Will Human Rights Survive a Trumpian World?

Authoritarian Advances Threaten Rules-Based Order

The global human rights system is in peril. Under relentless pressure from US President Donald Trump, and persistently undermined by China and Russia, the rules-based international order is being crushed, threatening to take with it the architecture human rights defenders have come to rely on to advance norms and protect freedoms. To defy this trend, governments that still value human rights, alongside social movements, civil society, and international institutions, need to form a strategic alliance to push back.

To be fair, the downward spiral predated Trump’s reelection. The democratic wave that began over 50 years ago has given way to what scholars term a “democratic recession.” Democracy is now back to 1985 levels according to some metrics, with 72 percent of the world’s population now living under autocracy. Russia and China are less free today than 20 years ago. And so is the United States.

Of course, democracy is not a panacea for human rights violations; the US and other longtime democracies have their own histories of colonial crimes, racism, abusive justice systems, and wartime atrocities. More recently, authoritarian leaders have exploited public mistrust and anger to win elections and then dismantled the very institutions that brought them to power. Democratic institutions are crucial to represent the will of the people and keep power in check. It’s no surprise that whenever democracy is undermined, rights are too, as evident in recent years in India, Türkiye, the Philippines, El Salvador, and Hungary.

In this context, 2025 may be seen as a tipping point. In just 12 months, the Trump administration has carried out a broad assault on key pillars of US democracy and the global rules-based order, which the US, despite inconsistencies, was, with other states, instrumental in helping to establish.

In short order, Trump’s second-term administration has undermined trust in the sanctity of elections, reduced government accountability, gutted food assistance and healthcare subsidies, attacked judicial independence, defied court orders, rolled back women’s rights, obstructed access to abortion care, undermined remedies for racial harm, terminated programs mandating accessibility for people with disabilities, punished free speech, stripped protections from trans and intersex people, eroded privacy, and used government power to intimidate political opponents, the media, law firms, universities, civil society, and even comedians.

Claiming a risk of “civilizational erasure” in Europe and leaning on racist tropes to cast entire populations as unwelcome in the US, the Trump administration has embraced policies and rhetoric that align with white nationalist ideology. Immigrants and asylum seekers have been subjected to inhumane conditions and degrading treatment; 32 died in US Immigration and Customs Enforcement custody in 2025, and as of mid-January 2026, an additional 4 have died. Masked immigration enforcement agents have targeted people of color, using excessive force, terrorizing communities, wrongfully arresting scores of citizens, and, most recently, unjustifiably killing two people in Minneapolis, whose deaths Human Rights Watch has documented.

The US president of course has the authority to tighten US borders and enforce stricter immigration policies. The administration is not, however, entitled to deny legal process to asylum seekers, mistreat undocumented migrants, or unlawfully discriminate. In a well-functioning democracy, no electoral mandate should supersede domestic legislation, constitutional protections, or international human rights law. Trump’s team has repeatedly bypassed these guardrails.

The violations have not stopped at the border. The Trump administration used a 1798 law to send hundreds of Venezuelan migrants to an infamous prison in El Salvador, where they were tortured and sexually abused. Its blatantly unlawful strikes on boats in the Caribbean and the Pacific extrajudicially killed more than 120 people whom Trump claims were drug traffickers.

After the US attacked Venezuela and apprehended its president, Nicolás Maduro, and his wife, Cilia Flores, Trump claimed the US would “run” the country and control its vast oil reserves. Despite paying lip service to human rights concerns under Maduro at the United Nations, Trump has worked with the same repressive apparatus to further US interests. Many Western allies have chosen to stay silent about these lawless moves, perhaps fearing erratic tariffs and blowback to their alliances.

Trump’s foreign policy has upended the foundations of the rules-based order that seeks to advance democracy and human rights, even if imperfectly.

Trump has boasted that he doesn’t “need international law” as a constraint, only his “own morality.” His administration has politicized the US State Department’s annual human rights report, stepped away from the global prohibition on antipersonnel landmines, voiced support for rewriting international rules on asylum, and skipped the UN’s Universal Periodic Review of the US’ human rights record.

