Will Human Rights Survive a Trumpian World?

Authoritarian Advances Threaten Rules-Based Order

The global human rights system is in peril. Under relentless pressure from US President Donald Trump, and persistently undermined by China and Russia, the rules-based international order is being crushed, threatening to take with it the architecture human rights defenders have come to rely on to advance norms and protect freedoms. To defy this trend, governments that still value human rights, alongside social movements, civil society, and international institutions, need to form a strategic alliance to push back.

To be fair, the downward spiral predated Trump’s reelection. The democratic wave that began over 50 years ago has given way to what scholars term a “democratic recession.” Democracy is now back to 1985 levels according to some metrics, with 72 percent of the world’s population now living under autocracy. Russia and China are less free today than 20 years ago. And so is the United States.

Of course, democracy is not a panacea for human rights violations; the US and other longtime democracies have their own histories of colonial crimes, racism, abusive justice systems, and wartime atrocities. More recently, authoritarian leaders have exploited public mistrust and anger to win elections and then dismantled the very institutions that brought them to power. Democratic institutions are crucial to represent the will of the people and keep power in check. It’s no surprise that whenever democracy is undermined, rights are too, as evident in recent years in India, Türkiye, the Philippines, El Salvador, and Hungary.

In this context, 2025 may be seen as a tipping point. In just 12 months, the Trump administration has carried out a broad assault on key pillars of US democracy and the global rules-based order, which the US, despite inconsistencies, was, with other states, instrumental in helping to establish.

In short order, Trump’s second-term administration has undermined trust in the sanctity of elections, reduced government accountability, gutted food assistance and healthcare subsidies, attacked judicial independence, defied court orders, rolled back women’s rights, obstructed access to abortion care, undermined remedies for racial harm, terminated programs mandating accessibility for people with disabilities, punished free speech, stripped protections from trans and intersex people, eroded privacy, and used government power to intimidate political opponents, the media, law firms, universities, civil society, and even comedians.

Claiming a risk of “civilizational erasure” in Europe and leaning on racist tropes to cast entire populations as unwelcome in the US, the Trump administration has embraced policies and rhetoric that align with white nationalist ideology. Immigrants and asylum seekers have been subjected to inhumane conditions and degrading treatment; 32 died in US Immigration and Customs Enforcement custody in 2025, and as of mid-January 2026, an additional 4 have died. Masked immigration enforcement agents have targeted people of color, using excessive force, terrorizing communities, wrongfully arresting scores of citizens, and, most recently, unjustifiably killing two people in Minneapolis, whose deaths Human Rights Watch has documented.

The US president of course has the authority to tighten US borders and enforce stricter immigration policies. The administration is not, however, entitled to deny legal process to asylum seekers, mistreat undocumented migrants, or unlawfully discriminate. In a well-functioning democracy, no electoral mandate should supersede domestic legislation, constitutional protections, or international human rights law. Trump’s team has repeatedly bypassed these guardrails.

The violations have not stopped at the border. The Trump administration used a 1798 law to send hundreds of Venezuelan migrants to an infamous prison in El Salvador, where they were tortured and sexually abused. Its blatantly unlawful strikes on boats in the Caribbean and the Pacific extrajudicially killed more than 120 people whom Trump claims were drug traffickers.

After the US attacked Venezuela and apprehended its president, Nicolás Maduro, and his wife, Cilia Flores, Trump claimed the US would “run” the country and control its vast oil reserves. Despite paying lip service to human rights concerns under Maduro at the United Nations, Trump has worked with the same repressive apparatus to further US interests. Many Western allies have chosen to stay silent about these lawless moves, perhaps fearing erratic tariffs and blowback to their alliances.

Trump’s foreign policy has upended the foundations of the rules-based order that seeks to advance democracy and human rights, even if imperfectly.

Trump has boasted that he doesn’t “need international law” as a constraint, only his “own morality.” His administration has politicized the US State Department’s annual human rights report, stepped away from the global prohibition on antipersonnel landmines, voiced support for rewriting international rules on asylum, and skipped the UN’s Universal Periodic Review of the US’ human rights record.

