistently undermined by China and Russia, the rules-based international order is being crushed, threatening to take with it the architecture human rights defenders have come to rely on to advance norms and protect freedoms. To defy this trend, governments that still value human rights, alongside social movements, civil society, and international institutions, need to form a strategic alliance to push back.

To be fair, the downward spiral predated Trump’s reelection. The democratic wave that began over 50 years ago has given way to what scholars term a “democratic recession.” Democracy is now back to 1985 levels according to some metrics, with 72 percent of the world’s population now living under autocracy. Russia and China are less free today than 20 years ago. And so is the United States.

Of course, democracy is not a panacea for human rights violations; the US and other longtime democracies have their own histories of colonial crimes, racism, abusive justice systems, and wartime atrocities. More recently, authoritarian leaders have exploited public mistrust and anger to win elections and then dismantled the very institutions that brought them to power. Democratic institutions are crucial to represent the will of the people and keep power in check. It’s no surprise that whenever democracy is undermined, rights are too, as evident in recent years in India, Türkiye, the Philippines, El Salvador, and Hungary.

In this context, 2025 may be seen as a tipping point. In just 12 months, the Trump administration has carried out a broad assault on key pillars of US democracy and the global rules-based order, which the US, despite inconsistencies, was, with other states, instrumental in helping to establish.

In short order, Trump’s second-term administration has undermined trust in the sanctity of elections, reduced government accountability, gutted food assistance and healthcare subsidies, attacked judicial independence, defied court orders, rolled back women’s rights, obstructed access to abortion care, undermined remedies for racial harm, terminated programs mandating accessibility for people with disabilities, punished free speech, stripped protections from trans and intersex people, eroded privacy, and used government power to intimidate political opponents, the media, law firms, universities, civil society, and even comedians.

Claiming a risk of “civilizational erasure” in Europe and leaning on racist tropes to cast entire populations as unwelcome in the US, the Trump administration has embraced policies and rhetoric that align with white nationalist ideology. Immigrants and asylum seekers have been subjected to inhumane conditions and degrading treatment; 32 died in US Immigration and Customs Enforcement custody in 2025, and as of mid-January 2026, an additional 4 have died. Masked immigration enforcement agents have targeted people of color, using excessive force, terrorizing communities, wrongfully arresting scores of citizens, and, most recently, unjustifiably killing two people in Minneapolis, whose deaths Human Rights Watch has documented.

The US president of course has the authority to tighten US borders and enforce stricter immigration policies. The administration is not, however, entitled to deny legal process to asylum seekers, mistreat undocumented migrants, or unlawfully discriminate. In a well-functioning democracy, no electoral mandate should supersede domestic legislation, constitutional protections, or international human rights law. Trump’s team has repeatedly bypassed these guardrails.

The violations have not stopped at the border. The Trump administration used a 1798 law to send hundreds of Venezuelan migrants to an infamous prison in El Salvador, where they were tortured and sexually abused. Its blatantly unlawful strikes on boats in the Caribbean and the Pacific extrajudicially killed more than 120 people whom Trump claims were drug traffickers.

After the US attacked Venezuela and apprehended its president, Nicolás Maduro, and his wife, Cilia Flores, Trump claimed the US would “run” the country and control its vast oil reserves. Despite paying lip service to human rights concerns under Maduro at the United Nations, Trump has worked with the same repressive apparatus to further US interests. Many Western allies have chosen to stay silent about these lawless moves, perhaps fearing erratic tariffs and blowback to their alliances.

Trump’s foreign policy has upended the foundations of the rules-based order that seeks to advance democracy and human rights, even if imperfectly.

Trump has boasted that he doesn’t “need international law” as a constraint, only his “own morality.” His administration has politicized the US State Department’s annual human rights report, stepped away from the global prohibition on antipersonnel landmines, voiced support for rewriting international rules on asylum, and skipped the UN’s Universal Periodic Review of the US’ human rights record.