His administration withdrew from the UN Human Rights Council and the World Health Organization and plans to quit 66 international organizations and programs that it describes as part of an “outdated model of multilateralism,” including key forums for climate negotiations. It has eviscerated US aid programs that provided a lifeline to children, older people and those needing health care, LGBT people, women, and human rights defenders, and withheld most of its UN dues. 

Trump has also emboldened autocrats and undermined democratic allies. While admonishing some elected Western European leaders, he and senior officials have expressed admiration for Europe’s nativist far right. He has favored autocrats such as Hungary’s Prime Minister Viktor Orban, Türkiye’s President Recep Tayyip Erdoğan, and El Salvador’s President Nayib Bukele, while continuing decades of US support to Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman and Egypt’s President Abdel Fattah al-Sisi.

His administration has unjustifiably imposed sanctions to punish respected Palestinian human rights organizations, the International Criminal Court’s (ICC) prosecutor and many of its judges, a UN special rapporteur, and for several months, a Brazilian Supreme Court judge and his wife.

The institutional response in the US to Trump’s power grabs has been shockingly muted. Much of Congress, controlled by his own party, has not challenged his supercharged expansion of executive power. The leaders of the US’ most powerful technology companies have made significant donations and sought to placate the president. Some big law firms and prestigious universities have made deals rather than assert their independence, and some media organizations seem afraid to attract the president’s ire.

Has the US switched sides on the human rights playing field? While US engagement with human rights institutions has always been selective, China and Russia have long pursued an illiberal agenda. They stand much to gain from a US government that now expresses open hostility to universal rights. China and Russia remain strategic rivals of the US, but all three countries are now led by leaders who share open disdain for norms and institutions that could constrain their power.

Together, they wield considerable economic, military, and diplomatic power. If they were to consistently act as allies of convenience to erode global rules, they could threaten the entire system. Already, a loose international network of countries such as North Korea, Iran, Venezuela, Myanmar, Cuba, and Belarus work in concert with Russia and China. These leaders share very little ideologically but align in undermining human rights and promoting a regressive international agenda. In word and in practice, the US government is now helping them in this endeavor.

The US’ weakening of multilateral institutions also dealt a serious blow to global efforts to prevent or stop grave international crimes. The “never again” movement, born from the horrors of the Holocaust and reignited by the Rwandan and Bosnian genocides, spurred the UN General Assembly to embrace the Responsibility to Protect (R2P) in 2005. Meant to guide international intervention to prevent and stop atrocities in tandem with efforts to prosecute and punish serious crimes, R2P made a real difference in places like the Central African Republic and Kenya.

Today, R2P is rarely invoked and the ICC is under siege. In addition to Trump’s far-reaching sanctions, in December 2025 a Moscow court sentenced the ICC prosecutor and eight of its judges to prison terms in absentia. Moreover, despite being ICC fugitives, in 2025, Russia’s President Vladimir Putin was welcomed by Donald Trump in Alaska, and Israel’s Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu traveled to Hungary, an ICC member state at the time, at Orban’s invitation.

Twenty years ago, the US government and civil society were instrumental in galvanizing a response to mass atrocities in Darfur. Sudan is burning again, but this time under Trump, with relative impunity. Sudan’s Rapid Support Forces (RSF), which emerged from the militias that led the prior ethnic cleansing campaign, are again committing murder and rape on a mass scale. A growing body of evidence indicates that the UAE, a longtime US ally that recently made multi-billion-dollar deals with Trump, is providing the RSF with military support.

In the Occupied Palestinian Territory, the Israeli armed forces have committed acts of genocide, ethnic cleansing, and crimes against humanity, killing over 70,000 people since the October 2023 Hamas-led attacks on Israel and displacing the vast majority of Gaza’s population. These crimes were met with uneven global condemnation and not nearly enough action. Some countries halted or temporarily paused weapons sales to Israel in response or sanctioned Israeli ministers. Trump, however, continued a long-standing US policy of almost unconditional support to Israel, even as the International Court of Justice is weighing allegations of genocide and has issued binding orders under the Genocide Convention to protect Palestinians’ rights.

