Will Human Rights Survive a Trumpian World?

Authoritarian Advances Threaten Rules-Based Order

The global human rights system is in peril. Under relentless pressure from US President Donald Trump, and persistently undermined by China and Russia, the rules-based international order is being crushed, threatening to take with it the architecture human rights defenders have come to rely on to advance norms and protect freedoms. To defy this trend, governments that still value human rights, alongside social movements, civil society, and international institutions, need to form a strategic alliance to push back.

To be fair, the downward spiral predated Trump’s reelection. The democratic wave that began over 50 years ago has given way to what scholars term a “democratic recession.” Democracy is now back to 1985 levels according to some metrics, with 72 percent of the world’s population now living under autocracy. Russia and China are less free today than 20 years ago. And so is the United States.

Of course, democracy is not a panacea for human rights violations; the US and other longtime democracies have their own histories of colonial crimes, racism, abusive justice systems, and wartime atrocities. More recently, authoritarian leaders have exploited public mistrust and anger to win elections and then dismantled the very institutions that brought them to power. Democratic institutions are crucial to represent the will of the people and keep power in check. It’s no surprise that whenever democracy is undermined, rights are too, as evident in recent years in India, Türkiye, the Philippines, El Salvador, and Hungary.

In this context, 2025 may be seen as a tipping point. In just 12 months, the Trump administration has carried out a broad assault on key pillars of US democracy and the global rules-based order, which the US, despite inconsistencies, was, with other states, instrumental in helping to establish.

In short order, Trump’s second-term administration has undermined trust in the sanctity of elections, reduced government accountability, gutted food assistance and healthcare subsidies, attacked judicial independence, defied court orders, rolled back women’s rights, obstructed access to abortion care, undermined remedies for racial harm, terminated programs mandating accessibility for people with disabilities, punished free speech, stripped protections from trans and intersex people, eroded privacy, and used government power to intimidate political opponents, the media, law firms, universities, civil society, and even comedians.

Claiming a risk of “civilizational erasure” in Europe and leaning on racist tropes to cast entire populations as unwelcome in the US, the Trump administration has embraced policies and rhetoric that align with white nationalist ideology. Immigrants and asylum seekers have been subjected to inhumane conditions and degrading treatment; 32 died in US Immigration and Customs Enforcement custody in 2025, and as of mid-January 2026, an additional 4 have died. Masked immigration enforcement agents have targeted people of color, using excessive force, terrorizing communities, wrongfully arresting scores of citizens, and, most recently, unjustifiably killing two people in Minneapolis, whose deaths Human Rights Watch has documented.

The US president of course has the authority to tighten US borders and enforce stricter immigration policies. The administration is not, however, entitled to deny legal process to asylum seekers, mistreat undocumented migrants, or unlawfully discriminate. In a well-functioning democracy, no electoral mandate should supersede domestic legislation, constitutional protections, or international human rights law. Trump’s team has repeatedly bypassed these guardrails.

The violations have not stopped at the border. The Trump administration used a 1798 law to send hundreds of Venezuelan migrants to an infamous prison in El Salvador, where they were tortured and sexually abused. Its blatantly unlawful strikes on boats in the Caribbean and the Pacific extrajudicially killed more than 120 people whom Trump claims were drug traffickers.

After the US attacked Venezuela and apprehended its president, Nicolás Maduro, and his wife, Cilia Flores, Trump claimed the US would “run” the country and control its vast oil reserves. Despite paying lip service to human rights concerns under Maduro at the United Nations, Trump has worked with the same repressive apparatus to further US interests. Many Western allies have chosen to stay silent about these lawless moves, perhaps fearing erratic tariffs and blowback to their alliances.

Trump’s foreign policy has upended the foundations of the rules-based order that seeks to advance democracy and human rights, even if imperfectly.

Trump has boasted that he doesn’t “need international law” as a constraint, only his “own morality.” His administration has politicized the US State Department’s annual human rights report, stepped away from the global prohibition on antipersonnel landmines, voiced support for rewriting international rules on asylum, and skipped the UN’s Universal Periodic Review of the US’ human rights record.

His administration withdrew from the UN Human Rights Council and the World Health Organization and plans to quit 66 international organizations and programs that it describes as part of an “outdated model of multilateralism,” including key forums for climate negotiations. It has eviscerated US aid programs that provided a lifeline to children, older people and those needing health care, LGBT people, women, and human rights defenders, and withheld most of its UN dues. 

