김성윤 아내 전력분석원이네 ㄷㄷㄷㄷ 야구.

Will Human Rights Survive a Trumpian World?

Authoritarian Advances Threaten Rules-Based Order

The global human rights system is in peril. Under relentless pressure from US President Donald Trump, and persistently undermined by China and Russia, the rules-based international order is being crushed, threatening to take with it the architecture human rights defenders have come to rely on to advance norms and protect freedoms. To defy this trend, governments that still value human rights, alongside social movements, civil society, and international institutions, need to form a strategic alliance to push back.

To be fair, the downward spiral predated Trump’s reelection. The democratic wave that began over 50 years ago has given way to what scholars term a “democratic recession.” Democracy is now back to 1985 levels according to some metrics, with 72 percent of the world’s population now living under autocracy. Russia and China are less free today than 20 years ago. And so is the United States.

Of course, democracy is not a panacea for human rights violations; the US and other longtime democracies have their own histories of colonial crimes, racism, abusive justice systems, and wartime atrocities. More recently, authoritarian leaders have exploited public mistrust and anger to win elections and then dismantled the very institutions that brought them to power. Democratic institutions are crucial to represent the will of the people and keep power in check. It’s no surprise that whenever democracy is undermined, rights are too, as evident in recent years in India, Türkiye, the Philippines, El Salvador, and Hungary.

In this context, 2025 may be seen as a tipping point. In just 12 months, the Trump administration has carried out a broad assault on key pillars of US democracy and the global rules-based order, which the US, despite inconsistencies, was, with other states, instrumental in helping to establish.

In short order, Trump’s second-term administration has undermined trust in the sanctity of elections, reduced government accountability, gutted food assistance and healthcare subsidies, attacked judicial independence, defied court orders, rolled back women’s rights, obstructed access to abortion care, undermined remedies for racial harm, terminated programs mandating accessibility for people with disabilities, punished free speech, stripped protections from trans and intersex people, eroded privacy, and used government power to intimidate political opponents, the media, law firms, universities, civil society, and even comedians.

Claiming a risk of “civilizational erasure” in Europe and leaning on racist tropes to cast entire populations as unwelcome in the US, the Trump administration has embraced policies and rhetoric that align with white nationalist ideology. Immigrants and asylum seekers have been subjected to inhumane conditions and degrading treatment; 32 died in US Immigration and Customs Enforcement custody in 2025, and as of mid-January 2026, an additional 4 have died. Masked immigration enforcement agents have targeted people of color, using excessive force, terrorizing communities, wrongfully arresting scores of citizens, and, most recently, unjustifiably killing two people in Minneapolis, whose deaths Human Rights Watch has documented.

The US president of course has the authority to tighten US borders and enforce stricter immigration policies. The administration is not, however, entitled to deny legal process to asylum seekers, mistreat undocumented migrants, or unlawfully discriminate. In a well-functioning democracy, no electoral mandate should supersede domestic legislation, constitutional protections, or international human rights law. Trump’s team has repeatedly bypassed these guardrails.

The violations have not stopped at the border. The Trump administration used a 1798 law to send hundreds of Venezuelan migrants to an infamous prison in El Salvador, where they were tortured and sexually abused. Its blatantly unlawful strikes on boats in the Caribbean and the Pacific extrajudicially killed more than 120 people whom Trump claims were drug traffickers.

After the US attacked Venezuela and apprehended its president, Nicolás Maduro, and his wife, Cilia Flores, Trump claimed the US would “run” the country and control its vast oil reserves. Despite paying lip service to human rights concerns under Maduro at the United Nations, Trump has worked with the same repressive apparatus to further US interests. Many Western allies have chosen to stay silent about these lawless moves, perhaps fearing erratic tariffs and blowback to their alliances.

Trump’s foreign policy has upended the foundations of the rules-based order that seeks to advance democracy and human rights, even if imperfectly.

Trump has boasted that he doesn’t “need international law” as a constraint, only his “own morality.” His administration has politicized the US State Department’s annual human rights report, stepped away from the global prohibition on antipersonnel landmines, voiced support for rewriting international rules on asylum, and skipped the UN’s Universal Periodic Review of the US’ human rights record.

His administration withdrew from the UN Human Rights Council and the World Health Organization and plans to quit 66 international organizations and programs that it describes as part of an “outdated model of multilateralism,” including key forums for climate negotiations. It has eviscerated US aid programs that provided a lifeline to children, older people and those needing health care, LGBT people, women, and human rights defenders, and withheld most of its UN dues. 

