The global human rights system is in peril. Under relentless pressure from US President Donald Trump, and persistently undermined by China and Russia, the rules-based international order is being crushed, threatening to take with it the architecture human rights defenders have come to rely on to advance norms and protect freedoms. To defy this trend, governments that still value human rights, alongside social movements, civil society, and international institutions, need to form a strategic alliance to push back.
To be fair, the downward spiral predated Trump’s reelection. The democratic wave that began over 50 years ago has given way to what scholars term a “democratic recession.” Democracy is now back to 1985 levels according to some metrics, with 72 percent of the world’s population now living under autocracy. Russia and China are less free today than 20 years ago. And so is the United States.
Of course, democracy is not a panacea for human rights violations; the US and other longtime democracies have their own histories of colonial crimes, racism, abusive justice systems, and wartime atrocities. More recently, authoritarian leaders have exploited public mistrust and anger to win elections and then dismantled the very institutions that brought them to power. Democratic institutions are crucial to represent the will of the people and keep power in check. It’s no surprise that whenever democracy is undermined, rights are too, as evident in recent years in India, Türkiye, the Philippines, El Salvador, and Hungary.
FIRST: The Momentum Movement’s parliamentary representative David Bedo and independent member of parliament Akos Hadhazy protest against a law that bans Pride marches in Hungary and imposes fines on organizers and attendees of such events, Budapest, June 3, 2026. © 2025 Marton Monus/Reuters; SECOND: University students confront riot police in Istanbul’s Beşiktaş district following the arrest of Istanbul Mayor Ekrem İmamoğlu, June 3, 2026. © 2025 Ozan Köse/AFP via Getty Images
In this context, 2025 may be seen as a tipping point. In just 12 months, the Trump administration has carried out a broad assault on key pillars of US democracy and the global rules-based order, which the US, despite inconsistencies, was, with other states, instrumental in helping to establish.
In short order, Trump’s second-term administration has undermined trust in the sanctity of elections, reduced government accountability, gutted food assistance and healthcare subsidies, attacked judicial independence, defied court orders, rolled back women’s rights, obstructed access to abortion care, undermined remedies for racial harm, terminated programs mandating accessibility for people with disabilities, punished free speech, stripped protections from trans and intersex people, eroded privacy, and used government power to intimidate political opponents, the media, law firms, universities, civil society, and even comedians.
Claiming a risk of “civilizational erasure” in Europe and leaning on racist tropes to cast entire populations as unwelcome in the US, the Trump administration has embraced policies and rhetoric that align with white nationalist ideology. Immigrants and asylum seekers have been subjected to inhumane conditions and degrading treatment; 32 died in US Immigration and Customs Enforcement custody in 2025, and as of mid-January 2026, an additional 4 have died. Masked immigration enforcement agents have targeted people of color, using excessive force, terrorizing communities, wrongfully arresting scores of citizens, and, most recently, unjustifiably killing two people in Minneapolis, whose deaths Human Rights Watch has documented.
The US president of course has the authority to tighten US borders and enforce stricter immigration policies. The administration is not, however, entitled to deny legal process to asylum seekers, mistreat undocumented migrants, or unlawfully discriminate. In a well-functioning democracy, no electoral mandate should supersede domestic legislation, constitutional protections, or international human rights law. Trump’s team has repeatedly bypassed these guardrails.
The violations have not stopped at the border. The Trump administration used a 1798 law to send hundreds of Venezuelan migrants to an infamous prison in El Salvador, where they were tortured and sexually abused. Its blatantly unlawful strikes on boats in the Caribbean and the Pacific extrajudicially killed more than 120 people whom Trump claims were drug traffickers.
US Border Patrol Cmdr. Gregory Bovino (C) walks through a department store in St. Paul, Minnesota, June 3, 2026.
A Venezuelan migrant sits inside a cell at CECOT prison in Tecoluca, El Salvador, June 3, 2026.
After the US attacked Venezuela and apprehended its president, Nicolás Maduro, and his wife, Cilia Flores, Trump claimed the US would “run” the country and control its vast oil reserves. Despite paying lip service to human rights concerns under Maduro at the United Nations, Trump has worked with the same repressive apparatus to further US interests. Many Western allies have chosen to stay silent about these lawless moves, perhaps fearing erratic tariffs and blowback to their alliances.
