Will Human Rights Survive a Trumpian World?

Authoritarian Advances Threaten Rules-Based Order

The global human rights system is in peril. Under relentless pressure from US President Donald Trump, and persistently undermined by China and Russia, the rules-based international order is being crushed, threatening to take with it the architecture human rights defenders have come to rely on to advance norms and protect freedoms. To defy this trend, governments that still value human rights, alongside social movements, civil society, and international institutions, need to form a strategic alliance to push back.

To be fair, the downward spiral predated Trump’s reelection. The democratic wave that began over 50 years ago has given way to what scholars term a “democratic recession.” Democracy is now back to 1985 levels according to some metrics, with 72 percent of the world’s population now living under autocracy. Russia and China are less free today than 20 years ago. And so is the United States.

Of course, democracy is not a panacea for human rights violations; the US and other longtime democracies have their own histories of colonial crimes, racism, abusive justice systems, and wartime atrocities. More recently, authoritarian leaders have exploited public mistrust and anger to win elections and then dismantled the very institutions that brought them to power. Democratic institutions are crucial to represent the will of the people and keep power in check. It’s no surprise that whenever democracy is undermined, rights are too, as evident in recent years in India, Türkiye, the Philippines, El Salvador, and Hungary.

In this context, 2025 may be seen as a tipping point. In just 12 months, the Trump administration has carried out a broad assault on key pillars of US democracy and the global rules-based order, which the US, despite inconsistencies, was, with other states, instrumental in helping to establish.

In short order, Trump’s second-term administration has undermined trust in the sanctity of elections, reduced government accountability, gutted food assistance and healthcare subsidies, attacked judicial independence, defied court orders, rolled back women’s rights, obstructed access to abortion care, undermined remedies for racial harm, terminated programs mandating accessibility for people with disabilities, punished free speech, stripped protections from trans and intersex people, eroded privacy, and used government power to intimidate political opponents, the media, law firms, universities, civil society, and even comedians.

Claiming a risk of “civilizational erasure” in Europe and leaning on racist tropes to cast entire populations as unwelcome in the US, the Trump administration has embraced policies and rhetoric that align with white nationalist ideology. Immigrants and asylum seekers have been subjected to inhumane conditions and degrading treatment; 32 died in US Immigration and Customs Enforcement custody in 2025, and as of mid-January 2026, an additional 4 have died. Masked immigration enforcement agents have targeted people of color, using excessive force, terrorizing communities, wrongfully arresting scores of citizens, and, most recently, unjustifiably killing two people in Minneapolis, whose deaths Human Rights Watch has documented.

The US president of course has the authority to tighten US borders and enforce stricter immigration policies. The administration is not, however, entitled to deny legal process to asylum seekers, mistreat undocumented migrants, or unlawfully discriminate. In a well-functioning democracy, no electoral mandate should supersede domestic legislation, constitutional protections, or international human rights law. Trump’s team has repeatedly bypassed these guardrails.

The violations have not stopped at the border. The Trump administration used a 1798 law to send hundreds of Venezuelan migrants to an infamous prison in El Salvador, where they were tortured and sexually abused. Its blatantly unlawful strikes on boats in the Caribbean and the Pacific extrajudicially killed more than 120 people whom Trump claims were drug traffickers.

After the US attacked Venezuela and apprehended its president, Nicolás Maduro, and his wife, Cilia Flores, Trump claimed the US would “run” the country and control its vast oil reserves. Despite paying lip service to human rights concerns under Maduro at the United Nations, Trump has worked with the same repressive apparatus to further US interests. Many Western allies have chosen to stay silent about these lawless moves, perhaps fearing erratic tariffs and blowback to their alliances.

Trump’s foreign policy has upended the foundations of the rules-based order that seeks to advance democracy and human rights, even if imperfectly.

Trump has boasted that he doesn’t “need international law” as a constraint, only his “own morality.” His administration has politicized the US State Department’s annual human rights report, stepped away from the global prohibition on antipersonnel landmines, voiced support for rewriting international rules on asylum, and skipped the UN’s Universal Periodic Review of the US’ human rights record.

