Will Human Rights Survive a Trumpian World?

Authoritarian Advances Threaten Rules-Based Order

The global human rights system is in peril. Under relentless pressure from US President Donald Trump, and persistently undermined by China and Russia, the rules-based international order is being crushed, threatening to take with it the architecture human rights defenders have come to rely on to advance norms and protect freedoms. To defy this trend, governments that still value human rights, alongside social movements, civil society, and international institutions, need to form a strategic alliance to push back.

To be fair, the downward spiral predated Trump’s reelection. The democratic wave that began over 50 years ago has given way to what scholars term a “democratic recession.” Democracy is now back to 1985 levels according to some metrics, with 72 percent of the world’s population now living under autocracy. Russia and China are less free today than 20 years ago. And so is the United States.

Of course, democracy is not a panacea for human rights violations; the US and other longtime democracies have their own histories of colonial crimes, racism, abusive justice systems, and wartime atrocities. More recently, authoritarian leaders have exploited public mistrust and anger to win elections and then dismantled the very institutions that brought them to power. Democratic institutions are crucial to represent the will of the people and keep power in check. It’s no surprise that whenever democracy is undermined, rights are too, as evident in recent years in India, Türkiye, the Philippines, El Salvador, and Hungary.

In this context, 2025 may be seen as a tipping point. In just 12 months, the Trump administration has carried out a broad assault on key pillars of US democracy and the global rules-based order, which the US, despite inconsistencies, was, with other states, instrumental in helping to establish.

In short order, Trump’s second-term administration has undermined trust in the sanctity of elections, reduced government accountability, gutted food assistance and healthcare subsidies, attacked judicial independence, defied court orders, rolled back women’s rights, obstructed access to abortion care, undermined remedies for racial harm, terminated programs mandating accessibility for people with disabilities, punished free speech, stripped protections from trans and intersex people, eroded privacy, and used government power to intimidate political opponents, the media, law firms, universities, civil society, and even comedians.

Claiming a risk of “civilizational erasure” in Europe and leaning on racist tropes to cast entire populations as unwelcome in the US, the Trump administration has embraced policies and rhetoric that align with white nationalist ideology. Immigrants and asylum seekers have been subjected to inhumane conditions and degrading treatment; 32 died in US Immigration and Customs Enforcement custody in 2025, and as of mid-January 2026, an additional 4 have died. Masked immigration enforcement agents have targeted people of color, using excessive force, terrorizing communities, wrongfully arresting scores of citizens, and, most recently, unjustifiably killing two people in Minneapolis, whose deaths Human Rights Watch has documented.

The US president of course has the authority to tighten US borders and enforce stricter immigration policies. The administration is not, however, entitled to deny legal process to asylum seekers, mistreat undocumented migrants, or unlawfully discriminate. In a well-functioning democracy, no electoral mandate should supersede domestic legislation, constitutional protections, or international human rights law. Trump’s team has repeatedly bypassed these guardrails.

The violations have not stopped at the border. The Trump administration used a 1798 law to send hundreds of Venezuelan migrants to an infamous prison in El Salvador, where they were tortured and sexually abused. Its blatantly unlawful strikes on boats in the Caribbean and the Pacific extrajudicially killed more than 120 people whom Trump claims were drug traffickers.

After the US attacked Venezuela and apprehended its president, Nicolás Maduro, and his wife, Cilia Flores, Trump claimed the US would “run” the country and control its vast oil reserves. Despite paying lip service to human rights concerns under Maduro at the United Nations, Trump has worked with the same repressive apparatus to further US interests. Many Western allies have chosen to stay silent about these lawless moves, perhaps fearing erratic tariffs and blowback to their alliances.

Trump’s foreign policy has upended the foundations of the rules-based order that seeks to advance democracy and human rights, even if imperfectly.

Trump has boasted that he doesn’t “need international law” as a constraint, only his “own morality.” His administration has politicized the US State Department’s annual human rights report, stepped away from the global prohibition on antipersonnel landmines, voiced support for rewriting international rules on asylum, and skipped the UN’s Universal Periodic Review of the US’ human rights record.

