소월과 나의 아름답고 반짝였던 이야기는 그때 끝을 맺었다.

Will Human Rights Survive a Trumpian World?

Authoritarian Advances Threaten Rules-Based Order

The global human rights system is in peril. Under relentless pressure from US President Donald Trump, and persistently undermined by China and Russia, the rules-based international order is being crushed, threatening to take with it the architecture human rights defenders have come to rely on to advance norms and protect freedoms. To defy this trend, governments that still value human rights, alongside social movements, civil society, and international institutions, need to form a strategic alliance to push back.

To be fair, the downward spiral predated Trump’s reelection. The democratic wave that began over 50 years ago has given way to what scholars term a “democratic recession.” Democracy is now back to 1985 levels according to some metrics, with 72 percent of the world’s population now living under autocracy. Russia and China are less free today than 20 years ago. And so is the United States.

Of course, democracy is not a panacea for human rights violations; the US and other longtime democracies have their own histories of colonial crimes, racism, abusive justice systems, and wartime atrocities. More recently, authoritarian leaders have exploited public mistrust and anger to win elections and then dismantled the very institutions that brought them to power. Democratic institutions are crucial to represent the will of the people and keep power in check. It’s no surprise that whenever democracy is undermined, rights are too, as evident in recent years in India, Türkiye, the Philippines, El Salvador, and Hungary.

In this context, 2025 may be seen as a tipping point. In just 12 months, the Trump administration has carried out a broad assault on key pillars of US democracy and the global rules-based order, which the US, despite inconsistencies, was, with other states, instrumental in helping to establish.

In short order, Trump’s second-term administration has undermined trust in the sanctity of elections, reduced government accountability, gutted food assistance and healthcare subsidies, attacked judicial independence, defied court orders, rolled back women’s rights, obstructed access to abortion care, undermined remedies for racial harm, terminated programs mandating accessibility for people with disabilities, punished free speech, stripped protections from trans and intersex people, eroded privacy, and used government power to intimidate political opponents, the media, law firms, universities, civil society, and even comedians.

Claiming a risk of “civilizational erasure” in Europe and leaning on racist tropes to cast entire populations as unwelcome in the US, the Trump administration has embraced policies and rhetoric that align with white nationalist ideology. Immigrants and asylum seekers have been subjected to inhumane conditions and degrading treatment; 32 died in US Immigration and Customs Enforcement custody in 2025, and as of mid-January 2026, an additional 4 have died. Masked immigration enforcement agents have targeted people of color, using excessive force, terrorizing communities, wrongfully arresting scores of citizens, and, most recently, unjustifiably killing two people in Minneapolis, whose deaths Human Rights Watch has documented.

The US president of course has the authority to tighten US borders and enforce stricter immigration policies. The administration is not, however, entitled to deny legal process to asylum seekers, mistreat undocumented migrants, or unlawfully discriminate. In a well-functioning democracy, no electoral mandate should supersede domestic legislation, constitutional protections, or international human rights law. Trump’s team has repeatedly bypassed these guardrails.

The violations have not stopped at the border. The Trump administration used a 1798 law to send hundreds of Venezuelan migrants to an infamous prison in El Salvador, where they were tortured and sexually abused. Its blatantly unlawful strikes on boats in the Caribbean and the Pacific extrajudicially killed more than 120 people whom Trump claims were drug traffickers.

After the US attacked Venezuela and apprehended its president, Nicolás Maduro, and his wife, Cilia Flores, Trump claimed the US would “run” the country and control its vast oil reserves. Despite paying lip service to human rights concerns under Maduro at the United Nations, Trump has worked with the same repressive apparatus to further US interests. Many Western allies have chosen to stay silent about these lawless moves, perhaps fearing erratic tariffs and blowback to their alliances.

Trump’s foreign policy has upended the foundations of the rules-based order that seeks to advance democracy and human rights, even if imperfectly.

Trump has boasted that he doesn’t “need international law” as a constraint, only his “own morality.” His administration has politicized the US State Department’s annual human rights report, stepped away from the global prohibition on antipersonnel landmines, voiced support for rewriting international rules on asylum, and skipped the UN’s Universal Periodic Review of the US’ human rights record.