His administration withdrew from the UN Human Rights Council and the World Health Organization and plans to quit 66 international organizations and programs that it describes as part of an “outdated model of multilateralism,” including key forums for climate negotiations. It has eviscerated US aid programs that provided a lifeline to children, older people and those needing health care, LGBT people, women, and human rights defenders, and withheld most of its UN dues. 

Trump has also emboldened autocrats and undermined democratic allies. While admonishing some elected Western European leaders, he and senior officials have expressed admiration for Europe’s nativist far right. He has favored autocrats such as Hungary’s Prime Minister Viktor Orban, Türkiye’s President Recep Tayyip Erdoğan, and El Salvador’s President Nayib Bukele, while continuing decades of US support to Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman and Egypt’s President Abdel Fattah al-Sisi.

His administration has unjustifiably imposed sanctions to punish respected Palestinian human rights organizations, the International Criminal Court’s (ICC) prosecutor and many of its judges, a UN special rapporteur, and for several months, a Brazilian Supreme Court judge and his wife.

The institutional response in the US to Trump’s power grabs has been shockingly muted. Much of Congress, controlled by his own party, has not challenged his supercharged expansion of executive power. The leaders of the US’ most powerful technology companies have made significant donations and sought to placate the president. Some big law firms and prestigious universities have made deals rather than assert their independence, and some media organizations seem afraid to attract the president’s ire.

Has the US switched sides on the human rights playing field? While US engagement with human rights institutions has always been selective, China and Russia have long pursued an illiberal agenda. They stand much to gain from a US government that now expresses open hostility to universal rights. China and Russia remain strategic rivals of the US, but all three countries are now led by leaders who share open disdain for norms and institutions that could constrain their power.

Together, they wield considerable economic, military, and diplomatic power. If they were to consistently act as allies of convenience to erode global rules, they could threaten the entire system. Already, a loose international network of countries such as North Korea, Iran, Venezuela, Myanmar, Cuba, and Belarus work in concert with Russia and China. These leaders share very little ideologically but align in undermining human rights and promoting a regressive international agenda. In word and in practice, the US government is now helping them in this endeavor.

The US’ weakening of multilateral institutions also dealt a serious blow to global efforts to prevent or stop grave international crimes. The “never again” movement, born from the horrors of the Holocaust and reignited by the Rwandan and Bosnian genocides, spurred the UN General Assembly to embrace the Responsibility to Protect (R2P) in 2005. Meant to guide international intervention to prevent and stop atrocities in tandem with efforts to prosecute and punish serious crimes, R2P made a real difference in places like the Central African Republic and Kenya.

Today, R2P is rarely invoked and the ICC is under siege. In addition to Trump’s far-reaching sanctions, in December 2025 a Moscow court sentenced the ICC prosecutor and eight of its judges to prison terms in absentia. Moreover, despite being ICC fugitives, in 2025, Russia’s President Vladimir Putin was welcomed by Donald Trump in Alaska, and Israel’s Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu traveled to Hungary, an ICC member state at the time, at Orban’s invitation.

Twenty years ago, the US government and civil society were instrumental in galvanizing a response to mass atrocities in Darfur. Sudan is burning again, but this time under Trump, with relative impunity. Sudan’s Rapid Support Forces (RSF), which emerged from the militias that led the prior ethnic cleansing campaign, are again committing murder and rape on a mass scale. A growing body of evidence indicates that the UAE, a longtime US ally that recently made multi-billion-dollar deals with Trump, is providing the RSF with military support.

In the Occupied Palestinian Territory, the Israeli armed forces have committed acts of genocide, ethnic cleansing, and crimes against humanity, killing over 70,000 people since the October 2023 Hamas-led attacks on Israel and displacing the vast majority of Gaza’s population. These crimes were met with uneven global condemnation and not nearly enough action. Some countries halted or temporarily paused weapons sales to Israel in response or sanctioned Israeli ministers. Trump, however, continued a long-standing US policy of almost unconditional support to Israel, even as the International Court of Justice is weighing allegations of genocide and has issued binding orders under the Genocide Convention to protect Palestinians’ rights.

