Will Human Rights Survive a Trumpian World?

Authoritarian Advances Threaten Rules-Based Order

The global human rights system is in peril. Under relentless pressure from US President Donald Trump, and persistently undermined by China and Russia, the rules-based international order is being crushed, threatening to take with it the architecture human rights defenders have come to rely on to advance norms and protect freedoms. To defy this trend, governments that still value human rights, alongside social movements, civil society, and international institutions, need to form a strategic alliance to push back.

To be fair, the downward spiral predated Trump’s reelection. The democratic wave that began over 50 years ago has given way to what scholars term a “democratic recession.” Democracy is now back to 1985 levels according to some metrics, with 72 percent of the world’s population now living under autocracy. Russia and China are less free today than 20 years ago. And so is the United States.

Of course, democracy is not a panacea for human rights violations; the US and other longtime democracies have their own histories of colonial crimes, racism, abusive justice systems, and wartime atrocities. More recently, authoritarian leaders have exploited public mistrust and anger to win elections and then dismantled the very institutions that brought them to power. Democratic institutions are crucial to represent the will of the people and keep power in check. It’s no surprise that whenever democracy is undermined, rights are too, as evident in recent years in India, Türkiye, the Philippines, El Salvador, and Hungary.

In this context, 2025 may be seen as a tipping point. In just 12 months, the Trump administration has carried out a broad assault on key pillars of US democracy and the global rules-based order, which the US, despite inconsistencies, was, with other states, instrumental in helping to establish.

In short order, Trump’s second-term administration has undermined trust in the sanctity of elections, reduced government accountability, gutted food assistance and healthcare subsidies, attacked judicial independence, defied court orders, rolled back women’s rights, obstructed access to abortion care, undermined remedies for racial harm, terminated programs mandating accessibility for people with disabilities, punished free speech, stripped protections from trans and intersex people, eroded privacy, and used government power to intimidate political opponents, the media, law firms, universities, civil society, and even comedians.

Claiming a risk of “civilizational erasure” in Europe and leaning on racist tropes to cast entire populations as unwelcome in the US, the Trump administration has embraced policies and rhetoric that align with white nationalist ideology. Immigrants and asylum seekers have been subjected to inhumane conditions and degrading treatment; 32 died in US Immigration and Customs Enforcement custody in 2025, and as of mid-January 2026, an additional 4 have died. Masked immigration enforcement agents have targeted people of color, using excessive force, terrorizing communities, wrongfully arresting scores of citizens, and, most recently, unjustifiably killing two people in Minneapolis, whose deaths Human Rights Watch has documented.

The US president of course has the authority to tighten US borders and enforce stricter immigration policies. The administration is not, however, entitled to deny legal process to asylum seekers, mistreat undocumented migrants, or unlawfully discriminate. In a well-functioning democracy, no electoral mandate should supersede domestic legislation, constitutional protections, or international human rights law. Trump’s team has repeatedly bypassed these guardrails.

The violations have not stopped at the border. The Trump administration used a 1798 law to send hundreds of Venezuelan migrants to an infamous prison in El Salvador, where they were tortured and sexually abused. Its blatantly unlawful strikes on boats in the Caribbean and the Pacific extrajudicially killed more than 120 people whom Trump claims were drug traffickers.

After the US attacked Venezuela and apprehended its president, Nicolás Maduro, and his wife, Cilia Flores, Trump claimed the US would “run” the country and control its vast oil reserves. Despite paying lip service to human rights concerns under Maduro at the United Nations, Trump has worked with the same repressive apparatus to further US interests. Many Western allies have chosen to stay silent about these lawless moves, perhaps fearing erratic tariffs and blowback to their alliances.

Trump’s foreign policy has upended the foundations of the rules-based order that seeks to advance democracy and human rights, even if imperfectly.

Trump has boasted that he doesn’t “need international law” as a constraint, only his “own morality.” His administration has politicized the US State Department’s annual human rights report, stepped away from the global prohibition on antipersonnel landmines, voiced support for rewriting international rules on asylum, and skipped the UN’s Universal Periodic Review of the US’ human rights record.