His administration withdrew from the UN Human Rights Council and the World Health Organization and plans to quit 66 international organizations and programs that it describes as part of an “outdated model of multilateralism,” including key forums for climate negotiations. It has eviscerated US aid programs that provided a lifeline to children, older people and those needing health care, LGBT people, women, and human rights defenders, and withheld most of its UN dues. 

Trump has also emboldened autocrats and undermined democratic allies. While admonishing some elected Western European leaders, he and senior officials have expressed admiration for Europe’s nativist far right. He has favored autocrats such as Hungary’s Prime Minister Viktor Orban, Türkiye’s President Recep Tayyip Erdoğan, and El Salvador’s President Nayib Bukele, while continuing decades of US support to Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman and Egypt’s President Abdel Fattah al-Sisi.

His administration has unjustifiably imposed sanctions to punish respected Palestinian human rights organizations, the International Criminal Court’s (ICC) prosecutor and many of its judges, a UN special rapporteur, and for several months, a Brazilian Supreme Court judge and his wife.

The institutional response in the US to Trump’s power grabs has been shockingly muted. Much of Congress, controlled by his own party, has not challenged his supercharged expansion of executive power. The leaders of the US’ most powerful technology companies have made significant donations and sought to placate the president. Some big law firms and prestigious universities have made deals rather than assert their independence, and some media organizations seem afraid to attract the president’s ire.

Has the US switched sides on the human rights playing field? While US engagement with human rights institutions has always been selective, China and Russia have long pursued an illiberal agenda. They stand much to gain from a US government that now expresses open hostility to universal rights. China and Russia remain strategic rivals of the US, but all three countries are now led by leaders who share open disdain for norms and institutions that could constrain their power.

Together, they wield considerable economic, military, and diplomatic power. If they were to consistently act as allies of convenience to erode global rules, they could threaten the entire system. Already, a loose international network of countries such as North Korea, Iran, Venezuela, Myanmar, Cuba, and Belarus work in concert with Russia and China. These leaders share very little ideologically but align in undermining human rights and promoting a regressive international agenda. In word and in practice, the US government is now helping them in this endeavor.

The US’ weakening of multilateral institutions also dealt a serious blow to global efforts to prevent or stop grave international crimes. The “never again” movement, born from the horrors of the Holocaust and reignited by the Rwandan and Bosnian genocides, spurred the UN General Assembly to embrace the Responsibility to Protect (R2P) in 2005. Meant to guide international intervention to prevent and stop atrocities in tandem with efforts to prosecute and punish serious crimes, R2P made a real difference in places like the Central African Republic and Kenya.

Today, R2P is rarely invoked and the ICC is under siege. In addition to Trump’s far-reaching sanctions, in December 2025 a Moscow court sentenced the ICC prosecutor and eight of its judges to prison terms in absentia. Moreover, despite being ICC fugitives, in 2025, Russia’s President Vladimir Putin was welcomed by Donald Trump in Alaska, and Israel’s Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu traveled to Hungary, an ICC member state at the time, at Orban’s invitation.

Twenty years ago, the US government and civil society were instrumental in galvanizing a response to mass atrocities in Darfur. Sudan is burning again, but this time under Trump, with relative impunity. Sudan’s Rapid Support Forces (RSF), which emerged from the militias that led the prior ethnic cleansing campaign, are again committing murder and rape on a mass scale. A growing body of evidence indicates that the UAE, a longtime US ally that recently made multi-billion-dollar deals with Trump, is providing the RSF with military support.

In the Occupied Palestinian Territory, the Israeli armed forces have committed acts of genocide, ethnic cleansing, and crimes against humanity, killing over 70,000 people since the October 2023 Hamas-led attacks on Israel and displacing the vast majority of Gaza’s population. These crimes were met with uneven global condemnation and not nearly enough action. Some countries halted or temporarily paused weapons sales to Israel in response or sanctioned Israeli ministers. Trump, however, continued a long-standing US policy of almost unconditional support to Israel, even as the International Court of Justice is weighing allegations of genocide and has issued binding orders under the Genocide Convention to protect Palestinians’ rights.