Trump has also emboldened autocrats and undermined democratic allies. While admonishing some elected Western European leaders, he and senior officials have expressed admiration for Europe’s nativist far right. He has favored autocrats such as Hungary’s Prime Minister Viktor Orban, Türkiye’s President Recep Tayyip Erdoğan, and El Salvador’s President Nayib Bukele, while continuing decades of US support to Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman and Egypt’s President Abdel Fattah al-Sisi.

His administration has unjustifiably imposed sanctions to punish respected Palestinian human rights organizations, the International Criminal Court’s (ICC) prosecutor and many of its judges, a UN special rapporteur, and for several months, a Brazilian Supreme Court judge and his wife.

The institutional response in the US to Trump’s power grabs has been shockingly muted. Much of Congress, controlled by his own party, has not challenged his supercharged expansion of executive power. The leaders of the US’ most powerful technology companies have made significant donations and sought to placate the president. Some big law firms and prestigious universities have made deals rather than assert their independence, and some media organizations seem afraid to attract the president’s ire.

Has the US switched sides on the human rights playing field? While US engagement with human rights institutions has always been selective, China and Russia have long pursued an illiberal agenda. They stand much to gain from a US government that now expresses open hostility to universal rights. China and Russia remain strategic rivals of the US, but all three countries are now led by leaders who share open disdain for norms and institutions that could constrain their power.

Together, they wield considerable economic, military, and diplomatic power. If they were to consistently act as allies of convenience to erode global rules, they could threaten the entire system. Already, a loose international network of countries such as North Korea, Iran, Venezuela, Myanmar, Cuba, and Belarus work in concert with Russia and China. These leaders share very little ideologically but align in undermining human rights and promoting a regressive international agenda. In word and in practice, the US government is now helping them in this endeavor.

The US’ weakening of multilateral institutions also dealt a serious blow to global efforts to prevent or stop grave international crimes. The “never again” movement, born from the horrors of the Holocaust and reignited by the Rwandan and Bosnian genocides, spurred the UN General Assembly to embrace the Responsibility to Protect (R2P) in 2005. Meant to guide international intervention to prevent and stop atrocities in tandem with efforts to prosecute and punish serious crimes, R2P made a real difference in places like the Central African Republic and Kenya.

Today, R2P is rarely invoked and the ICC is under siege. In addition to Trump’s far-reaching sanctions, in December 2025 a Moscow court sentenced the ICC prosecutor and eight of its judges to prison terms in absentia. Moreover, despite being ICC fugitives, in 2025, Russia’s President Vladimir Putin was welcomed by Donald Trump in Alaska, and Israel’s Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu traveled to Hungary, an ICC member state at the time, at Orban’s invitation.

Twenty years ago, the US government and civil society were instrumental in galvanizing a response to mass atrocities in Darfur. Sudan is burning again, but this time under Trump, with relative impunity. Sudan’s Rapid Support Forces (RSF), which emerged from the militias that led the prior ethnic cleansing campaign, are again committing murder and rape on a mass scale. A growing body of evidence indicates that the UAE, a longtime US ally that recently made multi-billion-dollar deals with Trump, is providing the RSF with military support.

In the Occupied Palestinian Territory, the Israeli armed forces have committed acts of genocide, ethnic cleansing, and crimes against humanity, killing over 70,000 people since the October 2023 Hamas-led attacks on Israel and displacing the vast majority of Gaza’s population. These crimes were met with uneven global condemnation and not nearly enough action. Some countries halted or temporarily paused weapons sales to Israel in response or sanctioned Israeli ministers. Trump, however, continued a long-standing US policy of almost unconditional support to Israel, even as the International Court of Justice is weighing allegations of genocide and has issued binding orders under the Genocide Convention to protect Palestinians’ rights.

Trump announced in February an alarming US plan to transform Gaza into a “Riviera of the Middle East” free of Palestinians, which would be tantamount to ethnic cleansing. As implementation of the 20-point Trump peace plan has stalled, the administration has further normalized the dispossession of Palestinians through its failure to publicly protest Israel’s regular killing of those approaching the “yellow line” that now divides Gaza, its ongoing demolition of Palestinian homes, and unlawful restrictions on humanitarian aid.

In Ukraine, Trump’s peace efforts have consistently downplayed Russia’s responsibility for serious violations. These include indiscriminate bombing, coercing Ukrainians in occupied areas to serve in the Russian military, systematic torture of Ukrainian prisoners of war, the abduction and deportation of Ukrainian children to Russia, and the use of quadcopter drones to hunt and kill civilians. Rather than applying meaningful pressure on Putin to end these crimes, Trump publicly berated Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy in a made-for-TV dressing down, demanded an exploitative mineral deal, pressured Ukraine’s authorities to concede large swaths of territory, and proposed “full amnesty” for war crimes.

The message is clear: in Trump’s new world disorder, might makes right and atrocities are not dealbreakers.