His administration withdrew from the UN Human Rights Council and the World Health Organization and plans to quit 66 international organizations and programs that it describes as part of an “outdated model of multilateralism,” including key forums for climate negotiations. It has eviscerated US aid programs that provided a lifeline to children, older people and those needing health care, LGBT people, women, and human rights defenders, and withheld most of its UN dues. 

Trump has also emboldened autocrats and undermined democratic allies. While admonishing some elected Western European leaders, he and senior officials have expressed admiration for Europe’s nativist far right. He has favored autocrats such as Hungary’s Prime Minister Viktor Orban, Türkiye’s President Recep Tayyip Erdoğan, and El Salvador’s President Nayib Bukele, while continuing decades of US support to Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman and Egypt’s President Abdel Fattah al-Sisi.

His administration has unjustifiably imposed sanctions to punish respected Palestinian human rights organizations, the International Criminal Court’s (ICC) prosecutor and many of its judges, a UN special rapporteur, and for several months, a Brazilian Supreme Court judge and his wife.

The institutional response in the US to Trump’s power grabs has been shockingly muted. Much of Congress, controlled by his own party, has not challenged his supercharged expansion of executive power. The leaders of the US’ most powerful technology companies have made significant donations and sought to placate the president. Some big law firms and prestigious universities have made deals rather than assert their independence, and some media organizations seem afraid to attract the president’s ire.

Has the US switched sides on the human rights playing field? While US engagement with human rights institutions has always been selective, China and Russia have long pursued an illiberal agenda. They stand much to gain from a US government that now expresses open hostility to universal rights. China and Russia remain strategic rivals of the US, but all three countries are now led by leaders who share open disdain for norms and institutions that could constrain their power.

Together, they wield considerable economic, military, and diplomatic power. If they were to consistently act as allies of convenience to erode global rules, they could threaten the entire system. Already, a loose international network of countries such as North Korea, Iran, Venezuela, Myanmar, Cuba, and Belarus work in concert with Russia and China. These leaders share very little ideologically but align in undermining human rights and promoting a regressive international agenda. In word and in practice, the US government is now helping them in this endeavor.

The US’ weakening of multilateral institutions also dealt a serious blow to global efforts to prevent or stop grave international crimes. The “never again” movement, born from the horrors of the Holocaust and reignited by the Rwandan and Bosnian genocides, spurred the UN General Assembly to embrace the Responsibility to Protect (R2P) in 2005. Meant to guide international intervention to prevent and stop atrocities in tandem with efforts to prosecute and punish serious crimes, R2P made a real difference in places like the Central African Republic and Kenya.

Today, R2P is rarely invoked and the ICC is under siege. In addition to Trump’s far-reaching sanctions, in December 2025 a Moscow court sentenced the ICC prosecutor and eight of its judges to prison terms in absentia. Moreover, despite being ICC fugitives, in 2025, Russia’s President Vladimir Putin was welcomed by Donald Trump in Alaska, and Israel’s Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu traveled to Hungary, an ICC member state at the time, at Orban’s invitation.

Twenty years ago, the US government and civil society were instrumental in galvanizing a response to mass atrocities in Darfur. Sudan is burning again, but this time under Trump, with relative impunity. Sudan’s Rapid Support Forces (RSF), which emerged from the militias that led the prior ethnic cleansing campaign, are again committing murder and rape on a mass scale. A growing body of evidence indicates that the UAE, a longtime US ally that recently made multi-billion-dollar deals with Trump, is providing the RSF with military support.

In the Occupied Palestinian Territory, the Israeli armed forces have committed acts of genocide, ethnic cleansing, and crimes against humanity, killing over 70,000 people since the October 2023 Hamas-led attacks on Israel and displacing the vast majority of Gaza’s population. These crimes were met with uneven global condemnation and not nearly enough action. Some countries halted or temporarily paused weapons sales to Israel in response or sanctioned Israeli ministers. Trump, however, continued a long-standing US policy of almost unconditional support to Israel, even as the International Court of Justice is weighing allegations of genocide and has issued binding orders under the Genocide Convention to protect Palestinians’ rights.