Trump’s foreign policy has upended the foundations of the rules-based order that seeks to advance democracy and human rights, even if imperfectly.
Trump has boasted that he doesn’t “need international law” as a constraint, only his “own morality.” His administration has politicized the US State Department’s annual human rights report, stepped away from the global prohibition on antipersonnel landmines, voiced support for rewriting international rules on asylum, and skipped the UN’s Universal Periodic Review of the US’ human rights record.
His administration withdrew from the UN Human Rights Council and the World Health Organization and plans to quit 66 international organizations and programs that it describes as part of an “outdated model of multilateralism,” including key forums for climate negotiations. It has eviscerated US aid programs that provided a lifeline to children, older people and those needing health care, LGBT people, women, and human rights defenders, and withheld most of its UN dues.
Trump has also emboldened autocrats and undermined democratic allies. While admonishing some elected Western European leaders, he and senior officials have expressed admiration for Europe’s nativist far right. He has favored autocrats such as Hungary’s Prime Minister Viktor Orban, Türkiye’s President Recep Tayyip Erdoğan, and El Salvador’s President Nayib Bukele, while continuing decades of US support to Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman and Egypt’s President Abdel Fattah al-Sisi.
His administration has unjustifiably imposed sanctions to punish respected Palestinian human rights organizations, the International Criminal Court’s (ICC) prosecutor and many of its judges, a UN special rapporteur, and for several months, a Brazilian Supreme Court judge and his wife.
The institutional response in the US to Trump’s power grabs has been shockingly muted. Much of Congress, controlled by his own party, has not challenged his supercharged expansion of executive power. The leaders of the US’ most powerful technology companies have made significant donations and sought to placate the president. Some big law firms and prestigious universities have made deals rather than assert their independence, and some media organizations seem afraid to attract the president’s ire.
Has the US switched sides on the human rights playing field? While US engagement with human rights institutions has always been selective, China and Russia have long pursued an illiberal agenda. They stand much to gain from a US government that now expresses open hostility to universal rights. China and Russia remain strategic rivals of the US, but all three countries are now led by leaders who share open disdain for norms and institutions that could constrain their power.
Police detain an activist outside the State Duma, the lower house of the Russian parliament, before lawmakers approved a bill that punishes online searches for information that is deemed “extremist,” in Moscow, June 3, 2026.
Together, they wield considerable economic, military, and diplomatic power. If they were to consistently act as allies of convenience to erode global rules, they could threaten the entire system. Already, a loose international network of countries such as North Korea, Iran, Venezuela, Myanmar, Cuba, and Belarus work in concert with Russia and China. These leaders share very little ideologically but align in undermining human rights and promoting a regressive international agenda. In word and in practice, the US government is now helping them in this endeavor.
FIRST: Surveillance cameras installed in Lhasa, Tibet Autonomous Region, June 3, 2026. © 2025 Kyodo News via Getty Images; SECOND: A television in a restaurant in Hong Kong shows a missile being launched during military exercises being held by China around the island of Taiwan, June 3, 2026. © 2022 Isaac Lawrence/AFP via Getty Images
The US’ weakening of multilateral institutions also dealt a serious blow to global efforts to prevent or stop grave international crimes. The “never again” movement, born from the horrors of the Holocaust and reignited by the Rwandan and Bosnian genocides, spurred the UN General Assembly to embrace the Responsibility to Protect (R2P) in 2005. Meant to guide international intervention to prevent and stop atrocities in tandem with efforts to prosecute and punish serious crimes, R2P made a real difference in places like the Central African Republic and Kenya.
Today, R2P is rarely invoked and the ICC is under siege. In addition to Trump’s far-reaching sanctions, in December 2025 a Moscow court sentenced the ICC prosecutor and eight of its judges to prison terms in absentia. Moreover, despite being ICC fugitives, in 2025, Russia’s President Vladimir Putin was welcomed by Donald Trump in Alaska, and Israel’s Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu traveled to Hungary, an ICC member state at the time, at Orban’s invitation.