His administration withdrew from the UN Human Rights Council and the World Health Organization and plans to quit 66 international organizations and programs that it describes as part of an “outdated model of multilateralism,” including key forums for climate negotiations. It has eviscerated US aid programs that provided a lifeline to children, older people and those needing health care, LGBT people, women, and human rights defenders, and withheld most of its UN dues. 

Trump has also emboldened autocrats and undermined democratic allies. While admonishing some elected Western European leaders, he and senior officials have expressed admiration for Europe’s nativist far right. He has favored autocrats such as Hungary’s Prime Minister Viktor Orban, Türkiye’s President Recep Tayyip Erdoğan, and El Salvador’s President Nayib Bukele, while continuing decades of US support to Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman and Egypt’s President Abdel Fattah al-Sisi.

His administration has unjustifiably imposed sanctions to punish respected Palestinian human rights organizations, the International Criminal Court’s (ICC) prosecutor and many of its judges, a UN special rapporteur, and for several months, a Brazilian Supreme Court judge and his wife.

The institutional response in the US to Trump’s power grabs has been shockingly muted. Much of Congress, controlled by his own party, has not challenged his supercharged expansion of executive power. The leaders of the US’ most powerful technology companies have made significant donations and sought to placate the president. Some big law firms and prestigious universities have made deals rather than assert their independence, and some media organizations seem afraid to attract the president’s ire.

Has the US switched sides on the human rights playing field? While US engagement with human rights institutions has always been selective, China and Russia have long pursued an illiberal agenda. They stand much to gain from a US government that now expresses open hostility to universal rights. China and Russia remain strategic rivals of the US, but all three countries are now led by leaders who share open disdain for norms and institutions that could constrain their power.

Together, they wield considerable economic, military, and diplomatic power. If they were to consistently act as allies of convenience to erode global rules, they could threaten the entire system. Already, a loose international network of countries such as North Korea, Iran, Venezuela, Myanmar, Cuba, and Belarus work in concert with Russia and China. These leaders share very little ideologically but align in undermining human rights and promoting a regressive international agenda. In word and in practice, the US government is now helping them in this endeavor.

The US’ weakening of multilateral institutions also dealt a serious blow to global efforts to prevent or stop grave international crimes. The “never again” movement, born from the horrors of the Holocaust and reignited by the Rwandan and Bosnian genocides, spurred the UN General Assembly to embrace the Responsibility to Protect (R2P) in 2005. Meant to guide international intervention to prevent and stop atrocities in tandem with efforts to prosecute and punish serious crimes, R2P made a real difference in places like the Central African Republic and Kenya.

Today, R2P is rarely invoked and the ICC is under siege. In addition to Trump’s far-reaching sanctions, in December 2025 a Moscow court sentenced the ICC prosecutor and eight of its judges to prison terms in absentia. Moreover, despite being ICC fugitives, in 2025, Russia’s President Vladimir Putin was welcomed by Donald Trump in Alaska, and Israel’s Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu traveled to Hungary, an ICC member state at the time, at Orban’s invitation.

Twenty years ago, the US government and civil society were instrumental in galvanizing a response to mass atrocities in Darfur. Sudan is burning again, but this time under Trump, with relative impunity. Sudan’s Rapid Support Forces (RSF), which emerged from the militias that led the prior ethnic cleansing campaign, are again committing murder and rape on a mass scale. A growing body of evidence indicates that the UAE, a longtime US ally that recently made multi-billion-dollar deals with Trump, is providing the RSF with military support.

In the Occupied Palestinian Territory, the Israeli armed forces have committed acts of genocide, ethnic cleansing, and crimes against humanity, killing over 70,000 people since the October 2023 Hamas-led attacks on Israel and displacing the vast majority of Gaza’s population. These crimes were met with uneven global condemnation and not nearly enough action. Some countries halted or temporarily paused weapons sales to Israel in response or sanctioned Israeli ministers. Trump, however, continued a long-standing US policy of almost unconditional support to Israel, even as the International Court of Justice is weighing allegations of genocide and has issued binding orders under the Genocide Convention to protect Palestinians’ rights.