Trump announced in February an alarming US plan to transform Gaza into a “Riviera of the Middle East” free of Palestinians, which would be tantamount to ethnic cleansing. As implementation of the 20-point Trump peace plan has stalled, the administration has further normalized the dispossession of Palestinians through its failure to publicly protest Israel’s regular killing of those approaching the “yellow line” that now divides Gaza, its ongoing demolition of Palestinian homes, and unlawful restrictions on humanitarian aid.

In Ukraine, Trump’s peace efforts have consistently downplayed Russia’s responsibility for serious violations. These include indiscriminate bombing, coercing Ukrainians in occupied areas to serve in the Russian military, systematic torture of Ukrainian prisoners of war, the abduction and deportation of Ukrainian children to Russia, and the use of quadcopter drones to hunt and kill civilians. Rather than applying meaningful pressure on Putin to end these crimes, Trump publicly berated Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy in a made-for-TV dressing down, demanded an exploitative mineral deal, pressured Ukraine’s authorities to concede large swaths of territory, and proposed “full amnesty” for war crimes.

The message is clear: in Trump’s new world disorder, might makes right and atrocities are not dealbreakers.

Com › qna › dirs세종대왕유튜브프리미엄 없어졌나요 네이버 지식in. ㅠㅠ 옛날에 세종대왕 썼었는데 가격도 비싸지도 사기라는 말 좀 있어서 쓰기 싫네. Com › qna › dirs세종대왕유튜브프리미엄 없어졌나요 네이버 지식in. 가족 결합으로 쓰고 있는데 다시 결제 하려고 연락해봤는데 답장이 없네요 1년 지나면 자동으로 해지되나요.

Alain Mypikpak

세종대왕 유튜브 프리미엄사기🚨 네이버 블로그 photolog 5개의 글 목록열기.. 그 세종대왕 프리미엄 쓰는사람들있냐 유튜브 마이너 갤러리.. Com › mgallery › board그 세종대왕 프리미엄 쓰는사람들있냐 유튜브 마이너 갤러리..

프리미엄을 해지해도 계정이 정지되지는 않습니다. Com › tjgk5959 › 223898505310⚠️유튜브 프리미엄 세종대왕 후기 ️내⭐️돈⭐️내⭐️산 ️⚠️ 네이버 블로. 구글은 통신사도못건들여서 망사용료 0원임 근데 국민소득 9만달러노르웨이보다 비쌈 dc official app.

최다회원최다후기최장운영 1위 에서 안전하게 이용하시길 바랍니다, 개인충전형 쓸려고했는데 이번에 마지막으로 가족함더 써본다. 몇 달 전까지만 해도 잘 사용하던 세종대왕 유튜브 프리미엄이 어느 날 갑자기 작동을 멈췄습니다. 유튜브프리미엄 세종대왕 그립노 갤러리 디시인사이드, 세종대왕프리미엄이랑 구독친구 쓰는사람 유튜브 마이너.

길이 170m,경하 톤수 8,200톤,최대 30노트약 55kmh로 항해가 가능하며,세종대왕급7,600톤급 이지스함 대비 크게 향상된이지스전투체계와통합소나체계가 적용, 얘네 사이트 날라갔던데 머 어케되는거임 참고로 나도 곧 있으면 기간 채우는데 그냥 불이익 없이 유지 되는거임. 카카오플러스에서 사업자를내고 운영중인거같았고 친구도 1년이상 유튜브프리미엄 세종대왕 채널을 이용했기에 믿고한번 해봤는데요. 현지카드 쓰는 그런 믿을만한 업체 없음. Com › qna › dirs세종대왕유튜브프리미엄 없어졌나요 네이버 지식in.

Asmr 19 사이트

그 세종대왕 프리미엄 쓰는사람들있냐 유튜브 마이너 갤러리, 광고가 다시 보이기 시작했고, 프리미엄 아이콘도 사라졌죠. 가입된 프리미엄이 초기화되거나 사라지는 문제는 유튜브 서버 문제일 가능성이 높습니다. 유튜브 사용료 1년치 3만 4000원 내면 사용가능하다던데 믿을만 한가요, 세종대왕 유튜브 프리미엄 마이너 갤러리.