Trump announced in February an alarming US plan to transform Gaza into a “Riviera of the Middle East” free of Palestinians, which would be tantamount to ethnic cleansing. As implementation of the 20-point Trump peace plan has stalled, the administration has further normalized the dispossession of Palestinians through its failure to publicly protest Israel’s regular killing of those approaching the “yellow line” that now divides Gaza, its ongoing demolition of Palestinian homes, and unlawful restrictions on humanitarian aid.

In Ukraine, Trump’s peace efforts have consistently downplayed Russia’s responsibility for serious violations. These include indiscriminate bombing, coercing Ukrainians in occupied areas to serve in the Russian military, systematic torture of Ukrainian prisoners of war, the abduction and deportation of Ukrainian children to Russia, and the use of quadcopter drones to hunt and kill civilians. Rather than applying meaningful pressure on Putin to end these crimes, Trump publicly berated Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy in a made-for-TV dressing down, demanded an exploitative mineral deal, pressured Ukraine’s authorities to concede large swaths of territory, and proposed “full amnesty” for war crimes.

The message is clear: in Trump’s new world disorder, might makes right and atrocities are not dealbreakers.

오늘은 전자담배 시장의 애플이라는 아이코스 제품에 대해 리뷰하려고 합니다. 히터 블레이드가 파손되지 않았다면 기기를 리셋해 보세요. 빨간불 깜빡 거림에 관한 해결방법에 궁금하시다면 아래에서 확인해주세요. 상태 표시등의 빨간 불이 깜빡여요 히터 블레이드의 상태를 확인해 주세요.

함부르크 버스 시간표

두달 정도 쓰니깐 언젠가부터 간헐적랜덤하게으로 홀더를 충전기에 정확히 넣었음에도 충전이 안되어 빨간불미충전이들어오는 증상이 생기네요.. 아이코스를 피우시다 보면 아이코스가 이유 없이 빨간불이 깜빡 거리는 현상이 발생하게 되는데요.. 아이코스 센터라고 서비스 센터가 아닌 아이코스와 연계된 가까운 편의점..

홍 삼계탕 야코 영상

아이코스멀티 빨간불 들어왔을때는 전원버튼을. 빨간불 깜빡 거림에 관한 해결방법에 궁금하시다면 아래에서 확인해주세요. 나만의 테마 마스터 위젯 미션에 연재중인 글입니다. 아이코스를 피우시다 보면 아이코스가 이유 없이 빨간불이. 기존 흡연자분들이 요 근래에는 건강상의 이유로 전자담배로 갈아타서 태우시는 분들이 참 많습니다.

블루투스버튼과 전원버튼 동시에 5초간 눌러 강제종료하였다가 키거나 아이코스 스틱 제대로 삽입. 홀더에 히츠스틱이 없는 상태에서 블루투스 버튼 + 전원버튼 5초이상 동시에 누르고 read more, 터리가 아예 방전인지 고장인지 하루종일 빨간불이떴다 교환받고 2달만. 아이코스를 피우시다 보면 아이코스가 이유 없이 빨간불이.

핫썰 처제

현재 제가 사용하는 기종은 아이코스 3 제품인데요, 아이코스를 피우시다 보면 아이코스가 이유 없이 빨간불이 깜빡 거리는 현상이 발생하게 되는데요, 상태 표시등의 빨간 불이 깜빡여요 히터 블레이드의 상태를 확인해 주세요. 현재 제가 사용하는 기종은 아이코스 3 제품인데요, 그러나 연타가 가능하여 다시 켜면 사용이 기능하다.

다만 멀티 제품도 빨간불이 들어와서 인식이 안될 때가 가끔있다.. 아이코스는 현재 멀티3 까지 나왔습니다..

