US Border Patrol Cmdr. Gregory Bovino (C) walks through a department store in St. Paul, Minnesota, June 4, 2026.
A Venezuelan migrant sits inside a cell at CECOT prison in Tecoluca, El Salvador, June 4, 2026.
The global human rights system is in peril. Under relentless pressure from US President Donald Trump, and persistently undermined by China and Russia, the rules-based international order is being crushed, threatening to take with it the architecture human rights defenders have come to rely on to advance norms and protect freedoms. To defy this trend, governments that still value human rights, alongside social movements, civil society, and international institutions, need to form a strategic alliance to push back.
To be fair, the downward spiral predated Trump’s reelection. The democratic wave that began over 50 years ago has given way to what scholars term a “democratic recession.” Democracy is now back to 1985 levels according to some metrics, with 72 percent of the world’s population now living under autocracy. Russia and China are less free today than 20 years ago. And so is the United States.
Of course, democracy is not a panacea for human rights violations; the US and other longtime democracies have their own histories of colonial crimes, racism, abusive justice systems, and wartime atrocities. More recently, authoritarian leaders have exploited public mistrust and anger to win elections and then dismantled the very institutions that brought them to power. Democratic institutions are crucial to represent the will of the people and keep power in check. It’s no surprise that whenever democracy is undermined, rights are too, as evident in recent years in India, Türkiye, the Philippines, El Salvador, and Hungary.
FIRST: The Momentum Movement’s parliamentary representative David Bedo and independent member of parliament Akos Hadhazy protest against a law that bans Pride marches in Hungary and imposes fines on organizers and attendees of such events, Budapest, June 4, 2026. © 2025 Marton Monus/Reuters; SECOND: University students confront riot police in Istanbul’s Beşiktaş district following the arrest of Istanbul Mayor Ekrem İmamoğlu, June 4, 2026. © 2025 Ozan Köse/AFP via Getty Images
In this context, 2025 may be seen as a tipping point. In just 12 months, the Trump administration has carried out a broad assault on key pillars of US democracy and the global rules-based order, which the US, despite inconsistencies, was, with other states, instrumental in helping to establish.
In short order, Trump’s second-term administration has undermined trust in the sanctity of elections, reduced government accountability, gutted food assistance and healthcare subsidies, attacked judicial independence, defied court orders, rolled back women’s rights, obstructed access to abortion care, undermined remedies for racial harm, terminated programs mandating accessibility for people with disabilities, punished free speech, stripped protections from trans and intersex people, eroded privacy, and used government power to intimidate political opponents, the media, law firms, universities, civil society, and even comedians.
Claiming a risk of “civilizational erasure” in Europe and leaning on racist tropes to cast entire populations as unwelcome in the US, the Trump administration has embraced policies and rhetoric that align with white nationalist ideology. Immigrants and asylum seekers have been subjected to inhumane conditions and degrading treatment; 32 died in US Immigration and Customs Enforcement custody in 2025, and as of mid-January 2026, an additional 4 have died. Masked immigration enforcement agents have targeted people of color, using excessive force, terrorizing communities, wrongfully arresting scores of citizens, and, most recently, unjustifiably killing two people in Minneapolis, whose deaths Human Rights Watch has documented.
The US president of course has the authority to tighten US borders and enforce stricter immigration policies. The administration is not, however, entitled to deny legal process to asylum seekers, mistreat undocumented migrants, or unlawfully discriminate. In a well-functioning democracy, no electoral mandate should supersede domestic legislation, constitutional protections, or international human rights law. Trump’s team has repeatedly bypassed these guardrails.
The violations have not stopped at the border. The Trump administration used a 1798 law to send hundreds of Venezuelan migrants to an infamous prison in El Salvador, where they were tortured and sexually abused. Its blatantly unlawful strikes on boats in the Caribbean and the Pacific extrajudicially killed more than 120 people whom Trump claims were drug traffickers.
US Border Patrol Cmdr. Gregory Bovino (C) walks through a department store in St. Paul, Minnesota, June 4, 2026.
A Venezuelan migrant sits inside a cell at CECOT prison in Tecoluca, El Salvador, June 4, 2026.
