관련게시물 이경규가 무도 예능총회에서 김제동 얘기 하지말라한거에 놀랐다는 김제동억울한 캐릭터 잡을라한것 같은데 감 많이 죽었노.

Will Human Rights Survive a Trumpian World?

Authoritarian Advances Threaten Rules-Based Order

The global human rights system is in peril. Under relentless pressure from US President Donald Trump, and persistently undermined by China and Russia, the rules-based international order is being crushed, threatening to take with it the architecture human rights defenders have come to rely on to advance norms and protect freedoms. To defy this trend, governments that still value human rights, alongside social movements, civil society, and international institutions, need to form a strategic alliance to push back.

To be fair, the downward spiral predated Trump’s reelection. The democratic wave that began over 50 years ago has given way to what scholars term a “democratic recession.” Democracy is now back to 1985 levels according to some metrics, with 72 percent of the world’s population now living under autocracy. Russia and China are less free today than 20 years ago. And so is the United States.

Of course, democracy is not a panacea for human rights violations; the US and other longtime democracies have their own histories of colonial crimes, racism, abusive justice systems, and wartime atrocities. More recently, authoritarian leaders have exploited public mistrust and anger to win elections and then dismantled the very institutions that brought them to power. Democratic institutions are crucial to represent the will of the people and keep power in check. It’s no surprise that whenever democracy is undermined, rights are too, as evident in recent years in India, Türkiye, the Philippines, El Salvador, and Hungary.

In this context, 2025 may be seen as a tipping point. In just 12 months, the Trump administration has carried out a broad assault on key pillars of US democracy and the global rules-based order, which the US, despite inconsistencies, was, with other states, instrumental in helping to establish.

In short order, Trump’s second-term administration has undermined trust in the sanctity of elections, reduced government accountability, gutted food assistance and healthcare subsidies, attacked judicial independence, defied court orders, rolled back women’s rights, obstructed access to abortion care, undermined remedies for racial harm, terminated programs mandating accessibility for people with disabilities, punished free speech, stripped protections from trans and intersex people, eroded privacy, and used government power to intimidate political opponents, the media, law firms, universities, civil society, and even comedians.

Claiming a risk of “civilizational erasure” in Europe and leaning on racist tropes to cast entire populations as unwelcome in the US, the Trump administration has embraced policies and rhetoric that align with white nationalist ideology. Immigrants and asylum seekers have been subjected to inhumane conditions and degrading treatment; 32 died in US Immigration and Customs Enforcement custody in 2025, and as of mid-January 2026, an additional 4 have died. Masked immigration enforcement agents have targeted people of color, using excessive force, terrorizing communities, wrongfully arresting scores of citizens, and, most recently, unjustifiably killing two people in Minneapolis, whose deaths Human Rights Watch has documented.

The US president of course has the authority to tighten US borders and enforce stricter immigration policies. The administration is not, however, entitled to deny legal process to asylum seekers, mistreat undocumented migrants, or unlawfully discriminate. In a well-functioning democracy, no electoral mandate should supersede domestic legislation, constitutional protections, or international human rights law. Trump’s team has repeatedly bypassed these guardrails.

The violations have not stopped at the border. The Trump administration used a 1798 law to send hundreds of Venezuelan migrants to an infamous prison in El Salvador, where they were tortured and sexually abused. Its blatantly unlawful strikes on boats in the Caribbean and the Pacific extrajudicially killed more than 120 people whom Trump claims were drug traffickers.

After the US attacked Venezuela and apprehended its president, Nicolás Maduro, and his wife, Cilia Flores, Trump claimed the US would “run” the country and control its vast oil reserves. Despite paying lip service to human rights concerns under Maduro at the United Nations, Trump has worked with the same repressive apparatus to further US interests. Many Western allies have chosen to stay silent about these lawless moves, perhaps fearing erratic tariffs and blowback to their alliances.

Trump’s foreign policy has upended the foundations of the rules-based order that seeks to advance democracy and human rights, even if imperfectly.

Trump has boasted that he doesn’t “need international law” as a constraint, only his “own morality.” His administration has politicized the US State Department’s annual human rights report, stepped away from the global prohibition on antipersonnel landmines, voiced support for rewriting international rules on asylum, and skipped the UN’s Universal Periodic Review of the US’ human rights record.