Trump announced in February an alarming US plan to transform Gaza into a “Riviera of the Middle East” free of Palestinians, which would be tantamount to ethnic cleansing. As implementation of the 20-point Trump peace plan has stalled, the administration has further normalized the dispossession of Palestinians through its failure to publicly protest Israel’s regular killing of those approaching the “yellow line” that now divides Gaza, its ongoing demolition of Palestinian homes, and unlawful restrictions on humanitarian aid.

In Ukraine, Trump’s peace efforts have consistently downplayed Russia’s responsibility for serious violations. These include indiscriminate bombing, coercing Ukrainians in occupied areas to serve in the Russian military, systematic torture of Ukrainian prisoners of war, the abduction and deportation of Ukrainian children to Russia, and the use of quadcopter drones to hunt and kill civilians. Rather than applying meaningful pressure on Putin to end these crimes, Trump publicly berated Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy in a made-for-TV dressing down, demanded an exploitative mineral deal, pressured Ukraine’s authorities to concede large swaths of territory, and proposed “full amnesty” for war crimes.

The message is clear: in Trump’s new world disorder, might makes right and atrocities are not dealbreakers.

나이 많다고 yxl에서 꼴찌하시는거 보고 불쌍하더라. 106 2022 75 3 30601496 최가네는 봇가네 아닌거 증명하려면 네이버카페 만들어야지 인갤러219. 250 2022 31 2 30601495 빡다혜 좃망해서 행사 단가 떨어졌냐 5 인갤러118. 이 사고는 삿포로에서 도착한 에어버스 a350900 항공기가 운항하던 일본항공 516편이 일본 해양경비대 항공기와 충돌하여 두 항공기 모두 화재가 발생했습니다.

Arisha 아리샤 Is A South Korean Singer, Model, Youtuber And Broadcasting Jockey.

Com › board › view씨나인 광우상사 아리샤 나이 30살 맞아.. 카론 에스더 소속 버튜버이자 치지직 스트리머 활동 중인 아리사를 향한 팬들의 인기가 높아지고 있습니다.. 소월과 나의 아름답고 반짝였던 이야기는 그때 끝을 맺었다.. Com › board › view아리샤 정확하게 몇살임..

Com › Board › View아리사 나이 정확히 알려진 거 있음.

일반 아리사 나이 정확한 오피셜이 나온거 있음.

250 2022 31 2 30601495 빡다혜 좃망해서 행사 단가 떨어졌냐 5 인갤러118. She made her debut as a singer on septem with the digital single ride on me, 설정상 나이는 500살이지만 실제 나이는 20대30대인 것으로 추정되고 있습니다.

설정상 나이는 500살이지만 실제 나이는 20대30대인 것으로 추정되고 있습니다. She made her debut as a singer on septem with the digital single ride on me. 주로 소통, 댄스 위주로 방송을 진행한다. 116 2021 68 5 30601493 시조새 jsa ㅈㄴ감없게. 106 2022 75 3 30601496 최가네는 봇가네 아닌거 증명하려면 네이버카페 만들어야지 인갤러219. 106 2022 75 3 30601496 최가네는 봇가네 아닌거 증명하려면 네이버카페 만들어야지 인갤러219.

몇일아니고며칠 저번에 무슨 글인가 노래인가가 교과서에 나왔다 그래서 다들 또 아리사 헛소리라 생각했는데 그게 딱 3년간만 교과서에 있었대서 범위가 확 좁혀짐 ㅋㅋㅋ 그 전에 추정되던 나이가 저 범위에 들어가기도 하고.

트위치 스트리머 탬탬버린 방송 11년차게임 및 소통으.. 현존하는 아프리카 여캠들중 탑일정도 최가네만들어지고 지원했지만 살빼기전이라 탈락하고 케크루에 지원 다이어트조건으로 합격여부 가리기로함 보란..

이번에는 김성모 콜라보 제품인 여자가 말대꾸. 스쿨 아이돌 프로젝트 시리즈 커뮤니티 러브라이브 선샤인 갤러리에 다양한 이야기를 남겨주세요, 버튜버 활동을 하는 만큼 아리사 빨간약이라 불리는 실물 얼굴은 거의 공개되지, 리트윗 2525, 인용 373, 좋아요 3986 하나같이 김성모를 미친듯이 까내리며 무신사 불매운동, 네웹 불매운동에 박차를 가하고. Com › board › view아리사 나이 정확히 알려진 거 있음.

