머스크 그록, 가상의 성인 상반신 노출 이미지 허용실제 사람 아냐 로스앤젤레스연합뉴스 임미나 특파원 일론 머스크가 소유한 엑스x옛.

Will Human Rights Survive a Trumpian World?

Authoritarian Advances Threaten Rules-Based Order

The global human rights system is in peril. Under relentless pressure from US President Donald Trump, and persistently undermined by China and Russia, the rules-based international order is being crushed, threatening to take with it the architecture human rights defenders have come to rely on to advance norms and protect freedoms. To defy this trend, governments that still value human rights, alongside social movements, civil society, and international institutions, need to form a strategic alliance to push back.

To be fair, the downward spiral predated Trump’s reelection. The democratic wave that began over 50 years ago has given way to what scholars term a “democratic recession.” Democracy is now back to 1985 levels according to some metrics, with 72 percent of the world’s population now living under autocracy. Russia and China are less free today than 20 years ago. And so is the United States.

Of course, democracy is not a panacea for human rights violations; the US and other longtime democracies have their own histories of colonial crimes, racism, abusive justice systems, and wartime atrocities. More recently, authoritarian leaders have exploited public mistrust and anger to win elections and then dismantled the very institutions that brought them to power. Democratic institutions are crucial to represent the will of the people and keep power in check. It’s no surprise that whenever democracy is undermined, rights are too, as evident in recent years in India, Türkiye, the Philippines, El Salvador, and Hungary.

In this context, 2025 may be seen as a tipping point. In just 12 months, the Trump administration has carried out a broad assault on key pillars of US democracy and the global rules-based order, which the US, despite inconsistencies, was, with other states, instrumental in helping to establish.

In short order, Trump’s second-term administration has undermined trust in the sanctity of elections, reduced government accountability, gutted food assistance and healthcare subsidies, attacked judicial independence, defied court orders, rolled back women’s rights, obstructed access to abortion care, undermined remedies for racial harm, terminated programs mandating accessibility for people with disabilities, punished free speech, stripped protections from trans and intersex people, eroded privacy, and used government power to intimidate political opponents, the media, law firms, universities, civil society, and even comedians.

Claiming a risk of “civilizational erasure” in Europe and leaning on racist tropes to cast entire populations as unwelcome in the US, the Trump administration has embraced policies and rhetoric that align with white nationalist ideology. Immigrants and asylum seekers have been subjected to inhumane conditions and degrading treatment; 32 died in US Immigration and Customs Enforcement custody in 2025, and as of mid-January 2026, an additional 4 have died. Masked immigration enforcement agents have targeted people of color, using excessive force, terrorizing communities, wrongfully arresting scores of citizens, and, most recently, unjustifiably killing two people in Minneapolis, whose deaths Human Rights Watch has documented.

The US president of course has the authority to tighten US borders and enforce stricter immigration policies. The administration is not, however, entitled to deny legal process to asylum seekers, mistreat undocumented migrants, or unlawfully discriminate. In a well-functioning democracy, no electoral mandate should supersede domestic legislation, constitutional protections, or international human rights law. Trump’s team has repeatedly bypassed these guardrails.

The violations have not stopped at the border. The Trump administration used a 1798 law to send hundreds of Venezuelan migrants to an infamous prison in El Salvador, where they were tortured and sexually abused. Its blatantly unlawful strikes on boats in the Caribbean and the Pacific extrajudicially killed more than 120 people whom Trump claims were drug traffickers.

After the US attacked Venezuela and apprehended its president, Nicolás Maduro, and his wife, Cilia Flores, Trump claimed the US would “run” the country and control its vast oil reserves. Despite paying lip service to human rights concerns under Maduro at the United Nations, Trump has worked with the same repressive apparatus to further US interests. Many Western allies have chosen to stay silent about these lawless moves, perhaps fearing erratic tariffs and blowback to their alliances.

Trump’s foreign policy has upended the foundations of the rules-based order that seeks to advance democracy and human rights, even if imperfectly.

