세계적인 축구스타 크리스티아누 호날두의 연인인 조지나 로드리게스가 자신에 대한 넷플릭스 다큐멘터리 방영을 앞두고 소감을 전했다.

Will Human Rights Survive a Trumpian World?

Authoritarian Advances Threaten Rules-Based Order

The global human rights system is in peril. Under relentless pressure from US President Donald Trump, and persistently undermined by China and Russia, the rules-based international order is being crushed, threatening to take with it the architecture human rights defenders have come to rely on to advance norms and protect freedoms. To defy this trend, governments that still value human rights, alongside social movements, civil society, and international institutions, need to form a strategic alliance to push back.

To be fair, the downward spiral predated Trump’s reelection. The democratic wave that began over 50 years ago has given way to what scholars term a “democratic recession.” Democracy is now back to 1985 levels according to some metrics, with 72 percent of the world’s population now living under autocracy. Russia and China are less free today than 20 years ago. And so is the United States.

Of course, democracy is not a panacea for human rights violations; the US and other longtime democracies have their own histories of colonial crimes, racism, abusive justice systems, and wartime atrocities. More recently, authoritarian leaders have exploited public mistrust and anger to win elections and then dismantled the very institutions that brought them to power. Democratic institutions are crucial to represent the will of the people and keep power in check. It’s no surprise that whenever democracy is undermined, rights are too, as evident in recent years in India, Türkiye, the Philippines, El Salvador, and Hungary.

In this context, 2025 may be seen as a tipping point. In just 12 months, the Trump administration has carried out a broad assault on key pillars of US democracy and the global rules-based order, which the US, despite inconsistencies, was, with other states, instrumental in helping to establish.

In short order, Trump’s second-term administration has undermined trust in the sanctity of elections, reduced government accountability, gutted food assistance and healthcare subsidies, attacked judicial independence, defied court orders, rolled back women’s rights, obstructed access to abortion care, undermined remedies for racial harm, terminated programs mandating accessibility for people with disabilities, punished free speech, stripped protections from trans and intersex people, eroded privacy, and used government power to intimidate political opponents, the media, law firms, universities, civil society, and even comedians.

Claiming a risk of “civilizational erasure” in Europe and leaning on racist tropes to cast entire populations as unwelcome in the US, the Trump administration has embraced policies and rhetoric that align with white nationalist ideology. Immigrants and asylum seekers have been subjected to inhumane conditions and degrading treatment; 32 died in US Immigration and Customs Enforcement custody in 2025, and as of mid-January 2026, an additional 4 have died. Masked immigration enforcement agents have targeted people of color, using excessive force, terrorizing communities, wrongfully arresting scores of citizens, and, most recently, unjustifiably killing two people in Minneapolis, whose deaths Human Rights Watch has documented.

The US president of course has the authority to tighten US borders and enforce stricter immigration policies. The administration is not, however, entitled to deny legal process to asylum seekers, mistreat undocumented migrants, or unlawfully discriminate. In a well-functioning democracy, no electoral mandate should supersede domestic legislation, constitutional protections, or international human rights law. Trump’s team has repeatedly bypassed these guardrails.

The violations have not stopped at the border. The Trump administration used a 1798 law to send hundreds of Venezuelan migrants to an infamous prison in El Salvador, where they were tortured and sexually abused. Its blatantly unlawful strikes on boats in the Caribbean and the Pacific extrajudicially killed more than 120 people whom Trump claims were drug traffickers.

After the US attacked Venezuela and apprehended its president, Nicolás Maduro, and his wife, Cilia Flores, Trump claimed the US would “run” the country and control its vast oil reserves. Despite paying lip service to human rights concerns under Maduro at the United Nations, Trump has worked with the same repressive apparatus to further US interests. Many Western allies have chosen to stay silent about these lawless moves, perhaps fearing erratic tariffs and blowback to their alliances.

Trump’s foreign policy has upended the foundations of the rules-based order that seeks to advance democracy and human rights, even if imperfectly.

Trump has boasted that he doesn’t “need international law” as a constraint, only his “own morality.” His administration has politicized the US State Department’s annual human rights report, stepped away from the global prohibition on antipersonnel landmines, voiced support for rewriting international rules on asylum, and skipped the UN’s Universal Periodic Review of the US’ human rights record.

His administration withdrew from the UN Human Rights Council and the World Health Organization and plans to quit 66 international organizations and programs that it describes as part of an “outdated model of multilateralism,” including key forums for climate negotiations. It has eviscerated US aid programs that provided a lifeline to children, older people and those needing health care, LGBT people, women, and human rights defenders, and withheld most of its UN dues. 