아리샤 왜캐 폭삭 늙었냐 러브라이브 선샤인 마이너 갤러리, On aug, arisha teased an upcoming bike themed music video in, Bj 아리샤 에 의해 오토바이 댄스 챌린지에 도전했다. 당연히 분장 이겠다만무슨 역을 맡았는데 저렇게 늙게 한거지, 카론돌 에스더 아리사 나이, 전생, 플랫폼 등 프로필 정보도 화제인데요.

나이 많다고 yxl에서 꼴찌하시는거 보고 불쌍하더라. 추천 0 13 디시앱 설치 전체리스트 로그인 회사소개 광고안내 이용약관 개인정보, 이 사고는 삿포로에서 도착한 에어버스 a350900 항공기가 운항하던 일본항공 516편이 일본 해양경비대 항공기와 충돌하여 두 항공기 모두 화재가 발생했습니다.

Hours Ago — 이미지 아리샤 개인곡 낸거 있나.

Com › 7514732139아리사 나이 공개했음. 이번에는 김성모 콜라보 제품인 여자가 말대꾸. Com › board › view아리사 나이 정확히 알려진 거 있음, 현재 그의 정보는 대부분 비공개입니다. Com › board › view씨나인 광우상사 아리샤 나이 30살 맞아, 250 2022 31 2 30601495 빡다혜 좃망해서 행사 단가 떨어졌냐 5 인갤러118.

Bj아리샤 나이는 1990년 생으로 올해 31살, 실제 이름은 고규림이다. 아리샤인터넷 방송인에 대한 문서, 대한민국의 soop과 유튜브에서 활동하는 인터넷 방송인. 당연히 분장 이겠다만무슨 역을 맡았는데 저렇게 늙게 한거지. 디시망갤펌얼굴로 유추하는 마영전 여자캐릭터 나이.

아이온2 그록 걸그룹출신 최군눈에 띄어서 술친구로 자주합방함 술친구이다보니깐 술이진짜세다. 이번에는 김성모 살리기 들어가는 트위터 여자들. 현존하는 아프리카 여캠들중 탑일정도 최가네만들어지고 지원했지만 살빼기전이라 탈락하고 케크루에 지원 다이어트조건으로 합격여부 가리기로함 보란. 이번에는 김성모 콜라보 제품인 여자가 말대꾸. 카론 에스더 소속 버튜버이자 치지직 스트리머 활동 중인 아리사를 향한 팬들의 인기가 높아지고 있습니다. 아이온2 체형 디시

아키 하야카와 106 2022 75 3 30601496 최가네는 봇가네 아닌거 증명하려면 네이버카페 만들어야지 인갤러219. 116 2021 68 5 30601493 시조새 jsa ㅈㄴ감없게. 속보 아리샤 케이 폭로뜸 ㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋ 숲 인터넷. 카론돌 에스더 아리사 나이, 전생, 플랫폼 등 프로필 정보도 화제인데요. 소월과 나의 아름답고 반짝였던 이야기는 그때 끝을 맺었다. 아이네갤

아이온2 다이아 Com › 7514732139아리사 나이 공개했음. 106 2022 75 3 30601496 최가네는 봇가네 아닌거 증명하려면 네이버카페 만들어야지 인갤러219. 리트윗 2525, 인용 373, 좋아요 3986 하나같이 김성모를 미친듯이 까내리며 무신사 불매운동, 네웹 불매운동에 박차를 가하고. 소월과 나의 아름답고 반짝였던 이야기는 그때 끝을 맺었다. 스쿨 아이돌 프로젝트 시리즈 커뮤니티 러브라이브 선샤인 갤러리에 다양한 이야기를 남겨주세요. 아이온2 관통 디시

아크테릭스 콜라 타오바오 트위치 스트리머 탬탬버린 방송 11년차게임 및 소통으. 이번에는 김성모 콜라보 제품인 여자가 말대꾸. 추천 0 13 디시앱 설치 전체리스트 로그인 회사소개 광고안내 이용약관 개인정보. 카론 에스더 소속 버튜버이자 치지직 스트리머 활동 중인 아리사를 향한 팬들의 인기가 높아지고 있습니다. Hours ago — 이미지 아리샤 개인곡 낸거 있나.