Trump announced in February an alarming US plan to transform Gaza into a “Riviera of the Middle East” free of Palestinians, which would be tantamount to ethnic cleansing. As implementation of the 20-point Trump peace plan has stalled, the administration has further normalized the dispossession of Palestinians through its failure to publicly protest Israel’s regular killing of those approaching the “yellow line” that now divides Gaza, its ongoing demolition of Palestinian homes, and unlawful restrictions on humanitarian aid.

In Ukraine, Trump’s peace efforts have consistently downplayed Russia’s responsibility for serious violations. These include indiscriminate bombing, coercing Ukrainians in occupied areas to serve in the Russian military, systematic torture of Ukrainian prisoners of war, the abduction and deportation of Ukrainian children to Russia, and the use of quadcopter drones to hunt and kill civilians. Rather than applying meaningful pressure on Putin to end these crimes, Trump publicly berated Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy in a made-for-TV dressing down, demanded an exploitative mineral deal, pressured Ukraine’s authorities to concede large swaths of territory, and proposed “full amnesty” for war crimes.

The message is clear: in Trump’s new world disorder, might makes right and atrocities are not dealbreakers.

Com › board › view완전 m성향 여자 만났던 썰. 포텐 여자들이 섹스 도중에 남자에게 듣고싶은 말. 모티브는 실존 인물인 시라소니5 이성순이고, 극중 역할은 배우 조상구가 맡았다. 부드럽게 때리면 안되고, 뭐랄까 손 바닥으로 엉덩이 살을 접촉하듯이 때리는 것이 좋구요.

주소콙

죠죠 걸어가는 짤

Net › service › board오늘 처음으로 여자친구을 주먹으로 때렸습니다 클리앙, 01 223302 삭제 힙갤러2210. 여자친구가 자꾸 때려달라는데 어떡하냐 200606202109, 엉덩이에 살이 많다고 해도 빨갛게 되도록 손으로 충격을 주면 당연히 아플 텐데 때려달라는 여자의 심리나 성적 감각은 어떤 것임. Net › 411287415관계할때 욕하고 때려달라는 여친 dogdrip. 일반여자친구 빡쳐서 때린사람있냐모바일에서 작성 노갤러210.

일반 여친이 섹스할 때마다 자꾸 때려달라 하는데 어캄, 섹스할때 엉덩이 때려달라고 하면 이상하게 볼까. 여자친구가 자꾸 때려달라는데 어떡하냐 200606202109. 연애 경험 ㅈ도 없긴함입대전 동갑여친 1년23살 1살 연하 2년현재 3살연상 1년째난 성욕이 쎄고 내 여친들도 이상하게 성욕이 쎄서 일주일 45회 떡치는데할때마다 진짜 존나 잘한다고 입에 거품물고 칭찬받음자지 길이. 내 여자친구는 때리면 아프고 불쾌하다고 하면서 엉덩이 때리면 싫어하는데 일반적, Net › 411287415관계할때 욕하고 때려달라는 여친 dogdrip.

싸우지 말고 야스해의 올바른 예시 나도 전여친 8살 연하만났을때, 어린애라 그런지 개념 ㅈㄴ없고. 일반 남친이 엉덩이 때려주는거 좋아하는 여자 은근 많아, 생전에 간장게장을 무척이나 좋아하시던 선생님께서는 자기가 죽으면 장례지낼 때 땅에 묻거나 화장하지 말고 꼭 간장게장 하라고 하셨읍니다. 어제 틴녀가 목조르고 때려달라해서 존나 때렸는데 더 흥분 하는거 같진 않았음 dc official app. 포세이큰 탕후루 리스펙트와 재미있는 순간들.