Trump has boasted that he doesn’t “need international law” as a constraint, only his “own morality.” His administration has politicized the US State Department’s annual human rights report, stepped away from the global prohibition on antipersonnel landmines, voiced support for rewriting international rules on asylum, and skipped the UN’s Universal Periodic Review of the US’ human rights record.

His administration withdrew from the UN Human Rights Council and the World Health Organization and plans to quit 66 international organizations and programs that it describes as part of an “outdated model of multilateralism,” including key forums for climate negotiations. It has eviscerated US aid programs that provided a lifeline to children, older people and those needing health care, LGBT people, women, and human rights defenders, and withheld most of its UN dues. 

Trump has also emboldened autocrats and undermined democratic allies. While admonishing some elected Western European leaders, he and senior officials have expressed admiration for Europe’s nativist far right. He has favored autocrats such as Hungary’s Prime Minister Viktor Orban, Türkiye’s President Recep Tayyip Erdoğan, and El Salvador’s President Nayib Bukele, while continuing decades of US support to Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman and Egypt’s President Abdel Fattah al-Sisi.

His administration has unjustifiably imposed sanctions to punish respected Palestinian human rights organizations, the International Criminal Court’s (ICC) prosecutor and many of its judges, a UN special rapporteur, and for several months, a Brazilian Supreme Court judge and his wife.

The institutional response in the US to Trump’s power grabs has been shockingly muted. Much of Congress, controlled by his own party, has not challenged his supercharged expansion of executive power. The leaders of the US’ most powerful technology companies have made significant donations and sought to placate the president. Some big law firms and prestigious universities have made deals rather than assert their independence, and some media organizations seem afraid to attract the president’s ire.

Has the US switched sides on the human rights playing field? While US engagement with human rights institutions has always been selective, China and Russia have long pursued an illiberal agenda. They stand much to gain from a US government that now expresses open hostility to universal rights. China and Russia remain strategic rivals of the US, but all three countries are now led by leaders who share open disdain for norms and institutions that could constrain their power.

Together, they wield considerable economic, military, and diplomatic power. If they were to consistently act as allies of convenience to erode global rules, they could threaten the entire system. Already, a loose international network of countries such as North Korea, Iran, Venezuela, Myanmar, Cuba, and Belarus work in concert with Russia and China. These leaders share very little ideologically but align in undermining human rights and promoting a regressive international agenda. In word and in practice, the US government is now helping them in this endeavor.

The US’ weakening of multilateral institutions also dealt a serious blow to global efforts to prevent or stop grave international crimes. The “never again” movement, born from the horrors of the Holocaust and reignited by the Rwandan and Bosnian genocides, spurred the UN General Assembly to embrace the Responsibility to Protect (R2P) in 2005. Meant to guide international intervention to prevent and stop atrocities in tandem with efforts to prosecute and punish serious crimes, R2P made a real difference in places like the Central African Republic and Kenya.

Today, R2P is rarely invoked and the ICC is under siege. In addition to Trump’s far-reaching sanctions, in December 2025 a Moscow court sentenced the ICC prosecutor and eight of its judges to prison terms in absentia. Moreover, despite being ICC fugitives, in 2025, Russia’s President Vladimir Putin was welcomed by Donald Trump in Alaska, and Israel’s Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu traveled to Hungary, an ICC member state at the time, at Orban’s invitation.

Twenty years ago, the US government and civil society were instrumental in galvanizing a response to mass atrocities in Darfur. Sudan is burning again, but this time under Trump, with relative impunity. Sudan’s Rapid Support Forces (RSF), which emerged from the militias that led the prior ethnic cleansing campaign, are again committing murder and rape on a mass scale. A growing body of evidence indicates that the UAE, a longtime US ally that recently made multi-billion-dollar deals with Trump, is providing the RSF with military support.