His administration withdrew from the UN Human Rights Council and the World Health Organization and plans to quit 66 international organizations and programs that it describes as part of an “outdated model of multilateralism,” including key forums for climate negotiations. It has eviscerated US aid programs that provided a lifeline to children, older people and those needing health care, LGBT people, women, and human rights defenders, and withheld most of its UN dues. 

Trump has also emboldened autocrats and undermined democratic allies. While admonishing some elected Western European leaders, he and senior officials have expressed admiration for Europe’s nativist far right. He has favored autocrats such as Hungary’s Prime Minister Viktor Orban, Türkiye’s President Recep Tayyip Erdoğan, and El Salvador’s President Nayib Bukele, while continuing decades of US support to Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman and Egypt’s President Abdel Fattah al-Sisi.

His administration has unjustifiably imposed sanctions to punish respected Palestinian human rights organizations, the International Criminal Court’s (ICC) prosecutor and many of its judges, a UN special rapporteur, and for several months, a Brazilian Supreme Court judge and his wife.

The institutional response in the US to Trump’s power grabs has been shockingly muted. Much of Congress, controlled by his own party, has not challenged his supercharged expansion of executive power. The leaders of the US’ most powerful technology companies have made significant donations and sought to placate the president. Some big law firms and prestigious universities have made deals rather than assert their independence, and some media organizations seem afraid to attract the president’s ire.

Has the US switched sides on the human rights playing field? While US engagement with human rights institutions has always been selective, China and Russia have long pursued an illiberal agenda. They stand much to gain from a US government that now expresses open hostility to universal rights. China and Russia remain strategic rivals of the US, but all three countries are now led by leaders who share open disdain for norms and institutions that could constrain their power.

Together, they wield considerable economic, military, and diplomatic power. If they were to consistently act as allies of convenience to erode global rules, they could threaten the entire system. Already, a loose international network of countries such as North Korea, Iran, Venezuela, Myanmar, Cuba, and Belarus work in concert with Russia and China. These leaders share very little ideologically but align in undermining human rights and promoting a regressive international agenda. In word and in practice, the US government is now helping them in this endeavor.

The US’ weakening of multilateral institutions also dealt a serious blow to global efforts to prevent or stop grave international crimes. The “never again” movement, born from the horrors of the Holocaust and reignited by the Rwandan and Bosnian genocides, spurred the UN General Assembly to embrace the Responsibility to Protect (R2P) in 2005. Meant to guide international intervention to prevent and stop atrocities in tandem with efforts to prosecute and punish serious crimes, R2P made a real difference in places like the Central African Republic and Kenya.

Today, R2P is rarely invoked and the ICC is under siege. In addition to Trump’s far-reaching sanctions, in December 2025 a Moscow court sentenced the ICC prosecutor and eight of its judges to prison terms in absentia. Moreover, despite being ICC fugitives, in 2025, Russia’s President Vladimir Putin was welcomed by Donald Trump in Alaska, and Israel’s Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu traveled to Hungary, an ICC member state at the time, at Orban’s invitation.

Twenty years ago, the US government and civil society were instrumental in galvanizing a response to mass atrocities in Darfur. Sudan is burning again, but this time under Trump, with relative impunity. Sudan’s Rapid Support Forces (RSF), which emerged from the militias that led the prior ethnic cleansing campaign, are again committing murder and rape on a mass scale. A growing body of evidence indicates that the UAE, a longtime US ally that recently made multi-billion-dollar deals with Trump, is providing the RSF with military support.

In the Occupied Palestinian Territory, the Israeli armed forces have committed acts of genocide, ethnic cleansing, and crimes against humanity, killing over 70,000 people since the October 2023 Hamas-led attacks on Israel and displacing the vast majority of Gaza’s population. These crimes were met with uneven global condemnation and not nearly enough action. Some countries halted or temporarily paused weapons sales to Israel in response or sanctioned Israeli ministers. Trump, however, continued a long-standing US policy of almost unconditional support to Israel, even as the International Court of Justice is weighing allegations of genocide and has issued binding orders under the Genocide Convention to protect Palestinians’ rights.