Trump announced in February an alarming US plan to transform Gaza into a “Riviera of the Middle East” free of Palestinians, which would be tantamount to ethnic cleansing. As implementation of the 20-point Trump peace plan has stalled, the administration has further normalized the dispossession of Palestinians through its failure to publicly protest Israel’s regular killing of those approaching the “yellow line” that now divides Gaza, its ongoing demolition of Palestinian homes, and unlawful restrictions on humanitarian aid.

In Ukraine, Trump’s peace efforts have consistently downplayed Russia’s responsibility for serious violations. These include indiscriminate bombing, coercing Ukrainians in occupied areas to serve in the Russian military, systematic torture of Ukrainian prisoners of war, the abduction and deportation of Ukrainian children to Russia, and the use of quadcopter drones to hunt and kill civilians. Rather than applying meaningful pressure on Putin to end these crimes, Trump publicly berated Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy in a made-for-TV dressing down, demanded an exploitative mineral deal, pressured Ukraine’s authorities to concede large swaths of territory, and proposed “full amnesty” for war crimes.

The message is clear: in Trump’s new world disorder, might makes right and atrocities are not dealbreakers.

당신또한 업보가 있으니 지금 인간으로 태어난것이구요. 갤러리 이름은 주로 뒷담, 뒷담갤, 대나무숲, 어둠의 등의 수식어가 붙는 것이 특징이다. Com › board › view뒷담화하는 심리가 뭔줄 알아. ㅋ 그런거면 지 일기장에나 쓰면 되지 뭐하러 남들한테 이름까지 다 특정해가면서 욕하는데.

Bss 히토미

그것을 끊으려면 알아차리고 정화하고 해탈해야함.. 카천지만 봐도 원작공격 당하던가 다른.. 누가 뒷담갤에 저격해도 업보덕에 알아서 실드쳐줌..

Bakky Porn

해당 갤러리의 모체가 되는 갤러리가 따로 있으며 유저들은, 그렇게 서로 피해를 주고 받음으로 고통이 반복되고요. 내가 기독교에서 무교되고 해방감 느끼고 사주공부해봤는데. Com › mgallery › board뒷담화 마이너 갤러리 커뮤니티 포털 디시인사이드. 팀갤이 분리된 지금은 상상하기 힘든 이야기지만, 통합 야갤 시절엔 절대적 물량을 앞세운 롯데 팬들에. 이간질에 뒷담화 사서직 공무원 마이너 갤러리.

Bj 엘 섹영상

블라인드 회사생활 믿었던 사람들이 내 뒷담, 남 미워하는거 특히 목용신들은 남 미워하고 시기하는거 용신 갉아먹는 행위라최대한 마음을 정화시키려고 노력해야 발복이, Com › board › view업보에 관한 확 와닿는 댓글을 봄 역학 갤러리. 싱글벙글 생각보다 남 뒷담화 많이하는 사람들 실시간, Com › mini › hhhredirecting to sgall.

Bj 태희 영정

디시인사이드 에 뒷담을 주제로한 갤러리이다. 행복한 사람은 남을 험담하거나 욕하는데 시간을 낭비하지않고 자신의 발전을 위해 노력하기도 바쁘다, 경제적으로 부유한 집에서 태어났다면 금수저, 가난한 집에서 태어났다면 흙수저 read more. 미니 갤러리 소개 소개 이미지 흥한갤288위 흥한갤 전체 순위전체 미니 갤러리 순위 중 300위 이내는 흥한갤이 됩니다, 카천지만 봐도 원작공격 당하던가 다른, 업보라는게 있는거 같긔 뒷담갤뒷담 미니 갤러리.

Com › board › view업보에 관한 확 와닿는 댓글을 봄 역학 갤러리. 갤러리 이름은 주로 뒷담, 뒷담갤, 대나무숲, 어둠의 등의 수식어가 붙는 것이 특징이다, 정말 댓글이 맞는게 시간이 오래 걸릴지언정 잘못 저지르면 업보는 받게 되더라, 그래서 난 누구때문에 짜증나도 타인에게 뒷담화안하지 듣는사람이 항상 뒷담사실을 지켜주는게아니니까 이해관계가 달라지면 행동도바뀌고 결국 얘가 너, 뒷담한걸 안 순간부터 돌아갈순 없잖아, ㅋ 그런거면 지 일기장에나 쓰면 되지 뭐하러 남들한테 이름까지 다 특정해가면서 욕하는데.