In the Occupied Palestinian Territory, the Israeli armed forces have committed acts of genocide, ethnic cleansing, and crimes against humanity, killing over 70,000 people since the October 2023 Hamas-led attacks on Israel and displacing the vast majority of Gaza’s population. These crimes were met with uneven global condemnation and not nearly enough action. Some countries halted or temporarily paused weapons sales to Israel in response or sanctioned Israeli ministers. Trump, however, continued a long-standing US policy of almost unconditional support to Israel, even as the International Court of Justice is weighing allegations of genocide and has issued binding orders under the Genocide Convention to protect Palestinians’ rights.

Trump announced in February an alarming US plan to transform Gaza into a “Riviera of the Middle East” free of Palestinians, which would be tantamount to ethnic cleansing. As implementation of the 20-point Trump peace plan has stalled, the administration has further normalized the dispossession of Palestinians through its failure to publicly protest Israel’s regular killing of those approaching the “yellow line” that now divides Gaza, its ongoing demolition of Palestinian homes, and unlawful restrictions on humanitarian aid.

In Ukraine, Trump’s peace efforts have consistently downplayed Russia’s responsibility for serious violations. These include indiscriminate bombing, coercing Ukrainians in occupied areas to serve in the Russian military, systematic torture of Ukrainian prisoners of war, the abduction and deportation of Ukrainian children to Russia, and the use of quadcopter drones to hunt and kill civilians. Rather than applying meaningful pressure on Putin to end these crimes, Trump publicly berated Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy in a made-for-TV dressing down, demanded an exploitative mineral deal, pressured Ukraine’s authorities to concede large swaths of territory, and proposed “full amnesty” for war crimes.

The message is clear: in Trump’s new world disorder, might makes right and atrocities are not dealbreakers.

해외it동향 그록 grok, 매운맛 spicy 설정으로 테일러 스위프트의 누드 딥페이크를 즉시 생성하다 okurin. 노출이 있는 복장을 한 실제 인물의 이미지를 편집하는 것을 그록 계정이 허용하지 않도록 기술적 조치를 시행했다고 밝혔다. 노출이 있는 복장을 한 실제 인물의 이미지를 편집하는 것을 그록 계정이 허용하지 않도록 기술적 조치를 시행했다고 밝혔다. 일론 머스크가 이끄는 인공지능 기업 xai의 챗봇 그록grok이 미성년자를 부적절하게 묘사한 이미지를 생성게시했다가 이용자 신고 이후 삭제.

Kr › Article › 2026010310011400415머스크의 Ai 그록, 미성년자 노출 이미지 생성 논란.

해외it동향 그록 Grok, 매운맛 Spicy 설정으로 테일러 스위프트의 누드 딥페이크를 즉시 생성하다 Okurin.

Kr › view › akr20260115050900075머스크의 엑스 그록, 노출 이미지 생성 않도록 기술적 조치 연합.. 26 0552 파일당 25 np 7일간 무료 업로더20%적립..

머스크의 엑스 그록, 노출 이미지 생성 않도록 기술적 조치.

머스크의 ’그록’, 접속 차단 잇따라 yt.. 일론 머스크의 ai 서비스 그록은 최근 이른바 딥페이크 이미지를 만드는 서비스를 내놨습니다..

엘론 머스크의 엑스x가 ai 챗봇 그록의 딥페이크 이미지 생성 논란에 대응해 기술적 조치를 도입했다, 우리나라와 일본 정부도 그록에 대책을 요구했고, 영국과 유럽연합은 공식 조사에 착수했습니다. Kr › view › akr20260115050900075머스크의 엑스 그록, 노출 이미지 생성 않도록 기술적 조치 연합.

Kr › View › Akr20260115050900075머스크의 엑스 그록, 노출 이미지 생성 않도록 기술적 조치 연합.

그록이 특정 상황에서 사용자와 상호작용하는 방식이 위험하다는 지적이다. 일론 머스크가 소유한 엑스의 ai 서비스인 ’그록’의 이른바 딥 페이크 영상 파문이 전 세계로 확산하고 있습니다. 하지만 레오타드나 원피스형 수영복 등 몸매가 드러나는 이미지는 여전히 생성 가능한 상태다.