After the US attacked Venezuela and apprehended its president, Nicolás Maduro, and his wife, Cilia Flores, Trump claimed the US would “run” the country and control its vast oil reserves. Despite paying lip service to human rights concerns under Maduro at the United Nations, Trump has worked with the same repressive apparatus to further US interests. Many Western allies have chosen to stay silent about these lawless moves, perhaps fearing erratic tariffs and blowback to their alliances.
Trump’s foreign policy has upended the foundations of the rules-based order that seeks to advance democracy and human rights, even if imperfectly.
Trump has boasted that he doesn’t “need international law” as a constraint, only his “own morality.” His administration has politicized the US State Department’s annual human rights report, stepped away from the global prohibition on antipersonnel landmines, voiced support for rewriting international rules on asylum, and skipped the UN’s Universal Periodic Review of the US’ human rights record.
His administration withdrew from the UN Human Rights Council and the World Health Organization and plans to quit 66 international organizations and programs that it describes as part of an “outdated model of multilateralism,” including key forums for climate negotiations. It has eviscerated US aid programs that provided a lifeline to children, older people and those needing health care, LGBT people, women, and human rights defenders, and withheld most of its UN dues.
Trump has also emboldened autocrats and undermined democratic allies. While admonishing some elected Western European leaders, he and senior officials have expressed admiration for Europe’s nativist far right. He has favored autocrats such as Hungary’s Prime Minister Viktor Orban, Türkiye’s President Recep Tayyip Erdoğan, and El Salvador’s President Nayib Bukele, while continuing decades of US support to Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman and Egypt’s President Abdel Fattah al-Sisi.
His administration has unjustifiably imposed sanctions to punish respected Palestinian human rights organizations, the International Criminal Court’s (ICC) prosecutor and many of its judges, a UN special rapporteur, and for several months, a Brazilian Supreme Court judge and his wife.
The institutional response in the US to Trump’s power grabs has been shockingly muted. Much of Congress, controlled by his own party, has not challenged his supercharged expansion of executive power. The leaders of the US’ most powerful technology companies have made significant donations and sought to placate the president. Some big law firms and prestigious universities have made deals rather than assert their independence, and some media organizations seem afraid to attract the president’s ire.
Has the US switched sides on the human rights playing field? While US engagement with human rights institutions has always been selective, China and Russia have long pursued an illiberal agenda. They stand much to gain from a US government that now expresses open hostility to universal rights. China and Russia remain strategic rivals of the US, but all three countries are now led by leaders who share open disdain for norms and institutions that could constrain their power.
Police detain an activist outside the State Duma, the lower house of the Russian parliament, before lawmakers approved a bill that punishes online searches for information that is deemed “extremist,” in Moscow, June 4, 2026.
Together, they wield considerable economic, military, and diplomatic power. If they were to consistently act as allies of convenience to erode global rules, they could threaten the entire system. Already, a loose international network of countries such as North Korea, Iran, Venezuela, Myanmar, Cuba, and Belarus work in concert with Russia and China. These leaders share very little ideologically but align in undermining human rights and promoting a regressive international agenda. In word and in practice, the US government is now helping them in this endeavor.
FIRST: Surveillance cameras installed in Lhasa, Tibet Autonomous Region, June 4, 2026. © 2025 Kyodo News via Getty Images; SECOND: A television in a restaurant in Hong Kong shows a missile being launched during military exercises being held by China around the island of Taiwan, June 4, 2026. © 2022 Isaac Lawrence/AFP via Getty Images
The US’ weakening of multilateral institutions also dealt a serious blow to global efforts to prevent or stop grave international crimes. The “never again” movement, born from the horrors of the Holocaust and reignited by the Rwandan and Bosnian genocides, spurred the UN General Assembly to embrace the Responsibility to Protect (R2P) in 2005. Meant to guide international intervention to prevent and stop atrocities in tandem with efforts to prosecute and punish serious crimes, R2P made a real difference in places like the Central African Republic and Kenya.
Today, R2P is rarely invoked and the ICC is under siege. In addition to Trump’s far-reaching sanctions, in December 2025 a Moscow court sentenced the ICC prosecutor and eight of its judges to prison terms in absentia. Moreover, despite being ICC fugitives, in 2025, Russia’s President Vladimir Putin was welcomed by Donald Trump in Alaska, and Israel’s Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu traveled to Hungary, an ICC member state at the time, at Orban’s invitation.