Twenty years ago, the US government and civil society were instrumental in galvanizing a response to mass atrocities in Darfur. Sudan is burning again, but this time under Trump, with relative impunity. Sudan’s Rapid Support Forces (RSF), which emerged from the militias that led the prior ethnic cleansing campaign, are again committing murder and rape on a mass scale. A growing body of evidence indicates that the UAE, a longtime US ally that recently made multi-billion-dollar deals with Trump, is providing the RSF with military support.
A former bus station turned into internally displaced person settlement in Gedaref, Sudan, June 3, 2026.
In the Occupied Palestinian Territory, the Israeli armed forces have committed acts of genocide, ethnic cleansing, and crimes against humanity, killing over 70,000 people since the October 2023 Hamas-led attacks on Israel and displacing the vast majority of Gaza’s population. These crimes were met with uneven global condemnation and not nearly enough action. Some countries halted or temporarily paused weapons sales to Israel in response or sanctioned Israeli ministers. Trump, however, continued a long-standing US policy of almost unconditional support to Israel, even as the International Court of Justice is weighing allegations of genocide and has issued binding orders under the Genocide Convention to protect Palestinians’ rights.
Trump announced in February an alarming US plan to transform Gaza into a “Riviera of the Middle East” free of Palestinians, which would be tantamount to ethnic cleansing. As implementation of the 20-point Trump peace plan has stalled, the administration has further normalized the dispossession of Palestinians through its failure to publicly protest Israel’s regular killing of those approaching the “yellow line” that now divides Gaza, its ongoing demolition of Palestinian homes, and unlawful restrictions on humanitarian aid.
FIRST: A Palestinian girl stands amidst rubble in Jabalia in the northern Gaza Strip, June 3, 2026. © 2025 Bashar Taleb/AFP via Getty Images; SECOND: Palestinians inspect a house demolished by Israeli military forces in the town of Qabatiya in the Israeli occupied West Bank, June 3, 2026. © 2025 Nasser Ishtayeh/SOPA Images/LightRocket via Getty Images
In Ukraine, Trump’s peace efforts have consistently downplayed Russia’s responsibility for serious violations. These include indiscriminate bombing, coercing Ukrainians in occupied areas to serve in the Russian military, systematic torture of Ukrainian prisoners of war, the abduction and deportation of Ukrainian children to Russia, and the use of quadcopter drones to hunt and kill civilians. Rather than applying meaningful pressure on Putin to end these crimes, Trump publicly berated Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy in a made-for-TV dressing down, demanded an exploitative mineral deal, pressured Ukraine’s authorities to concede large swaths of territory, and proposed “full amnesty” for war crimes.
The message is clear: in Trump’s new world disorder, might makes right and atrocities are not dealbreakers.
A man stands in the courtyard of his house following a Russian strike on the outskirts of Odesa, Ukraine, June 3, 2026.
Iqos iluma i vivid terracotta赤陶橘色煙機香港. Philip morris japan adds electric purple to iqos iluma i. 琥珀iqos 韓囯terea煙彈iluma. Iqos 3 duo which color better.
Iqos iluma 加熱煙機又有新的限量版顏色啦！ 為了慶祝 iqos 十周年紀念 iqos 推出 10th anniversary limited edition 限量版顏色，今次比較特別的是，每款機型各自只有一款特別配搭的顏色。 iqos iluma 系列加熱煙機推出 iqos 十周年紀念版，每款機型有獨自特別的混色搭配！.. Iqos 3 duo 改名為iqos originals duo， iqos originals duo 的主要升級改動是，四款標準顏色換了，由從前的黑白藍金，變為黑銀綠紅，隨機的小小清潔..
想入手 iqos originals duo，卻在顏色選擇上猶豫不決嗎？這篇文章將為你徹底解析每種顏色的獨特魅力與背後涵義，讓你不再煩惱，輕鬆找到最能展現個人風格的完美選擇！從沉穩的曜石黑到清新的暖白色，再到充滿活力的珊瑚藍，我們將深入分析每種顏色適合的人格特質與穿搭建議，幫助你打造質感. Tw › articles › 019b607124a564ad33cciqos originals duo不同顏色有什麼區別？ 鉅城直播娛樂平台. 從前的iqos 3 duo 有lucid teal 淺綠色限量版，iqos originals one 有turquoise 綠松色，今次的iqos iluma i prime 就推出一個aspen green 山楊綠色.