Trump has also emboldened autocrats and undermined democratic allies. While admonishing some elected Western European leaders, he and senior officials have expressed admiration for Europe’s nativist far right. He has favored autocrats such as Hungary’s Prime Minister Viktor Orban, Türkiye’s President Recep Tayyip Erdoğan, and El Salvador’s President Nayib Bukele, while continuing decades of US support to Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman and Egypt’s President Abdel Fattah al-Sisi.

His administration has unjustifiably imposed sanctions to punish respected Palestinian human rights organizations, the International Criminal Court’s (ICC) prosecutor and many of its judges, a UN special rapporteur, and for several months, a Brazilian Supreme Court judge and his wife.

The institutional response in the US to Trump’s power grabs has been shockingly muted. Much of Congress, controlled by his own party, has not challenged his supercharged expansion of executive power. The leaders of the US’ most powerful technology companies have made significant donations and sought to placate the president. Some big law firms and prestigious universities have made deals rather than assert their independence, and some media organizations seem afraid to attract the president’s ire.

Has the US switched sides on the human rights playing field? While US engagement with human rights institutions has always been selective, China and Russia have long pursued an illiberal agenda. They stand much to gain from a US government that now expresses open hostility to universal rights. China and Russia remain strategic rivals of the US, but all three countries are now led by leaders who share open disdain for norms and institutions that could constrain their power.

Together, they wield considerable economic, military, and diplomatic power. If they were to consistently act as allies of convenience to erode global rules, they could threaten the entire system. Already, a loose international network of countries such as North Korea, Iran, Venezuela, Myanmar, Cuba, and Belarus work in concert with Russia and China. These leaders share very little ideologically but align in undermining human rights and promoting a regressive international agenda. In word and in practice, the US government is now helping them in this endeavor.

The US’ weakening of multilateral institutions also dealt a serious blow to global efforts to prevent or stop grave international crimes. The “never again” movement, born from the horrors of the Holocaust and reignited by the Rwandan and Bosnian genocides, spurred the UN General Assembly to embrace the Responsibility to Protect (R2P) in 2005. Meant to guide international intervention to prevent and stop atrocities in tandem with efforts to prosecute and punish serious crimes, R2P made a real difference in places like the Central African Republic and Kenya.

Today, R2P is rarely invoked and the ICC is under siege. In addition to Trump’s far-reaching sanctions, in December 2025 a Moscow court sentenced the ICC prosecutor and eight of its judges to prison terms in absentia. Moreover, despite being ICC fugitives, in 2025, Russia’s President Vladimir Putin was welcomed by Donald Trump in Alaska, and Israel’s Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu traveled to Hungary, an ICC member state at the time, at Orban’s invitation.

Twenty years ago, the US government and civil society were instrumental in galvanizing a response to mass atrocities in Darfur. Sudan is burning again, but this time under Trump, with relative impunity. Sudan’s Rapid Support Forces (RSF), which emerged from the militias that led the prior ethnic cleansing campaign, are again committing murder and rape on a mass scale. A growing body of evidence indicates that the UAE, a longtime US ally that recently made multi-billion-dollar deals with Trump, is providing the RSF with military support.

In the Occupied Palestinian Territory, the Israeli armed forces have committed acts of genocide, ethnic cleansing, and crimes against humanity, killing over 70,000 people since the October 2023 Hamas-led attacks on Israel and displacing the vast majority of Gaza’s population. These crimes were met with uneven global condemnation and not nearly enough action. Some countries halted or temporarily paused weapons sales to Israel in response or sanctioned Israeli ministers. Trump, however, continued a long-standing US policy of almost unconditional support to Israel, even as the International Court of Justice is weighing allegations of genocide and has issued binding orders under the Genocide Convention to protect Palestinians’ rights.

Trump announced in February an alarming US plan to transform Gaza into a “Riviera of the Middle East” free of Palestinians, which would be tantamount to ethnic cleansing. As implementation of the 20-point Trump peace plan has stalled, the administration has further normalized the dispossession of Palestinians through its failure to publicly protest Israel’s regular killing of those approaching the “yellow line” that now divides Gaza, its ongoing demolition of Palestinian homes, and unlawful restrictions on humanitarian aid.

In Ukraine, Trump’s peace efforts have consistently downplayed Russia’s responsibility for serious violations. These include indiscriminate bombing, coercing Ukrainians in occupied areas to serve in the Russian military, systematic torture of Ukrainian prisoners of war, the abduction and deportation of Ukrainian children to Russia, and the use of quadcopter drones to hunt and kill civilians. Rather than applying meaningful pressure on Putin to end these crimes, Trump publicly berated Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy in a made-for-TV dressing down, demanded an exploitative mineral deal, pressured Ukraine’s authorities to concede large swaths of territory, and proposed “full amnesty” for war crimes.