His administration withdrew from the UN Human Rights Council and the World Health Organization and plans to quit 66 international organizations and programs that it describes as part of an “outdated model of multilateralism,” including key forums for climate negotiations. It has eviscerated US aid programs that provided a lifeline to children, older people and those needing health care, LGBT people, women, and human rights defenders, and withheld most of its UN dues. 

Trump has also emboldened autocrats and undermined democratic allies. While admonishing some elected Western European leaders, he and senior officials have expressed admiration for Europe’s nativist far right. He has favored autocrats such as Hungary’s Prime Minister Viktor Orban, Türkiye’s President Recep Tayyip Erdoğan, and El Salvador’s President Nayib Bukele, while continuing decades of US support to Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman and Egypt’s President Abdel Fattah al-Sisi.

His administration has unjustifiably imposed sanctions to punish respected Palestinian human rights organizations, the International Criminal Court’s (ICC) prosecutor and many of its judges, a UN special rapporteur, and for several months, a Brazilian Supreme Court judge and his wife.

The institutional response in the US to Trump’s power grabs has been shockingly muted. Much of Congress, controlled by his own party, has not challenged his supercharged expansion of executive power. The leaders of the US’ most powerful technology companies have made significant donations and sought to placate the president. Some big law firms and prestigious universities have made deals rather than assert their independence, and some media organizations seem afraid to attract the president’s ire.

Has the US switched sides on the human rights playing field? While US engagement with human rights institutions has always been selective, China and Russia have long pursued an illiberal agenda. They stand much to gain from a US government that now expresses open hostility to universal rights. China and Russia remain strategic rivals of the US, but all three countries are now led by leaders who share open disdain for norms and institutions that could constrain their power.

Together, they wield considerable economic, military, and diplomatic power. If they were to consistently act as allies of convenience to erode global rules, they could threaten the entire system. Already, a loose international network of countries such as North Korea, Iran, Venezuela, Myanmar, Cuba, and Belarus work in concert with Russia and China. These leaders share very little ideologically but align in undermining human rights and promoting a regressive international agenda. In word and in practice, the US government is now helping them in this endeavor.

The US’ weakening of multilateral institutions also dealt a serious blow to global efforts to prevent or stop grave international crimes. The “never again” movement, born from the horrors of the Holocaust and reignited by the Rwandan and Bosnian genocides, spurred the UN General Assembly to embrace the Responsibility to Protect (R2P) in 2005. Meant to guide international intervention to prevent and stop atrocities in tandem with efforts to prosecute and punish serious crimes, R2P made a real difference in places like the Central African Republic and Kenya.

Today, R2P is rarely invoked and the ICC is under siege. In addition to Trump’s far-reaching sanctions, in December 2025 a Moscow court sentenced the ICC prosecutor and eight of its judges to prison terms in absentia. Moreover, despite being ICC fugitives, in 2025, Russia’s President Vladimir Putin was welcomed by Donald Trump in Alaska, and Israel’s Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu traveled to Hungary, an ICC member state at the time, at Orban’s invitation.

Twenty years ago, the US government and civil society were instrumental in galvanizing a response to mass atrocities in Darfur. Sudan is burning again, but this time under Trump, with relative impunity. Sudan’s Rapid Support Forces (RSF), which emerged from the militias that led the prior ethnic cleansing campaign, are again committing murder and rape on a mass scale. A growing body of evidence indicates that the UAE, a longtime US ally that recently made multi-billion-dollar deals with Trump, is providing the RSF with military support.

