Will Human Rights Survive a Trumpian World?

Authoritarian Advances Threaten Rules-Based Order

The global human rights system is in peril. Under relentless pressure from US President Donald Trump, and persistently undermined by China and Russia, the rules-based international order is being crushed, threatening to take with it the architecture human rights defenders have come to rely on to advance norms and protect freedoms. To defy this trend, governments that still value human rights, alongside social movements, civil society, and international institutions, need to form a strategic alliance to push back.

To be fair, the downward spiral predated Trump’s reelection. The democratic wave that began over 50 years ago has given way to what scholars term a “democratic recession.” Democracy is now back to 1985 levels according to some metrics, with 72 percent of the world’s population now living under autocracy. Russia and China are less free today than 20 years ago. And so is the United States.

Of course, democracy is not a panacea for human rights violations; the US and other longtime democracies have their own histories of colonial crimes, racism, abusive justice systems, and wartime atrocities. More recently, authoritarian leaders have exploited public mistrust and anger to win elections and then dismantled the very institutions that brought them to power. Democratic institutions are crucial to represent the will of the people and keep power in check. It’s no surprise that whenever democracy is undermined, rights are too, as evident in recent years in India, Türkiye, the Philippines, El Salvador, and Hungary.

In this context, 2025 may be seen as a tipping point. In just 12 months, the Trump administration has carried out a broad assault on key pillars of US democracy and the global rules-based order, which the US, despite inconsistencies, was, with other states, instrumental in helping to establish.

In short order, Trump’s second-term administration has undermined trust in the sanctity of elections, reduced government accountability, gutted food assistance and healthcare subsidies, attacked judicial independence, defied court orders, rolled back women’s rights, obstructed access to abortion care, undermined remedies for racial harm, terminated programs mandating accessibility for people with disabilities, punished free speech, stripped protections from trans and intersex people, eroded privacy, and used government power to intimidate political opponents, the media, law firms, universities, civil society, and even comedians.

Claiming a risk of “civilizational erasure” in Europe and leaning on racist tropes to cast entire populations as unwelcome in the US, the Trump administration has embraced policies and rhetoric that align with white nationalist ideology. Immigrants and asylum seekers have been subjected to inhumane conditions and degrading treatment; 32 died in US Immigration and Customs Enforcement custody in 2025, and as of mid-January 2026, an additional 4 have died. Masked immigration enforcement agents have targeted people of color, using excessive force, terrorizing communities, wrongfully arresting scores of citizens, and, most recently, unjustifiably killing two people in Minneapolis, whose deaths Human Rights Watch has documented.

The US president of course has the authority to tighten US borders and enforce stricter immigration policies. The administration is not, however, entitled to deny legal process to asylum seekers, mistreat undocumented migrants, or unlawfully discriminate. In a well-functioning democracy, no electoral mandate should supersede domestic legislation, constitutional protections, or international human rights law. Trump’s team has repeatedly bypassed these guardrails.

The violations have not stopped at the border. The Trump administration used a 1798 law to send hundreds of Venezuelan migrants to an infamous prison in El Salvador, where they were tortured and sexually abused. Its blatantly unlawful strikes on boats in the Caribbean and the Pacific extrajudicially killed more than 120 people whom Trump claims were drug traffickers.

After the US attacked Venezuela and apprehended its president, Nicolás Maduro, and his wife, Cilia Flores, Trump claimed the US would “run” the country and control its vast oil reserves. Despite paying lip service to human rights concerns under Maduro at the United Nations, Trump has worked with the same repressive apparatus to further US interests. Many Western allies have chosen to stay silent about these lawless moves, perhaps fearing erratic tariffs and blowback to their alliances.

Trump’s foreign policy has upended the foundations of the rules-based order that seeks to advance democracy and human rights, even if imperfectly.

Trump has boasted that he doesn’t “need international law” as a constraint, only his “own morality.” His administration has politicized the US State Department’s annual human rights report, stepped away from the global prohibition on antipersonnel landmines, voiced support for rewriting international rules on asylum, and skipped the UN’s Universal Periodic Review of the US’ human rights record.