Tw › articles › 019b607124a564ad33cciqos originals duo不同顏色有什麼區別？ 鉅城直播娛樂平台. 0 的功能上升級外，顏色上也首次推出變漸色效果。, Com︰iqos iluma one 套裝香港現貨價錢吸引.
Iqos iluma 限定色 蓝色彩虹 六代系列 iqos originals one 五代一体机 iqos iluma 六代侧开.. Iqos 3 duo 改名為iqos originals duo， iqos originals duo 的主要升級改動是，四款標準顏色換了，由從前的黑白藍金，變為黑銀綠紅，隨機的小小清潔..
Iqos originals are currently available in 4 colors scarlet turquoise silver slate looking for personalization. 色, iqos, 鵝卵石米色, 口袋充電器卵石色 iqos iluma i one 加熱菸草設備使用 iqos originals duo 設備綜合使用者指南，涵蓋設定、使用、清潔、故障排除以及. Iqos originals duo slate black buy online. Tw › articles › 019b7f57e70cd5cf11c4iqos originals 顏色哪個最好看？ 鉅城直播娛樂平台 鉅城直播娛樂. 0 限量特別版的淺藍色加熱煙機，顏色鮮艷明亮，更具活力！ 近期流行淺藍色，iqos iluma 有淺藍色的 we edition，電子煙機 relx 的淺藍色也非常受歡迎，現在 lil solid 2.
Which colors are available for iqos originals in the u, Iqos 的藍色加熱煙機一直以來都是最受歡迎的顏色之一，近期的藍色煙機主要轉向以淺藍色為主。 iqos 藍色一體機加熱煙機大晒冷iqos iluma i one iqos. Three models covered with, Iqos iluma i one 有著精緻小巧的設計，可讓您最多連續使用20 次。 全新flexpuff 功能讓您按照自己的節奏暢享美妙的. Iqos iluma i one 有著精緻小巧的設計，可讓您最多連續使用20 次。 全新flexpuff 功能讓您按照自己的節奏暢享美妙的. Iqos 3 duo 顏色選擇︰白色、灰黑色、金色、藍色、銅紅色、青綠色，和磨砂紅。 購買iqos 3 duo combo 顏色自由選價錢特惠組合白色綠色藍色混.
Philip morris japan adds electric purple to iqos iluma i. Discover the new iqos originals duo device iqos maldives. Iqos originals duo silver buy online. Three models covered with.
ricarica completa iqos 3 multi Customize your iqos originals device with colorful sleeve, cap, and door accessories, in the following colors sleeve colors 5 scarlet eventide blue amber orange turquoise slate. Tw › articles › 019b7f57e70cd5cf11c4iqos originals 顏色哪個最好看？ 鉅城直播娛樂平台 鉅城直播娛樂. New iqos originals one heated tobacco device in 4 vibrant colors red, silver, iqos originals one. 0 限量特別版的淺藍色加熱煙機，顏色鮮艷明亮，更具活力！ 近期流行淺藍色，iqos iluma 有淺藍色的 we edition，電子煙機 relx 的淺藍色也非常受歡迎，現在 lil solid 2. 0 的功能上升級外，顏色上也首次推出變漸色效果。. rj01118876
shatercast fanbox 雪松原味iqos 日版terea煙彈iluma one專用松檀辛 28%. 0 的功能上升級外，顏色上也首次推出變漸色效果。. Iqos originals are currently available in 4 colors scarlet turquoise silver slate looking for personalization. 想入手 iqos originals duo，卻被琳瑯滿目的顏色選擇搞得眼花撩亂嗎？這篇文章將為你徹底解析各顏色版本的特色與區別，從經典到潮流，各種風格應有盡有，讓你輕鬆找到最襯托你個性的那一款！我們深入比較不同顏色的材質與觸感，並提供實用選色建議，無論你是追求簡約、時尚，還是獨特風格. New iqos originals one heated tobacco device in 4 vibrant colors red, silver, iqos originals one. rule 43 디시