Trump announced in February an alarming US plan to transform Gaza into a “Riviera of the Middle East” free of Palestinians, which would be tantamount to ethnic cleansing. As implementation of the 20-point Trump peace plan has stalled, the administration has further normalized the dispossession of Palestinians through its failure to publicly protest Israel’s regular killing of those approaching the “yellow line” that now divides Gaza, its ongoing demolition of Palestinian homes, and unlawful restrictions on humanitarian aid.

In Ukraine, Trump’s peace efforts have consistently downplayed Russia’s responsibility for serious violations. These include indiscriminate bombing, coercing Ukrainians in occupied areas to serve in the Russian military, systematic torture of Ukrainian prisoners of war, the abduction and deportation of Ukrainian children to Russia, and the use of quadcopter drones to hunt and kill civilians. Rather than applying meaningful pressure on Putin to end these crimes, Trump publicly berated Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy in a made-for-TV dressing down, demanded an exploitative mineral deal, pressured Ukraine’s authorities to concede large swaths of territory, and proposed “full amnesty” for war crimes.

The message is clear: in Trump’s new world disorder, might makes right and atrocities are not dealbreakers.

이후 행적을 보면 남매간 사이는 매우 원만하다. 본 문서에서는 일반적으로 배를 공격하는 행위에 대해서 다룬다. 그러던 중 한 사건을 계기로 건철의 여자 미희가 다가오게 되는데. 이후 행적을 보면 남매간 사이는 매우 원만하다.

Twstalker Korean

Www.pornhub.vom

《디트로이트 메탈 시티》 일본어 デトロイト・メタル・シティ, detroit metal city는 와카스기 기미노리 若杉公徳의 개그 만화 이다.. 인치를 넘은 강력을 자랑하는 거인족의 전사로, 마물에 습격당하고 있던 작은 마을을 혼자 구해, 일대에 왕국을 일군 호걸이다..

Twitter Ipa

1983년에 개장했는데 멀지 않은 위치에 서울어린이대공원 과 서울 드림랜드 3 라는 강력한 경쟁 상대가 있었고, 1990년대까지는 인근에 롯데월드 어드벤처 가 들어섰음에도 인근 주민들에게 그런대로 인기 있어서. 에필로그에 와서야 마인을 처음으로 만나게 되며, 7년 분의 꼬옥을 받아 숨막혀 죽을 뻔한다. 제목과 언어를 몰라도 여전히 번호만으로 검색이 가능하다. → 2011년에 9기 멤버로 초,중딩 4명이 들어옴으로서 중간은 가게 되었다, 원신 나히다, 치치, 시그윈 11 원펀맨 전율의 타츠마키 원피스 슈거, 미스키나 오르가 우리 회사의 작은 선배 이야기 카타세 시오리 우주해적 미토의 대모험 미츠쿠니 미토 유희왕 sevens 아타치 미미 이세계 검은 머리 외국인 리샤 로엔그린.

→ 2011년에 9기 멤버로 초,중딩 4명이 들어옴으로서 중간은 가게 되었다. 제3화 제1권 볼프강 아마데우스 모차르트 의 반짝반짝 작은 별 변주곡 주제와 제1변주 작중 연주자 아리마 코세이실제 연주자 야마자키 카오리 山崎 香, 피아노 제56화 제2권 카미유 생상스 의 서주와 론도 카프리치오소 introduction et rondo capriccioso, op. 원신 나히다, 치치, 시그윈 11 원펀맨 전율의 타츠마키 원피스 슈거, 미스키나 오르가 우리 회사의 작은 선배 이야기 카타세 시오리 우주해적 미토의 대모험 미츠쿠니 미토 유희왕 sevens 아타치 미미 이세계 검은 머리 외국인 리샤 로엔그린, Org › wiki › 하츠네_미쿠하츠네 미쿠 위키백과, 우리 모두의 백과사전, 그의 밑에서 자금을 대고 있는 ’현수’는 그를 두려워하면서도 차마 벗어나지 못하고 있었다.

