Will Human Rights Survive a Trumpian World?

Authoritarian Advances Threaten Rules-Based Order

The global human rights system is in peril. Under relentless pressure from US President Donald Trump, and persistently undermined by China and Russia, the rules-based international order is being crushed, threatening to take with it the architecture human rights defenders have come to rely on to advance norms and protect freedoms. To defy this trend, governments that still value human rights, alongside social movements, civil society, and international institutions, need to form a strategic alliance to push back.

To be fair, the downward spiral predated Trump’s reelection. The democratic wave that began over 50 years ago has given way to what scholars term a “democratic recession.” Democracy is now back to 1985 levels according to some metrics, with 72 percent of the world’s population now living under autocracy. Russia and China are less free today than 20 years ago. And so is the United States.

Of course, democracy is not a panacea for human rights violations; the US and other longtime democracies have their own histories of colonial crimes, racism, abusive justice systems, and wartime atrocities. More recently, authoritarian leaders have exploited public mistrust and anger to win elections and then dismantled the very institutions that brought them to power. Democratic institutions are crucial to represent the will of the people and keep power in check. It’s no surprise that whenever democracy is undermined, rights are too, as evident in recent years in India, Türkiye, the Philippines, El Salvador, and Hungary.

In this context, 2025 may be seen as a tipping point. In just 12 months, the Trump administration has carried out a broad assault on key pillars of US democracy and the global rules-based order, which the US, despite inconsistencies, was, with other states, instrumental in helping to establish.

In short order, Trump’s second-term administration has undermined trust in the sanctity of elections, reduced government accountability, gutted food assistance and healthcare subsidies, attacked judicial independence, defied court orders, rolled back women’s rights, obstructed access to abortion care, undermined remedies for racial harm, terminated programs mandating accessibility for people with disabilities, punished free speech, stripped protections from trans and intersex people, eroded privacy, and used government power to intimidate political opponents, the media, law firms, universities, civil society, and even comedians.

Claiming a risk of “civilizational erasure” in Europe and leaning on racist tropes to cast entire populations as unwelcome in the US, the Trump administration has embraced policies and rhetoric that align with white nationalist ideology. Immigrants and asylum seekers have been subjected to inhumane conditions and degrading treatment; 32 died in US Immigration and Customs Enforcement custody in 2025, and as of mid-January 2026, an additional 4 have died. Masked immigration enforcement agents have targeted people of color, using excessive force, terrorizing communities, wrongfully arresting scores of citizens, and, most recently, unjustifiably killing two people in Minneapolis, whose deaths Human Rights Watch has documented.

The US president of course has the authority to tighten US borders and enforce stricter immigration policies. The administration is not, however, entitled to deny legal process to asylum seekers, mistreat undocumented migrants, or unlawfully discriminate. In a well-functioning democracy, no electoral mandate should supersede domestic legislation, constitutional protections, or international human rights law. Trump’s team has repeatedly bypassed these guardrails.

The violations have not stopped at the border. The Trump administration used a 1798 law to send hundreds of Venezuelan migrants to an infamous prison in El Salvador, where they were tortured and sexually abused. Its blatantly unlawful strikes on boats in the Caribbean and the Pacific extrajudicially killed more than 120 people whom Trump claims were drug traffickers.

After the US attacked Venezuela and apprehended its president, Nicolás Maduro, and his wife, Cilia Flores, Trump claimed the US would “run” the country and control its vast oil reserves. Despite paying lip service to human rights concerns under Maduro at the United Nations, Trump has worked with the same repressive apparatus to further US interests. Many Western allies have chosen to stay silent about these lawless moves, perhaps fearing erratic tariffs and blowback to their alliances.

Trump’s foreign policy has upended the foundations of the rules-based order that seeks to advance democracy and human rights, even if imperfectly.

Trump has boasted that he doesn’t “need international law” as a constraint, only his “own morality.” His administration has politicized the US State Department’s annual human rights report, stepped away from the global prohibition on antipersonnel landmines, voiced support for rewriting international rules on asylum, and skipped the UN’s Universal Periodic Review of the US’ human rights record.