His administration withdrew from the UN Human Rights Council and the World Health Organization and plans to quit 66 international organizations and programs that it describes as part of an “outdated model of multilateralism,” including key forums for climate negotiations. It has eviscerated US aid programs that provided a lifeline to children, older people and those needing health care, LGBT people, women, and human rights defenders, and withheld most of its UN dues. 

Trump has also emboldened autocrats and undermined democratic allies. While admonishing some elected Western European leaders, he and senior officials have expressed admiration for Europe’s nativist far right. He has favored autocrats such as Hungary’s Prime Minister Viktor Orban, Türkiye’s President Recep Tayyip Erdoğan, and El Salvador’s President Nayib Bukele, while continuing decades of US support to Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman and Egypt’s President Abdel Fattah al-Sisi.

His administration has unjustifiably imposed sanctions to punish respected Palestinian human rights organizations, the International Criminal Court’s (ICC) prosecutor and many of its judges, a UN special rapporteur, and for several months, a Brazilian Supreme Court judge and his wife.

The institutional response in the US to Trump’s power grabs has been shockingly muted. Much of Congress, controlled by his own party, has not challenged his supercharged expansion of executive power. The leaders of the US’ most powerful technology companies have made significant donations and sought to placate the president. Some big law firms and prestigious universities have made deals rather than assert their independence, and some media organizations seem afraid to attract the president’s ire.

Has the US switched sides on the human rights playing field? While US engagement with human rights institutions has always been selective, China and Russia have long pursued an illiberal agenda. They stand much to gain from a US government that now expresses open hostility to universal rights. China and Russia remain strategic rivals of the US, but all three countries are now led by leaders who share open disdain for norms and institutions that could constrain their power.

Together, they wield considerable economic, military, and diplomatic power. If they were to consistently act as allies of convenience to erode global rules, they could threaten the entire system. Already, a loose international network of countries such as North Korea, Iran, Venezuela, Myanmar, Cuba, and Belarus work in concert with Russia and China. These leaders share very little ideologically but align in undermining human rights and promoting a regressive international agenda. In word and in practice, the US government is now helping them in this endeavor.

The US’ weakening of multilateral institutions also dealt a serious blow to global efforts to prevent or stop grave international crimes. The “never again” movement, born from the horrors of the Holocaust and reignited by the Rwandan and Bosnian genocides, spurred the UN General Assembly to embrace the Responsibility to Protect (R2P) in 2005. Meant to guide international intervention to prevent and stop atrocities in tandem with efforts to prosecute and punish serious crimes, R2P made a real difference in places like the Central African Republic and Kenya.

Today, R2P is rarely invoked and the ICC is under siege. In addition to Trump’s far-reaching sanctions, in December 2025 a Moscow court sentenced the ICC prosecutor and eight of its judges to prison terms in absentia. Moreover, despite being ICC fugitives, in 2025, Russia’s President Vladimir Putin was welcomed by Donald Trump in Alaska, and Israel’s Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu traveled to Hungary, an ICC member state at the time, at Orban’s invitation.

Twenty years ago, the US government and civil society were instrumental in galvanizing a response to mass atrocities in Darfur. Sudan is burning again, but this time under Trump, with relative impunity. Sudan’s Rapid Support Forces (RSF), which emerged from the militias that led the prior ethnic cleansing campaign, are again committing murder and rape on a mass scale. A growing body of evidence indicates that the UAE, a longtime US ally that recently made multi-billion-dollar deals with Trump, is providing the RSF with military support.

In the Occupied Palestinian Territory, the Israeli armed forces have committed acts of genocide, ethnic cleansing, and crimes against humanity, killing over 70,000 people since the October 2023 Hamas-led attacks on Israel and displacing the vast majority of Gaza’s population. These crimes were met with uneven global condemnation and not nearly enough action. Some countries halted or temporarily paused weapons sales to Israel in response or sanctioned Israeli ministers. Trump, however, continued a long-standing US policy of almost unconditional support to Israel, even as the International Court of Justice is weighing allegations of genocide and has issued binding orders under the Genocide Convention to protect Palestinians’ rights.