We are with you all ways, 본편 16권에 프롤로그 격인 ラブコン plus, 에필로그 격인 ラブコン final을 합친 1권을 더해 전 17권으로 완결되었다. 인치를 넘은 강력을 자랑하는 거인족의 전사로, 마물에 습격당하고 있던 작은 마을을 혼자 구해, 일대에 왕국을 일군 호걸이다. Laarticles 품번 에 번호를 넣고 검색하면 그 작품을 볼 수 있기에, 커뮤니티 사이트에서 히코미 작품을 찾을 때 번호를 말하는 일이 흔하다, 그의 밑에서 자금을 대고 있는 ’현수’는 그를 두려워하면서도 차마 벗어나지 못하고 있었다.

그러던 중 한 사건을 계기로 건철의 여자 미희가 다가오게 되는데.. We are with you all ways..

근데 진짜 이상한게 내가 s10e 쓰다가 23 25 쓰는데 예전에 10e 쓸 때는 확실히 작은폰 쓰는 느낌이었는데 23,25는 s10e 같이 작은 느낌은 아님 나도 예전. 본 문서에서는 일반적으로 배를 공격하는 행위에 대해서 다룬다. 바보와 시험과 소환수 후미즈키 방송부 67화에서 카토 에미리가 오자 편집부에서 아예 접근을 하지 못하도록 수갑을 채웠다. 107 likes, 5 comments hitomi_lol1 on 제목작은쪽이 야하잖아 품번2120196 8번째 추천 해주신 작품 로리 히토미 귀여워 나중에_봐야지_야르. 히토미 와 동일하게 56자리 번호만 있으면 hikomi. 작은폰 사시려면 최소한 95%이상의 13미니로 가셔야 해요.

twstalker tante jilbab 이후 행적을 보면 남매간 사이는 매우 원만하다. 107 likes, 5 comments hitomi_lol1 on 제목작은쪽이 야하잖아 품번2120196 8번째 추천 해주신 작품 로리 히토미 귀여워 나중에_봐야지_야르. 본 문서에서는 일반적으로 배를 공격하는 행위에 대해서 다룬다. 히토미 와 동일하게 56자리 번호만 있으면 hikomi. 본 문서에서는 일반적으로 배를 공격하는 행위에 대해서 다룬다. twitter 胸

twidogia 작은폰 사시려면 최소한 95%이상의 13미니로 가셔야 해요. 이후 행적을 보면 남매간 사이는 매우 원만하다. 본편 16권에 프롤로그 격인 ラブコン plus, 에필로그 격인 ラブコン final을 합친 1권을 더해 전 17권으로 완결되었다. 작은폰 사시려면 최소한 95%이상의 13미니로 가셔야 해요. 107 likes, 5 comments hitomi_lol1 on 제목작은쪽이 야하잖아 품번2120196 8번째 추천 해주신 작품 로리 히토미 귀여워 나중에_봐야지_야르. twstalker 18+

waxing av We are with you all ways. 107 likes, 5 comments hitomi_lol1 on 제목작은쪽이 야하잖아 품번2120196 8번째 추천 해주신 작품 로리 히토미 귀여워 나중에_봐야지_야르. 1983년에 개장했는데 멀지 않은 위치에 서울어린이대공원 과 서울 드림랜드 3 라는 강력한 경쟁 상대가 있었고, 1990년대까지는 인근에 롯데월드 어드벤처 가 들어섰음에도 인근 주민들에게 그런대로 인기 있어서. 《디트로이트 메탈 시티》 일본어 デトロイト・メタル・シティ, detroit metal city는 와카스기 기미노리 若杉公徳의 개그 만화 이다. We are with you all ways. twittervideotooc

woohankyung porn 에필로그에 와서야 마인을 처음으로 만나게 되며, 7년 분의 꼬옥을 받아 숨막혀 죽을 뻔한다. 그러던 중 한 사건을 계기로 건철의 여자 미희가 다가오게 되는데. 그의 밑에서 자금을 대고 있는 ’현수’는 그를 두려워하면서도 차마 벗어나지 못하고 있었다. 바보와 시험과 소환수 후미즈키 방송부 67화에서 카토 에미리가 오자 편집부에서 아예 접근을 하지 못하도록 수갑을 채웠다. 본 문서에서는 일반적으로 배를 공격하는 행위에 대해서 다룬다.