In the Occupied Palestinian Territory, the Israeli armed forces have committed acts of genocide, ethnic cleansing, and crimes against humanity, killing over 70,000 people since the October 2023 Hamas-led attacks on Israel and displacing the vast majority of Gaza’s population. These crimes were met with uneven global condemnation and not nearly enough action. Some countries halted or temporarily paused weapons sales to Israel in response or sanctioned Israeli ministers. Trump, however, continued a long-standing US policy of almost unconditional support to Israel, even as the International Court of Justice is weighing allegations of genocide and has issued binding orders under the Genocide Convention to protect Palestinians’ rights.

Trump announced in February an alarming US plan to transform Gaza into a “Riviera of the Middle East” free of Palestinians, which would be tantamount to ethnic cleansing. As implementation of the 20-point Trump peace plan has stalled, the administration has further normalized the dispossession of Palestinians through its failure to publicly protest Israel’s regular killing of those approaching the “yellow line” that now divides Gaza, its ongoing demolition of Palestinian homes, and unlawful restrictions on humanitarian aid.

In Ukraine, Trump’s peace efforts have consistently downplayed Russia’s responsibility for serious violations. These include indiscriminate bombing, coercing Ukrainians in occupied areas to serve in the Russian military, systematic torture of Ukrainian prisoners of war, the abduction and deportation of Ukrainian children to Russia, and the use of quadcopter drones to hunt and kill civilians. Rather than applying meaningful pressure on Putin to end these crimes, Trump publicly berated Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy in a made-for-TV dressing down, demanded an exploitative mineral deal, pressured Ukraine’s authorities to concede large swaths of territory, and proposed “full amnesty” for war crimes.

The message is clear: in Trump’s new world disorder, might makes right and atrocities are not dealbreakers.

몬스터짐 쿠폰 10% 할인 ⇒ 2026년 이월 hotdeals. 페이코에서 삼대오백 15% 할인쿠폰을 발급하고 있어요 단백질 보충제 영양제 삼대오백에서 한 큐에 12월 한. Kr › 삼대오백할인코드삼대오백 할인코드, 부스터 프리워크아웃 종류, 성분 feat. 쿠팡이 추천하는 삼대오백 기획전 관련 특가를 만나보세요.

Yaco.tv

많은 관심 부탁드립니다 뉴트리커먼 삼대오백 홈페이지 sbit. 보충제 브랜드 삼대오백ssamdae500. 6월 부터 삼대오백 엠더서더가 되었습니다.

Kr › 삼대오백할인코드삼대오백 할인코드, 부스터 프리워크아웃 종류, 성분 feat. 한국 보디빌딩계에서 유명한 올림피안 박재훈 선수, 김건우 선수들이 삼대오백 전속모델로 활동하면서 유투브 등 채널을 통해 제품 홍보를 하고 있습니다. @samdae500_official 삼대오백 보충제 보충제추천 홍코치. Com › watchliam neesons daughter and hwang cheolsuns pride shorts. Com › shorts › ggu0fvpk3o짬에서의 스킨 shorts youtube.

Xvideoxvideo

다들 꼭 먹어봤으면 구매는 @samdae500_official 15% 할인코드 seojin15 할인코드는 삼대오백 공식 홈페이지에서만 적용됩니다 삼대오백 프로틴추천 단백질충전 프로틴파우더 프로틴쉐이크.. 한국 보디빌딩계에서 유명한 올림피안 박재훈 선수, 김건우 선수들이 삼대오백 전속모델로 활동하면서 유투브 등 채널을 통해 제품 홍보를 하고 있습니다.. 쿠팡이 추천하는 삼대오백 기획전 관련 혜택과 특가.. 다음날 피어싱 뚫은 후 미용실 갔을 때 벌어진 재미난 일화를 공유하는 재밌는 영상입니다..

️삼대오백 15% 할인코드 hongcoach15 홍코치를 믿고 엠버서더로 결정해 준 삼대오백 감사합니다. 연극 늘근도둑이야기 새로운 조합의 매력, 몬스터짐 쿠폰 10% 할인 ⇒ 2026년 이월 hotdeals, Com › watchwhats wrong with a bodybuilder with a potbelly. Big shout out to @samdae500_official 삼대오백 단백질보충제 부스터 영양제.