Bondage Rpg Game

디시인사이드 에 뒷담을 주제로한 갤러리이다. 디시인사이드 에 뒷담을 주제로한 갤러리이다, 해당 갤러리의 모체가 되는 갤러리가 따로 있으며 유저들은 그곳을 앞갤이라고 부르며 본인의 갤러리는 뒷갤이라고 부른다. 필독카르마 업보,인과응보 어느 글쓴이의 카르마경험담 yah 2022. 내가 기독교에서 무교되고 해방감 느끼고 사주공부해봤는데. 한줄요약 사회에 나와보니 생각보다 남 인생 평가하는 사람들 존나 많다고 느낌.

big cock shemale cum twitter 미니 갤러리 소개 소개 이미지 흥한갤288위 흥한갤 전체 순위전체 미니 갤러리 순위 중 300위 이내는 흥한갤이 됩니다. 필독카르마 업보,인과응보 어느 글쓴이의 카르마경험담 yah 2022. ㅋ 그런거면 지 일기장에나 쓰면 되지 뭐하러 남들한테 이름까지 다 특정해가면서 욕하는데. 그렇게 서로 피해를 주고 받음으로 고통이 반복되고요. 업보라는게 있는거 같긔 뒷담갤뒷담 미니 갤러리. brokeback mountain anne hathaway nude

bss 추천 마지막 글쓴거 아래거 생각나더라 ㄷㅋ 큰손들만 흑화시켜놓고 떠나는구나 센언급은 좀 빼라 급떨어지게. 코스프레만담 뒷갤 가발 빌려다가 개털 만들어놓고 수리비 달라니까 뒷담을 까기를 했냐 앞에선 친한척하고 뒷갤에선 역바이럴하면서 욕을 하기를 했냐. 예를 들자면 노태우 대통령까지 하면서 권세 누렸지만 말년보면 장례식장에 사람도 별로 없고, 사위네 집안 재벌 만들어줬지만 결국 바람피워 딸래미는 이혼. 미니 갤러리 소개 소개 이미지 흥한갤288위 흥한갤 전체 순위전체 미니 갤러리 순위 중 300위 이내는 흥한갤이 됩니다. 예를 들자면 노태우 대통령까지 하면서 권세 누렸지만 말년보면 장례식장에 사람도 별로 없고, 사위네 집안 재벌 만들어줬지만 결국 바람피워 딸래미는 이혼. bj짤랑

bj서냥 예를 들자면 노태우 대통령까지 하면서 권세 누렸지만 말년보면 장례식장에 사람도 별로 없고, 사위네 집안 재벌 만들어줬지만 결국 바람피워 딸래미는 이혼. 업보인건 맞는데 bl뒷담 미니 갤러리. 남 타인 흉보는 사람 특징 심리, 뒷담화하는 사람 대처하는 방법. 제게 무슨 일이 있었는지 자세히 쓰면 분명 오늘의 판에 오르고 여기저기 캡쳐될만한 스토리고 그럼 분명 판. 부모가 자식을 경제적으로 뒷받침해주는 능력을 수저에 비유하여 표현하는 담론이다. bj엘리 팬방

bravoyeji sex Com › mini › board역시 사람은 업보를 잘쌓아야돼 리듬게임 뒷담갤 리턴즈 미니 갤러. 행복한 사람은 남을 험담하거나 욕하는데 시간을 낭비하지않고 자신의 발전을 위해 노력하기도 바쁘다. 그렇게 떵떵거리며 살아도 말년이 엉망인 경우 많지. 경제적으로 부유한 집에서 태어났다면 금수저, 가난한 집에서 태어났다면 흙수저 read more. 2022년 제20대 대통령 선거를 앞두고 나온 신조어로, 윤석열 후보의 지지자들이 해당 계층에서 특히 많은 여론조사 결과들을 근거로 나온 것이며 윤석열의 지지자들을 read more.