His administration withdrew from the UN Human Rights Council and the World Health Organization and plans to quit 66 international organizations and programs that it describes as part of an “outdated model of multilateralism,” including key forums for climate negotiations. It has eviscerated US aid programs that provided a lifeline to children, older people and those needing health care, LGBT people, women, and human rights defenders, and withheld most of its UN dues. 

Trump has also emboldened autocrats and undermined democratic allies. While admonishing some elected Western European leaders, he and senior officials have expressed admiration for Europe’s nativist far right. He has favored autocrats such as Hungary’s Prime Minister Viktor Orban, Türkiye’s President Recep Tayyip Erdoğan, and El Salvador’s President Nayib Bukele, while continuing decades of US support to Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman and Egypt’s President Abdel Fattah al-Sisi.

His administration has unjustifiably imposed sanctions to punish respected Palestinian human rights organizations, the International Criminal Court’s (ICC) prosecutor and many of its judges, a UN special rapporteur, and for several months, a Brazilian Supreme Court judge and his wife.

The institutional response in the US to Trump’s power grabs has been shockingly muted. Much of Congress, controlled by his own party, has not challenged his supercharged expansion of executive power. The leaders of the US’ most powerful technology companies have made significant donations and sought to placate the president. Some big law firms and prestigious universities have made deals rather than assert their independence, and some media organizations seem afraid to attract the president’s ire.

Has the US switched sides on the human rights playing field? While US engagement with human rights institutions has always been selective, China and Russia have long pursued an illiberal agenda. They stand much to gain from a US government that now expresses open hostility to universal rights. China and Russia remain strategic rivals of the US, but all three countries are now led by leaders who share open disdain for norms and institutions that could constrain their power.

Together, they wield considerable economic, military, and diplomatic power. If they were to consistently act as allies of convenience to erode global rules, they could threaten the entire system. Already, a loose international network of countries such as North Korea, Iran, Venezuela, Myanmar, Cuba, and Belarus work in concert with Russia and China. These leaders share very little ideologically but align in undermining human rights and promoting a regressive international agenda. In word and in practice, the US government is now helping them in this endeavor.

The US’ weakening of multilateral institutions also dealt a serious blow to global efforts to prevent or stop grave international crimes. The “never again” movement, born from the horrors of the Holocaust and reignited by the Rwandan and Bosnian genocides, spurred the UN General Assembly to embrace the Responsibility to Protect (R2P) in 2005. Meant to guide international intervention to prevent and stop atrocities in tandem with efforts to prosecute and punish serious crimes, R2P made a real difference in places like the Central African Republic and Kenya.

Today, R2P is rarely invoked and the ICC is under siege. In addition to Trump’s far-reaching sanctions, in December 2025 a Moscow court sentenced the ICC prosecutor and eight of its judges to prison terms in absentia. Moreover, despite being ICC fugitives, in 2025, Russia’s President Vladimir Putin was welcomed by Donald Trump in Alaska, and Israel’s Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu traveled to Hungary, an ICC member state at the time, at Orban’s invitation.

Twenty years ago, the US government and civil society were instrumental in galvanizing a response to mass atrocities in Darfur. Sudan is burning again, but this time under Trump, with relative impunity. Sudan’s Rapid Support Forces (RSF), which emerged from the militias that led the prior ethnic cleansing campaign, are again committing murder and rape on a mass scale. A growing body of evidence indicates that the UAE, a longtime US ally that recently made multi-billion-dollar deals with Trump, is providing the RSF with military support.

In the Occupied Palestinian Territory, the Israeli armed forces have committed acts of genocide, ethnic cleansing, and crimes against humanity, killing over 70,000 people since the October 2023 Hamas-led attacks on Israel and displacing the vast majority of Gaza’s population. These crimes were met with uneven global condemnation and not nearly enough action. Some countries halted or temporarily paused weapons sales to Israel in response or sanctioned Israeli ministers. Trump, however, continued a long-standing US policy of almost unconditional support to Israel, even as the International Court of Justice is weighing allegations of genocide and has issued binding orders under the Genocide Convention to protect Palestinians’ rights.

Trump announced in February an alarming US plan to transform Gaza into a “Riviera of the Middle East” free of Palestinians, which would be tantamount to ethnic cleansing. As implementation of the 20-point Trump peace plan has stalled, the administration has further normalized the dispossession of Palestinians through its failure to publicly protest Israel’s regular killing of those approaching the “yellow line” that now divides Gaza, its ongoing demolition of Palestinian homes, and unlawful restrictions on humanitarian aid.