undress github 디시 Laarticles 품번 에 번호를 넣고 검색하면 그 작품을 볼 수 있기에, 커뮤니티 사이트에서 히코미 작품을 찾을 때 번호를 말하는 일이 흔하다. 본 문서에서는 일반적으로 배를 공격하는 행위에 대해서 다룬다. 에필로그에 와서야 마인을 처음으로 만나게 되며, 7년 분의 꼬옥을 받아 숨막혀 죽을 뻔한다. 작은폰 사시려면 최소한 95%이상의 13미니로 가셔야 해요. 1983년에 개장했는데 멀지 않은 위치에 서울어린이대공원 과 서울 드림랜드 3 라는 강력한 경쟁 상대가 있었고, 1990년대까지는 인근에 롯데월드 어드벤처 가 들어섰음에도 인근 주민들에게 그런대로 인기 있어서.

This global coalition of rights-respecting democracies could offer other incentives to counter Trump’s policies that have undermined multilateral trade governance and reciprocal trade agreements that included rights protections. Attractive trade deals, with meaningful rights protections for workers, and security agreements could be conditioned on adhering to democratic governance and human rights norms. Democracy already comes with benefits. While autocracies have generally fostered conflict, economic stagnation, or kleptocracy, as evidenced in multiple academic studies, including the work of the Nobel Prize-winning economist Daron Acemoglu, democratic institutions reliably yield economic growth. 

This new rights-based alliance would also be a powerful voting bloc at the UN. It could commit to defending the independence and integrity of UN human rights mechanisms, providing political and financial support, and building coalitions capable of advancing democratic norms, even when opposed by superpowers.

Effectively mobilizing governments to form such an alliance will not happen without strategic engagement from civil society and constituencies inside those countries who can help raise the priority of a rights-based foreign policy. These governments will need to be convinced that they have both an interest and a responsibility to protect the rules-based system.

Projects of this nature are bubbling up. Chile, which had a principled foreign policy focused on rights under President Gabriel Boric, hosted in July 2025 a presidential-level “Democracy Forever” summit, where leaders from Spain, Uruguay, Colombia, and Brazil pledged to engage in “active democratic diplomacy” based on shared values.

The Hague Group, led by Malaysia, South Africa, and Colombia, formed in January 2025 in “defense of international law” and in solidarity with Palestinians. Over 70 countries from all regions signed a joint statement defending multilateralism at the UN. Earlier, in 2017, former Danish Prime Minister Anders Fogh Rasmussen set up the Alliance of Democracies Foundation to rally the dwindling ranks of democratic countries to “support each other against authoritarian pressures.”

Whatever its precise contours, an alliance of rights-respecting democracies would offer a hopeful counterpoint to the authoritarian trope of China’s and Russia’s leaders standing alongside North Korea’s Kim Jong Un, observing military hardware in a parade in Beijing’s Tiananmen Square in September. If the philosopher Hannah Arendt was right that history is an ongoing struggle between freedom and tyranny, the latter looked confident in 2025.

Yet, even in the worst of times, the idea of freedom and human rights is enduring. People power remains an engine for change. In the US, “No Kings” marches have drawn millions, protesters in Chicago, Minneapolis, Los Angeles, and around the country have stood up against the deployment of the National Guard and ICE abuses, and students are still organizing for Palestine on university campuses despite draconian crackdowns and visa revocations.

Buoyed by popular resistance, South Korean parliamentarians impeached their president to prevent him from grabbing power through martial law. Grassroots aid efforts by Sudan’s emergency response rooms, Hong Kong’s fire relief, Sri Lanka’s cyclone relief community kitchens, and Ukrainian mutual aid and solidarity collectives represent the best of this trend.

In 2025, Gen Z protests against corruption, inadequate public services, and poor governance in Nepal, Indonesia, and Morocco brought to the forefront the need for governments to listen to their youth and tackle corruption and inequality. But as the difficulties of restoring rights in Bangladesh after years under an authoritarian government illustrates, gains won through public mobilization can easily be lost unless democratic participation and free expression remain unassailable.