US Border Patrol Cmdr. Gregory Bovino (C) walks through a department store in St. Paul, Minnesota, June 4, 2026.
A Venezuelan migrant sits inside a cell at CECOT prison in Tecoluca, El Salvador, June 4, 2026.
The global human rights system is in peril. Under relentless pressure from US President Donald Trump, and persistently undermined by China and Russia, the rules-based international order is being crushed, threatening to take with it the architecture human rights defenders have come to rely on to advance norms and protect freedoms. To defy this trend, governments that still value human rights, alongside social movements, civil society, and international institutions, need to form a strategic alliance to push back.
To be fair, the downward spiral predated Trump’s reelection. The democratic wave that began over 50 years ago has given way to what scholars term a “democratic recession.” Democracy is now back to 1985 levels according to some metrics, with 72 percent of the world’s population now living under autocracy. Russia and China are less free today than 20 years ago. And so is the United States.
Of course, democracy is not a panacea for human rights violations; the US and other longtime democracies have their own histories of colonial crimes, racism, abusive justice systems, and wartime atrocities. More recently, authoritarian leaders have exploited public mistrust and anger to win elections and then dismantled the very institutions that brought them to power. Democratic institutions are crucial to represent the will of the people and keep power in check. It’s no surprise that whenever democracy is undermined, rights are too, as evident in recent years in India, Türkiye, the Philippines, El Salvador, and Hungary.
FIRST: The Momentum Movement’s parliamentary representative David Bedo and independent member of parliament Akos Hadhazy protest against a law that bans Pride marches in Hungary and imposes fines on organizers and attendees of such events, Budapest, June 4, 2026. © 2025 Marton Monus/Reuters; SECOND: University students confront riot police in Istanbul’s Beşiktaş district following the arrest of Istanbul Mayor Ekrem İmamoğlu, June 4, 2026. © 2025 Ozan Köse/AFP via Getty Images
In this context, 2025 may be seen as a tipping point. In just 12 months, the Trump administration has carried out a broad assault on key pillars of US democracy and the global rules-based order, which the US, despite inconsistencies, was, with other states, instrumental in helping to establish.
In short order, Trump’s second-term administration has undermined trust in the sanctity of elections, reduced government accountability, gutted food assistance and healthcare subsidies, attacked judicial independence, defied court orders, rolled back women’s rights, obstructed access to abortion care, undermined remedies for racial harm, terminated programs mandating accessibility for people with disabilities, punished free speech, stripped protections from trans and intersex people, eroded privacy, and used government power to intimidate political opponents, the media, law firms, universities, civil society, and even comedians.
Claiming a risk of “civilizational erasure” in Europe and leaning on racist tropes to cast entire populations as unwelcome in the US, the Trump administration has embraced policies and rhetoric that align with white nationalist ideology. Immigrants and asylum seekers have been subjected to inhumane conditions and degrading treatment; 32 died in US Immigration and Customs Enforcement custody in 2025, and as of mid-January 2026, an additional 4 have died. Masked immigration enforcement agents have targeted people of color, using excessive force, terrorizing communities, wrongfully arresting scores of citizens, and, most recently, unjustifiably killing two people in Minneapolis, whose deaths Human Rights Watch has documented.
The US president of course has the authority to tighten US borders and enforce stricter immigration policies. The administration is not, however, entitled to deny legal process to asylum seekers, mistreat undocumented migrants, or unlawfully discriminate. In a well-functioning democracy, no electoral mandate should supersede domestic legislation, constitutional protections, or international human rights law. Trump’s team has repeatedly bypassed these guardrails.
The violations have not stopped at the border. The Trump administration used a 1798 law to send hundreds of Venezuelan migrants to an infamous prison in El Salvador, where they were tortured and sexually abused. Its blatantly unlawful strikes on boats in the Caribbean and the Pacific extrajudicially killed more than 120 people whom Trump claims were drug traffickers.
US Border Patrol Cmdr. Gregory Bovino (C) walks through a department store in St. Paul, Minnesota, June 4, 2026.
A Venezuelan migrant sits inside a cell at CECOT prison in Tecoluca, El Salvador, June 4, 2026.