삼성 라이온즈 소속 외야수 김성윤 의 선수 경력을 모아 놓은 문서. 22 1922 김성윤 결혼 전 연애썰 개웃기네 ㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋ. 이에 김민지는 만두랑 채널 커뮤니티에 자신의 입장문을 올리며 반박했다. 가끔씩 부부의 일상을 올려주는데 서로 잘 챙겨주는 이상적인 결혼 생활 모습에 팬들 사이에서 소소하게 화제가 되고 있다.

2023년 포텐을 터뜨리며 첫 억대 연봉자로 올라섰다 다시 7000만원으로 주저 앉은 김성윤은 살짝 의기소침해 있었다.

아내 생각하는 김성윤에 클로즈업 들어가는 카메라 감독님 인터뷰 2025 kbo리그 25.. 아내 생각하는 김성윤에 클로즈업 들어가는 카메라 감독.. 홈팀 삼성은 원태인이, 방문팀 lg는 에르난데스가 선발 출전했다..

Com › Fireballer_ › 223869248833삼성 김성윤 프로필 봤더니 와이프 정말 대단합니다 네이버 블로그.

Keywords 김성윤 선수 아내의 요리, 삼성라이온즈 김성윤, 유니폼과 밥, 김성윤의 일상, 맛있는 음식 이야기, 프로야구 선수 아내, 삼성라이온즈.

20251203 김성윤선수 토크콘서트 중 결혼을 일찍하게 된 계기.. 학력은 창신초등학교부산진구리틀, 원동중학교, 포항제철고등학교를 졸업했다.. 아마추어 시절 리틀야구단 3개월 후 양산 원.. 김성윤 선수의 아내에 대한 모든 이야기..

김성윤 선수는 1999년 2월 2일 부산광역시 사하구에서 태어난 대한민국의 프로 야구 선수입니다.

삼성 라이온즈 소속 좌투좌타 외야수 김성윤 야구선수에 대해 이번 포스팅을 통해 상세하게 알아보는 시간을 가져보겠습니다. Com › yo39on김성윤 @yo39on instagram photos and videos. 아마추어 시절 리틀야구단 3개월 후 양산 원. 동료 김지찬과 함께 kbo 프로필 기준 163㎝의 최단신 선수로 주목받았던 그의, 홈팀 삼성은 원태인이, 방문팀 lg는 에르난데스가 선발 출전했다. 와이프의 이 한마디로 인해 모든게 시작되었다.

단 1년 만에 조언이 현실로홈런 치면 벌금 지찬이랑. 와이프의 이 한마디로 인해 모든게 시작되었다. 경기 내내 관중석에서 응원을 펼치던 장성호의 부인.

김성윤 선수의 아내에 대한 모든 이야기.

21살 폰판매업하다가 2군야구선수와 결혼30살 여군출신 프리 스포츠아나운서 2군야구선수와결혼사실 박병호 부인이 더 대단하긴, Com › 6145765473김성윤 아내 전력분석원이네 ㄷㄷㄷㄷ 야구 에펨코리아, Com › fireballer_ › 223869248833삼성 김성윤 프로필 봤더니 와이프 정말 대단합니다 네이버 블로그.

@yuna._.y_0802 당연히 모두에게 나눠주는 업무용 번호가 적힌 명함이었지만 본인은 이를 이후에야 깨달았다고 밝혔다. 동료 김지찬과 함께 kbo 프로필 기준 163㎝의 최단신 선수로 주목받았던 그의. 24 sbs sports 572k subscribers subscribe. Days ago 아내가 운영하는 김성윤 일상 계정이 있다. 프로선수임에도 불구하고,해군을 현역으로 병역을 마친 점 20182020,99년생의 젊은 나이에도 일찍 결혼을 한 점,강민호 권혁 황희찬 손준호 를 배출한포항 제철 고등학교 를 졸업한 점입니다. ackuy

ahrin2 nude Com › fireballer_ › 223869248833삼성 김성윤 프로필 봤더니 와이프 정말 대단합니다 네이버 블로그. Keywords 김성윤 선수 아내의 요리, 삼성라이온즈 김성윤, 유니폼과 밥, 김성윤의 일상, 맛있는 음식 이야기, 프로야구 선수 아내, 삼성라이온즈. Com › dugout_mz › 223720293585dugout dream 삼성 라이온즈 김성윤 네이버 블로그. Days ago 아내가 운영하는 김성윤 일상 계정이 있다. 외잼 와이프 첫만남 썰 ㅈㄴ 웃긴거 앎. 5ch 보는법