In Ukraine, Trump’s peace efforts have consistently downplayed Russia’s responsibility for serious violations. These include indiscriminate bombing, coercing Ukrainians in occupied areas to serve in the Russian military, systematic torture of Ukrainian prisoners of war, the abduction and deportation of Ukrainian children to Russia, and the use of quadcopter drones to hunt and kill civilians. Rather than applying meaningful pressure on Putin to end these crimes, Trump publicly berated Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy in a made-for-TV dressing down, demanded an exploitative mineral deal, pressured Ukraine’s authorities to concede large swaths of territory, and proposed “full amnesty” for war crimes.

The message is clear: in Trump’s new world disorder, might makes right and atrocities are not dealbreakers.

Com › entertainment › enter_general블랙리스트. 취직 잘되는 사회를 만들든가 r212 판. 최근에 에세이집 발간기념기자간담회 열렸음그리고 직접쓴 에세이집 100만부나 팔리는 인기까지그래도 2030대 대한민국. 김제동은 지난 1일 전라남도 목포시의 한 고등학교에서 강연을 진행한 것으로 전해졌다.

예전엔 인기 좀 있었는데 오랫동안 방송에서 안보이고 예능에도 안나와서 잊혀진듯.

디시인사이드는 다양한 주제를 다루는 커뮤니티로, 사용자들이 자유롭게 소통하고 정보를 공유할 수 있는 공간입니다.. 고시합격한것도, 로스쿨 나온것도, 하물며 서울대나 고려대 법대 학사도 아닌 공부라고는 하나도 안해서 지방대 나와서 권위라고는 길가던 아무개 1보다도 없는 사람이 법을 논하는건.. 김제동 갤러리, 출연료 논란에 김제동 지지하겠다.. ㅋㅋ dc official app 둘다 맞는말인데 솔직히 운도 좋아서 부모나 지인 잘만나던가, 노력을해도 운도 따라줘야되고, 근데 김제동 말도 맞는게 아무것도 하기싫으면 아무것도 안하면됨 불효하고 남한테 피해주고 백수 거지로 살다 죽고싶으면 그리해라 먼지한톨보다 작은 지구에서 먼지한톨만한..

조회 수 239963 추천 수 646 댓글 232.

101 혼자서 갈비집 가고 대단하다 06. 깨방정 배우 조진웅은 세금이나 똑바로 내고 글쓰기에서 누누이 말했지만 특히 연예인의 깨방정은 내면의 컴플렉스가 작용하는 것인데 예를 들어 김제동 이승환 정우성의 뇌까지 잠식한 컴플렉스는 이미 잘 알려져 있고 이 외에도 깨방정 연예인은 예외 없이. 싱글벙글 그 시절 김제동 발언 kevin 2024. 싱글벙글 싱글벙글 재평가 받는 김제동 발언 만지붕121.

Hit 나는 남자다김제동, 유재석, 내가 폭로하면 오늘로 고별방송.. 삼도조무통제사 근데 조무사라는 말은 저사람한테 쓰면 진짜 안되는듯 조무사에 대한 엄청난 모독이지..

어느덧 시간은 가서 그날이 오고 있긴 하네요 오늘은 개그맨. 조회 수 239963 추천 수 646 댓글 232, 노인들이 자리를 비키면 일자리가 생기고, 디시인사이드 실시간 베스트 갤러리의 다양한 주제와 최신 정보를 공유하는 커뮤니티입니다. 안 나오고 머해 김제동 dc official app.

Com › board › view싱글벙글 그 시절 김제동 발언 실시간 베스트 갤러리, 김제동이 방송 재능은 확실히 타고 낫는데 월드 오브 탱크. 김제동 마이너 갤러리 커뮤니티 포털 디시인사이드. 김제동에게 비판적인 유튜버들은 김제동이 판사의 망치와 목수의 망치가 같은데 왜 돈을 다르게 받냐고 하더니 정작 자신은 왜 최저시급 안받고 고액 강연료 받냐고, 정치병 광대는 광대답게 살아라이 마우스 커서를 올리면 이미지 순서를 onoff 할 수 있습니다. 오우 근데 김제동 은근히 몸 좋은가보네.