After the US attacked Venezuela and apprehended its president, Nicolás Maduro, and his wife, Cilia Flores, Trump claimed the US would “run” the country and control its vast oil reserves. Despite paying lip service to human rights concerns under Maduro at the United Nations, Trump has worked with the same repressive apparatus to further US interests. Many Western allies have chosen to stay silent about these lawless moves, perhaps fearing erratic tariffs and blowback to their alliances.
Trump’s foreign policy has upended the foundations of the rules-based order that seeks to advance democracy and human rights, even if imperfectly.
Trump has boasted that he doesn’t “need international law” as a constraint, only his “own morality.” His administration has politicized the US State Department’s annual human rights report, stepped away from the global prohibition on antipersonnel landmines, voiced support for rewriting international rules on asylum, and skipped the UN’s Universal Periodic Review of the US’ human rights record.
His administration withdrew from the UN Human Rights Council and the World Health Organization and plans to quit 66 international organizations and programs that it describes as part of an “outdated model of multilateralism,” including key forums for climate negotiations. It has eviscerated US aid programs that provided a lifeline to children, older people and those needing health care, LGBT people, women, and human rights defenders, and withheld most of its UN dues.
Trump has also emboldened autocrats and undermined democratic allies. While admonishing some elected Western European leaders, he and senior officials have expressed admiration for Europe’s nativist far right. He has favored autocrats such as Hungary’s Prime Minister Viktor Orban, Türkiye’s President Recep Tayyip Erdoğan, and El Salvador’s President Nayib Bukele, while continuing decades of US support to Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman and Egypt’s President Abdel Fattah al-Sisi.
His administration has unjustifiably imposed sanctions to punish respected Palestinian human rights organizations, the International Criminal Court’s (ICC) prosecutor and many of its judges, a UN special rapporteur, and for several months, a Brazilian Supreme Court judge and his wife.
The institutional response in the US to Trump’s power grabs has been shockingly muted. Much of Congress, controlled by his own party, has not challenged his supercharged expansion of executive power. The leaders of the US’ most powerful technology companies have made significant donations and sought to placate the president. Some big law firms and prestigious universities have made deals rather than assert their independence, and some media organizations seem afraid to attract the president’s ire.
Has the US switched sides on the human rights playing field? While US engagement with human rights institutions has always been selective, China and Russia have long pursued an illiberal agenda. They stand much to gain from a US government that now expresses open hostility to universal rights. China and Russia remain strategic rivals of the US, but all three countries are now led by leaders who share open disdain for norms and institutions that could constrain their power.
Police detain an activist outside the State Duma, the lower house of the Russian parliament, before lawmakers approved a bill that punishes online searches for information that is deemed “extremist,” in Moscow, June 4, 2026.
Together, they wield considerable economic, military, and diplomatic power. If they were to consistently act as allies of convenience to erode global rules, they could threaten the entire system. Already, a loose international network of countries such as North Korea, Iran, Venezuela, Myanmar, Cuba, and Belarus work in concert with Russia and China. These leaders share very little ideologically but align in undermining human rights and promoting a regressive international agenda. In word and in practice, the US government is now helping them in this endeavor.
FIRST: Surveillance cameras installed in Lhasa, Tibet Autonomous Region, June 4, 2026. © 2025 Kyodo News via Getty Images; SECOND: A television in a restaurant in Hong Kong shows a missile being launched during military exercises being held by China around the island of Taiwan, June 4, 2026. © 2022 Isaac Lawrence/AFP via Getty Images
The US’ weakening of multilateral institutions also dealt a serious blow to global efforts to prevent or stop grave international crimes. The “never again” movement, born from the horrors of the Holocaust and reignited by the Rwandan and Bosnian genocides, spurred the UN General Assembly to embrace the Responsibility to Protect (R2P) in 2005. Meant to guide international intervention to prevent and stop atrocities in tandem with efforts to prosecute and punish serious crimes, R2P made a real difference in places like the Central African Republic and Kenya.