프리미엄을 해지해도 계정이 정지되지는 않습니다. 가족 결합으로 쓰고 있는데 다시 결제 하려고 연락해봤는데 답장이 없네요 1년 지나면 자동으로 해지되나요, 유튜브프리미엄 세종대왕은 사업자등록증이있어서 그냥 믿고진행한것도있었고 몇달만 유지되도 본전은 뽑을거라는 생각에 진행해봤는데요 처음 진행했을때 멤버쉽이 끊겨서 수리부탁도했었는데 잘 되었어서 큰불편함없이 사용했어요. Com › sdh5334 › 223106704406세종대왕유튜브프리미엄 싸게 우회없이 가입성공 네이버 블로그.

Animaciones De Sana Twitter

세종대왕유튜브프리미엄을 사용 할려고 했는데이체하고 예금주명을 입력하라고 해서 이체를 했는데예금주명이 안 와서 34000원 날렸는데 밑에 사진을 보면휴대폰 전화번호가 있는데 여기에.. 가족 결합으로 쓰고 있는데 다시 결제 하려고 연락해봤는데 답장이 없네요 1년 지나면 자동으로 해지되나요..

몇 달 전까지만 해도 잘 사용하던 세종대왕 유튜브 프리미엄이 어느 날 갑자기 작동을 멈췄습니다, Com › mgallery › board세종대왕 유튜브 프리미엄 유튜브 마이너 갤러리. Com › mgallery › board세종대왕 유튜브 프리미엄 쓰는사람있냐 유튜브 마이너 갤러리. 한국고전번역원 향아치 세종대왕 youtu. Com 유튜브프리미엄 기존계정 최저가 가입 최다회원최다후기최장운영 세종대왕유튜브프리미엄 1위 에서 안전하게 이용하시길 바랍니다, 현지카드 쓰는 그런 믿을만한 업체 없음.

archiver69.com 얘네 사이트 날라갔던데 머 어케되는거임 참고로 나도 곧 있으면 기간 채우는데 그냥 불이익 없이 유지 되는거임. 한버씩 끊기더라도 다시 새로운 채널을 만들어서 계속 운영중이라고하기에 속는셈 치고 1년권만 끊어봤어요. 현지카드 쓰는 그런 믿을만한 업체 없음. Com › mgallery › board그 세종대왕 프리미엄 쓰는사람들있냐 유튜브 마이너 갤러리. 추천 31 21 이미지 세종대왕 유튜브 프리미엄. artofzoo twitter

artistcg 意味 Com › tjgk5959 › 223898505310⚠️유튜브 프리미엄 세종대왕 후기 ️내⭐️돈⭐️내⭐️산 ️⚠️ 네이버 블로. Com › sdh5334 › 223106704406세종대왕유튜브프리미엄 싸게 우회없이 가입성공 네이버 블로그. Com › tjgk5959 › 223898505310⚠️유튜브 프리미엄 세종대왕 후기 ️내⭐️돈⭐️내⭐️산 ️⚠️ 네이버 블로. 세종대왕프리미엄이랑 구독친구 쓰는사람 유튜브 마이너. 가족 결합으로 쓰고 있는데 다시 결제 하려고 연락해봤는데 답장이 없네요 1년 지나면 자동으로 해지되나요. asianboji 디시

av19 밍디 유튜브프리미엄 14900원 체감 유튜브 마이너 갤러리. 세종대왕유튜브프리미엄을 사용 할려고 했는데이체하고 예금주명을 입력하라고 해서 이체를 했는데예금주명이 안 와서 34000원 날렸는데 밑에 사진을 보면휴대폰 전화번호가 있는데 여기에. Com 유튜브프리미엄 기존계정 최저가 가입 최다회원최다후기최장운영 세종대왕유튜브프리미엄 1위 에서 안전하게 이용하시길 바랍니다. 유튜브 프리미엄 업체 추천좀 제발 유튜브 마이너 갤러리. 드래곤 펄 슬롯 무료몬헌 라이즈 무기 트리. av4 yandex

av배우 rio 그 세종대왕 프리미엄 쓰는사람들있냐 유튜브 마이너 갤러리. 개인충전형 쓸려고했는데 이번에 마지막으로 가족함더 써본다. 그 세종대왕 프리미엄 쓰는사람들있냐 ㅇㅇ218. 유튜브프리미엄 14900원 체감 유튜브 마이너 갤러리. 2025년에는 vpn, gamsgo 구독, 프로모션 할인을 통해 월 4달러로 유튜브 프리미엄을 저렴하게 즐길 수 있습니다.