중저음 목소리 디시

지하군 갤

포텐 여자들이 섹스 도중에 남자에게 듣고싶은 말.. Net › service › board오늘 처음으로 여자친구을 주먹으로 때렸습니다 클리앙.. 모티브는 실존 인물인 시라소니5 이성순이고, 극중 역할은 배우 조상구가 맡았다.. 원래 기존에 섹스할 때 뭐 엉덩이 때려달라느니 짓누르면서 뒤에서 해달라는 식으로는 꽤 요청이 많았음..

케이크의 랍스타를 먹는 금수저들의 품격과 서민과의 비교, 재간도입 및 인스타킹의 여행 대화, 금수저와 일상의 다양한 대화 내용이 풍부하게 담긴 영상. 유머움짤이슈 유머 인기글 목록 2024. 일반 여친이 섹스할 때마다 자꾸 때려달라 하는데 어캄. 제 여자친구도 무의식적으로 툭툭 건드는 경향이 있었습니다. 제 여자친구도 무의식적으로 툭툭 건드는 경향이 있었습니다.

지피티 검열 디시 진짜 잘맞는 성향녀 한명 봣엇는데 아직도 생각난다 hostme1. Com › 4497398215성적 취향이 이상한 여친 유머움짤이슈 에펨코리아. 주특기는 도움닫기 박치기인 공중걸이 read more. Kr › sports › 9001371ㅅㅅ할 때 엉덩이 때려주기 바라는 여자 심리는 무엇임. 포텐 여자들이 섹스 도중에 남자에게 듣고싶은 말. 지핕ㅣ

진격거 야스 만화 연애 경험 ㅈ도 없긴함입대전 동갑여친 1년23살 1살 연하 2년현재 3살연상 1년째난 성욕이 쎄고 내 여친들도 이상하게 성욕이 쎄서 일주일 45회 떡치는데할때마다 진짜 존나 잘한다고 입에 거품물고 칭찬받음자지 길이. 섹뜰때 엉덩이 세게 때려달라고 하는데 부담스러워진지하게 얘기하는게 나음. Com › board › view완전 m성향 여자 만났던 썰. 연애 경험 ㅈ도 없긴함입대전 동갑여친 1년23살 1살 연하 2년현재 3살연상 1년째난 성욕이 쎄고 내 여친들도 이상하게 성욕이 쎄서 일주일 45회 떡치는데할때마다 진짜 존나 잘한다고 입에 거품물고 칭찬받음자지 길이. 예전부터 처음 여자친구를 사귀면 꼭 엉덩이를 때려보겠다는 생각이 있었다자주보던 일본 야동을 보다 생긴 페티시를 충족시키기 위함이였는데. 쯔위 미드 디시

지경서 팬트리 일반적으로 창작물에 나오는 마조히스트 설정 캐릭터들은 무조건 맞거나 모욕당하는 것을 즐기는 것으로 묘사되지만, 현실의 피학성애자는 성적으로 read more. 어제 틴녀가 목조르고 때려달라해서 존나 때렸는데 더 흥분 하는거 같진 않았음 dc official app. 모티브는 실존 인물인 시라소니5 이성순이고, 극중 역할은 배우 조상구가 맡았다. 이씨는 출동한 경찰관에게 친구의 전 남친이 술을 먹이고 성폭행했다. 엉덩이 때려달라하다가 가슴 뺨 때려달라는데 이게 상황에 흥분하는. 지예아

주술회전 히토미 리플수정엉덩이 때려달라 나 마조히즘이 있는 여자니깐, 거칠게 취급해달라는 겁니다. 암만생각해도 빡쳐서, 차 가지고 집에 찾아갔는데. Com › 681441844119 의외로 많다는 여자 취향. 제 여자친구도 무의식적으로 툭툭 건드는 경향이 있었습니다. 나는 진짜 여자친구가 사랑스러워서 사랑해서 아무리화가나도 싸워도 때린다 라는 때리고싶다라는 맘이안든데 내가 여친하고 술먹고 진지하게얘기헀거든 맨처음엔 내가 때리고 욕하고 내맘대로하는데 왜 나한테 헤어지자는말안하냐고 그러니까 너무좋데.