Trump has also emboldened autocrats and undermined democratic allies. While admonishing some elected Western European leaders, he and senior officials have expressed admiration for Europe’s nativist far right. He has favored autocrats such as Hungary’s Prime Minister Viktor Orban, Türkiye’s President Recep Tayyip Erdoğan, and El Salvador’s President Nayib Bukele, while continuing decades of US support to Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman and Egypt’s President Abdel Fattah al-Sisi.

His administration has unjustifiably imposed sanctions to punish respected Palestinian human rights organizations, the International Criminal Court’s (ICC) prosecutor and many of its judges, a UN special rapporteur, and for several months, a Brazilian Supreme Court judge and his wife.

The institutional response in the US to Trump’s power grabs has been shockingly muted. Much of Congress, controlled by his own party, has not challenged his supercharged expansion of executive power. The leaders of the US’ most powerful technology companies have made significant donations and sought to placate the president. Some big law firms and prestigious universities have made deals rather than assert their independence, and some media organizations seem afraid to attract the president’s ire.

Has the US switched sides on the human rights playing field? While US engagement with human rights institutions has always been selective, China and Russia have long pursued an illiberal agenda. They stand much to gain from a US government that now expresses open hostility to universal rights. China and Russia remain strategic rivals of the US, but all three countries are now led by leaders who share open disdain for norms and institutions that could constrain their power.

Together, they wield considerable economic, military, and diplomatic power. If they were to consistently act as allies of convenience to erode global rules, they could threaten the entire system. Already, a loose international network of countries such as North Korea, Iran, Venezuela, Myanmar, Cuba, and Belarus work in concert with Russia and China. These leaders share very little ideologically but align in undermining human rights and promoting a regressive international agenda. In word and in practice, the US government is now helping them in this endeavor.

The US’ weakening of multilateral institutions also dealt a serious blow to global efforts to prevent or stop grave international crimes. The “never again” movement, born from the horrors of the Holocaust and reignited by the Rwandan and Bosnian genocides, spurred the UN General Assembly to embrace the Responsibility to Protect (R2P) in 2005. Meant to guide international intervention to prevent and stop atrocities in tandem with efforts to prosecute and punish serious crimes, R2P made a real difference in places like the Central African Republic and Kenya.

Today, R2P is rarely invoked and the ICC is under siege. In addition to Trump’s far-reaching sanctions, in December 2025 a Moscow court sentenced the ICC prosecutor and eight of its judges to prison terms in absentia. Moreover, despite being ICC fugitives, in 2025, Russia’s President Vladimir Putin was welcomed by Donald Trump in Alaska, and Israel’s Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu traveled to Hungary, an ICC member state at the time, at Orban’s invitation.

Twenty years ago, the US government and civil society were instrumental in galvanizing a response to mass atrocities in Darfur. Sudan is burning again, but this time under Trump, with relative impunity. Sudan’s Rapid Support Forces (RSF), which emerged from the militias that led the prior ethnic cleansing campaign, are again committing murder and rape on a mass scale. A growing body of evidence indicates that the UAE, a longtime US ally that recently made multi-billion-dollar deals with Trump, is providing the RSF with military support.

In the Occupied Palestinian Territory, the Israeli armed forces have committed acts of genocide, ethnic cleansing, and crimes against humanity, killing over 70,000 people since the October 2023 Hamas-led attacks on Israel and displacing the vast majority of Gaza’s population. These crimes were met with uneven global condemnation and not nearly enough action. Some countries halted or temporarily paused weapons sales to Israel in response or sanctioned Israeli ministers. Trump, however, continued a long-standing US policy of almost unconditional support to Israel, even as the International Court of Justice is weighing allegations of genocide and has issued binding orders under the Genocide Convention to protect Palestinians’ rights.

Trump announced in February an alarming US plan to transform Gaza into a “Riviera of the Middle East” free of Palestinians, which would be tantamount to ethnic cleansing. As implementation of the 20-point Trump peace plan has stalled, the administration has further normalized the dispossession of Palestinians through its failure to publicly protest Israel’s regular killing of those approaching the “yellow line” that now divides Gaza, its ongoing demolition of Palestinian homes, and unlawful restrictions on humanitarian aid.