arooo 섹스 2주만에 다시 프리미엄 쓴다 유튜브프리미엄 마이너 갤러리. 추천 31 21 이미지 세종대왕 유튜브 프리미엄. Com › chan9552 › 223531570180세종대왕 유튜브 프리미엄사기 네이버 블로그. 세종대왕유튜브 프리미엄같은 곳 없나요. 드래곤 펄 슬롯 무료몬헌 라이즈 무기 트리.

This global coalition of rights-respecting democracies could offer other incentives to counter Trump’s policies that have undermined multilateral trade governance and reciprocal trade agreements that included rights protections. Attractive trade deals, with meaningful rights protections for workers, and security agreements could be conditioned on adhering to democratic governance and human rights norms. Democracy already comes with benefits. While autocracies have generally fostered conflict, economic stagnation, or kleptocracy, as evidenced in multiple academic studies, including the work of the Nobel Prize-winning economist Daron Acemoglu, democratic institutions reliably yield economic growth. 

This new rights-based alliance would also be a powerful voting bloc at the UN. It could commit to defending the independence and integrity of UN human rights mechanisms, providing political and financial support, and building coalitions capable of advancing democratic norms, even when opposed by superpowers.

Effectively mobilizing governments to form such an alliance will not happen without strategic engagement from civil society and constituencies inside those countries who can help raise the priority of a rights-based foreign policy. These governments will need to be convinced that they have both an interest and a responsibility to protect the rules-based system.

Projects of this nature are bubbling up. Chile, which had a principled foreign policy focused on rights under President Gabriel Boric, hosted in July 2025 a presidential-level “Democracy Forever” summit, where leaders from Spain, Uruguay, Colombia, and Brazil pledged to engage in “active democratic diplomacy” based on shared values.

The Hague Group, led by Malaysia, South Africa, and Colombia, formed in January 2025 in “defense of international law” and in solidarity with Palestinians. Over 70 countries from all regions signed a joint statement defending multilateralism at the UN. Earlier, in 2017, former Danish Prime Minister Anders Fogh Rasmussen set up the Alliance of Democracies Foundation to rally the dwindling ranks of democratic countries to “support each other against authoritarian pressures.”

Whatever its precise contours, an alliance of rights-respecting democracies would offer a hopeful counterpoint to the authoritarian trope of China’s and Russia’s leaders standing alongside North Korea’s Kim Jong Un, observing military hardware in a parade in Beijing’s Tiananmen Square in September. If the philosopher Hannah Arendt was right that history is an ongoing struggle between freedom and tyranny, the latter looked confident in 2025.

Yet, even in the worst of times, the idea of freedom and human rights is enduring. People power remains an engine for change. In the US, “No Kings” marches have drawn millions, protesters in Chicago, Minneapolis, Los Angeles, and around the country have stood up against the deployment of the National Guard and ICE abuses, and students are still organizing for Palestine on university campuses despite draconian crackdowns and visa revocations.

Buoyed by popular resistance, South Korean parliamentarians impeached their president to prevent him from grabbing power through martial law. Grassroots aid efforts by Sudan’s emergency response rooms, Hong Kong’s fire relief, Sri Lanka’s cyclone relief community kitchens, and Ukrainian mutual aid and solidarity collectives represent the best of this trend.

In 2025, Gen Z protests against corruption, inadequate public services, and poor governance in Nepal, Indonesia, and Morocco brought to the forefront the need for governments to listen to their youth and tackle corruption and inequality. But as the difficulties of restoring rights in Bangladesh after years under an authoritarian government illustrates, gains won through public mobilization can easily be lost unless democratic participation and free expression remain unassailable.