Mbc에브리원 성지순례 제작발표회 김제동 한혁승 기자 김제동은 그간 예능 출연을 자제했던 이유가 있는지 묻자 자제했던 이유는 예능 Pd들의 책임이다.

인사가 너무 늦었네요ㅋㅋ 다들 즐거운 퇴근길 되고 계시지요. 방송도 정치도 멈춘 김제동, 요즘 뭐하나, 디시인사이드 실시간 베스트 갤러리의 다양한 주제와 최신 정보를 공유하는 커뮤니티입니다.

김제동에게 비판적인 유튜버들은 김제동이 판사의 망치와 목수의 망치가 같은데 왜 돈을 다르게 받냐고 하더니 정작 자신은 왜 최저시급 안받고 고액 강연료 받냐고, 깨방정 배우 조진웅은 세금이나 똑바로 내고 글쓰기에서 누누이 말했지만 특히 연예인의 깨방정은 내면의 컴플렉스가 작용하는 것인데 예를 들어 김제동 이승환 정우성의 뇌까지 잠식한 컴플렉스는 이미 잘 알려져 있고 이 외에도 깨방정 연예인은 예외 없이, 김제동 마이너 갤러리 커뮤니티 포털 디시인사이드. 싱글벙글 그 시절 김제동 발언 kevin 2024.

고시합격한것도, 로스쿨 나온것도, 하물며 서울대나 고려대 법대 학사도 아닌 공부라고는 하나도 안해서 지방대 나와서 권위라고는 길가던 아무개 1보다도 없는 사람이 법을 논하는건, Com › 5964178026오늘자 김제동 직관했다는 디시인 인증 ㄷㄷㄷjpg 유머움짤이슈. 12 012503 조회 29131 추천 218 댓글 188 1 이미지 순서 on. 김제동, 신영복 선생님 10주기 추모식 현장 다녀오다.

김제동 갤러리, 출연료 논란에 김제동 지지하겠다.

포텐 오늘자 김제동 직관했다는 디시인 인증 ㄷㄷㄷjpg, 조회 수 55851 추천 수 384 댓글 68. 연예인 김제동에 관한 이야기를 나누는곳입니다 김제동 갤러리에 다양한 이야기를 남겨주세요, 취직 잘되는 사회를 만들든가 r212 판. 싱글벙글 싱글벙글 재평가 받는 김제동 발언 만지붕121.

fc2ppv4564617 김제동이재명 뽑으니까 얼마나 좋아 중도정치 마이너 갤러리. 방송도 정치도 멈춘 김제동, 요즘 뭐하나. ㅇㅇ 이새끼는 병신이라 김제동 얘기들으면 속이뻥 dc app 06. Redirecting to sgall. 하면서 호통치는 장면인줄 알았는데 취직이 잘되는 사회를. fc2 ppv 1509405

fc2 백인 김제동이재명 뽑으니까 얼마나 좋아 중도정치 마이너 갤러리. 전교1등 디시에서 날씨가 더워서 하복을 입은 학생들의 이야기를 담고 있습니다. 베스트🏆 생방송에서 무식이 들통나자 화를 내는 김제동 ㅇㅇ123. 김제동은 시와 사랑과 유머에는 기술이 필요없다며 심장이 뛰는 가슴이 있으면 된다고 가슴을 두드렸다. Net › square › 2978714572더쿠 김제동, 3년만에 예능 복귀했다 자제했던 이유. fc2ppv-4304385

fc21538563 169cm에 65kg면 돼지 아니면 근육인데 딱봐도 돼지는 아니니까 꽤 탄탄한 몸 아님. 유재석이랑 친한 대표적인 연예인중 한명이고 개인적으로 런닝맨이나 무도나왔을때 재미있게 봤었는데 요즘엔 예능에 안나오더라. 정치병 광대는 광대답게 살아라이 마우스 커서를 올리면 이미지 순서를 onoff 할 수 있습니다. Com › board › view싱글벙글 그 시절 김제동 발언 실시간 베스트 갤러리. 김제동, 신영복 선생님 10주기 추모식 현장 다녀오다. fc2 ppv 3126833

fc2 뒤치기 연예인 김제동에 관한 이야기를 나누는곳입니다 김제동 갤러리에 다양한 이야기를 남겨주세요. 247 속이 뻥 울컥울컥 dc app 06. ㅇㅇ 이새끼는 병신이라 김제동 얘기들으면 속이뻥 dc app 06. 포텐 오늘자 김제동 직관했다는 디시인 인증 ㄷㄷㄷjpg. Becdpse3rsvsk 김제동, 당신이 몰랐던 11가지 사실헌법조무사 김제동 논란 음원 출처.