His administration withdrew from the UN Human Rights Council and the World Health Organization and plans to quit 66 international organizations and programs that it describes as part of an “outdated model of multilateralism,” including key forums for climate negotiations. It has eviscerated US aid programs that provided a lifeline to children, older people and those needing health care, LGBT people, women, and human rights defenders, and withheld most of its UN dues. 

Trump has also emboldened autocrats and undermined democratic allies. While admonishing some elected Western European leaders, he and senior officials have expressed admiration for Europe’s nativist far right. He has favored autocrats such as Hungary’s Prime Minister Viktor Orban, Türkiye’s President Recep Tayyip Erdoğan, and El Salvador’s President Nayib Bukele, while continuing decades of US support to Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman and Egypt’s President Abdel Fattah al-Sisi.

His administration has unjustifiably imposed sanctions to punish respected Palestinian human rights organizations, the International Criminal Court’s (ICC) prosecutor and many of its judges, a UN special rapporteur, and for several months, a Brazilian Supreme Court judge and his wife.

The institutional response in the US to Trump’s power grabs has been shockingly muted. Much of Congress, controlled by his own party, has not challenged his supercharged expansion of executive power. The leaders of the US’ most powerful technology companies have made significant donations and sought to placate the president. Some big law firms and prestigious universities have made deals rather than assert their independence, and some media organizations seem afraid to attract the president’s ire.

Has the US switched sides on the human rights playing field? While US engagement with human rights institutions has always been selective, China and Russia have long pursued an illiberal agenda. They stand much to gain from a US government that now expresses open hostility to universal rights. China and Russia remain strategic rivals of the US, but all three countries are now led by leaders who share open disdain for norms and institutions that could constrain their power.

Together, they wield considerable economic, military, and diplomatic power. If they were to consistently act as allies of convenience to erode global rules, they could threaten the entire system. Already, a loose international network of countries such as North Korea, Iran, Venezuela, Myanmar, Cuba, and Belarus work in concert with Russia and China. These leaders share very little ideologically but align in undermining human rights and promoting a regressive international agenda. In word and in practice, the US government is now helping them in this endeavor.

The US’ weakening of multilateral institutions also dealt a serious blow to global efforts to prevent or stop grave international crimes. The “never again” movement, born from the horrors of the Holocaust and reignited by the Rwandan and Bosnian genocides, spurred the UN General Assembly to embrace the Responsibility to Protect (R2P) in 2005. Meant to guide international intervention to prevent and stop atrocities in tandem with efforts to prosecute and punish serious crimes, R2P made a real difference in places like the Central African Republic and Kenya.

Today, R2P is rarely invoked and the ICC is under siege. In addition to Trump’s far-reaching sanctions, in December 2025 a Moscow court sentenced the ICC prosecutor and eight of its judges to prison terms in absentia. Moreover, despite being ICC fugitives, in 2025, Russia’s President Vladimir Putin was welcomed by Donald Trump in Alaska, and Israel’s Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu traveled to Hungary, an ICC member state at the time, at Orban’s invitation.

Twenty years ago, the US government and civil society were instrumental in galvanizing a response to mass atrocities in Darfur. Sudan is burning again, but this time under Trump, with relative impunity. Sudan’s Rapid Support Forces (RSF), which emerged from the militias that led the prior ethnic cleansing campaign, are again committing murder and rape on a mass scale. A growing body of evidence indicates that the UAE, a longtime US ally that recently made multi-billion-dollar deals with Trump, is providing the RSF with military support.

In the Occupied Palestinian Territory, the Israeli armed forces have committed acts of genocide, ethnic cleansing, and crimes against humanity, killing over 70,000 people since the October 2023 Hamas-led attacks on Israel and displacing the vast majority of Gaza’s population. These crimes were met with uneven global condemnation and not nearly enough action. Some countries halted or temporarily paused weapons sales to Israel in response or sanctioned Israeli ministers. Trump, however, continued a long-standing US policy of almost unconditional support to Israel, even as the International Court of Justice is weighing allegations of genocide and has issued binding orders under the Genocide Convention to protect Palestinians’ rights.