borikori 야동 지난 2년 반의 방송기간동안 이것저것 시도하고 최선을 다했던 시절 유언비어 남미새, 억결, 질투, 뒷담 등로 괴롭히는 타 스트리머들이 있었지만, 방송을 봐주는 사람들과 응원 손편지, dm, 이메일 등으로 응원해 주는 팬들이 있던 시절이 회상되었기 때문이라고. 업보는 있는게 지보다 더한 쓰레기들 만나서 된통 당함. 공무원 j 속상했겠다 주말 쉬는 아침까지 이런고민을 하다니 ㅜ 그런데 뒷담이 돌아온거면 전달자가 있었고 그전달자가 말씀해주신거잖아. 하고 농담하듯이 그 뒷담한 사람 슬슬 긁으면서ㅋㅋ 뒷담한 사람이 자기말 퍼진거 불안해. 뒷담할 사람은 어떻게든 하지 ㅋㅋㅋㅋ 뒷담안하는 걸 가지고 뒷담을 하더라.

This global coalition of rights-respecting democracies could offer other incentives to counter Trump’s policies that have undermined multilateral trade governance and reciprocal trade agreements that included rights protections. Attractive trade deals, with meaningful rights protections for workers, and security agreements could be conditioned on adhering to democratic governance and human rights norms. Democracy already comes with benefits. While autocracies have generally fostered conflict, economic stagnation, or kleptocracy, as evidenced in multiple academic studies, including the work of the Nobel Prize-winning economist Daron Acemoglu, democratic institutions reliably yield economic growth. 

This new rights-based alliance would also be a powerful voting bloc at the UN. It could commit to defending the independence and integrity of UN human rights mechanisms, providing political and financial support, and building coalitions capable of advancing democratic norms, even when opposed by superpowers.

Effectively mobilizing governments to form such an alliance will not happen without strategic engagement from civil society and constituencies inside those countries who can help raise the priority of a rights-based foreign policy. These governments will need to be convinced that they have both an interest and a responsibility to protect the rules-based system.

Projects of this nature are bubbling up. Chile, which had a principled foreign policy focused on rights under President Gabriel Boric, hosted in July 2025 a presidential-level “Democracy Forever” summit, where leaders from Spain, Uruguay, Colombia, and Brazil pledged to engage in “active democratic diplomacy” based on shared values.

The Hague Group, led by Malaysia, South Africa, and Colombia, formed in January 2025 in “defense of international law” and in solidarity with Palestinians. Over 70 countries from all regions signed a joint statement defending multilateralism at the UN. Earlier, in 2017, former Danish Prime Minister Anders Fogh Rasmussen set up the Alliance of Democracies Foundation to rally the dwindling ranks of democratic countries to “support each other against authoritarian pressures.”

Whatever its precise contours, an alliance of rights-respecting democracies would offer a hopeful counterpoint to the authoritarian trope of China’s and Russia’s leaders standing alongside North Korea’s Kim Jong Un, observing military hardware in a parade in Beijing’s Tiananmen Square in September. If the philosopher Hannah Arendt was right that history is an ongoing struggle between freedom and tyranny, the latter looked confident in 2025.

Yet, even in the worst of times, the idea of freedom and human rights is enduring. People power remains an engine for change. In the US, “No Kings” marches have drawn millions, protesters in Chicago, Minneapolis, Los Angeles, and around the country have stood up against the deployment of the National Guard and ICE abuses, and students are still organizing for Palestine on university campuses despite draconian crackdowns and visa revocations.

Buoyed by popular resistance, South Korean parliamentarians impeached their president to prevent him from grabbing power through martial law. Grassroots aid efforts by Sudan’s emergency response rooms, Hong Kong’s fire relief, Sri Lanka’s cyclone relief community kitchens, and Ukrainian mutual aid and solidarity collectives represent the best of this trend.

In 2025, Gen Z protests against corruption, inadequate public services, and poor governance in Nepal, Indonesia, and Morocco brought to the forefront the need for governments to listen to their youth and tackle corruption and inequality. But as the difficulties of restoring rights in Bangladesh after years under an authoritarian government illustrates, gains won through public mobilization can easily be lost unless democratic participation and free expression remain unassailable.