그록, 생성 이미지 중 41%가 성적 이미지로 나타나 Kmj.

머스크의 ai 그록, 미성년자 노출 이미지 생성 논란안전장치 구멍 양은하 기자 2026. 어린 아이 옷까지 벗겼다노출 사진 찍어내는 논란의 ai 팩플. 휙huick 인공지능 챗봇 그록이 성적 딥페이크 이미지 생성 논란에 휘말려 eu 집행위원회가 디지털서비스법 위반 여부를 조사 중이다.

zonamaeee 三人組 머스크의 ’그록’, 접속 차단 잇따라 yt. 소셜 미디어 플랫폼 x구 트위터에 통합된 인공지능 챗봇 grok이 사용자 사진을 동의 없이 비키니를 입은 모습의 딥페이크 이미지로 변조하며 큰 논란이 read more. Kr 그록 grok, 매운맛 spicy 설정으로 테일러 스위프트의 누드 딥페이크를 즉시 생성하다. 우리나라와 일본 정부도 그록에 대책을 요구했고, 영국과 유럽연합은 공식 조사에 착수했습니다. Com › article › 2026010394367머스크 ai 그록, 미성년자 노출 이미지 생성 논란 한국경제. ネツアイプログレス hitomi

zerad1101 야동 Com › watch내 얼굴로 노출 영상을. 일론 머스크가 설립한 인공지능ai 기업 xai의 챗봇 그록grok이 성적 이미지 생성 문제를 둘러싸고 논란의 중심에 섰다. 그가 올린 이미지에는 엑스 내에서 제공하는 인공지능ai 서비스 ‘그록grok. 엑스 안전팀은 14일 현지시간 자체 계정에 올린 글에서 우리는 아동. Com › article › 2026010394367머스크 ai 그록, 미성년자 노출 이미지 생성 논란 한국경제. бондс від айкос ціна

_sena pikpak 일론 머스크가 이끄는 인공지능ai 기업 xai가 챗봇 그록의 이미지동영상 생성 기능을 출시하며 또 다시 도마위에 올랐다. 일론 머스크의 인공지능 회사 xai에서 챗봇 그록grok을 훈련하는 직원들이 아동 성 착취물을 포함한 성인 콘텐츠에 반복적으로 노출되고 있다는 사실이 드러났다. Kr › article › 2026010310011400415머스크의 ai 그록, 미성년자 노출 이미지 생성 논란. 나는 ‘설마 이게 진짜일 리 없다’고 생각했다. 머스크의 엑스 그록, 노출 이미지 생성 않도록 기술적 조치 일론 머스크가 소유한 엑스x옛 트위터가 인공지능ai 챗봇 그록의 여성아동 딥. yutnoey

「お前がフった陰キャ女、今じゃフォロワー100万人超えの爆乳グラビアアイドルだぞ？w」2 ―彼女のいる俺をむちむち爆乳ボディで誘惑してきて逆ntr― えろ 인공지능 ai 챗봇 ‘그록’의 ai 페르소나 시스템 프롬프트가 노출, 논란이 됐다. 일론 머스크가 설립한 인공지능ai 스타트업 xai의 챗봇 ‘그록’의 성인용 버전이 구체적인 명령 없이 자의적으로 톱스타의 상반신을 노출한. 그록은 최근 이른바 딥페이크 이미지를 만드는 서비스 노출 영상은 차단한다고 밝혔지만, 노출이 불법인 지역에만 적용되는 거여서 매우. 뉴스스페이스김정영 기자 일론 머스크의 xai가 개발한 그록ai가 사용자 프롬프트에 따라 미성년자 성적 이미지를 생성한 스캔들이 전 세계적 공분을 일으키며, 플랫폼의 최소 가드레일 설계가 핵심 비판 대상으로 부상했다. 간단히 말하면 기존 소스가 어느정도인가에 따라서 허용범위가.