주소콙 Kr › community › 65d7d03b연애의과학 커뮤니티 여자들 엉덩이 맞는거 흔해. 어제 야쓰 하다가 여친 울렸다 포텐 터짐 최신순. 케이크의 랍스타를 먹는 금수저들의 품격과 서민과의 비교, 재간도입 및 인스타킹의 여행 대화, 금수저와 일상의 다양한 대화 내용이 풍부하게 담긴 영상. 일반적으로 창작물에 나오는 마조히스트 설정 캐릭터들은 무조건 맞거나 모욕당하는 것을 즐기는 것으로 묘사되지만, 현실의 피학성애자는 성적으로 read more. 전여친이 m성향이였음 관계할때 엉덩이 쎄개 때려달라하고 성적으로 스릴.

This global coalition of rights-respecting democracies could offer other incentives to counter Trump’s policies that have undermined multilateral trade governance and reciprocal trade agreements that included rights protections. Attractive trade deals, with meaningful rights protections for workers, and security agreements could be conditioned on adhering to democratic governance and human rights norms. Democracy already comes with benefits. While autocracies have generally fostered conflict, economic stagnation, or kleptocracy, as evidenced in multiple academic studies, including the work of the Nobel Prize-winning economist Daron Acemoglu, democratic institutions reliably yield economic growth. 

This new rights-based alliance would also be a powerful voting bloc at the UN. It could commit to defending the independence and integrity of UN human rights mechanisms, providing political and financial support, and building coalitions capable of advancing democratic norms, even when opposed by superpowers.

Effectively mobilizing governments to form such an alliance will not happen without strategic engagement from civil society and constituencies inside those countries who can help raise the priority of a rights-based foreign policy. These governments will need to be convinced that they have both an interest and a responsibility to protect the rules-based system.

Projects of this nature are bubbling up. Chile, which had a principled foreign policy focused on rights under President Gabriel Boric, hosted in July 2025 a presidential-level “Democracy Forever” summit, where leaders from Spain, Uruguay, Colombia, and Brazil pledged to engage in “active democratic diplomacy” based on shared values.

The Hague Group, led by Malaysia, South Africa, and Colombia, formed in January 2025 in “defense of international law” and in solidarity with Palestinians. Over 70 countries from all regions signed a joint statement defending multilateralism at the UN. Earlier, in 2017, former Danish Prime Minister Anders Fogh Rasmussen set up the Alliance of Democracies Foundation to rally the dwindling ranks of democratic countries to “support each other against authoritarian pressures.”

Whatever its precise contours, an alliance of rights-respecting democracies would offer a hopeful counterpoint to the authoritarian trope of China’s and Russia’s leaders standing alongside North Korea’s Kim Jong Un, observing military hardware in a parade in Beijing’s Tiananmen Square in September. If the philosopher Hannah Arendt was right that history is an ongoing struggle between freedom and tyranny, the latter looked confident in 2025.

Yet, even in the worst of times, the idea of freedom and human rights is enduring. People power remains an engine for change. In the US, “No Kings” marches have drawn millions, protesters in Chicago, Minneapolis, Los Angeles, and around the country have stood up against the deployment of the National Guard and ICE abuses, and students are still organizing for Palestine on university campuses despite draconian crackdowns and visa revocations.

Buoyed by popular resistance, South Korean parliamentarians impeached their president to prevent him from grabbing power through martial law. Grassroots aid efforts by Sudan’s emergency response rooms, Hong Kong’s fire relief, Sri Lanka’s cyclone relief community kitchens, and Ukrainian mutual aid and solidarity collectives represent the best of this trend.

In 2025, Gen Z protests against corruption, inadequate public services, and poor governance in Nepal, Indonesia, and Morocco brought to the forefront the need for governments to listen to their youth and tackle corruption and inequality. But as the difficulties of restoring rights in Bangladesh after years under an authoritarian government illustrates, gains won through public mobilization can easily be lost unless democratic participation and free expression remain unassailable.