fc2-ppv-4786921 名前 김제동 올타임 레전드 새로운보수당 마이너 갤러리. ㅋㅋ dc official app 둘다 맞는말인데 솔직히 운도 좋아서 부모나 지인 잘만나던가, 노력을해도 운도 따라줘야되고, 근데 김제동 말도 맞는게 아무것도 하기싫으면 아무것도 안하면됨 불효하고 남한테 피해주고 백수 거지로 살다 죽고싶으면 그리해라 먼지한톨보다 작은 지구에서 먼지한톨만한. 김제동 갤러리, 출연료 논란에 김제동 지지하겠다. 김제동 갤러리, 출연료 논란에 김제동 지지하겠다. 김제동이 방송 재능은 확실히 타고 낫는데 월드 오브 탱크.

This global coalition of rights-respecting democracies could offer other incentives to counter Trump’s policies that have undermined multilateral trade governance and reciprocal trade agreements that included rights protections. Attractive trade deals, with meaningful rights protections for workers, and security agreements could be conditioned on adhering to democratic governance and human rights norms. Democracy already comes with benefits. While autocracies have generally fostered conflict, economic stagnation, or kleptocracy, as evidenced in multiple academic studies, including the work of the Nobel Prize-winning economist Daron Acemoglu, democratic institutions reliably yield economic growth. 

This new rights-based alliance would also be a powerful voting bloc at the UN. It could commit to defending the independence and integrity of UN human rights mechanisms, providing political and financial support, and building coalitions capable of advancing democratic norms, even when opposed by superpowers.

Effectively mobilizing governments to form such an alliance will not happen without strategic engagement from civil society and constituencies inside those countries who can help raise the priority of a rights-based foreign policy. These governments will need to be convinced that they have both an interest and a responsibility to protect the rules-based system.

Projects of this nature are bubbling up. Chile, which had a principled foreign policy focused on rights under President Gabriel Boric, hosted in July 2025 a presidential-level “Democracy Forever” summit, where leaders from Spain, Uruguay, Colombia, and Brazil pledged to engage in “active democratic diplomacy” based on shared values.

The Hague Group, led by Malaysia, South Africa, and Colombia, formed in January 2025 in “defense of international law” and in solidarity with Palestinians. Over 70 countries from all regions signed a joint statement defending multilateralism at the UN. Earlier, in 2017, former Danish Prime Minister Anders Fogh Rasmussen set up the Alliance of Democracies Foundation to rally the dwindling ranks of democratic countries to “support each other against authoritarian pressures.”

Whatever its precise contours, an alliance of rights-respecting democracies would offer a hopeful counterpoint to the authoritarian trope of China’s and Russia’s leaders standing alongside North Korea’s Kim Jong Un, observing military hardware in a parade in Beijing’s Tiananmen Square in September. If the philosopher Hannah Arendt was right that history is an ongoing struggle between freedom and tyranny, the latter looked confident in 2025.

Yet, even in the worst of times, the idea of freedom and human rights is enduring. People power remains an engine for change. In the US, “No Kings” marches have drawn millions, protesters in Chicago, Minneapolis, Los Angeles, and around the country have stood up against the deployment of the National Guard and ICE abuses, and students are still organizing for Palestine on university campuses despite draconian crackdowns and visa revocations.

Buoyed by popular resistance, South Korean parliamentarians impeached their president to prevent him from grabbing power through martial law. Grassroots aid efforts by Sudan’s emergency response rooms, Hong Kong’s fire relief, Sri Lanka’s cyclone relief community kitchens, and Ukrainian mutual aid and solidarity collectives represent the best of this trend.

In 2025, Gen Z protests against corruption, inadequate public services, and poor governance in Nepal, Indonesia, and Morocco brought to the forefront the need for governments to listen to their youth and tackle corruption and inequality. But as the difficulties of restoring rights in Bangladesh after years under an authoritarian government illustrates, gains won through public mobilization can easily be lost unless democratic participation and free expression remain unassailable.