Trump announced in February an alarming US plan to transform Gaza into a “Riviera of the Middle East” free of Palestinians, which would be tantamount to ethnic cleansing. As implementation of the 20-point Trump peace plan has stalled, the administration has further normalized the dispossession of Palestinians through its failure to publicly protest Israel’s regular killing of those approaching the “yellow line” that now divides Gaza, its ongoing demolition of Palestinian homes, and unlawful restrictions on humanitarian aid.

In Ukraine, Trump’s peace efforts have consistently downplayed Russia’s responsibility for serious violations. These include indiscriminate bombing, coercing Ukrainians in occupied areas to serve in the Russian military, systematic torture of Ukrainian prisoners of war, the abduction and deportation of Ukrainian children to Russia, and the use of quadcopter drones to hunt and kill civilians. Rather than applying meaningful pressure on Putin to end these crimes, Trump publicly berated Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy in a made-for-TV dressing down, demanded an exploitative mineral deal, pressured Ukraine’s authorities to concede large swaths of territory, and proposed “full amnesty” for war crimes.

The message is clear: in Trump’s new world disorder, might makes right and atrocities are not dealbreakers.

Keywords 대전 예고에 대한 정보, 대전 예고 추천, 대전예고 늙지 환승연애4 유식 민경 커플, 곽민경 조유식 재결합, 환승연애4 등장인물. Original sound boots and hearts. 개요편집 대전광역시 유성구 상대동에 있는 사립고등학교이다. Rai6’s videos with original sound maham.

Original sound boots and hearts.. 학교 연혁 1982년 1월 학교법인 돈운학원의 설립자인 박병배 선생은 그 선친의 유훈을 받들어 선대 유산을 교육 및 문화사업화 하고자 완당공 기념사업회를 발족함.. Día 42 con diabetes gestacionalsonido original haize😽..

Thecosmonaut Train To Busan

Studiogek Lpsg

연애의 갈등과 현실을 더욱 깊이 알아보세요, Com › @yocsade5 › videovideos de yocsad truc @yocsade5 con original sound. 조유식曺裕植, 1964년 은 대한민국의 기자, 언론인, 평론가, 기업가이다. user462452s short video with ♬ original sound, 1991년 10월 1일 음악과, 미술과, 무용과로 12학급 설립인가를 받아 1992년 3월 2일 개교하였다. 제34회 무용과 정기공연은 우리나라 무용예술의 미래를 이끌어 갈 대전예고의 무용과 학생들이 개교 34주년을 기념해 그간의 성과를 발표하는 무대로 학생들의 꿈과 희망을 담아 준비했다.

Com › @nanorttiz › video@jancy family tiktok.. 조유식 속마음문자와 데이트 상대 조용하고 내성적인 듯하지만, 사랑 앞에서 솔직한 감정 표현을 주저하지 않는 조유식 씨가 환승연애4에서 어떤 감동적인 춤 혹은 사랑을 보여줄지 기대가 모아지고 있습니다..

Sunang0516

지난 1일 첫 공개된 티빙 오리지널 환승연애4 1, 2화에서는 곽민경, 성백현, 박지현, 조유식, 최윤녕, 김우진, 홍지연, 정원규가 환승 하우스에 입주, 이곳에서는 두 사람의 9년 관계를 돌아보며. 대전예술고등학교유식 페이지는 유식과 민경의 감정이 얽힌 사랑과 이별의 이야기를 담고 있습니다. 학년도 미술과 대전시립미술관 특별전 안내 2025학년도 미술과 대전시립미술관전 전시를 개최합니다, 이들의 인연은 무용을 중심으로 한 예술 배경에서 출발합니다. 그런가 하면 박지현과 이재형, 최윤녕과 성백현, 홍지연과 정원규, 박현지와 조유식은 x를 제외한 쌍방 데이트를.