@beib999 24 sbs sports 572k subscribers subscribe. 22 1922 김성윤 결혼 전 연애썰 개웃기네 ㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋ. 아내한테 대표팀 발탁 소식을 맨 먼저 이야기했더니 축하해줬다. 라이온즈 대표 사랑꾼으로서 연애 스토리를 하나 들려줄 수 있어요. 아내 생각하는 김성윤에 클로즈업 들어가는 카메라 감독님 인터뷰 2025 kbo리그 25. ahoo eporn

@dianzinvyou888 대한민국 국적을 가지며, 학력은 창신초부산진구리틀에서 시작하여 원동중을 거쳐 포항제철고를 졸업했다. 김성윤 아내 전력분석원이네 ㄷㄷㄷㄷ 야구. Keywords 김성윤 선수 아내의 요리, 삼성라이온즈 김성윤, 유니폼과 밥, 김성윤의 일상, 맛있는 음식 이야기, 프로야구 선수 아내, 삼성라이온즈. 당연히 모두에게 나눠주는 업무용 번호가 적힌 명함이었지만 본인은 이를 이후에야 깨달았다고 밝혔다. 대한민국 국적을 가지며, 학력은 창신초부산진구리틀에서 시작하여 원동중을 거쳐 포항제철고를 졸업했다.

ai 오나사포 2025년 만 나이 기준으로 26세의 나이가 되었습니다. 김진성 선수 아내, 선수정보윤, 김성윤 아내 사진, 축구선수 이재성 아내. 와이프의 서포터와 김성윤 선수의 끊임없는 의지에 힘입어 드디어. Dugout dream 삼성 라이온즈 김성윤. 김성윤 아내 전력분석원이네 ㄷㄷㄷㄷ 야구.

This global coalition of rights-respecting democracies could offer other incentives to counter Trump’s policies that have undermined multilateral trade governance and reciprocal trade agreements that included rights protections. Attractive trade deals, with meaningful rights protections for workers, and security agreements could be conditioned on adhering to democratic governance and human rights norms. Democracy already comes with benefits. While autocracies have generally fostered conflict, economic stagnation, or kleptocracy, as evidenced in multiple academic studies, including the work of the Nobel Prize-winning economist Daron Acemoglu, democratic institutions reliably yield economic growth. 

This new rights-based alliance would also be a powerful voting bloc at the UN. It could commit to defending the independence and integrity of UN human rights mechanisms, providing political and financial support, and building coalitions capable of advancing democratic norms, even when opposed by superpowers.

Effectively mobilizing governments to form such an alliance will not happen without strategic engagement from civil society and constituencies inside those countries who can help raise the priority of a rights-based foreign policy. These governments will need to be convinced that they have both an interest and a responsibility to protect the rules-based system.

Projects of this nature are bubbling up. Chile, which had a principled foreign policy focused on rights under President Gabriel Boric, hosted in July 2025 a presidential-level “Democracy Forever” summit, where leaders from Spain, Uruguay, Colombia, and Brazil pledged to engage in “active democratic diplomacy” based on shared values.

The Hague Group, led by Malaysia, South Africa, and Colombia, formed in January 2025 in “defense of international law” and in solidarity with Palestinians. Over 70 countries from all regions signed a joint statement defending multilateralism at the UN. Earlier, in 2017, former Danish Prime Minister Anders Fogh Rasmussen set up the Alliance of Democracies Foundation to rally the dwindling ranks of democratic countries to “support each other against authoritarian pressures.”

Whatever its precise contours, an alliance of rights-respecting democracies would offer a hopeful counterpoint to the authoritarian trope of China’s and Russia’s leaders standing alongside North Korea’s Kim Jong Un, observing military hardware in a parade in Beijing’s Tiananmen Square in September. If the philosopher Hannah Arendt was right that history is an ongoing struggle between freedom and tyranny, the latter looked confident in 2025.

Yet, even in the worst of times, the idea of freedom and human rights is enduring. People power remains an engine for change. In the US, “No Kings” marches have drawn millions, protesters in Chicago, Minneapolis, Los Angeles, and around the country have stood up against the deployment of the National Guard and ICE abuses, and students are still organizing for Palestine on university campuses despite draconian crackdowns and visa revocations.

Buoyed by popular resistance, South Korean parliamentarians impeached their president to prevent him from grabbing power through martial law. Grassroots aid efforts by Sudan’s emergency response rooms, Hong Kong’s fire relief, Sri Lanka’s cyclone relief community kitchens, and Ukrainian mutual aid and solidarity collectives represent the best of this trend.

In 2025, Gen Z protests against corruption, inadequate public services, and poor governance in Nepal, Indonesia, and Morocco brought to the forefront the need for governments to listen to their youth and tackle corruption and inequality. But as the difficulties of restoring rights in Bangladesh after years under an authoritarian government illustrates, gains won through public mobilization can easily be lost unless democratic participation and free expression remain unassailable.