Today, R2P is rarely invoked and the ICC is under siege. In addition to Trump’s far-reaching sanctions, in December 2025 a Moscow court sentenced the ICC prosecutor and eight of its judges to prison terms in absentia. Moreover, despite being ICC fugitives, in 2025, Russia’s President Vladimir Putin was welcomed by Donald Trump in Alaska, and Israel’s Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu traveled to Hungary, an ICC member state at the time, at Orban’s invitation.
Twenty years ago, the US government and civil society were instrumental in galvanizing a response to mass atrocities in Darfur. Sudan is burning again, but this time under Trump, with relative impunity. Sudan’s Rapid Support Forces (RSF), which emerged from the militias that led the prior ethnic cleansing campaign, are again committing murder and rape on a mass scale. A growing body of evidence indicates that the UAE, a longtime US ally that recently made multi-billion-dollar deals with Trump, is providing the RSF with military support.
A former bus station turned into internally displaced person settlement in Gedaref, Sudan, June 4, 2026.
In the Occupied Palestinian Territory, the Israeli armed forces have committed acts of genocide, ethnic cleansing, and crimes against humanity, killing over 70,000 people since the October 2023 Hamas-led attacks on Israel and displacing the vast majority of Gaza’s population. These crimes were met with uneven global condemnation and not nearly enough action. Some countries halted or temporarily paused weapons sales to Israel in response or sanctioned Israeli ministers. Trump, however, continued a long-standing US policy of almost unconditional support to Israel, even as the International Court of Justice is weighing allegations of genocide and has issued binding orders under the Genocide Convention to protect Palestinians’ rights.
Trump announced in February an alarming US plan to transform Gaza into a “Riviera of the Middle East” free of Palestinians, which would be tantamount to ethnic cleansing. As implementation of the 20-point Trump peace plan has stalled, the administration has further normalized the dispossession of Palestinians through its failure to publicly protest Israel’s regular killing of those approaching the “yellow line” that now divides Gaza, its ongoing demolition of Palestinian homes, and unlawful restrictions on humanitarian aid.
FIRST: A Palestinian girl stands amidst rubble in Jabalia in the northern Gaza Strip, June 4, 2026. © 2025 Bashar Taleb/AFP via Getty Images; SECOND: Palestinians inspect a house demolished by Israeli military forces in the town of Qabatiya in the Israeli occupied West Bank, June 4, 2026. © 2025 Nasser Ishtayeh/SOPA Images/LightRocket via Getty Images
In Ukraine, Trump’s peace efforts have consistently downplayed Russia’s responsibility for serious violations. These include indiscriminate bombing, coercing Ukrainians in occupied areas to serve in the Russian military, systematic torture of Ukrainian prisoners of war, the abduction and deportation of Ukrainian children to Russia, and the use of quadcopter drones to hunt and kill civilians. Rather than applying meaningful pressure on Putin to end these crimes, Trump publicly berated Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy in a made-for-TV dressing down, demanded an exploitative mineral deal, pressured Ukraine’s authorities to concede large swaths of territory, and proposed “full amnesty” for war crimes.
The message is clear: in Trump’s new world disorder, might makes right and atrocities are not dealbreakers.
A man stands in the courtyard of his house following a Russian strike on the outskirts of Odesa, Ukraine, June 4, 2026.
오늘은 도쿄 여행을 뒤늦게 준비하는 분들을 위해, 최근 도쿄의 빅데이터상 핫한 두곳의 호텔인 렘도쿄 교바시 그리고 랜드어바웃 도쿄의 장점과 단점을 함께 파헤쳐보는 시간을 가져봅니다 일본 호텔이라 분명 연식이 오래된 곳이 많고, 그런 곳이 서비스 퀄리티가 의외로 좋다고 하는 분들도. 유키히로는 자연스럽고 진지한 로의 맹공을 견뎌낼 수 있을까. 일본 소프랜드 soapland를 처음 이용해보려는 한국 남성분들을 위해, 오늘은 소프랜드 가격 구조와 지역별 요금 차이를 속 시원하게 파헤쳐보겠습니다. 우리는 둘다 도쿄가 처음이 아니어서 왕궁, 도쿄타워 등 유명한 관광지는 일전에 다 가봐서 요번 여행의 주 목적은 쇼핑, 도쿄돔 야구 직관, 디즈니랜드였다 그래서 긴자도 가깝고 도쿄돔과 디즈니랜드 이동이 편리한.