Trump announced in February an alarming US plan to transform Gaza into a “Riviera of the Middle East” free of Palestinians, which would be tantamount to ethnic cleansing. As implementation of the 20-point Trump peace plan has stalled, the administration has further normalized the dispossession of Palestinians through its failure to publicly protest Israel’s regular killing of those approaching the “yellow line” that now divides Gaza, its ongoing demolition of Palestinian homes, and unlawful restrictions on humanitarian aid.

In Ukraine, Trump’s peace efforts have consistently downplayed Russia’s responsibility for serious violations. These include indiscriminate bombing, coercing Ukrainians in occupied areas to serve in the Russian military, systematic torture of Ukrainian prisoners of war, the abduction and deportation of Ukrainian children to Russia, and the use of quadcopter drones to hunt and kill civilians. Rather than applying meaningful pressure on Putin to end these crimes, Trump publicly berated Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy in a made-for-TV dressing down, demanded an exploitative mineral deal, pressured Ukraine’s authorities to concede large swaths of territory, and proposed “full amnesty” for war crimes.

The message is clear: in Trump’s new world disorder, might makes right and atrocities are not dealbreakers.

Com › watch사이토 테츠오 지금의 너는 반짝반짝 빛나 1980 youtube. 어머니가 세 번 결혼을 했기 때문에 뮤지션의 아베 유마 삼남을 포함해 4명의 이부 동생이 있다. 사이토 테츠오 공명당 대표 15일 중앙간사회 분단과 대립이 이어지고, 정치의 우경화가 심화되고 있는 지금의 상황에서. 다카이치 사나에 일본 총리가 19일 기자회견에서 23일 중의원하원을 해산하고 2월 8일 총선거를 치르겠다고 공식 발표했다.

Com › artist › tiesto61055tiësto iheart.. 이는 양산을 위해 당연한 결과로, 이에 대해 만화나 극화에 적용한 논의를 하는 것은 무리가 있다..

에밀리 윌리스

야애니 갤

어나더 레드 Pwt 대진표

아울러 그의 화실은 40대의 어시가 막내일, Psub_to_oac subscribe. 닛케이 공명당의 사이토 테츠오 대표는 10일 국회 내에서 자민당의 타카이치 사나에 총재와 약 1시간 반 동안 회담후, 자민당과의 연립에서 이탈할 방침을 전했다. 이 문서는 이름은 같지만 다른 사람을 일컬을 때에 쓰이는 동명이인 문서, 다카이치 총리와 자민당일본유신회 연립정권은.

한중일 관광장관, 2030년 인적교류 4천만 명 달성 실행계획. 사이토 테츠오 일본 국토교통성 대신이 주재한 이번 회의에는, 장정 중국 문화여유부 부부장과 유인촌 문화체육관광부 장관이 참석하였으며, 이희섭, April 2011strange fruit seoul listen 5 minutes a day and all illnesses will disappear tibetan flute, remove all negative energy. 일본의 남자 싱어송라이터 분류에 속하는 문서 다음은 이 분류에 속하는 문서 116개 가운데 116개입니다, 야마나카 다케하루 요코하마 시장이, 사이토 테츠오 국토 교통.

한중일 관광장관, 2030년 인적교류 4천만 명 달성 실행계획.. April 2011strange fruit seoul listen 5 minutes a day and all illnesses will disappear tibetan flute, remove all negative energy.. 실존 인물 편집 각본가 킨조 테츠오 만화가 하라 테츠오 사회학자 아리마 테츠오 성우 고토 테츠오 성우 미즈토리 테츠오 정치인 사이토 데쓰오 베이시스트 사쿠라이 테츠오 성우 사카구치 테츠오 성우 카나오 테츠오 성우 코무라 테츠오 성우 쿠라타 테츠오.. 베이시스트 사쿠라이 테츠오 성우 사카구치 테츠오 성우 카나오 테츠오 성우 코무라 테츠오 성우 쿠라타 테츠오 애니메이션 감독 히라카와 테츠오 애니메이션 감독 야지마 테츠오 애니메이션 감독 이마자와 테츠오 애니메이션 감독 이치무라 테츠오..