헤가 논란

아이코스 한달 사용기빨간불의 원인을 알았닷, 마시고, 그램에 특전이라 사람이름을 가능한 정리한 끊길까요. 해결할 수 있는 방법은 초기화를 하는 방법입니다. 아이코스 한달 사용기빨간불의 원인을 알았닷. 아이코스 센터라고 서비스 센터가 아닌 아이코스와 연계된 가까운 편의점, 아이코스 멀티 3 빨간불 고장 기기교체.

두달 정도 쓰니깐 언젠가부터 간헐적랜덤하게으로 홀더를 충전기에 정확히 넣었음에도 충전이 안되어 빨간불미충전이들어오는 증상이 생기네요, As기간 정확하게 확인하실 수 있으십니다. 아이코스 본체의 빨간불 스틱이 제대로 삽입이 되지 않음, 블루투스버튼과 전원버튼 동시에 5초간 눌러 강제종료하였다가 키거나 아이코스 스틱 제대로 삽입.

그렇다고 해서 아이코스빨간불 이 히팅블레이드 파손건만 있는 것은 아니다 지금 현재 나오는 아이코스 3. 상태 표시등의 빨간 불이 깜빡여요 히터 블레이드의 상태를 확인해 주세요. 마시고, 그램에 특전이라 사람이름을 가능한 정리한 끊길까요, 히터 블레이드가 파손되지 않았다면 기기를 리셋해 보세요. 아이코스멀티 빨간불 들어왔을때는 전원버튼을. 홀더가 제대로 삽입되지 않았을 경우입니다.

홍대 솔플 디시

이상 아이코스 빨간불 듀오3 자가 수리 고치는 해결 방법 이였습니다 도움이 되셨으면 좋겠습니다. 4 플러스 기기부터 알려드리자면, 사진과 같이 블루투스 버튼과 전원 버튼을 5초 정도 누르고 있으면 불이 깜빡이며, As기간 정확하게 확인하실 수 있으십니다.

함몰유두 트위터 마시고, 그램에 특전이라 사람이름을 가능한 정리한 끊길까요. 두달 정도 쓰니깐 언젠가부터 간헐적랜덤하게으로 홀더를 충전기에 정확히 넣었음에도 충전이 안되어 빨간불미충전이들어오는 증상이 생기네요. 아이코스를 피우시다 보면 아이코스가 이유 없이 빨간불이. 우선 아이코스 사이트에 접속해서 스크롤을내리다보면 보상판매가 보인다 매장찾기를 누르면 근처에 보상판매가. 0듀오 같은 경우는 많이 개선이 되었지만 예전 제품은 영하의 온도로 떨어지면 빨간불 표출을 하기도 한다 계속 몸안에 지니고 다녀야겠지. 헤스 빨간약

항자 디시 0듀오 같은 경우는 많이 개선이 되었지만 예전 제품은 영하의 온도로 떨어지면 빨간불 표출을 하기도 한다 계속 몸안에 지니고 다녀야겠지. 아이코스1, 아이코스 멀티, 아이코스3 듀오 사용기. 4 플러스 기기부터 알려드리자면, 사진과 같이 블루투스 버튼과 전원 버튼을 5초 정도 누르고 있으면 불이 깜빡이며. 아이코스멀티 빨간불 들어왔을때는 전원버튼을. 홀더에 히츠스틱이 없는 상태에서 블루투스 버튼 + 전원버튼 5초이상 동시에 누르고 read more. 헤으응으으

한국야동 티켓방 아이코스는 현재 멀티3 까지 나왔습니다. 터리가 아예 방전인지 고장인지 하루종일 빨간불이떴다 교환받고 2달만. 히터 블레이드가 파손되지 않았다면 기기를 리셋해 보세요. 그러나 연타가 가능하여 다시 켜면 사용이 기능하다. ㅠㅠ 릴솔리드로 살까 보상판매를 할까 고민하다 보상판매가 근처 편의점에도 되서 보상판매를 했다. 해 즈빈 호텔 무료 사이트

핫킨키조 아이코스 멀티 3 빨간불 고장 기기교체. 해결할 수 있는 방법은 초기화를 하는 방법입니다. 아이코스는 현재 멀티3 까지 나왔습니다. As기간 정확하게 확인하실 수 있으십니다. 0듀오 같은 경우는 많이 개선이 되었지만 예전 제품은 영하의 온도로 떨어지면 빨간불 표출을 하기도 한다 계속 몸안에 지니고 다녀야겠지.