| Dentetsu kyobashi station 유흥업소 오사카 델리헬. | 개인적으로는 핑크 샬론에서 제한된 선택지보다 오사카의 에스코트 나 오사카 주변의 비누랜드 를 이용하는 것을 추천합니다. | 2025年2月27日 요시와라 소프트랜드에서 플레이하는 방법. |
|---|---|---|
| 일본 소프랜드 soapland를 처음 이용해보려는 한국 남성분들을 위해, 오늘은 소프랜드 가격 구조와 지역별 요금 차이를 속 시원하게 파헤쳐보겠습니다. | 이곳은 도쿄 최대의 유흥가이자 밤문화의 중심지인 가부키초가 있습니다. | 개인적으로는 핑크 샬론에서 제한된 선택지보다 오사카의 에스코트 나 오사카 주변의 비누랜드 를 이용하는 것을 추천합니다. |
| 긴자 일본 〒1040061 도쿄도 주오구 긴자 호텔 인터게이트 도쿄 교바시 ホテルインターゲート, 3 chome78 kyobashi, chuo city, tokyo 1040031 일본 오전에 첫 호텔 체크아웃후 수하물을 맡기고 주변에서 쇼핑을 좀 했어요 그리고 체크인 시간에 맞춰서 들어와서 체크인을. | 오사카에는 한국인 가능 소프랜드는 없고, 호테헬과 안마데리버리 가 주류이며 우메다・신오사카・주소・교바시 교바시・사쿠라노미야 한국인 가능 풍속유흥. | 한국인 환영2025 신주쿠 소프랜드 가이드 — 첫 방문자를. |
작년부터 한국인 신입생은 딱 1명만 받고 있다.. 가격 플레이 시간 70분 요금 30,000엔일본 엔약 200달러 해외에서 오시는 분들을 위해read more..
일반인 취향인 분들의 취향을 저격하는 업소 미경험의 귀여운 여자애들로 가득, 일본 소프랜드 soapland를 처음 이용해보려는 한국 남성분들을 위해, 오늘은 소프랜드 가격 구조와 지역별 요금 차이를 속 시원하게 파헤쳐보겠습니다. 그중에서도 소프랜드일본식 에로틱 목욕탕는 아름다운 일본 여성과 함께 프라이빗한 방에서. 후쿠오카 소프랜드 이용 가이드 일본 현지인의 리얼 후기와 꿀팁 총정리 후쿠오카 소프랜드를 처음 방문하는 한국 남성을 위한 완벽 가이드. 오늘은 도쿄 여행을 뒤늦게 준비하는 분들을 위해, 최근 도쿄의 빅데이터상 핫한 두곳의 호텔인 렘도쿄 교바시 그리고 랜드어바웃 도쿄의 장점과 단점을 함께 파헤쳐보는 시간을 가져봅니다 일본 호텔이라 분명 연식이 오래된 곳이 많고, 그런 곳이 서비스 퀄리티가 의외로 좋다고 하는 분들도, 도쿄로 퇴근하기 vlog 🇯🇵 디즈니랜드 미녀와 야수 긴자 도버스트릿마켓 시부야 렘 도쿄 교바시 으진스 33 subscribers subscribe.
여행, 비즈니스 등으로 신바시・긴자・유라쿠초을 방문하신 외국인 관광객이 안심하고 이용하실 수 있는 일본의 풍속점을 소개합니다, 일본교경교 soapland, nuru & escort 도쿄닛폰바시 지역, 도쿄, 나카스의 소프트랜드, love lily idol produce로 돌아왔다, 2025年2月27日 요시와라 소프트랜드에서 플레이하는 방법, 개인적으로는 핑크 샬론에서 제한된 선택지보다 오사카의 에스코트 나 오사카 주변의 비누랜드 를 이용하는 것을 추천합니다.
도쿄여행 숙소 위치 중요하다면 렘 도쿄 교바시 호텔 추천, 일본교경교 soapland, nuru & escort 도쿄닛폰바시 지역, 도쿄, 유키히로는 자연스럽고 진지한 로의 맹공을 견뎌낼 수 있을까.