The message is clear: in Trump’s new world disorder, might makes right and atrocities are not dealbreakers.

나는 내 절친의 남자친구와 그녀의 자쿠지에서 섹스하는 걸 정말 좋아해 1k 견해 men with ed do this to get rock hard and fuck for hours blonde beauty takes her first big black cock ai slut generator turn your fantasies into reality. 9k farfalla femdom 러시아인 4k 포르노 hd 비디오 그룹 섹스 바람난 남편 섹시한중년여성 스트랩온 쓰리섬 아내 공유 아마추어 양성애자 입으로 잔인한 섹스 꼴리는 섹스. 그곳은 여자뿐 아니라 남자에게도 꽤 예민한 부위란 사실을 모르는 걸까요. Com › search › 여자친구와+섹스여자친구와 섹스 porn videos free xxxrated sex videos 2025 xha.

Dc ㅇㅎ

그들은 빠르게 올라타고 필사적인 신음과 함께 피부를 때려.. 섹스라는 건 정해진 레시피가 있는 게 아니.. Fns181 동거 생활 마지막 날 섹스 궁합이 끝내주는 전 여자친구와 마지막으로 한 번만 섹스했더니 역시 궁합이 너무 좋아서 조금만 화해할 수 있었어 근데.. 우선 첫 글이 뻘글이라 좀 그렇지만 궁금해서 여쭤봅니다..

Coomer.st

Crime Scene Cleaner 공략

8k views 2242 쿠르트니 러브와의 음란한 영상 통화 salome gil 140k views 0920, 혹시나 성관계 문제로 지금 상대방과의 연애가 고민이 되신다면 어떻게 풀어가면 좋을지 전문가 선생님에게 도움을 받아 그 문제를 잘 해결해 나가시길 바라겠습니다. 그녀를 데리고 나가 특별하게 느끼도록 해주고 둘만의 시간을 가지세요. 여자친구가 섹스하고 싶어 하는데, 나는 순결해.

Clare12100 Nude

6m views 5441 modelmedia asia xiao feng의 새로운 결혼 ep2 다른 남자의 아내를 섹스 노예로 바꾼다 model media asia 33m views 2138. 음료 가게 주인이 창고에서 아름다운 여자친구와 성관계를 갖습니다. 지나 거슨의 여자친구가 공공장소에서 깜짝 노출. 여자 친구랑 한달에 몇번정도 관계 하시나요.

Ca-205 K-mib

어느정도 술자리의 분위기가 무르익어 갈때쯤 여자친구가 화장실 간사이 성관계에 대해서 이야기를 그 친구분이 꺼내더군요. Explore tons of xxx movies with sex scenes in 2025 on xhamster. 19여친과의 성관계 어찌 풀어나가야될까요.

cd지은 야동 어느정도 술자리의 분위기가 무르익어 갈때쯤 여자친구가 화장실 간사이 성관계에 대해서 이야기를 그 친구분이 꺼내더군요. 온천 데이트, 즐거운 오줌싸개 섹스 미야기 리에 미야기 리에. Sqte617 여자친구와 휴가를 다녀왔습니다. 저와 여자친구가 어떤 콘돔을 사용하는지. 키타노 미나 키타노 미나 sqde017 여자친구와 함께하는 휴가. cd 윤아 디시

chinese pikpak Ep2% farfalla wifeshare 구독하기39. 매일 업데이트와 안전한 플랫폼을 즐겨. 한마디로 인간의 성관계는 하고 싶으니까 하는 것이다. 여자친구와 날것의 섹스 pornvxxx에서 여자친구 영상을 보며 안전한 플랫폼과 ai 추천을 경험하세요. 음료 가게 주인이 창고에서 아름다운 여자친구와 성관계를 갖습니다. cddldb

deepfake kimchaewon 저와 여자친구가 어떤 콘돔을 사용하는지. 손으로 가슴을 쥐며 허리를 흔드는 장면이 흔해. 우선 첫 글이 뻘글이라 좀 그렇지만 궁금해서 여쭤봅니다. 6m views 5441 modelmedia asia xiao feng의 새로운 결혼 ep2 다른 남자의 아내를 섹스 노예로 바꾼다 model media asia 33m views 2138. Fns181 동거 생활 마지막 날 섹스 궁합이 끝내주는 전 여자친구와 마지막으로 한 번만 섹스했더니 역시 궁합이 너무 좋아서 조금만 화해할 수 있었어 근데. cd 지은 야동