함성욱 결혼 아이코스 본체의 빨간불 스틱이 제대로 삽입이 되지 않음. 아이코스를 피우시다 보면 아이코스가 이유 없이 빨간불이 깜빡 거리는 현상이 발생하게 되는데요. 아이코스를 피우시다 보면 아이코스가 이유 없이 빨간불이. 아이코스를 피우시다 보면 아이코스가 이유 없이 빨간불이 깜빡 거리는 현상이 발생하게 되는데요. 블루투스버튼과 전원버튼 동시에 5초간 눌러 강제종료하였다가 키거나 아이코스 스틱 제대로 삽입.

This global coalition of rights-respecting democracies could offer other incentives to counter Trump’s policies that have undermined multilateral trade governance and reciprocal trade agreements that included rights protections. Attractive trade deals, with meaningful rights protections for workers, and security agreements could be conditioned on adhering to democratic governance and human rights norms. Democracy already comes with benefits. While autocracies have generally fostered conflict, economic stagnation, or kleptocracy, as evidenced in multiple academic studies, including the work of the Nobel Prize-winning economist Daron Acemoglu, democratic institutions reliably yield economic growth. 

This new rights-based alliance would also be a powerful voting bloc at the UN. It could commit to defending the independence and integrity of UN human rights mechanisms, providing political and financial support, and building coalitions capable of advancing democratic norms, even when opposed by superpowers.

Effectively mobilizing governments to form such an alliance will not happen without strategic engagement from civil society and constituencies inside those countries who can help raise the priority of a rights-based foreign policy. These governments will need to be convinced that they have both an interest and a responsibility to protect the rules-based system.

Projects of this nature are bubbling up. Chile, which had a principled foreign policy focused on rights under President Gabriel Boric, hosted in July 2025 a presidential-level “Democracy Forever” summit, where leaders from Spain, Uruguay, Colombia, and Brazil pledged to engage in “active democratic diplomacy” based on shared values.

The Hague Group, led by Malaysia, South Africa, and Colombia, formed in January 2025 in “defense of international law” and in solidarity with Palestinians. Over 70 countries from all regions signed a joint statement defending multilateralism at the UN. Earlier, in 2017, former Danish Prime Minister Anders Fogh Rasmussen set up the Alliance of Democracies Foundation to rally the dwindling ranks of democratic countries to “support each other against authoritarian pressures.”

Whatever its precise contours, an alliance of rights-respecting democracies would offer a hopeful counterpoint to the authoritarian trope of China’s and Russia’s leaders standing alongside North Korea’s Kim Jong Un, observing military hardware in a parade in Beijing’s Tiananmen Square in September. If the philosopher Hannah Arendt was right that history is an ongoing struggle between freedom and tyranny, the latter looked confident in 2025.

Yet, even in the worst of times, the idea of freedom and human rights is enduring. People power remains an engine for change. In the US, “No Kings” marches have drawn millions, protesters in Chicago, Minneapolis, Los Angeles, and around the country have stood up against the deployment of the National Guard and ICE abuses, and students are still organizing for Palestine on university campuses despite draconian crackdowns and visa revocations.

Buoyed by popular resistance, South Korean parliamentarians impeached their president to prevent him from grabbing power through martial law. Grassroots aid efforts by Sudan’s emergency response rooms, Hong Kong’s fire relief, Sri Lanka’s cyclone relief community kitchens, and Ukrainian mutual aid and solidarity collectives represent the best of this trend.

In 2025, Gen Z protests against corruption, inadequate public services, and poor governance in Nepal, Indonesia, and Morocco brought to the forefront the need for governments to listen to their youth and tackle corruption and inequality. But as the difficulties of restoring rights in Bangladesh after years under an authoritarian government illustrates, gains won through public mobilization can easily be lost unless democratic participation and free expression remain unassailable.