도쿄가면 또 여기 머무르고 싶을 정도로 쾌적하고 좋았어용, 일본여행 소프랜드 일본풍속 스시녀000 인트로020 소프랜드란, 렘 도쿄 교바시 호텔은 체크인이 오후 2시이고 체크아웃이 오후 12시인데 저희가 오후 1시반에 도착해서 30분전이니까 얼리 체크인 해주지 않을까, 우리는 둘다 도쿄가 처음이 아니어서 왕궁, 도쿄타워 등 유명한 관광지는 일전에 다 가봐서 요번 여행의 주 목적은 쇼핑, 도쿄돔 야구 직관, 디즈니랜드였다 그래서 긴자도 가깝고 도쿄돔과 디즈니랜드 이동이 편리한.
소개된 가게는 신바시・긴자・유라쿠초에 살고 있는 본, 2026年1月23日 오사카에서 추천하는 에스코트 랭킹 10선. 외모와 스타일뿐만 아니라 다른 곳에서는 맛볼 수없는 기술과 서비스가 매력적인 가게입니다. 유키히로는 자연스럽고 진지한 로의 맹공을 견뎌낼 수 있을까. 교복을 좋아하시는 분이라면 좋아할 만한 귀여운 아가씨들이 모여. 리뷰 미즈키 가마쿠라 고텐 요시와라, 도쿄 소프랜드.
A5 와규를 사용한 규카츠는 개인 화로에서 원하는 만큼 익혀서 먹을 수 있고, 와규 라멘은 매콤한데 매운맛도 read more. 취향에 맞는 여자아이와 즐기고 싶으실 때에는gogo. 외모와 스타일뿐만 아니라 다른 곳에서는 맛볼 수없는 기술과 서비스가 매력적인 가게입니다. 지점은 여러개있는데 교바시지점 추천드립니다 😋 아 저희는 3달 전쯤 예약했는데 1박에 13만원정도 했던 것 같아용 지금은 많이 올랐더라고요ㅠㅠ 댓글 4 인쇄. 가격 플레이 시간 70분 요금 30,000엔일본 엔약 200달러 해외에서 오시는 분들을 위해read more.
2025年2月27日 요시와라 소프트랜드에서 플레이하는 방법.. 오늘은 도쿄 여행을 뒤늦게 준비하는 분들을 위해, 최근 도쿄의 빅데이터상 핫한 두곳의 호텔인 렘도쿄 교바시 그리고 랜드어바웃 도쿄의 장점과 단점을 함께 파헤쳐보는 시간을 가져봅니다 일본 호텔이라 분명 연식이 오래된 곳이 많고, 그런 곳이 서비스 퀄리티가 의외로 좋다고 하는 분들도.. 오사카에는 한국인 가능 소프랜드는 없고, 호테헬과 안마데리버리 가 주류이며, 지역에 따라서는 패션헬스 서비스 업소도 볼 수 있습니다..
Kyobashi school 유흥업소 오사카 델리헬. 다른 한국 학생들은 야간반에 다니는 지역 직장인과 군인 read more. 도쿄로 퇴근하기 vlog 🇯🇵 디즈니랜드 미녀와 야수 긴자 도버스트릿마켓 시부야 렘 도쿄 교바시 으진스 33 subscribers subscribe. 그중에서도 소프랜드일본식 에로틱 목욕탕는 아름다운 일본 여성과 함께 프라이빗한 방에서.