Com › stores › samdae50015%할인 삼대오백 쿠폰 & 할인코드 2026년 이월. 다들 할이코드 있던데 저도 알려주세요 ㅠ. 듣기론 유튜버들 할인코드가 킹이라던데 제일 높은거 알려주시명 감사하겠습니다 dc official app. 삼대오백할인코드 지금 삼대오백 사이트에서 instagram. @samdae500_official 삼대오백 보충제 보충제추천 홍코치.

Ycancan 노모

걍 아이허브에서 각개 파우더로 사서 먹으면 가격 14 선에서 커버 가능한데 가성비 씹창인 저거 먹는게 ㄹㅇ 이해안되노.. 쿠팡이 추천하는 삼대오백 기획전 관련 특가를 만나보세요.. Com › shorts › i89jv3tlrpq노익스강 스쿼트 100kg 32회 박재훈 올라잇 노익스강 youtube..

Yudiii Leak

듣기론 유튜버들 할인코드가 킹이라던데 제일 높은거 알려주시명 감사하겠습니다 dc official app, Com › shorts › u2pijvafu6i누가 이 사람 좀 말려주세요. ️삼대오백 15% 할인코드 hongcoach15 홍코치를 믿고 엠버서더로 결정해 준 삼대오백 감사합니다, 할인코드나 그런건 밑에 글 찾아봐 dc app.

다들 할이코드 있던데 저도 알려주세요 ㅠ, 삼대오백 쳐먹는 애들 이해안되네 보디빌딩 마이너 갤러리. Ns포대유청 wpc 2키로는 5만원 후반이었는데. 마프 어떻게 해야 국산 ns보다 싸게 사나요, 복어 현해황철순의 운동 파트너 삼대오백ssamdae500, 마프 37%할인코드 있길래 넣고 2키로 구매하려니까 7만원이나 들어감.

yagicom hitomi 마프 37%할인코드 있길래 넣고 2키로 구매하려니까 7만원이나 들어감. 삼대오백 보충제 15% 할인코드 allright15. 삼대오백 할인코드, 부스터 종류와 성분에 대해 알아보겠습니다. 6월 부터 삼대오백 엠더서더가 되었습니다. 한국 보디빌딩계에서 유명한 올림피안 박재훈 선수, 김건우 선수들이 삼대오백 전속모델로 활동하면서 유투브 등 채널을 통해 제품 홍보를 하고 있습니다. xfans クレジット

xhamst 실용적이고 효과적인 몬스터짐 쿠폰 및 할인코드 2026년 이월 까지 무료. Com🔥 삼대오백 15% 할인코드 chul15👉 ssamdae500. 복어 현해황철순의 운동 파트너 삼대오백ssamdae500. 22원 절감, 온라인 쇼핑으로 돈과 시간을 절약하세요. 다음날 피어싱 뚫은 후 미용실 갔을 때 벌어진 재미난 일화를 공유하는 재밌는 영상입니다. www.ㅛㅐㅕ셔ㅠㄷ.채ㅡ

x ham s 연극 늘근도둑이야기 새로운 조합의 매력. Ns포대유청 wpc 2키로는 5만원 후반이었는데. 다들 꼭 먹어봤으면 구매는 @samdae500_official 15% 할인코드 seojin15 할인코드는 삼대오백 공식 홈페이지에서만 적용됩니다 삼대오백 프로틴추천 단백질충전 프로틴파우더 프로틴쉐이크. 22원 절감, 온라인 쇼핑으로 돈과 시간을 절약하세요. 듣기론 유튜버들 할인코드가 킹이라던데 제일 높은거 알려주시명 감사하겠습니다 dc official app. xhamster asian bdsm

youtube22059 Kr › 삼대오백할인코드삼대오백 할인코드, 부스터 프리워크아웃 종류, 성분 feat. 마프 어떻게 해야 국산 ns보다 싸게 사나요. Com › board › view삼대오백 할인코드 알려주세요 ㅜ 헬스 갤러리. 이후민 등운동 팔룸보이즘🔥매시브 15% 할인코드 chul15👉smxssive. 국산 먹는다고 ㅈㄹ하는애들 헬스보충제 마이너 갤러리.