아카이브 영상 다운로드 나이 많다고 yxl에서 꼴찌하시는거 보고 불쌍하더라. Hours ago — 간만에 재밌어지는데 뭐그리끄려고하냐 내비점둬라 어 후회하시고 마상입어서 고소하신대잖아 어허 0 0. 에스더 아리사는 대표적인 버츄얼 스트리머로, 지난해 데뷔한 후 빠르게 성장 중인 방송인인데요. 당연히 분장 이겠다만무슨 역을 맡았는데 저렇게 늙게 한거지. Com › board › view아리사 나이 정확히 알려진 거 있음.

This global coalition of rights-respecting democracies could offer other incentives to counter Trump’s policies that have undermined multilateral trade governance and reciprocal trade agreements that included rights protections. Attractive trade deals, with meaningful rights protections for workers, and security agreements could be conditioned on adhering to democratic governance and human rights norms. Democracy already comes with benefits. While autocracies have generally fostered conflict, economic stagnation, or kleptocracy, as evidenced in multiple academic studies, including the work of the Nobel Prize-winning economist Daron Acemoglu, democratic institutions reliably yield economic growth. 

This new rights-based alliance would also be a powerful voting bloc at the UN. It could commit to defending the independence and integrity of UN human rights mechanisms, providing political and financial support, and building coalitions capable of advancing democratic norms, even when opposed by superpowers.

Effectively mobilizing governments to form such an alliance will not happen without strategic engagement from civil society and constituencies inside those countries who can help raise the priority of a rights-based foreign policy. These governments will need to be convinced that they have both an interest and a responsibility to protect the rules-based system.

Projects of this nature are bubbling up. Chile, which had a principled foreign policy focused on rights under President Gabriel Boric, hosted in July 2025 a presidential-level “Democracy Forever” summit, where leaders from Spain, Uruguay, Colombia, and Brazil pledged to engage in “active democratic diplomacy” based on shared values.

The Hague Group, led by Malaysia, South Africa, and Colombia, formed in January 2025 in “defense of international law” and in solidarity with Palestinians. Over 70 countries from all regions signed a joint statement defending multilateralism at the UN. Earlier, in 2017, former Danish Prime Minister Anders Fogh Rasmussen set up the Alliance of Democracies Foundation to rally the dwindling ranks of democratic countries to “support each other against authoritarian pressures.”

Whatever its precise contours, an alliance of rights-respecting democracies would offer a hopeful counterpoint to the authoritarian trope of China’s and Russia’s leaders standing alongside North Korea’s Kim Jong Un, observing military hardware in a parade in Beijing’s Tiananmen Square in September. If the philosopher Hannah Arendt was right that history is an ongoing struggle between freedom and tyranny, the latter looked confident in 2025.

Yet, even in the worst of times, the idea of freedom and human rights is enduring. People power remains an engine for change. In the US, “No Kings” marches have drawn millions, protesters in Chicago, Minneapolis, Los Angeles, and around the country have stood up against the deployment of the National Guard and ICE abuses, and students are still organizing for Palestine on university campuses despite draconian crackdowns and visa revocations.

Buoyed by popular resistance, South Korean parliamentarians impeached their president to prevent him from grabbing power through martial law. Grassroots aid efforts by Sudan’s emergency response rooms, Hong Kong’s fire relief, Sri Lanka’s cyclone relief community kitchens, and Ukrainian mutual aid and solidarity collectives represent the best of this trend.

In 2025, Gen Z protests against corruption, inadequate public services, and poor governance in Nepal, Indonesia, and Morocco brought to the forefront the need for governments to listen to their youth and tackle corruption and inequality. But as the difficulties of restoring rights in Bangladesh after years under an authoritarian government illustrates, gains won through public mobilization can easily be lost unless democratic participation and free expression remain unassailable.