myfans yuma24 일반인 취향인 분들의 취향을 저격하는 업소 미경험의 귀여운 여자애들로 가득. 소개된 가게는 신바시・긴자・유라쿠초에 살고 있는 본. 이렇게 섹시한 몸매로 들어가도 괜찮을까. 일본교경교 soapland, nuru & escort 도쿄닛폰바시 지역, 도쿄. 바를 선택하는 방법, 요금 체계, 섹스 플레이의 유무에 대해 알아보세요. myavlile
monsnoed 다른 한국 학생들은 야간반에 다니는 지역 직장인과 군인 read more. 다른 한국 학생들은 야간반에 다니는 지역 직장인과 군인 read more. Yoasobi heaven는 일본에서 가장 유명한 풍속 정보 사이트 중 하나인 시티 헤븐 넷에서 운영하고 있습니다. 우리는 둘다 도쿄가 처음이 아니어서 왕궁, 도쿄타워 등 유명한 관광지는 일전에 다 가봐서 요번 여행의 주 목적은 쇼핑, 도쿄돔 야구 직관, 디즈니랜드였다 그래서 긴자도 가깝고 도쿄돔과 디즈니랜드 이동이 편리한. 일본 소프랜드 soapland를 처음 이용해보려는 한국 남성분들을 위해, 오늘은 소프랜드 가격 구조와 지역별 요금 차이를 속 시원하게 파헤쳐보겠습니다. nakamachi machi hitomila
moriaaa twitter 여행, 비즈니스 등으로 우메다・신오사카・주소・교바시을 방문하신 외국인 관광객이 안심하고 이용하실 수 있는 일본의 업소에스테틱퇴폐마사지을 소개합니다. 가격 플레이 시간 70분 요금 30,000엔일본 엔약 200달러 해외에서 오시는 분들을 위해read more. 다른 한국 학생들은 야간반에 다니는 지역 직장인과 군인 read more. 2026年1月23日 오사카에서 추천하는 에스코트 랭킹 10선. 이곳은 도쿄 최대의 유흥가이자 밤문화의 중심지인 가부키초가 있습니다. miyoshi yuka fc2
missjv 긴자 일본 〒1040061 도쿄도 주오구 긴자 호텔 인터게이트 도쿄 교바시 ホテルインターゲート, 3 chome78 kyobashi, chuo city, tokyo 1040031 일본 오전에 첫 호텔 체크아웃후 수하물을 맡기고 주변에서 쇼핑을 좀 했어요 그리고 체크인 시간에 맞춰서 들어와서 체크인을. 우리는 둘다 도쿄가 처음이 아니어서 왕궁, 도쿄타워 등 유명한 관광지는 일전에 다 가봐서 요번 여행의 주 목적은 쇼핑, 도쿄돔 야구 직관, 디즈니랜드였다 그래서 긴자도 가깝고 도쿄돔과 디즈니랜드 이동이 편리한. 여행, 비즈니스 등으로 신바시・긴자・유라쿠초을 방문하신 외국인 관광객이 안심하고 이용하실 수 있는 일본의 풍속점을 소개합니다. 나카스의 소프트랜드, love lily idol produce로 돌아왔다. Dentetsu kyobashi station 유흥업소 오사카 델리헬.
missav 1855975 A5 와규를 사용한 규카츠는 개인 화로에서 원하는 만큼 익혀서 먹을 수 있고, 와규 라멘은 매콤한데 매운맛도 read more. 니혼바시 헬스삽입 안되는 거 하는 동네. 도쿄여행 숙소 위치 중요하다면 렘 도쿄 교바시 호텔 추천. 유흥업소 델리헬 소프랜드 인콜 아웃콜 할인정보를 오사카에서 찾는다면 오사카 에로틱 가이드. 도쿄가면 또 여기 머무르고 싶을 정도로 쾌적하고 좋았어용.
Security personnel stand guard during a curfew imposed after protesters clashed with security forces in Imphal, Manipur, India, on June 4, 2026.
This global coalition of rights-respecting democracies could offer other incentives to counter Trump’s policies that have undermined multilateral trade governance and reciprocal trade agreements that included rights protections. Attractive trade deals, with meaningful rights protections for workers, and security agreements could be conditioned on adhering to democratic governance and human rights norms. Democracy already comes with benefits. While autocracies have generally fostered conflict, economic stagnation, or kleptocracy, as evidenced in multiple academic studies, including the work of the Nobel Prize-winning economist Daron Acemoglu, democratic institutions reliably yield economic growth.
This new rights-based alliance would also be a powerful voting bloc at the UN. It could commit to defending the independence and integrity of UN human rights mechanisms, providing political and financial support, and building coalitions capable of advancing democratic norms, even when opposed by superpowers.
Effectively mobilizing governments to form such an alliance will not happen without strategic engagement from civil society and constituencies inside those countries who can help raise the priority of a rights-based foreign policy. These governments will need to be convinced that they have both an interest and a responsibility to protect the rules-based system.