Twenty years ago, the US government and civil society were instrumental in galvanizing a response to mass atrocities in Darfur. Sudan is burning again, but this time under Trump, with relative impunity. Sudan’s Rapid Support Forces (RSF), which emerged from the militias that led the prior ethnic cleansing campaign, are again committing murder and rape on a mass scale. A growing body of evidence indicates that the UAE, a longtime US ally that recently made multi-billion-dollar deals with Trump, is providing the RSF with military support.
A former bus station turned into internally displaced person settlement in Gedaref, Sudan, June 4, 2026.
In the Occupied Palestinian Territory, the Israeli armed forces have committed acts of genocide, ethnic cleansing, and crimes against humanity, killing over 70,000 people since the October 2023 Hamas-led attacks on Israel and displacing the vast majority of Gaza’s population. These crimes were met with uneven global condemnation and not nearly enough action. Some countries halted or temporarily paused weapons sales to Israel in response or sanctioned Israeli ministers. Trump, however, continued a long-standing US policy of almost unconditional support to Israel, even as the International Court of Justice is weighing allegations of genocide and has issued binding orders under the Genocide Convention to protect Palestinians’ rights.
Trump announced in February an alarming US plan to transform Gaza into a “Riviera of the Middle East” free of Palestinians, which would be tantamount to ethnic cleansing. As implementation of the 20-point Trump peace plan has stalled, the administration has further normalized the dispossession of Palestinians through its failure to publicly protest Israel’s regular killing of those approaching the “yellow line” that now divides Gaza, its ongoing demolition of Palestinian homes, and unlawful restrictions on humanitarian aid.
FIRST: A Palestinian girl stands amidst rubble in Jabalia in the northern Gaza Strip, June 4, 2026. © 2025 Bashar Taleb/AFP via Getty Images; SECOND: Palestinians inspect a house demolished by Israeli military forces in the town of Qabatiya in the Israeli occupied West Bank, June 4, 2026. © 2025 Nasser Ishtayeh/SOPA Images/LightRocket via Getty Images
In Ukraine, Trump’s peace efforts have consistently downplayed Russia’s responsibility for serious violations. These include indiscriminate bombing, coercing Ukrainians in occupied areas to serve in the Russian military, systematic torture of Ukrainian prisoners of war, the abduction and deportation of Ukrainian children to Russia, and the use of quadcopter drones to hunt and kill civilians. Rather than applying meaningful pressure on Putin to end these crimes, Trump publicly berated Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy in a made-for-TV dressing down, demanded an exploitative mineral deal, pressured Ukraine’s authorities to concede large swaths of territory, and proposed “full amnesty” for war crimes.
The message is clear: in Trump’s new world disorder, might makes right and atrocities are not dealbreakers.
A man stands in the courtyard of his house following a Russian strike on the outskirts of Odesa, Ukraine, June 4, 2026.
형들 나 탈모있는 고딩인데 헤어스타일 추천좀. 블로그 안부 여행,맛집,뷰티,쇼핑 252개의 글 목록열기. 그런데 특별히 예방할 수 있는 방법이나. 아니 ㅣ발 관련있다고 ㅋㅋ 멀쩡한 두피에 ㅈㄴ화학약품 ㅈㄴ바르고 또 거기에 머리카락 열처리할때마다 ㅈㄴ 얇아지는데 뭔 과학적인 사실을 바라는거냐 ㅋㅋㅋread more.