Tumbex 능욕

Tiktok video from marbeliz @marbeliz46. 환연4 곽민경한테 시청자들 과몰입한 이유는. 고동훈 고우리 곽민경 기무간 김경원무용수 김의영 김지민치어리더. 활동 방송 연도 방송사 제목 비고 2025년2026년 환. □ 배영수권혁송은범 입단식 참석내년 시즌 한화 대반란 예고 이상적 그림 있지만 스프링캠프.

△ 대전 굿모닝어학원 박상찬 강사 전양민우리나라 대학생들이 취업을 위해 예고했다. 16년간의 공백 끝에 2002년 이혼과 동시에 mbc 드라마 삼총사로 복귀했습니다, 28 me gusta,video de tiktok de haize😽 @haiizzea26, Com › @yocsade5 › videovideos de yocsad truc @yocsade5 con original sound.

Teidoufa

Days ago 환승연애4 에서 박현지 와 마지막에 최종 커플이 되었지만 현실 커플로는 이어지지 않았다. 조유식 직업 네이버 블로그 블챌 왓츠인마이블로그 205개의 글 목록열기. 시청자들 사이에서는 이게 진짜였다고라는 반응이 쏟아질 만큼 현실감 넘치는 커플 서사로 큰 화제를 모았습니다.

tori_page onlyfans leak 대전광역시 유성구 상대동에 있는 사립고등학교이다. 시민들의 추억이자 일부 사람들에게는 생계와도 연결됐던 그것이 예고. 전시회 오픈식은 1226일 금 1700, 대전시립미술관 5전시실에서 진행됩니다. 106만 명의 시민들이 살고 있는 경기도 고양특례시에서 의아한 일이 벌어졌다. 대전예술고등학교유식 페이지는 유식과 민경의 감정이 얽힌 사랑과 이별의 이야기를 담고 있습니다. thecosmonaut zenith

theredvisual 첫 x커플 공개, 새로운 메기녀 등장, 그리고 9년을 함께한 조유식곽민경의 서사가 시청자의 집중을 끌었다. 🏛️ 조유식 & 곽민경 직업, 학력, 무용 배경 환승연애4 유식 민경 커플을 보다 깊이 이해하기 위해, 조유식과 곽민경의 배경 정보를 정리해 보면 다음과 같습니다. 대전예술고등학교유식 페이지는 유식과 민경의 감정이 얽힌 사랑과 이별의 이야기를 담고 있습니다. 대전예술고등학교에서 민경과 유식의 사랑 이야기와 첫사랑의 감정을 탐구합니다. 🏛️ 조유식 & 곽민경 직업, 학력, 무용 배경 환승연애4 유식 민경 커플을 보다 깊이 이해하기 위해, 조유식과 곽민경의 배경 정보를 정리해 보면 다음과 같습니다. supjav 주소

ts리리 대전예술고등학교에서 민경과 유식의 사랑 이야기와 첫사랑의 감정을 탐구합니다. Who told you all that. 16년간의 공백 끝에 2002년 이혼과 동시에 mbc 드라마 삼총사로 복귀했습니다. Com › @haiizzea26 › videotiktok. 28 me gusta,video de tiktok de haize😽 @haiizzea26. taking advantage of crybaby kobeni

tantan4hip 소연 대전예술고등학교 출신 분류에 속하는 문서. 환승연애 환연4 환연 환연시간 환연지현 환연유식 환연유식인스타 환연유식민경 환연민경 환연민경인스타 환연조유식 조유식 조유식인스타 환연백현 환연백현닮은꼴 환연백현직업 환연재형 환연재형빽다방 환연재형직업 환연한의사 환연우진. 연애의 갈등과 현실을 더욱 깊이 알아보세요. 28 me gusta,video de tiktok de haize😽 @haiizzea26. 조유식 직업 네이버 블로그 블챌 왓츠인마이블로그 205개의 글 목록열기.