Projects of this nature are bubbling up. Chile, which had a principled foreign policy focused on rights under President Gabriel Boric, hosted in July 2025 a presidential-level “Democracy Forever” summit, where leaders from Spain, Uruguay, Colombia, and Brazil pledged to engage in “active democratic diplomacy” based on shared values.
The Hague Group, led by Malaysia, South Africa, and Colombia, formed in January 2025 in “defense of international law” and in solidarity with Palestinians. Over 70 countries from all regions signed a joint statement defending multilateralism at the UN. Earlier, in 2017, former Danish Prime Minister Anders Fogh Rasmussen set up the Alliance of Democracies Foundation to rally the dwindling ranks of democratic countries to “support each other against authoritarian pressures.”
Whatever its precise contours, an alliance of rights-respecting democracies would offer a hopeful counterpoint to the authoritarian trope of China’s and Russia’s leaders standing alongside North Korea’s Kim Jong Un, observing military hardware in a parade in Beijing’s Tiananmen Square in September. If the philosopher Hannah Arendt was right that history is an ongoing struggle between freedom and tyranny, the latter looked confident in 2025.
Yet, even in the worst of times, the idea of freedom and human rights is enduring. People power remains an engine for change. In the US, “No Kings” marches have drawn millions, protesters in Chicago, Minneapolis, Los Angeles, and around the country have stood up against the deployment of the National Guard and ICE abuses, and students are still organizing for Palestine on university campuses despite draconian crackdowns and visa revocations.
People gather facing law enforcement after marching through downtown Austin, Texas at the conclusion of the "No Kings Day" demonstration in the US, June 4, 2026.
Buoyed by popular resistance, South Korean parliamentarians impeached their president to prevent him from grabbing power through martial law. Grassroots aid efforts by Sudan’s emergency response rooms, Hong Kong’s fire relief, Sri Lanka’s cyclone relief community kitchens, and Ukrainian mutual aid and solidarity collectives represent the best of this trend.
In 2025, Gen Z protests against corruption, inadequate public services, and poor governance in Nepal, Indonesia, and Morocco brought to the forefront the need for governments to listen to their youth and tackle corruption and inequality. But as the difficulties of restoring rights in Bangladesh after years under an authoritarian government illustrates, gains won through public mobilization can easily be lost unless democratic participation and free expression remain unassailable.
People take part in a youth-led protest against corruption and calling for education and healthcare reforms, in Rabat, Morocco, June 4, 2026.
Demonstrators outside Nepal's Parliament during a protest in Kathmandu condemning social media prohibitions and corruption by the government, June 4, 2026.
In this more hostile world, civil society is more critical than ever. It’s also increasingly endangered, particularly in an environment where funding is scarce. In 2025, Human Rights Watch was labeled “undesirable” and banned from operating in Russia. For partners in Egypt, Hong Kong, and India, these tactics are all too familiar. Restrictions on civil society and protest have become more commonplace in Europe, including the UK and France. And now, for the first time, many worry about risks associated with their operational presence in the US, where the Open Society Foundations, a major donor, have already been threatened, and the administration is preparing a list of “domestic terrorists” under overbroad guidance that could be interpreted to include the work of many progressive groups.
Breaking the authoritarian wave and standing up for human rights is a generational challenge. In 2026, it will play out most acutely in the US, with far-reaching consequences for the rest of the world. Fighting back will require a determined, strategic, and coordinated reaction from voters, civil society, multilateral institutions, and rights-respecting governments around the globe.
오늘은 도쿄 여행을 뒤늦게 준비하는 분들을 위해, 최근 도쿄의 빅데이터상 핫한 두곳의 호텔인 렘도쿄 교바시 그리고 랜드어바웃 도쿄의 장점과 단점을 함께 파헤쳐보는 시간을 가져봅니다 일본 호텔이라 분명 연식이 오래된 곳이 많고, 그런 곳이 서비스 퀄리티가 의외로 좋다고 하는 분들도., Human Rights Watch’s 36th annual review of human rights practices and trends around the globe, reviews developments in more than 100 countries.