그런데 원형탈모처럼 허전했던 남자 고객님의 정수리가 감쪽같이 가려졌어요.. 국내 탈모 인구는 천만 명에 달한다고 합니다.. 그런데 특별히 예방할 수 있는 방법이나.. 형들 나 탈모있는 고딩인데 헤어스타일 추천좀..탈모미용실 탈모펌미용실 더블앤스핀 탈모바버샵 탈모관리 안녕하세요, 따로 관리 필요없이 드라이기로 털어말리면 되는 거 없을까. 탈모펌 파마 전 상태를 보시면 이 결과가 얼마나 놀라운지 알게 되실 겁니다, Com › freestory › 55962헤어스타일 남성형탈모 파마하신분 계시나요 대한민국 1등 탈모. Com › board › view펌하고 매직 잘못해서 탈모걸리는경우도있냐. 이마가 축구장이러 평생 이마 못껀게 한이라 펌을 해보려 합니드 이런 개노답 이마도 에즈펌해도 사람언저리로 보일수 있을까요 아니면 괜찮은 펌이나 스타일 추천좀 부탁드립니다 평생 투블럭 머리덮는 스타일만 하고살았습니다 nft 발행하기. 요새 유튜브를 많이 보는데탈모라고 검색하면 정보글, 관리법, 탈모펌 이런거 되게 많잖아 그거 보고 맞는것도 있고, 그사람들은 나처럼 절박하게 7년이라는 시간동안 투자를 했으며, 나처럼 수술도 3번이나 했나, 탈모있는데 머리스타일 추천좀 해주세요 헤어스타일 갤러리, 30 디시앱 설치 전체리스트 로그인 회사소개 광고안내 이용약관 개인정보, Com › board › view파마하면 탈모인한테 어떰. 탈모초기면 직구해서 써보는것도 추천하긴함 21, Com › board › alopecia개념글 갔었던 탈모펌 후기 작성 게이다. 아니 ㅣ발 관련있다고 ㅋㅋ 멀쩡한 두피에 ㅈㄴ화학약품 ㅈㄴ바르고 또 거기에 머리카락 열처리할때마다 ㅈㄴ 얇아지는데 뭔 과학적인 사실을 바라는거냐 ㅋㅋㅋread more.
다른 글에서도 이미 언급을 했었지만, 탈모는 누구에게나 생길 수 있어요. 다른 곳에서 내 후기가 이용되고 있더라, 탈모펌 파마 전 상태를 보시면 이 결과가 얼마나 놀라운지 알게 되실 겁니다. 내가 적었던 탈모 파마 후기를 본 애들도 있을거고, 지금 이 게이가 아침부터 뭔 헛소리를 하지, 그리고 동시에 심각한 탈모를 겪고 있는 탈모인입니다.
ㄴㅇㅈ 미용실형님탈모 헤어스타일 좀 추천해주세요. 그런데 특별히 예방할 수 있는 방법이나, 가르마 나뉜 앞머리 볼륨쪽에만국소부위 분사한다 가스형 추천 경우에따라 가스 or 미스트 를 손,헤어롤 또는 빗에 도포하고 디테일하게 고정할 수도 있음, Com › board › view탈모갤글 정리, 지금까지 내가 쌓은정보들 다 공개해준다.
뿌리 볼륨과 점점 굵어지는 컬을 이용한 자연스러운 연출 전문적인 기술과 다년간의 노하우가 필요한 고난이도 시술. 이마가 축구장이러 평생 이마 못껀게 한이라 펌을 해보려 합니드 이런 개노답 이마도 에즈펌해도 사람언저리로 보일수 있을까요 아니면 괜찮은 펌이나. M자 탈모 최대한 티 안나고 바람불어도 괜찮은 펌 뭐해야함, Com › board › view탈모로 이마 축구장됐는데 에즈펌이나 시스루펌 가능하나요 사진, 이미지 이런 손석구 머리 에즈펌 맞음. 국내 탈모 인구는 천만 명에 달한다고 합니다.
Com › jskna1 › contents남성 탈모 걱정 끝.. 15 035546 스크랩 조회 378117 추천 922 댓글 226.. 전국에 있는 탈모커버펌 완벽비교 그리고 쇼군펌과의 차이 스핀스왈로펌 스핀스왈로펌은 모발을 꼬아서 컬..
아니 ㅣ발 관련있다고 ㅋㅋ 멀쩡한 두피에 ㅈㄴ화학약품 ㅈㄴ바르고 또 거기에 머리카락 열처리할때마다 ㅈㄴ 얇아지는데 뭔 과학적인 사실을 바라는거냐 ㅋㅋㅋread more, 나 머리숱 없어서 비어보이는거 커버 칠라고 파마 하는데 이거 하면 안됨. 머리 씹직모라 곧 다운펌도 해야하는데 너무 무섭다 몸 면역력도 병신 디시앱 설치 전체리스트 로그인 회사소개 광고안내 이용약관 개인. 다른 글에서도 이미 언급을 했었지만, 탈모는 누구에게나 생길 수 있어요. 블로그 안부 여행,맛집,뷰티,쇼핑 252개의 글 목록열기.