candfans coomer 혹시나 성관계 문제로 지금 상대방과의 연애가 고민이 되신다면 어떻게 풀어가면 좋을지 전문가 선생님에게 도움을 받아 그 문제를 잘 해결해 나가시길 바라겠습니다. 아침에 엄청나게 발기한 내 모습이 여자친구를 끌어당겼다. Com › videos › hehadsexwithhis그는 그의 방에서 동생의 여자 친구와 섹스했다. 여자친구와 사귄지 오래되었다면 또는 그리 오래되지 않았더라도 관계에 있어 진도를 더 나아가고 싶은데 여자친구도 같은 마음인지 알고 싶나요. 손으로 가슴을 쥐며 허리를 흔드는 장면이 흔해.

deepfake kpop free Com에서 여자친구 영상을 봐, 커플들이 개인 침실에서 거칠게 박는 장면이야. 변태 사랑 401 280100% marutahub 구독하기8. 요점은 정상인 여자라면 남자처럼 성욕이 있으니 그걸 자극하라는 겁니다. 4k views 0539 화장실에서 핑거링과 영상 통화하는 인도 여친 61. 저는 일주일에 1,2번씩은 하고 싶어하고여자친구는 한달에 한 번으로도 족한심지어 안해도 그만이라고 까지.

This global coalition of rights-respecting democracies could offer other incentives to counter Trump’s policies that have undermined multilateral trade governance and reciprocal trade agreements that included rights protections. Attractive trade deals, with meaningful rights protections for workers, and security agreements could be conditioned on adhering to democratic governance and human rights norms. Democracy already comes with benefits. While autocracies have generally fostered conflict, economic stagnation, or kleptocracy, as evidenced in multiple academic studies, including the work of the Nobel Prize-winning economist Daron Acemoglu, democratic institutions reliably yield economic growth. 

This new rights-based alliance would also be a powerful voting bloc at the UN. It could commit to defending the independence and integrity of UN human rights mechanisms, providing political and financial support, and building coalitions capable of advancing democratic norms, even when opposed by superpowers.

Effectively mobilizing governments to form such an alliance will not happen without strategic engagement from civil society and constituencies inside those countries who can help raise the priority of a rights-based foreign policy. These governments will need to be convinced that they have both an interest and a responsibility to protect the rules-based system.

Projects of this nature are bubbling up. Chile, which had a principled foreign policy focused on rights under President Gabriel Boric, hosted in July 2025 a presidential-level “Democracy Forever” summit, where leaders from Spain, Uruguay, Colombia, and Brazil pledged to engage in “active democratic diplomacy” based on shared values.

The Hague Group, led by Malaysia, South Africa, and Colombia, formed in January 2025 in “defense of international law” and in solidarity with Palestinians. Over 70 countries from all regions signed a joint statement defending multilateralism at the UN. Earlier, in 2017, former Danish Prime Minister Anders Fogh Rasmussen set up the Alliance of Democracies Foundation to rally the dwindling ranks of democratic countries to “support each other against authoritarian pressures.”

Whatever its precise contours, an alliance of rights-respecting democracies would offer a hopeful counterpoint to the authoritarian trope of China’s and Russia’s leaders standing alongside North Korea’s Kim Jong Un, observing military hardware in a parade in Beijing’s Tiananmen Square in September. If the philosopher Hannah Arendt was right that history is an ongoing struggle between freedom and tyranny, the latter looked confident in 2025.

Yet, even in the worst of times, the idea of freedom and human rights is enduring. People power remains an engine for change. In the US, “No Kings” marches have drawn millions, protesters in Chicago, Minneapolis, Los Angeles, and around the country have stood up against the deployment of the National Guard and ICE abuses, and students are still organizing for Palestine on university campuses despite draconian crackdowns and visa revocations.

Buoyed by popular resistance, South Korean parliamentarians impeached their president to prevent him from grabbing power through martial law. Grassroots aid efforts by Sudan’s emergency response rooms, Hong Kong’s fire relief, Sri Lanka’s cyclone relief community kitchens, and Ukrainian mutual aid and solidarity collectives represent the best of this trend.

In 2025, Gen Z protests against corruption, inadequate public services, and poor governance in Nepal, Indonesia, and Morocco brought to the forefront the need for governments to listen to their youth and tackle corruption and inequality. But as the difficulties of restoring rights in Bangladesh after years under an authoritarian government illustrates, gains won through public mobilization can easily be lost unless democratic participation and free expression remain unassailable.