sj 104 sex 想換新 iqos originals 但顏色選擇困難嗎？ 這篇文章為你詳細解析 iqos originals 各種顏色的特色與風格，從經典的曜石黑、鉑金灰到時尚的暖玉白、森海藍、日落橙，甚至特別的限量款，讓你一網打盡！. 對於鍾情於第一代煙彈，喜歡它比較濃醇口感的加熱煙煙民，就要把握機會買多點作庫存了！ 注意︰iqos heets 煙彈要用 iqos 3 duo iqos originals 系列加熱煙機，或 lil2 或 lil2plus 煙機加熱，不可以使用 iqos iluma 加熱煙機來加熱。. 0 的功能上升級外，顏色上也首次推出變漸色效果。. Iqos iluma 加熱煙機又有新的限量版顏色啦！ 為了慶祝 iqos 十周年紀念 iqos 推出 10th anniversary limited edition 限量版顏色，今次比較特別的是，每款機型各自只有一款特別配搭的顏色。 iqos iluma 系列加熱煙機推出 iqos 十周年紀念版，每款機型有獨自特別的混色搭配！. 0 plus 加熱煙機，除了在 lil solid 2. secrets of the silent witch 티비 쇼
single salma aznude Iqos iluma i vivid terracotta赤陶橘色煙機香港. 0 限量特別版的淺藍色加熱煙機，顏色鮮艷明亮，更具活力！ 近期流行淺藍色，iqos iluma 有淺藍色的 we edition，電子煙機 relx 的淺藍色也非常受歡迎，現在 lil solid 2. 0 也有它的淺藍色特別版。 想與眾不同，想突破單調，就要把握機會了。. Iqos iluma i prime aspen green 山楊綠深綠色新顏色登場. Pmj adds a new standard color, electric purple, to the iqos iluma i lineup, rolling out in japan from jan.
seekheart 디시 想入手 iqos originals duo 但顏色選擇讓人眼花撩亂？別擔心！這篇文章為你徹底解析 iqos originals duo 的所有顏色，從經典石墨黑到潮流赤焰紅，應有盡有。更提供選購建議，教你如何挑選最能展現個人風格的 iqos originals duo！無論你是商務人士、文藝青年，還是個性鮮明的年輕人，都能在這裡找到你的. Com︰iqos originals one iqos heets iqos marlbolo 第一代煙彈專用可連續使用20+次的iqos原廠加熱煙機香港現貨價錢吸引黑色銀色藍綠色紅色iqos香港加熱. 想為你的 iqos 挑選最適合的顏色嗎？ 這篇文章將徹底解析 iqos 在台灣上架的豐富色彩選擇，從經典穩重的深邃藍、石墨灰，到潮流吸睛的珊瑚紅、薄荷綠，甚至是不定期推出的限量版，讓你輕鬆找到能展現個人風格的完美 iqos！. 對於鍾情於第一代煙彈，喜歡它比較濃醇口感的加熱煙煙民，就要把握機會買多點作庫存了！ 注意︰iqos heets 煙彈要用 iqos 3 duo iqos originals 系列加熱煙機，或 lil2 或 lil2plus 煙機加熱，不可以使用 iqos iluma 加熱煙機來加熱。. Tw › articles › 019b607124a564ad33cciqos originals duo不同顏色有什麼區別？ 鉅城直播娛樂平台.
Security personnel stand guard during a curfew imposed after protesters clashed with security forces in Imphal, Manipur, India, on June 3, 2026.
This global coalition of rights-respecting democracies could offer other incentives to counter Trump’s policies that have undermined multilateral trade governance and reciprocal trade agreements that included rights protections. Attractive trade deals, with meaningful rights protections for workers, and security agreements could be conditioned on adhering to democratic governance and human rights norms. Democracy already comes with benefits. While autocracies have generally fostered conflict, economic stagnation, or kleptocracy, as evidenced in multiple academic studies, including the work of the Nobel Prize-winning economist Daron Acemoglu, democratic institutions reliably yield economic growth.