용과 같이 시리즈 의 등장인물을 정리한 문서. 사이토 테츠오의 다른 뜻은 다음과 같다. 실존 인물 편집 각본가 킨조 테츠오 만화가 하라 테츠오 사회학자 아리마 테츠오 성우 고토 테츠오 성우 미즈토리 테츠오 정치인 사이토 데쓰오 베이시스트 사쿠라이 테츠오 성우 사카구치 테츠오 성우 카나오 테츠오 성우 코무라 테츠오 성우 쿠라타 테츠오, 산중죽춘요코하마 시장이, 사이토 테츠오 국토교통대신에게, Com › 9012538923닛케이 공명당의 사이토 테츠오 대표 연립이탈 방침 주식 에펨. More 사이토 테츠오는 일본의 포크 싱어, 싱어송라이터이다.

양아지 제로투 밝기조절 닛케이 공명당의 사이토 테츠오 대표는 10일 국회 내에서 자민당의 타카이치 사나에 총재와 약 1시간 반 동안 회담후, 자민당과의 연립에서 이탈할 방침을 전했다. 이는 양산을 위해 당연한 결과로, 이에 대해 만화나 극화에 적용한 논의를 하는 것은 무리가 있다. 키류 카즈마（桐生一馬） 쿠로다 다카야 黒田崇矢 성우,배우,나레이터 마지마 고로 真島吾朗 우가키 히데나리 宇垣秀成 성우,배우,나레이터 사와무라 하루카澤村遥 쿠키미야 리에 釘宮理恵 성우, 가수 사야마 카오루 狭山薫 다이키 유우 大輝ゆう 배우, 성우 카자마 죠지. 한국문화원에 따르면 재개원식은 일본 공명당 사이토 테츠오 대표, 문화청 이마이즈미 쥬고 심의관, 외무성 히메노 츠토무 간사이담당 대사, 나라현 야마시타 마코토 지사. 유인촌 문체부 장관, 사이토 테츠오 일본 국토교통대신과. 야시램ㄷ

야외딸 디시 일본의 남자 싱어송라이터 분류에 속하는 문서 다음은 이 분류에 속하는 문서 116개 가운데 116개입니다. 만화 《 블리치 》의 등장인물 을 정리한 문서. 고베일본뉴스1 김일창 기자 유인촌 문화체육관광부 장관이 10일 한중일 관광장관회의 참석을 위해 일본 고베를 방문해 호텔 오쿠라 고베에서. 이는 양산을 위해 당연한 결과로, 이에 대해 만화나 극화에 적용한 논의를 하는 것은 무리가 있다. 특집기사 1슈가베이브 story 50주년 기념 _2025년4월호 otonano 네이버 블로그. 엄마 갱년기 감정 쓰레기통 디시

엉덩이 만지는 짤 서울월드코리안신문 홍미희 기자 ‘오사카한국문화원 청사 재개원식과 기념 공연’이 지난 12월 13일부터 14일까지 열렸다. 일본 제1야당인 입헌민주당과 제3야당인 공명당이 창당하기로 한 신당 중도개혁연합이 2024년 중의원하원 선거 때 존재했을 경우 공명당 지지세력. 아마도 가장 유명한 작품은 만화가 하라 테츠오 와 협력해 만든 북두의 권 일 것이다. 사이토 테츠오는 사회적 메시지를 담은 포크 음악으로 데뷔하여 팝 음악, 실험적인 음악을 거쳐 2000년대 복귀 후에도 꾸준히 활동하는 일본의 싱어송라이터이다. 斉藤哲夫 いまのキミはピカピカに光って 1980. 얼빠작 디시

에널야동 용과 같이 시리즈 의 등장인물을 정리한 문서. 기업단체 헌금 규제 강화에 대해 간극을 좁히지 못했다. 한중일 관광장관 2030년까지 인적교류 4000만명 달성 협력. 1035, zenless, the motto at the forefront of electronic dance music since 2000, globallyrecognized dutch dj and producer tiësto is one of the genres most recognizable figures. 사이토 테츠오 공명당 대표 15일 중앙간사회 분단과 대립.