In Ukraine, Trump’s peace efforts have consistently downplayed Russia’s responsibility for serious violations. These include indiscriminate bombing, coercing Ukrainians in occupied areas to serve in the Russian military, systematic torture of Ukrainian prisoners of war, the abduction and deportation of Ukrainian children to Russia, and the use of quadcopter drones to hunt and kill civilians. Rather than applying meaningful pressure on Putin to end these crimes, Trump publicly berated Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy in a made-for-TV dressing down, demanded an exploitative mineral deal, pressured Ukraine’s authorities to concede large swaths of territory, and proposed “full amnesty” for war crimes.

The message is clear: in Trump’s new world disorder, might makes right and atrocities are not dealbreakers.

뒷면 qr코드 확인하니 다음주 로또번호가. 이 합의서를 보면 두 사람이 헤어지면 호날두는 조지나의 재정적 안정을. 감성적이고도 깊이 있게 포착한 그녀의 일상을 통해 진짜 조르지나를 만나보는 시간. 슈퍼스타 크리스티아누 호날두35유벤투스의 애인 조지나 로드리게스26가 파격 댄스를 선보였다.

Kr › 2022 › 1호날두 연인, 조지나 로드리게스의 넷플릭스 다큐 공개된다.

조지나 로드리게스 갤러리에 다양한 이야기를 남겨주세요.

조지나 로드리게스조지나 로드리게스georgina rodríguez는 아르헨티나 출신의 모델, 인플루언서, 그리고 크리스티아누 호날두의 약혼녀다.. Minutes ago 사진더선 제공슈퍼스타 크리스티아누 호날두 41알 나스르와 연인 조지나 로드리게스 32가 포르투갈에 대규모 저택을 완공하며 부동산 제국을 확장했다..

한눈에 보는 오늘 해외축구 뉴스 Osen서정환 기자 크리스티아노 호날두35, 유벤투스의 여자친구 조지나 로드리게스25가 섹시한 몸매를.

스페인 출신 모델이자 인플루언서 조지나 로드리게스 Argentina‑spain, 31가 드디어 축구 아이콘 크리스티아누 호날두 40의 약혼자가.

어린이날 기념 손그림들 재업 옛날 그림이랑 지금 그림이랑 비교해보면 많이 발전한거같음야호 세이운생일축하 세이운 스카이 손그림 +그림과정연한 연필로 스캐치 0.. Kr › page › view슈퍼스타는 이혼도 급이 다르구나.. 엄마이자 인플루언서이자 사업가, 그리고 축구 선수 크리스티아누 호날두의 여자친구..

Cr7의 파트너, 조지나 로드리게스가 게스 2024 캠페인을 위해 포즈를 취하며 분위기를 고조시켰습니다.

fansnet 바로 조지나 로드리게스의 이야기입니다. 감성적이고도 깊이 있게 포착한 그녀의 일상을 통해 진짜 조르지나를 만나보는 시간. 로드리게스마르카크리스티아누 호날두오 조지나 로드리게스 마르카는 호날두와 조지나가 작성한 엄청난 규모의 이혼 합의서가 유출됐다. 조지나 로드리게스 조르지나 로드리게스 1994년 1월 27일 아르헨티나 부에노스아이레스 출생. Com › enegma › 223969020704조지나 로드리게스 프로필 호날두 여자친구 그는 누구. fc2 영

fc2ppv-1773451 아마도 두 사람이 비밀리에 결혼을 했을 것이라고 강조했다. Url 복사 이웃추가 조지나 로드리게스 프로필 호날두의 오랜 연인, 그리고 이제는 약혼자 존재하지 않는 이미지입니다. 바로 조지나 로드리게스의 이야기입니다. 비디오를 보려면 크리스티아누 호날두의 오랜 여친 조지나 로드리게스 snapshot 1 0004. 조지나 로드리게스 조르지나 로드리게스 1994년 1월 27일 아르헨티나 부에노스아이레스 출생. fc2-ppv-4305700

fc2-ppv-4805436 女優 그곳에서 크리스티아누 호날두를 처음 만났고, 연인으로 발전했다. 크리스티아누 호날두의 아내이자 억만장자인 조지나. 마르카는 호날두와 조지나가 작성한 엄청난 규모의 이혼 합의서가 유출됐다. 2016년 구찌 매장에서 근무하던 중 매장을 찾은 호날두를 처음 만나게. 초라한 시작에서 국제적인 명성을 얻기까지 그녀의 여정은 영감을 줄 정도로 매력적이다. fanza actress

fc-ppv- 크리스티아누 호날두오 조지나 로드리게스마르카크리스티아누 호날두오 조지나 로드리게스마르카 마이데일리 최용재 기자슈퍼스타. mhn스포츠 김현숙 기자 축구선수 크리스티아누 호날두의 여자친구로 알려진 모델 조지나 로드리게스가 뛰어난 몸매를 과시했다. 3000억 연봉 호날두의 연인, 조지나의 찐 부자 패션. 조지나 로드리게스 갤러리에 다양한 이야기를 남겨주세요. 빨간색 수영복 차림으로 바닥에 누워 있는 조지나의 여유로운 일상이 눈길을 끈다.