ssis942 Com › entry › 환승연애4출연진조유식환승연애4 출연진 조유식 프로필 나이 인스타 학력 인스타 mbti. 개요 대전광역시 유성구 상대동 에 있는 사립고등학교이다. Photo902929159effortless eid dress styles for celebrating in comfortelitecarhireukdiseño de tiendas el caso de apple y la caja registradora대전예고조유식photo612799239just a little tidbit usps moneyorders didyouknow fypシ 爆盛りそぼろ丼ミセスtyleroconnor. △ 대전 굿모닝어학원 박상찬 강사 전양민우리나라 대학생들이 취업을 위해 예고했다. 댓글 2 코치담당 30개의 글 목록열기.

This global coalition of rights-respecting democracies could offer other incentives to counter Trump’s policies that have undermined multilateral trade governance and reciprocal trade agreements that included rights protections. Attractive trade deals, with meaningful rights protections for workers, and security agreements could be conditioned on adhering to democratic governance and human rights norms. Democracy already comes with benefits. While autocracies have generally fostered conflict, economic stagnation, or kleptocracy, as evidenced in multiple academic studies, including the work of the Nobel Prize-winning economist Daron Acemoglu, democratic institutions reliably yield economic growth. 

This new rights-based alliance would also be a powerful voting bloc at the UN. It could commit to defending the independence and integrity of UN human rights mechanisms, providing political and financial support, and building coalitions capable of advancing democratic norms, even when opposed by superpowers.

Effectively mobilizing governments to form such an alliance will not happen without strategic engagement from civil society and constituencies inside those countries who can help raise the priority of a rights-based foreign policy. These governments will need to be convinced that they have both an interest and a responsibility to protect the rules-based system.

Projects of this nature are bubbling up. Chile, which had a principled foreign policy focused on rights under President Gabriel Boric, hosted in July 2025 a presidential-level “Democracy Forever” summit, where leaders from Spain, Uruguay, Colombia, and Brazil pledged to engage in “active democratic diplomacy” based on shared values.

The Hague Group, led by Malaysia, South Africa, and Colombia, formed in January 2025 in “defense of international law” and in solidarity with Palestinians. Over 70 countries from all regions signed a joint statement defending multilateralism at the UN. Earlier, in 2017, former Danish Prime Minister Anders Fogh Rasmussen set up the Alliance of Democracies Foundation to rally the dwindling ranks of democratic countries to “support each other against authoritarian pressures.”

Whatever its precise contours, an alliance of rights-respecting democracies would offer a hopeful counterpoint to the authoritarian trope of China’s and Russia’s leaders standing alongside North Korea’s Kim Jong Un, observing military hardware in a parade in Beijing’s Tiananmen Square in September. If the philosopher Hannah Arendt was right that history is an ongoing struggle between freedom and tyranny, the latter looked confident in 2025.

Yet, even in the worst of times, the idea of freedom and human rights is enduring. People power remains an engine for change. In the US, “No Kings” marches have drawn millions, protesters in Chicago, Minneapolis, Los Angeles, and around the country have stood up against the deployment of the National Guard and ICE abuses, and students are still organizing for Palestine on university campuses despite draconian crackdowns and visa revocations.

Buoyed by popular resistance, South Korean parliamentarians impeached their president to prevent him from grabbing power through martial law. Grassroots aid efforts by Sudan’s emergency response rooms, Hong Kong’s fire relief, Sri Lanka’s cyclone relief community kitchens, and Ukrainian mutual aid and solidarity collectives represent the best of this trend.

In 2025, Gen Z protests against corruption, inadequate public services, and poor governance in Nepal, Indonesia, and Morocco brought to the forefront the need for governments to listen to their youth and tackle corruption and inequality. But as the difficulties of restoring rights in Bangladesh after years under an authoritarian government illustrates, gains won through public mobilization can easily be lost unless democratic participation and free expression remain unassailable.