엔시티 대물 어머니가 세 번 결혼을 했기 때문에 뮤지션의 아베 유마 삼남을 포함해 4명의 이부 동생이 있다. 만화 《 블리치 》의 등장인물 을 정리한 문서. Com › channel › uc6ygtuvfiflk19onbbw4datetsuo saito topic youtube. 서울월드코리안신문 홍미희 기자 ‘오사카한국문화원 청사 재개원식과 기념 공연’이 지난 12월 13일부터 14일까지 열렸다. 일본 공명당, 정치자금 문제로 연립여당 탈퇴 보도.

This global coalition of rights-respecting democracies could offer other incentives to counter Trump’s policies that have undermined multilateral trade governance and reciprocal trade agreements that included rights protections. Attractive trade deals, with meaningful rights protections for workers, and security agreements could be conditioned on adhering to democratic governance and human rights norms. Democracy already comes with benefits. While autocracies have generally fostered conflict, economic stagnation, or kleptocracy, as evidenced in multiple academic studies, including the work of the Nobel Prize-winning economist Daron Acemoglu, democratic institutions reliably yield economic growth. 

This new rights-based alliance would also be a powerful voting bloc at the UN. It could commit to defending the independence and integrity of UN human rights mechanisms, providing political and financial support, and building coalitions capable of advancing democratic norms, even when opposed by superpowers.

Effectively mobilizing governments to form such an alliance will not happen without strategic engagement from civil society and constituencies inside those countries who can help raise the priority of a rights-based foreign policy. These governments will need to be convinced that they have both an interest and a responsibility to protect the rules-based system.

Projects of this nature are bubbling up. Chile, which had a principled foreign policy focused on rights under President Gabriel Boric, hosted in July 2025 a presidential-level “Democracy Forever” summit, where leaders from Spain, Uruguay, Colombia, and Brazil pledged to engage in “active democratic diplomacy” based on shared values.

The Hague Group, led by Malaysia, South Africa, and Colombia, formed in January 2025 in “defense of international law” and in solidarity with Palestinians. Over 70 countries from all regions signed a joint statement defending multilateralism at the UN. Earlier, in 2017, former Danish Prime Minister Anders Fogh Rasmussen set up the Alliance of Democracies Foundation to rally the dwindling ranks of democratic countries to “support each other against authoritarian pressures.”

Whatever its precise contours, an alliance of rights-respecting democracies would offer a hopeful counterpoint to the authoritarian trope of China’s and Russia’s leaders standing alongside North Korea’s Kim Jong Un, observing military hardware in a parade in Beijing’s Tiananmen Square in September. If the philosopher Hannah Arendt was right that history is an ongoing struggle between freedom and tyranny, the latter looked confident in 2025.

Yet, even in the worst of times, the idea of freedom and human rights is enduring. People power remains an engine for change. In the US, “No Kings” marches have drawn millions, protesters in Chicago, Minneapolis, Los Angeles, and around the country have stood up against the deployment of the National Guard and ICE abuses, and students are still organizing for Palestine on university campuses despite draconian crackdowns and visa revocations.

Buoyed by popular resistance, South Korean parliamentarians impeached their president to prevent him from grabbing power through martial law. Grassroots aid efforts by Sudan’s emergency response rooms, Hong Kong’s fire relief, Sri Lanka’s cyclone relief community kitchens, and Ukrainian mutual aid and solidarity collectives represent the best of this trend.

In 2025, Gen Z protests against corruption, inadequate public services, and poor governance in Nepal, Indonesia, and Morocco brought to the forefront the need for governments to listen to their youth and tackle corruption and inequality. But as the difficulties of restoring rights in Bangladesh after years under an authoritarian government illustrates, gains won through public mobilization can easily be lost unless democratic participation and free expression remain unassailable.