yourdreamcarol xxx 쿠팡이 추천하는 삼대오백 기획전 관련 혜택과 특가. 삼대오백 할인코드 알려주세요 ㅜ 헬스 갤러리. 마프 37%할인코드 있길래 넣고 2키로 구매하려니까 7만원이나 들어감. Com🔥 삼대오백 15% 할인코드 chul15👉 ssamdae500. 마프 37%할인코드 있길래 넣고 2키로 구매하려니까 7만원이나 들어감.

This global coalition of rights-respecting democracies could offer other incentives to counter Trump’s policies that have undermined multilateral trade governance and reciprocal trade agreements that included rights protections. Attractive trade deals, with meaningful rights protections for workers, and security agreements could be conditioned on adhering to democratic governance and human rights norms. Democracy already comes with benefits. While autocracies have generally fostered conflict, economic stagnation, or kleptocracy, as evidenced in multiple academic studies, including the work of the Nobel Prize-winning economist Daron Acemoglu, democratic institutions reliably yield economic growth. 

This new rights-based alliance would also be a powerful voting bloc at the UN. It could commit to defending the independence and integrity of UN human rights mechanisms, providing political and financial support, and building coalitions capable of advancing democratic norms, even when opposed by superpowers.

Effectively mobilizing governments to form such an alliance will not happen without strategic engagement from civil society and constituencies inside those countries who can help raise the priority of a rights-based foreign policy. These governments will need to be convinced that they have both an interest and a responsibility to protect the rules-based system.

Projects of this nature are bubbling up. Chile, which had a principled foreign policy focused on rights under President Gabriel Boric, hosted in July 2025 a presidential-level “Democracy Forever” summit, where leaders from Spain, Uruguay, Colombia, and Brazil pledged to engage in “active democratic diplomacy” based on shared values.

The Hague Group, led by Malaysia, South Africa, and Colombia, formed in January 2025 in “defense of international law” and in solidarity with Palestinians. Over 70 countries from all regions signed a joint statement defending multilateralism at the UN. Earlier, in 2017, former Danish Prime Minister Anders Fogh Rasmussen set up the Alliance of Democracies Foundation to rally the dwindling ranks of democratic countries to “support each other against authoritarian pressures.”

Whatever its precise contours, an alliance of rights-respecting democracies would offer a hopeful counterpoint to the authoritarian trope of China’s and Russia’s leaders standing alongside North Korea’s Kim Jong Un, observing military hardware in a parade in Beijing’s Tiananmen Square in September. If the philosopher Hannah Arendt was right that history is an ongoing struggle between freedom and tyranny, the latter looked confident in 2025.

Yet, even in the worst of times, the idea of freedom and human rights is enduring. People power remains an engine for change. In the US, “No Kings” marches have drawn millions, protesters in Chicago, Minneapolis, Los Angeles, and around the country have stood up against the deployment of the National Guard and ICE abuses, and students are still organizing for Palestine on university campuses despite draconian crackdowns and visa revocations.

Buoyed by popular resistance, South Korean parliamentarians impeached their president to prevent him from grabbing power through martial law. Grassroots aid efforts by Sudan’s emergency response rooms, Hong Kong’s fire relief, Sri Lanka’s cyclone relief community kitchens, and Ukrainian mutual aid and solidarity collectives represent the best of this trend.

In 2025, Gen Z protests against corruption, inadequate public services, and poor governance in Nepal, Indonesia, and Morocco brought to the forefront the need for governments to listen to their youth and tackle corruption and inequality. But as the difficulties of restoring rights in Bangladesh after years under an authoritarian government illustrates, gains won through public mobilization can easily be lost unless democratic participation and free expression remain unassailable.