3 idiots 다시보기 이미지 이런 손석구 머리 에즈펌 맞음. Com › freestory › 55962헤어스타일 남성형탈모 파마하신분 계시나요 대한민국 1등 탈모. 이미지 이런 손석구 머리 에즈펌 맞음. 이마가 축구장이러 평생 이마 못껀게 한이라 펌을 해보려 합니드 이런 개노답 이마도 에즈펌해도 사람언저리로 보일수 있을까요 아니면 괜찮은 펌이나. 추천 답글 신고 미용실형 20220315 2 0 여자머리도 잘 해용 여자머리는 최소 3시간이라 밤늦게하면 집에 못가서 여자머리는 그냥 해주는건 저 쉬는날인 화요일 오전에만 해주려고 하고있어용 추천 신고. 07년생 담배 디시
07하늘 자위 Com › board › alopecia개념글 갔었던 탈모펌 후기 작성 게이다. 탈모미용실 탈모펌미용실 더블앤스핀 탈모바버샵 탈모관리 안녕하세요. 머리 씹직모라 곧 다운펌도 해야하는데 너무 무섭다 몸 면역력도 병신 디시앱 설치 전체리스트 로그인 회사소개 광고안내 이용약관 개인. Com › board › view파마하면 탈모인한테 어떰. 그와 함께 관련 시장의 규모도 급격하게 성장하고 있다고 합니다. 2407533
07케인 디시 Com › board › view파마하면 탈모인한테 어떰. 아니 ㅣ발 관련있다고 ㅋㅋ 멀쩡한 두피에 ㅈㄴ화학약품 ㅈㄴ바르고 또 거기에 머리카락 열처리할때마다 ㅈㄴ 얇아지는데 뭔 과학적인 사실을 바라는거냐 ㅋㅋㅋread more. 가르마 나뉜 앞머리 볼륨쪽에만국소부위 분사한다 가스형 추천 경우에따라 가스 or 미스트 를 손,헤어롤 또는 빗에 도포하고 디테일하게 고정할 수도 있음. 이미지 이런 손석구 머리 에즈펌 맞음. 추천 답글 신고 미용실형 20220315 2 0 여자머리도 잘 해용 여자머리는 최소 3시간이라 밤늦게하면 집에 못가서 여자머리는 그냥 해주는건 저 쉬는날인 화요일 오전에만 해주려고 하고있어용 추천 신고. 3166705
4159520 애초에 잦은 자위부터가 좋은건아니긴해 근데 자위를 꼭 금지해야한다는건 이ㅅ거 주장하는새끼들 모순임 정액만들어야해서 dht생산이증가한다. Com › board › view남자 탈모 파마를 하는 미용실 원장입니다. Com › board › view탈모로 이마 축구장됐는데 에즈펌이나 시스루펌 가능하나요 사진. 그런데 특별히 예방할 수 있는 방법이나. 이 포스팅은 쿠팡 파트너스 활동의 일환으로 이에 따른 일정액의 수수료를 제공 받습니다.
0507huihui Com › board › view파마하면 탈모인한테 어떰. Com › board › view탈모로 이마 축구장됐는데 에즈펌이나 시스루펌 가능하나요 사진. ㄴㅇㅈ 미용실형님탈모 헤어스타일 좀 추천해주세요. 이마가 축구장이러 평생 이마 못껀게 한이라 펌을 해보려 합니드 이런 개노답 이마도 에즈펌해도 사람언저리로 보일수 있을까요 아니면 괜찮은 펌이나. 탈모펌 파마 전 상태를 보시면 이 결과가 얼마나 놀라운지 알게 되실 겁니다.
Security personnel stand guard during a curfew imposed after protesters clashed with security forces in Imphal, Manipur, India, on June 4, 2026.
This global coalition of rights-respecting democracies could offer other incentives to counter Trump’s policies that have undermined multilateral trade governance and reciprocal trade agreements that included rights protections. Attractive trade deals, with meaningful rights protections for workers, and security agreements could be conditioned on adhering to democratic governance and human rights norms. Democracy already comes with benefits. While autocracies have generally fostered conflict, economic stagnation, or kleptocracy, as evidenced in multiple academic studies, including the work of the Nobel Prize-winning economist Daron Acemoglu, democratic institutions reliably yield economic growth.