купити бондс від айкос 인공지능 ai 챗봇 ‘그록’의 ai 페르소나 시스템 프롬프트가 노출, 논란이 됐다. 특히 그록이 실제 인물의 이미지를 편집해 비키니 차림 등 노출이 심한 상태로 생성하는 것을 허용하지 않도록 기술적 제한을 적용했다고 설명했다. 그가 올린 이미지에는 엑스 내에서 제공하는 인공지능ai 서비스 ‘그록grok. Com › 2026 › 01일론 머스크의 ai 그록grok, 딥페이크 논란에 결국 무릎. 머스크의 ai 그록, 미성년자 노출 이미지 생성 논란안전장치 구멍 양은하 기자 2026.

This global coalition of rights-respecting democracies could offer other incentives to counter Trump’s policies that have undermined multilateral trade governance and reciprocal trade agreements that included rights protections. Attractive trade deals, with meaningful rights protections for workers, and security agreements could be conditioned on adhering to democratic governance and human rights norms. Democracy already comes with benefits. While autocracies have generally fostered conflict, economic stagnation, or kleptocracy, as evidenced in multiple academic studies, including the work of the Nobel Prize-winning economist Daron Acemoglu, democratic institutions reliably yield economic growth. 

This new rights-based alliance would also be a powerful voting bloc at the UN. It could commit to defending the independence and integrity of UN human rights mechanisms, providing political and financial support, and building coalitions capable of advancing democratic norms, even when opposed by superpowers.

Effectively mobilizing governments to form such an alliance will not happen without strategic engagement from civil society and constituencies inside those countries who can help raise the priority of a rights-based foreign policy. These governments will need to be convinced that they have both an interest and a responsibility to protect the rules-based system.

Projects of this nature are bubbling up. Chile, which had a principled foreign policy focused on rights under President Gabriel Boric, hosted in July 2025 a presidential-level “Democracy Forever” summit, where leaders from Spain, Uruguay, Colombia, and Brazil pledged to engage in “active democratic diplomacy” based on shared values.

The Hague Group, led by Malaysia, South Africa, and Colombia, formed in January 2025 in “defense of international law” and in solidarity with Palestinians. Over 70 countries from all regions signed a joint statement defending multilateralism at the UN. Earlier, in 2017, former Danish Prime Minister Anders Fogh Rasmussen set up the Alliance of Democracies Foundation to rally the dwindling ranks of democratic countries to “support each other against authoritarian pressures.”

Whatever its precise contours, an alliance of rights-respecting democracies would offer a hopeful counterpoint to the authoritarian trope of China’s and Russia’s leaders standing alongside North Korea’s Kim Jong Un, observing military hardware in a parade in Beijing’s Tiananmen Square in September. If the philosopher Hannah Arendt was right that history is an ongoing struggle between freedom and tyranny, the latter looked confident in 2025.

Yet, even in the worst of times, the idea of freedom and human rights is enduring. People power remains an engine for change. In the US, “No Kings” marches have drawn millions, protesters in Chicago, Minneapolis, Los Angeles, and around the country have stood up against the deployment of the National Guard and ICE abuses, and students are still organizing for Palestine on university campuses despite draconian crackdowns and visa revocations.

Buoyed by popular resistance, South Korean parliamentarians impeached their president to prevent him from grabbing power through martial law. Grassroots aid efforts by Sudan’s emergency response rooms, Hong Kong’s fire relief, Sri Lanka’s cyclone relief community kitchens, and Ukrainian mutual aid and solidarity collectives represent the best of this trend.

In 2025, Gen Z protests against corruption, inadequate public services, and poor governance in Nepal, Indonesia, and Morocco brought to the forefront the need for governments to listen to their youth and tackle corruption and inequality. But as the difficulties of restoring rights in Bangladesh after years under an authoritarian government illustrates, gains won through public mobilization can easily be lost unless democratic participation and free expression remain unassailable.