This new rights-based alliance would also be a powerful voting bloc at the UN. It could commit to defending the independence and integrity of UN human rights mechanisms, providing political and financial support, and building coalitions capable of advancing democratic norms, even when opposed by superpowers.
Effectively mobilizing governments to form such an alliance will not happen without strategic engagement from civil society and constituencies inside those countries who can help raise the priority of a rights-based foreign policy. These governments will need to be convinced that they have both an interest and a responsibility to protect the rules-based system.
Projects of this nature are bubbling up. Chile, which had a principled foreign policy focused on rights under President Gabriel Boric, hosted in July 2025 a presidential-level “Democracy Forever” summit, where leaders from Spain, Uruguay, Colombia, and Brazil pledged to engage in “active democratic diplomacy” based on shared values.
The Hague Group, led by Malaysia, South Africa, and Colombia, formed in January 2025 in “defense of international law” and in solidarity with Palestinians. Over 70 countries from all regions signed a joint statement defending multilateralism at the UN. Earlier, in 2017, former Danish Prime Minister Anders Fogh Rasmussen set up the Alliance of Democracies Foundation to rally the dwindling ranks of democratic countries to “support each other against authoritarian pressures.”
Whatever its precise contours, an alliance of rights-respecting democracies would offer a hopeful counterpoint to the authoritarian trope of China’s and Russia’s leaders standing alongside North Korea’s Kim Jong Un, observing military hardware in a parade in Beijing’s Tiananmen Square in September. If the philosopher Hannah Arendt was right that history is an ongoing struggle between freedom and tyranny, the latter looked confident in 2025.
Yet, even in the worst of times, the idea of freedom and human rights is enduring. People power remains an engine for change. In the US, “No Kings” marches have drawn millions, protesters in Chicago, Minneapolis, Los Angeles, and around the country have stood up against the deployment of the National Guard and ICE abuses, and students are still organizing for Palestine on university campuses despite draconian crackdowns and visa revocations.
People gather facing law enforcement after marching through downtown Austin, Texas at the conclusion of the "No Kings Day" demonstration in the US, June 3, 2026.
Buoyed by popular resistance, South Korean parliamentarians impeached their president to prevent him from grabbing power through martial law. Grassroots aid efforts by Sudan’s emergency response rooms, Hong Kong’s fire relief, Sri Lanka’s cyclone relief community kitchens, and Ukrainian mutual aid and solidarity collectives represent the best of this trend.
In 2025, Gen Z protests against corruption, inadequate public services, and poor governance in Nepal, Indonesia, and Morocco brought to the forefront the need for governments to listen to their youth and tackle corruption and inequality. But as the difficulties of restoring rights in Bangladesh after years under an authoritarian government illustrates, gains won through public mobilization can easily be lost unless democratic participation and free expression remain unassailable.
People take part in a youth-led protest against corruption and calling for education and healthcare reforms, in Rabat, Morocco, June 3, 2026.
Demonstrators outside Nepal's Parliament during a protest in Kathmandu condemning social media prohibitions and corruption by the government, June 3, 2026.
In this more hostile world, civil society is more critical than ever. It’s also increasingly endangered, particularly in an environment where funding is scarce. In 2025, Human Rights Watch was labeled “undesirable” and banned from operating in Russia. For partners in Egypt, Hong Kong, and India, these tactics are all too familiar. Restrictions on civil society and protest have become more commonplace in Europe, including the UK and France. And now, for the first time, many worry about risks associated with their operational presence in the US, where the Open Society Foundations, a major donor, have already been threatened, and the administration is preparing a list of “domestic terrorists” under overbroad guidance that could be interpreted to include the work of many progressive groups.
Breaking the authoritarian wave and standing up for human rights is a generational challenge. In 2026, it will play out most acutely in the US, with far-reaching consequences for the rest of the world. Fighting back will require a determined, strategic, and coordinated reaction from voters, civil society, multilateral institutions, and rights-respecting governments around the globe.
Iqos 3 duo 改名為iqos originals duo， iqos originals duo 的主要升級改動是，四款標準顏色換了，由從前的黑白藍金，變為黑銀綠紅，隨機的小小清潔., Human Rights Watch’s 36th annual review of human rights practices and trends around the globe, reviews developments in more than 100 countries.