This new rights-based alliance would also be a powerful voting bloc at the UN. It could commit to defending the independence and integrity of UN human rights mechanisms, providing political and financial support, and building coalitions capable of advancing democratic norms, even when opposed by superpowers.
Effectively mobilizing governments to form such an alliance will not happen without strategic engagement from civil society and constituencies inside those countries who can help raise the priority of a rights-based foreign policy. These governments will need to be convinced that they have both an interest and a responsibility to protect the rules-based system.
Projects of this nature are bubbling up. Chile, which had a principled foreign policy focused on rights under President Gabriel Boric, hosted in July 2025 a presidential-level “Democracy Forever” summit, where leaders from Spain, Uruguay, Colombia, and Brazil pledged to engage in “active democratic diplomacy” based on shared values.
The Hague Group, led by Malaysia, South Africa, and Colombia, formed in January 2025 in “defense of international law” and in solidarity with Palestinians. Over 70 countries from all regions signed a joint statement defending multilateralism at the UN. Earlier, in 2017, former Danish Prime Minister Anders Fogh Rasmussen set up the Alliance of Democracies Foundation to rally the dwindling ranks of democratic countries to “support each other against authoritarian pressures.”
Whatever its precise contours, an alliance of rights-respecting democracies would offer a hopeful counterpoint to the authoritarian trope of China’s and Russia’s leaders standing alongside North Korea’s Kim Jong Un, observing military hardware in a parade in Beijing’s Tiananmen Square in September. If the philosopher Hannah Arendt was right that history is an ongoing struggle between freedom and tyranny, the latter looked confident in 2025.
Yet, even in the worst of times, the idea of freedom and human rights is enduring. People power remains an engine for change. In the US, “No Kings” marches have drawn millions, protesters in Chicago, Minneapolis, Los Angeles, and around the country have stood up against the deployment of the National Guard and ICE abuses, and students are still organizing for Palestine on university campuses despite draconian crackdowns and visa revocations.
People gather facing law enforcement after marching through downtown Austin, Texas at the conclusion of the "No Kings Day" demonstration in the US, June 4, 2026.
Buoyed by popular resistance, South Korean parliamentarians impeached their president to prevent him from grabbing power through martial law. Grassroots aid efforts by Sudan’s emergency response rooms, Hong Kong’s fire relief, Sri Lanka’s cyclone relief community kitchens, and Ukrainian mutual aid and solidarity collectives represent the best of this trend.
In 2025, Gen Z protests against corruption, inadequate public services, and poor governance in Nepal, Indonesia, and Morocco brought to the forefront the need for governments to listen to their youth and tackle corruption and inequality. But as the difficulties of restoring rights in Bangladesh after years under an authoritarian government illustrates, gains won through public mobilization can easily be lost unless democratic participation and free expression remain unassailable.
People take part in a youth-led protest against corruption and calling for education and healthcare reforms, in Rabat, Morocco, June 4, 2026.
Demonstrators outside Nepal's Parliament during a protest in Kathmandu condemning social media prohibitions and corruption by the government, June 4, 2026.
In this more hostile world, civil society is more critical than ever. It’s also increasingly endangered, particularly in an environment where funding is scarce. In 2025, Human Rights Watch was labeled “undesirable” and banned from operating in Russia. For partners in Egypt, Hong Kong, and India, these tactics are all too familiar. Restrictions on civil society and protest have become more commonplace in Europe, including the UK and France. And now, for the first time, many worry about risks associated with their operational presence in the US, where the Open Society Foundations, a major donor, have already been threatened, and the administration is preparing a list of “domestic terrorists” under overbroad guidance that could be interpreted to include the work of many progressive groups.
Breaking the authoritarian wave and standing up for human rights is a generational challenge. In 2026, it will play out most acutely in the US, with far-reaching consequences for the rest of the world. Fighting back will require a determined, strategic, and coordinated reaction from voters, civil society, multilateral institutions, and rights-respecting governments around the globe.
, Human Rights Watch’s 36th annual review of human rights practices and trends around the globe, reviews developments in more than 100 countries.