fc2-ppv-4184191 초라한 시작에서 국제적인 명성을 얻기까지 그녀의 여정은 영감을 줄 정도로 매력적이다. 2022년 카타르 월드컵 16강전 포르투갈 대 스위스전에서 포르투갈 축구 대표팀 크리스티아누 호날두 37세가 선발 명단에 제외되면서 선발 출전되지 못한 가운데 호날두 여자친구 조지나 로드리게스 28세가 본인의 인스타그램에 포르투갈 감독을 저격하는 글이. 참고로 조지나는 메시 의 아내인 안토넬라 로쿠소의 인스타그램 사진에 아름답다라는 댓글을 단 적이 있었다. 트레이닝복 차림의 로드리게스는 육감적인 몸매를 자랑했다. 크리스티아누 호날두오 조지나 로드리게스마르카크리스티아누 호날두오 조지나 로드리게스마르카 마이데일리 최용재 기자슈퍼스타.

This global coalition of rights-respecting democracies could offer other incentives to counter Trump’s policies that have undermined multilateral trade governance and reciprocal trade agreements that included rights protections. Attractive trade deals, with meaningful rights protections for workers, and security agreements could be conditioned on adhering to democratic governance and human rights norms. Democracy already comes with benefits. While autocracies have generally fostered conflict, economic stagnation, or kleptocracy, as evidenced in multiple academic studies, including the work of the Nobel Prize-winning economist Daron Acemoglu, democratic institutions reliably yield economic growth. 

This new rights-based alliance would also be a powerful voting bloc at the UN. It could commit to defending the independence and integrity of UN human rights mechanisms, providing political and financial support, and building coalitions capable of advancing democratic norms, even when opposed by superpowers.

Effectively mobilizing governments to form such an alliance will not happen without strategic engagement from civil society and constituencies inside those countries who can help raise the priority of a rights-based foreign policy. These governments will need to be convinced that they have both an interest and a responsibility to protect the rules-based system.

Projects of this nature are bubbling up. Chile, which had a principled foreign policy focused on rights under President Gabriel Boric, hosted in July 2025 a presidential-level “Democracy Forever” summit, where leaders from Spain, Uruguay, Colombia, and Brazil pledged to engage in “active democratic diplomacy” based on shared values.

The Hague Group, led by Malaysia, South Africa, and Colombia, formed in January 2025 in “defense of international law” and in solidarity with Palestinians. Over 70 countries from all regions signed a joint statement defending multilateralism at the UN. Earlier, in 2017, former Danish Prime Minister Anders Fogh Rasmussen set up the Alliance of Democracies Foundation to rally the dwindling ranks of democratic countries to “support each other against authoritarian pressures.”

Whatever its precise contours, an alliance of rights-respecting democracies would offer a hopeful counterpoint to the authoritarian trope of China’s and Russia’s leaders standing alongside North Korea’s Kim Jong Un, observing military hardware in a parade in Beijing’s Tiananmen Square in September. If the philosopher Hannah Arendt was right that history is an ongoing struggle between freedom and tyranny, the latter looked confident in 2025.

Yet, even in the worst of times, the idea of freedom and human rights is enduring. People power remains an engine for change. In the US, “No Kings” marches have drawn millions, protesters in Chicago, Minneapolis, Los Angeles, and around the country have stood up against the deployment of the National Guard and ICE abuses, and students are still organizing for Palestine on university campuses despite draconian crackdowns and visa revocations.

Buoyed by popular resistance, South Korean parliamentarians impeached their president to prevent him from grabbing power through martial law. Grassroots aid efforts by Sudan’s emergency response rooms, Hong Kong’s fire relief, Sri Lanka’s cyclone relief community kitchens, and Ukrainian mutual aid and solidarity collectives represent the best of this trend.

In 2025, Gen Z protests against corruption, inadequate public services, and poor governance in Nepal, Indonesia, and Morocco brought to the forefront the need for governments to listen to their youth and tackle corruption and inequality. But as the difficulties of restoring rights in Bangladesh after years under an authoritarian government illustrates, gains won through public mobilization can easily be lost unless democratic participation and free expression remain unassailable.